verl/examples/ppo_trainer

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a family of policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning, proposed by OpenAI in 2017. PPO strikes a balance between simplicity, stability, and performance, making it one of the most widely used algorithms in modern RL applications, including large-scale language model fine-tuning.

Traditional policy gradient methods like REINFORCE or Vanilla Policy Gradient suffer from:

• High variance and sample inefficiency.
• Instability due to large policy updates.

PPO addresses this problem using a clipped surrogate objective that avoids overly large updates without requiring second-order derivatives.

For more technical details regarding PPO, we suggest reading the introduction in the OpenAI spinning up tutorial, and the paper Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms.

Key Components

• Actor-Critic Architecture: PPO requires both an actor model (policy) and a critic model (value function). This differs from other algorithms like GRPO and RLOO that don't require a critic model.

• Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE): PPO uses GAE for computing advantage values, which helps reduce variance in policy gradient estimates while maintaining low bias.

• Clipped Surrogate Objective: The core of PPO is implemented through the clipped surrogate objective function that limits policy updates.

Configuration

Note that all configs containing micro_batch_size are used to configure the maximum sample or token count per forward or backward pass to avoid GPU OOMs, whose value should not change algorithmic/convergence behavior.

Most critic configs are similar to those of actors. Note that the critic model is omitted from the figure below.

• data.train_batch_size: The global batch size of prompts used to generate a set of sampled trajectories/rollouts. The number of responses/trajectories is data.train_batch_size * actor_rollout.ref.rollout.n

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.ppo_mini_batch_size: The set of sampled trajectories is split into multiple mini-batches with batch_size=ppo_mini_batch_size for PPO actor updates. The ppo_mini_batch_size is a global size across all workers

• actor_rollout_ref.critic.ppo_mini_batch_size: The set of sampled trajectories is split into multiple mini-batches with batch_size=ppo_mini_batch_size for PPO critic updates. The ppo_mini_batch_size is a global size across all workers

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.clip_ratio: The PPO clip range. Default to 0.2

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.ppo_epochs: Number of epochs for PPO updates on one set of sampled trajectories for actor

• critic.ppo_epochs: Number of epochs for PPO updates on one set of sampled trajectories for critic. Defaults to actor_rollout_ref.actor.ppo_epochs

• algorithm.gamma: discount factor

• algorithm.lam: The lambda term that trades off between bias and variance in the GAE estimator

• algorithm.adv_estimator: Support gae, grpo, reinforce_plus_plus, reinforce_plus_plus_baseline, rloo

Advanced Extensions

KL Divergence Control

Options to prevent the policy from diverging too far from a reference policy. Two mechanisms are available: KL reward penalty and KL loss. For more technical details, see Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback

Options to use KL loss for KL divergence control:

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.use_kl_loss: to use kl loss in the actor. When used, we are not applying KL in the reward function. Default is False

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.kl_loss_coef: The coefficient of kl loss. Default is 0.001.

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.kl_loss_type: Support kl(k1), abs, mse(k2), low_var_kl(k3) and full. Appending "+" in the end (e.g., 'k1+' and 'k3+') would apply straight through to employ k2 for unbiased gradient estimation, regardless of the kl value estimation (see https://github.com/volcengine/verl/pull/2953#issuecomment-3162113848 for more details). How to calculate the kl divergence between actor and reference policy. See this blog post for detailed analysis: http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html

Options to use KL penalty in the reward:

• algorithm.use_kl_in_reward: Whether to enable in-reward kl penalty. Default is False.

• algorithm.kl_penalty: Support kl(k1), abs, mse(k2), low_var_kl(k3) and full. This defines the way to calculate the kl divergence between actor and reference policy. For specific options, refer to kl_penalty in core_algos.py. See this blog post for detailed analysis: http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html

• algorithm.kl_ctrl.kl_coef: The (initial) coefficient of in-reward kl_penalty. Default is 0.001.

• algorithm.kl_ctrl.type: 'fixed' for FixedKLController and 'adaptive' for AdaptiveKLController.

• algorithm.kl_ctrl.horizon: See source code of AdaptiveKLController for details.

• algorithm.kl_ctrl.target_kl: See source code of AdaptiveKLController for details.

Dual-clip PPO

The Dual-Clip PPO introduces a approach by applying a lower bound to the policy ratio when the advantage is less than zero, when multiplied by a large raito, does not exceed a specified lower bound.

• actor_rollout_ref.actor.clip_ratio_c: lower bound of the value for Dual-clip PPO, defaults to 3.0

Reference Example

Qwen2.5 training log and commands: link

bash run_gemma.sh
  trainer.n_gpus_per_node=1 \
  actor_rollout_ref.rollout.tensor_model_parallel_size=1 \
  trainer.logger=console \
  critic.model.path=Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
  actor_rollout_ref.model.path=Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
  data.train_batch_size=256 \
  actor_rollout_ref.actor.ppo_mini_batch_size=64 \
  actor_rollout_ref.actor.ppo_micro_batch_size=2 \
  critic.ppo_micro_batch_size=2

Reference performance with verl v0.2:

Model	Method	Score	Link
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct	pretrained model	36.4	Qwen Blog
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct	PPO	56.7	PPO Command and Logs