### What this PR does / why we need it?
when using dynamic eplb, patch v1 executor to avoid create child process
failed.
### How was this patch tested?
deepseek in v3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt deepseek-v3.2 to vllm 0.11.0, removing the useless patch.
The final goal is to remove all the patches and align the code arch to
vllm, thus we need to do the following work in next prs.
TODO:
- [x] remove patch on attention spec
- [ ] refactor the kvcache creation logic
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
1. CI passed with existing test.
2. Test pass with deepseek-v3.2-exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Feat] Supports Aclgraph for bge-m3
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
```
pytest -s tests/e2e/singlecard/test_embedding.py
pytest -s tests/e2e/singlecard/test_embedding_aclgraph.py
```
to start an online server with bs 10, each batch's seq length=8192, we
set --max-num-batched-tokens=8192*10 to ensure encoder is not chunked:
```
vllm serve /home/data/bge-m3 --max_model_len 1024 --served-model-name "bge-m3" --task embed --host 0.0.0.0 --port 9095 --max-num-batched-tokens 81920 --compilation-config '{"cudagraph_capture_sizes":[8192, 10240, 20480, 40960, 81920]}'
```
For bs10, each batch's seq length=8192, QPS is improved from 85 to 104,
which is a 22% improvement, lots of host bound is reduced.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: xuyexiong <xuyexiong@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangyongjun <1104133197@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor KVCache as page_size_bytes is ineffective.
1. Currently the `AttentionSpec` is patched, but the `page_size_bytes`
is still using that in vLLM in runtime, thus the patch is not working
actually. Thus this pr removes the patch on `AttentionSpec`, and will do
the final fix in vLLM.
2. Use `MLAAttentionSpec` instead of `FullAttentionSpec` to reduce
`page_size_bytes` of spec, so that num_blocks in spec could double
### How was this patch tested?
Test pass with Qwen3-Next and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, users have to set `HCCL_BUFFSIZE` to 512~1024 to perform mc2
operators (dispatch and combine) while running moe models with large
`ep_size` and `batch_size`. This environmental variable not only affects
allocated VRAM for mc2 group, but also increases VRAM allocation for dp,
tp & ep groups, leading to significant kvcache and free_memory drops.
This PR supports to automatically calculate and set `hccl_buffer_size`
for each process group **(except mc2 group)** separately when users set
`HCCL_BUFFSIZE` for mc2 group. This can significantly reduce wasted
buffer_size set for dp, tp & ep groups.
Note that current mc2 operators can only perform communication space
partitioning based on `HCCL_BUFFSIZE` configuration. Once they support
`hccl_buffer_size` configuration with `pg_options` while initializing
process group, we'll caculate the required buffer size and users would
avoid set `HCCL_BUFFSIZE` themselves.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
We performed E2E serving with deepseek_r1 initializing DP/TP/EP/MC2
process group and observed significant kv_cache and free_memory
increase!
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Modify the enable range of _merge_multimodal_embeddings patch. The
current patch is only enabled for offline inference on the platform. For
online serviceization, due to the addition of the worker sub-process, it
is not enabled within the sub-process.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: booker123456 <945658361@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. clean up v0.10.2 support in ut and e2e test
2. remove v0.11.0 period job, we're at v0.11.0 now.
3. remove uesless patch for deepseek v3.2. They have been done in vLLM
already.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Upgrade vLLM to newest commit
- Fix the aclgraph doesn't work problem, caused by
24fab45d96
- Fix PoolerOutput import error, caused by
755ed7b05b
- Fix the aclgraph weight load error to keep the same with torchair fix.
4492e3a554
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
All test should pass
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
52d0cb8458
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to address the incompatibility of the `.masked_scatter_`
operation in the current `_merge_multimodal_embeddings` function on
Ascend. For now, it reverts to the previous version of the CPU
operation, which can be executed asynchronously on the device side to
enhance performance.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
---------
Signed-off-by: booker123456 <945658361@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR deletes ~2K lines of code about deepseek modeling. It falls back
CustomDeepseekV2 modules to original vllm implementations and adapts
some modifications in vllm about deepseek and moe.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E vllm serving with torchair graph mode and eager mode.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
759ef49b15
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yiz-liu <136800916+yiz-liu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Really strange that `register_oot` doesn't work with `SharedFusedMoE`,
so we have to add this patch, for now.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
This PR won't have any effect in DeepSeek since we currently still stick
with the old `CustomDeepseekV2`.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
0cdd213641
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Cleanup useless file in patch module. Update the lora support list is OK
in vLLM Ascend, no need to patch vLLM
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
f4962a6d55
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve
decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP
scenario.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8
GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when
oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing.
performance data:
<img width="1442" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row
dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces.
| No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
eddaafc1c7
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the LoRA accuracy issue that introduced by custom AscendC operator
"bgmv_shrink, sgmv_shrink, bgmv_expand, sgmv_epand".
The bug details are:
- In the kernel function, if you want to call GlobalTensor.GetSize
method, you have to pass the second parameter of bufferSize when you
call GlobalTensor.SetGlobalBuffer first.
- Or GlobalTensor.GetSize method will return a random value.
- You can refer to [this
doc](https://www.hiascend.com/document/detail/zh/CANNCommunityEdition/81RC1alpha002/apiref/ascendcopapi/atlasascendc_api_07_00024.html).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_ilama_lora.py
pytest -sv tests/e2e/multicard/test_ilama_lora_tp2.py
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
a344a5aa0a
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: paulyu12 <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The mergence of the upstream
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22592 caused a vllm-ascend
LoRA inference bug. The details are following:
According to
[torch_npu/npu/_stream_check.py](863b9071cb/torch_npu/npu/_stream_check.py (L74)),
NPU device type tensors have attributes is_cuda=True and is_npu=True.
This causes that vLLM's apply_repetition_penalties function will run
into the branch of "if logits.is_cuda and logits.is_contiguous()" and
call the custom op implemented in CUDA, which is not compatible with
NPU.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_ilama_lora.py
pytest -sv tests/e2e/multicard/test_ilama_lora_tp2.py
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
fe8d7b6f03
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: paulyu12 <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. update `CachedRequestState` as `NewRequestData` changed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22570
2. drop maintenance of vllm v0.10.0 in the branch main
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
92ff41abea
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove redundant imported `envs`, using `envs_ascend` instead.
```python
import vllm.envs as envs_vllm
import vllm_ascend.envs as envs_ascend
```
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
71683ca6f6
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is to add e2e test for using npu_mm_all_reduce_base fusion
kernel.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
not involved
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
5d5d419ca6
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
Refactor Sampler implementation from patch way to inherit from vLLM
Sampler interface.
Next step: Make the op `TopKTopPSampler` in vLLM support custom ops
register mechanism
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
61a6905ab0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
it'll execute allreduce and malmul seperately in vllm RowParallelLinear
forward funcion, this function use torch_npu.npu_mm_all_reduce_base to
execute allreduce and matmul in a fused kernel way. this will gain a 20%
performance
promotion in eager mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
this PR introduce a new env `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MATMUL_ALLREDUCE` to
control whether enable the feature or not.
### How was this patch tested?
the patch is tested by adding a new test file `test_patch_linear.py` to
guard the ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Upgrade to v0.10.0
- Drop v0.9.2 version compatibility
- Add patch for
`vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_common/patch_sampler_gather_logprobs.py`
as workaround of
f3a683b7c9
for v0.10.0 and also add e2e test `test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- Pin transformers<4.54.0 as workaround of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2034
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Test locally:
`VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=true pytest -sv
tests/e2e/singlecard/test_offline_inference.py::test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Performance optimization for apply_top_k_top_p
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_TOPP_OPTIMIZATION to enable this feature
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
6a9e6b2abf
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
vllm has released 0.9.2. This PR drop 0.9.1 support.
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
b942c094e3
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports torchair graph mode with non-mla backend on both 800IA2
and 300I Duo platforms. The main change is to add
`attention_v1_torchair.py` to support specific attention related
operations that are required by torchair.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Before this PR, vLLM-Ascend only allows deepseek to use torchair. Now we
can also use it with pangu. Besides, we add a support model list to
control which type of models that can use torchair.
### How was this patch tested?
We have test it with PanguProMoE on both 800IA2 and 300I Duo platforms,
and model generates answer normally.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a bug that use broadcast with cpu_group when running dp.
The `broadcast310p` patch will take effects for both cpu_group and
device group, but we only need it for device group. Hence a wrapper is
added to allow cpu_group use native torch broadcast and it solves the
bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
With this PR, DP on 310p runs normally and generates reasonable answers.
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Add static build_info py file to show soc and sleep mode info. It helps
to make the code clean and the error info will be more friendly for
users
This PR also added the unit test for vllm_ascend/utils.py
This PR also added the base test class for all ut in tests/ut/base.py
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use fused ops torch_npu.npu_top_k_top_p(logits, p, k) when p and k are
not None, otherwise fallback to the original one. The replacement will
take place automatically when `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_OPTIMIZE=1` .
This patch are using `npu_top_k_top_p` which required
torch_npu>=2.5.1.post1.dev20250619
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Tested by DeepSeek R1 and UT passed
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to address a long-standing **CI bug** and remove unused
code. The specific changes include:
1. **Fixing CI Bug**: Resolves the root cause of CI test failures or
instability. This often stems from incorrect environment configurations,
dependency version conflicts, or flawed test script logic. This fix
ensures the reliability and consistency of the CI pipeline.
2. **Removing `patch_eagle.py`**: Deletes the `patch_eagle.py` file,
which is no longer utilized by the project. This file was likely legacy
code, experimental code, or its functionality has since been replaced by
other modules. Its removal helps reduce codebase complexity, improves
maintainability, and prevents potential confusion.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this PR primarily focuses on internal CI stability maintenance and
code cleanup. It does not introduce any user-visible changes to APIs,
interfaces, or other behaviors.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed. Specifically:
1. **Existing CI Pipelines Passed**: After fixing the CI bug, all
existing CI tests and pipelines were verified to run correctly and pass
successfully.
2. **Code Cleanup Verified**: Following the removal of `patch_eagle.py`,
it was ensured that any related functional modules (if applicable)
continue to work as expected, without introducing new regressions. This
was typically verified by running the project's main test suite.
Signed-off-by: yuancaoyaoHW <a2749322671@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
`stateless_init_dp_group` in vllm works with non-cuda platform now.
Remove this useless patch.
Which was introduced in vllm-ascend by
e74331a1ed
(v0.8.4rc2)
vLLM upstream merged:
3e472d882a
(v0.8.0)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. [PR913](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/913)
introduced an error that caused V0's spec decode function to fail.
[PR1109](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1109) wanted
to fix this problem. Unfortunately, the fix broke the ngram function. I
fixed the ngram function in this PR. **PS**: Q: Why is there a problem
when ngram is not found when pr1109 is merged? A: The newly introduced
problem will only appear when tp>1, and the use cases on CI are all tp=1
2. In versions after 0.7.3, vllm-ascend deleted some spec decode UTs to
avoid CI taking too long, including eagle speculative UTs, which made CI
unable to take care of the eagle function. I added
it(`test_eagle_correctness.py`) back in this PR
3. Because of the reason mentioned in 2, the current version of Eagle
has a problem. I located and fixed this problem. It was because vllm's
`draft_model_runner.py` was changed and vllm-ascend was not synchronized
in time.
4. Currently, the UTs of v0 and v1 are mixed in the spec_decode
directory. I split them into two directories: spec_decode_v0 and
spec_decode_v1.
5. i found
`vllm.spec_decode.multi_step_worker.MultiStepWorker.set_include_gpu_probs_tensor`
and
`vllm.spec_decode.multi_step_worker.MultiStepWorker.set_should_modify_greedy_probs_inplace`
have changed in vllm, so i remove it in this pr.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR fixes the functions of ngram and eagle spec decode in the v0
engine
### How was this patch tested?
tested by CI
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add initial experimental support for Ascend 310P, this patch squash
below PR into one to help validation:
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/914
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1318
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1327
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
User can run vLLM on Altlas 300I DUO series
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with:
- E2E image build for 310P
- CI test on A2 with e2e test and longterm test
- Unit test missing because need a real 310P image to have the test,
will add in a separate PR later.
- Manually e2e test:
- Qwen2.5-7b-instruct, Qwen2.5-0.5b, Qwen3-0.6B, Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/914#issuecomment-2942989322
- Pangu MGoE 72B
The patch has been tested locally on Ascend 310P hardware to ensure that
the changes do not break existing functionality and that the new
features work as intended.
#### ENV information
CANN, NNAL version: 8.1.RC1
> [!IMPORTANT]
> PTA 2.5.1 version >= torch_npu-2.5.1.post1.dev20250528 to support NZ
format and calling NNAL operators on 310P
#### Code example
##### Build vllm-ascend from source code
```shell
# download source code as vllm-ascend
cd vllm-ascend
export SOC_VERSION=Ascend310P3
pip install -v -e .
cd ..
```
##### Run offline inference
```python
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
prompts = ["水的沸点是100摄氏度吗？请回答是或者否。", "若腋下体温为38摄氏度，请问这人是否发烧？请回答是或者否。",
"水的沸点是100摄氏度吗？请回答是或者否。", "若腋下体温为38摄氏度，请问这人是否发烧？请回答是或者否。"]
# Create a sampling params object.
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, top_p=0.95, max_tokens=10)
# Create an LLM.
llm = LLM(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct",
max_model_len=4096,
max_num_seqs=4,
dtype="float16", # IMPORTANT cause some ATB ops cannot support bf16 on 310P
disable_custom_all_reduce=True,
trust_remote_code=True,
tensor_parallel_size=2,
compilation_config={"custom_ops":['none', "+rms_norm", "+rotary_embedding"]},
)
# Generate texts from the prompts.
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Vincent Yuan <farawayboat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Yuan <farawayboat@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
1. upgrade vllm to 0.9.1. 0.9.0 is not supported for main branch now.
keep doc to 0.9.0 until we release the first 0.9.1 release.
2. disable V0 test for PR
3. move actionlint check to lint job
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Make sure the lint test passed before start the e2e test to save compute
resource.
Updated the patch doc to make sure the CI works as expect.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove `spec_decode.metrics` patch as this has been resolved in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/16983 (include in vllm
`v0.9.0`).
Returns a CUDA event recording when the copy is complete **--after
modified-->** Returns a device event (NPU Event for vllm-ascend)
recording when the copy is complete.
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
With this PR, we can migrate to the native `data_parallel.py` in vllm
examples and remove the version in vllm-ascend.
At present, `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES` introduces considerable
difficulties; therefore, we must employ a temporary workaround and
manually specify the device.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix typo of VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_OPTIMIZE
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
