Update all model references in use_model.md to use Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B
as specifically requested by qgallouedec.
Changes:
- Replace Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B with Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B in all 3 locations
- Simpler model reference consistent with reviewer's suggestion
Address reviewer feedback by replacing trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-XPO with the
official Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B model in all use_model.md examples.
Changes:
- Replace model references in 3 locations to use Qwen organization model
- More consistent with rest of TRL documentation
- Less misleading than custom trl-lib namespace model
Resolves#4385
- Replace edbeeching/gpt-neo-125M-imdb with trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-XPO in peft_integration.md
- Replace kashif/stack-llama-2 with trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-XPO in use_model.md (3 occurrences)
- All personal developer namespace models now use common trl-lib namespace
* Compatibilitywith padding free and iterable dataset
* Fix collator test
* add a test for streaming
* some cleaning
* improve and fix tests
* tiny revert
* bump datasets to 3.0.0
* Added else clause to avoid NameError on optimizer_offload
* Accounted for deepspeed's renaming in 0.16.4
* Switched to packaging.version.parse over the (broken) tuple split
* Moved from NotImplementedError to RuntimeError in else clause
* Add support for additional generation kwargs in GRPO Trainer
- Extend GRPOConfig to support additional generation kwargs
- Update GRPOTrainer to incorporate additional generation parameters
- Add tests for training with additional generation kwargs for both standard and vLLM modes
* Add missing vllm_gpu_memory_utilization=0.5
* 🔧 Refactor GRPO generation parameters and configuration
- Restructure GRPOConfig to separate generation parameters
- Add support for top_p, top_k, min_p, repetition_penalty, and length_penalty
- Remove additional_generation_kwargs in favor of explicit parameters
- Update GRPOTrainer to use new generation parameter configuration
* Update tests
* Remove length_penalty and fix tests
* Update defaults and docs
- Change temperature type from Optional[float] to float
- Set default top_p to 1.0 instead of None
- Simplify parameter descriptions by removing redundant "if set to None" text
- Maintain consistent type hints and default values for generation parameters
* GRPO remove optional type hint for temperature parameter
* Remove length_penalty from sampling_kwargs dict in GRPOTrainer
* some refactoring
* top k None support
* change value of in test to amke them work
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Veres <robert.veres@languagetool.org>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <gallouedec.quentin@gmail.com>
* Deprecate liger
* remove import
* oops, shouldn't be here
* Fix other deprecations
* remove liger from gkd for now
* remove liger for teacher
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* Fix logits computation in DPO trainer prediction step
* fix compute_metrics for bco and test
* same for cpo
* same from dpo
* for kto
* anf finally orpo
* Apply style fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: kyungdae-jo <kyungdae.jo@navercorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <gallouedec.quentin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* ✨ Enhance GRPO logging with configurable completions sampling
- Update `GRPOConfig` to replace `log_completions` with `log_completions_steps`
- Add `print_prompt_completions_sample()` utility function for rich console logging
- Modify `GRPOTrainer` to additionally print 5 random prompt-completion pairs every log_completions_steps steps
* GRPO trainer completions logging, move wandb checks together
* Add rich availability check and use fallback in print_prompt_completions_sample when rich is not available
* Update docstrings on print_prompt_completions_sample
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Revert back to simple log_completions bool
* GRPO log completions fully
* Remove print fallback from print_prompt_completions_sample
* Move accelerator main process check up for grpo log completions
* Explicit variable names in print_prompt_completions_sample
* Make GRPOConfig docstring match field description
* Update log_completions docs again
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update GRPOConfig docs to match field
* improve readibility when prompt or completions are multilines
* log reward
* prevent hanging, don't print without rich, print reward
* style
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Veres <robert.veres@languagetool.org>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <gallouedec.quentin@gmail.com>
* Add num_updates and epsilon parameters to GRPOConfig and GRPOTrainer
* test sampler
* update the loss computation
* fix eval sampler
* should work now
* buffer inputs with grad accum
* optimize when num_iterations == 1
* test
* minor comment removal and fix log metric
* beta position
* clarify comment [ci skip]
* clarify sampler doc [ci skip]
* fix collision with eval logging
* clarify
* 🔧 Optimize GRPO training by conditionally loading reference model based on beta value
* ✅ Add test for GRPOTrainer with beta=0 to ensure no reference model and KL divergence
* 🔧 Refactor GRPOTrainer code for improved readability and maintainability
* 🔧 Simplify per_token_loss calculation in GRPOTrainer for clarity
* fix test, style, and some struct for clarity
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* return dataset if it's preprocessed
* add is_processed flag variable
* add test
* move test_sft_trainer_directly_with_pretokenized_data to Tester2
* Update sft_trainer.py
* no need for padding and truncation
* minor reorganization
* Update trl/trainer/sft_trainer.py
* let the collator pad
* style
* fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* fix check for AutoLigerKernelForCausalLM
* fix case where AutoLigerKernelForCausalLM is not defined
* update min liger version
* formatting
* fix win CI
- Fixed a bug where an extra `len` call inside the error message caused a `TypeError` instead of the expected `ValueError`.
- Replaced `len(len(args.reward_weights))` with the correct `len(args.reward_weights)` to properly calculate the number of reward weights.
- Ensured that a `ValueError` is now raised with an accurate and clear message when the number of reward weights does not match the number of reward functions.
This fix prevents confusion during debugging and ensures proper error handling during validation.
Tested with cases where:
- `args.reward_weights` is None (default case).
- `args.reward_weights` has mismatched lengths with `reward_funcs`.
* added reward weights for multi-reward runs in GRPO
* reward_weights are float, moved from GRPOTrainer to GRPOConfig
* minor comment fix
* minor
* fix test
* missing link
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* add token accuracy metric
* fix return type
* shift tokens
* use compute_loss so that the model is called only once
* add to logs
* log from main process
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Distribute
* fix some logic errors
* fix and document RepeatRandomSampler
* comment
* doc clarification
* fix type hint
* more readable
* fix eval
* fix tests
* roll back to distribute generation
* improve comment [ci skip]
* fix slice
* catch for eval batch size as well; fix completion_ids in vllm
* log completions
* Revert "log completions"
This reverts commit 1e4af8ffb8dda15d7596e707ac784208db88135a.
* Before the first training step, the model has no optimizer: fix ds3
* properly unwrap torch.compile-ed models with GRPO
* add test and compat with reward models
* ignore test windows
* properly unwrap torch.compile-ed models with GRPO
* add test and compat with reward models
* ignore test windows
* chore: lint
* style
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* [DOCS] add GRPOTrainer to README.md
I replaced RLOOTrainer with GRPOTrainer because you thought you might want to keep it limited, but let me know if you want both.
* Update README.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* add eval loss logging during predition
* make sure the train and eval logs aren't mixed
* test grpo in eval
* fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* rloo custom reward function and test
* idont even know why i did that
* removing get_reward_custom
* remove get_reward_custom test
* fix code quality check
* adding test
* end this mysery already
* fix test
* initial commit
* doc on custom reward function
* test
* doc doc doc
* fix collator
* style
* links?
* I need a docdoc 🎵
* fix link
* I do like writing doc tbh
* it takes time, but it's worth it
* no return!
* type hint
* it's probably the best of both worlds [ci skip]
* new doc before implementation
* tests
* more doc
* style
* multiple pretrained funcs
* fix arg name
* main?
* example for R1
* fix script
* clearer
* import [ci skip]
* Update docs/source/grpo_trainer.md
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* init grpo [ci skip]
* initial version
* refine args defs
* model card
* initial doc
* fix badges
* fix spaces
* try link to super in doc
* temperature, fix indexing, and std=0.0
* grpo script for cli
* peft support
* move data preparation in `compute_loss`
* weird doc trial
* fix device and some logging
* unwrap_model_for_generation for distributed setting
* Compat with distrib training
* revert grpo config doc trial (didn't work)
* test
* allow model to be str and processing_class to be none; fix loss computation
* advantage is always 0.0: don't log
* fix peft not installed
* proper reward model for testing
* fix script for cli
* add trl grpo to cli doc
* test peft
* flush left
* fix reward calculation
* new reward model
* support any reward model
* fix reward processing class def
* log reward std
* fix reward logging
* fix grad computation
* skip embed layer in test
* remove optimizer_cls_and_kwargs
* improve GRPO default args
* reduce mem usage for grpo test
* reduce mem usage in test grpo
* reduce memory usage for test
* Fix the test
* remove redondant
* fix min version
* Update test_grpo_trainer.py
* Update test_grpo_trainer.py
* Fix test, finally found the solution!
* some doc
* Update doc-builder workflow to use specific commit sha
* more doc
* advantages
* drop cancel fo no grad
* logged metrics [ci skip]
* completion col is ignored [ci skip]
* fix latex
* double space? ~?
* try a latex fix
* with branch
* Empty commit
* Empty commit
* double space seems to be the solution
* set default for max_length and max prompt lenngth and add guidelines for defaults
* remove dep kwargs
* truncate prompt in prm
* Update CONTRIBUTING.md [ci skip]
* vllm online dpo
* new arg and add back generation config [skip ci]
* import utils
* optional import and comment
* is_vllm_available
* support conv and not conv [ci skip]
* add old code back
* use func [skip ci]
* fix _generate call
* fix and dedicated func
* top k 50
* style
* add import error
* new testing model
* Update OnlineDPOTrainer class with new features
* test vllm
* fix generate tiny script
* max len arg
* fix comment [ci skip]
* revert num_return_sequences
* vllm dep
* Add require_torch_accelerator import and skip test if vllm is not available
* proper require_torch_accelerator
* add vllm section
* Add hfoption sections to speeding_up_training.md
* no, an id
* Update vllm dependency to exclude Windows platform
* Note on future release
* style
* adding readme for ultrafeedback dataset
* using ModelCard as DatasetsCard like hf datasets is understaffed
* more info in readme.md of the dataset
* generated readme for all dataset scripts
* precommit
* fixing test
* md format; corrections; generation script link
* some collections
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* padding free
* specify dtype
* test
* warnings when not flash attention
* fix test
* remove
* docstring padding-free
* flash-attn dep
* Stronger warning
* require_flash_attn in test
* flash-attn in CI
* rm flash-attn from dep
* Remove flash-attn dependency from test workflows
* refactor
* Update .github/workflows/tests.yml
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* drop require flash-attn
* fix dtype
* refine warning
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_config.py
* Add logic to compute mean logits for chosen and rejected tokens with padding-free
* format
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* fix comment [ci skip]
* fix num logits to keep
* Implemented integration with Comet in `LogCompletionsCallback`. Implemented related integration test.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `CPOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `CPOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `DPOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `BCOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `KTOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Implemented integration with Comet in `ORPOTrainer.evaluation_loop()` during logging of `game_log` table.
* Added support for Comet URL integration into model cards created by trainers.
* Moved `get_comet_experiment_url()` into utils.py
* Updated Comet badge in the model card to use PNG image instead of text.
* Fixed bug related to running PPO example during model saving. The error as following: 'GPTNeoXForCausalLM' object has no attribute 'policy'. Introduced guard check that attribute `policy` exists.
* Implemented utility method to handle logging of tabular data to the Comet experiment.
* Implemented logging of the completions table to Comet by `PPOTrainer`.
* Implemented logging of the completions table to Comet by `WinRateCallback`.
* Implemented logging of the completions table to Comet by `RLOOTrainer` and `RewardTrainer`.
* Restored line to the main branch version.
* Moved Comet related utility methods into `trainer/utils.py` to resolve merge conflict with master branch,
* Update trl/trainer/utils.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Implemented raising of `ModuleNotFoundError` error when logging table to Comet if `comet-ml` is not installed.
* import comet with other imports
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* initial skeleton
* tokenize fn
* adding bos and eos to tokenization fn
* prmtrainer
* fixing small typo in tokenize
* typo in input_ids and labels construction
* numpy dimension
* introduce the stepwise reward trainer
* update markdown files
* let user decide post step separator in config
* doc post_step_separator
* do not add post step_tokens to last step of the reasoning process
* renaming prm to stepwisereward
* formatting
* fix tokenize kwargs
* adapt test to the new post_token args
* adding example script
* fix small typo
* add create_model_card and renaming
* fixing booleans
* Adding the new stepwise_preference instead of placeholders for datasets
* formatting
* Update docs/source/_toctree.yml
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update examples/scripts/stepwise_reward_modeling.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/stepwise_reward_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/stepwise_reward_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* update push to hub
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* step_separator can't be None
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix suggested typos
* add citation
* reformat doc
* reordering init
* push to hub prm800k
* changing dataset in example
* change dataset format to align with the sky is blue example
* fix tokenization column names
* fix num labels in openai example
* add support for conversational dataset
* remove training whitespace
* replace tokenizer with processing class
* Update docs/source/dataset_formats.mdx
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* remove openai_prm800k
* Update trl/trainer/stepwise_reward_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/stepwise_reward_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update docs/source/stepwise_reward_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update docs/source/stepwise_reward_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* renaming
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* renaming
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* minor renamings in docs
* using prm800k instead of openai_prm800k
* update num labels to 2 following the new format
* changing doc examples to math examples
* change reference to dataset_formats.mdx
* changing dataset config in test
* remove conversational dataset support
* remove conv dataset support
* fix bos token
* fix scriptarguments in example
* completion to completions
* remove valuerror for step_separator inside steps
* run precommit
* remove conv dataset support
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* renaming zen dataset
* remove unused printing
* unknown label column
* introduce the train on last step arg
* _tokenize support train_on_last_step
* incorporate train_on_last_step to tests
* formatting
* remove comments in trainer
* Refactor `tokenize_row`
* Update max_completion_length parameter in StepwiseRewardConfig
* Collator
* Update comment
* Update type hint
* fix table
* Remove collator
* don't need pad token id
* add error back
* max length args
* use tokenizer arg
* Update doc
* label -> labels
* fixing tokenization issues in tokenize row
* correct labels for token classification
* adding max_length to tokenize_row
* reformat tests
* adding tests for tokenize row
* fixing typos in comments
* update doc
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* Add math_shepherd.py script for dataset processing
* split the dataset
* formatting
* same evaluation method for the two training methods
* adding filtering to example script
* formatting
* Add features to avoid casting labels to bool in dataset tokenization
* Update docs/source/stepwise_reward_trainer.mdx [ci skip]
* Add learning_rate parameter to StepwiseRewardConfig class
* update doc
* Remove unused setup_chat_format function
* Fix warning message in stepwise_reward_modeling.py
* Update logging steps in stepwise_reward_trainer.mdx
* little doc change [ci skip]
* Fix copyrights
* fix space after copyrights
* Update dataset loading in stepwise_reward_modeling.py
* refine compute_accuracy and proper test
* fix tests
* style
* renamings
* renaming in init
* doc renaming
* fix sorting and tag
* experiemental [ci skip]
* trigger CI
* other doc fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* function calling training support for SFTTraining
* adding tool support to data_utils
* adding test for function calling tokenizer
* reverting changes to sfttrainer and config,added maybe_apply_chat_template
* arg for maybe_apply_chat_templates docstring
* Doc sectioning
* minor test modification
* minor doc modification
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* refactor parser
* Only document some methods
* Update imports in cli_utils.py and remove config option in utils.py
* add `test_parse_args_and_arg_override_config` and remove unnecessary mocks [ci skip]
* fix comment [ci skip]
* fix comment [ci skip]
* Extra arg in config also returned
* fix docstring [ci skip]
* add mock back
* use `deprecate_kwarg`
* Add guidelines for working with warnings in the codebase
* Remove unnecessary warnings and improve code initialization
* Fix warnings and improve accuracy calculation
* Add rich library dependency for text formatting
* Update LoRA weight loading warning message
* Fix logging and import issues in AlignPropConfig
* Fix warnings and improve code readability
* Remove unused import statements
* Refactor CPOTrainer class in cpo_trainer.py
* Remove unnecessary warnings and raise ValueError for missing model
* Fix warnings and improve code consistency
* Update CONTRIBUTING.md to clarify the purpose of warnings
* Fix string formatting in DataCollatorForCompletionOnlyLM class
* Update SimPO loss parameters in CPOTrainer
* Fix warnings and remove unnecessary code in ConstantLengthDataset class
* Clarify warning guidelines
* Rewrite the entire section
* Fix capitalization in CONTRIBUTING.md
* Fix formatting in CONTRIBUTING.md
* Add script_utils.md to the documentation
* Refactor ScriptArguments class documentation
* Refactor TrlParser class to improve code organization and readability
* first commit
* uncomment
* other tests adaptations
* Remove unused variable in test_setup_chat_format
* Remove unused import statement
* style
* Add Bart model
* Update BCOTrainerTester class in test_bco_trainer.py
* Update model IDs and tokenizers in test files
* Add new models and processors
* Update model IDs in test files
* Fix formatting issue in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Refactor dataset formatting in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Fix dataset sequence length in SFTTrainerTester
* Remove tokenizer
* Remove print statement
* Add reward_model_path and sft_model_path to PPO trainer
* Fix tokenizer padding issue
* Add chat template for testing purposes in PaliGemma model
* Update PaliGemma model and chat template
* Increase learning rate to speed up test
* Update model names in run_dpo.sh and run_sft.sh scripts
* Update model and dataset names
* Fix formatting issue in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Fix formatting issue in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Remove unused chat template
* Update model generation script
* additional models
* Update model references in test files
* Remove unused imports in test_online_dpo_trainer.py
* Add is_llm_blender_available import and update reward_tokenizer
* Refactor test_online_dpo_trainer.py: Move skipped test case decorator
* remove models without chat templates
* Update model names in scripts and tests
* Update model_id in test_modeling_value_head.py
* Update model versions in test files
* Fix formatting issue in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Update embedding model ID in BCOTrainerTester
* Update test_online_dpo_trainer.py with reward model changes
* Update expected formatted text in test_dataset_formatting.py
* Add reward_tokenizer to TestOnlineDPOTrainer
* fix tests
* Add SIMPLE_CHAT_TEMPLATE to T5 tokenizer
* Fix dummy_text format in test_rloo_trainer.py
* Skip outdated test for chatML data collator
* Add new vision language models
* Commented out unused model IDs in test_vdpo_trainer
* Update model and vision configurations in generate_tiny_models.py and test_dpo_trainer.py
* Update model and tokenizer references
* Don't push if it already exists
* Add comment explaining test skip
* Fix model_exists function call and add new models
* Update LlavaForConditionalGeneration model and processor
* `qgallouedec` -> `trl-internal-testing`
* Create mergekit_utils.py
* adding mergekit as an optional dependancy
* adding MergeModel to callbacks
* adding mergekit_utils dependencies to callbacks
* setting lower bound for mergekit
* setting mergekit lower band to 0.0.5.1
* adding support for MergeModelCallBack __init__.py
* adding support for mergemodelcallback
* mergemodelcallback tests
* Update callbacks.py
* Update __init__.py
* Update __init__.py
* Update test_callbacks.py
* Update trl/trainer/callbacks.py
removing ## from docs
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/trainer/callbacks.py
removing ## from docs
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/trainer/callbacks.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* using different dataset for tests
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/mergekit_utils.py
adding types
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/mergekit_utils.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* replacing get_last_checkpoint
* renaming Merge to merge_models
* setting mergers default value to linear
* removing unnecessary docs and comments
* adding docstring to Mergeconfig
* adding mergekits link to docstring
* precommit
* removing duplicated import
* typos in mergekit_utils docstring
* fixing tests
* making mergemodelcallback tests optional
* Make import optional
* minor
* use tmp dir in test
* sort
* Add import error checks for mergekit extra
* use a common _merge_and_maybe_push method and compat with windows path
* debug windows
* Update dependencies for mergekit and add test dependencies
* Add assertion to check if merged folder exists in the last checkpoint
* Fix temporary directory cleanup in test_callbacks.py
* Add sys import and skip test for Python versions below 3.10 due to cleanup errors with temp dir
* revert change for debug
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* Fix "Use specified data_collator instead of hard-coding the option"
* Remove query_responses = [] since it's immediately overwritten afterwards.
* Use self.data_collator
* Use specified data_collator instead of hard-coded one in PPOTrainer
* Move the data_collator creation
* Run make precommit
* Support num_logits_to_keep, which computes necessary logits in the forward pass.
* update doc
* bug fix
* update
* check is model supports num_logits_to_keep
* ruff format
* update test file
* peft model support
* test passed
* update
* apply use_num_logits_to_keep
* fix num_logits_to_keep compute bug
* compare all outputs
* pytest
* pass test
* use check_min_version
* format
* test_dpo_trainer_use_num_logits_to_keep passed
* add some comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* Bump dev version to `0.13.0.dev0`
* Update version number to 0.12 in CITATION.cff
* 🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)
* Update judge examples and documentation
* without ':'
* Clean doc
* Fix typo in example code
* Add space after Attributes
* Update attribute name in judges.py
* Add installation instructions for llm-blender library
* Update PairRMJudge attributes documentation
* Fix return type in PairRMJudge
* Revert "🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)"
This reverts commit 337005d95169371935fb87f1c559c7412f8472a4.
* Revert "🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)"
This reverts commit 337005d95169371935fb87f1c559c7412f8472a4.
* 🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)
* Update judge examples and documentation
* without ':'
* Clean doc
* Fix typo in example code
* Add space after Attributes
* Update attribute name in judges.py
* Add installation instructions for llm-blender library
* Update PairRMJudge attributes documentation
* Fix return type in PairRMJudge
* Bump dev version to `0.13.0.dev0`
* Update version number to 0.12 in CITATION.cff
* Add publication date to blog post
* 🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)
* Update judge examples and documentation
* without ':'
* Clean doc
* Fix typo in example code
* Add space after Attributes
* Update attribute name in judges.py
* Add installation instructions for llm-blender library
* Update PairRMJudge attributes documentation
* Fix return type in PairRMJudge
* Revert "🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)"
This reverts commit 337005d95169371935fb87f1c559c7412f8472a4.
* Update blog post publication dates
* revert to p5
* Update image URLs in index.mdx
* Sort and uniform thumbnail
* Update image alignment in index.mdx
* Bump dev version to `0.13.0.dev0`
* Update version number to 0.12 in CITATION.cff
* 🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)
* Update judge examples and documentation
* without ':'
* Clean doc
* Fix typo in example code
* Add space after Attributes
* Update attribute name in judges.py
* Add installation instructions for llm-blender library
* Update PairRMJudge attributes documentation
* Fix return type in PairRMJudge
* Revert "🧽 Fix judge documentation (#2318)"
This reverts commit 337005d95169371935fb87f1c559c7412f8472a4.
* Add conditional check for LLMBlender availability in test_judges.py
* Fix import issues and update test requirements
* Remove unused imports
* Add require_peft decorator to test cases
* Fix import_utils module to use correct package name for llm_blender
* Found min version and test
* Update Slack notification titles
* Update dependencies versions
* Update GitHub Actions workflow to include setup.py and reorder file paths
* Revert "Update Slack notification titles"
This reverts commit be02a7f2de87905e86a847540770968d0416934a.
* Update Slack notification titles
* Remove pull_request branch restriction in tests.yml
* add check code quality back
* Fix PairRMJudge model loading issue
* Add conditional check for LLMBlender availability in test_judges.py
* Fix import issues and update test requirements
* Remove unused imports
* Add require_peft decorator to test cases
* Fix import_utils module to use correct package name for llm_blender
* Update trainer_utils import and save strategy in online_dpo_trainer.py
* fix back-compat for online-dpo
* better comment
* Update transformers dependency to commit f33904
* clean deps
* new tests
* tests
* Add tests without optional dependencies workflow
* Update dependencies in tests.yml
* cpu version of torch
* Update dependencies and installation commands
* Disable fail-fast in test workflow
* Update test matrix in workflows file
* try fix windows
* Remove "rich" from required packages in setup.py
* Update dependency installation in tests.yml
* Add torch and deepspeed installation for windows-latest
* Fix conditional statement in workflow file
* Add torch and deepspeed installation for Windows
* Fix if statement
* Update torch and deepspeed dependencies
* Update liger package requirement for non-Windows platforms
* remove scipy dep
* Add torch GPU requirement for testing_utils
* Update trl/trainer/judges.py
* Refactor reward processing in OnlineDPOTrainer
* Refactor completion decoding and reward processing
* remove strip
* remove warning
* Add reward_tokenizer to training script
* Add reward_tokenizer and reward_processing_class to OnlineDPOTrainer test
* propagate to xpo and nash
* style
* reduce memory requirement with inference_mode
* fix tests
* pairrm judge llmblender
* setUpClass(cls)
* Add setUpClass method to TestJudges class
* truncation left for reward tokenizer
* don't logcompletion without eval dataset
* only eval when possible
* use the pair-judges
* add test
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* decode and skip special characters
* initial nash
* return tensors
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* add back the logging
* use batch_decode
* add judges api to XPO trainer
* Update tests/test_online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* judge in examples
* judge in config
* add back logs when using reward model
* typo
* add back model_scores logging when using reward model
* log scores for reward model only
* better cond on what to log
* same for rlhf reward
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* use decode_and_strip_padding
* error if both reward and judge or none are set
* remove unused check
* Uniform way to pass conversation into judge
* heading -> leading
* LogCompletionsCallback compat with online method
* Update Online DPO doc
* check if data is conversational for judges
* update example
* remove comment
* use zip
* fix stats xpo
* Replace judge with PairRMJudge and import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
* update xpo documentation
* Remove doc duplication
* update nash doc
* XPO trl chat
* nash md doc
* HfPairwiseJudge
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* `get_batch_sample` -> `generate_from_model[_and_ref]`
* add `num_items_in_batch=None`
* `num_items_in_batch` in `training_step`
* Fix return type hint
* desc for unpair dataset util
* update example
* process in KTO
* Update doc
* KTO doc rewrite
* fix orpo doc
* add other dataset config names in test
* update doc image
* fix links in doc
* Update reward and log probability metrics in KTOTrainer doc
* skip enc-dec test
* Update docs/source/kto_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* setup_chat_format: throw error if there was already a template
* fix lint
* clarify in docs
* fix test?
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* in progress
* refactor concatenated_inputs and concatenated_forward
* progress
* further modif
* padding side
* eos prompt enc dec
* prompt_padding_side
* drop prompt apdding side collator
* working on decoder only
* dpo trainer
* Fix loss_mask type conversion bug
* bad attention mask
* try to get the same tokens as main
* fix loss mask
* fix unused col
* added comment
* raise error when paddind token not set
* remove private method tests
* initial vlm support
* make it work for paligemma
* minor test updates
* style
* improve readibility
* improve doc
* style
* flush left and truncate
* flush left in the code
* fix empty_cols and make max_length optional
* always add eos token
* minor changes and doc
* style
* fix docstring
* preference collator in doc
* fix doc
* optional max_completion_length
* Investigating CI failing
* style
* just dpo trainer test
* just idefics
* paligemma
* llava
* test cli
* dataset in test
* all tests
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
* reference to ref
* rich descriptions
* fix logits reporting
* fix truncation
* remove chat template from dpo_vlm
* `get_batch_sample` -> `generate_from_model[_and_ref]`
* add `num_items_in_batch=None`
* `num_items_in_batch` in `training_step`
* Fix return type hint
* test tokenize row
* fix test
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update log_example_reports.py
1. Added logging: Imported the logging module and set up a logger in the main function. This allows for better error tracking and debugging.
2. Improved file reading: Used a with statement to ensure the file is properly closed after reading. Also added error handling to catch and log any issues when reading the file.
3. Error handling for Slack SDK import: Added a try-except block to handle cases where the slack_sdk might not be installed.
4. Enhanced Slack message sending: Added error handling and logging for the Slack message sending process. This will help identify any issues with the Slack integration.
* style
* Update log_reports.py
1. Logging: Added logging to track errors and important events.
2. Error Handling: Wrapped the log file processing in a try-except block to handle potential errors gracefully.
3. Logging Total Failed Tests: Added a log statement to report the total number of failed tests
* style
* further improve
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* `DPOScriptArguments` to `ScriptArguments`
* use dataset_train_split
* Use scriptarguments
* dataset names in command lines
* use `ScriptArguments` everywhere
* ignore biais buffer to end
* remove in v0.13
* rm comment
* update test commands
* Update docs/source/rloo_trainer.md
* Update tests/test_rloo_trainer.py
* Added dataset_train_split argument to ppo.py and rloo.py
* update scripts with dataset_train_split
* Updated README.md with CLI examples and additional usage instructions
Added Command Line Interface (CLI) examples for SFT, DPO, and Chat features.
Improved the "How to Use" section by providing code examples for SFTTrainer and RewardTrainer.
Included installation instructions for both Python Package and source-based installation.
Refined highlights to better showcase efficiency and scalability features.
Updated the repository clone instructions for working with examples.
Added new links to CLI documentation and contribution guide for better navigation.
* Update README.md
* Update README.md
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update README.md
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update README.md
* update badges
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* Update log_example_reports.py
1. Added logging: Imported the logging module and set up a logger in the main function. This allows for better error tracking and debugging.
2. Improved file reading: Used a with statement to ensure the file is properly closed after reading. Also added error handling to catch and log any issues when reading the file.
3. Error handling for Slack SDK import: Added a try-except block to handle cases where the slack_sdk might not be installed.
4. Enhanced Slack message sending: Added error handling and logging for the Slack message sending process. This will help identify any issues with the Slack integration.
* style
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* Update incorrect data processing in DataCollatorForChatML
Fix the extra BOS token and the absence of an EOS token in the returned input_ids, and potentially the absence of a target string in the returned labels.
* Update trl/trainer/utils.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* style
* move comment
* add test for DataCollatorForChatML
* update comment with more details
* update assert reports and comments, and adds verification that the last token of input_ids should be EOS token
* new line at the end of file for code quality
* Update tests/test_utils.py
* Update tests/test_utils.py
* Update tests/test_utils.py
* update tests
* fix test
* Update tests/test_utils.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update tests/test_utils.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* formatting
* fix typo
* simplify
* Revert "simplify"
This reverts commit 7e4006c87265665183032932ca05dffef567e38b.
* tokenize full messages
* dont add eos
* eos is in the last token
* simplify DataCollatorForChatML
* Update tests/test_utils.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* Update README.md
Fix grammatical errors in README.md
fixes issue #2185
Description:
I found a grammatical error in the README.md of the project. This PR fixes the error to improve the overall readability and clarity of the documentation.
Changes:
Corrected grammatical errors
Updated lines to reflect the correct grammar
Reasoning: The original text contained a grammatical error that could confuse readers. This fix ensures that the documentation is accurate and easy to understand.
Closes#2185
* Update README.md
Co-authored-by: Edward Beeching <edbeeching@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Edward Beeching <edbeeching@users.noreply.github.com>
* add argument for dropout
* increase default lr
* change default lr in examples
* fix bug in calculation of KL batch size
* KL batch size should be args.per_device_train_batch_size
* Update kto_trainer.mdx with hparam recs
* typo
* allow dropout to be disabled
* update lr in sample scrippt
* Update kto_config.py
* Update trl/trainer/kto_trainer.py
* Update docs/source/kto_trainer.mdx
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* clarify ConstantLengthDataset usage
* dont provide dataset text field when formatting func is provided
* kto maybe_apply_chat_template
* default text field
* doc
* remove maybe_apply_chat_template from kto example
* dataset text field always a str
* remove `dataset_text_field="text"`
* update doc
* conversational dataset support for dpo
* support standard dataset for extract prompt
* test standard dataset for extract prompt
* fix maybe
* fix maybe apply prompt
* style
* overwrite default learning rate of DPO
* style
* rlaif script
* `writer_batch_size` in `train_test_split`
* initial dpo doc refactoring
* vision data section in doc
* lil format modif
* refine Vision datasets
* refine doc
* test new loss type format
* restrcture loss function
* table loss type
* simplify `unsloth`
* improve doc
* looged metrics up
* refine loss section
* Fix label_smoothing parameter in DPOConfig
* dataset for test
* update readme
* Update docs/source/dpo_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* try colorized code block
* refine doc style
* further refine doc
* Update docs/source/dpo_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* re add pali gemma test
* Add missing period
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* tokenize while training
* same for nashmd and xpo
* Update trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
The function _process_tokens in trl/trainers/kto_trainer.py crashes if the prompt_input_ids are an empty list.
- added a check for nonzero length
- added a check for nonzero length of answer_input_ids for consistency
The checks happen when determining when subtracting 1 from max_length (happens when BOS or EOS is already present).
* fix neftune_noise_alpha
* del neftune_noise_alpha first
* check len after removing handle
* make sure we do not load twice
* Update trl/trainer/sft_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* remove neftune from SFTTrainer as the superclass has it now
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* learning rate recomentations for kto
* update from suggestion
* override default lr
* add tip tag
* Update trl/trainer/kto_config.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* make Orpotrainer run faster on tpu
* less data transfer
* train-trl.py
* fix
* set device_map=auto
* add is_torch_xla_available guards
* delete file
* address comments
* make presubmit
* Update transformer version in setup.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* initial xpo trainer
* compute rewards and ref log probs in smaller batches
* add logging
* initial log docs
* fix global_step increment
* fix metric descriptions
* use messages API
* use training_step API
* fix logs
* add test
* add back max_new_tokens
* use max_new_tokens
* refactor
* top_k is an int
* fix formatting
* fix the loss
* fix logging
* fix logging
* fix logging
* fix loss
* calcuate pi_log_ratio once
* fix stats
* fix loss
* do not log loss again
* fix docs
* add disable_dropout_in_model via flag
* comments
* revert doc change
* rm empty cache in online dpo
* improve doc xpo config
* some comment
* fix loggings stats
* fix docs
* save the model
* fix model and reward model
* Update trl/trainer/xpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Subtract a penalty from OnPolicy Trainers if output does not contain an EOS token
* Caught a few other problems
* Updated the documentation for RLOO trainer and PPOv2Trainer
* Corrected the default type and value for missing_eos_penalty
* Made RLOO Trainer consistent with Online DPO and PPOv2
* Removed --non_eos_penalty from all documentation
* Made missing_eos_penalty examples positive (because we subtract).
* Caught two more incorrect examples
* Removed unnecessary whitespace to make ruff happy
* Update trl/trainer/utils.py
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* drop canonical
* Delete ultrafeedback_prompt_only.py dataset script
* reduce dif in best_of_n
* try to revert best_of_n to make github happy
* anyway...
* fix: prevent unpackaging error due to additional **aux_loss** returned by **concatenated_forward** function when **aux_loss_enabled** is set to True.
* Refactor: Simplify tuple unpacking in `concatenated_forward` call in `get_batch_loss_metrics` function
* Refactor: improve code quality
* fix dataset and value error in sft
* Update trl/trainer/sft_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* move the test to the right place
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* correct formatting of star sign in kto_trainer.mdx
The "*" symbol in markdown doesn't show. I changed it to $\times$ so the mathematical formula is clearer
* fix markdown
* one more try
* feat : add kto command
* feat : add support for apo loss in KTO Trainer
* feat : make kto script compatible with dpo-formatted datasets
* fix: lint data utils
* add loss_type in kto test
* fix: data utils docstrings
* fix: add dataset reformat test
* fix: lint tests
* fix: only reference kl_logps if needed
---------
Co-authored-by: Karel D'Oosterlinck <karel@contextual.ai>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* tokenize and process DPO data via batches
* use helpers
* updated _process_tokens
* fixed
* incorporate build_tokenized_answer in the _tokenizer
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix tokenizer for is_vision_model
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* give the _tokenize the tokenizer as well as optional processor
* fix tests
* add bos and eos tokens
* add prompt_pixel_attention_mask
* Update trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
* truncate by max_length
* formatting
* fix for enc-dec
* For encoder-decoder models, we need to use the prepared decoder_input_ids
* add tests for _build_tokenized_answer and _tokenize_feature
* check for EOS and BOS tokens
* formatting
* do not include pixel mask if they are not provided
* undo refactor
* undo add_bos_token_if_needed change
* refactor tokenizer into smaller helpers
* add back comments
* fix type hints
* format
* fix t5 tests
* args are never optional
* move cat to appropriate helper
* fix _truncate_tokens
* add tests for _truncate_tokens
* remove dead code
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Test for #1970
* style
* drop last element in the batch for test
* check prompt_input_ids not modified
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* Fix issue with precompute_ref_log_probs not working when rpo_alpha is None
* Test: Add test for precompute_ref_log_probs with rpo_alpha=None
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* fix model to save in ppov2
currently saving self.backup_model but this should be self.model
self.backup_model is only a temp model used to store the policy and
value function whereas self.model should have just the policy to save
* simplified logic
* remove unused ordereddict
* format
* fix the fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* feat: support RS-LoRA in the ModelConfig
* build: bump minimum peft version to support rslora
* test: add test for get_peft_config
* test: make test python 3.8 friendly
* rm unused marker
* minor changes
* simplify, clarify doc
* update deps (peft in test)
* re-ordering
* fix setup
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <45557362+qgallouedec@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* skip bigbird in ci
* readd big bird test
* pytest parametrize
* dont check the version
* rm model name
* re add big bird
* Merge branch 'main' into readd-bigbird-save-load-test
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
* Bug Fix while training using SFTTrainer with DataCollatorForCompletionOnlyLM
Added ```dataset_text_field``` in the SFTConfig while training
* Update docs/source/sft_trainer.mdx
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* online dpo cleanups
* remove unused self.policy
* add OnlineDPOTrainer and config to __init__.py
* import from trainer
* online dpo test
* rename policy to model and ref_policy to ref_model
* renamed internally
* formatting
* Fix `torch_dtype` handling through CLI
The `torch_dtype` is not properly handled when provided via the TRL CLI
since it's provided initially as a string, but is then casted to
`torch.dtype` before providing it to the `{DPO,SFT}Trainer`, which means
that those trainers should handle the scenario where `torch_dtype` is a
`torch.dtype` too.
* Add `torch_dtype` tests in `test_{dpo,sft}_trainer.py`
* Forward contribution credits
* Run `make precommit`
---------
Co-authored-by: Tash Srivastava <yash-srivastava19@users.noreply.github.com>
* Preserve token fields when converting TrainingArguments to SFTConfig
TrainingArguments.to_dict() redacts token fields, so we have to
individually copy them over when converting to SFTConfig to avoid
breaking push_to_hub functionality.
Also adds a test.
* run precommit
* one-line args_as_dict definition per suggestion from kashif
* generalize token copying to match TrainingArguments behavior
* unwrap |= on dict, to support python 3.8
* use .update instead of |= or for-loop
* Remove extra whitespaces
* idefics
* vdpo
* sft idefics
* pad with test
* use prompt instead of tokenizer
* rm name main
* support vlm in tokenize row
* temp fix for regex in lora_target_module
* format
* vdpo
* tmp float16 hard code
* concatenated_forward support for vision
* style and new command line
* all-linear
* format
* delete old examples
* get image
* upcast
* new test
* modified test
* new strat for tokenizer
* rm token transfer
* integrate vision in dpo example
* format
* add FDivergenceType back
* precommit
* pillow test dep
* optional prompt
* `evaluation_strategy` to `eval_strategy`
* revert vsft change (oos)
* update test
* test
* comment and support more in process
* update process
* update doc for vdpo
* caution about limited support
* Update docs/source/dpo_trainer.mdx
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* revert DPO example changes
* cleaner way to check if a model is vision
* comment
* update vdpo example
* rename
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gallouédec <quentin.gallouedec@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* add a test case for num_train_epochs
* fix ci
* quick change
* disable push to hub
* debug windows ci
* try another fix
* skip subprocess tests on windows
Current handling of `response_masks` inside `batch_forward_pass`
function does not take padding into consideration which results with
shape unmatch during masking. Since response mask is a mask tensor of
response tokens, response tokens should not be concatenated with a
`torch.zeros(query_length)` and masking operation should be done without
slicing.
Remove the concatenation of the response mask, remove the slicing from
the response mask since response mask already has the length of `end -
start + 1`, which is equal to length of `masks[j, start:end]`.
* Step 1: update ppo_trainer and hello_world example
* Step 2: Refine comments and add parameter type
* Step 2: Add missing parameter comments
* Step 1: Organize ptx loss into a function and add ptx_loss to train_stats
* Step 1 updates: add comment to ptx_loss function, fix a bug and add warning message
* Step 2: 1) Add ppo_ptx trainig example as ppo; 2) separate pretrain data fetch and iterate
* Step 2: Remove loss from columns_to_log in ppo_ptx example
* Remove data set revision in load imbd dataset
* Run pre-commit and fix format issues
* Initial draft of f-divergence fn
* Update f-divergence to avoid overflow
* fix test errors and comments
* Add Unit tests for dpo loss with alpha and js div f
* Adjust format
* Fix test error
* Reverse this update
* Add test cases
* Reverse un-needed updates
* Update code style
* Try to fix code fmt error
* remove extra end line
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* working trl parser with config
correctly overrides yaml config with command line arguments
adds return_remaining_strings
when return_remaining_strings is False, raises error if yaml contains
extra args that are not in the dataclasses
simpler and cleaner than previous yaml parsing and merging
addresses #1733
* lowercase trlparser
* Add test for skipping preproc if packing=True
Signed-off-by: Alex-Brooks <Alex.Brooks@ibm.com>
* Allow skipping of validation for packing=True
Signed-off-by: Alex-Brooks <Alex.Brooks@ibm.com>
* Use dummy dataset in no packing preproc test
Signed-off-by: Alex-Brooks <Alex.Brooks@ibm.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex-Brooks <Alex.Brooks@ibm.com>
* Don't override optimize_device_cache when optimize_cuda_cache is not provided
Raise an exception when both optimize_cuda_cache and optimize_device_cache are set
* Minor fix
* [ORPO] Correct label mask for pad tokens
Recent [fix](57aebe9c36) for calculating NLL loss for a whole sequence introduced a bug. When input_ids are copied to labels, pad tokens are not masked.
This PR aims to path this by masking labels based on the attention mask.
* -100 -> label_pad_token_id
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>
* fixed adding bos and eos token unconditionally
* fixed typo of tokenizer -> self.tokenizer. Also added update to ORPO
* fixed code quality, and added BOS/EOS fix to KTO
* code reformatting with pre-commit run --all-files
* bug fix: check input id length before checking for EOS/BOS
* add `Loss Functions` section in the doc.
* add bce loss with reward shift in KTOTrainer
* add underlying distribution matching
* update example to use underlying distribution matching
* add config description
* fix 'referenced before assignment' error
* add 'bco' and 'udm' test cases
* run pre-commit
* add `scikit-learn` dependency
* raise error is sklearn is not available
* call TrainingArguments().__post_init__() for proper init
* initial DPOConfig
* fix doc string
* use DPOConfig
* fix missing import
* fix DpoScriptArguments
* override args config when given in init
* use DPOConfig
* fix output dir name
* over-ride with depreicated arguments if given
* use DPOConfig in tests
* fix comment
* add custom_message
* use dataset_train_name and dataset_test_name
* beta is also in the training_args
* fix loss_type docs
* Update trl/commands/cli_utils.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/commands/cli_utils.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* Update trl/commands/cli_utils.py
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
* use DPOScriptArguments
---------
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
description:Submit a bug report to help us improve TRL
labels:["bug"]
body:
- type:markdown
attributes:
value:|
Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report! 🤗
🚩 If it is your first time submitting, be sure to check our [bug report guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#did-you-find-a-bug)
- type:textarea
id:reproduction
validations:
required:true
attributes:
label:Reproduction
description:|
Please provide a code sample that reproduces the problem you ran into. It can be a Colab link or just a code snippet.
If you have code snippets, error messages, stack traces please provide them here as well.
Important! Use code tags to correctly format your code. See https://help.github.com/en/github/writing-on-github/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks#syntax-highlighting
Do not use screenshots, as they are hard to read and (more importantly) don't allow others to copy-and-paste your code.
value:|
```python
from trl import ...
```
outputs:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "example.py", line 42, in <module>
...
```
- type:textarea
id:system-info
attributes:
label:System Info
description:|
Please provide information about your system: platform, Python version, PyTorch version, Transformers version, devices, TRL version, ...
You can get this information by running `trl env` in your terminal.
placeholder:Copy-paste the output of `trl env`
validations:
required:true
- type:checkboxes
id:terms
attributes:
label:Checklist
description:|
Before submitting, please confirm that you've completed each of the following.
If an item doesn't apply to your issue, check it anyway to show you've reviewed it.
options:
- label:"I have checked that my issue isn't already filed (see [open issues](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues?q=is%3Aissue))"
required:true
- label:"I have included my system information"
required:true
- label:"Any code provided is minimal, complete, and reproducible ([more on MREs](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks))"
required:true
- label:"Any code provided is properly formatted in code blocks, (no screenshot, [more on code blocks](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks))"
description:Submit a proposal/request for a new TRL feature
labels:["Feature request"]
body:
- type:textarea
id:feature-request
validations:
required:true
attributes:
label:Feature request
description:|
A clear and concise description of the feature proposal. Please provide a link to the paper and code in case they exist.
- type:textarea
id:motivation
validations:
required:true
attributes:
label:Motivation
description:|
Please outline the motivation for the proposal. Is your feature request related to a problem? e.g., I'm always frustrated when [...]. If this is related to another GitHub issue, please link here too.
- type:textarea
id:contribution
validations:
required:true
attributes:
label:Your contribution
description:|
Is there any way that you could help, e.g. by submitting a PR? Make sure to read the CONTRIBUTING.MD [readme](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
description:Submit a proposal/request to implement a new trainer for a post-training method
labels:["New trainer"]
body:
- type:textarea
id:description-request
validations:
required:true
attributes:
label:Method description
description:|
Put any and all important information relative to the method
- type:checkboxes
id:information-tasks
attributes:
label:Open source status
description:|
Please note that if the method implementation isn't available or model weights with training datasets aren't available, we are less likely to implement it in `trl`.
options:
- label:"The method implementation is available"
- label:"The model weights are available"
- label:"The training datasets are available"
- type:textarea
id:additional-info
attributes:
label:Provide useful links for the implementation
description:|
Please provide information regarding the implementation, the weights, and the authors.
Please mention the authors by @gh-username if you're aware of their usernames.
Congratulations! You've made it this far! You're not quite done yet though.
Once merged, your PR is going to appear in the release notes with the title you set, so make sure it's a great title that fully reflects the extent of your awesome contribution.
Then, please replace this with a description of the change and which issue is fixed (if applicable). Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies (if any) that are required for this change.
Once you're done, someone will review your PR shortly. They may suggest changes to make the code even better.
-->
<!-- Remove if not applicable -->
Fixes # (issue)
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Did you read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#create-a-pull-request),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? Please add a link
to it if that's the case.
- [ ] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
- [ ] Did you write any new necessary tests?
## Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
abstract: "With trl you can train transformer language models with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The library is built on top of the transformers library by \U0001F917 Hugging Face. Therefore, pre-trained language models can be directly loaded via transformers. At this point, most decoder and encoder-decoder architectures are supported."
Everyone is welcome to contribute, and we value everybody's contribution. Code contributions are not the only way to help the community. Answering questions, helping others, and improving the documentation are also immensely valuable.
Before you start contributing make sure you installed all the dev tools:
It also helps us if you spread the word! Reference the library in blog posts about the awesome projects it made possible, shout out on Twitter every time it has helped you, or simply ⭐️ the repository to say thank you.
However you choose to contribute, please be mindful and respect our [code of conduct](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
**This guide was heavily inspired by the awesome [scikit-learn guide to contributing](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).**
## Ways to contribute
There are several ways you can contribute to TRL:
* Fix outstanding issues with the existing code.
* Submit issues related to bugs or desired new features.
* Implement trainers for new post-training algorithms.
* Contribute to the examples or the documentation.
If you don't know where to start, there is a special [Good First Issue](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/labels/%F0%9F%91%B6%20good%20first%20issue) listing. It will give you a list of open issues that are beginner-friendly and help you start contributing to open-source. The best way to do that is to open a Pull Request and link it to the issue that you'd like to work on. We try to give priority to opened PRs as we can easily track the progress of the fix, and if the contributor does not have time anymore, someone else can take the PR over.
For something slightly more challenging, you can also take a look at the [Good Second Issue](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/labels/Good%20Second%20Issue) list. In general though, if you feel like you know what you're doing, go for it and we'll help you get there! 🚀
> All contributions are equally valuable to the community. 🥰
Before you start contributing make sure you have installed all the dev tools:
```bash
make dev
pip install -e .[dev]
```
## Did you find a bug?
## Fixing outstanding issues
* Ensure the bug was not already reported by searching on GitHub under Issues.
* If you're unable to find an open issue addressing the problem, open a new one. Be sure to include a title and clear description, as much relevant information as possible, and a code sample or an executable test case demonstrating the expected behavior that is not occurring.
* Be sure to add the complete error messages.
If you notice an issue with the existing code and have a fix in mind, feel free to [start contributing](#submitting-a-pull-request-pr) and open a Pull Request!
#### Did you write a patch that fixes a bug?
## Submitting a bug-related issue or feature request
* Open a new GitHub pull request with the patch.
* Ensure that your PR includes a test that fails without your patch, and pass with it.
* Ensure the PR description clearly describes the problem and solution. Include the relevant issue number if applicable.
Do your best to follow these guidelines when submitting a bug-related issue or a feature request. It will make it easier for us to come back to you quickly and with good feedback.
## PR submission guidelines
### Did you find a bug?
* Keep each PR focused. While it's more convenient, do not combine several unrelated fixes together. Create as many branches as needing to keep each PR focused.
* Do not mix style changes/fixes with "functional" changes. It's very difficult to review such PRs and it most likely get rejected.
* Do not add/remove vertical whitespace. Preserve the original style of the file you edit as much as you can.
* Do not turn an already submitted PR into your development playground. If after you submitted PR, you discovered that more work is needed - close the PR, do the required work and then submit a new PR. Otherwise each of your commits requires attention from maintainers of the project.
* If, however, you submitted a PR and received a request for changes, you should proceed with commits inside that PR, so that the maintainer can see the incremental fixes and won't need to review the whole PR again. In the exception case where you realize it'll take many many commits to complete the requests, then it's probably best to close the PR, do the work and then submit it again. Use common sense where you'd choose one way over another.
The TRL library is robust and reliable thanks to users who report the problems they encounter.
### Before you submit a PR
Before you report an issue, we would really appreciate it if you could **make sure the bug was not already reported** (use the search bar on GitHub under Issues). Your issue should also be related to bugs in the library itself, and not your code.
First you want to make sure that all the tests pass:
Once you've confirmed the bug hasn't already been reported, please include the following information in your issue so we can quickly resolve it:
* Your **OS type and version**, **Python**, **PyTorch**, **TRL** and **Transformers** versions.
* A short, self-contained, code snippet that allows us to reproduce the bug in less than 30s.
* The *full* traceback if an exception is raised.
* Attach any other additional information, like screenshots, you think may help.
To get the OS and software versions automatically, run the following command:
```bash
make test
trl env
```
Then before submitting your PR make sure the code quality follows the standards. You can run the following command to format:
### Do you want a new feature?
If there is a new feature you'd like to see in TRL, please open an issue and describe:
1. What is the *motivation* behind this feature? Is it related to a problem or frustration with the library? Is it a feature related to something you need for a project? Is it something you worked on and think it could benefit the community?
Whatever it is, we'd love to hear about it!
2. Describe your requested feature in as much detail as possible. The more you can tell us about it, the better we'll be able to help you.
3. Provide a *code snippet* that demonstrates the feature's usage.
4. If the feature is related to a paper, please include a link.
If your issue is well written we're already 80% of the way there by the time you create it.
## Do you want to implement a new trainer?
New post-training methods are published frequently and those that satisfy the following criteria are good candidates to be integrated into TRL:
* **Simplicity:** Does the new method achieve similar performance as prior methods, but with less complexity? A good example is Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) [[Rafailov et al, 2023]](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290), which provided a simpler and compelling alternative to RLHF methods.
* **Efficiency:** Does the new method provide a significant improvement in training efficiency? A good example is Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) [[Hong et al, 2023]](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.07691), which utilizes a similar objective as DPO but requires half the GPU VRAM.
Methods that only provide incremental improvements at the expense of added complexity or compute costs are unlikely to be included in TRL.
If you want to implement a trainer for a new post-training method, first open an issue and provide the following information:
* A short description of the method and a link to the paper.
* Link to the implementation if it is open-sourced.
* Link to model weights trained with the method if they are available.
Based on the community and maintainer feedback, the next step will be to implement the trainer and config classes. See the following examples for inspiration:
* Paired preference optimisation: [`dpo_trainer.py`](./trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py) and [`dpo_config.py`](./trl/trainer/dpo_config.py)
* RL-based optimisation: [`rloo_trainer.py](./trl/trainer/rloo_trainer.py) and [`rloo_config.py](./trl/trainer/rloo_config.py)
* Online optimisation: [`online_dpo_trainer.py`](./trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py) and [`online_dpo_config.py`](./trl/trainer/online_dpo_config.py)
## Do you want to add documentation?
We're always looking for improvements to the documentation that make it more clear and accurate. Please let us know how the documentation can be improved, such as typos, dead links, and any missing, unclear, or inaccurate content... We'll be happy to make the changes or help you contribute if you're interested!
## Submitting a pull request (PR)
Before writing code, we strongly advise you to search through the existing PRs or issues to make sure that nobody is already working on the same thing. If you are unsure, it is always a good idea to open an issue to get some feedback.
You will need basic `git` proficiency to be able to contribute to TRL. `git` is not the easiest tool to use but it has the greatest manual. Type `git --help` in a shell and enjoy. If you prefer books, [Pro Git](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2) is a very good reference.
Follow these steps to start contributing:
1. Fork the [repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl) by clicking on the 'Fork' button on the repository's page. This creates a copy of the code under your GitHub user account.
2. Clone your fork to your local disk, and add the base repository as a remote. The following command assumes you have your public SSH key uploaded to GitHub. See the following guide for more [information](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/cloning-a-repository).
3. Create a new branch to hold your development changes, and do this for every new PR you work on.
Start by synchronizing your `main` branch with the `upstream/main` branch (more details in the [GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/syncing-a-fork)):
```bash
git checkout main
git fetch upstream
git merge upstream/main
```
Once your `main` branch is synchronized, create a new branch from it:
```bash
git checkout -b a-descriptive-name-for-my-changes
```
**Do not** work on the `main` branch.
4. Set up a development environment by running the following command in a conda or a virtual environment you've created for working on this library:
```bash
pip install -e .[dev]
```
(If TRL was already installed in the virtual environment, remove it with `pip uninstall trl` before reinstalling it.)
Alternatively, if you are using [Visual Studio Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/Download), the fastest way to get set up is by using the provided Dev Container. Check [the documentation on how to get started with dev containers](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/containers).
5. Develop the features on your branch.
As you work on the features, you should make sure that the test suite passes. You should run the tests impacted by your changes like this (see below an explanation regarding the environment variable):
```bash
pytest tests/<TEST_TO_RUN>.py
```
> For the following commands leveraging the `make` utility.
You can also run the full suite with the following command.
```bash
make test
```
TRL relies on `ruff` for maintaining consistent code formatting across its source files. Before submitting any PR, you should apply automatic style corrections and run code verification checks.
We provide a `precommit` target in the `Makefile` that simplifies this process by running all required checks and optimizations on only the files modified by your PR.
To apply these checks and corrections in one step, use:
```bash
make precommit
```
This command runs the following:
* Executes `pre-commit` hooks to automatically fix style issues with `ruff` and other tools.
* Runs additional scripts such as adding copyright information.
If you prefer to apply the style corrections separately or review them individually, the `pre-commit` hook will handle the formatting for the files in question.
Once you're happy with your changes, add changed files using `git add` and make a commit with `git commit` to record your changes locally:
6. Once you are satisfied (**and the checklist below is happy too**), go to the webpage of your fork on GitHub. Click on 'Pull request' to send your changes to the project maintainers for review.
7. It's ok if maintainers ask you for changes. It happens to core contributors too! To ensure everyone can review your changes in the pull request, work on your local branch and push the updates to your fork. They will automatically appear in the pull request.
### Checklist
1. The title of your pull request should be a summary of its contribution;
2. If your pull request addresses an issue, please mention the issue number in the pull request description to make sure they are linked (and people consulting the issue know you are working on it);
3. To indicate a work in progress please prefix the title with `[WIP]`, or mark the PR as a draft PR. These are useful to avoid duplicated work, and to differentiate it from PRs ready to be merged;
4. Make sure existing tests pass;
5. Add high-coverage tests. No quality testing = no merge.
### Tests
An extensive test suite is included to test the library behavior and several examples. Library tests can be found in
the [tests folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/tests).
We use `pytest` to run the tests. From the root of the
repository here's how to run tests with `pytest` for the library:
```bash
make precommit
python -m pytest -sv ./tests
```
Make sure to install `pre-commit` before running the command:
```bash
pip install pre-commit
```
That's how `make test` is implemented (without the `pip install` line)!
## Do you want to contribute to the documentation?
You can specify a smaller set of tests to test only the feature
you're working on.
* Docs are in the `docs/` folder and can be updated there.
### Default values guidelines
1. **Use defaults when appropriate**:
Provide default values unless the parameter's value varies significantly by use case. For example, datasets or models should not have defaults, but parameters like `learning_rate` should.
2. **Prioritize proven defaults**:
Default values should align with those recommended in the original paper or method. Alternatives require strong evidence of superior performance in most cases.
3. **Ensure safety and predictability**:
Defaults must be safe, expected and reliable. Avoid settings that could lead to surprising outcomes, such as excessive memory usage or poor performance in edge cases.
4. **Balance consistency and flexibility**:
Aim for consistent defaults across similar functions or methods. However, consistency should not be preferred to point 2 or 3.
5. **Opt-in for new features**:
Do not enable new features or improvements (e.g., novel loss functions) by default. Users should explicitly opt-in to use these.
### Writing documentation
High-quality documentation is crucial for maintaining a project that is easy to use, understand, and extend. When adding new features, ensure they are thoroughly documented to maintain consistency and clarity throughout the project.
To illustrate what good documentation looks like, here’s an example of a well-documented function:
* **Line Wrapping:** Applied a consistent line wrap at column 120 to improve readability.
* **Definite Articles:** Removed definite articles where possible to streamline language. (Eg: Changed "The string to replicate" to "String to replicate")
* **Type Annotations:**
* Always include type definitions, indicating if a parameter is optional and specifying the default value.
* **String Defaults:**
* Ensured that default string values are wrapped in double quotes:
```txt
defaults to `"foo"`
```
* **Dictionary Typing:**
* Replaced generic `dict` type hints with more explicit `dict[str, Any]` to clarify expected key-value pairs.
* **Default Value Formatting:**
* Consistently surrounded default values with backticks for improved formatting:
```txt
defaults to `4`
```
* **Sub-sectioning:** When the number of arguments is large, consider breaking them into sub-sections for better readability.
include_variance (`bool`, *optional*, defaults to `False`):
Whether to include the variance of the dataset in the results.
Returns:
`dict[str, float]`:
A dictionary containing calculated statistics such as mean, median, and optionally variance.
"""
...
```
### Deprecation and backward compatibility
Our approach to deprecation and backward compatibility is flexible and based on the feature’s usage and impact. Each deprecation is carefully evaluated, aiming to balance innovation with user needs.
When a feature or component is marked for deprecation, its use will emit a warning message. This warning will include:
* **Transition Guidance**: Instructions on how to migrate to the alternative solution or replacement.
* **Removal Version**: The target version when the feature will be removed, providing users with a clear timeframe to transition.
Example:
```python
warnings.warn(
"The `Trainer.foo` method is deprecated and will be removed in version 0.14.0. "
"Please use the `Trainer.bar` class instead.",
FutureWarning,
)
```
The deprecation and removal schedule is based on each feature's usage and impact, with examples at two extremes:
* **Experimental or Low-Use Features**: For a feature that is experimental or has limited usage, backward compatibility may not be maintained between releases. Users should therefore anticipate potential breaking changes from one version to the next.
* **Widely-Used Components**: For a feature with high usage, we aim for a more gradual transition period of approximately **5 months**, generally scheduling deprecation around **5 minor releases** after the initial warning.
These examples represent the two ends of a continuum. The specific timeline for each feature will be determined individually, balancing innovation with user stability needs.
### Working with warnings
Warnings play a critical role in guiding users toward resolving potential issues, but they should be used thoughtfully to avoid unnecessary noise. Unlike logging, which provides informational context or operational details, warnings signal conditions that require attention and action. Overusing warnings can dilute their importance, leading users to ignore them entirely.
#### Definitions
* **Correct**: An operation is correct if it is valid, follows the intended approach, and aligns with the current best practices or guidelines within the codebase. This is the recommended or intended way to perform the operation.
* **Supported**: An operation is supported if it is technically valid and works within the current codebase, but it may not be the most efficient, optimal, or recommended way to perform the task. This includes deprecated features or legacy approaches that still work but may be phased out in the future.
#### Choosing the right message
* **Correct → No warning**:
If the operation is fully valid and expected, no message should be issued. The system is working as intended, so no warning is necessary.
* **Correct but deserves attention → No warning, possibly a log message**:
When an operation is correct but uncommon or requires special attention, providing an informational message can be helpful. This keeps users informed without implying any issue. If available, use the logger to output this message. Example:
```python
logger.info("This is an informational message about a rare but correct operation.")
```
* **Correct but very likely a mistake → Warning with option to disable**:
In rare cases, you may want to issue a warning for a correct operation that’s very likely a mistake. In such cases, you must provide an option to suppress the warning. This can be done with a flag in the function. Example:
```python
def my_function(foo, bar, _warn=True):
if foo == bar:
if _warn:
logger.warning("foo and bar are the same, this is likely a mistake. Ignore this warning by setting `_warn=False`.")
# Do something
```
* **Supported but not correct → Warning**:
If the operation is technically supported but is deprecated, suboptimal, or could cause future issues (e.g., conflicting arguments), a warning should be raised. This message should be actionable, meaning it must explain how to resolve the issue. Example:
```python
def my_function(foo, bar):
if foo and bar:
logger.warning("Both `foo` and `bar` were provided, but only one is allowed. Ignoring `foo`. Please pass only one of these arguments.")
# Do something
```
* **Not supported → Exception**:
If the operation is invalid or unsupported, raise an exception. This indicates that the operation cannot be performed and requires immediate attention. Example:
```python
def my_function(foo, bar):
if foo and bar:
raise ValueError("Both `foo` and `bar` were provided, but only one is allowed. Please pass only one of these arguments.")
```
By following this classification, you ensure that warnings, information, and exceptions are used appropriately, providing clear guidance to the user without cluttering the system with unnecessary messages.
python -m pytest -n auto --dist=loadfile -s -v ./tests/
pytest -n auto -m "not slow and not low_priority" -s -v --reruns 5 --reruns-delay 1 --only-rerun '(OSError|Timeout|HTTPError.*502|HTTPError.*504||not less than or equal to 0.01)'tests/
<ahref="https://huggingface.co/trl-lib"><imgalt="Hugging Face Hub"src="https://img.shields.io/badge/🤗%20Hub-trl--lib-yellow"></a>
</p>
## 🎉 What's New
## What is it?
**OpenEnv Integration:** TRL now supports **[OpenEnv](https://huggingface.co/blog/openenv)**, the open-source framework from Meta for defining, deploying, and interacting with environments in reinforcement learning and agentic workflows.
The `trl` library is a full stack tool to fine-tune and align transformer language and diffusion models using methods such as Supervised Fine-tuning step (SFT), Reward Modeling (RM) and the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) as well as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).
Explore how to seamlessly integrate TRL with OpenEnv in our [dedicated documentation](openenv).
The library is built on top of the [`transformers`](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers) library and thus allows to use any model architecture available there.
## Overview
TRL is a cutting-edge library designed for post-training foundation models using advanced techniques like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Built on top of the [🤗 Transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers) ecosystem, TRL supports a variety of model architectures and modalities, and can be scaled-up across various hardware setups.
## Highlights
- **`Efficient and scalable`**:
- [`accelerate`](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) is the backbone of `trl` which allows to scale model training from a single GPU to a large scale multi-node cluster with methods such as DDP and DeepSpeed.
- [`PEFT`](https://github.com/huggingface/peft) is fully integrated and allows to train even the largest models on modest hardware with quantisation and methods such as LoRA or QLoRA.
-[`unsloth`](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) is also integrated and allows to significantly speed up training with dedicated kernels.
-**`CLI`**: With the [CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/clis) you can fine-tune and chat with LLMs without writing any code using a single command and a flexible config system.
-**`Trainers`**: The Trainer classes are an abstraction to apply many fine-tuning methods with ease such as the [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer), [`DPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/trainer#trl.DPOTrainer), [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer), [`PPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/trainer#trl.PPOTrainer), [`CPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/trainer#trl.CPOTrainer), and [`ORPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/trainer#trl.ORPOTrainer).
- **`AutoModels`**: The [`AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/models#trl.AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead) & [`AutoModelForSeq2SeqLMWithValueHead`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/models#trl.AutoModelForSeq2SeqLMWithValueHead) classes add an additional value head to the model which allows to train them with RL algorithms such as PPO.
- **`Examples`**: Train GPT2 to generate positive movie reviews with a BERT sentiment classifier, full RLHF using adapters only, train GPT-j to be less toxic, [StackLlama example](https://huggingface.co/blog/stackllama), etc. following the [examples](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples).
- **Trainers**: Various fine-tuning methods are easily accessible via trainers like [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer), [`GRPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer), [`DPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer), [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer) and more.
- **Efficient and scalable**:
-Leverages [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) to scale from single GPU to multi-node clusters using methods like [DDP](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/ddp_tutorial.html) and [DeepSpeed](https://github.com/deepspeedai/DeepSpeed).
-Full integration with [🤗 PEFT](https://github.com/huggingface/peft) enables training on large models with modest hardware via quantization and LoRA/QLoRA.
-Integrates [🦥 Unsloth](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) for accelerating training using optimized kernels.
- **Command Line Interface (CLI)**: A simple interface lets you fine-tune with models without needing to write code.
## Installation
### Python package
Install the library with `pip`:
### Python Package
Install the library using `pip`:
```bash
pip install trl
```
### From source
If you want to use the latest features before an official release you can install from source:
If you want to use the latest features before an official release, you can install TRL from source:
If you want to use the examples you can clone the repository with the following command:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
```
## Command Line Interface (CLI)
## Quick Start
You can use TRL Command Line Interface (CLI) to quickly get started with Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and test your aligned model with the chat CLI:
Read more about CLI in the [relevant documentation section](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/main/en/clis) or use `--help` for more details.
## How to use
For more flexibility and control over the training, you can use the dedicated trainer classes to fine-tune the model in Python.
For more flexibility and control over training, TRL provides dedicated trainer classes to post-train language models or PEFT adapters on a custom dataset. Each trainer in TRL is a light wrapper around the 🤗 Transformers trainer and natively supports distributed training methods like DDP, DeepSpeed ZeRO, and FSDP.
### `SFTTrainer`
This is a basic example of how to use the `SFTTrainer` from the library. The `SFTTrainer` is a light wrapper around the `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune language models or adapters on a custom dataset.
Here is a basic example of how to use the [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer):
[`GRPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer) implements the [Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) algorithm](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300) that is more memory-efficient than PPO and was used to train [Deepseek AI's R1](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1).
# Dummy reward function: count the number of unique characters in the completions
defreward_num_unique_chars(completions,**kwargs):
return[len(set(c))forcincompletions]
trainer=GRPOTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_chars,
train_dataset=dataset,
)
trainer.train()
```
### `DPOTrainer`
[`DPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer) implements the popular [Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) that was used to post-train [Llama 3](https://huggingface.co/papers/2407.21783) and many other models. Here is a basic example of how to use the `DPOTrainer`:
This is a basic example of how to use the `RewardTrainer` from the library. The `RewardTrainer` is a wrapper around the `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune reward models or adapters on a custom preference dataset.
Here is a basic example of how to use the [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer):
This is a basic example of how to use the `PPOTrainer` from the library. Based on a query the language model creates a response which is then evaluated. The evaluation could be a human in the loop or another model's output.
You can use the TRL Command Line Interface (CLI) to quickly get started with post-training methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Direct Preference Optimization (DPO):
`DPOTrainer` is a trainer that uses [Direct Preference Optimization algorithm](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290). This is a basic example of how to use the `DPOTrainer` from the library. The `DPOTrainer` is a wrapper around the `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune reward models or adapters on a custom preference dataset.
Read more about CLI in the [relevant documentation section](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/clis) or use `--help` for more details.
## Development
If you want to contribute to `trl` or customizing it to your needs make sure to read the [contribution guide](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and make sure you make a dev install:
If you want to contribute to `trl` or customize it to your needs make sure to read the [contribution guide](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and make sure you make a dev install:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
cd trl/
make dev
pip install -e .[dev]
```
## References
## Experimental
### Proximal Policy Optimisation
The PPO implementation largely follows the structure introduced in the paper **"Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences"** by D. Ziegler et al. \[[paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf), [code](https://github.com/openai/lm-human-preferences)].
A minimal incubation area is available under `trl.experimental` for unstable / fast-evolving features. Anything there may change or be removed in any release without notice.
### Direct Preference Optimization
DPO is based on the original implementation of **"Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model"** by E. Mitchell et al. \[[paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18290.pdf), [code](https://github.com/eric-mitchell/direct-preference-optimization)]
Example:
```python
fromtrl.experimental.new_trainerimportNewTrainer
```
Read more in the [Experimental docs](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/experimental_overview).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{vonwerra2022trl,
author={Leandro von Werra and Younes Belkada and Lewis Tunstall and Edward Beeching and Tristan Thrush and Nathan Lambert and Shengyi Huang},
author={Leandro von Werra and Younes Belkada and Lewis Tunstall and Edward Beeching and Tristan Thrush and Nathan Lambert and Shengyi Huang and Kashif Rasul and Quentin Gallouédec},
title={TRL: Transformer Reinforcement Learning},
year={2020},
publisher={GitHub},
@ -230,3 +202,7 @@ DPO is based on the original implementation of **"Direct Preference Optimization
> VERSION needs to be formatted following the `v{major}.{minor}.{patch}` convention. We need to follow this convention to be able to retrieve versioned scripts.
## Major/Minor Release
### 1. Ensure your local repository is up to date with the upstream repository
```bash
git checkout main
git pull origin main
```
> [!WARNING]
> Do not merge other pull requests into `main` until the release is done. This is to ensure that the release is stable and does not include any untested changes. Announce internally (#trl-internal) to other maintainers that you are doing a release and that they must not merge PRs until the release is done.
### 2. Create a release branch from main
```bash
git checkout -b release-v{major}.{minor}
```
### 3. Change the version in the following files
-`.github/workflows/tests_latest.yml`:
```diff
- with: { ref: v{major}.{minor-1}-release }
+ with: { ref: v{major}.{minor}-release }
```
- `CITATION.cff`
```diff
- version: "{major}.{minor-1}"
+ version: "{major}.{minor}"
```
- `VERSION`
```diff
- {major}.{minor}.0.dev0
+ {major}.{minor}.0
```
### 4. Commit and push these changes
```shell
git add .github/workflows/tests_latest.yml CITATION.cff VERSION
git commit -m 'Release: {major}.{minor}'
git push origin release-v{major}.{minor}
```
### 5. Create a pull request
from `release-v{major}.{minor}` to `main`, named `Release: v{major}.{minor}`, wait for tests to pass, and request a review.
### 6. Once the pull request is approved, merge it into `main`
It will automatically publish the new version of the package on PyPI.
### 7. Add a tag in git to mark the release
```shell
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git tag -a v{major}.{minor}.0 -m 'Adds tag v{major}.{minor}.0 for PyPI'
git push origin v{major}.{minor}.0
```
### 8. Create a branch `v{major}.{minor}-release` for future patch releases
```shell
git checkout -b v{major}.{minor}-release
git push origin v{major}.{minor}-release
```
This ensures that future patch releases (`v{major}.{minor}.1`, `v{major}.{minor}.2`, etc.) can be made separately from `main`.
### 9. Create a GitHub Release
1. Go to the repo’s [releases section](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases) on GitHub.
2. Click **Draft a new release**.
3. Select the `v{major}.{minor}.0` tag you just created in step 7.
4. Add a title (`v{major}.{minor}.0`) and a short description of what’s new.
5. Click **Publish Release**.
### 10. Bump to dev version
1. Create a branch `bump-dev-version-{major}.{minor+1}` from `main` and checkout to it.
TRL supports the Binary Classifier Optimization (BCO).
The [BCO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.04656) authors train a binary classifier whose logit serves as a reward so that the classifier maps {prompt, chosen completion} pairs to 1 and {prompt, rejected completion} pairs to 0.
For a full example have a look at [`examples/scripts/bco.py`].
## Expected dataset type
The [`experimental.bco.BCOTrainer`] requires an [unpaired preference dataset](dataset_formats#unpaired-preference).
The [`experimental.bco.BCOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
## Expected model format
The BCO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
## Using the `BCOTrainer`
For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/bco.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `BCOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train and a reference `ref_model` which we will use to calculate the implicit rewards of the preferred and rejected response.
The `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above. Note that the `model` and `ref_model` need to have the same architecture (ie decoder only or encoder-decoder).
```python
training_args=BCOConfig(
beta=0.1,
)
bco_trainer=BCOTrainer(
model,
model_ref,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
processing_class=tokenizer,
)
```
After this one can then call:
```python
bco_trainer.train()
```
## Underlying Distribution matching (UDM)
In practical scenarios, the thumbs-up and thumbs-down datasets are likely to have divergent underlying distributions of prompts.
Consider an LLM deployed for user feedback: if the model excels in writing tasks but underperforms in coding, the thumbs-up dataset will be dominated by writing-related prompts, while the thumbs-down dataset will contain mostly coding-related prompts.
If the prompts in your desired and undesired datasets differ a lot, it is useful to enable UDM.
Set `prompt_sample_size` to define how many prompts are selected to train the UDM classifier and start the training with the provided embedding function:
```python
training_args=BCOConfig(
beta=0.1,
prompt_sample_size=512,
)
bco_trainer=BCOTrainer(
model,
model_ref,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
processing_class=tokenizer,
embedding_func=embedding_func,
embedding_tokenizer=self.embedding_tokenizer,
)
bco_trainer.train()
```
### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.
To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. MixtralConfig).
To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: 0.001).
# Best of N sampling: Alternative ways to get better model output without RL based fine-tuning
Within the extras module is the `best-of-n` sampler class that serves as an alternative method of generating better model output.
As to how it fares against the RL based fine-tuning, please look in the `examples` directory for a comparison example
## Usage
To get started quickly, instantiate an instance of the class with a model, a length sampler, a tokenizer and a callable that serves as a proxy reward pipeline that outputs reward scores for input queries
The default output is the result of taking the top scored output for each query, but you can change it to top 2 and so on by passing the `n_candidates` argument at the time of instance initialization
There is the option of setting the generation settings (like `temperature`, `pad_token_id`) at the time of instance creation as opposed to when calling the `generate` method.
This is done by passing a `GenerationConfig` from the `transformers` library at the time of initialization
Furthermore, at the time of initialization you can set the seed to control repeatability of the generation process and the number of samples to generate for each query
TRL provides a powerful command-line interface (CLI) to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) using methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and more. The CLI abstracts away much of the boilerplate, letting you launch training jobs quickly and reproducibly.
## Commands
Currently supported commands are:
### Training Commands
-`trl dpo`: fine-tune a LLM with DPO
-`trl grpo`: fine-tune a LLM with GRPO
-`trl kto`: fine-tune a LLM with KTO
-`trl reward`: train a Reward Model
-`trl rloo`: fine-tune a LLM with RLOO
-`trl sft`: fine-tune a LLM with SFT
### Other Commands
-`trl env`: get the system information
-`trl vllm-serve`: serve a model with vLLM
## Fine-Tuning with the TRL CLI
### Basic Usage
You can launch training directly from the CLI by specifying required arguments like the model and dataset:
<hfoptionsid="command_line">
<hfoptionid="SFT">
```bash
trl sft \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO">
```bash
trl dpo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward">
```bash
trl reward \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
### Using Configuration Files
To keep your CLI commands clean and reproducible, you can define all training arguments in a YAML configuration file:
<hfoptionsid="config_file">
<hfoptionid="SFT">
```yaml
# sft_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:stanfordnlp/imdb
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO">
```yaml
# dpo_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:anthropic/hh-rlhf
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward">
```yaml
# reward_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
### Scaling Up with Accelerate
TRL CLI natively supports [🤗 Accelerate](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate), making it easy to scale training across multiple GPUs, machines, or use advanced setups like DeepSpeed — all from the same CLI.
You can pass any `accelerate launch` arguments directly to `trl`, such as `--num_processes`. For more information see [Using accelerate launch](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/en/basic_tutorials/launch#using-accelerate-launch).
<hfoptionsid="launch_args">
<hfoptionid="SFT inline">
```bash
trl sft \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb \
--num_processes 4
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="SFT w/ config file">
```yaml
# sft_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:stanfordnlp/imdb
num_processes:4
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO inline">
```bash
trl dpo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf \
--num_processes 4
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO w/ config file">
```yaml
# dpo_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:anthropic/hh-rlhf
num_processes:4
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward inline">
```bash
trl reward \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
--num_processes 4
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward w/ config file">
```yaml
# reward_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
num_processes:4
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
### Using `--accelerate_config` for Accelerate Configuration
The `--accelerate_config` flag lets you easily configure distributed training with [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate). This flag accepts either:
- the name of a predefined config profile (built into TRL), or
- a path to a custom Accelerate YAML config file.
#### Predefined Config Profiles
TRL provides several ready-to-use Accelerate configs to simplify common training setups:
| Name | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `fsdp1` | Fully Sharded Data Parallel Stage 1 |
| `fsdp2` | Fully Sharded Data Parallel Stage 2 |
| `zero1` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 1 |
| `zero2` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 2 |
| `zero3` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 3 |
| `multi_gpu` | Multi-GPU training |
| `single_gpu` | Single-GPU training |
To use one of these, just pass the name to `--accelerate_config`. TRL will automatically load the corresponding config file from `trl/accelerate_config/`.
#### Example Usage
<hfoptionsid="accelerate_config">
<hfoptionid="SFT inline">
```bash
trl sft \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb \
--accelerate_config zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="SFT w/ config file">
```yaml
# sft_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:stanfordnlp/imdb
accelerate_config:zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO inline">
```bash
trl dpo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf \
--accelerate_config zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO w/ config file">
```yaml
# dpo_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:anthropic/hh-rlhf
accelerate_config:zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward inline">
```bash
trl reward \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
--accelerate_config zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward w/ config file">
```yaml
# reward_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
dataset_name:trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
accelerate_config:zero2 # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
### Using dataset mixtures
You can use dataset mixtures to combine multiple datasets into a single training dataset. This is useful for training on diverse data sources or when you want to mix different types of data.
<hfoptionsid="dataset_mixtures">
<hfoptionid="SFT">
```yaml
# sft_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
datasets:
- path:stanfordnlp/imdb
- path:roneneldan/TinyStories
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="DPO">
```yaml
# dpo_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
datasets:
- path:BAAI/Infinity-Preference
- path:argilla/Capybara-Preferences
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="Reward">
```yaml
# reward_config.yaml
model_name_or_path:Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
datasets:
- path:trl-lib/tldr-preference
- path:trl-lib/lm-human-preferences-sentiment
```
Launch with:
```bash
trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
To see all the available keywords for defining dataset mixtures, refer to the [`scripts.utils.DatasetConfig`] and [`DatasetMixtureConfig`] classes.
## Getting the System Information
You can get the system information by running the following command:
```bash
trl env
```
This will print out the system information, including the GPU information, the CUDA version, the PyTorch version, the transformers version, the TRL version, and any optional dependencies that are installed.
```txt
Copy-paste the following information when reporting an issue:
You can use TRL to fine-tune your Language Model with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Direct Policy Optimization (DPO) or even chat with your model using the TRL CLIs.
Currently supported CLIs are:
- `trl sft`: fine-tune a LLM on a text/instruction dataset
- `trl dpo`: fine-tune a LLM with DPO on a preference dataset
- `trl chat`: quickly spin up a LLM fine-tuned for chatting
## Fine-tuning with the CLI
Before getting started, pick up a Language Model from Hugging Face Hub. Supported models can be found with the filter "text-generation" within models. Also make sure to pick up a relevant dataset for your task.
Before using the `sft` or `dpo` commands make sure to run:
```bash
accelerate config
```
and pick up the right configuration for your training setup (single / multi-GPU, DeepSpeed, etc.). Make sure to complete all steps of `accelerate config` before running any CLI command.
We also recommend you passing a YAML config file to configure your training protocol. Below is a simple example of a YAML file that you can use for training your models with `trl sft` command.
```yaml
model_name_or_path:
HuggingFaceM4/tiny-random-LlamaForCausalLM
dataset_name:
imdb
dataset_text_field:
text
report_to:
none
learning_rate:
0.0001
lr_scheduler_type:
cosine
```
Save that config in a `.yaml` and get directly started ! Note you can overwrite the arguments from the config file by explicitly passing them to the CLI, e.g.:
> To use the chat CLI with the developer installation, you must run `make dev`
>
Note that the chat interface relies on the tokenizer's [chat template](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/chat_templating) to format the inputs for the model. Make sure your tokenizer has a chat template defined.
Besides talking to the model there are a few commands you can use:
- **clear**: clears the current conversation and start a new one
- **example {NAME}**: load example named `{NAME}` from the config and use it as the user input
- **set {SETTING_NAME}={SETTING_VALUE};**: change the system prompt or generation settings (multiple settings are separated by a ';').
- **reset**: same as clear but also resets the generation configs to defaults if they have been changed by **set**
- **save {SAVE_NAME} (optional)**: save the current chat and settings to file by default to `./chat_history/{MODEL_NAME}/chat_{DATETIME}.yaml` or `{SAVE_NAME}` if provided
- **exit**: closes the interface
The default examples are defined in `examples/scripts/config/default_chat_config.yaml` but you can pass your own with `--config CONFIG_FILE` where you can also specify the default generation parameters.
Community tutorials are made by active members of the Hugging Face community who want to share their knowledge and expertise with others. They are a great way to learn about the library and its features, and to get started with core classes and modalities.
| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Efficient Online Training with GRPO and vLLM in TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/grpo_vllm_online_training) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/grpo_vllm_online_training.ipynb) |
| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Post training an LLM for reasoning with GRPO in TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_llm_grpo_trl) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_llm_grpo_trl.ipynb) |
| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | RL on LLaMA 3.1-8B with GRPO and Unsloth optimizations | [Andrea Manzoni](https://huggingface.co/AManzoni) | [Link](https://colab.research.google.com/github/amanzoni1/fine_tuning/blob/main/RL_LLama3_1_8B_GRPO.ipynb) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/amanzoni1/fine_tuning/blob/main/RL_LLama3_1_8B_GRPO.ipynb) |
| Instruction tuning | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Google Gemma LLMs using ChatML format with QLoRA | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-google-gemma) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/gemma-lora-example.ipynb) |
| Structured Generation | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Llama-2-7B to generate Persian product catalogs in JSON using QLoRA and PEFT | [Mohammadreza Esmaeilian](https://huggingface.co/Mohammadreza) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/en/fine_tuning_llm_to_generate_persian_product_catalogs_in_json_format) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_llm_to_generate_persian_product_catalogs_in_json_format.ipynb) |
| Preference Optimization | [`DPOTrainer`] | Align Mistral-7b using Direct Preference Optimization for human preference alignment | [Maxime Labonne](https://huggingface.co/mlabonne) | [Link](https://mlabonne.github.io/blog/posts/Fine_tune_Mistral_7b_with_DPO.html) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/mlabonne/llm-course/blob/main/Fine_tune_a_Mistral_7b_model_with_DPO.ipynb) |
| Preference Optimization | [`ORPOTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Llama 3 with ORPO combining instruction tuning and preference alignment | [Maxime Labonne](https://huggingface.co/mlabonne) | [Link](https://mlabonne.github.io/blog/posts/2024-04-19_Fine_tune_Llama_3_with_ORPO.html) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1eHNWg9gnaXErdAa8_mcvjMupbSS6rDvi) |
| Instruction tuning | [`SFTTrainer`] | How to fine-tune open LLMs in 2025 with Hugging Face | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-llms-in-2025) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/fine-tune-llms-in-2025.ipynb) |
### Videos
| Task | Title | Author | Video |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Instruction tuning | Fine-tuning open AI models using Hugging Face TRL | [Wietse Venema](https://huggingface.co/wietsevenema) | [<img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/cnGyyM0vOes/0.jpg">](https://youtu.be/cnGyyM0vOes) |
| Instruction tuning | How to fine-tune a smol-LM with Hugging Face, TRL, and the smoltalk Dataset | [Mayurji](https://huggingface.co/iammayur) | [<img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/jKdXv3BiLu0/0.jpg">](https://youtu.be/jKdXv3BiLu0) |
<details>
<summary>⚠️ Deprecated features notice for "How to fine-tune a smol-LM with Hugging Face, TRL, and the smoltalk Dataset" (click to expand)</summary>
> [!WARNING]
> The tutorial uses two deprecated features:
>
> - `SFTTrainer(..., tokenizer=tokenizer)`: Use `SFTTrainer(..., processing_class=tokenizer)` instead, or simply omit it (it will be inferred from the model).
> - `setup_chat_format(model, tokenizer)`: Use `SFTConfig(..., chat_template_path="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B")`, where `chat_template_path` specifies the model whose chat template you want to copy.
| Visual QA | [`DPOTrainer`] | Fine-tuning SmolVLM using direct preference optimization (DPO) with TRL on a consumer GPU | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_dpo_smolvlm_instruct) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_dpo_smolvlm_instruct.ipynb) |
| Object Detection Grounding | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine tuning a VLM for Object Detection Grounding using TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_object_detection_grounding) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_object_detection_grounding.ipynb) |
| Visual QA | [`DPOTrainer`] | Fine-Tuning a Vision Language Model with TRL using MPO | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_mpo) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_mpo.ipynb) |
| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Post training a VLM for reasoning with GRPO using TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_grpo_trl) | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_grpo_trl.ipynb) |
## Contributing
If you have a tutorial that you would like to add to this list, please open a PR to add it. We will review it and merge it if it is relevant to the community.
Contrastive Preference Optimization (CPO) as introduced in the paper [Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation](https://huggingface.co/papers/2401.08417) by [Haoran Xu](https://huggingface.co/haoranxu), [Amr Sharaf](https://huggingface.co/amrsharaf), [Yunmo Chen](https://huggingface.co/yunmochen), Weiting Tan, Lingfeng Shen, Benjamin Van Durme, [Kenton Murray](https://huggingface.co/Kenton), and [Young Jin Kim](https://huggingface.co/ykim362). At a high level, CPO trains models to avoid generating adequate, but not perfect, translations in Machine Translation (MT) tasks. However, CPO is a general approximation of the DPO loss and can be applied to other domains, such as chat.
CPO aims to mitigate two fundamental shortcomings of SFT. First, SFT’s methodology of minimizing the discrepancy between predicted outputs and gold-standard references inherently caps model performance at the quality level of the training data. Secondly, SFT lacks a mechanism to prevent the model from rejecting mistakes in translations. The CPO objective is derived from the DPO objective.
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the CPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
CPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`CPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
## Example script
We provide an example script to train a model using the CPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/cpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/cpo.py)
To test the CPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
```bash
accelerate launch examples/scripts/cpo.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
--num_train_epochs 1\
--output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-CPO
```
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
*`rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
*`rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
*`rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
*`rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
*`nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss of the policy model for the chosen responses
## CPO variants
### Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO)
[Simple Preference Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.14734) (SimPO) by [Yu Meng](https://huggingface.co/yumeng5), [Mengzhou Xia](https://huggingface.co/mengzhouxia), and [Danqi Chen](https://huggingface.co/cdq10131) proposes a simpler and more effective preference optimization algorithm than DPO without using a reference model. The key designs in SimPO are (1) using length-normalized log likelihood as the implicit reward, and (2) incorporating a target reward margin in the Bradley-Terry ranking objective. The official code can be found at [princeton-nlp/SimPO](https://github.com/princeton-nlp/SimPO).
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a widely used offline preference optimization algorithm that reparameterizes reward functions in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to enhance simplicity and training stability. In this work, we propose SimPO, a simpler yet more effective approach. The effectiveness of SimPO is attributed to a key design: using the average log probability of a sequence as the implicit reward. This reward formulation better aligns with model generation and eliminates the need for a reference model, making it more compute and memory efficient. Additionally, we introduce a target reward margin to the Bradley-Terry objective to encourage a larger margin between the winning and losing responses, further enhancing the algorithm's performance. We compare SimPO to DPO and its latest variants across various state-of-the-art training setups, including both base and instruction-tuned models like Mistral and Llama3. We evaluated on extensive instruction-following benchmarks, including AlpacaEval 2, MT-Bench, and the recent challenging Arena-Hard benchmark. Our results demonstrate that SimPO consistently and significantly outperforms existing approaches without substantially increasing response length. Specifically, SimPO outperforms DPO by up to 6.4 points on AlpacaEval 2 and by up to 7.5 points on Arena-Hard. Our top-performing model, built on Llama3-8B-Instruct, achieves a remarkable 44.7 length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2 -- surpassing Claude 3 Opus on the leaderboard, and a 33.8 win rate on Arena-Hard -- making it the strongest 8B open-source model.
The SimPO loss is integrated in the [`CPOTrainer`], as it's an alternative loss that adds a reward margin, allows for length normalization, and does not use BC regularization. To use this loss, just turn on `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0` in the [`CPOConfig`] and set the `simpo_gamma` to a recommended value.
### CPO-SimPO
We also offer the combined use of CPO and SimPO, which enables more stable training and improved performance. Learn more details at [CPO-SimPO GitHub](https://github.com/fe1ixxu/CPO_SIMPO). To use this method, simply enable SimPO by setting `loss_type="simpo"` and a non-zero `cpo_alpha` in the [`CPOConfig`].
### AlphaPO
The [AlphaPO -- Reward shape matters for LLM alignment](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03884) (AlphaPO) method by Aman Gupta, Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, [Jiwoo Hong](https://huggingface.co/JW17), Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Jason Zhu, Natesh Pillai, and S. Sathiya Keerthi is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. AlphaPO is an alternative method that applies a transformation to the reward function shape in the context of SimPO loss. The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an α-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and overoptimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance.
To use this loss as described in the paper, we can set the `loss_type="alphapo"` which automatically sets `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0`, together with `alpha` and `simpo_gamma` to recommended values in the [`CPOConfig`]. Alternatively, you can manually set `loss_type="simpo"`, `cpo_alpha=0.0`, together with `alpha` and `simpo_gamma` to recommended values. Other variants of this method are also possible, such as setting `loss_type="ipo"` and `alpha` to any non-zero value.
## Loss functions
The CPO algorithm supports several loss functions. The loss function can be set using the `loss_type` parameter in the [`CPOConfig`]. The following loss functions are supported:
| `loss_type=` | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `"sigmoid"` (default) | Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model, and in fact, the [DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression. |
| `"hinge"` | The [RSO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425) paper. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the margin. |
| `"ipo"` | The [IPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair, and thus the smaller the `beta`, the larger this gap is. As per the paper, the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike DPO, which is summed only). |
| `"simpo"` | The [SimPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.14734) method is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. SimPO is an alternative loss that adds a reward margin, allows for length normalization, and does not use BC regularization. To use this loss, simply set `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0` in the [`CPOConfig`] and `simpo_gamma` to a recommended value. |
| `"alphapo"` | The [AlphaPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03884) method is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. This is syntactic sugar that automatically sets `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0`. AlphaPO applies a transformation to the reward function shape in the context of SimPO loss when the `alpha` parameter is non-zero. |
### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.
To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g., [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).
To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
Contrastive Preference Optimization (CPO) as introduced in the paper [Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation](https://huggingface.co/papers/2401.08417) by Haoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan, Lingfeng Shen, Benjamin Van Durme, Kenton Murray, and Young Jin Kim. At a high-level, CPO trains models to
avoid generating adequate, but not perfect translations in Machine Translation (MT) tasks. However, CPO is a general approximation to the DPO loss and can be applied to other domains like chat.
CPO aims to mitigate two fundamental shortcomings of SFT. First, SFT’s methodology of minimizing the discrepancy between predicted outputs and gold-standard references inherently caps model performance at the quality level of the training data. Secondly, SFT lacks a mechanism to prevent the model from rejecting mistakes in translations. The CPO objective is derived from the DPO objective.
## Expected dataset format
The CPO trainer expects a format identical to the DPO trainer, which should include three entries. These entries should be named as follows:
- `prompt`
- `chosen`
- `rejected`
for example:
```py
cpo_dataset_dict = {
"prompt": [
"hello",
"how are you",
"What is your name?",
"What is your name?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
],
"chosen": [
"hi nice to meet you",
"I am fine",
"My name is Mary",
"My name is Mary",
"Python",
"Python",
"Java",
],
"rejected": [
"leave me alone",
"I am not fine",
"Whats it to you?",
"I dont have a name",
"Javascript",
"C++",
"C++",
],
}
```
where the `prompt` contains the context inputs, `chosen` contains the corresponding chosen responses and `rejected` contains the corresponding negative (rejected) responses. As can be seen a prompt can have multiple responses and this is reflected in the entries being repeated in the dictionary's value arrays.
## Expected model format
The CPO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
## Using the `CPOTrainer`
For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/cpo.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `CPOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train. **Note that CPOTrainer eliminates the need to use the reference model, simplifying the optimization process.** The `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above.
```py
cpo_config = CPOConfig(
beta=0.1,
)
cpo_trainer = CPOTrainer(
model,
args=cpo_config,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
)
```
After this one can then call:
```py
cpo_trainer.train()
```
## Loss functions
Given the preference data, the `CPOTrainer` uses the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression.
The [RSO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10425) paper. The `CPOTrainer` can be switched to this loss via the `loss_type="hinge"` argument and the `beta` in this case is the reciprocal of the margin.
The [IPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the CPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss which can be used via the `loss_type="ipo"` argument to the trainer. Note that the `beta` parameter is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair and thus the smaller the `beta` the larger this gaps is. As per the paper the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike CPO which is summed only).
## Logging
While training and evaluating we record the following reward metrics:
* `rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
* `rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
* `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
* `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
* `nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss of the policy model for the chosen responses
TRL is designed with modularity in mind so that users are able to efficiently customize the training loop for their needs. Below are some examples on how you can apply and test different techniques. Note: Although these examples use the DPOTrainer, the customization applies to most (if not all) trainers.
## Use different optimizers and schedulers
By default, the `DPOTrainer` creates a `torch.optim.AdamW` optimizer. You can create and define a different optimizer and pass it to `DPOTrainer` as follows:
Since `trl` supports all keyword arguments when loading a model from `transformers` using `from_pretrained`, you can also leverage `load_in_8bit` from `transformers` for more memory efficient fine-tuning.
Read more about 8-bit model loading in `transformers` [Load in 8bit or 4bit](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/en/peft#load-in-8bit-or-4bit).
When training large models, you should better handle the accelerator cache by iteratively clearing it. To do so, simply pass `optimize_device_cache=True` to [`DPOConfig`]:
TRL is designed with modularity in mind so that users to be able to efficiently customize the training loop for their needs. Below are some examples on how you can apply and test different techniques.
## Train on multiple GPUs / nodes
The trainers in TRL use 🤗 Accelerate to enable distributed training across multiple GPUs or nodes. To do so, first create an 🤗 Accelerate config file by running
```bash
accelerate config
```
and answering the questions according to your multi-gpu / multi-node setup. You can then launch distributed training by running:
```bash
accelerate launch your_script.py
```
We also provide config files in the [examples folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) that can be used as templates. To use these templates, simply pass the path to the config file when launching a job, e.g.:
Refer to the [examples page](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples) for more details.
### Distributed training with DeepSpeed
All of the trainers in TRL can be run on multiple GPUs together with DeepSpeed ZeRO-{1,2,3} for efficient sharding of the optimizer states, gradients, and model weights. To do so, run:
Note that for ZeRO-3, a small tweak is needed to initialize your reward model on the correct device via the `zero3_init_context_manager()` context manager. In particular, this is needed to avoid DeepSpeed hanging after a fixed number of training steps. Here is a snippet of what is involved from the [`sentiment_tuning`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo.py) example:
Consult the 🤗 Accelerate [documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/usage_guides/deepspeed) for more information about the DeepSpeed plugin.
## Use different optimizers
By default, the `PPOTrainer` creates a `torch.optim.Adam` optimizer. You can create and define a different optimizer and pass it to `PPOTrainer`:
```python
import torch
from transformers import GPT2Tokenizer
from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
# 1. load a pretrained model
model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
You can use the new [LION optimizer from Google](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06675) as well, first take the source code of the optimizer definition [here](https://github.com/lucidrains/lion-pytorch/blob/main/lion_pytorch/lion_pytorch.py), and copy it so that you can import the optimizer. Make sure to initialize the optimizer by considering the trainable parameters only for a more memory efficient training:
We advise you to use the learning rate that you would use for `Adam` divided by 3 as pointed out [here](https://github.com/lucidrains/lion-pytorch#lion---pytorch). We observed an improvement when using this optimizer compared to classic Adam (check the full logs [here](https://wandb.ai/distill-bloom/trl/runs/lj4bheke?workspace=user-younesbelkada)):
Since `trl` supports all key word arguments when loading a model from `transformers` using `from_pretrained`, you can also leverage `load_in_8bit` from `transformers` for more memory efficient fine-tuning.
Read more about 8-bit model loading in `transformers` [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/perf_infer_gpu_one#bitsandbytes-integration-for-int8-mixedprecision-matrix-decomposition).
</div>
```python
# 0. imports
# pip install bitsandbytes
import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
# 1. load a pretrained model
model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m')
When training large models, you should better handle the CUDA cache by iteratively clearing it. Do do so, simply pass `optimize_cuda_cache=True` to `PPOConfig`:
```python
config = PPOConfig(..., optimize_cuda_cache=True)
```
## Use score scaling/normalization/clipping
As suggested by [Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04964), we support score (aka reward) scaling/normalization/clipping to improve training stability via `PPOConfig`:
```python
from trl import PPOConfig
ppo_config = {
use_score_scaling=True,
use_score_norm=True,
score_clip=0.5,
}
config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
```
To run `ppo.py`, you can use the following command:
This guide provides an overview of the dataset formats and types supported by each trainer in TRL.
## Overview of the dataset formats and types
- The *format* of a dataset refers to how the data is structured, typically categorized as either *standard* or *conversational*.
- The *type* is associated with the specific task the dataset is designed for, such as *prompt-only* or *preference*. Each type is characterized by its columns, which vary according to the task, as shown in the table.
<table>
<tr>
<th>Type \ Format</th>
<th>Standard</th>
<th>Conversational</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Language modeling</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"text": "The sky is blue."}</code></pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}]}</code></pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prompt-only</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": "The sky is"}</code></pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}]}</code></pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prompt-completion</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": "The sky is",
"completion": " blue."}</code></pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}],
"completion": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}]}</code></pre>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Preference</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": "The sky is",
"chosen": " blue.",
"rejected": " green."}</code></pre>
or, with implicit prompt:
<pre><code>{"chosen": "The sky is blue.",
"rejected": "The sky is green."}</code></pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}],
"chosen": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}],
"rejected": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is green."}]}</code></pre>
or, with implicit prompt:
<pre><code>{"chosen": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}],
"rejected": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is green."}]}</code></pre>
</td>
</tr>
<td>Unpaired preference</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": "The sky is",
"completion": " blue.",
"label": True}</code></pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}],
"completion": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is green."}],
"label": False}</code></pre>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<td>Stepwise supervision</td>
<td>
<pre><code>{"prompt": "Which number is larger, 9.8 or 9.11?",
"completions": ["The fractional part of 9.8 is 0.8.",
The standard dataset format typically consists of plain text strings. The columns in the dataset vary depending on the task. This is the format expected by TRL trainers. Below are examples of standard dataset formats for different tasks:
```python
# Language modeling
language_modeling_example={"text":"The sky is blue."}
Conversational datasets are used for tasks involving dialogues or chat interactions between users and assistants. Unlike standard dataset formats, these contain sequences of messages where each message has a `role` (e.g., `"user"` or `"assistant"`) and `content` (the message text).
```python
messages=[
{"role":"user","content":"Hello, how are you?"},
{"role":"assistant","content":"I'm doing great. How can I help you today?"},
{"role":"user","content":"I'd like to show off how chat templating works!"},
]
```
Just like standard datasets, the columns in conversational datasets vary depending on the task. Below are examples of conversational dataset formats for different tasks:
```python
# Prompt-completion
prompt_completion_example={"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
"completion":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}]}
# Preference
preference_example={
"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
"chosen":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
"rejected":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
}
```
#### Tool Calling
Some chat templates support *tool calling*, which allows the model to interact with external functions—referred to as **tools**—during generation. This extends the conversational capabilities of the model by enabling it to output a `"tool_calls"` field instead of a standard `"content"` message whenever it decides to invoke a tool.
After the assistant initiates a tool call, the tool executes and returns its output. The assistant can then process this output and continue the conversation accordingly.
Here’s a simple example of a tool-calling interaction:
```python
messages=[
{"role":"user","content":"Turn on the living room lights."},
{"role":"assistant","tool_calls":[
{"type":"function","function":{
"name":"control_light",
"arguments":{"room":"living room","state":"on"}
}}]
},
{"role":"tool","name":"control_light","content":"The lights in the living room are now on."},
{"role":"assistant","content":"Done!"}
]
```
When preparing datasets for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with tool calling, it is important that your dataset includes an additional column named `tools`. This column contains the list of available tools for the model, which is usually used by the chat template to construct the system prompt.
The tools must be specified in a codified JSON schema format. You can automatically generate this schema from Python function signatures using the [`~transformers.utils.get_json_schema`] utility:
```python
fromtransformers.utilsimportget_json_schema
defcontrol_light(room:str,state:str)->str:
"""
Controls the lights in a room.
Args:
room: The name of the room.
state: The desired state of the light ("on" or "off").
Returns:
str: A message indicating the new state of the lights.
"""
returnf"The lights in {room} are now {state}."
# Generate JSON schema
json_schema=get_json_schema(control_light)
```
The generated schema would look like:
```python
{
"type":"function",
"function":{
"name":"control_light",
"description":"Controls the lights in a room.",
"parameters":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"room":{"type":"string","description":"The name of the room."},
"state":{"type":"string","description":'The desired state of the light ("on" or "off").'},
},
"required":["room","state"],
},
"return":{"type":"string","description":"str: A message indicating the new state of the lights."},
},
}
```
A complete dataset entry for SFT might look like:
```python
{"messages":messages,"tools":[json_schema]}
```
For more detailed information on tool calling, refer to the [Tool Calling section in the `transformers` documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/chat_extras#tools-and-rag) and the blog post [Tool Use, Unified](https://huggingface.co/blog/unified-tool-use).
### Harmony
The [Harmony response format](https://cookbook.openai.com/articles/openai-harmony) was introduced with the [OpenAI GPT OSS models](https://huggingface.co/collections/openai/gpt-oss-68911959590a1634ba11c7a4). It extends the conversational format by adding richer structure for reasoning, function calls, and metadata about the model’s behavior. Key features include:
- **Developer role** – Provides high level instructions (similar to a system prompt) and lists available tools.
- **Channels** – Separate types of assistant output into distinct streams:
-`analysis`– for internal reasoning, from the key `"thinking"`
-`final`– for the user-facing answer, from the key `"content"`
-`commentary`– for tool calls or meta notes
- **Reasoning effort** – Signals how much thinking the model should show (e.g., `"low"`, `"medium"`, `"high"`).
- **Model identity** – Explicitly defines the assistant’s persona.
{"role":"developer","content":"Use a friendly tone."},
{"role":"user","content":"What is the meaning of life?"},
{"role":"assistant","thinking":"Deep reflection...","content":"The final answer is..."},
]
print(
tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=False,
reasoning_effort="low",
model_identity="You are HuggingGPT, a large language model trained by Hugging Face."
)
)
```
This produces:
```txt
<|start|>system<|message|>You are HuggingGPT, a large language model trained by Hugging Face.
Knowledge cutoff: 2024-06
Current date: 2025-08-03
Reasoning: low
# Valid channels: analysis, commentary, final. Channel must be included for every message.<|end|><|start|>developer<|message|># Instructions
Use a friendly tone.<|end|><|start|>user<|message|>What is the meaning of life?<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>analysis<|message|>Deep reflection...<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>The final answer is...<|return|>
```
For full details on message structure, supported fields, and advanced usage, see the [Harmony documentation](https://cookbook.openai.com/articles/openai-harmony).
### Types
#### Language modeling
A language modeling dataset consists of a column `"text"` (or `"messages"` for conversational datasets) containing a full sequence of text.
```python
# Standard format
language_modeling_example={"text":"The sky is blue."}
# Conversational format
language_modeling_example={"messages":[
{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},
{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}
]}
```
#### Prompt-only
In a prompt-only dataset, only the initial prompt (the question or partial sentence) is provided under the key `"prompt"`. The training typically involves generating completion based on this prompt, where the model learns to continue or complete the given input.
```python
# Standard format
prompt_only_example={"prompt":"The sky is"}
# Conversational format
prompt_only_example={"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}]}
```
For examples of prompt-only datasets, refer to the [Prompt-only datasets collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/prompt-only-datasets-677ea25245d20252cea00368).
> [!TIP]
> While both the prompt-only and language modeling types are similar, they differ in how the input is handled. In the prompt-only type, the prompt represents a partial input that expects the model to complete or continue, while in the language modeling type, the input is treated as a complete sentence or sequence. These two types are processed differently by TRL. Below is an example showing the difference in the output of the `apply_chat_template` function for each type:
> # Output: {'prompt': '<|user|>\nWhat color is the sky?<|end|>\n<|assistant|>\n'}
>
> # Example for language modeling type
> lm_example = {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}]}
> apply_chat_template(lm_example, tokenizer)
> # Output: {'text': '<|user|>\nWhat color is the sky?<|end|>\n<|endoftext|>'}
> ```
>
> - The prompt-only output includes a `'<|assistant|>\n'`, indicating the beginning of the assistant’s turn and expecting the model to generate a completion.
> - In contrast, the language modeling output treats the input as a complete sequence and terminates it with `'<|endoftext|>'`, signaling the end of the text and not expecting any additional content.
#### Prompt-completion
A prompt-completion dataset includes a `"prompt"` and a `"completion"`.
prompt_completion_example={"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
"completion":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}]}
```
For examples of prompt-completion datasets, refer to the [Prompt-completion datasets collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/prompt-completion-datasets-677ea2bb20bbb6bdccada216).
#### Preference
A preference dataset is used for tasks where the model is trained to choose between two or more possible completions to the same prompt. This dataset includes a `"prompt"`, a `"chosen"` completion, and a `"rejected"` completion. The model is trained to select the `"chosen"` response over the `"rejected"` response.
Some datasets may not include the `"prompt"` column, in which case the prompt is implicit and directly included in the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` completions. We recommend using explicit prompts whenever possible.
preference_example={"chosen":"The sky is blue.","rejected":"The sky is green."}
# Conversational format
## Explicit prompt (recommended)
preference_example={"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
"chosen":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
"rejected":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}]}
## Implicit prompt
preference_example={"chosen":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},
{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
"rejected":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},
{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}]}
```
For examples of preference datasets, refer to the [Preference datasets collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/preference-datasets-677e99b581018fcad9abd82c).
Some preference datasets can be found with [the tag `dpo` on Hugging Face Hub](https://huggingface.co/datasets?other=dpo). You can also explore the [librarian-bots' DPO Collections](https://huggingface.co/collections/librarian-bots/direct-preference-optimization-datasets-66964b12835f46289b6ef2fc) to identify preference datasets.
#### Unpaired preference
An unpaired preference dataset is similar to a preference dataset but instead of having `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` completions for the same prompt, it includes a single `"completion"` and a `"label"` indicating whether the completion is preferred or not.
unpaired_preference_example={"prompt":[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
"completion":[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
"label":True}
```
For examples of unpaired preference datasets, refer to the [Unpaired preference datasets collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/unpaired-preference-datasets-677ea22bf5f528c125b0bcdf).
#### Stepwise supervision
A stepwise (or process) supervision dataset is similar to an [unpaired preference](#unpaired-preference) dataset but includes multiple steps of completions, each with its own label. This structure is useful for tasks that need detailed, step-by-step labeling, such as reasoning tasks. By evaluating each step separately and providing targeted labels, this approach helps identify precisely where the reasoning is correct and where errors occur, allowing for targeted feedback on each part of the reasoning process.
```python
stepwise_example={
"prompt":"Which number is larger, 9.8 or 9.11?",
"completions":["The fractional part of 9.8 is 0.8, while the fractional part of 9.11 is 0.11.","Since 0.11 is greater than 0.8, the number 9.11 is larger than 9.8."],
"labels":[True,False]
}
```
For examples of stepwise supervision datasets, refer to the [Stepwise supervision datasets collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/stepwise-supervision-datasets-677ea27fd4c5941beed7a96e).
## Which dataset type to use?
Choosing the right dataset type depends on the task you are working on and the specific requirements of the TRL trainer you are using. Below is a brief overview of the dataset types supported by each TRL trainer.
| [`SFTTrainer`] | [Language modeling](#language-modeling) or [Prompt-completion](#prompt-completion) |
| [`XPOTrainer`] | [Prompt-only](#prompt-only) |
## Using any dataset with TRL: preprocessing and conversion
Many datasets come in formats tailored to specific tasks, which might not be directly compatible with TRL. To use such datasets with TRL, you may need to preprocess and convert them into the required format.
To make this easier, we provide a set of [example scripts](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/datasets) that cover common dataset conversions.
### Example: UltraFeedback dataset
Let’s take the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback) as an example. Here's a preview of the dataset:
As shown above, the dataset format does not match the expected structure. It’s not in a conversational format, the column names differ, and the results pertain to different models (e.g., Bard, GPT-4) and aspects (e.g., "helpfulness", "honesty").
By using the provided conversion script [`examples/datasets/ultrafeedback.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/datasets/ultrafeedback.py), you can transform this dataset into an unpaired preference type, and push it to the Hub:
By adapting the provided scripts or creating your own, you can convert any dataset into a format compatible with TRL.
## Utilities for converting dataset types
This section provides example code to help you convert between different dataset types. While some conversions can be performed after applying the chat template (i.e., in the standard format), we recommend performing the conversion before applying the chat template to ensure it works consistently.
For simplicity, some of the examples below do not follow this recommendation and use the standard format. However, the conversions can be applied directly to the conversational format without modification.
| From \ To | Language modeling | Prompt-completion | Prompt-only | Preference with implicit prompt | Preference | Unpaired preference | Stepwise supervision |
To convert a prompt-completion dataset into a prompt-only dataset, remove the completion.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"prompt":["The sky is","The sun is"],
"completion":[" blue."," in the sky."],
})
dataset=dataset.remove_columns("completion")
```
```python
>>>dataset[0]
{'prompt':'The sky is'}
```
### From preference with implicit prompt to language modeling dataset
To convert a preference with implicit prompt dataset into a language modeling dataset, remove the rejected, and rename the column `"chosen"` to `"text"`.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"chosen":["The sky is blue.","The sun is in the sky."],
"rejected":["The sky is green.","The sun is in the sea."],
### From preference with implicit prompt to prompt-completion dataset
To convert a preference dataset with implicit prompt into a prompt-completion dataset, extract the prompt with [`extract_prompt`], remove the rejected, and rename the column `"chosen"` to `"completion"`.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
fromtrlimportextract_prompt
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"chosen":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sky."}],
],
"rejected":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sea."}],
{'prompt':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'}],'completion':[{'role':'assistant','content':'It is blue.'}]}
```
### From preference with implicit prompt to prompt-only dataset
To convert a preference dataset with implicit prompt into a prompt-only dataset, extract the prompt with [`extract_prompt`], and remove the rejected and the chosen.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
fromtrlimportextract_prompt
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"chosen":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sky."}],
],
"rejected":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sea."}],
{'prompt':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'}]}
```
### From implicit to explicit prompt preference dataset
To convert a preference dataset with implicit prompt into a preference dataset with explicit prompt, extract the prompt with [`extract_prompt`].
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
fromtrlimportextract_prompt
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"chosen":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sky."}],
],
"rejected":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sea."}],
],
})
dataset=dataset.map(extract_prompt)
```
```python
>>>dataset[0]
{'prompt':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'}],
'chosen':[{'role':'assistant','content':'It is blue.'}],
'rejected':[{'role':'assistant','content':'It is green.'}]}
```
### From preference with implicit prompt to unpaired preference dataset
To convert a preference dataset with implicit prompt into an unpaired preference dataset, extract the prompt with [`extract_prompt`], and unpair the dataset with [`unpair_preference_dataset`].
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sky."}],
],
"rejected":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sea."}],
],
})
dataset=dataset.map(extract_prompt)
dataset=unpair_preference_dataset(dataset)
```
```python
>>>dataset[0]
{'prompt':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'}],
'completion':[{'role':'assistant','content':'It is blue.'}],
'label':True}
```
> [!WARNING]
> Keep in mind that the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` completions in a preference dataset can be both good or bad.
> Before applying [`unpair_preference_dataset`], please ensure that all `"chosen"` completions can be labeled as good and all `"rejected"` completions as bad.
> This can be ensured by checking absolute rating of each completion, e.g. from a reward model.
### From preference to language modeling dataset
To convert a preference dataset into a language modeling dataset, remove the rejected, concatenate the prompt and the chosen into the `"text"` column.
### From explicit to implicit prompt preference dataset
To convert a preference dataset with explicit prompt into a preference dataset with implicit prompt, concatenate the prompt to both chosen and rejected, and remove the prompt.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"prompt":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
{'chosen':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'},{'role':'assistant','content':'It is blue.'}],
'rejected':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'},{'role':'assistant','content':'It is green.'}]}
```
### From preference to unpaired preference dataset
To convert dataset into an unpaired preference dataset, unpair the dataset with [`unpair_preference_dataset`].
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
fromtrlimportunpair_preference_dataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"prompt":[
[{"role":"user","content":"What color is the sky?"}],
[{"role":"user","content":"Where is the sun?"}],
],
"chosen":[
[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is blue."}],
[{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sky."}],
],
"rejected":[
[{"role":"assistant","content":"It is green."}],
[{"role":"assistant","content":"In the sea."}],
],
})
dataset=unpair_preference_dataset(dataset)
```
```python
>>>dataset[0]
{'prompt':[{'role':'user','content':'What color is the sky?'}],
'completion':[{'role':'assistant','content':'It is blue.'}],
'label':True}
```
> [!WARNING]
> Keep in mind that the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` completions in a preference dataset can be both good or bad.
> Before applying [`unpair_preference_dataset`], please ensure that all `"chosen"` completions can be labeled as good and all `"rejected"` completions as bad.
> This can be ensured by checking absolute rating of each completion, e.g. from a reward model.
### From unpaired preference to language modeling dataset
To convert an unpaired preference dataset into a language modeling dataset, concatenate prompts with good completions into the `"text"` column, and remove the prompt, completion and label columns.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"prompt":["The sky is","The sun is","The sky is","The sun is"],
"completion":[" blue."," in the sky."," green."," in the sea."],
### From stepwise supervision to unpaired preference dataset
To convert a stepwise supervision dataset into an unpaired preference dataset, join the completions and merge the labels.
The method for merging the labels depends on the specific task. In this example, we use the logical AND operation. This means that if the step labels indicate the correctness of individual steps, the resulting label will reflect the correctness of the entire sequence.
```python
fromdatasetsimportDataset
dataset=Dataset.from_dict({
"prompt":["Blue light","Water"],
"completions":[[" scatters more in the atmosphere,"," so the sky is green."],
[" forms a less dense structure in ice,"," which causes it to expand when it freezes."]],
{'prompt':'Blue light','completion':' scatters more in the atmosphere, so the sky is green.','label':False}
```
## Vision datasets
Some trainers also support fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs) using image-text pairs. In this scenario, it's recommended to use a conversational format, as each model handles image placeholders in text differently.
A conversational vision dataset differs from a standard conversational dataset in two key ways:
1. The dataset must contain the key `images` with the image data (as lists of PIL images) or `image` with a single PIL image.
2. The `"content"` field in messages must be a list of dictionaries, where each dictionary specifies the type of data: `"image"` or `"text"`.
Example:
```python
# Textual dataset:
"content":"What color is the sky?"
# Vision dataset:
"content":[
{"type":"image"},
{"type":"text","text":"What color is the sky in the image?"}
]
```
An example of a conversational vision dataset is the [openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset). Below is an embedded view of the dataset's training data, allowing you to explore it directly:
## Getting started with Stable Diffusion finetuning with reinforcement learning
The machinery for finetuning of Stable Diffusion models with reinforcement learning makes heavy use of HuggingFace's `diffusers`
library. A reason for stating this is that getting started requires a bit of familiarity with the `diffusers` library concepts, mainly two of them - pipelines and schedulers.
Right out of the box (`diffusers` library), there isn't a `Pipeline` nor a `Scheduler` instance that is suitable for finetuning with reinforcement learning. Some adjustments need to made.
There is a pipeline interface that is provided by this library that is required to be implemented to be used with the `DDPOTrainer`, which is the main machinery for fine-tuning Stable Diffusion with reinforcement learning. **Note: Only the StableDiffusion architecture is supported at this point.**
There is a default implementation of this interface that you can use out of the box. Assuming the default implementation is sufficient and/or to get things moving, refer to the training example alongside this guide.
The point of the interface is to fuse the pipeline and the scheduler into one object which allows for minimalness in terms of having the constraints all in one place. The interface was designed in hopes of catering to pipelines and schedulers beyond the examples in this repository and elsewhere at this time of writing. Also the scheduler step is a method of this pipeline interface and this may seem redundant given that the raw scheduler is accessible via the interface but this is the only way to constrain the scheduler step output to an output type befitting of the algorithm at hand (DDPO).
For a more detailed look into the interface and the associated default implementation, go [here](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/tree/main/trl/models/modeling_sd_base.py)
Note that the default implementation has a LoRA implementation path and a non-LoRA based implementation path. The LoRA flag enabled by default and this can be turned off by passing in the flag to do so. LORA based training is faster and the LORA associated model hyperparameters responsible for model convergence aren't as finicky as non-LORA based training.
Also in addition, there is the expectation of providing a reward function and a prompt function. The reward function is used to evaluate the generated images and the prompt function is used to generate the prompts that are used to generate the images.
## Getting started with `examples/scripts/ddpo.py`
The `ddpo.py` script is a working example of using the `DDPO` trainer to finetune a Stable Diffusion model. This example explicitly configures a small subset of the overall parameters associated with the config object (`DDPOConfig`).
**Note:** one A100 GPU is recommended to get this running. Anything below a A100 will not be able to run this example script and even if it does via relatively smaller sized parameters, the results will most likely be poor.
Almost every configuration parameter has a default. There is only one commandline flag argument that is required of the user to get things up and running. The user is expected to have a [huggingface user access token](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/security-tokens) that will be used to upload the model post finetuning to HuggingFace hub. The following bash command is to be entered to get things running
```batch
python ddpo.py --hf_user_access_token <token>
```
To obtain the documentation of `stable_diffusion_tuning.py`, please run `python stable_diffusion_tuning.py --help`
The following are things to keep in mind (The code checks this for you as well) in general while configuring the trainer (beyond the use case of using the example script)
- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) should be greater than or equal to the configurable training batch size (`--ddpo_config.train_batch_size=3`)
- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) must be divisible by the configurable train batch size (`--ddpo_config.train_batch_size=3`)
- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) must be divisible by both the configurable gradient accumulation steps (`--ddpo_config.train_gradient_accumulation_steps=1`) and the configurable accelerator processes count
## Setting up the image logging hook function
Expect the function to be given a list of lists of the form
and `image`, `prompt`, `prompt_metadata`, `rewards`, `reward_metadata` are batched.
The last list in the lists of lists represents the last sample batch. You are likely to want to log this one
While you are free to log however you want the use of `wandb` or `tensorboard` is recommended.
### Key terms
- `rewards` : The rewards/score is a numerical associated with the generated image and is key to steering the RL process
- `reward_metadata` : The reward metadata is the metadata associated with the reward. Think of this as extra information payload delivered alongside the reward
- `prompt` : The prompt is the text that is used to generate the image
- `prompt_metadata` : The prompt metadata is the metadata associated with the prompt. A situation where this will not be empty is when the reward model comprises of a [`FLAVA`](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/flava) setup where questions and ground answers (linked to the generated image) are expected with the generated image (See here: https://github.com/kvablack/ddpo-pytorch/blob/main/ddpo_pytorch/rewards.py#L45)
- `image` : The image generated by the Stable Diffusion model
Example code for logging sampled images with `wandb` is given below.
> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
TRL supports training with DeepSpeed, a library that implements advanced training optimization techniques. These include optimizer state partitioning, offloading, gradient partitioning, and more.
DeepSpeed integrates the [Zero Redundancy Optimizer (ZeRO)](https://huggingface.co/papers/1910.02054), which allows to scale the model size proportional to the number of devices with sustained high efficiency.
We provide ready-to-use DeepSpeed configuration files in the [`examples/accelerate_configs`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) directory. For example, to run training with ZeRO Stage 2, use the following command:
Consult the 🤗 Accelerate [documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/usage_guides/deepspeed) for more information about the DeepSpeed plugin.
Language models (LMs) are known to sometimes generate toxic outputs. In this example, we will show how to "detoxify" a LM by feeding it toxic prompts and then using [Transformer Reinforcement Learning (TRL)](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to "detoxify" it.
Read this section to follow our investigation on how we can reduce toxicity in a wide range of LMs, from 125m parameters to 6B parameters!
Here's an overview of the notebooks and scripts in the [TRL toxicity repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/toxicity/scripts) as well as the link for the interactive demo:
| File | Description | Colab link |
|---|---| --- |
| [`gpt-j-6b-toxicity.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/gpt-j-6b-toxicity.py) | Detoxify `GPT-J-6B` using PPO | x |
| [`evaluate-toxicity.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/evaluate-toxicity.py) | Evaluate de-toxified models using `evaluate` | x |
| [Interactive Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/detoxified-lms)| An interactive Space that you can use to compare the original model with its detoxified version!| x |
## Context
Language models are trained on large volumes of text from the internet which also includes a lot of toxic content. Naturally, language models pick up the toxic patterns during training. Especially when prompted with already toxic texts the models are likely to continue the generations in a toxic way. The goal here is to "force" the model to be less toxic by feeding it toxic prompts and then using PPO to "detoxify" it.
### Computing toxicity scores
In order to optimize a model with PPO we need to define a reward. For this use-case we want a negative reward whenever the model generates something toxic and a positive comment when it is not toxic.
Therefore, we used [`facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target`](https://huggingface.co/facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target), which is a RoBERTa model fine-tuned to classify between "neutral" and "toxic" text as our toxic prompts classifier.
One could have also used different techniques to evaluate the toxicity of a model, or combined different toxicity classifiers, but for simplicity we have chosen to use this one.
### Selection of models
We selected the following models for our experiments to show that TRL can be easily scaled to 10B parameters models:
* [`EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M`](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M) (125 million parameters)
For the selection of the smallest model, we have chosen `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M` because it has shown to be a model that was the "most toxic" compared to other models. We have ran toxicity evaluation using `facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target` model on 4 different architectures on a subset of `allenai/real-toxicity-prompts` dataset. Note that we have computed the toxicity score on the generated text only (thus ignoring the prompt).
| Model | Mean toxicity score |
|---|---|
| `gpt2` | 0.01602 |
| `facebook/opt-350m` | 0.01628 |
| `bigscience/bloom-560m` | 0.00767 |
| `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M` | **0.02016** |
## Designing the problem
When doing PPO, it is very important to design the problem efficiently so that the model can learn to solve it. Let's cover the topics that were important for the model to converge.
### Pre-processing the dataset
The dataset consist of prompts and their continuations, and each of them has an associated `toxicity` score.
A `prompt` example:
```
{ "text": "Bronx officer Luis Rios alleged on-the-job tall tales were compounded by his lying about them in court, and", "profanity": 0.08360514, "sexually_explicit": 0.118823394, "identity_attack": 0.09608547, "flirtation": 0.23102224, "threat": 0.13215046, "insult": 0.10130461, "severe_toxicity": 0.04068885, "toxicity": 0.16534281 }
```
And its `continuation` value:
```
{ "text": " cost federal prosecutors all the drug evidence that the cop collected against an armed suspect — 16 baggies of cocaine during a strip search.", "severe_toxicity": 0.067997746, "toxicity": 0.1694093, "profanity": 0.11931301, "sexually_explicit": 0.12521537, "identity_attack": 0.09268324, "flirtation": 0.13452998, "threat": 0.31312028, "insult": 0.10761123 }
```
We want to increase the chance for the model to generate toxic prompts so we get more learning signal. For this reason pre-process the dataset to consider only the prompt that has a toxicity score that is greater than a threshold. We can do this in a few lines of code:
The reward function is one of the most important part of training a model with reinforcement learning. It is the function that will tell the model if it is doing well or not.
We tried various combinations, considering the softmax of the label "neutral", the log of the toxicity score and the raw logits of the label "neutral". We have found out that the convergence was much more smoother with the raw logits of the label "neutral".
We have found out that training a model with small or long context (from 5 to 8 tokens for the small context and from 15 to 20 tokens for the long context) does not have any impact on the convergence of the model, however, when training the model with longer prompts, the model will tend to generate more toxic prompts.
As a compromise between the two we took for a context window of 10 to 15 tokens for the training.
Our goal is to train models up to 6B parameters, which is about 24GB in float32! Here two tricks we use to be able to train a 6B model on a single 40GB-RAM GPU:
- Use `bfloat16` precision: Simply load your model in `bfloat16` when calling `from_pretrained` and you can reduce the size of the model by 2:
```python
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16)
```
and the optimizer will take care of computing the gradients in `bfloat16` precision. Note that this is a pure `bfloat16` training which is different from the mixed precision training. If one wants to train a model in mixed-precision, they should not load the model with `torch_dtype` and specify the mixed precision argument when calling `accelerate config`.
- Use shared layers: Since PPO algorithm requires to have both the active and reference model to be on the same device, we have decided to use shared layers to reduce the memory footprint of the model. This can be achieved by just speifying `num_shared_layers` argument when creating a `PPOTrainer`:
In the example above this means that the model have the 4 first layers frozen (i.e. since these layers are shared between the active model and the reference model).
- One could have also applied gradient checkpointing to reduce the memory footprint of the model by calling `model.pretrained_model.enable_gradient_checkpointing()` (although this has the downside of training being ~20% slower).
## Training the model!
We have decided to keep 3 models in total that correspond to our best models:
We have used different learning rates for each model, and have found out that the largest models were quite hard to train and can easily lead to collapse mode if the learning rate is not chosen correctly (i.e. if the learning rate is too high):
As you can see the model converges nicely, but obviously we don't observe a very large improvement from the first step, as the original model is not trained to generate toxic contents.
Also we have observed that training with larger `mini_batch_size` leads to smoother convergence and better results on the test set:
We tested our models on a new dataset, the [`OxAISH-AL-LLM/wiki_toxic`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/OxAISH-AL-LLM/wiki_toxic) dataset. We feed each model with a toxic prompt from it (a sample with the label "toxic"), and generate 30 new tokens as it is done on the training loop and measure the toxicity score using `evaluate`'s [`toxicity` metric](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/toxicity).
We report the toxicity score of 400 sampled examples, compute its mean and standard deviation and report the results in the table below:
| Model | Mean toxicity score | Std toxicity score |
The evaluation script can be found [here](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/evaluate-toxicity.py).
### Discussions
The results are quite promising, as we can see that the models are able to reduce the toxicity score of the generated text by an interesting margin. The gap is clear for `gpt-neo-2B` model but we less so for the `gpt-j-6B` model. There are several things we could try to improve the results on the largest model starting with training with larger `mini_batch_size` and probably allowing to back-propagate through more layers (i.e. use less shared layers).
To sum up, in addition to human feedback this could be a useful additional signal when training large language models to ensure there outputs are less toxic as well as useful.
### Limitations
We are also aware of consistent bias issues reported with toxicity classifiers, and of work evaluating the negative impact of toxicity reduction on the diversity of outcomes. We recommend that future work also compare the outputs of the detoxified models in terms of fairness and diversity before putting them to use.
## What is next?
You can download the model and use it out of the box with `transformers`, or play with the Spaces that compares the output of the models before and after detoxification [here](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/detoxified-lms).
> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
## Multi-GPU Training with TRL
The trainers in TRL use [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) to enable distributed training across multiple GPUs or nodes. To do so, first create an [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) config file by running
```bash
accelerate config
```
and answering the questions according to your multi-GPU / multi-node setup. You can then launch distributed training by running:
```bash
accelerate launch train.py
```
We also provide config files in the [examples folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) that can be used as templates. To use these templates, simply pass the path to the config file when launching a job, e.g.:
To maintain a consistent batch size when scaling to multiple GPUs, make sure to update `per_device_train_batch_size` and `gradient_accumulation_steps` accordingly.
Example, these configurations are equivalent, and should yield the same results:
| Number of GPUs | Per device batch size | Gradient accumulation steps | Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 32 | 1 | Possibly high memory usage, but faster training |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | Multi-GPU to get the best of both worlds |
> [!TIP]
> Having one model per GPU can lead to high memory usage, which may not be feasible for large models or low-memory GPUs. In such cases, you can leverage [DeepSpeed](https://github.com/deepspeedai/DeepSpeed), which provides optimizations like model sharding, Zero Redundancy Optimizer, mixed precision training, and offloading to CPU or NVMe. Check out our [DeepSpeed Integration](deepspeed_integration) guide for more details.
## Context Parallelism
Context Parallelism (CP) is a parallelization technique that enables training with longer sequences by splitting the sequence dimension across multiple GPUs. Each GPU processes a portion of the sequence, allowing you to train with sequences longer than what would fit on a single GPU's memory.
For more details on CP, see the [Ultrascale Playbook - Context Parallelism](https://huggingface.co/spaces/nanotron/ultrascale-playbook?section=context_parallelism).
CP is particularly useful when:
- You want to train with very long sequences (>32k tokens)
- Single GPU memory is insufficient for your desired sequence length
- You need to maintain sequence coherence across the full context
### Requirements and Limitations
CP has specific requirements:
1.**Accelerate 1.10 or higher** is required
2.**FSDP2 (PyTorch FSDP v2)** is required as the distributed training backend
3.**SDPA attention** - Flash Attention is currently not supported with CP
4.**Sequence length divisibility** - sequences must be divisible by `cp_size * 2`. This is now automatically handled using the `pad_to_multiple_of` parameter in the data collator, which works seamlessly with both standard and padding-free modes.
### Configuration
To enable CP, you need to configure both Accelerate and your training arguments:
#### Accelerate Configuration
Use one of the provided accelerate config files (e.g. [`context_parallel_2gpu.yaml`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/accelerate_configs/context_parallel_2gpu.yaml) for 2 GPUs):
```yaml
compute_environment:LOCAL_MACHINE
debug:false
distributed_type:FSDP
downcast_bf16:'no'
enable_cpu_affinity:false
fsdp_config:
fsdp_activation_checkpointing:true# Enable activation checkpointing for memory efficiency
pad_to_multiple_of=4,# ensures divisibility by cp_size * 2
# to get the most out of CP
max_length=16384,# long sequence length
packing=True,# use packing to reduce padding
use_liger_kernel=True,# compatible with CP
gradient_checkpointing=False,# The activation_checkpointing in FSDP config and the gradient_checkpointing in training arg can't be set to True simultaneously
per_device_train_batch_size=1,
...
)
```
Then, launch your training script with the appropriate accelerate config file:
We adjusted `num_processes` and `parallelism_config_cp_size` based on the number of GPUs for each run.
Training was performed with the [sft.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/sft.py) example script, combined with the parameters described above.
The results below summarize the **maximum trainable sequence length** and **iterations per second** for different numbers of GPUs. A value marked as `OOM` indicates that the configuration ran out of memory and could not be trained.
These results show that **Context Parallelism (CP) scales effectively with more GPUs**, enabling training on much longer sequences. With **8 GPUs**, context lengths of over **300k tokens** become feasible, unlocking training with extremely long contexts while maintaining reasonable throughput.
<divclass="flex justify-center">
<imgsrc="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/context_parallelism_max_length_plot.png"alt="CP Max content length"width="45%"/>
> Accelerate also supports **N-Dimensional Parallelism (ND-parallelism)**, which enables you to combine different parallelization strategies to efficiently distribute model training across multiple GPUs.
>
> You can learn more and explore configuration examples in the [Accelerate ND-parallelism guide](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/blob/main/examples/torch_native_parallelism/README.md#nd-parallelism).
- [Hugging Face Blog: Enabling Long-Context Training with Sequence Parallelism in Axolotl](https://huggingface.co/blog/axolotl-ai-co/long-context-with-sequence-parallelism-in-axolotl)
- [Snowflake Engineering Blog: Arctic Long Sequence Training (ALST) — Scalable and Efficient Training for Multi-Million Token Sequences (Note that they use a different strategy)](https://www.snowflake.com/en/engineering-blog/arctic-long-sequence-training-multi-million-token-ai/)
## Multi-Node Training
We're working on a guide for multi-node training. Stay tuned! 🚀
TRL supports the DPO Trainer for training language models from preference data, as described in the paper [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) by [Rafael Rafailov](https://huggingface.co/rmrafailov), Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, [Stefano Ermon](https://huggingface.co/ermonste), [Christopher D. Manning](https://huggingface.co/manning), [Chelsea Finn](https://huggingface.co/cbfinn).
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper we introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form, allowing us to solve the standard RLHF problem with only a simple classification loss. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for sampling from the LM during fine-tuning or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds PPO-based RLHF in ability to control sentiment of generations, and matches or improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.
The first step is to train an SFT model, to ensure the data we train on is in-distribution for the DPO algorithm.
Then, fine-tuning a language model via DPO consists of two steps and is easier than [PPO](ppo_trainer):
1.**Data collection**: Gather a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference) with positive and negative selected pairs of generation, given a prompt.
2.**Optimization**: Maximize the log-likelihood of the DPO loss directly.
This process is illustrated in the sketch below (from [Figure 1 of the DPO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290)):
Read more about DPO algorithm in the [original paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290).
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the DPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 3 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-DPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets for the development of machine learning models and applications. It provides a repository of over 300, 000 pre-trained models in Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets for the development of machine learning models and applications. It provides a repository of over 300, 000 pre-trained models in a variety of languages, enabling users to explore and utilize the latest techniques and technologies in the field of machine learning.
</code></pre>
## Expected dataset type
DPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`DPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
Although the [`DPOTrainer`] supports both explicit and implicit prompts, we recommend using explicit prompts. If provided with an implicit prompt dataset, the trainer will automatically extract the prompt from the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` columns. For more information, refer to the [preference style](dataset_formats#preference) section.
### Special considerations for vision-language models
The [`DPOTrainer`] supports fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs). For these models, a vision dataset is required. To learn more about the specific format for vision datasets, refer to the [Vision dataset format](dataset_formats#vision-datasets) section.
Additionally, unlike standard text-based models where a `tokenizer` is used, for VLMs, you should replace the `tokenizer` with a `processor`.
```diff
- model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)
+ model = AutoModelForImageTextToText.from_pretrained(model_id)
For a complete example of fine-tuning a vision-language model, refer to the script in [`examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py).
## Example script
We provide an example script to train a model using the DPO method. The script is available in [`trl/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/dpo.py)
To test the DPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
```bash
accelerate launch trl/scripts/dpo.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
--num_train_epochs 1\
--output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-DPO
```
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
-`rewards/chosen`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
-`rewards/rejected`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
-`rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
-`rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
## Loss functions
The DPO algorithm supports several loss functions. The loss function can be set using the `loss_type` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`]. The following loss functions are supported:
| `loss_type=` | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `"sigmoid"` (default) | Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model and in fact the [DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression. |
| `"hinge"` | The [RSO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425) paper. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the margin. |
| `"ipo"` | The [IPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair and thus the smaller the `beta` the larger this gaps is. As per the paper the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike DPO which is summed only). |
| `"exo_pair"` | The [EXO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.00856) authors propose to minimize the reverse KL instead of the negative log-sigmoid loss of DPO which corresponds to forward KL. Setting non-zero `label_smoothing` (default `1e-3`) leads to a simplified version of EXO on pair-wise preferences (see Eqn. (16) of the [EXO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.00856)). The full version of EXO uses `K>2` completions generated by the SFT policy, which becomes an unbiased estimator of the PPO objective (up to a constant) when `K` is sufficiently large. |
| `"nca_pair"` | The [NCA](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.05369) authors shows that NCA optimizes the absolute likelihood for each response rather than the relative likelihood. |
| `"robust"` | The [Robust DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.00409) authors propose an unbiased estimate of the DPO loss that is robust to preference noise in the data. Like in cDPO, it assumes that the preference labels are noisy with some probability. In this approach, the `label_smoothing` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`] is used to model the probability of existing label noise. To apply this conservative loss, set `label_smoothing` to a value greater than 0.0 (between 0.0 and 0.5; the default is 0.0) |
| `"bco_pair"` | The [BCO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.04656) authors train a binary classifier whose logit serves as a reward so that the classifier maps {prompt, chosen completion} pairs to 1 and {prompt, rejected completion} pairs to 0. For unpaired data, we recommend the dedicated [`BCOTrainer`]. |
| `"sppo_hard"` | The [SPPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.00675) authors claim that SPPO is capable of solving the Nash equilibrium iteratively by pushing the chosen rewards to be as large as 1/2 and the rejected rewards to be as small as -1/2 and can alleviate data sparsity issues. The implementation approximates this algorithm by employing hard label probabilities, assigning 1 to the winner and 0 to the loser. |
| `"aot"` or `loss_type="aot_pair"` | The [AOT](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.05882) authors propose to use Distributional Preference Alignment Via Optimal Transport. Traditionally, the alignment algorithms use paired preferences at a sample level, which does not ensure alignment on the distributional level. AOT, on the other hand, can align LLMs on paired or unpaired preference data by making the reward distribution of the positive samples stochastically dominant in the first order on the distribution of negative samples. Specifically, `loss_type="aot"` is appropriate for paired datasets, where each prompt has both chosen and rejected responses; `loss_type="aot_pair"` is for unpaired datasets. In a nutshell, `loss_type="aot"` ensures that the log-likelihood ratio of chosen to rejected of the aligned model has higher quantiles than that ratio for the reference model. `loss_type="aot_pair"` ensures that the chosen reward is higher on all quantiles than the rejected reward. Note that in both cases quantiles are obtained via sorting. To fully leverage the advantages of the AOT algorithm, it is important to maximize the per-GPU batch size. |
| `"apo_zero"` or `loss_type="apo_down"` | The [APO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2408.06266) method introduces an "anchored" version of the alignment objective. There are two variants: `apo_zero` and `apo_down`. The `apo_zero` loss increases the likelihood of winning outputs while decreasing the likelihood of losing outputs, making it suitable when the model is less performant than the winning outputs. On the other hand, `apo_down` decreases the likelihood of both winning and losing outputs, but with a stronger emphasis on reducing the likelihood of losing outputs. This variant is more effective when the model is better than the winning outputs. |
| `"discopop"` | The [DiscoPOP](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.08414) paper uses LLMs to discover more efficient offline preference optimization losses. In the paper the proposed DiscoPOP loss (which is a log-ratio modulated loss) outperformed other optimization losses on different tasks (IMDb positive text generation, Reddit TLDR summarization, and Alpaca Eval 2.0). |
| `"sft"` | SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning) loss is the negative log likelihood loss, used to train the model to generate preferred responses. |
### Multi-loss combinations
The DPO trainer supports combining multiple loss functions with different weights, enabling more sophisticated optimization strategies. This is particularly useful for implementing algorithms like MPO (Mixed Preference Optimization). MPO is a training approach that combines multiple optimization objectives, as described in the paper [Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2411.10442).
To combine multiple losses, specify the loss types and corresponding weights as lists:
```python
# MPO: Combines DPO (sigmoid) for preference and BCO (bco_pair) for quality
training_args=DPOConfig(
loss_type=["sigmoid","bco_pair","sft"],# Loss types to combine
loss_weights=[0.8,0.2,1.0]# Corresponding weights, as used in the MPO paper
)
```
If `loss_weights` is not provided, all loss types will have equal weights (1.0 by default).
### Label smoothing
The [cDPO](https://ericmitchell.ai/cdpo.pdf) is a tweak on the DPO loss where we assume that the preference labels are noisy with some probability. In this approach, the `label_smoothing` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`] is used to model the probability of existing label noise. To apply this conservative loss, set `label_smoothing` to a value greater than 0.0 (between 0.0 and 0.5; the default is 0.0).
### Syncing the reference model
The [TR-DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.09656) paper suggests syncing the reference model weights after every `ref_model_sync_steps` steps of SGD with weight `ref_model_mixup_alpha` during DPO training. To toggle this callback use the `sync_ref_model=True` in the [`DPOConfig`].
### RPO loss
The [RPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.19733) paper implements an iterative preference tuning algorithm using a loss related to the RPO loss in this [paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.16436) that essentially consists of a weighted SFT loss on the chosen preferences together with the DPO loss. To use this loss, set the `rpo_alpha` in the [`DPOConfig`] to an appropriate value. The paper suggests setting this weight to `1.0`.
### WPO loss
The [WPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.11827) paper adapts off-policy data to resemble on-policy data more closely by reweighting preference pairs according to their probability under the current policy. To use this method, set the `use_weighting` flag to `True` in the [`DPOConfig`].
### LD-DPO loss
The [LD-DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2409.06411) paper decomposes the portion of the response that exceeds the desired length into two components — human-like preferences and verbosity preference — based on a mixing coefficient \\( \alpha \\). To use this method, set the `ld_alpha` in the [`DPOConfig`] to an appropriate value. The paper suggests setting this value between `0.0` and `1.0`.
### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.
To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).
To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
## Accelerate DPO fine-tuning using `unsloth`
You can further accelerate QLoRA / LoRA (2x faster, 60% less memory) using the [`unsloth`](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) library that is fully compatible with `SFTTrainer`. Currently `unsloth` supports only Llama (Yi, TinyLlama, Qwen, Deepseek etc) and Mistral architectures. Some benchmarks for DPO listed below:
First install `unsloth` according to the [official documentation](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth). Once installed, you can incorporate unsloth into your workflow in a very simple manner; instead of loading `AutoModelForCausalLM`, you just need to load a `FastLanguageModel` as follows:
```diff
from datasets import load_dataset
from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
- from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+ from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
- model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
The saved model is fully compatible with Hugging Face's transformers library. Learn more about unsloth in their [official repository](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth).
## Reference model considerations with PEFT
You have three main options (plus several variants) for how the reference model works when using PEFT, assuming the model that you would like to further enhance with DPO was tuned using (Q)LoRA.
1. Simply create two instances of the model, each loading your adapter - works fine but is very inefficient.
2. Merge the adapter into the base model, create another adapter on top, then leave the `ref_model` param null, in which case DPOTrainer will unload the adapter for reference inference - efficient, but has potential downsides discussed below.
3. Load the adapter twice with different names, then use `set_adapter` during training to swap between the adapter being DPO'd and the reference adapter - slightly less efficient compared to 2 (~adapter size VRAM overhead), but avoids the pitfalls.
### Downsides to merging QLoRA before DPO (approach 2)
As suggested by [Benjamin Marie](https://medium.com/@bnjmn_marie/dont-merge-your-lora-adapter-into-a-4-bit-llm-65b6da287997), the best option for merging QLoRA adapters is to first dequantize the base model, then merge the adapter. Something similar to [this script](https://github.com/jondurbin/qlora/blob/main/qmerge.py).
However, after using this approach, you will have an unquantized base model. Therefore, to use QLoRA for DPO, you will need to re-quantize the merged model or use the unquantized merge (resulting in higher memory demand).
### Using option 3 - load the adapter twice
To avoid the downsides with option 2, you can load your fine-tuned adapter into the model twice, with different names, and set the model/ref adapter names in [`DPOTrainer`].
For example:
```python
# Load the base model.
bnb_config=BitsAndBytesConfig(
load_in_4bit=True,
llm_int8_threshold=6.0,
llm_int8_has_fp16_weight=False,
bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
bnb_4bit_use_double_quant=True,
bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
)
model=AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"mistralai/mixtral-8x7b-v0.1",
load_in_4bit=True,
quantization_config=bnb_config,
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto",
)
# Load the adapter.
model=PeftModel.from_pretrained(
model,
"/path/to/peft",
is_trainable=True,
adapter_name="train",
)
# Load the adapter a second time, with a different name, which will be our reference model.
TRL supports the DPO Trainer for training language models from preference data, as described in the paper [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290) by Rafailov et al., 2023. For a full example have a look at [`examples/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo.py).
The first step as always is to train your SFT model, to ensure the data we train on is in-distribution for the DPO algorithm.
## How DPO works
Fine-tuning a language model via DPO consists of two steps and is easier than PPO:
1. **Data collection**: Gather a preference dataset with positive and negative selected pairs of generation, given a prompt.
2. **Optimization**: Maximize the log-likelihood of the DPO loss directly.
DPO-compatible datasets can be found with [the tag `dpo` on Hugging Face Hub](https://huggingface.co/datasets?other=dpo).
This process is illustrated in the sketch below (from [figure 1 of the original paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18290.pdf)):
<img width="835" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-19 at 12 39 41" src="https://github.com/huggingface/trl/assets/49240599/9150fac6-3d88-4ca2-8ec6-2a6f3473216d">
Read more about DPO algorithm in the [original paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18290.pdf).
## Expected dataset format
The DPO trainer expects a very specific format for the dataset. Since the model will be trained to directly optimize the preference of which sentence is the most relevant, given two sentences. We provide an example from the [`Anthropic/hh-rlhf`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset below:
Therefore the final dataset object should contain these 3 entries if you use the default `DPODataCollatorWithPadding` data collator. The entries should be named:
- `prompt`
- `chosen`
- `rejected`
for example:
```py
dpo_dataset_dict = {
"prompt": [
"hello",
"how are you",
"What is your name?",
"What is your name?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
],
"chosen": [
"hi nice to meet you",
"I am fine",
"My name is Mary",
"My name is Mary",
"Python",
"Python",
"Java",
],
"rejected": [
"leave me alone",
"I am not fine",
"Whats it to you?",
"I dont have a name",
"Javascript",
"C++",
"C++",
],
}
```
where the `prompt` contains the context inputs, `chosen` contains the corresponding chosen responses and `rejected` contains the corresponding negative (rejected) responses. As can be seen a prompt can have multiple responses and this is reflected in the entries being repeated in the dictionary's value arrays.
## Expected model format
The DPO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
## Using the `DPOTrainer`
For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/dpo.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `DPOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train, a reference `ref_model` which we will use to calculate the implicit rewards of the preferred and rejected response, the `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above. Note that the `model` and `ref_model` need to have the same architecture (ie decoder only or encoder-decoder).
```py
dpo_trainer = DPOTrainer(
model,
model_ref,
args=training_args,
beta=0.1,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
)
```
After this one can then call:
```py
dpo_trainer.train()
```
Note that the `beta` is the temperature parameter for the DPO loss, typically something in the range of `0.1` to `0.5`. We ignore the reference model as `beta` -> 0.
## Loss functions
Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model and in fact the DPO authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression.
The [RSO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10425) paper. The `DPOTrainer` can be switched to this loss via the `loss_type="hinge"` argument and the `beta` in this case is the reciprocal of the margin.
The [IPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss which can be used via the `loss_type="ipo"` argument to the trainer. Note that the `beta` parameter is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair and thus the smaller the `beta` the larger this gaps is. As per the paper the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike DPO which is summed only).
The [cDPO](https://ericmitchell.ai/cdpo.pdf) is a tweak on the DPO loss where we assume that the preference labels are noisy with some probability that can be passed to the `DPOTrainer` via `label_smoothing` argument (between 0 and 0.5) and then a conservative DPO loss is used. Use the `loss_type="cdpo"` argument to the trainer to use it.
The [KTO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01306) authors directly maximize the utility of LLM generations instead of the log-likelihood of preferences. To use preference data with KTO, we recommend breaking up the n preferences into 2n examples and using [`KTOTrainer`](kto_trainer) (i.e., treating the data like an unpaired feedback dataset). Although it is possible to pass in `loss_type="kto_pair"` into DPOTrainer, this is a highly simplified version of KTO that we *do not recommend* in most cases. Please use [`KTOTrainer`](kto_trainer) when possible.
## Logging
While training and evaluating we record the following reward metrics:
* `rewards/chosen`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
* `rewards/rejected`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
* `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
* `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
## Accelerate DPO fine-tuning using `unsloth`
You can further accelerate QLoRA / LoRA (2x faster, 60% less memory) using the [`unsloth`](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) library that is fully compatible with `SFTTrainer`. Currently `unsloth` supports only Llama (Yi, TinyLlama, Qwen, Deepseek etc) and Mistral architectures. Some benchmarks for DPO listed below:
First install `unsloth` according to the [official documentation](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth). Once installed, you can incorporate unsloth into your workflow in a very simple manner; instead of loading `AutoModelForCausalLM`, you just need to load a `FastLanguageModel` as follows:
```python
import torch
from transformers import TrainingArguments
from trl import DPOTrainer
from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
max_seq_length = 2048 # Supports automatic RoPE Scaling, so choose any number.
The saved model is fully compatible with Hugging Face's transformers library. Learn more about unsloth in their [official repository](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth).
## Reference model considerations with PEFT
You have three main options (plus several variants) for how the reference model works when using PEFT, assuming the model that you would like to further enhance with DPO was tuned using (Q)LoRA.
1. Simply create two instances of the model, each loading your adapter - works fine but is very inefficient.
2. Merge the adapter into the base model, create another adapter on top, then leave the `model_ref` param null, in which case DPOTrainer will unload the adapter for reference inference - efficient, but has potential downsides discussed below.
3. Load the adapter twice with different names, then use `set_adapter` during training to swap between the adapter being DPO'd and the reference adapter - slightly less efficient compared to 2 (~adapter size VRAM overhead), but avoids the pitfalls.
### Downsides to merging QLoRA before DPO (approach 2)
As suggested by [Benjamin Marie](https://medium.com/@bnjmn_marie/dont-merge-your-lora-adapter-into-a-4-bit-llm-65b6da287997), the best option for merging QLoRA adapters is to first dequantize the base model, then merge the adapter. Something similar to [this script](https://github.com/jondurbin/qlora/blob/main/qmerge.py).
However, after using this approach, you will have an unquantized base model. Therefore, to use QLoRA for DPO, you will need to re-quantize the merged model or use the unquantized merge (resulting in higher memory demand).
### Using option 3 - load the adapter twice
To avoid the downsides with option 2, you can load your fine-tuned adapter into the model twice, with different names, and set the model/ref adapter names in DPOTrainer.
For example:
```python
# Load the base model.
bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
load_in_4bit=True,
llm_int8_threshold=6.0,
llm_int8_has_fp16_weight=False,
bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
bnb_4bit_use_double_quant=True,
bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"mistralai/mixtral-8x7b-v0.1",
load_in_4bit=True,
quantization_config=bnb_config,
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto",
)
model.config.use_cache = False
# Load the adapter.
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(
model,
"/path/to/peft",
is_trainable=True,
adapter_name="train",
)
# Load the adapter a second time, with a different name, which will be our reference model.
This directory contains a collection of examples that demonstrate how to use the TRL library for various applications. We provide both **scripts** for advanced use cases and **notebooks** for an easy start and interactive experimentation.
## Introduction
The notebooks are self-contained and can run on **free Colab**, while the scripts can run on **single GPU, multi-GPU, or DeepSpeed** setups.
The examples should work in any of the following settings (with the same script):
- fp16 (mixed-precision), fp32 (normal precision), or bf16 (bfloat16 precision)
**Getting Started**
To run it in each of these various modes, first initialize the accelerate
configuration with `accelerate config`
**NOTE to train with a 4-bit or 8-bit model**, please run
Install TRL and additional dependencies as follows:
```bash
pip install --upgrade trl[quantization]
```
Check for additional optional dependencies [here](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/pyproject.toml).
## Accelerate Config
For all the examples, you'll need to generate a 🤗 Accelerate config file with:
For scripts, you will also need an 🤗 Accelerate config (recommended for multi-gpu settings):
```shell
```bash
accelerate config # will prompt you to define the training configuration
```
Then, it is encouraged to launch jobs with `accelerate launch`!
This allows you to run scripts with `accelerate launch` in single or multi-GPU settings.
## Notebooks
These notebooks are easier to run and are designed for quick experimentation with TRL. The list of notebooks can be found in the [`trl/examples/notebooks/`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/) directory.
# Maintained Examples
| Notebook | Description | Open in Colab |
|----------|-------------|---------------|
| [`sft_trl_lora_qlora.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/sft_trl_lora_qlora.ipynb) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using QLoRA on free Colab | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/sft_trl_lora_qlora.ipynb) |
| [`sft_qwen_vl.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/sft_qwen_vl.ipynb) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) Qwen3-VL with QLoRA using TRL on free Colab | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/sft_qwen_vl.ipynb) |
| [`grpo_qwen3_vl.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/grpo_qwen3_vl.ipynb) | GRPO Qwen3-VL with QLoRA using TRL on free Colab | [](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/grpo_qwen3_vl.ipynb) |
| [`examples/scripts/sft.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft.py) | This script shows how to use the `SFTTrainer` to fine tune a model or adapters into a target dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/vsft_llava.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/vsft_llava.py) | This script shows how to use the `SFTTrainer` to fine tune a Vision Language Model in a chat setting, the script has been tested on a llava1.5 model so users may see unexpected behaviour in other model architectures. |
| [`examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py) | This script shows how to use the `RewardTrainer` to train a reward model on your own dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/ppo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo.py) | This script shows how to use the `PPOTrainer` to fine-tune a sentiment analysis model using IMDB dataset |
| [`examples/scripts/ppo_multi_adapter.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo_multi_adapter.py) | This script shows how to use the `PPOTrainer` to train a single base model with multiple adapters. Requires you to run the example script with the reward model training beforehand. |
| [`examples/scripts/stable_diffusion_tuning_example.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/stable_diffusion_tuning_example.py) | This script shows to use DDPOTrainer to fine-tune a stable diffusion model using reinforcement learning. |
Scripts are maintained in the [`trl/scripts`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts) and [`examples/scripts`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts) directories. They show how to use different trainers such as `SFTTrainer`, `PPOTrainer`, `DPOTrainer`, `GRPOTrainer`, and more.
Here are also some easier-to-run colab notebooks that you can use to get started with TRL:
File | Description |
| --- | --- |
| [`examples/scripts/bco.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/bco.py) | This script shows how to use the [`KTOTrainer`] with the BCO loss to fine-tune a model to increase instruction-following, truthfulness, honesty, and helpfulness using the [openbmb/UltraFeedback](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/cpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/cpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`CPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to increase helpfulness and harmlessness using the [Anthropic/hh-rlhf](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset. |
| [`trl/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/dpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`DPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`DPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a Vision Language Model to reduce hallucinations using the [openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py) | This script shows how to use [`HfPairwiseJudge`] or [`OpenAIPairwiseJudge`] to judge model generations. |
| [`examples/scripts/gkd.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gkd.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GKDTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`trl/scripts/grpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/grpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a multimodal model for reasoning using the [lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/gspo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gspo.py) | This script shows how to use GSPO via the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune model for reasoning using the [AI-MO/NuminaMath-TIR](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI-MO/NuminaMath-TIR) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/gspo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gspo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use GSPO via the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a multimodal model for reasoning using the [lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/kto.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/kto.py) | This script shows how to use the [`KTOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/mpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/mpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use MPO via the [`DPOTrainer`] to align a model based on preferences using the [HuggingFaceH4/rlaif-v_formatted](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/rlaif-v_formatted) dataset and a set of loss weights with weights. |
| [`examples/scripts/nash_md.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/nash_md.py) | This script shows how to use the [`NashMDTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/online_dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/online_dpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/online_dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/online_dpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a a Vision Language Model. |
| [`examples/scripts/orpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/orpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`ORPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to increase helpfulness and harmlessness using the [Anthropic/hh-rlhf](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/ppo/ppo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo/ppo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to continue text with positive sentiment or physically descriptive language. |
| [`examples/scripts/ppo/ppo_tldr.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo/ppo_tldr.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to generate TL;DR summaries. |
| [`examples/scripts/prm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/prm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PRMTrainer`] to fine-tune a Process-supervised Reward Model (PRM). |
| [`examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py) | This script shows how to use the [`RewardTrainer`] to train an Outcome Reward Model (ORM) on your own dataset. |
| [`examples/scripts/rloo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/rloo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`RLOOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to solve math questions. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/sft.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft_gemma3.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_gemma3.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Gemma 3 model. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft_video_llm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_video_llm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Video Language Model. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Vision Language Model in a chat setting. The script has only been tested with [LLaVA 1.5](https://huggingface.co/llava-hf/llava-1.5-7b-hf), [LLaVA 1.6](https://huggingface.co/llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf), and [Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct) models, so users may see unexpected behaviour in other model architectures. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm_gemma3.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm_gemma3.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Gemma 3 model on vision to text tasks. |
| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm_smol_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm_smol_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a SmolVLM model. |
| [`examples/scripts/xpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/xpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`XPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
| [`examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to use the "Best of N" sampling strategy using TRL when fine-tuning your model with PPO. |
| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 imdb sentiment tuning example on a jupyter notebook. |
| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 sentiment control example on a jupyter notebook. |
We also have some other examples that are less maintained but can be used as a reference:
1.**[research_projects](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/research_projects)**: Check out this folder to find the scripts used for some research projects that used TRL (LM de-toxification, Stack-Llama, etc.)
## Distributed training
All of the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs by providing the path of an 🤗 Accelerate config file when calling `accelerate launch`. To launch one of them on one or multiple GPUs, run the following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine and `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments.)
You can run scripts on multiple GPUs with 🤗 Accelerate:
You can also adjust the parameters of the 🤗 Accelerate config file to suit your needs (e.g. training in mixed precision).
### Distributed training with DeepSpeed
Most of the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs together with DeepSpeed ZeRO-{1,2,3} for efficient sharding of the optimizer states, gradients, and model weights. To do so, run following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine, `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments, and `--deepspeed_config` with the path to the DeepSpeed config file such as `examples/deepspeed_configs/deepspeed_zero1.yaml`):
This directory contains a minimal, clearly separated space for fast iteration on new ideas.
> [!WARNING]
> **Stability contract:** Anything under `trl.experimental` may change or be removed in *any* release (including patch versions) without prior deprecation. Do not rely on these APIs for production workloads.
## Promotion Path (Simple)
1.**Prototype outside the main repo:** Start development in your own fork or a separate repository to iterate quickly.
2.**Experimental inclusion:** Once it’s ready for early users, move the idea into `trl.experimental.<feature>`.
3.**Improve:** Add tests, a short doc/example, and demonstrate the usage.
4.**Promote:** Once the API proves stable and there is clear interest or adoption from the community, move it into `trl.<feature>` (stable module).
## FAQ
**Why not just use branches?**
Because branches are not shipped to users; experimental code inside the package lets early adopters try things and give feedback.
**Can these APIs change or vanish without warning?**
Yes. Anything inside `trl.experimental` can change or disappear in *any* release.
**Should I use this in production?**
Only if you are fine with updating your code quickly when things change.
**Will maintainers promptly fix issues in `trl.experimental`?**
Not necessarily. The experimental module is a playground for new ideas, and maintainers may not prioritize bug fixes or feature requests there. Issues may remain unresolved until (or unless) the feature graduates to the stable API.
This feature implements the GFPO algorithm to enforce concise reasoning in the model's output generation, as proposed in the paper [Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.09726).
## Usage
To activate GFPO in [`GFPOTrainer`]:
- set `num_remains_in_group` in [`GFPOConfig`]
- define a group filter function and set it to `group_filter_func` in [`GFPOTrainer`]. `group_filter_func` will score the `num_generations` completions and The GFPOTrainer filters groups according to their scores to get top `num_remains_in_group` completions as a new group. Model will be trained on the filtered group.
Generalized Knowledge Distillation (GKD) was proposed in [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://huggingface.co/papers/2306.13649) by Rishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk, Sabela Ramos, Matthieu Geist, and Olivier Bachem.
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Knowledge distillation (KD) is widely used for compressing a teacher model to reduce its inference cost and memory footprint, by training a smaller student model. However, current KD methods for auto-regressive sequence models suffer from distribution mismatch between output sequences seen during training and those generated by the student during inference. To address this issue, we introduce Generalized Knowledge Distillation (GKD). Instead of solely relying on a fixed set of output sequences, GKD trains the student on its self-generated output sequences by leveraging feedback from the teacher on such sequences. Unlike supervised KD approaches, GKD also offers the flexibility to employ alternative loss functions between the student and teacher, which can be useful when the student lacks the expressivity to mimic the teacher's distribution. Furthermore, GKD facilitates the seamless integration of distillation with RL fine-tuning (RLHF). We demonstrate the efficacy of GKD for distilling auto-regressive language models on summarization, translation, and arithmetic reasoning tasks, and task-agnostic distillation for instruction-tuning.
The key aspects of GKD are:
1. It addresses the train-inference distribution mismatch in auto-regressive sequence models by training the student model on its self-generated output sequences.
2. GKD allows flexibility in choosing different divergence measures between student and teacher models via the generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD), which can be useful when the student lacks the capacity to fully mimic the teacher.
This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif) and [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun).
## Usage tips
The [`GKDTrainer`] is a wrapper around the [`SFTTrainer`] class that takes in a teacher model argument. It needs three parameters to be set via the [`GKDConfig`] namely:
*`lmbda`: controls the student data fraction, i.e., the proportion of on-policy student-generated outputs. When `lmbda=0.0`, the loss reduces to supervised JSD where the student is trained with the token-level probabilities of the teacher. When `lmbda=1.0`, the loss reduces to on-policy JSD, where the student generates output sequences and token-specific feedback on these sequences from the teacher. For values in between [0, 1] it is random between the two based on the `lmbda` value for each batch.
*`seq_kd`: controls whether to perform Sequence-Level KD (can be viewed as supervised FT on teacher-generated out). When `seq_kd=True` and `lmbda=0.0`, the loss reduces to supervised JSD, where the teacher generates output sequences and the student receives token-specific feedback on these sequences from the teacher.
*`beta`: controls the interpolation in the generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence. When `beta=0.0` the loss approximates forward KL divergence, while for `beta=1.0` the loss approximates reverse KL divergence. For values in between [0, 1] it interpolates between the two.
The authors find that on-policy data (high `lmbda`) performs better and the optimal `beta` varied depending on the task and evaluation method.
> [!WARNING]
> Make sure that `attn_implementation="flash_attention_2"` when training [Gemma models](https://huggingface.co/models?other=gemma2). Otherwise you will encounter NaNs in the logits due to the [soft capping technique](https://huggingface.co/blog/gemma2#soft-capping-and-attention-implementations) adopted by this architecture.
General Online Logit Distillation (GOLD) is an extension of Universal Logit Distillation (ULD) that supports
student/teacher pairs with different tokenizers. It aligns the textual spans produced by both tokenizers and merges the
associated logits so no completion tokens are dropped. This enables cross-tokenizer knowledge distillation, including
mixed model families (for example, LLaMA students with Qwen teachers).
Key capabilities:
1.**Cross-tokenizer alignment**– GOLD incrementally decodes the student and teacher tokens, groups passages with the same visible text, and merges probabilities inside each group. This guarantees loss terms are computed over the full completion even when token boundaries differ.
2.**Hybrid ULD loss**– when `uld_use_hybrid_loss` is enabled, GOLD compares exact vocabulary matches directly and falls back to the original sorted-probability ULD loss for unmatched tokens. This improves stability for students whose vocabularies only partially overlap with the teacher.
3.**Seamless integration with GKD**– GOLD inherits the on-policy vs. off-policy scheduling from the [`GKDTrainer`](./gkd_trainer.md), so you can combine sequence-level KD, generalized JSD, and cross-tokenizer distillation in a single training run.
> [!NOTE]
> GOLD is currently part of the `trl.experimental` namespace. APIs may change without notice while the feature is iterated on.
## Usage tips
The [`GOLDTrainer`] subclasses [`SFTTrainer`] and accepts the same datasets as other TRL trainers (lists of ChatML style
messages). Important configuration flags on [`GOLDConfig`] include:
*`use_uld_loss`– toggles Universal Logit Distillation. Set this to `True` for cross-tokenizer setups.
*`teacher_tokenizer_name_or_path`– required when `use_uld_loss=True`; GOLD uses the teacher tokenizer to align tokens.
*`uld_use_hybrid_loss`, `uld_hybrid_matched_weight`, `uld_hybrid_unmatched_weight`– enables and weights the hybrid
matched/unmatched loss.
*`beta`, `lmbda`, `seq_kd`– inherited from `GKDConfig`, controlling the generalized JSD interpolation and on-policy
For quick-start workflows you can rely on string identifiers as shown above—the trainer will load the model and tokenizer for you. Explicitly instantiating `AutoModelForCausalLM`, `AutoTokenizer`, or populating `GOLDConfig` is recommended only for advanced use cases where you need fine-grained control over initialization.
A more explicit setup might look like this when you need to customise model loading, tokenizer settings, or training arguments:
TRL supports the GRPO Trainer for training language models, as described in the paper [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300) by [Zhihong Shao](https://huggingface.co/syhia), [Peiyi Wang](https://huggingface.co/peiyiwang89), [Qihao Zhu](https://huggingface.co/zqh11), Runxin Xu, [Junxiao Song](https://huggingface.co/haha-point), Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, [Daya Guo](https://huggingface.co/guoday).
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Mathematical reasoning poses a significant challenge for language models due to its complex and structured nature. In this paper, we introduce DeepSeekMath 7B, which continues pre-training DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B with 120B math-related tokens sourced from Common Crawl, together with natural language and code data. DeepSeekMath 7B has achieved an impressive score of 51.7% on the competition-level MATH benchmark without relying on external toolkits and voting techniques, approaching the performance level of Gemini-Ultra and GPT-4. Self-consistency over 64 samples from DeepSeekMath 7B achieves 60.9% on MATH. The mathematical reasoning capability of DeepSeekMath is attributed to two key factors: First, we harness the significant potential of publicly available web data through a meticulously engineered data selection pipeline. Second, we introduce Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a variant of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), that enhances mathematical reasoning abilities while concurrently optimizing the memory usage of PPO.
This post-training method was contributed by [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec).
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the GRPO method. We train a [Qwen 0.5B Instruct model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) with the prompts from the [UltraFeedback prompts dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt). You can view the data in the dataset here:
GRPO is an online learning algorithm, meaning it improves iteratively by using the data generated by the trained model itself during training. The intuition behind GRPO objective is to maximize the advantage of the generated completions, while ensuring that the model remains close to the reference policy. To understand how GRPO works, it can be broken down into four main steps: **Generating completions**, **computing the advantage**, **estimating the KL divergence**, and **computing the loss**.
At each training step, we sample a batch of prompts and generate a set of \\( G \\) completions for each prompt (denoted as \\( o_i \\)).
### Computing the advantage
For each of the \\( G \\) sequences, we compute the reward using a reward model or reward function. To align with the comparative nature of reward models—typically trained on datasets of comparisons between outputs for the same question—the advantage is calculated to reflect these relative comparisons. It is normalized as follows:
This approach gives the method its name: **Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)**.
> [!TIP]
> It was shown in the paper [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783) that scaling by \\( \text{std}(\mathbf{r}) \\) may cause a question-level difficulty bias. You can disable this scaling by setting `scale_rewards=False` in [`GRPOConfig`].
> [!TIP]
> As shown in [Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning (Lite PPO)](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.08221), calculating the mean at the local (group) level and the standard deviation at the global (batch) level enables more robust reward shaping. You can use this scaling strategy by setting `scale_rewards="batch"` in [`GRPOConfig`].
### Estimating the KL divergence
KL divergence is estimated using the approximator introduced by [Schulman et al. (2020)](http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html). The approximator is defined as follows:
> Note that compared to the original formulation in [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300), we don't scale by \\( \frac{1}{|o_i|} \\) because it was shown in the paper [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783) that this introduces a response-level length bias. More details in [loss types](#loss-types).
> [!TIP]
> Note that compared to the original formulation in [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300), we use \\( \beta = 0.0 \\) by default, meaning that the KL divergence term is not used. This choice is motivated by several recent studies (e.g., [Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.24290)) which have shown that the KL divergence term is not essential for training with GRPO. As a result, it has become common practice to exclude it (e.g. [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783), [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476)). If you wish to include the KL divergence term, you can set `beta` in [`GRPOConfig`] to a non-zero value.
The [DAPO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476) highlightsthelimitationsoftheGRPOalgorithm’ssample-levellossinlong-CoTscenarios,wherelongerresponsesareunder-penalized,leadingtopoorerqualityoutputs.Theproposedsolutionisatoken-levelnormalization,whichbetterhandleslongersequencesbyassigningmorebalancedrewardstoindividualtokens,regardlessofresponselength:
-`clip_ratio/high_max`: The maximum ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities that were clipped on the upper bound of the trust region: \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) > 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high}\\).
## Customization
### Speed up training with vLLM-powered generation
Generation is often the main bottleneck when training with online methods. To accelerate generation, you can use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm), a high-throughput, low-latency inference engine for LLMs. To enable it, first install the package with
```shell
pip install trl[vllm]
```
We support two ways of using vLLM during training: **server mode** and **colocate mode**.
> [!TIP]
> By default, Truncated Importance Sampling is activated for vLLM generation to address the generation-training mismatch that occurs when using different frameworks. This can be turned off by setting `vllm_importance_sampling_correction=False`. For more information, see [Truncated Importance Sampling](paper_index#truncated-importance-sampling)
#### 🔌 Option 1: Server mode
In this mode, vLLM runs in a separate process (and using separate GPUs) and communicates with the trainer via HTTP. This is ideal if you have dedicated GPUs for inference.
1.**Start the vLLM server**:
```bash
trl vllm-serve --model <model_name>
```
2. **Enable server mode in your training script**:
```python
from trl import GRPOConfig
training_args = GRPOConfig(
...,
use_vllm=True,
vllm_mode="server", # default value, can be omitted
)
```
> [!WARNING]
> Make sure that the server is using different GPUs than the trainer, otherwise you may run into NCCL errors. You can specify the GPUs to use with the `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` environment variable.
#### 🧩 Option 2: Colocate mode
In this mode, vLLM runs inside the trainer process and shares GPU memory with the training model. This avoids launching a separate server and can improve GPU utilization, but may lead to memory contention on the training GPUs.
```python
from trl import GRPOConfig
training_args = GRPOConfig(
...,
use_vllm=True,
vllm_mode="colocate",
)
```
> [!TIP]
> Depending on the model size and the overall GPU memory requirements for training, you may need to adjust the `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` parameter in [`GRPOConfig`] to avoid underutilization or out-of-memory errors.
>
> We provide a [HF Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/trl-lib/recommend-vllm-memory) to help estimate the recommended GPU memory utilization based on your model configuration and experiment settings. Simply use it as follows to get `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` recommendation:
> If the recommended value does not work in your environment, we suggest adding a small buffer (e.g., +0.05 or +0.1) to the recommended value to ensure stability.
>
> If you still find you are getting out-of-memory errors set `vllm_enable_sleep_mode` to True and the vllm parameters and cache will be offloaded during the optimization step. For more information, see [Reducing Memory Usage with vLLM Sleep Mode](reducing_memory_usage#vllm-sleep-mode).
> [!TIP]
> By default, GRPO uses `MASTER_ADDR=localhost` and `MASTER_PORT=12345` for vLLM, but you can override these values by setting the environment variables accordingly.
For more information, see [Speeding up training with vLLM](speeding_up_training#vllm-for-fast-generation-in-online-methods).
### GRPO at scale: train a 70B+ Model on multiple nodes
When training large models like **Qwen2.5-72B**, you need several key optimizations to make the training efficient and scalable across multiple GPUs and nodes. These include:
- **DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 3**: ZeRO leverages data parallelism to distribute model states (weights, gradients, optimizer states) across multiple GPUs and CPUs, reducing memory and compute requirements on each device. Since large models cannot fit on a single GPU, using ZeRO Stage 3 is required for training such models. For more details, see [DeepSpeed Integration](deepspeed_integration).
- **Accelerate**: Accelerate is a library that simplifies distributed training across multiple GPUs and nodes. It provides a simple API to launch distributed training and handles the complexities of distributed training, such as data parallelism, gradient accumulation, and distributed data loading. For more details, see [Distributing Training](distributing_training).
- **vLLM**: See the previous section on how to use vLLM to speed up generation.
Below is an example SLURM script to train a 70B model with GRPO on multiple nodes. This script trains a model on 4 nodes and uses the 5th node for vLLM-powered generation.
```sh
#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --nodes=5
#SBATCH --gres=gpu:8
# Get the list of allocated nodes
NODELIST=($(scontrol show hostnames $SLURM_JOB_NODELIST))
# Assign the first 4 nodes for training and the 5th node for vLLM
TRAIN_NODES="${NODELIST[@]:0:4}" # Nodes 0, 1, 2, 3 for training
The [`GRPOTrainer`] supports using custom reward functions instead of dense reward models. To ensure compatibility, your reward function must satisfy the following requirements:
1. **Input arguments**:
- The function must accept the following as keyword arguments:
- `prompts` (contains the prompts),
- `completions` (contains the generated completions),
- `completions_ids` (contains the tokenized completions),
- `trainer_state` ([`~transformers.TrainerState`]): The current state of the trainer. This can be used to implement dynamic reward functions, such as curriculum learning, where the reward is adjusted based on the training progress.
- All column names (but `prompt`) that the dataset may have. For example, if the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`, the function will be called with `ground_truth` as a keyword argument.
The easiest way to comply with this requirement is to use `**kwargs` in the function signature.
- Depending on the dataset format, the input will vary:
- For [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of strings.
- For [conversational format](dataset_formats#conversational), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of message dictionaries.
2. **Return value**: The function must return a list of floats. Each float represents the reward corresponding to a single completion.
#### Example 1: Reward longer completions
Below is an example of a reward function for a standard format that rewards longer completions:
```python
def reward_func(completions_ids, **kwargs):
"""Reward function that assigns higher scores to longer completions (in terms of token count)."""
return [float(len(ids)) for ids in completions_ids]
```
You can test it as follows:
```python
>>> prompts = ["The sky is", "The sun is"] # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
>>> completions = [" blue.", " in the sky."] # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
#### Example 2: Reward completions with a specific format
Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format. This example is inspired by the _format reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
It is designed for a conversational format, where prompts and completions consist of structured messages.
```python
import re
def format_reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
"""Reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format."""
#### Example 3: Reward completions based on a reference
Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion is correct. This example is inspired by the _accuracy reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
This example is designed for [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), where the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`.
Below is an example of using multiple reward functions in the [`GRPOTrainer`]. In this example, we define two task-specific reward functions: `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func`. The `math_reward_func` rewards math problems based on their correctness, while the `coding_reward_func` rewards coding problems based on whether the solution works.
```python
from datasets import Dataset
from trl import GRPOTrainer
# Define a dataset that contains both math and coding problems
dataset = Dataset.from_list(
[
{"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "task": "math"},
{"prompt": "Write a function that returns the sum of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
{"prompt": "What is 3*4?", "task": "math"},
{"prompt": "Write a function that returns the product of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
In this example, the `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func` are designed to work with a mixed dataset that contains both math and coding problems. The `task` column in the dataset is used to determine which reward function to apply to each problem. If there is no relevant reward function for a sample in the dataset, the reward function will return `None`, and the [`GRPOTrainer`] will continue with the valid functions and tasks. This allows the [`GRPOTrainer`] to handle multiple reward functions with different applicability.
Note that the [`GRPOTrainer`] will ignore the `None` rewards returned by the reward functions and only consider the rewards returned by the relevant functions. This ensures that the model is trained on the relevant tasks and ignores the tasks for which there is no relevant reward function.
#### Passing the reward function to the trainer
To use your custom reward function, pass it to the [`GRPOTrainer`] as follows:
```python
from trl import GRPOTrainer
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
reward_funcs=reward_func,
...,
)
```
If you have multiple reward functions, you can pass them as a list:
```python
from trl import GRPOTrainer
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
reward_funcs=[reward_func1, reward_func2],
...,
)
```
and the reward will be computed as the sum of the rewards from each function, or the weighted sum if `reward_weights` is provided in the config.
Note that [`GRPOTrainer`] supports multiple reward functions of different types. See the parameters documentation for more details.
## Vision-Language Model (VLM) Training
GRPO supports training Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on multimodal datasets containing both text and images.
> Compatibility with all VLMs is not guaranteed. If you believe a model should be supported, feel free to open an issue on GitHub — or better yet, submit a pull request with the required changes.
### Quick Start
Use [grpo\_vlm.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py) to fine-tune a VLM. Example command for training on [`lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified):
> For VLMs, truncating may remove image tokens, leading to errors during training. To avoid this, set `max_prompt_length=None` in the [`GRPOConfig`]. This allows the model to process the full sequence length without truncating image tokens.
>
> ```python
> GRPOConfig(max_prompt_length=None, ...)
> ```
>
> Only use `max_prompt_length` when you've verified that truncation won't remove image tokens for the entire dataset.
- Use LoRA on vision-language projection layers
- Enable 4-bit quantization to reduce memory usage
- VLMs are memory-intensive — start with smaller batch sizes
- Most models are compatible with vLLM (`server` and `colocate` modes)
### Dataset Format
Each training sample should include:
- `prompt`: Text formatted via the processor's chat template
- `image`/`images`: PIL Image or list of PIL Images
The trainer automatically handles image-to-tensor conversion via the model’s image processor.
This experimental trainer, trains a model with GRPO but replaces groups (and corresponding completions) that have 0 standard deviation with groups with high rewards and standard deviation that've been used to train a model in prior batches.
In the paper [Group Sequence Policy Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2507.18071), the authors propose a token-level objective variant to GSPO, called GSPO-token. To use GSPO-token, you can use the `GRPOTrainer` class in `trl.experimental.gspo_token`.
## Usage
```python
fromtrl.experimental.gspo_tokenimportGRPOTrainer
fromtrlimportGRPOConfig
training_args=GRPOConfig(
importance_sampling_level="sequence_token",
...
)
```
> [!WARNING]
> To leverage GSPO-token, the user will need to provide the per-token advantage \\( \hat{A_{i,t}} \\) for each token \\( t \\) in the sequence \\( i \\) (i.e., make \\( \hat{A_{i,t}} \\) varies with \\( t \\)—which isn't the case here, \\( \hat{A_{i,t}}=\hat{A_{i}} \\)). Otherwise, GSPO-Token gradient is just equivalent to the original GSPO implementation.
When performing classical supervised fine-tuning of language models, the loss (especially the validation loss) serves as a good indicator of the training progress. However, in Reinforcement Learning (RL), the loss becomes less informative about the model's performance, and its value may fluctuate while the actual performance improves.
To address this, we recommend focusing on two key metrics first:
**Mean Reward**: The primary goal is to maximize the reward achieved by the model during RL training.
**Objective KL Divergence**: KL divergence (Kullback-Leibler divergence) measures the dissimilarity between two probability distributions. In the context of RL training, we use it to quantify the difference between the current model and a reference model. Ideally, we want to keep the KL divergence between 0 and 10 to ensure the model's generated text remains close to what the reference model produces.
However, there are more metrics that can be useful for debugging, checkout the [logging section](logging).
## Why Do We Use a Reference Model, and What's the Purpose of KL Divergence?
When training RL models, optimizing solely for reward may lead to unexpected behaviors, where the model exploits the environment in ways that don't align with good language generation. In the case of RLHF, we use a reward model trained to predict whether a generated text is highly ranked by humans.
However, the RL model being optimized against the reward model may learn patterns that yield high reward but do not represent good language. This can result in extreme cases where the model generates texts with excessive exclamation marks or emojis to maximize the reward. In some worst-case scenarios, the model may generate patterns completely unrelated to natural language yet receive high rewards, similar to adversarial attacks.
<pstyle="text-align: center;"><b>Figure:</b> Samples without a KL penalty from <ahref="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf">https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf</a>. </p>
</div>
To address this issue, we add a penalty to the reward function based on the KL divergence between the current model and the reference model. By doing this, we encourage the model to stay close to what the reference model generates.
## What Is the Concern with Negative KL Divergence?
If you generate text by purely sampling from the model distribution things work fine in general. But when you use the `generate` method there are a few caveats because it does not always purely sample depending on the settings which can cause KL-divergence to go negative. Essentially when the active model achieves `log_p_token_active < log_p_token_ref` we get negative KL-div. This can happen in a several cases:
- **top-k sampling**: the model can smooth out the probability distribution causing the top-k tokens having a smaller probability than those of the reference model but they still are selected
- **min_length**: this ignores the EOS token until `min_length` is reached. thus the model can assign a very low log prob to the EOS token and very high probs to all others until min_length is reached
These are just a few examples. Why is negative KL an issue? The total reward `R` is computed `R = r - beta * KL` so if the model can learn how to drive KL-divergence negative it effectively gets a positive reward. In many cases it can be much easier to exploit such a bug in the generation than actually learning the reward function. In addition the KL can become arbitrarily small thus the actual reward can be very small compared to it.
So how should you generate text for PPO training? Let's have a look!
## How to generate text for training?
In order to avoid the KL issues described above we recommend to use the following settings:
```python
generation_kwargs={
"min_length":-1,# don't ignore the EOS token (see above)
"top_k":0.0,# no top-k sampling
"top_p":1.0,# no nucleus sampling
"do_sample":True,# yes, we want to sample
"pad_token_id":tokenizer.eos_token_id,# most decoder models don't have a padding token - use EOS token instead
"max_new_tokens":32,# specify how many tokens you want to generate at most
}
```
With these settings we usually don't encounter any issues. You can also experiments with other settings but if you encounter issues with negative KL-divergence try to go back to these and see if they persist.
## How can debug your own use-case?
Debugging the RL pipeline can be challenging due to its complexity. Here are some tips and suggestions to make the process easier:
- **Start from a working example**: Begin with a working example from the trl repository and gradually modify it to fit your specific use-case. Changing everything at once can make it difficult to identify the source of potential issues. For example, you can start by replacing the model in the example and once you figure out the best hyperparameters try to switch to your dataset and reward model. If you change everything at once you won't know where a potential problem comes from.
- **Start small, scale later**: Training large models can be very slow and take several hours or days until you see any improvement. For debugging this is not a convenient timescale so try to use small model variants during the development phase and scale up once that works. That being said you sometimes have to be careful as small models might not have the capacity to solve a complicated task either.
- **Start simple**: Try to start with a minimal example and build complexity from there. Your use-case might require for example a complicated reward function consisting of many different rewards - try to use one signal first and see if you can optimize that and then add more complexity after that.
- **Inspect the generations**: It's always a good idea to inspect what the model is generating. Maybe there is a bug in your post-processing or your prompt. Due to bad settings you might cut-off generations too soon. These things are very hard to see on the metrics but very obvious if you look at the generations.
- **Inspect the reward model**: If you reward is not improving over time maybe there's an issue with the reward model. You can look at extreme cases to see if it does what it should: e.g. in the sentiment case you can check if simple positive and negative examples really get different rewards. And you can look at the distribution of your dataset. Finally, maybe the reward is dominated by the query which the model can't affect so you might need to normalize this (e.g. reward of query+response minus reward of the query).
These are just a few tips that we find helpful - if you have more useful tricks feel free to open a PR to add them as well!
TRL is a full stack library where we provide a set of tools to train transformer language models with methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Reward Modeling, and more.
The library is integrated with 🤗 [transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers).
## 🎉 What's New
**OpenEnv Integration:** TRL now supports **[OpenEnv](https://huggingface.co/blog/openenv)**, the open-source framework from Meta for defining, deploying, and interacting with environments in reinforcement learning and agentic workflows.
Explore how to seamlessly integrate TRL with OpenEnv in our [dedicated documentation](openenv).
## Taxonomy
Below is the current list of TRL trainers, organized by method type (⚡️ = vLLM support; 🧪 = experimental).
TRL is a full stack library where we provide a set of tools to train transformer language models with Reinforcement Learning, from the Supervised Fine-tuning step (SFT), Reward Modeling step (RM) to the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) step.
The library is integrated with 🤗 [transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers).
You can install TRL either from PyPI or from source:
## PyPI
Install the library with pip or [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/):
<hfoptionsid="install">
<hfoptionid="uv">
uv is a fast Rust-based Python package and project manager. Refer to [Installation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/) for installation instructions.
```bash
uv pip install trl
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="pip">
```bash
pip install trl
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
## Source
You can also install the latest version from source. First clone the repo and then run the installation with `pip`:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
cd trl/
pip install -e .
```
If you want the development install you can replace the pip install with the following:
Iterative fine-tuning is a training method that enables to perform custom actions (generation and filtering for example) between optimization steps. In TRL we provide an easy-to-use API to fine-tune your models in an iterative way in just a few lines of code.
## Usage
To get started quickly, instantiate an instance a model, and a tokenizer.
```python
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
You have the choice to either provide a list of strings or a list of tensors to the step function.
#### Using a list of tensors as input:
```python
inputs = {
"input_ids": input_ids,
"attention_mask": attention_mask
}
trainer.step(**inputs)
```
#### Using a list of strings as input:
```python
inputs = {
"texts": texts
}
trainer.step(**inputs)
```
For causal language models, labels will automatically be created from input_ids or from texts. When using sequence to sequence models you will have to provide your own labels or text_labels.
[Hugging Face Jobs](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs) lets you run training scripts on fully managed infrastructure—no need to manage GPUs or local environment setup.
In this guide, you'll learn how to:
* Use [TRL Jobs](https://github.com/huggingface/trl-jobs) to easily run pre-optimized TRL training
* Run any TRL training script with uv scripts
For general details about Hugging Face Jobs (hardware selection, job monitoring, etc.), see the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs).
## Requirements
* A [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan
* Logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`)
## Using TRL Jobs
[TRL Jobs](https://github.com/huggingface/trl-jobs) is a high-level wrapper around Hugging Face Jobs and TRL that streamlines training. It provides optimized default configurations so you can start quickly without manually tuning parameters.
Launch the job using either the [`hf jobs` CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/cli#hf-jobs) or the Python API:
<hfoptionsid="script_type">
<hfoptionid="bash">
```bash
hf jobs uv run \
--flavor a100-large \
--with trl \
--secrets HF_TOKEN \
train.py
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="python">
```python
fromhuggingface_hubimportrun_uv_job
run_uv_job(
"train.py",
dependencies=["trl"],
flavor="a100-large",
secrets={"HF_TOKEN":"hf_..."},
)
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
To run successfully, the script needs:
* **TRL installed**: Use the `--with trl` flag or the `dependencies` argument. uv installs these dependencies automatically before running the script.
* **An authentication token**: Required to push the trained model (or perform other authenticated operations). Provide it with the `--secrets HF_TOKEN` flag or the `secrets` argument.
> [!WARNING]
> When training with Jobs, be sure to:
>
> * **Set a sufficient timeout**. Jobs time out after 30 minutes by default. If your job exceeds the timeout, it will fail and all progress will be lost. See [Setting a custom timeout](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs#setting-a-custom-timeout).
> * **Push the model to the Hub**. The Jobs environment is ephemeral—files are deleted when the job ends. If you don’t push the model, it will be lost.
You can then run the script without specifying dependencies:
<hfoptionsid="script_type">
<hfoptionid="bash">
```bash
hf jobs uv run \
--flavor a100-large \
--secrets HF_TOKEN \
train.py
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="python">
```python
fromhuggingface_hubimportrun_uv_job
run_uv_job(
"train.py",
flavor="a100-large",
secrets={"HF_TOKEN":"hf_..."},
)
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
TRL example scripts are fully uv-compatible, so you can run a complete training workflow directly on Jobs. You can customize training with standard script arguments plus hardware and secrets:
See the full list of examples in [Maintained examples](example_overview#maintained-examples).
### Docker Images
An up-to-date Docker image with all TRL dependencies is available at [huggingface/trl](https://hub.docker.com/r/huggingface/trl) and can be used directly with Hugging Face Jobs:
<hfoptionsid="script_type">
<hfoptionid="bash">
```bash
hf jobs uv run \
--flavor a100-large \
--secrets HF_TOKEN \
--image huggingface/trl \
train.py
```
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="python">
```python
fromhuggingface_hubimportrun_uv_job
run_uv_job(
"train.py",
flavor="a100-large",
secrets={"HF_TOKEN":"hf_..."},
image="huggingface/trl",
)
```
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
Jobs runs on a Docker image from Hugging Face Spaces or Docker Hub, so you can also specify any custom image:
> TRL Judges is an experimental API which is subject to change at any time.
TRL provides judges to easily compare two completions.
Make sure to have installed the required dependencies by running:
```bash
pip install trl[judges]
```
## Using the provided judges
TRL provides several judges out of the box. For example, you can use the [`HfPairwiseJudge`] to compare two completions using a pre-trained model from the Hugging Face model hub:
```python
fromtrlimportHfPairwiseJudge
judge=HfPairwiseJudge()
judge.judge(
prompts=["What is the capital of France?","What is the biggest planet in the solar system?"],
To define your own judge, we provide several base classes that you can subclass. For rank-based judges, you need to subclass [`BaseRankJudge`] and implement the [`BaseRankJudge.judge`] method. For pairwise judges, you need to subclass [`BasePairJudge`] and implement the [`BasePairJudge.judge`] method. If you want to define a judge that doesn't fit into these categories, you need to subclass [`BaseJudge`] and implement the [`BaseJudge.judge`] method.
As an example, let's define a pairwise judge that prefers shorter completions:
The [`kernels`](https://huggingface.co/blog/hello-hf-kernels#get-started-and-next-steps) library allows optimized compute kernels to be loaded directly from the Hub.
You can find `kernels` in [dedicated orgs](https://huggingface.co/kernels-community) or by searching for the [`kernel` tag](https://huggingface.co/models?other=kernel) within the Hub.
Kernels are **optimized code pieces** that help in model development, training, and inference. Here, we’ll focus on their **integration with TRL**, but check out the above resources to learn more about them.
## Installation
To use kernels with TRL, you'd need to install the library in your Python environment:
```bash
pip install kernels
```
## Using Kernels from the Hub in TRL
Kernels can directly replace attention implementations, removing the need to manually compile attention backends like Flash Attention and boosting training speed just by pulling the respective attention kernel from the Hub.
You can specify a kernel when loading a model:
```python
fromtransformersimportAutoModelForCausalLM
model=AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"your-model-name",
attn_implementation="kernels-community/flash-attn"# other options: kernels-community/vllm-flash-attn3, kernels-community/paged-attention
> Now you can leverage faster attention backends with a pre-optimized kernel for your hardware configuration from the Hub, speeding up both development and training.
## Comparing Attention Implementations
We evaluated various attention implementations available in transformers, along with different kernel backends, using **TRL** and **SFT**.
The experiments were run on a single **H100 GPU** with **CUDA 12.9**, leveraging **Qwen3-8B** with a **batch size of 8**, **gradient accumulation of 1**, and **bfloat16** precision.
Keep in mind that the results shown here are specific to this setup and may vary with different training configurations.
The following figure illustrates both **latency** (time per training step) and **peak allocated memory** for the different attention implementations and kernel backends.
Kernel-based implementations perform on par with custom-installed attention, and increasing the model’s `max_length` further enhances performance. Memory consumption is similar across all implementations, showing no significant differences. We get the same performance but with less friction, as described in [the following section](#flash-attention-vs-hub-kernels).
<divclass="flex justify-center">
<imgsrc="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/kernels_guide_latency.png"alt="Latency and Memory Usage"width="45%"/>
<imgsrc="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/kernels_guide_peak_allocated_memory.png"alt="Latency and Memory Usage"width="45%"/>
</div>
## Flash Attention vs. Hub Kernels
Building Flash Attention from source can be time-consuming, often taking anywhere from several minutes to hours, depending on your hardware, CUDA/PyTorch configuration, and whether precompiled wheels are available.
In contrast, **Hugging Face Kernels** provide a much faster and more reliable workflow. Developers don’t need to worry about complex setups—everything is handled automatically. In our benchmarks, kernels were ready to use in about **2.5 seconds**, with no compilation required. This allows you to start training almost instantly, significantly accelerating development. Simply specify the desired version, and `kernels` takes care of the rest.
## Combining FlashAttention Kernels with Liger Kernels
You can combine **FlashAttention kernels** with **Liger kernels** for additional TRL performance improvements.
First, install the Liger kernel dependency:
```bash
pip install liger-kernel
```
Then, combine both in your code:
```python
fromtransformersimportAutoModelForCausalLM
fromtrlimportSFTConfig
model=AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"your-model-name",
attn_implementation="kernels-community/flash-attn"# choose the desired FlashAttention variant
)
training_args=SFTConfig(
use_liger_kernel=True,
# ... other TRL training args
)
```
Learn more about the [Liger Kernel Integration](./liger_kernel_integration).
Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO) was introduced in [KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.01306) by [Kawin Ethayarajh](https://huggingface.co/kawine), [Winnie Xu](https://huggingface.co/xwinxu), [Niklas Muennighoff](https://huggingface.co/Muennighoff), Dan Jurafsky, [Douwe Kiela](https://huggingface.co/douwekiela).
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Kahneman & Tversky's prospect theory tells us that humans perceive random variables in a biased but well-defined manner; for example, humans are famously loss-averse. We show that objectives for aligning LLMs with human feedback implicitly incorporate many of these biases -- the success of these objectives (e.g., DPO) over cross-entropy minimization can partly be ascribed to them being human-aware loss functions (HALOs). However, the utility functions these methods attribute to humans still differ from those in the prospect theory literature. Using a Kahneman-Tversky model of human utility, we propose a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, as current methods do. We call this approach Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO), and it matches or exceeds the performance of preference-based methods at scales from 1B to 30B. Crucially, KTO does not need preferences -- only a binary signal of whether an output is desirable or undesirable for a given input. This makes it far easier to use in the real world, where preference data is scarce and expensive.
The official code can be found in [ContextualAI/HALOs](https://github.com/ContextualAI/HALOs).
This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif), [Younes Belkada](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada), [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun) and Pablo Vicente.
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the KTO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [KTO Mix 14k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/kto-mix-14k). You can view the data in the dataset here:
Distributed across 8 x H100 GPUs, the training takes approximately 30 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-KTO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
The best programming language can vary depending on individual preferences, industry-specific requirements, technical skills, and familiarity with the specific use case or task. Here are some widely-used programming languages that have been noted as popular and widely used:
Here are some other factors to consider when choosing a programming language for a project:
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">1</span> JavaScript</strong>: JavaScript is at the heart of the web and can be used for building web applications, APIs, and interactive front-end applications like frameworks like React and Angular. It's similar to C, C++, and F# in syntax structure and is accessible and easy to learn, making it a popular choice for beginners and professionals alike.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">2</span> Java</strong>: Known for its object-oriented programming (OOP) and support for Java 8 and .NET, Java is used for developing enterprise-level software applications, high-performance games, as well as mobile apps, game development, and desktop applications.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">3</span> C++</strong>: Known for its flexibility and scalability, C++ offers comprehensive object-oriented programming and is a popular choice for high-performance computing and other technical fields. It's a powerful platform for building real-world applications and games at scale.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">4</span> Python</strong>: Developed by Guido van Rossum in 1991, Python is a high-level, interpreted, and dynamically typed language known for its simplicity, readability, and versatility.
</code></pre>
## Expected dataset format
KTO requires an [unpaired preference dataset](dataset_formats#unpaired-preference). Alternatively, you can provide a *paired* preference dataset (also known simply as a *preference dataset*). In this case, the trainer will automatically convert it to an unpaired format by separating the chosen and rejected responses, assigning `label = True` to the chosen completions and `label = False` to the rejected ones.
The [`KTOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
In theory, the dataset should contain at least one chosen and one rejected completion. However, some users have successfully run KTO using *only* chosen or only rejected data. If using only rejected data, it is advisable to adopt a conservative learning rate.
## Example script
We provide an example script to train a model using the KTO method. The script is available in [`trl/scripts/kto.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/kto.py)
To test the KTO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/kto-mix-14k), run the following command:
```bash
accelerate launch trl/scripts/kto.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name trl-lib/kto-mix-14k \
--num_train_epochs 1\
--output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-KTO
```
## Usage tips
### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.
To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).
To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
### Batch size recommendations
Use a per-step batch size that is at least 4, and an effective batch size between 16 and 128. Even if your effective batch size is large, if your per-step batch size is poor, then the KL estimate in KTO will be poor.
### Learning rate recommendations
Each choice of `beta` has a maximum learning rate it can tolerate before learning performance degrades. For the default setting of `beta = 0.1`, the learning rate should typically not exceed `1e-6` for most models. As `beta` decreases, the learning rate should also be reduced accordingly. In general, we strongly recommend keeping the learning rate between `5e-7` and `5e-6`. Even with small datasets, we advise against using a learning rate outside this range. Instead, opt for more epochs to achieve better results.
### Imbalanced data
The `desirable_weight` and `undesirable_weight` of the [`KTOConfig`] refer to the weights placed on the losses for desirable/positive and undesirable/negative examples.
By default, they are both 1. However, if you have more of one or the other, then you should upweight the less common type such that the ratio of (`desirable_weight` \\(\times\\) number of positives) to (`undesirable_weight` \\(\times\\) number of negatives) is in the range 1:1 to 4:3.
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
-`rewards/chosen_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
-`rewards/rejected_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
-`logps/chosen_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the chosen completions
-`logps/rejected_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the rejected completions
-`logits/chosen_sum`: the sum of logits of the chosen completions
-`logits/rejected_sum`: the sum of logits of the rejected completions
-`count/chosen`: the count of chosen samples in a batch
-`count/rejected`: the count of rejected samples in a batch
TRL supports the Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO) Trainer for aligning language models with binary feedback data (e.g., upvote/downvote), as described in the [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01306) by Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky, and Douwe Kiela.
For a full example have a look at [`examples/scripts/kto.py`].
Depending on how good your base model is, you may or may not need to do SFT before KTO.
This is different from standard RLHF and DPO, which always require SFT.
## Expected dataset format
The KTO trainer expects a very specific format for the dataset as it does not require pairwise preferences. Since the model will be trained to directly optimize examples that consist of a prompt, model completion, and a label to indicate whether the completion is "good" or "bad", we expect a dataset with the following columns:
- `prompt`
- `completion`
- `label`
for example:
```
kto_dataset_dict = {
"prompt": [
"Hey, hello",
"How are you",
"What is your name?",
"What is your name?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
"Which is the best programming language?",
],
"completion": [
"hi nice to meet you",
"leave me alone",
"I don't have a name",
"My name is Mary",
"Python",
"C++",
"Java",
],
"label": [
True,
False,
False,
True,
True,
False,
False,
],
}
```
where the `prompt` contains the context inputs, `completion` contains the corresponding responses and `label` contains the corresponding flag that indicates if the generated completion is desired (`True`) or undesired (`False`).
A prompt can have multiple responses and this is reflected in the entries being repeated in the dictionary's value arrays.
## Expected model format
The KTO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
## Using the `KTOTrainer`
For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/kto.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `KTOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train and a reference `ref_model` which we will use to calculate the implicit rewards of the preferred and rejected response.
The `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above. Note that the `model` and `ref_model` need to have the same architecture (ie decoder only or encoder-decoder).
The `desirable_weight` and `undesirable_weight` refer to the weights placed on the losses for desirable/positive and undesirable/negative examples.
By default, they are both 1. However, if you have more of one or the other, then you should upweight the less common type such that the ratio of (`desirable_weight` * number of positives) to (`undesirable_weight` * number of negatives) is in the range 1:1 to 4:3.
Using Large Language Models (LLMs) with tools has been a popular topic recently with awesome works such as [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) and [ToolBench](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.16504.pdf). In TRL, we provide a simple example of how to teach LLM to use tools with reinforcement learning.
Here's an overview of the scripts in the [trl repository](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/tree/main/examples/research_projects/tools):
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| [`calculator.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/calculator.py) | Script to train LLM to use a calculator with reinforcement learning. |
| [`triviaqa.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/triviaqa.py) | Script to train LLM to use a wiki tool to answer questions. |
| [`python_interpreter.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/python_interpreter.py) | Script to train LLM to use python interpreter to solve math puzzles. |
<Tip warning={true}>
Note that the scripts above rely heavily on the `TextEnvironment` API which is still under active development. The API may change in the future. Please see [`TextEnvironment`](text_environment) for the related docs.
</Tip>
## Learning to Use a Calculator
The rough idea is as follows:
1. Load a tool such as [ybelkada/simple-calculator](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/simple-calculator) that parse a text calculation like `"14 + 34"` and return the calulated number:
1. Define a reward function that returns a positive reward if the tool returns the correct answer. In the script we create a dummy reward function like `reward_fn = lambda x: 1`, but we override the rewards directly later.
4. Then generate some data such as `tasks = ["\n\nWhat is 13.1-3?", "\n\nWhat is 4*3?"]` and run the environment with `queries, responses, masks, rewards, histories = env.run(tasks)`. The environment will look for the `<call>` token in the prompt and append the tool output to the response; it will also return the mask associated with the response. You can further use the `histories` to visualize the interaction between the model and the tool; `histories[0].show_text()` will show the text with color-coded tool output and `histories[0].show_tokens(tokenizer)` will show visualize the tokens.
1. Finally, we can train the model with `train_stats = ppo_trainer.step(queries, responses, rewards, masks)`. The trainer will use the mask to ignore the tool output when computing the loss, make sure to pass that argument to `step`.
## Experiment results
We trained a model with the above script for 10 random seeds. You can reproduce the run with the following command. Feel free to remove the `--slurm-*` arguments if you don't have access to a slurm cluster.
As we can see, while 1-2 experiments crashed for some reason, most of the runs obtained near perfect proficiency in the calculator task.
## (Early Experiments 🧪): learning to use a wiki tool for question answering
In the [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) paper, it shows an interesting use case that utilizes a Wikipedia Search tool to help answer questions. In this section, we attempt to perform similar experiments but uses RL instead to teach the model to use a wiki tool on the [TriviaQA](https://nlp.cs.washington.edu/triviaqa/) dataset.
<Tip warning={true}>
**Note that many settings are different so the results are not directly comparable.**
</Tip>
### Building a search index
Since [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) did not open source, we needed to first replicate the search index. It is mentioned in their paper that the authors built the search index using a BM25 retriever that indexes the Wikipedia dump from [KILT](https://github.com/facebookresearch/KILT)
Fortunately, [`pyserini`](https://github.com/castorini/pyserini) already implements the BM25 retriever and provides a prebuilt index for the KILT Wikipedia dump. We can use the following code to search the index.
A racket or racquet is a sports implement consisting of a handled frame with an open hoop across which a network of strings or catgut is stretched tightly. It is used for striking a ball or shuttlecock in games such as squash, tennis, racquetball, and badminton. Collectively, these games are known as racket sports. Racket design and manufacturing has changed considerably over the centuries.
The frame of rackets for all sports was traditionally made of solid wood (later laminated wood) and the strings of animal intestine known as catgut. The traditional racket size was limited by the strength and weight of the wooden frame which had to be strong enough to hold the strings and stiff enough to hit the ball or shuttle. Manufacturers started adding non-wood laminates to wood rackets to improve stiffness. Non-wood rackets were made first of steel, then of aluminum, and then carbon fiber composites. Wood is still used for real tennis, rackets, and xare. Most rackets are now made of composite materials including carbon fiber or fiberglass, metals such as titanium alloys, or ceramics.
...
```
We then basically deployed this snippet as a Hugging Face space [here](https://huggingface.co/spaces/vwxyzjn/pyserini-wikipedia-kilt-doc), so that we can use the space as a `transformers.Tool` later.
* use the `bigcode/starcoderbase` model as the base model
* use the `pyserini-wikipedia-kilt-doc` space as the wiki tool and only uses the first paragrahs of the search result, allowing the `TextEnvironment` to obtain at most `max_tool_reponse=400` response tokens from the tool.
* test if the response contain the answer string, if so, give a reward of 1, otherwise, give a reward of 0.
* notice this is a simplified evaluation criteria. In [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761), the authors checks if the first 20 words of the response contain the correct answer.
* used the following prompt that demonstrates the usage of the wiki tool.
```python
prompt = """\
Answer the following question:
Q: In which branch of the arts is Patricia Neary famous?
A: Ballets
A2: <request><Wiki>Patricia Neary<call>Patricia Neary (born October 27, 1942) is an American ballerina, choreographer and ballet director, who has been particularly active in Switzerland. She has also been a highly successful ambassador for the Balanchine Trust, bringing George Balanchine's ballets to 60 cities around the globe.<response>
Result=Ballets<submit>
Q: Who won Super Bowl XX?
A: Chicago Bears
A2: <request><Wiki>Super Bowl XX<call>Super Bowl XX was an American football game between the National Football Conference (NFC) champion Chicago Bears and the American Football Conference (AFC) champion New England Patriots to decide the National Football League (NFL) champion for the 1985 season. The Bears defeated the Patriots by the score of 46–10, capturing their first NFL championship (and Chicago's first overall sports victory) since 1963, three years prior to the birth of the Super Bowl. Super Bowl XX was played on January 26, 1986 at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans.<response>
Result=Chicago Bears<submit>
Q: """
```
### Result and Discussion
Our experiments show that the agent can learn to use the wiki tool to answer questions. The learning curves would go up mostly, but one of the experiment did crash.
Wandb report is [here](https://wandb.ai/costa-huang/cleanRL/reports/TriviaQA-Final-Experiments--Vmlldzo1MjY0ODk5) for further inspection.
Note that the correct rate of the trained model is on the low end, which could be due to the following reasons:
* **incorrect searches:** When given the question `"What is Bruce Willis' real first name?"` if the model searches for `Bruce Willis`, our wiki tool returns "Patrick Poivey (born 18 February 1948) is a French actor. He is especially known for his voice: he is the French dub voice of Bruce Willis since 1988.` But a correct search should be `Walter Bruce Willis (born March 19, 1955) is an American former actor. He achieved fame with a leading role on the comedy-drama series Moonlighting (1985–1989) and appeared in over a hundred films, gaining recognition as an action hero after his portrayal of John McClane in the Die Hard franchise (1988–2013) and other roles.[1][2]"
* **unnecessarily long response**: The wiki tool by default sometimes output very long sequences. E.g., when the wiki tool searches for "Brown Act"
* Our wiki tool returns "The Ralph M. Brown Act, located at California Government Code 54950 "et seq.", is an act of the California State Legislature, authored by Assemblymember Ralph M. Brown and passed in 1953, that guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies."
* [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761)'s wiki tool returns "The Ralph M. Brown Act is an act of the California State Legislature that guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies." which is more succinct.
## (Early Experiments 🧪): solving math puzzles with python interpreter
In this section, we attempt to teach the model to use a python interpreter to solve math puzzles. The rough idea is to give the agent a prompt like the following:
```python
prompt = """\
Example of using a Python API to solve math questions.
Q: Olivia has $23. She bought five bagels for $3 each. How much money does she have left?
<request><PythonInterpreter>
def solution():
money_initial = 23
bagels = 5
bagel_cost = 3
money_spent = bagels * bagel_cost
money_left = money_initial - money_spent
result = money_left
return result
print(solution())
<call>72<response>
Result = 72 <submit>
Q: """
```
Training experiment can be found at https://wandb.ai/lvwerra/trl-gsm8k/runs/a5odv01y
[Liger Kernel](https://github.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel) is a collection of Triton kernels designed specifically for LLM training. It can effectively increase multi-GPU training throughput by 20% and reduce memory usage by 60%. That way, we can **4x** our context length, as described in the benchmark below. They have implemented Hugging Face compatible `RMSNorm`, `RoPE`, `SwiGLU`, `CrossEntropy`, `FusedLinearCrossEntropy`, with more to come. The kernel works out of the box with [FlashAttention](https://github.com/Dao-AILab/flash-attention), [PyTorch FSDP](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/FSDP_tutorial.html), and [Microsoft DeepSpeed](https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed).
With this memory reduction, you can potentially turn off `cpu_offloading` or gradient checkpointing to further boost the performance.
As reinforcement learning algorithms are historically challenging to debug, it's important to pay careful attention to logging.
By default, the TRL [`PPOTrainer`] saves a lot of relevant information to `wandb` or `tensorboard`.
Upon initialization, pass one of these two options to the [`PPOConfig`]:
```
config = PPOConfig(
model_name=args.model_name,
log_with=`wandb`, # or `tensorboard`
)
```
If you want to log with tensorboard, add the kwarg `project_kwargs={"logging_dir": PATH_TO_LOGS}` to the PPOConfig.
## PPO Logging
Here's a brief explanation for the logged metrics provided in the data:
Key metrics to monitor. We want to maximize the reward, maintain a low KL divergence, and maximize entropy:
1. `env/reward_mean`: The average reward obtained from the environment. Alias `ppo/mean_scores`, which is sed to specifically monitor the reward model.
1. `env/reward_std`: The standard deviation of the reward obtained from the environment. Alias ``ppo/std_scores`, which is sed to specifically monitor the reward model.
1. `env/reward_dist`: The histogram distribution of the reward obtained from the environment.
1. `objective/kl`: The mean Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the old and new policies. It measures how much the new policy deviates from the old policy. The KL divergence is used to compute the KL penalty in the objective function.
1. `objective/kl_dist`: The histogram distribution of the `objective/kl`.
1. `objective/kl_coef`: The coefficient for Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence in the objective function.
1. `ppo/mean_non_score_reward`: The **KL penalty** calculated by `objective/kl * objective/kl_coef` as the total reward for optimization to prevent the new policy from deviating too far from the old policy.
1. `objective/entropy`: The entropy of the model's policy, calculated by `-logprobs.sum(-1).mean()`. High entropy means the model's actions are more random, which can be beneficial for exploration.
Training stats:
1. `ppo/learning_rate`: The learning rate for the PPO algorithm.
1. `ppo/policy/entropy`: The entropy of the model's policy, calculated by `pd = torch.nn.functional.softmax(logits, dim=-1); entropy = torch.logsumexp(logits, dim=-1) - torch.sum(pd * logits, dim=-1)`. It measures the randomness of the policy.
1. `ppo/policy/clipfrac`: The fraction of probability ratios (old policy / new policy) that fell outside the clipping range in the PPO objective. This can be used to monitor the optimization process.
1. `ppo/policy/approxkl`: The approximate KL divergence between the old and new policies, measured by `0.5 * masked_mean((logprobs - old_logprobs) ** 2, mask)`, corresponding to the `k2` estimator in http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html
1. `ppo/policy/policykl`: Similar to `ppo/policy/approxkl`, but measured by `masked_mean(old_logprobs - logprobs, mask)`, corresponding to the `k1` estimator in http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html
1. `ppo/policy/ratio`: The histogram distribution of the ratio between the new and old policies, used to compute the PPO objective.
1. `ppo/policy/advantages_mean`: The average of the GAE (Generalized Advantage Estimation) advantage estimates. The advantage function measures how much better an action is compared to the average action at a state.
1. `ppo/policy/advantages`: The histogram distribution of `ppo/policy/advantages_mean`.
1. `ppo/returns/mean`: The mean of the TD(λ) returns, calculated by `returns = advantage + values`, another indicator of model performance. See https://iclr-blog-track.github.io/2022/03/25/ppo-implementation-details/ for more details.
1. `ppo/returns/var`: The variance of the TD(λ) returns, calculated by `returns = advantage + values`, another indicator of model performance.
1. `ppo/val/mean`: The mean of the values, used to monitor the value function's performance.
1. `ppo/val/var` : The variance of the values, used to monitor the value function's performance.
1. `ppo/val/var_explained`: The explained variance for the value function, used to monitor the value function's performance.
1. `ppo/val/clipfrac`: The fraction of the value function's predicted values that are clipped.
1. `ppo/val/vpred`: The predicted values from the value function.
1. `ppo/val/error`: The mean squared error between the `ppo/val/vpred` and returns, used to monitor the value function's performance.
1. `ppo/loss/policy`: The policy loss for the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm.
1. `ppo/loss/value`: The loss for the value function in the PPO algorithm. This value quantifies how well the function estimates the expected future rewards.
1. `ppo/loss/total`: The total loss for the PPO algorithm. It is the sum of the policy loss and the value function loss.
Stats on queries, responses, and logprobs:
1. `tokens/queries_len_mean`: The average length of the queries tokens.
1. `tokens/queries_len_std`: The standard deviation of the length of the queries tokens.
1. `tokens/queries_dist`: The histogram distribution of the length of the queries tokens.
1. `tokens/responses_len_mean`: The average length of the responses tokens.
1. `tokens/responses_len_std`: The standard deviation of the length of the responses tokens.
1. `tokens/responses_dist`: The histogram distribution of the length of the responses tokens. (Costa: inconsistent naming, should be `tokens/responses_len_dist`)
1. `objective/logprobs`: The histogram distribution of the log probabilities of the actions taken by the model.
1. `objective/ref_logprobs`: The histogram distribution of the log probabilities of the actions taken by the reference model.
### Crucial values
During training, many values are logged, here are the most important ones:
1. `env/reward_mean`,`env/reward_std`, `env/reward_dist`: the properties of the reward distribution from the "environment" / reward model
1. `ppo/mean_non_score_reward`: The mean negated KL penalty during training (shows the delta between the reference model and the new policy over the batch in the step)
Here are some parameters that are useful to monitor for stability (when these diverge or collapse to 0, try tuning variables):
1. `ppo/loss/value`: it will spike / NaN when not going well.
1. `ppo/policy/ratio`: `ratio` being 1 is a baseline value, meaning that the probability of sampling a token is the same under the new and old policy. If the ratio is too high like 200, it means the probability of sampling a token is 200 times higher under the new policy than the old policy. This is a sign that the new policy is too different from the old policy, which will likely cause overoptimization and collapse training later on.
1. `ppo/policy/clipfrac` and `ppo/policy/approxkl`: if `ratio` is too high, the `ratio` is going to get clipped, resulting in high `clipfrac` and high `approxkl` as well.
1. `objective/kl`: it should stay positive so that the policy is not too far away from the reference policy.
1. `objective/kl_coef`: The target coefficient with [`AdaptiveKLController`]. Often increases before numerical instabilities.
Recent research from the team at [Thinking Machines Lab](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/lora/) (Schulman et al., 2025) shows that **LoRA can match full fine-tuning performance** when configured correctly, while using only ~67% of the compute. These findings are exciting to TRL users because they're straightforward to implement and can improve model performance on smaller budgets.
This guide provides simple instructions to reproduce the results of the blog post in TRL.
> [!TIP]
> It is recommended to read the blog post before following this guide, or to consult both resources in parallel for best results.
## Benefits of LoRA over full fine-tuning
First of all, let's remind ourselves of the benefits of [LoRA over full fine-tuning](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/en/peft_integration).
LoRA adds adapter layers on top of the base model, which contains significantly fewer parameters than the base model itself. This design reduces GPU memory requirements and enables more efficient training. As described in the [blog](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/lora/), this approach was originally thought to involve a performance trade-off, although careful configuration can overcome this trade-off and match full fine-tuning performance.
## Examples with TRL
Let's implement and train LoRA adapters in TRL scripts based on the core findings of the blog post. Afterwards, we'll revisit each finding in light of the TRL results.
### Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
The blog post performs SFT on a range of models and datasets from the Hub, which we can reproduce in TRL.
To use Hugging Face Jobs, you will need to be logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`) and have a [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan. Check out the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/en/guides/jobs) for more details.
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="local">
```bash
uv run "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/main/trl/scripts/sft.py"\
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct \
--dataset_name open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k \
--learning_rate 2.0e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 1\
--packing \
--per_device_train_batch_size 2\
--gradient_accumulation_steps 16\
--gradient_checkpointing \
--eval_strategy no \
--use_peft \
--lora_r 256\
--lora_alpha 16\
--lora_target_modules all-linear \
--output_dir Qwen2.5-3B-OpenThoughts-LoRA \
--report_to trackio \
--push_to_hub
```
To run the script locally, you will need to have `uv` installed. Check out the [uv documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) for more details.
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
Once training starts, you can monitor the progress in [Trackio](https://huggingface.co/trackio), which will log the URL.
### Reinforcement Learning (GRPO)
The blog post performs GRPO on a range of models and datasets from the Hub, and once again we can reproduce the results in TRL.
To use Hugging Face Jobs, you will need to be logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`) and have a [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan. Check out the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/en/guides/jobs) for more details.
</hfoption>
<hfoptionid="local">
```bash
uv run "https://huggingface.co/datasets/burtenshaw/lora-without-regrets/resolve/main/grpo.py"\
To run the script locally, you will need to have `uv` installed. Check out the [uv documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) for more details.
</hfoption>
</hfoptions>
The reinforcement learning script with GRPO is implemented as a custom script in TRL, which uses the reward function shown above. You can review it at [`grpo.py`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/burtenshaw/lora-without-regrets/blob/main/grpo.py) - Reinforcement learning with LoRA best practices
## Key findings in optimizing LoRA
The authors recommend applying LoRA to all weight matrices rather than limiting it to attention layers, as increasing the rank does not compensate for this restriction. In TRL, this can be configured using `--lora_target_modules all-linear` to apply LoRA to all weight matrices.
We were able to reproduce the results of the blog post using TRL and the SmolLM3 model. We trained the model for 500 steps on the [Math 220k dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified) with the reward function and configuration above. As you can see in the figure below, the LoRA model's average train reward curve matches the full fine-tuning curve.
Let's break down the key findings of the blog post and how we were able to reproduce them.
### 1. *LoRA performs better when applied to all weight matrices*
The authors recommend applying LoRA to all weight matrices rather than limiting it to attention layers, as increasing the rank does not compensate for this restriction.
Attention-only LoRA underperforms even when using a higher rank to match parameter count. In TRL, this can be configured using `--lora_target_modules all-linear` to apply LoRA to all weight matrices. In Python, we can do this like so:
### 2. *The adapter needs sufficient capacity to learn from the dataset*
The blog post recommends using a sufficient LoRA rank to learn from the dataset. The rank determines the number of trainable parameters in the LoRA adapter. Therefore, "For datasets that exceed LoRA capacity, LoRA underperforms FullFT".
In the TRL script, we could use `--lora_r` to set the rank and adapt it based on the task and dataset we're training on. The blog post recommends the following ranks based on the task and dataset size:
Reinforcement learning tasks typically require lower capacity, so smaller LoRA ranks can be used. This is because policy gradient algorithms extract roughly ~1 bit of information per episode, demanding minimal parameter capacity.
The blog post defines the ideal dataset size for LoRA to match full fine-tuning as "Post-training scale". Which we can use to determine the recommended rank for SFT and RL LoRAs as:
| Task Type | Dataset Size | Recommended Rank |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **SFT** | Post-training scale | 256 |
| **RL** | Any size | 1-32 |
### 3. *"FullFT and high-rank LoRAs have similar learning curves"*
Counterintuitively, the blog post recommends using a higher learning rate than for full fine-tuning. In the table above, we used 1.0e-5 for LoRA and 1.0e-6 for full fine-tuning. In the TRL script, we could use `--learning_rate` to set the learning rate. The \\( \frac{1}{r} \\) scaling in LoRA makes the optimal learning rate approximately rank-independent.
### 4. *"In some scenarios, LoRA is less tolerant of large batch sizes than full fine-tuning."*
The blog post recommends using an effective batch size <32becausetheauthorsfoundLoRAtobelesstolerantoflargebatchsizes.ThiscouldnotbemitigatedbyincreasingtheLoRArank.IntheTRLscript,wecoulduse`--per_device_train_batch_size`and`--gradient_accumulation_steps`tosetthebatchsize.
# Multi Adapter RL (MARL) - a single base model for everything
Here we present an approach that uses a single base model for the entire PPO algorithm - which includes retrieving the reference logits, computing the active logits and the rewards. This feature is experimental as we did not test the convergence of the approach. We encourage the community to let us know if they potentially face issues.
## Requirements
You just need to install `peft` and optionally install `bitsandbytes` as well if you want to go for 8bit base models, for more memory efficient finetuning.
## Summary
You need to address this approach in three stages that we summarize as follows:
1- Train a base model on the target domain (e.g. `imdb` dataset) - this is the Supervised Fine Tuning stage - it can leverage the `SFTTrainer` from TRL.
2- Train a reward model using `peft`. This is required in order to re-use the adapter during the RL optimisation process (step 3 below). We show an example of leveraging the `RewardTrainer` from TRL in [this example](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py)
3- Fine tune new adapters on the base model using PPO and the reward adapter. ("0 abstraction RL")
Make sure to use the same model (i.e. same architecture and same weights) for the stages 2 & 3.
## Quickstart
Let us assume you have trained your reward adapter on `llama-7b` model using `RewardTrainer` and pushed the weights on the hub under `trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter`.
When doing PPO, before passing the model to `PPOTrainer` create your model as follows:
```python
model_name = "huggyllama/llama-7b"
rm_adapter_id = "trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter"
# PPO adapter
lora_config = LoraConfig(
r=16,
lora_alpha=32,
lora_dropout=0.05,
bias="none",
task_type="CAUSAL_LM",
)
model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
model_name,
peft_config=lora_config,
reward_adapter=rm_adapter_id,
)
...
trainer = PPOTrainer(
model=model,
...
)
...
```
Then inside your PPO training loop, call the `compute_reward_score` method by accessing the `model` attribute from `PPOTrainer`.
If you are familiar with the `peft` library, you know that you can use multiple adapters inside the same model. What you can do is train multiple adapters on the same base model to fine-tune on different policies.
In this case, you want to be able to control the adapter name you want to activate back, after retrieving the reward. For that, simply pass the appropriate `adapter_name` to `ppo_adapter_name` argument when calling `compute_reward_score`.
For more memory efficient fine-tuning, you can load your base model in 8-bit or 4-bit while keeping the adapters in the default precision (float32).
Just pass the appropriate arguments (i.e. `load_in_8bit=True` or `load_in_4bit=True`) to `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained` as follows (assuming you have installed `bitsandbytes`):
```python
model_name = "llama-7b"
rm_adapter_id = "trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter"
# PPO adapter
lora_config = LoraConfig(
r=16,
lora_alpha=32,
lora_dropout=0.05,
bias="none",
task_type="CAUSAL_LM",
)
model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
Nash-MD was proposed in the paper [Nash Learning from Human Feedback](https://huggingface.co/papers/2312.00886) by Rémi Munos, [Michal Valko](https://huggingface.co/misovalko), Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Daniel Guo, Yunhao Tang, Matthieu Geist, Thomas Mésnard, and Andrea Michi.
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the main paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, RLHF involves the initial step of learning a reward model from human feedback, often expressed as preferences between pairs of text generations produced by a pre-trained LLM. Subsequently, the LLM's policy is fine-tuned by optimizing it to maximize the reward model through a reinforcement learning algorithm. However, an inherent limitation of current reward models is their inability to fully represent the richness of human preferences and their dependency on the sampling distribution. In this study, we introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of LLMs using pairwise human feedback. Our approach entails the initial learning of a preference model, which is conditioned on two inputs given a prompt, followed by the pursuit of a policy that consistently generates responses preferred over those generated by any competing policy, thus defining the Nash equilibrium of this preference model. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF). In the context of a tabular policy representation, we present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent. This algorithm produces a sequence of policies, with the last iteration converging to the regularized Nash equilibrium. Additionally, we explore parametric representations of policies and introduce gradient descent algorithms for deep-learning architectures. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present experimental results involving the fine-tuning of a LLM for a text summarization task. We believe NLHF offers a compelling avenue for preference learning and policy optimization with the potential of advancing the field of aligning LLMs with human preferences.
This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif) and [Daniil Tiapkin](https://huggingface.co/dtiapkin), [Pierre Ménard](https://huggingface.co/menardprr), Daniele Calandriello and [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec).
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the Nash-MD method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model and [`PairRMJudge`] as a judge. We use the prompts from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the prompts in the dataset here:
Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 3 hours.
To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-NashMD) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
The best programming language depends on personal preference, the complexity of the project, and the specific requirements of the task. Some programming languages that are often recommended include Python, Java, and JavaScript, and there are many other languages to choose from depending on individual needs.
</code></pre>
## Expected dataset type
Nash-MD requires a [prompt-only dataset](dataset_formats#prompt-only). The [`NashMDTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
## Usage tips
### Use a reward model
Instead of a judge, you can chose to use a reward model -- see [Reward Bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/allenai/reward-bench) for a leaderboard of public models you can use. Below is a code example showing how to replace a judge with the [trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward) model:
```diff
- from trl import PairRMJudge
+ from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
> Make sure that the SFT model and reward model use the _same_ chat template and the same tokenizer. Otherwise, you may find the model completions are scored incorrectly during training.
### Encourage EOS token generation
We may want the model to generate completions within a given length. During training, the model will generate completions up to the maximum length specified in the `max_new_tokens` argument of [`NashMDConfig`]. If you want to penalize the model for not generating an EOS token before reaching the maximum length, you can use the `missing_eos_penalty` argument of [`NashMDConfig`]:
We provide an example script to train a model using the Nash-MD method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/nash_md.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/nash_md.py)
To test the online DPO script with the [Qwen2.5 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback), run the following command:
```bash
python examples/scripts/nash_md.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
--judge pair_rm \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt \
--learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
--output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-NashMD-PairRM \
--warmup_ratio 0.1 \
--push_to_hub
```
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
*`loss/kl`: The mean KL divergence between the model and reference data.
*`objective/entropy`: The mean entropy of the model and reference data.
*`loss/score`: The mean reinforce score loss.
*`rewards/chosen`: The mean scores (according to the reward model) of the model completions.
*`rewards/rejected`: The mean scores (according to the reward model) of the mixture completions.
*`rewards/probabilities`: The mean probability (according to the reward model or judge) of the model completions chosen vs the mixture completion.
*`rewards/accuracies`: The accuracies of the Nash-MD's implicit reward model.
*`rewards/margins`: The mean reward margin (according to reward model) between the chosen and mixture completions.
*`logps/chosen`: The mean log probabilities of the chosen completions.
*`logps/rejected`: The mean log probabilities of the reference completions.
*`val/model_contain_eos_token`: The amount of times the model's output contains the eos token.
*`val/ref_contain_eos_token`: The amount of times the mixture's output contains the eos token.
*`beta`: The parameter that controls the weight of the loss term representing the deviation from the reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`NashMDConfig`].
*`mixture_coef`: Logit mixture coefficient for the model and reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`NashMDConfig`].
Online DPO was proposed in [Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.04792) by Shangmin Guo, Biao Zhang, Tianlin Liu, Tianqi Liu, Misha Khalman, Felipe Llinares, Alexandre Rame, Thomas Mesnard, Yao Zhao, Bilal Piot, Johan Ferret, and Mathieu Blondel.
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> Direct alignment from preferences (DAP) methods, such as DPO, have recently emerged as efficient alternatives to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), that do not require a separate reward model. However, the preference datasets used in DAP methods are usually collected ahead of training and never updated, thus the feedback is purely offline. Moreover, responses in these datasets are often sampled from a language model distinct from the one being aligned, and since the model evolves over training, the alignment phase is inevitably off-policy. In this study, we posit that online feedback is key and improves DAP methods. Our method, online AI feedback (OAIF), uses an LLM as annotator: on each training iteration, we sample two responses from the current model and prompt the LLM annotator to choose which one is preferred, thus providing online feedback. Despite its simplicity, we demonstrate via human evaluation in several tasks that OAIF outperforms both offline DAP and RLHF methods. We further show that the feedback leveraged in OAIF is easily controllable, via instruction prompts to the LLM annotator.
This post-training method was contributed by [Michael Noukhovitch](https://huggingface.co/mnoukhov), [Shengyi Costa Huang](https://huggingface.co/vwxyzjn), [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec), and [Edward Beeching](https://huggingface.co/edbeeching).
## Quick start
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the online DPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model and [`PairRMJudge`] as a judge. We use the prompts from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the prompts in the dataset here:
Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 1 hour. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in both the reward for rejected and chosen completions indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-OnlineDPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
The best programming language depends on your specific needs and priorities. Some people prefer imperative programming languages (like Haskell or Lisp), while others prefer functional programming languages (like Scala or Python). It's important to consider your work style, programming environment, and project requirements when choosing a programming language.
</code></pre>
## Expected dataset type
Online DPO only requires a [prompt-only dataset](dataset_formats#prompt-only) (unlike offline DPO, that expects [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference)). The [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
## Usage tips
### Use a reward model
Instead of a judge, you can chose to use a reward model -- see [Reward Bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/allenai/reward-bench) for a leaderboard of public models you can use. Below is a code example showing how to replace a judge with the [trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward) model:
```diff
- from trl import PairRMJudge
+ from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
When using a reward model, we may want the model to generate completions within a given length. During training, the model will generate completions up to the maximum length specified in the `max_new_tokens` argument of [`OnlineDPOConfig`]. If you want to penalize the model for not generating an EOS token before reaching the maximum length, you can use the `missing_eos_penalty` argument of [`OnlineDPOConfig`]:
We provide an example script to train a model using the online DPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/dpo_online.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_online.py)
To test the online DPO script with the [Qwen2.5 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback), run the following command:
```bash
python examples/scripts/dpo_online.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
--judge pair_rm \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt \
--learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
--output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-Online-DPO-PairRM \
--warmup_ratio 0.1 \
--push_to_hub
```
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics. Here is an example [tracked run at Weights and Biases](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/runs/w4apmsi9)
*`objective/kl`: The mean Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the current model and reference model.
*`objective/entropy`: The mean entropy of the model, indicating the randomness of the actions chosen by the model.
*`objective/non_score_reward`: The mean reward from non-score-related sources, basically `beta * kl.sum(1)`, where `beta` is the KL penalty coefficient and `kl` is the per-token KL divergence.
*`objective/rlhf_reward`: The mean RLHF reward, which is `scores - non_score_reward`. The `rlhf_reward` is the ultimate objective of online DPO training. If training works as intended, this metric should keep going up.
*`objective/scores`: The mean scores returned by the reward model.
*`objective/scores_margin`: The mean score margin (according to the external reward model) between the chosen and rejected completions.
*`rewards/chosen`: The mean reward (according to online DPO's implicit reward model)of the chosen completions.
*`rewards/rejected`: The mean reward (according to online DPO's implicit reward model) of the rejected completions.
*`rewards/accuracies`: The accuracies of the online DPO's implicit reward model.
*`rewards/margins`: The mean reward margin (according to online DPO's implicit reward model) between the chosen and rejected completions.
*`logps/chosen`: The mean log probabilities of the chosen completions.
*`logps/rejected`: The mean log probabilities of the rejected completions.
*`val/contain_eos_token`: The fraction of completions which contain an EOS token.
*`beta`: The parameter that controls the weight of the loss term representing the deviation from the reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`OnlineDPOConfig`].
## Benchmark experiments
To validate the online DPO implementation works, we ran experiments with the Pythia 1B, 2.8B, and 6.9B models on a single node of 8 x H100s. Here are the commands we used to run the experiments. We take the SFT / RM models directly from [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.17031).
To evaluate, we use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm) to load the checkpoints and GPT-4o mini as a judge model to evaluate the generated TL;DR against the reference TL;DR.
For more information on how to use judges, see [Judges](judges).
plt.ylabel("Win rate against reference summaries\n(according to GPT-4-0613)")
plt.title("DPO scaling by model size")
plt.legend()
plt.xlim(5e8,1.2e10)
plt.xticks([1e9,3e9,1e10],["1B","3B","10B"])
plt.grid(True,which="both",ls="--",c="0.7")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
```
The online DPO checkpoint gets increasingly more win rate as we scale up the model sizes. This is a good sign that the online DPO implementation is working as intended.
# OpenEnv Integration for Training LLMs with Environments
## Overview
[OpenEnv](https://github.com/meta-pytorch/OpenEnv) is an open-source framework from Meta's PyTorch team for defining, deploying, and interacting with environments in reinforcement learning (RL) and agentic workflows. It offers [Gymnasium-style APIs](https://gymnasium.farama.org) (e.g., `reset()` and `step()`) to interface with environments in a standard manner, and supports running these environments as backend servers (for example via HTTP or containerised execution). You can find a collection of ready-to-use OpenEnv environments on the [Hugging Face Hub](https://huggingface.co/collections/openenv/environment-hub).
In this guide, we’ll focus on **how to integrate OpenEnv with TRL**, but feel free to explore the links above to dive deeper into OpenEnv itself.
## Installation
To use OpenEnv with TRL, install the framework:
```bash
pip install openenv-core
```
## Using `rollout_func` with OpenEnv environments
TRL's [`GRPOTrainer`] supports _custom rollout logic_ through the `rollout_func` argument. This lets you override the trainer's default text-generation loop and directly interact with OpenEnv environments — for instance, to compute environment-driven rewards instead of relying solely on model-based signals.
### Rollout Function Signature
A rollout function must have the following signature:
```python
defrollout_func(
prompts:list[str],
args:GRPOConfig,
processing_class
)->dict[str,list]:
"""
Custom rollout function for generation and reward computation.
processing_class: Tokenizer/processor for encoding/decoding
Returns:
Dictionary containing:
- prompt_ids: List of token IDs for each prompt
- completion_ids: List of token IDs for each completion
- logprobs: List of log probabilities for each token
- Any additional fields are forwarded to reward functions as kwargs
"""
pass
```
> [!NOTE]
> Any extra fields in the returned dictionary (beyond the required three) are automatically forwarded to your reward functions. This makes it easy to propagate signals such as environment rewards or auxiliary metrics from the rollout step.
### Integration pattern
The typical pattern when combining OpenEnv with TRL looks like this:
1. Start or connect to an OpenEnv environment (e.g., an HTTP endpoint or Dockerized env).
2. Generate completions from your model — for example, via a vLLM inference server (`use_vllm=True`, `vllm_mode="server"`).
3. Step through the environment using each completion to compute rewards or metrics.
4. Add environment results (e.g., `env_reward`) to the rollout result dict.
5. Access those rewards inside your reward function via `**kwargs`.
By using OpenEnv in this loop, you can:
* Train with realistic or interactive feedback (not just static reward functions).
* Plug in custom simulators, web APIs, or evaluators as environments.
* Pass structured reward signals back into RL training seamlessly.
## A simple example
The [echo.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/openenv/echo.py) script demonstrates a minimal, end-to-end integration between TRL and OpenEnv. In this example, the Echo environment rewards completions based on their text length, encouraging the model to generate longer outputs. This pattern can be extended to any custom environment that provides structured feedback or task-based rewards:
To learn more about how to create custom environments, see the [OpenEnv documentation](https://github.com/meta-pytorch/OpenEnv/blob/main/src/envs/README.md).
## Advanced Example
Let's level this up a bit by training a model to interact with a more complex environment. We'll use the game word guessing game [wordle](https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/index.html) from the `textarena` environment.
### The TextArena Environment
[TextArena](https://huggingface.co/papers/2504.11442) is an open-source collection of competitive text-based games designed to evaluate reasoning skills in LLMs using textual games like Wordle, Snake, Tic-Tac-Toe, and more. Research has shown that such games improve model performance on reasoning tasks.

We will use the `textarena` environment to train a model to play Wordle. The environment is a simple text based response environment that allows the model to interact with the game by making guesses and receive feedback on them.
### Wordle
Wordle is a useful game to train a model on because it requires the model to reason about the word and the feedback provided by the environment. Also, it is a purely language based game that requires no external tools or knowledge. Furthermore, we found that models from 1 billion parameters and up are able to improve on wordle and only require 8 tokens to generate a guess, which makes the game a good benchmark to experiment with Reinforcement Learning environments without significant compute requirements.
> [!NOTE] How does Wordle work?
> Wordle is a word guessing game where the player has to guess a 5-letter word. The player can make 6 guesses, and for each guess, the environment will provide feedback on the correctness of the guess. The player wins if they guess the word in 6 guesses or less. It challenges the model to generate words that are likely to be correct, and to learn from the feedback provided by the environment.
>
> For example, if the wordle environment returns the following feedback:
>
> ```
> G U E S S
> X G Y X X
> ```
> The model has guessed the word "GUESS" and the environment has provided feedback as the letters X, G, and Y. Referring to colors in the original game blank, green, and yellow. From this feedback, the model should learn that the word is "GUESS" is incorrect. The letter "E" is in the word, but in the wrong position. The letter "U" is correct and in the correct position.
In the TextArena environment, reward is only given when the model wins the game. The reward is 1.0 if the model wins, and 0.0 otherwise. This is not a very efficient reward signal for the model, so we have added a number of custom reward functions to the script to help the model learn to play the game. The extensible nature of `reward_funcs` and `rollout_func` allows you to add any custom reward function you want to the script.
### Rollout Function
The rollout function runs one full Wordle episode, prompting the model for a guess each turn and capturing both environment rewards and auxiliary signals such as letter coverage and repetition penalties.
```python
defrollout_once(
env:TextArenaEnv,
tokenizer:AutoTokenizer,
args:GRPOConfig,
dataset_prompt:str,
cli_args:argparse.Namespace,
system_prompt:str,
)->dict[str,list]:
result=env.reset()
observation=result.observation
prompt_ids:list[int]=[]
completion_ids:list[int]=[]
logprobs:list[float]=[]
raw_rewards:list[float]=[]
green_scores:list[float]=[]
yellow_scores:list[float]=[]
repetition_scores:list[float]=[]
correct_scores:list[float]=[]
guess_counts:dict[str,int]={}
for_turninrange(cli_args.max_turns):
# when the game is over the environment will return a done=True
The environment has a reward signal based on the completion of the game. We found that most models struggle to ever win the game, so we have added a number of custom reward functions to the script to help the model learn to play the game more iteratively. At first, the model will learn to cover new letters and avoid repeating guesses. As it improves, it will learn to win the game.
### Reward Functions
We log four reward streams that encourage the model to solve the puzzle, cover new letters, and avoid repeating guesses:
-`reward_correct`: final win/loss signal from the environment.
-`reward_greens`: density of green letters in the last feedback.
-`reward_yellows`: density of yellow letters in the last feedback.
-`reward_repetition`: penalty for guessing the same token multiple times.
The training script wires the custom rollout and rewards into `GRPOTrainer`. The CLI exposes the configuration used during development as defaults, so you can override endpoints or hyperparameters at launch time.
```python
parser=argparse.ArgumentParser()
# ... add CLI arguments with sensible defaults ...
The resulting model improves it's performance on the game, both by reducing the number of repetitions and by increasing the number of correct guesses. However, the the Qwen3-1.7B model we trained is not able to consistently win the game. The following reward curve shows the coverage of the model's guesses and the coverage of correct Y and G letters.
We experimented larger models like `gpt-oss-20b` and found that model was able to consistently win the game. However, this requires a lot of compute to train and the model. Why not try this out yourself?
[Odds Ratio Preference Optimization](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07691) (ORPO) by Jiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, and James Thorne studies the crucial role of SFT within the context of preference alignment. Using preference data the method posits that a minor penalty for the disfavored generation together with a strong adaption signal to the chosen response via a simple log odds ratio term appended to the NLL loss is sufficient for preference-aligned SFT.
Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) was introduced in [ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.07691) by [Jiwoo Hong](https://huggingface.co/JW17), [Noah Lee](https://huggingface.co/nlee-208), and [James Thorne](https://huggingface.co/j6mes).
The abstract from the paper is the following:
> While recent preference alignment algorithms for language models have demonstrated promising results, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) remains imperative for achieving successful convergence. In this paper, we study the crucial role of SFT within the context of preference alignment, emphasizing that a minor penalty for the disfavored generation style is sufficient for preference-aligned SFT. Building on this foundation, we introduce a straightforward and innovative reference model-free monolithic odds ratio preference optimization algorithm, ORPO, eliminating the necessity for an additional preference alignment phase. We demonstrate, both empirically and theoretically, that the odds ratio is a sensible choice for contrasting favored and disfavored styles during SFT across the diverse sizes from 125M to 7B. Specifically, fine-tuning Phi-2 (2.7B), Llama-2 (7B), and Mistral (7B) with ORPO on the UltraFeedback alone surpasses the performance of state-of-the-art language models with more than 7B and 13B parameters: achieving up to 12.20% on AlpacaEval_{2.0} (Figure 1), 66.19% on IFEval (instruction-level loose, Table 6), and 7.32 in MT-Bench (Figure 12). We release code and model checkpoints for Mistral-ORPO-alpha (7B) and Mistral-ORPO-beta (7B).
It studies the crucial role of SFT within the context of preference alignment. Using preference data the method posits that a minor penalty for the disfavored generation together with a strong adaption signal to the chosen response via a simple log odds ratio term appended to the NLL loss is sufficient for preference-aligned SFT.
Thus ORPO is a reference model-free preference optimization algorithm eliminating the necessity for an additional preference alignment phase thus saving compute and memory.
The official code can be found [xfactlab/orpo](https://github.com/xfactlab/orpo).
The official code can be found in [xfactlab/orpo](https://github.com/xfactlab/orpo).
## Expected dataset format
This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif), [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun) and [Alvaro Bartolome](https://huggingface.co/alvarobartt).
The ORPO trainer expects a format identical to the DPO trainer, which should include three entries. These entries should be named as follows:
## Quick start
-`prompt`
-`chosen`
-`rejected`
This example demonstrates how to train a model using the ORPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
where the `prompt` contains the context inputs, `chosen` contains the corresponding chosen responses and `rejected` contains the corresponding negative (rejected) responses. Note that a prompt can have multiple responses and this is reflected in the entries being repeated in the dictionary's value arrays.
Below is the script to train the model:
## Expected model format
The ORPO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/orpo.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `ORPOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train. **Note that ORPOTrainer eliminates the need to use the reference model, simplifying the optimization process.** The `beta` refers to the hyperparameter `lambda` in eq. (6) of the paper and refers to the weighting of the relative odd ratio loss in the standard cross-entropy loss used for SFT.
While training and evaluating we record the following reward metrics:
```bash
accelerate launch train_orpo.py
```
*`rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
*`rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
*`rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
*`rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 30 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
*`log_odds_chosen`: the mean log odds ratio of the chosen responses over the rejected responses
*`log_odds_ratio`: the mean of the `log(sigmoid(log_odds_chosen))`
To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
It's challenging to determine the best programming language as no one language is perfect, as the complexity of a task and the type of project are significant factors. Some popular languages include Java, Python, JavaScript, and
C++. If you have specific needs or requirements for a specific project, it's important to choose the language that best suits those needs.
Here are some other factors to consider when choosing a programming language for a project:
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Language proficiency:</span></strong> A good programming language is more likely to be easy to understand and use, and will allow developers to collaborate on projects more efficiently.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Ease of use:</span></strong> There are tools and libraries available to make programming more accessible, so developers should choose a language that can help them get started easier.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Code readability:</span></strong> A clear and concise codebase should be easy to read and understand, especially when working with large projects.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Tool and framework support:</span></strong> There are numerous libraries available for Python, Java, and JavaScript, along with tools like IDEs and static code analysis tools.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Accessibility:</span></strong> Some languages and tools have features that make them more accessible to developers with disabilities, such as support for screen readers.
<strong><spanstyle="color: green;">• Version control:</span></strong> As your projects grow and complexity increases, version control tools can be beneficial for tracking changes.
</code></pre>
## Expected dataset type
ORPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`ORPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset format. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
Although the [`ORPOTrainer`] supports both explicit and implicit prompts, we recommend using explicit prompts. If provided with an implicit prompt dataset, the trainer will automatically extract the prompt from the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` columns. For more information, refer to the [preference style](dataset_formats#preference) section.
## Example script
We provide an example script to train a model using the ORPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/orpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/orpo.py)
To test the ORPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
```bash
accelerate launch examples/scripts/orpo.py \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
--num_train_epochs 1\
--output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO
```
## Usage tips
### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.
To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).
To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
## Logged metrics
While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
-`rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
-`rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
-`rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
-`rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
-`log_odds_chosen`: the mean log odds ratio of the chosen responses over the rejected responses
-`log_odds_ratio`: the mean of the `log(sigmoid(log_odds_chosen))`
-`nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss from the SFT part of the loss over chosen responses
*`nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss from the SFT part of the loss over chosen responses
## ORPOTrainer
[[autodoc]] ORPOTrainer
- train
- save_model
- push_to_hub
## ORPOConfig
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff
Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.