Remove parsers

Co-authored-by: Albert Villanova del Moral <8515462+albertvillanova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: YonatanGideoni <yonatan.gideoni@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: burtenshaw <ben.burtenshaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: sergiopaniego <sergiopaniegoblanco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lewtun <lewis.c.tunstall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashif Rasul <kashif.rasul@gmail.com>

.claude/settings.local.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "permissions": {
+    "allow": [
+      "Bash(pytest:*)",
+      "Bash(curl:*)"
+    ],
+    "deny": []
+  }
+}

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+name: "\U0001F41B Bug Report"
+description: Submit a bug report to help us improve TRL
+labels: [ "bug" ]
+body:
+  - type: markdown
+    attributes:
+      value: |
+        Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report! 🤗
+
+        🚩 If it is your first time submitting, be sure to check our [bug report guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#did-you-find-a-bug)
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reproduction
+    validations:
+      required: true
+    attributes:
+      label: Reproduction
+      description: |
+        Please provide a code sample that reproduces the problem you ran into. It can be a Colab link or just a code snippet.
+        If you have code snippets, error messages, stack traces please provide them here as well.
+        Important! Use code tags to correctly format your code. See https://help.github.com/en/github/writing-on-github/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks#syntax-highlighting
+        Do not use screenshots, as they are hard to read and (more importantly) don't allow others to copy-and-paste your code.
+
+      value: |
+        ```python
+        from trl import ...
+
+        ```
+
+        outputs:
+
+        ```
+        Traceback (most recent call last):
+          File "example.py", line 42, in <module>
+            ...
+        ```
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: system-info
+    attributes:
+      label: System Info
+      description: |
+        Please provide information about your system: platform, Python version, PyTorch version, Transformers version, devices, TRL version, ...
+        You can get this information by running `trl env` in your terminal.
+
+      placeholder: Copy-paste the output of `trl env`
+    validations:
+      required: true
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: terms
+    attributes:
+      label: Checklist
+      description: |
+        Before submitting, please confirm that you've completed each of the following.
+        If an item doesn't apply to your issue, check it anyway to show you've reviewed it.
+      options:
+        - label: "I have checked that my issue isn't already filed (see [open issues](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues?q=is%3Aissue))"
+          required: true
+        - label: "I have included my system information"
+          required: true
+        - label: "Any code provided is minimal, complete, and reproducible ([more on MREs](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks))"
+          required: true
+        - label: "Any code provided is properly formatted in code blocks, (no screenshot, [more on code blocks](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks))"
+          required: true
+        - label: "Any traceback provided is complete"
+          required: true

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+name: "\U0001F680 Feature request"
+description: Submit a proposal/request for a new TRL feature
+labels: [ "Feature request" ]
+body:
+  - type: textarea
+    id: feature-request
+    validations:
+      required: true
+    attributes:
+      label: Feature request
+      description: |
+        A clear and concise description of the feature proposal. Please provide a link to the paper and code in case they exist.
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: motivation
+    validations:
+      required: true
+    attributes:
+      label: Motivation
+      description: |
+        Please outline the motivation for the proposal. Is your feature request related to a problem? e.g., I'm always frustrated when [...]. If this is related to another GitHub issue, please link here too.
+
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: contribution
+    validations:
+      required: true
+    attributes:
+      label: Your contribution
+      description: |
+        Is there any way that you could help, e.g. by submitting a PR? Make sure to read the CONTRIBUTING.MD [readme](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/new-trainer-addition.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+name: "\U0001F31F New trainer addition"
+description: Submit a proposal/request to implement a new trainer for a post-training method 
+labels: [ "New trainer" ]
+
+body:
+  - type: textarea
+    id: description-request
+    validations:
+      required: true
+    attributes:
+      label: Method description
+      description: |
+        Put any and all important information relative to the method
+
+  - type: checkboxes
+    id: information-tasks
+    attributes:
+      label: Open source status
+      description: |
+          Please note that if the method implementation isn't available or model weights with training datasets aren't available, we are less likely to implement it in `trl`.
+      options:
+        - label: "The method implementation is available"
+        - label: "The model weights are available"
+        - label: "The training datasets are available"
+
+  - type: textarea
+    id: additional-info
+    attributes:
+      label: Provide useful links for the implementation
+      description: |
+        Please provide information regarding the implementation, the weights, and the authors.
+        Please mention the authors by @gh-username if you're aware of their usernames.

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# What does this PR do?
+
+<!--
+Congratulations! You've made it this far! You're not quite done yet though.
+
+Once merged, your PR is going to appear in the release notes with the title you set, so make sure it's a great title that fully reflects the extent of your awesome contribution.
+
+Then, please replace this with a description of the change and which issue is fixed (if applicable). Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies (if any) that are required for this change.
+
+Once you're done, someone will review your PR shortly. They may suggest changes to make the code even better.
+-->
+
+<!-- Remove if not applicable -->
+
+Fixes # (issue)
+
+
+## Before submitting
+- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
+- [ ] Did you read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#create-a-pull-request),
+      Pull Request section?
+- [ ] Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? Please add a link
+      to it if that's the case.
+- [ ] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
+- [ ] Did you write any new necessary tests?
+
+
+## Who can review?
+
+Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
+members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

.github/codeql/custom-queries.qls

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+import codeql
+
+from WorkflowString interpolation, Workflow workflow
+where 
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.issue.title }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.issue.body }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.pull_request.title }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.pull_request.body }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.review.body }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.comment.body }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.inputs.* }}") or
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.head_commit.message }}")
+  interpolation.getStringValue().matches("${{ github.event.* }}") and
+  (
+    step.getKey() = "run" or  // Injection in run
+    step.getKey() = "env" or  // Injection via env
+    step.getKey() = "with"    // Injection via with
+  )
+select workflow, "🚨 Do not use directly as input of action"

.github/workflows/benchmark.yml

@@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
-name: "Benchmark on Comment"
-
-# https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
-on:
-  issue_comment:
-    types: [created]
-
-jobs:
-  Benchmark:
-    strategy:
-      fail-fast: true
-      matrix:
-        python-version: [3.9]
-        os: [self-hosted]
-
-    name: Benchmark
-    # Only run if it#s a PR and the comment contains /Benchmark
-    if: github.event.issue.pull_request && startsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/benchmark-trl-experiments') && contains(FromJSON('["vwxyzjn", "younesbelkada", "lvwerra", "lewtun"]'), github.actor)
-    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
-
-    steps:
-      - name: Get branch of PR
-        uses: xt0rted/pull-request-comment-branch@v1
-        id: comment-branch
-      - name: Set latest commit status as pending
-        uses: myrotvorets/set-commit-status-action@master
-        with:
-          sha: ${{ steps.comment-branch.outputs.head_sha }}
-          token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-          status: pending
-      - name: Checkout `main` branch
-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
-      - name: Checkout PR branch
-        run: gh pr checkout $PR_NUMBER
-        env:
-          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
-      - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
-        with:
-          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-      # - name: Cleanup pip packages (specific to self-hosted runners)
-      #   run: |
-      #     echo PATH is $PATH
-      #     echo PYTHONPATH is $PYTHONPATH
-      #     echo which python is $(which python)
-      #     echo which pip is $(which pip)
-
-      #     pip_list=$(pip list --format=freeze | grep -v "^pip==" | grep -v "^setuptools==")
-      #     if [ ! -z "$pip_list" ]; then
-      #         echo "$pip_list" | xargs pip uninstall -y
-      #     fi
-      - name: Print python depdenencies
-        run: pip list --format=freeze
-      - name: Install dependencies
-        run: |
-          pip install .[test,benchmark]
-
-      - name: Login
-        run: wandb login ${{ secrets.WANDB_API_KEY }} && huggingface-cli login --token ${{ secrets.HUGGING_FACE_HUB_TOKEN }}
-      - name: Run benchmark
-        env:
-          GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
-          PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN_GITHUB: ${{ secrets.PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN_GITHUB }}
-        run: |
-          COMMENT="${{ github.event.comment.body }}"
-          if [[ "$COMMENT" == *"/benchmark-trl-experiments benchmark/benchmark_level1.sh"* ]]; then
-            echo "Running benchmark/benchmark_level1.sh"
-            BENCHMARK_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level1.sh" BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level1_plot.sh" bash benchmark/benchmark_and_report.sh
-          elif [[ "$COMMENT" == *"/benchmark-trl-experiments benchmark/benchmark_level2.sh"* ]]; then
-            echo "Running benchmark/benchmark_level2.sh"
-            BENCHMARK_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level2.sh" BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level2_plot.sh" bash benchmark/benchmark_and_report.sh
-          elif [[ "$COMMENT" == *"/benchmark-trl-experiments benchmark/benchmark_level3.sh"* ]]; then
-            echo "Running benchmark/benchmark_level3.sh"
-            BENCHMARK_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level3.sh" BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT="benchmark/benchmark_level3_plot.sh" bash benchmark/benchmark_and_report.sh
-          else
-            echo "Invalid command in comment. Skipping execution."
-          fi
-
-      # send message to PR
-      - name: Setup Node.js 16
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
-        with:
-          node-version: 16
-      - name: Add workflow result as comment on PR
-        uses: actions/github-script@v6
-        if: always()
-        with:
-          script: |
-            const name = '${{ github.workflow	}}';
-            const url = '${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}';
-            const success = '${{ job.status }}' === 'success';
-            const body = `${name}: ${success ? 'succeeded ✅' : 'failed ❌'}\n${url}`;
-
-            await github.rest.issues.createComment({
-              issue_number: context.issue.number,
-              owner: context.repo.owner,
-              repo: context.repo.repo,
-              body: body
-            })
-      - name: Set latest commit status as ${{ job.status }}
-        uses: myrotvorets/set-commit-status-action@master
-        if: always()
-        with:
-          sha: ${{ steps.comment-branch.outputs.head_sha }}
-          token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-          status: ${{ job.status }}

.github/workflows/build_pr_documentation.yml

@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ concurrency:
 
 jobs:
   build:
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
     uses: huggingface/doc-builder/.github/workflows/build_pr_documentation.yml@main
     with:
       commit_sha: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
       pr_number: ${{ github.event.number }}
       package: trl
-      version_tag_suffix: ""
+      version_tag_suffix: ""

.github/workflows/clear_cache.yml

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ jobs:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     steps:
       - name: Check out code
-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
         
       - name: Cleanup
         run: |

.github/workflows/codeQL.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+name: "CodeQL Analysis - Workflows"
+
+on:
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+jobs:
+  analyze:
+    name: "Analyze GitHub Workflows"
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      security-events: write
+      actions: read
+      contents: read
+
+    steps:
+      - name: "Checkout repository"
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: "Initialize CodeQL"
+        uses: github/codeql-action/init@v2
+        with:
+          languages: "yaml"
+          queries: +security-and-quality, ./.github/codeql/custom-queries.qls
+
+      - name: "Perform CodeQL Analysis"
+        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v2

.github/workflows/docker-build.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+name: Build TRL Docker image
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+concurrency:
+  group: docker-image-builds
+  cancel-in-progress: false
+
+jobs:
+  trl:
+    name: "Build and push TRL Docker image"
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Get TRL version from PyPI
+        run: |
+          VERSION=$(curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/trl/json | jq -r .info.version)
+          echo "VERSION=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+
+      - name: Set up Docker Buildx
+        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+
+      - name: Login to DockerHub
+        uses: docker/login-action@v3
+        with:
+          username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}
+          password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_PASSWORD }}
+
+      - name: Build and Push
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@v4
+        with:
+          context: docker/trl
+          push: true
+          tags: |
+            huggingface/trl:${{ env.VERSION }}
+            huggingface/trl
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: always()
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ secrets.CI_DOCKER_CHANNEL }}
+          title: 🤗 Results of the TRL Dev Docker Image build
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
+
+  trl-dev:
+    name: "Build and push TRL Dev Docker image"
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Set up Docker Buildx
+        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+
+      - name: Login to DockerHub
+        uses: docker/login-action@v3
+        with:
+          username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}
+          password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_PASSWORD }}
+
+      - name: Build and Push
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@v4
+        with:
+          context: docker/trl-dev
+          push: true
+          tags: |
+            huggingface/trl:dev
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: always()
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ secrets.CI_DOCKER_CHANNEL }}
+          title: 🤗 Results of the TRL Dev Docker Image build
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}

.github/workflows/issue_auto_labeller.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+name: "Hugging Face Issue Labeler"
+on:
+  issues:
+    types: opened
+
+jobs:
+  triage:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      issues: write
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+      - uses: August-murr/auto-labeler@main
+        with:
+            hf-api-key: ${{ secrets.CI_HF_API_TOKEN }}

.github/workflows/pr_style_bot.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+name: PR Style Bot
+
+on:
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+
+permissions:
+  contents: write
+  pull-requests: write
+
+jobs:
+  run-style-bot:
+    if: >
+      contains(github.event.comment.body, '@bot /style') &&
+      github.event.issue.pull_request != null
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+    steps:
+      - name: Extract PR details
+        id: pr_info
+        uses: actions/github-script@v6
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const prNumber = context.payload.issue.number;
+            const { data: pr } = await github.rest.pulls.get({
+              owner: context.repo.owner,
+              repo: context.repo.repo,
+              pull_number: prNumber
+            });
+            
+            // We capture both the branch ref and the "full_name" of the head repo
+            // so that we can check out the correct repository & branch (including forks).
+            core.setOutput("prNumber", prNumber);
+            core.setOutput("headRef", pr.head.ref);
+            core.setOutput("headRepoFullName", pr.head.repo.full_name);
+
+      - name: Check out PR branch
+        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        env: 
+          HEADREPOFULLNAME: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRepoFullName }}
+          HEADREF: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRef }}
+        with:
+          # Instead of checking out the base repo, use the contributor's repo name
+          repository: ${{ env.HEADREPOFULLNAME }}
+          ref: ${{ env.HEADREF }}
+          # You may need fetch-depth: 0 for being able to push
+          fetch-depth: 0
+          token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+      
+      - name: Debug
+        env: 
+          HEADREPOFULLNAME: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRepoFullName }}
+          HEADREF: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRef }}
+          PRNUMBER: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.prNumber }}
+        run: |
+          echo "PR number: ${{ env.PRNUMBER }}"
+          echo "Head Ref: ${{ env.HEADREF }}"
+          echo "Head Repo Full Name: ${{ env.HEADREPOFULLNAME }}"
+
+      - name: Set up Python
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          pip install ruff pre-commit
+
+      - name: Download Makefile from main branch
+        run: |
+          curl -o main_Makefile https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/main/Makefile
+        
+      - name: Compare Makefiles
+        run: |
+          if ! diff -q main_Makefile Makefile; then
+            echo "Error: The Makefile has changed. Please ensure it matches the main branch."
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          echo "No changes in Makefile. Proceeding..."
+          rm -rf main_Makefile
+
+      - name: Run make style and make quality
+        run: |
+          make precommit || true
+
+      - name: Commit and push changes
+        id: commit_and_push
+        env: 
+          HEADREPOFULLNAME: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRepoFullName }}
+          HEADREF: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.headRef }}
+          PRNUMBER: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.prNumber }}
+          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+        run: |
+          echo "HEADREPOFULLNAME: ${{ env.HEADREPOFULLNAME }}, HEADREF: ${{ env.HEADREF }}"
+          # Configure git with the Actions bot user
+          git config user.name "github-actions[bot]"
+          git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
+
+          # Make sure your 'origin' remote is set to the contributor's fork
+          git remote set-url origin "https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ env.HEADREPOFULLNAME }}.git"
+
+          # If there are changes after running style/quality, commit them
+          if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain)" ]; then
+            git add .
+            git commit -m "Apply style fixes"
+            # Push to the original contributor's forked branch
+            git push origin HEAD:${{ env.HEADREF }}
+            echo "changes_pushed=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          else
+            echo "No changes to commit."
+            echo "changes_pushed=false" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          fi
+
+      - name: Comment on PR with workflow run link
+        if: steps.commit_and_push.outputs.changes_pushed == 'true'
+        uses: actions/github-script@v6
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const prNumber = parseInt(process.env.prNumber, 10);
+            const runUrl = `${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/runs/${process.env.GITHUB_RUN_ID}`
+
+            await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+              owner: context.repo.owner,
+              repo: context.repo.repo,
+              issue_number: prNumber,
+              body: `Style fixes have been applied. [View the workflow run here](${runUrl}).`
+            });
+        env:
+          prNumber: ${{ steps.pr_info.outputs.prNumber }}

.github/workflows/publish.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+name: Publish to PyPI
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+      - v*-release
+    paths:
+      - "VERSION"
+
+jobs:
+  publish:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Read version
+        id: get_version
+        run: echo "version=$(cat VERSION)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+
+      - name: Debug - Show version.txt content
+        run: echo "Version is ${{ steps.get_version.outputs.version }}"
+
+      - name: Set up Python
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+        with:
+          python-version: "3.x"
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          python -m pip install --upgrade pip
+          pip install build twine
+
+      - name: Build package
+        run: python -m build
+
+      - name: Publish to PyPI
+        if: ${{ !contains(steps.get_version.outputs.version, 'dev') }}
+        env:
+          TWINE_USERNAME: __token__
+          TWINE_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.PYPI_TOKEN }}
+        run: |
+          python -m twine upload dist/*

.github/workflows/slow-tests.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+name: Slow tests (on push)
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+    paths:
+      # Run only when python files are modified
+      - "trl/**.py"
+      - "examples/**.py"
+env:
+  RUN_SLOW: "yes"
+  IS_GITHUB_CI: "1"
+  SLACK_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
+
+jobs:
+  run_all_tests_single_gpu:
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    env:
+      CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES: "0"
+      TEST_TYPE: "single_gpu"
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all --shm-size "16gb"
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    steps:
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Install system dependencies
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+          uv pip install pytest-reportlog parameterized
+
+      - name: Run slow SFT tests on single GPU
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make slow_tests
+
+      - name: Generate Report
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install slack_sdk tabulate
+          python scripts/log_reports.py >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
+
+  run_all_tests_multi_gpu:
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    env:
+      CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES: "0,1"
+      TEST_TYPE: "multi_gpu"
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all --shm-size "16gb"
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    steps:
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Install system dependencies
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+          uv pip install pytest-reportlog parameterized
+
+      - name: Run slow SFT tests on Multi GPU
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make slow_tests
+
+      - name: Generate Reports
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install slack_sdk tabulate
+          python scripts/log_reports.py >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
+          rm *.txt

.github/workflows/stale.yml

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-name: Stale Bot
-
-on:
-  schedule:
-    - cron: "0 15 * * *"
-
-jobs:
-  close_stale_issues:
-    name: Close Stale Issues
-    if: github.repository == 'huggingface/trl'
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    env:
-      GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-    steps:
-    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
-
-    - name: Setup Python
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v4
-      with:
-        python-version: 3.8
-
-    - name: Install requirements
-      run: |
-        pip install PyGithub
-    - name: Close stale issues
-      run: |
-        python scripts/stale.py

.github/workflows/tests.yml

@@ -1,75 +1,253 @@
-name: tests
+name: Tests
 
 on:
   push:
     branches: [ main ]
   pull_request:
-    branches: [ main ]
+    paths:
+      # Run only when relevant files are modified
+      - ".github/**.yml"
+      - "examples/**.py"
+      - "scripts/**.py"
+      - "tests/**.py"
+      - "trl/**.py"
+      - "pyproject.toml"
+
+env:
+  TQDM_DISABLE: 1
+  CI_SLACK_CHANNEL: ${{ secrets.CI_PUSH_MAIN_CHANNEL }}
+  PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF: "expandable_segments:True"
 
 jobs:
   check_code_quality:
+    name: Check code quality
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    strategy:
-      matrix:
-        python-version: [3.9]
-
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
     steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - name: Set up Python 3.12
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
         with:
-          fetch-depth: 0
-          submodules: recursive
-      - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-        uses: actions/setup-python@v2
-        with:
-          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-      - uses: pre-commit/action@v2.0.3
+          python-version: 3.12
+      - uses: pre-commit/action@v3.0.1
         with:
           extra_args: --all-files
 
   tests:
-    needs: check_code_quality
+    name: Tests
     strategy:
       matrix:
-        python-version: ['3.8', '3.9', '3.10']
-        os: ['ubuntu-latest', 'windows-latest']
-    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
+        python-version: ['3.9', '3.10', '3.11', '3.12', '3.13']
+      fail-fast: false
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
     steps:
-    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
-    - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v4
-      with:
-        python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-        cache: "pip"
-        cache-dependency-path: |
-            setup.py
-            requirements.txt
-    - name: Install dependencies
-      run: |
-        python -m pip install --upgrade pip
-        # cpu version of pytorch
-        pip install -e ".[test, peft, diffusers]"
-    - name: Test with pytest
-      run: |
-        make test
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
 
-  tests_no_optional_dep:
-    needs: check_code_quality
-    runs-on: 'ubuntu-latest'
+      - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
+
+      - name: Install Make and Git
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+
+      - name: Test with pytest
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make test
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && always()  # Check if the branch is main
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ env.CI_SLACK_CHANNEL }}
+          title: Results with Python ${{ matrix.python-version }} and latest dependencies
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
+
+  tests_dev:
+    name: Tests with dev dependencies
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
     steps:
-    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
-    - name: Set up Python 3.9
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v4
-      with:
-        python-version: '3.9'
-        cache: "pip"
-        cache-dependency-path: |
-            setup.py
-            requirements.txt
-    - name: Install dependencies
-      run: |
-        python -m pip install --upgrade pip
-        # cpu version of pytorch
-        pip install .[test]
-    - name: Test with pytest
-      run: |
-        make test
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Set up Python 3.12
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.12'
+
+      - name: Install Make and Git
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate.git
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/datasets.git
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/peft.git
+
+      - name: Test with pytest
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make test
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && always()  # Check if the branch is main
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ env.CI_SLACK_CHANNEL }}
+          title: Results with Python 3.12 and dev dependencies
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
+
+  tests_wo_optional_deps:
+    name: Tests without optional dependencies
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
+    steps:
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Set up Python 3.12
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.12'
+
+      - name: Install Make and Git
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[test]"
+
+      - name: Test with pytest
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make test
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && always()  # Check if the branch is main
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ env.CI_SLACK_CHANNEL }}
+          title: Results with Python 3.12 without optional dependencies
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
+
+  tests_min_versions:
+    name: Tests with minimum versions
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
+    steps:
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Set up Python 3.12
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.12'
+
+      - name: Install Make and Git
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+          uv pip install accelerate==1.4.0
+          uv pip install datasets==3.0.0
+          uv pip install transformers==4.56.1
+
+      - name: Test with pytest
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make test
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && always()  # Check if the branch is main
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ env.CI_SLACK_CHANNEL }}
+          title: Results with Python 3.12 and minimum dependencies versions
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}

.github/workflows/tests_latest.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+name: Tests latest TRL release with dev dependencies
+
+on:
+  schedule:
+    - cron: '0 0 * * *'  # Runs daily at midnight UTC
+
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+env:
+  TQDM_DISABLE: 1
+  CI_SLACK_CHANNEL: ${{ secrets.CI_PUSH_MAIN_CHANNEL }}
+
+jobs:
+  tests:
+    name: Tests latest TRL release with dev dependencies
+    runs-on:
+      group: aws-g4dn-2xlarge
+    container:
+      image: pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-devel
+      options: --gpus all
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    steps:
+      - name: Git checkout
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        with: { ref: v0.24-release }
+
+      - name: Set up Python 3.12
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.12'
+
+      - name: Install Make and Git
+        run: |
+          apt-get update && apt-get install -y make git curl
+
+      - name: Install uv
+        run: |
+          curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
+
+      - name: Create Python virtual environment
+        run: |
+          uv venv
+          uv pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          uv pip install ".[dev]"
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate.git
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/datasets.git
+          uv pip install -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
+
+      - name: Test with pytest
+        run: |
+          source .venv/bin/activate
+          make test
+
+      - name: Post to Slack
+        uses: huggingface/hf-workflows/.github/actions/post-slack@main
+        with:
+          slack_channel: ${{ env.CI_SLACK_CHANNEL }}
+          title: Results of latest TRL with Python 3.12 and dev dependencies
+          status: ${{ job.status }}
+          slack_token: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CIFEEDBACK_BOT_TOKEN }}

.github/workflows/trufflehog.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+on:
+  push:
+
+name: Secret Leaks
+
+jobs:
+  trufflehog:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+    - name: Checkout code
+      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      with:
+        fetch-depth: 0
+    - name: Secret Scanning
+      uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@853e1e8d249fd1e29d0fcc7280d29b03df3d643d
+      with:
+        # exclude buggy postgres detector that is causing false positives and not relevant to our codebase
+        extra_args: --results=verified,unknown --exclude-detectors=postgres

.gitignore

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-benchmark/trl
 *.bak
 .gitattributes
 .last_checked

.pre-commit-config.yaml

@@ -1,37 +1,12 @@
 repos:
-  - repo: https://github.com/PyCQA/isort
-    rev: 5.12.0
+  - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit
+    rev: v0.11.10
     hooks:
-      - id: isort
-        args:
-          - --profile=black
-          - --skip-glob=wandb/**/*
-          - --thirdparty=wandb
-  - repo: https://github.com/myint/autoflake
-    rev: v1.4
-    hooks:
-      - id: autoflake
-        args:
-          - -r
-          - --exclude=wandb,__init__.py
-          - --in-place
-          - --remove-unused-variables
-          - --remove-all-unused-imports
-  - repo: https://github.com/python/black
-    rev: 22.3.0
-    hooks:
-      - id: black
-        args:
-          - --line-length=119
-          - --target-version=py38
-          - --exclude=wandb
-  - repo: https://github.com/pycqa/flake8
-    rev: 6.0.0
-    hooks:
-      - id: flake8
-        args:
-          - --ignore=E203,E501,W503,E128
-          - --max-line-length=119
+      - id: ruff-check
+        types_or: [ python, pyi ]
+        args: [ --fix ]
+      - id: ruff-format
+        types_or: [ python, pyi ]
 
   # - repo: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell
   #   rev: v2.1.0

CITATION.cff

@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ authors:
     family-names: Thrush
   - given-names: Nathan
     family-names: Lambert
+  - given-names: Shengyi
+    family-names: Huang
+  - given-names: Kashif
+    family-names: Rasul
+  - given-names: Quentin
+    family-names: Gallouédec
 repository-code: 'https://github.com/huggingface/trl'
 abstract: "With trl you can train transformer language models with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The library is built on top of the transformers library by \U0001F917 Hugging Face. Therefore, pre-trained language models can be directly loaded via transformers. At this point, most decoder and encoder-decoder architectures are supported."
 keywords:
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@ keywords:
   - pytorch
   - transformers
 license: Apache-2.0
-version: 0.2.1
+version: "0.24"

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+
+# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
+
+## Our Pledge
+
+We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
+community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
+size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
+identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
+nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual
+identity and orientation.
+
+We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
+diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
+
+## Our Standards
+
+Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
+community include:
+
+* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
+* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
+* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
+* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
+  and learning from the experience
+* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall
+  community
+
+Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
+
+* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of
+  any kind
+* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
+* Public or private harassment
+* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address,
+  without their explicit permission
+* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
+  professional setting
+
+## Enforcement Responsibilities
+
+Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
+acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
+response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
+or harmful.
+
+Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
+comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
+not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
+decisions when appropriate.
+
+## Scope
+
+This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
+an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
+Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
+posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
+representative at an online or offline event.
+
+## Enforcement
+
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
+reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
+feedback@huggingface.co.
+All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
+
+All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
+reporter of any incident.
+
+## Enforcement Guidelines
+
+Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
+the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
+
+### 1. Correction
+
+**Community Impact**: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
+unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
+
+**Consequence**: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
+clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
+behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
+
+### 2. Warning
+
+**Community Impact**: A violation through a single incident or series of
+actions.
+
+**Consequence**: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
+interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
+those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
+includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
+like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent
+ban.
+
+### 3. Temporary Ban
+
+**Community Impact**: A serious violation of community standards, including
+sustained inappropriate behavior.
+
+**Consequence**: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
+communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
+private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
+with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
+Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
+
+### 4. Permanent Ban
+
+**Community Impact**: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
+standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
+individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
+
+**Consequence**: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the
+community.
+
+## Attribution
+
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage],
+version 2.1, available at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html][v2.1].
+
+Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by
+[Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder][Mozilla CoC].
+
+For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq][FAQ]. Translations are available at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations][translations].
+
+[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
+[v2.1]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html
+[Mozilla CoC]: https://github.com/mozilla/diversity
+[FAQ]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
+[translations]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -1,53 +1,428 @@
-# How to contribute
+# How to contribute to TRL?
 
-## How to get started
+Everyone is welcome to contribute, and we value everybody's contribution. Code contributions are not the only way to help the community. Answering questions, helping others, and improving the documentation are also immensely valuable.
 
-Before you start contributing make sure you installed all the dev tools:
+It also helps us if you spread the word! Reference the library in blog posts about the awesome projects it made possible, shout out on Twitter every time it has helped you, or simply ⭐️ the repository to say thank you.
+
+However you choose to contribute, please be mindful and respect our [code of conduct](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
+
+**This guide was heavily inspired by the awesome [scikit-learn guide to contributing](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).**
+
+## Ways to contribute
+
+There are several ways you can contribute to TRL:
+
+* Fix outstanding issues with the existing code.
+* Submit issues related to bugs or desired new features.
+* Implement trainers for new post-training algorithms.
+* Contribute to the examples or the documentation.
+
+If you don't know where to start, there is a special [Good First Issue](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/labels/%F0%9F%91%B6%20good%20first%20issue) listing. It will give you a list of open issues that are beginner-friendly and help you start contributing to open-source. The best way to do that is to open a Pull Request and link it to the issue that you'd like to work on. We try to give priority to opened PRs as we can easily track the progress of the fix, and if the contributor does not have time anymore, someone else can take the PR over.
+
+For something slightly more challenging, you can also take a look at the [Good Second Issue](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/labels/Good%20Second%20Issue) list. In general though, if you feel like you know what you're doing, go for it and we'll help you get there! 🚀
+
+> All contributions are equally valuable to the community. 🥰
+
+Before you start contributing make sure you have installed all the dev tools:
 
 ```bash
-pip install -e ".[dev]"
+pip install -e .[dev]
 ```
 
-## Did you find a bug?
+## Fixing outstanding issues
 
-* Ensure the bug was not already reported by searching on GitHub under Issues.
-* If you're unable to find an open issue addressing the problem, open a new one. Be sure to include a title and clear description, as much relevant information as possible, and a code sample or an executable test case demonstrating the expected behavior that is not occurring.
-* Be sure to add the complete error messages.
+If you notice an issue with the existing code and have a fix in mind, feel free to [start contributing](#submitting-a-pull-request-pr) and open a Pull Request!
 
-#### Did you write a patch that fixes a bug?
+## Submitting a bug-related issue or feature request
 
-* Open a new GitHub pull request with the patch.
-* Ensure that your PR includes a test that fails without your patch, and pass with it.
-* Ensure the PR description clearly describes the problem and solution. Include the relevant issue number if applicable.
+Do your best to follow these guidelines when submitting a bug-related issue or a feature request. It will make it easier for us to come back to you quickly and with good feedback.
 
-## PR submission guidelines
+### Did you find a bug?
 
-* Keep each PR focused. While it's more convenient, do not combine several unrelated fixes together. Create as many branches as needing to keep each PR focused.
-* Do not mix style changes/fixes with "functional" changes. It's very difficult to review such PRs and it most likely get rejected.
-* Do not add/remove vertical whitespace. Preserve the original style of the file you edit as much as you can.
-* Do not turn an already submitted PR into your development playground. If after you submitted PR, you discovered that more work is needed - close the PR, do the required work and then submit a new PR. Otherwise each of your commits requires attention from maintainers of the project.
-* If, however, you submitted a PR and received a request for changes, you should proceed with commits inside that PR, so that the maintainer can see the incremental fixes and won't need to review the whole PR again. In the exception case where you realize it'll take many many commits to complete the requests, then it's probably best to close the PR, do the work and then submit it again. Use common sense where you'd choose one way over another.
+The TRL library is robust and reliable thanks to users who report the problems they encounter.
 
-### Before you submit a PR
+Before you report an issue, we would really appreciate it if you could **make sure the bug was not already reported** (use the search bar on GitHub under Issues). Your issue should also be related to bugs in the library itself, and not your code.
 
-First you want to make sure that all the tests pass:
+Once you've confirmed the bug hasn't already been reported, please include the following information in your issue so we can quickly resolve it:
+
+* Your **OS type and version**, **Python**, **PyTorch**, **TRL** and **Transformers** versions.
+* A short, self-contained, code snippet that allows us to reproduce the bug in less than 30s.
+* The *full* traceback if an exception is raised.
+* Attach any other additional information, like screenshots, you think may help.
+
+To get the OS and software versions automatically, run the following command:
 
 ```bash
-make test
+trl env
 ```
 
-Then before submitting your PR make sure the code quality follows the standards. You can run the following command to format:
+### Do you want a new feature?
+
+If there is a new feature you'd like to see in TRL, please open an issue and describe:
+
+1. What is the *motivation* behind this feature? Is it related to a problem or frustration with the library? Is it a feature related to something you need for a project? Is it something you worked on and think it could benefit the community?
+
+   Whatever it is, we'd love to hear about it!
+
+2. Describe your requested feature in as much detail as possible. The more you can tell us about it, the better we'll be able to help you.
+3. Provide a *code snippet* that demonstrates the feature's usage.
+4. If the feature is related to a paper, please include a link.
+
+If your issue is well written we're already 80% of the way there by the time you create it.
+
+## Do you want to implement a new trainer?
+
+New post-training methods are published frequently and those that satisfy the following criteria are good candidates to be integrated into TRL:
+
+* **Simplicity:** Does the new method achieve similar performance as prior methods, but with less complexity? A good example is Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) [[Rafailov et al, 2023]](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290), which provided a simpler and compelling alternative to RLHF methods.
+* **Efficiency:** Does the new method provide a significant improvement in training efficiency? A good example is Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) [[Hong et al, 2023]](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.07691), which utilizes a similar objective as DPO but requires half the GPU VRAM.
+
+Methods that only provide incremental improvements at the expense of added complexity or compute costs are unlikely to be included in TRL.
+
+If you want to implement a trainer for a new post-training method, first open an issue and provide the following information:
+
+* A short description of the method and a link to the paper.
+* Link to the implementation if it is open-sourced.
+* Link to model weights trained with the method if they are available.
+
+Based on the community and maintainer feedback, the next step will be to implement the trainer and config classes. See the following examples for inspiration:
+
+* Paired preference optimisation: [`dpo_trainer.py`](./trl/trainer/dpo_trainer.py) and [`dpo_config.py`](./trl/trainer/dpo_config.py)
+* RL-based optimisation: [`rloo_trainer.py](./trl/trainer/rloo_trainer.py) and [`rloo_config.py](./trl/trainer/rloo_config.py)
+* Online optimisation: [`online_dpo_trainer.py`](./trl/trainer/online_dpo_trainer.py) and [`online_dpo_config.py`](./trl/trainer/online_dpo_config.py)
+
+## Do you want to add documentation?
+
+We're always looking for improvements to the documentation that make it more clear and accurate. Please let us know how the documentation can be improved, such as typos, dead links, and any missing, unclear, or inaccurate content... We'll be happy to make the changes or help you contribute if you're interested!
+
+## Submitting a pull request (PR)
+
+Before writing code, we strongly advise you to search through the existing PRs or issues to make sure that nobody is already working on the same thing. If you are unsure, it is always a good idea to open an issue to get some feedback.
+
+You will need basic `git` proficiency to be able to contribute to TRL. `git` is not the easiest tool to use but it has the greatest manual. Type `git --help` in a shell and enjoy. If you prefer books, [Pro Git](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2) is a very good reference.
+
+Follow these steps to start contributing:
+
+1. Fork the [repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl) by clicking on the 'Fork' button on the repository's page. This creates a copy of the code under your GitHub user account.
+
+2. Clone your fork to your local disk, and add the base repository as a remote. The following command assumes you have your public SSH key uploaded to GitHub. See the following guide for more [information](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/cloning-a-repository).
+
+   ```bash
+   git clone git@github.com:<your Github handle>/trl.git
+   cd trl
+   git remote add upstream https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
+   ```
+
+3. Create a new branch to hold your development changes, and do this for every new PR you work on.
+
+   Start by synchronizing your `main` branch with the `upstream/main` branch (more details in the [GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/syncing-a-fork)):
+
+   ```bash
+   git checkout main
+   git fetch upstream
+   git merge upstream/main
+   ```
+
+   Once your `main` branch is synchronized, create a new branch from it:
+
+   ```bash
+   git checkout -b a-descriptive-name-for-my-changes
+   ```
+
+   **Do not** work on the `main` branch.
+
+4. Set up a development environment by running the following command in a conda or a virtual environment you've created for working on this library:
+
+   ```bash
+   pip install -e .[dev]
+   ```
+
+   (If TRL was already installed in the virtual environment, remove it with `pip uninstall trl` before reinstalling it.)
+
+   Alternatively, if you are using [Visual Studio Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/Download), the fastest way to get set up is by using the provided Dev Container. Check [the documentation on how to get started with dev containers](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/containers).
+
+5. Develop the features on your branch.
+
+    As you work on the features, you should make sure that the test suite passes. You should run the tests impacted by your changes like this (see below an explanation regarding the environment variable):
+
+    ```bash
+    pytest tests/<TEST_TO_RUN>.py
+    ```
+
+    > For the following commands leveraging the `make` utility.
+
+    You can also run the full suite with the following command.
+
+    ```bash
+    make test
+    ```
+
+    TRL relies on `ruff` for maintaining consistent code formatting across its source files. Before submitting any PR, you should apply automatic style corrections and run code verification checks.
+
+    We provide a `precommit` target in the `Makefile` that simplifies this process by running all required checks and optimizations on only the files modified by your PR.
+
+    To apply these checks and corrections in one step, use:
+
+    ```bash
+    make precommit
+    ```
+
+    This command runs the following:
+
+    * Executes `pre-commit` hooks to automatically fix style issues with `ruff` and other tools.
+    * Runs additional scripts such as adding copyright information.
+
+    If you prefer to apply the style corrections separately or review them individually, the `pre-commit` hook will handle the formatting for the files in question.
+
+    Once you're happy with your changes, add changed files using `git add` and make a commit with `git commit` to record your changes locally:
+
+    ```bash
+    git add modified_file.py
+    git commit
+    ```
+
+    Please write [good commit messages](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/).
+
+    It is a good idea to sync your copy of the code with the original
+    repository regularly. This way you can quickly account for changes:
+
+    ```bash
+    git fetch upstream
+    git rebase upstream/main
+    ```
+
+    Push the changes to your account using:
+
+    ```bash
+    git push -u origin a-descriptive-name-for-my-changes
+    ```
+
+6. Once you are satisfied (**and the checklist below is happy too**), go to the webpage of your fork on GitHub. Click on 'Pull request' to send your changes to the project maintainers for review.
+
+7. It's ok if maintainers ask you for changes. It happens to core contributors too! To ensure everyone can review your changes in the pull request, work on your local branch and push the updates to your fork. They will automatically appear in the pull request.
+
+### Checklist
+
+1. The title of your pull request should be a summary of its contribution;
+2. If your pull request addresses an issue, please mention the issue number in the pull request description to make sure they are linked (and people consulting the issue know you are working on it);
+3. To indicate a work in progress please prefix the title with `[WIP]`, or mark the PR as a draft PR. These are useful to avoid duplicated work, and to differentiate it from PRs ready to be merged;
+4. Make sure existing tests pass;
+5. Add high-coverage tests. No quality testing = no merge.
+
+### Tests
+
+An extensive test suite is included to test the library behavior and several examples. Library tests can be found in
+the [tests folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/tests).
+
+We use `pytest` to run the tests. From the root of the
+repository here's how to run tests with `pytest` for the library:
 
 ```bash
-make precommit
+python -m pytest -sv ./tests
 ```
 
-Make sure to install `pre-commit` before running the command:
-```bash
-pip install pre-commit
-```
+That's how `make test` is implemented (without the `pip install` line)!
 
-## Do you want to contribute to the documentation?
+You can specify a smaller set of tests to test only the feature
+you're working on.
 
-* Docs are in the `docs/` folder and can be updated there.
+### Default values guidelines
 
+1. **Use defaults when appropriate**:  
+
+    Provide default values unless the parameter's value varies significantly by use case. For example, datasets or models should not have defaults, but parameters like `learning_rate` should.
+
+2. **Prioritize proven defaults**:  
+
+    Default values should align with those recommended in the original paper or method. Alternatives require strong evidence of superior performance in most cases.
+
+3. **Ensure safety and predictability**:  
+
+    Defaults must be safe, expected and reliable. Avoid settings that could lead to surprising outcomes, such as excessive memory usage or poor performance in edge cases.
+
+4. **Balance consistency and flexibility**:  
+
+    Aim for consistent defaults across similar functions or methods. However, consistency should not be preferred to point 2 or 3.
+
+5. **Opt-in for new features**:  
+
+    Do not enable new features or improvements (e.g., novel loss functions) by default. Users should explicitly opt-in to use these.
+
+### Writing documentation
+
+High-quality documentation is crucial for maintaining a project that is easy to use, understand, and extend. When adding new features, ensure they are thoroughly documented to maintain consistency and clarity throughout the project.
+
+To illustrate what good documentation looks like, here’s an example of a well-documented function:
+
+````python
+def replicate_str(string: str, n: int, sep: str = " ") -> str:
+    r"""
+    Replicate a string `n` times with a separator.
+
+    Args:
+        string (`str`):
+            String to replicate.
+        n (`int`):
+            Number of times to replicate the string.
+        sep (`str`, *optional*, defaults to `" "`):
+            Separator to use between each replication.
+    
+    Returns:
+        `str`: The replicated string.
+    
+    Examples:
+    ```python
+    >>> replicate_str("hello", 3)
+    "hello hello hello"
+    >>> replicate_str("hello", 3, sep=", ")
+    "hello, hello, hello"
+    ```
+    """
+    return sep.join([string] * n)
+````
+
+* **Line Wrapping:** Applied a consistent line wrap at column 120 to improve readability.
+* **Definite Articles:** Removed definite articles where possible to streamline language. (Eg: Changed "The string to replicate" to "String to replicate")
+* **Type Annotations:**
+  * Always include type definitions, indicating if a parameter is optional and specifying the default value.
+  * Note that `Optional` means that the value can be `None`, and `*optional*` means that it is not required for the user to pass a value.
+    E.g., for arguments that can't be `None` and aren't required:
+
+    ```txt
+    foo (`int`, *optional*, defaults to `4`):
+    ```
+
+    For arguments that can be `None` and are required:
+
+    ```txt
+    foo (`Optional[int]`):
+    ```
+
+    for arguments that can be `None` and aren't required (in this case, if the default value is `None`, you can omit it):
+
+    ```txt
+    foo (`Optional[int]`, *optional*):
+    ```
+
+* **String Defaults:**
+  * Ensured that default string values are wrapped in double quotes:
+
+    ```txt
+    defaults to `"foo"`
+    ```
+
+* **Dictionary Typing:**
+  * Replaced generic `dict` type hints with more explicit `dict[str, Any]` to clarify expected key-value pairs.
+* **Default Value Formatting:**
+  * Consistently surrounded default values with backticks for improved formatting:
+
+    ```txt
+    defaults to `4`
+    ```
+
+* **Sub-sectioning:** When the number of arguments is large, consider breaking them into sub-sections for better readability.
+
+    ```python
+    def calculate_statistics(data: list[float], precision: int = 2, include_variance: bool = False) -> dict[str, float]:
+        r"""
+        Calculates basic statistics for a given dataset.
+    
+        Args:
+            > Data inputs
+    
+            data (`list[float]`):
+                A list of numerical values to analyze.
+    
+            > Configuration parameters
+    
+            precision (`int`, *optional*, defaults to `2`):
+                Number of decimal places to round the results.
+            include_variance (`bool`, *optional*, defaults to `False`):
+                Whether to include the variance of the dataset in the results.
+    
+        Returns:
+            `dict[str, float]`:
+                A dictionary containing calculated statistics such as mean, median, and optionally variance.
+        """
+        ...
+      ```
+
+### Deprecation and backward compatibility
+
+Our approach to deprecation and backward compatibility is flexible and based on the feature’s usage and impact. Each deprecation is carefully evaluated, aiming to balance innovation with user needs.
+
+When a feature or component is marked for deprecation, its use will emit a warning message. This warning will include:
+
+* **Transition Guidance**: Instructions on how to migrate to the alternative solution or replacement.
+* **Removal Version**: The target version when the feature will be removed, providing users with a clear timeframe to transition.
+
+Example:
+
+   ```python
+   warnings.warn(
+       "The `Trainer.foo` method is deprecated and will be removed in version 0.14.0. "
+       "Please use the `Trainer.bar` class instead.",
+       FutureWarning,
+   )
+   ```
+
+The deprecation and removal schedule is based on each feature's usage and impact, with examples at two extremes:
+
+* **Experimental or Low-Use Features**: For a feature that is experimental or has limited usage, backward compatibility may not be maintained between releases. Users should therefore anticipate potential breaking changes from one version to the next.
+
+* **Widely-Used Components**: For a feature with high usage, we aim for a more gradual transition period of approximately **5 months**, generally scheduling deprecation around **5 minor releases** after the initial warning.
+
+These examples represent the two ends of a continuum. The specific timeline for each feature will be determined individually, balancing innovation with user stability needs.
+
+### Working with warnings
+
+Warnings play a critical role in guiding users toward resolving potential issues, but they should be used thoughtfully to avoid unnecessary noise. Unlike logging, which provides informational context or operational details, warnings signal conditions that require attention and action. Overusing warnings can dilute their importance, leading users to ignore them entirely.
+
+#### Definitions
+
+* **Correct**: An operation is correct if it is valid, follows the intended approach, and aligns with the current best practices or guidelines within the codebase. This is the recommended or intended way to perform the operation.
+* **Supported**: An operation is supported if it is technically valid and works within the current codebase, but it may not be the most efficient, optimal, or recommended way to perform the task. This includes deprecated features or legacy approaches that still work but may be phased out in the future.
+
+#### Choosing the right message
+
+* **Correct → No warning**:  
+   If the operation is fully valid and expected, no message should be issued. The system is working as intended, so no warning is necessary.  
+
+* **Correct but deserves attention → No warning, possibly a log message**:
+   When an operation is correct but uncommon or requires special attention, providing an informational message can be helpful. This keeps users informed without implying any issue. If available, use the logger to output this message. Example:  
+
+   ```python
+   logger.info("This is an informational message about a rare but correct operation.")
+   ```
+
+* **Correct but very likely a mistake → Warning with option to disable**:  
+   In rare cases, you may want to issue a warning for a correct operation that’s very likely a mistake. In such cases, you must provide an option to suppress the warning. This can be done with a flag in the function. Example:  
+
+   ```python
+   def my_function(foo, bar, _warn=True):
+       if foo == bar:
+           if _warn:
+               logger.warning("foo and bar are the same, this is likely a mistake. Ignore this warning by setting `_warn=False`.")
+           # Do something
+   ```
+
+* **Supported but not correct → Warning**:  
+   If the operation is technically supported but is deprecated, suboptimal, or could cause future issues (e.g., conflicting arguments), a warning should be raised. This message should be actionable, meaning it must explain how to resolve the issue. Example:  
+
+   ```python
+   def my_function(foo, bar):
+       if foo and bar:
+           logger.warning("Both `foo` and `bar` were provided, but only one is allowed. Ignoring `foo`. Please pass only one of these arguments.")
+           # Do something
+   ```
+
+* **Not supported → Exception**:  
+   If the operation is invalid or unsupported, raise an exception. This indicates that the operation cannot be performed and requires immediate attention. Example:  
+
+   ```python
+   def my_function(foo, bar):
+       if foo and bar:
+           raise ValueError("Both `foo` and `bar` were provided, but only one is allowed. Please pass only one of these arguments.")
+   ```
+
+By following this classification, you ensure that warnings, information, and exceptions are used appropriately, providing clear guidance to the user without cluttering the system with unnecessary messages.

LICENSE

@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
       same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
       identification within third-party archives.
 
-   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
+   Copyright 2020-2025 The HuggingFace Team
 
    Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
    you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.

MANIFEST.in

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-include settings.ini
 include LICENSE
 include CONTRIBUTING.md
 include README.md
+include trl/accelerate_configs/*.yaml
+include trl/templates/*.md
 recursive-exclude * __pycache__
+prune tests

Makefile

@@ -1,15 +1,19 @@
-.PHONY: test precommit benchmark_core benchmark_aux
+.PHONY: test precommit common_tests slow_tests tests_gpu test_experimental
 
 check_dirs := examples tests trl
 
+ACCELERATE_CONFIG_PATH = `pwd`/examples/accelerate_configs
+
 test:
-	python -m pytest -n auto --dist=loadfile -s -v ./tests/
+	pytest -n auto -m "not slow and not low_priority" -s -v --reruns 5 --reruns-delay 1 --only-rerun '(OSError|Timeout|HTTPError.*502|HTTPError.*504||not less than or equal to 0.01)' tests/
 
 precommit:
+	python scripts/add_copyrights.py
 	pre-commit run --all-files
+	doc-builder style trl tests docs/source --max_len 119
 
-benchmark_core:
-	bash ./benchmark/benchmark_core.sh
+slow_tests:
+	pytest -m "slow" tests/ $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "slow_tests.log",)
 
-benchmark_aux:
-	bash ./benchmark/benchmark_aux.sh
+test_experimental:
+	pytest -k "experimental"

README.md

@@ -1,180 +1,202 @@
+# TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
+
 <div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl_banner_dark.png">
+    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/trl_banner_dark.png" alt="TRL Banner">
 </div>
 
-# TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
-> Full stack transformer language models with reinforcement learning.
+<hr> <br>
+
+<h3 align="center">
+    <p>A comprehensive library to post-train foundation models</p>
+</h3>
 
 <p align="center">
-    <a href="https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/LICENSE">
-        <img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/github/license/huggingface/trl.svg?color=blue">
-    </a>
-    <a href="https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index">
-        <img alt="Documentation" src="https://img.shields.io/website/http/huggingface.co/docs/trl/index.svg?down_color=red&down_message=offline&up_message=online">
-    </a>
-    <a href="https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases">
-        <img alt="GitHub release" src="https://img.shields.io/github/release/huggingface/trl.svg">
-    </a>
+    <a href="https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/LICENSE"><img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/github/license/huggingface/trl.svg?color=blue"></a>
+    <a href="https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index"><img alt="Documentation" src="https://img.shields.io/website?label=documentation&url=https%3A%2F%2Fhuggingface.co%2Fdocs%2Ftrl%2Findex&down_color=red&down_message=offline&up_color=blue&up_message=online"></a>
+    <a href="https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases"><img alt="GitHub release" src="https://img.shields.io/github/release/huggingface/trl.svg"></a>
+    <a href="https://huggingface.co/trl-lib"><img alt="Hugging Face Hub" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/🤗%20Hub-trl--lib-yellow"></a>
 </p>
 
+## 🎉 What's New
 
-## What is it?
+> **✨ OpenAI GPT OSS Support**: TRL now fully supports fine-tuning the latest [OpenAI GPT OSS models](https://huggingface.co/collections/openai/gpt-oss-68911959590a1634ba11c7a4)! Check out the:
+>
+> - [OpenAI Cookbook](https://cookbook.openai.com/articles/gpt-oss/fine-tune-transfomers)
+> - [GPT OSS recipes](https://github.com/huggingface/gpt-oss-recipes)
+> - [Our example script](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_gpt_oss.py)
 
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/TRL-readme.png">
-</div>
+## Overview
 
-`trl` is a full stack library where we provide a set of tools to train transformer language models and stable diffusion models with Reinforcement Learning, from the Supervised Fine-tuning step (SFT), Reward Modeling step (RM) to the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) step. The library is built on top of the [`transformers`](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers) library by  🤗 Hugging Face. Therefore, pre-trained language models can be directly loaded via `transformers`. At this point, most of decoder architectures and encoder-decoder architectures are supported. Refer to the documentation or the `examples/` folder for example code snippets and how to run these tools.
+TRL is a cutting-edge library designed for post-training foundation models using advanced techniques like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Built on top of the [🤗 Transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers) ecosystem, TRL supports a variety of model architectures and modalities, and can be scaled-up across various hardware setups.
 
-**Highlights:**
+## Highlights
 
-- [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer): A light and friendly wrapper around `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune language models or adapters on a custom dataset.
-- [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer): A light wrapper around `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune language models for human preferences (Reward Modeling).
-- [`PPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/trainer#trl.PPOTrainer): A PPO trainer for language models that just needs (query, response, reward) triplets to optimise the language model.
-- [`AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/models#trl.AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead) & [`AutoModelForSeq2SeqLMWithValueHead`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/models#trl.AutoModelForSeq2SeqLMWithValueHead): A transformer model with an additional scalar output for each token which can be used as a value function in reinforcement learning.
-- [Examples](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples): Train GPT2 to generate positive movie reviews with a BERT sentiment classifier, full RLHF using adapters only, train GPT-j to be less toxic, [Stack-Llama example](https://huggingface.co/blog/stackllama), etc.
+- **Trainers**: Various fine-tuning methods are easily accessible via trainers like [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer), [`GRPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer), [`DPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer), [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer) and more.
 
-## How PPO works
-Fine-tuning a language model via PPO consists of roughly three steps:
+- **Efficient and scalable**:
+  - Leverages [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) to scale from single GPU to multi-node clusters using methods like [DDP](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/ddp_tutorial.html) and [DeepSpeed](https://github.com/deepspeedai/DeepSpeed).
+  - Full integration with [🤗 PEFT](https://github.com/huggingface/peft) enables training on large models with modest hardware via quantization and LoRA/QLoRA.
+  - Integrates [🦥 Unsloth](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) for accelerating training using optimized kernels.
 
-1. **Rollout**: The language model generates a response or continuation based on query which could be the start of a sentence.
-2. **Evaluation**: The query and response are evaluated with a function, model, human feedback or some combination of them. The important thing is that this process should yield a scalar value for each query/response pair.
-3. **Optimization**: This is the most complex part. In the optimisation step the query/response pairs are used to calculate the log-probabilities of the tokens in the sequences. This is done with the model that is trained and a reference model, which is usually the pre-trained model before fine-tuning. The KL-divergence between the two outputs is used as an additional reward signal to make sure the generated responses don't deviate too far from the reference language model. The active language model is then trained with PPO.
-
-This process is illustrated in the sketch below:
-
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl_overview.png" width="800">
-<p style="text-align: center;"> <b>Figure:</b> Sketch of the workflow. </p>
-</div>
+- **Command Line Interface (CLI)**: A simple interface lets you fine-tune with models without needing to write code.
 
 ## Installation
 
-### Python package
-Install the library with pip:
+### Python Package
+
+Install the library using `pip`:
+
 ```bash
 pip install trl
 ```
 
 ### From source
-If you want to run the examples in the repository a few additional libraries are required. Clone the repository and install it with pip:
+
+If you want to use the latest features before an official release, you can install TRL from source:
+
+```bash
+pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
+```
+
+### Repository
+
+If you want to use the examples you can clone the repository with the following command:
+
 ```bash
 git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
-cd trl/
-pip install .
 ```
 
-If you wish to develop TRL, you should install in editable mode:
-```bash
-pip install -e .
-```
+## Quick Start
 
-## How to use
+For more flexibility and control over training, TRL provides dedicated trainer classes to post-train language models or PEFT adapters on a custom dataset. Each trainer in TRL is a light wrapper around the 🤗 Transformers trainer and natively supports distributed training methods like DDP, DeepSpeed ZeRO, and FSDP.
 
 ### `SFTTrainer`
 
-This is a basic example on how to use the `SFTTrainer` from the library. The `SFTTrainer` is a light wrapper around the `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune language models or adapters on a custom dataset.
+Here is a basic example of how to use the [`SFTTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer):
 
 ```python
-# imports
-from datasets import load_dataset
 from trl import SFTTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
 
-# get dataset
-dataset = load_dataset("imdb", split="train")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
 
-# get trainer
 trainer = SFTTrainer(
-    "facebook/opt-350m",
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
     train_dataset=dataset,
-    dataset_text_field="text",
-    max_seq_length=512,
 )
+trainer.train()
+```
 
-# train
+### `GRPOTrainer`
+
+[`GRPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer) implements the [Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) algorithm](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300) that is more memory-efficient than PPO and was used to train [Deepseek AI's R1](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1).
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import GRPOTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train")
+
+# Dummy reward function: count the number of unique characters in the completions
+def reward_num_unique_chars(completions, **kwargs):
+    return [len(set(c)) for c in completions]
+
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+    reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_chars,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### `DPOTrainer`
+
+[`DPOTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer) implements the popular [Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) algorithm](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) that was used to post-train [Llama 3](https://huggingface.co/papers/2407.21783) and many other models. Here is a basic example of how to use the `DPOTrainer`:
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO")
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    processing_class=tokenizer
+)
 trainer.train()
 ```
 
 ### `RewardTrainer`
 
-This is a basic example on how to use the `RewardTrainer` from the library. The `RewardTrainer` is a wrapper around the `transformers` Trainer to easily fine-tune reward models or adapters on a custom preference dataset.
+Here is a basic example of how to use the [`RewardTrainer`](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer):
 
 ```python
-# imports
-from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer
 from trl import RewardTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
 
-# load model and dataset - dataset needs to be in a specific format
-model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("gpt2", num_labels=1)
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
 
-...
-
-# load trainer
 trainer = RewardTrainer(
-    model=model,
-    tokenizer=tokenizer,
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",
     train_dataset=dataset,
 )
-
-# train
 trainer.train()
 ```
 
-### `PPOTrainer`
+## Command Line Interface (CLI)
 
-This is a basic example on how to use the `PPOTrainer` from the library. Based on a query the language model creates a response which is then evaluated. The evaluation could be a human in the loop or another model's output.
+You can use the TRL Command Line Interface (CLI) to quickly get started with post-training methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Direct Preference Optimization (DPO):
 
-```python
-# imports
-import torch
-from transformers import AutoTokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead, create_reference_model
-from trl.core import respond_to_batch
+**SFT:**
 
-# get models
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-model_ref = create_reference_model(model)
-
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-
-# initialize trainer
-ppo_config = PPOConfig(
-    batch_size=1,
-)
-
-# encode a query
-query_txt = "This morning I went to the "
-query_tensor = tokenizer.encode(query_txt, return_tensors="pt")
-
-# get model response
-response_tensor  = respond_to_batch(model, query_tensor)
-
-# create a ppo trainer
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(ppo_config, model, model_ref, tokenizer)
-
-# define a reward for response
-# (this could be any reward such as human feedback or output from another model)
-reward = [torch.tensor(1.0)]
-
-# train model for one step with ppo
-train_stats = ppo_trainer.step([query_tensor[0]], [response_tensor[0]], reward)
+```bash
+trl sft --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/Capybara \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT
 ```
 
-## References
+**DPO:**
 
-### Proximal Policy Optimisation
-The PPO implementation largely follows the structure introduced in the paper **"Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences"** by D. Ziegler et al. \[[paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf), [code](https://github.com/openai/lm-human-preferences)].
+```bash
+trl dpo --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name argilla/Capybara-Preferences \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO 
+```
 
-### Language models
-The language models utilize the `transformers` library by 🤗 Hugging Face.
+Read more about CLI in the [relevant documentation section](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/clis) or use `--help` for more details.
+
+## Development
+
+If you want to contribute to `trl` or customize it to your needs make sure to read the [contribution guide](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and make sure you make a dev install:
+
+```bash
+git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
+cd trl/
+pip install -e .[dev]
+```
+
+## Experimental
+
+A minimal incubation area is available under `trl.experimental` for unstable / fast-evolving features. Anything there may change or be removed in any release without notice.
+
+Example:
+
+```python
+from trl.experimental.new_trainer import NewTrainer
+```
+
+Read more in the [Experimental docs](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/experimental).
 
 ## Citation
 
 ```bibtex
 @misc{vonwerra2022trl,
-  author = {Leandro von Werra and Younes Belkada and Lewis Tunstall and Edward Beeching and Tristan Thrush and Nathan Lambert and Shengyi Huang},
+  author = {Leandro von Werra and Younes Belkada and Lewis Tunstall and Edward Beeching and Tristan Thrush and Nathan Lambert and Shengyi Huang and Kashif Rasul and Quentin Gallouédec},
   title = {TRL: Transformer Reinforcement Learning},
   year = {2020},
   publisher = {GitHub},
@@ -182,3 +204,7 @@ The language models utilize the `transformers` library by 🤗 Hugging Face.
   howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/huggingface/trl}}
 }
 ```
+
+## License
+
+This repository's source code is available under the [Apache-2.0 License](LICENSE).

RELEASE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+# Making a release
+
+> [!NOTE]
+> VERSION needs to be formatted following the `v{major}.{minor}.{patch}` convention. We need to follow this convention to be able to retrieve versioned scripts.
+
+## Major/Minor Release
+
+### 1. Ensure your local repository is up to date with the upstream repository
+
+```bash
+git checkout main
+git pull origin main
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Do not merge other pull requests into `main` until the release is done. This is to ensure that the release is stable and does not include any untested changes. Announce internally (#trl-internal) to other maintainers that you are doing a release and that they must not merge PRs until the release is done.
+
+### 2. Create a release branch from main
+
+```bash
+git checkout -b release-v{major}.{minor}
+```
+
+### 3. Change the version in the following files
+
+- `.github/workflows/tests_latest.yml`:
+  
+  ```diff
+  - with: { ref: v{major}.{minor-1}-release }
+  + with: { ref: v{major}.{minor}-release }
+  ```
+
+- `CITATION.cff`
+
+  ```diff
+  - version: "{major}.{minor-1}"
+  + version: "{major}.{minor}"
+  ```
+
+- `VERSION`
+
+  ```diff
+  - {major}.{minor}.0.dev0
+  + {major}.{minor}.0
+  ```
+
+### 4. Commit and push these changes
+
+```shell
+git add .github/workflows/tests_latest.yml CITATION.cff VERSION
+git commit -m 'Release: {major}.{minor}'
+git push origin release-v{major}.{minor}
+```
+
+### 5. Create a pull request
+
+from `release-v{major}.{minor}` to `main`, named `Release: v{major}.{minor}`, wait for tests to pass, and request a review.
+
+### 6. Once the pull request is approved, merge it into `main`
+
+It will automatically publish the new version of the package on PyPI.
+
+### 7. Add a tag in git to mark the release
+
+```shell
+git checkout main
+git pull origin main
+git tag -a v{major}.{minor}.0 -m 'Adds tag v{major}.{minor}.0 for PyPI'
+git push origin v{major}.{minor}.0
+```
+
+### 8. Create a branch `v{major}.{minor}-release` for future patch releases
+
+```shell
+git checkout -b v{major}.{minor}-release
+git push origin v{major}.{minor}-release
+```
+
+This ensures that future patch releases (`v{major}.{minor}.1`, `v{major}.{minor}.2`, etc.) can be made separately from `main`.
+
+### 9. Create a GitHub Release
+
+1. Go to the repo’s [releases section](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases) on GitHub.
+2. Click **Draft a new release**.
+3. Select the `v{major}.{minor}.0` tag you just created in step 7.
+4. Add a title (`v{major}.{minor}.0`) and a short description of what’s new.
+5. Click **Publish Release**.
+
+### 10. Bump to dev version
+
+1. Create a branch `bump-dev-version-{major}.{minor+1}` from `main` and checkout to it.
+
+  ```shell
+  git checkout -b bump-dev-version-{major}.{minor+1}
+  ```
+
+2. Change the version in file `VERSION`:
+
+  ```diff
+  - {major}.{minor}.0
+  + {major}.{minor+1}.0.dev0
+  ```
+
+3. Commit and push these changes
+
+  ```shell
+  git add VERSION
+  git commit -m '⬆️ Bump dev version'
+  git push origin bump-dev-version-{major}.{minor+1}
+  ```
+
+4. Create a pull request from `bump-dev-version-{major}.{minor+1}` to `main`, named `⬆️ Bump dev version`, and request urgent review.
+
+5. Once the pull request is approved, merge it into `main`.
+
+6. The codebase is now ready for the next development cycle, inform the team in the #trl-internal channel.
+
+## Making a patch release
+
+### 1. Ensure your local repository is up to date with the upstream repository
+
+```bash
+git checkout v{major}.{minor}-release
+git pull origin main
+```
+
+### 2. Cherry-pick the changes you want to include in the patch release
+
+```bash
+git cherry-pick <commit-hash-0>
+git cherry-pick <commit-hash-1>
+...
+```
+
+### 3. Change the version in the file `VERSION`
+
+```diff
+- {major}.{minor}.{patch-1}
++ {major}.{minor}.{patch}
+```
+
+### 4. Commit and push these changes
+
+```shell
+git add VERSION
+git commit -m 'Release: {major}.{minor}.{patch}'
+git push origin v{major}.{minor}-release
+```
+
+### 5. Wait for the CI to pass
+
+The CI will automatically publish the new version of the package on PyPI.
+
+### 6. Add a tag in git to mark the release
+
+```shell
+git tag -a v{major}.{minor}.{patch} -m 'Adds tag v{major}.{minor}.{patch} for PyPI'
+git push origin v{major}.{minor}.{patch}
+```
+
+#### 7. Create a GitHub Release
+
+1. Go to the repo’s [releases section](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/releases) on GitHub.
+2. Click **Draft a new release**.
+3. Select the `v{major}.{minor}.{patch}` tag you just created in step 7.
+4. Add a title (`v{major}.{minor}.{patch}`) and a short description of what’s new.
+5. Click **Publish Release**.

VERSION

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0.25.0.dev0

benchmark/benchmark.py

@@ -1,150 +0,0 @@
-import argparse
-import math
-import os
-import shlex
-import subprocess
-import uuid
-from distutils.util import strtobool
-
-import requests
-
-
-def parse_args():
-    # fmt: off
-    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
-    parser.add_argument("--command", type=str, default="",
-        help="the command to run")
-    parser.add_argument("--num-seeds", type=int, default=3,
-        help="the number of random seeds")
-    parser.add_argument("--start-seed", type=int, default=1,
-        help="the number of the starting seed")
-    parser.add_argument("--workers", type=int, default=0,
-        help="the number of workers to run benchmark experimenets")
-    parser.add_argument("--auto-tag", type=lambda x: bool(strtobool(x)), default=True, nargs="?", const=True,
-        help="if toggled, the runs will be tagged with git tags, commit, and pull request number if possible")
-    parser.add_argument("--slurm-template-path", type=str, default=None,
-        help="the path to the slurm template file (see docs for more details)")
-    parser.add_argument("--slurm-gpus-per-task", type=int, default=1,
-        help="the number of gpus per task to use for slurm jobs")
-    parser.add_argument("--slurm-total-cpus", type=int, default=50,
-        help="the number of gpus per task to use for slurm jobs")
-    parser.add_argument("--slurm-ntasks", type=int, default=1,
-        help="the number of tasks to use for slurm jobs")
-    parser.add_argument("--slurm-nodes", type=int, default=None,
-        help="the number of nodes to use for slurm jobs")
-    args = parser.parse_args()
-    # fmt: on
-    return args
-
-
-def run_experiment(command: str):
-    command_list = shlex.split(command)
-    print(f"running {command}")
-
-    # Use subprocess.PIPE to capture the output
-    fd = subprocess.Popen(command_list, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
-    output, errors = fd.communicate()
-
-    return_code = fd.returncode
-    assert return_code == 0, f"Command failed with error: {errors.decode('utf-8')}"
-
-    # Convert bytes to string and strip leading/trailing whitespaces
-    return output.decode("utf-8").strip()
-
-
-def autotag() -> str:
-    wandb_tag = ""
-    print("autotag feature is enabled")
-    git_tag = ""
-    try:
-        git_tag = subprocess.check_output(["git", "describe", "--tags"]).decode("ascii").strip()
-        print(f"identified git tag: {git_tag}")
-    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
-        print(e)
-    if len(git_tag) == 0:
-        try:
-            count = int(subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-list", "--count", "HEAD"]).decode("ascii").strip())
-            hash = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--short", "HEAD"]).decode("ascii").strip()
-            git_tag = f"no-tag-{count}-g{hash}"
-            print(f"identified git tag: {git_tag}")
-        except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
-            print(e)
-    wandb_tag = f"{git_tag}"
-
-    git_commit = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "--verify", "HEAD"]).decode("ascii").strip()
-    try:
-        # try finding the pull request number on github
-        prs = requests.get(f"https://api.github.com/search/issues?q=repo:huggingface/trl+is:pr+{git_commit}")
-        if prs.status_code == 200:
-            prs = prs.json()
-            if len(prs["items"]) > 0:
-                pr = prs["items"][0]
-                pr_number = pr["number"]
-                wandb_tag += f",pr-{pr_number}"
-        print(f"identified github pull request: {pr_number}")
-    except Exception as e:
-        print(e)
-
-    return wandb_tag
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    args = parse_args()
-    if args.auto_tag:
-        existing_wandb_tag = os.environ.get("WANDB_TAGS", "")
-        wandb_tag = autotag()
-        if len(wandb_tag) > 0:
-            if len(existing_wandb_tag) > 0:
-                os.environ["WANDB_TAGS"] = ",".join([existing_wandb_tag, wandb_tag])
-            else:
-                os.environ["WANDB_TAGS"] = wandb_tag
-    print("WANDB_TAGS: ", os.environ.get("WANDB_TAGS", ""))
-    commands = []
-    for seed in range(0, args.num_seeds):
-        commands += [" ".join([args.command, "--seed", str(args.start_seed + seed)])]
-
-    print("======= commands to run:")
-    for command in commands:
-        print(command)
-
-    if args.workers > 0 and args.slurm_template_path is None:
-        from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
-
-        executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=args.workers, thread_name_prefix="cleanrl-benchmark-worker-")
-        for command in commands:
-            executor.submit(run_experiment, command)
-        executor.shutdown(wait=True)
-    else:
-        print("not running the experiments because --workers is set to 0; just printing the commands to run")
-
-    # SLURM logic
-    if args.slurm_template_path is not None:
-        if not os.path.exists("slurm"):
-            os.makedirs("slurm")
-        if not os.path.exists("slurm/logs"):
-            os.makedirs("slurm/logs")
-        print("======= slurm commands to run:")
-        with open(args.slurm_template_path) as f:
-            slurm_template = f.read()
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{array}}", f"0-{len(commands) - 1}%{args.workers}")
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace(
-            "{{seeds}}", f"({' '.join([str(args.start_seed + int(seed)) for seed in range(args.num_seeds)])})"
-        )
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{len_seeds}}", f"{args.num_seeds}")
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{command}}", args.command)
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{gpus_per_task}}", f"{args.slurm_gpus_per_task}")
-        total_gpus = args.slurm_gpus_per_task * args.slurm_ntasks
-        slurm_cpus_per_gpu = math.ceil(args.slurm_total_cpus / total_gpus)
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{cpus_per_gpu}}", f"{slurm_cpus_per_gpu}")
-        slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{ntasks}}", f"{args.slurm_ntasks}")
-        if args.slurm_nodes is not None:
-            slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{nodes}}", f"#SBATCH --nodes={args.slurm_nodes}")
-        else:
-            slurm_template = slurm_template.replace("{{nodes}}", "")
-        filename = str(uuid.uuid4())
-        open(os.path.join("slurm", f"{filename}.slurm"), "w").write(slurm_template)
-        slurm_path = os.path.join("slurm", f"{filename}.slurm")
-        print(f"saving command in {slurm_path}")
-        if args.workers > 0:
-            job_id = run_experiment(f"sbatch --parsable {slurm_path}")
-            print(f"Job ID: {job_id}")

benchmark/benchmark_and_report.sh

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-#### Step 1: create a work directory:
-# this is necessary because another github action job will remove
-# the entire directory, which slurm depends on.
-# https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632028/how-to-create-a-temporary-directory
-MY_SLURM_TMP_DIR=/fsx/costa/slurm_tmpdir
-mkdir -p $MY_SLURM_TMP_DIR
-WORK_DIR=`mktemp -d -p "$MY_SLURM_TMP_DIR"`
-cp -r "$PWD" "$WORK_DIR"
-cd "$WORK_DIR/$(basename "$PWD")"
-echo WORK_DIR: $WORK_DIR
-
-#### Step 2: actual work starts:
-echo PATH is $PATH
-echo PYTHONPATH is $PYTHONPATH
-echo whcih python is $(which python)
-
-export WANDB_ENTITY=huggingface
-bash $BENCHMARK_SCRIPT > output.txt
-
-# Extract Job IDs into an array
-job_ids=($(grep "Job ID:" output.txt | awk '{print $3}'))
-
-# Extract WANDB_TAGS into an array
-WANDB_TAGS=($(grep "WANDB_TAGS:" output.txt | awk '{print $2}'))
-WANDB_TAGS=($(echo $WANDB_TAGS | tr "," "\n"))
-
-# Print to verify
-echo "Job IDs: ${job_ids[@]}"
-echo "WANDB_TAGS: ${WANDB_TAGS[@]}"
-
-TAGS_STRING="?tag=${WANDB_TAGS[0]}"
-FOLDER_STRING="${WANDB_TAGS[0]}"
-for tag in "${WANDB_TAGS[@]:1}"; do
-    TAGS_STRING+="&tag=$tag"
-    FOLDER_STRING+="_$tag"
-done
-
-echo "TAGS_STRING: $TAGS_STRING"
-echo "FOLDER_STRING: $FOLDER_STRING"
-
-TAGS_STRING=$TAGS_STRING FOLDER_STRING=$FOLDER_STRING BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT=$BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT sbatch --dependency=afterany:$job_ids benchmark/post_github_comment.sbatch

benchmark/benchmark_level1.sh

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-# hello world experiment
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template

benchmark/benchmark_level1_plot.sh

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-# pip install openrlbenchmark==0.2.1a5
-# see https://github.com/openrlbenchmark/openrlbenchmark#get-started for documentation
-echo "we deal with $TAGS_STRING"
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "ppo$TAGS_STRING" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$FOLDER_STRING/hello_world \
-    --scan-history
-
-python benchmark/upload_benchmark.py \
-    --folder_path="benchmark/trl/$FOLDER_STRING" \
-    --path_in_repo="images/benchmark/$FOLDER_STRING" \
-    --repo_id="trl-internal-testing/example-images" \
-    --repo_type="dataset"
-

benchmark/benchmark_level2.sh

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-# compound experiments: gpt2xl + grad_accu
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_gpt2xl_grad_accu --ppo_config.model_name gpt2-xl --ppo_config.mini_batch_size 16 --ppo_config.gradient_accumulation_steps 8 --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template
-
-# compound experiments: Cerebras-GPT-6.7B + deepspeed zero2 + grad_accu
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero2.yaml examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_Cerebras-GPT-6.7B_grad_accu_deepspeed_stage2  --ppo_config.batch_size 32  --ppo_config.mini_batch_size 32 --ppo_config.log_with wandb --ppo_config.model_name cerebras/Cerebras-GPT-6.7B --ppo_config.reward_model sentiment-analysis:cerebras/Cerebras-GPT-6.7B" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 8 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 90 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template

benchmark/benchmark_level2_plot.sh

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# pip install openrlbenchmark==0.2.1a5
-# see https://github.com/openrlbenchmark/openrlbenchmark#get-started for documentation
-echo "we deal with $TAGS_STRING"
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "ppo$TAGS_STRING" \
-        "ppo_gpt2xl_grad_accu$TAGS_STRING" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$FOLDER_STRING/different_models \
-    --scan-history
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "ppo_Cerebras-GPT-6.7B_grad_accu_deepspeed_stage2$TAGS_STRING" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:cerebras/Cerebras-GPT-6.7B \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$FOLDER_STRING/deepspeed \
-    --scan-history
-
-python benchmark/upload_benchmark.py \
-    --folder_path="benchmark/trl/$FOLDER_STRING" \
-    --path_in_repo="images/benchmark/$FOLDER_STRING" \
-    --repo_id="trl-internal-testing/example-images" \
-    --repo_type="dataset"
-

benchmark/benchmark_level3.sh

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-## w/ and w/o gradient accumulation
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_step_grad_accu --ppo_config.mini_batch_size 1 --ppo_config.gradient_accumulation_steps 128 --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template
-
-## w/ different models (gpt2, gpt2-xl, falcon, llama2)
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_gpt2 --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_falcon_rw_1b --ppo_config.model_name tiiuae/falcon-rw-1b --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template
-
-
-## w/ and w/o PEFT
-python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/scripts/ppo.py --ppo_config.exp_name ppo_peft --use_peft --ppo_config.log_with wandb" \
-    --num-seeds 3 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-nodes 1 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 12 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template

benchmark/plot.sh

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-# pip install openrlbenchmark==0.2.1a5
-# see https://github.com/openrlbenchmark/openrlbenchmark#get-started for documentation
-BASELINE_PR_TAG=v0.4.7-55-g110e672
-BASELINE_PR_NAME=PR-662
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "sentiment_tuning?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$BASELINE_PR_TAG/sentiment \
-    --scan-history
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "sentiment_tuning?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-        "sentiment_tuning_step_grad_accu?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb gradient accumulation ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$BASELINE_PR_TAG/gradient_accu \
-    --scan-history
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "sentiment_tuning?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-        "sentiment_tuning_gpt2?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment gpt2 ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-        "sentiment_tuning_falcon_rw_1b?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment tiiuae/falcon-rw-1b ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-        "sentiment_tuning_gpt2xl_grad_accu?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment gpt2xl ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$BASELINE_PR_TAG/different_models \
-    --scan-history
-
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.reward_model&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.exp_name&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        "sentiment_tuning?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-        "sentiment_tuning_peft?tag=$BASELINE_PR_TAG&cl=sentiment lvwerra/gpt2-imdb w/ peft ($BASELINE_PR_NAME)" \
-    --env-ids sentiment-analysis:lvwerra/distilbert-imdb \
-    --no-check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename benchmark/trl/$BASELINE_PR_TAG/peft \
-    --scan-history
-
-
-python benchmark/upload_benchmark.py \
-    --folder_path="benchmark/trl/$BASELINE_PR_TAG" \
-    --path_in_repo="images/benchmark/$BASELINE_PR_TAG" \
-    --repo_id="trl-internal-testing/example-images" \
-    --repo_type="dataset"

benchmark/post_github_comment.py

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-import json
-import os
-
-from ghapi.all import GhApi
-
-
-FOLDER_STRING = os.environ.get("FOLDER_STRING", "")
-folder = f"benchmark/trl/{FOLDER_STRING}"
-host_url = f"https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/benchmark/{FOLDER_STRING}"
-
-# Create a GitHub API instance
-github_context = json.loads(os.environ["GITHUB_CONTEXT"])
-token = os.environ["PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN_GITHUB"]  # this needs to refreshed every 12 months
-status_message = "**[COSTA BENCHMARK BOT]**: Here are the results"
-body = status_message
-repo = github_context["repository"]
-owner, repo = repo.split("/")
-api = GhApi(owner=owner, repo=repo, token=token)
-
-# for each `.png` file in the folder, add it to the comment
-for file in os.listdir(folder):
-    if file.endswith(".png"):
-        body += f"\n![{file}]({host_url}/{file})"
-
-# Create a comment on the issue
-api.issues.create_comment(issue_number=github_context["event"]["issue"]["number"], body=body)

benchmark/post_github_comment.sbatch

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/bash
-#SBATCH --job-name=trl
-#SBATCH --partition=production-cluster
-#SBATCH --ntasks=1
-#SBATCH --output=slurm/logs/%x_%j.out
-
-sleep 2m
-bash $BENCHMARK_PLOT_SCRIPT
-srun python benchmark/post_github_comment.py

benchmark/trl.slurm_template

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/bash
-#SBATCH --job-name=trl
-#SBATCH --partition=production-cluster
-#SBATCH --gpus-per-task={{gpus_per_task}}
-#SBATCH --cpus-per-gpu={{cpus_per_gpu}}
-#SBATCH --ntasks={{ntasks}}
-#SBATCH --output=slurm/logs/%x_%j.out
-#SBATCH --array={{array}}
-#SBATCH --exclude=ip-26-0-156-239,ip-26-0-148-151,ip-26-0-146-212,ip-26-0-145-137,ip-26-0-146-249,ip-26-0-146-149,ip-26-0-147-233,ip-26-0-145-154,ip-26-0-144-35,ip-26-0-144-189,ip-26-0-146-183,ip-26-0-147-120,ip-26-0-144-95,ip-26-0-145-193
-{{nodes}}
-
-seeds={{seeds}}
-seed=${seeds[$SLURM_ARRAY_TASK_ID % {{len_seeds}}]}
-
-echo "Running task $SLURM_ARRAY_TASK_ID with seed: $seed"
-srun {{command}} --ppo_config.seed $seed

benchmark/upload_benchmark.py

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-from dataclasses import dataclass
-
-import tyro
-from huggingface_hub import HfApi
-
-
-@dataclass
-class Args:
-    folder_path: str = "benchmark/trl"
-    path_in_repo: str = "images/benchmark"
-    repo_id: str = "trl-internal-testing/example-images"
-    repo_type: str = "dataset"
-
-
-args = tyro.cli(Args)
-api = HfApi()
-
-api.upload_folder(
-    folder_path=args.folder_path,
-    path_in_repo=args.path_in_repo,
-    repo_id=args.repo_id,
-    repo_type=args.repo_type,
-)

docker/trl-dev/Dockerfile

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+FROM pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-runtime
+RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y git && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
+RUN pip install --upgrade pip uv
+RUN uv pip install --system --no-cache "git+https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git#egg=trl[liger,peft,vlm]"
+RUN uv pip install --system hf_transfer liger_kernel trackio peft
+RUN uv pip install --system https://github.com/Dao-AILab/flash-attention/releases/download/v2.8.3/flash_attn-2.8.3+cu12torch2.8cxx11abiFALSE-cp311-cp311-linux_x86_64.whl

docker/trl/Dockerfile

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+FROM pytorch/pytorch:2.8.0-cuda12.8-cudnn9-runtime
+RUN pip install --upgrade pip uv
+RUN uv pip install --system trl[liger,peft,vlm] hf_transfer trackio
+RUN uv pip install --system https://github.com/Dao-AILab/flash-attention/releases/download/v2.8.3/flash_attn-2.8.3+cu12torch2.8cxx11abiFALSE-cp311-cp311-linux_x86_64.whl

docs/source/_toctree.yml

@@ -1,54 +1,112 @@
 - sections:
   - local: index
     title: TRL
-  - local: quickstart
-    title: Quickstart
   - local: installation
     title: Installation
-  - local: how_to_train
-    title: PPO Training FAQ
-  - local: use_model
-    title: Use Trained Models
-  - local: customization
-    title: Customize the Training
-  - local: logging
-    title: Understanding Logs
-  title: Get started
+  - local: quickstart
+    title: Quickstart
+  title: Getting started
 - sections:
-  - local: models
-    title: Model Classes
-  - local: trainer
-    title: Trainer Classes
-  - local: reward_trainer
-    title: Reward Model Training
-  - local: sft_trainer
-    title: Supervised Fine-Tuning
-  - local: ppo_trainer
-    title: PPO Trainer
-  - local: best_of_n
-    title: Best of N Sampling
-  - local: dpo_trainer
-    title: DPO Trainer
-  - local: ddpo_trainer
-    title: Denoising Diffusion Policy Optimization
-  - local: iterative_sft_trainer
-    title: Iterative Supervised Fine-Tuning
-  - local: text_environments
-    title: Text Environments
-  title: API
+  - local: dataset_formats
+    title: Dataset Formats
+  - local: paper_index
+    title: Paper Index
+  - local: experimental
+    title: Experimental
+  title: Conceptual Guides
+- sections:
+  - local: clis
+    title: Command Line Interface (CLI)
+  - local: jobs_training
+    title: Training using Jobs
+  - local: customization
+    title: Customizing the Training
+  - local: reducing_memory_usage
+    title: Reducing Memory Usage
+  - local: speeding_up_training
+    title: Speeding Up Training
+  - local: distributing_training
+    title: Distributing Training
+  - local: use_model
+    title: Using Trained Models
+  title: How-to guides
+- sections:
+  - local: deepspeed_integration
+    title: DeepSpeed
+  - local: kernels_hub
+    title: Kernels Hub
+  - local: liger_kernel_integration
+    title: Liger Kernel
+  - local: peft_integration
+    title: PEFT
+  - local: trackio_integration
+    title: Trackio
+  - local: unsloth_integration
+    title: Unsloth
+  - local: vllm_integration
+    title: vLLM
+  title: Integrations
 - sections:
   - local: example_overview
     title: Example Overview
+  - local: community_tutorials
+    title: Community Tutorials
+  - local: lora_without_regret
+    title: LoRA Without Regret
   - local: sentiment_tuning
     title: Sentiment Tuning
-  - local: lora_tuning_peft
-    title: Training with PEFT
-  - local: detoxifying_a_lm
-    title: Detoxifying a Language Model
-  - local: using_llama_models
-    title: Training StackLlama
-  - local: learning_tools
-    title: Learning to Use Tools
   - local: multi_adapter_rl
     title: Multi Adapter RLHF
   title: Examples
+- sections:
+  - sections: # Sorted alphabetically
+    - local: bco_trainer
+      title: BCO
+    - local: cpo_trainer
+      title: CPO
+    - local: dpo_trainer
+      title: DPO
+    - local: online_dpo_trainer
+      title: Online DPO
+    - local: gkd_trainer
+      title: GKD
+    - local: grpo_trainer
+      title: GRPO
+    - local: kto_trainer
+      title: KTO
+    - local: nash_md_trainer
+      title: Nash-MD
+    - local: orpo_trainer
+      title: ORPO
+    - local: ppo_trainer
+      title: PPO
+    - local: prm_trainer
+      title: PRM
+    - local: reward_trainer
+      title: Reward
+    - local: rloo_trainer
+      title: RLOO
+    - local: sft_trainer
+      title: SFT
+    - local: xpo_trainer
+      title: XPO
+    title: Trainers
+  - local: models
+    title: Model Classes
+  - local: model_utils
+    title: Model Utilities
+  - local: best_of_n
+    title: Best of N Sampling
+  - local: judges
+    title: Judges
+  - local: callbacks
+    title: Callbacks
+  - local: data_utils
+    title: Data Utilities
+  - local: rewards
+    title: Reward Functions
+  - local: script_utils
+    title: Script Utilities
+  - local: others
+    title: Others
+  title: API

docs/source/bco_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+# BCO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-BCO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=bco,trl)
+
+TRL supports the Binary Classifier Optimization (BCO).
+The [BCO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.04656) authors train a binary classifier whose logit serves as a reward so that the classifier maps {prompt, chosen completion} pairs to 1 and {prompt, rejected completion} pairs to 0.
+For a full example have a look at  [`examples/scripts/bco.py`].
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+The [`BCOTrainer`] requires an [unpaired preference dataset](dataset_formats#unpaired-preference).
+The [`BCOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+## Expected model format
+
+The BCO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
+
+## Using the `BCOTrainer`
+
+For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/bco.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `BCOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train and a reference `ref_model` which we will use to calculate the implicit rewards of the preferred and rejected response.
+
+The `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above. Note that the `model` and `ref_model` need to have the same architecture (ie decoder only or encoder-decoder).
+
+```python
+training_args = BCOConfig(
+    beta=0.1,
+)
+
+bco_trainer = BCOTrainer(
+    model,
+    model_ref,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=train_dataset,
+    processing_class=tokenizer,
+)
+```
+
+After this one can then call:
+
+```python
+bco_trainer.train()
+```
+
+## Underlying Distribution matching (UDM)
+
+In practical scenarios, the thumbs-up and thumbs-down datasets are likely to have divergent underlying distributions of prompts.
+Consider an LLM deployed for user feedback: if the model excels in writing tasks but underperforms in coding, the thumbs-up dataset will be dominated by writing-related prompts, while the thumbs-down dataset will contain mostly coding-related prompts.  
+If the prompts in your desired and undesired datasets differ a lot, it is useful to enable UDM.  
+
+Choose an embedding model and tokenizer:
+
+```python
+embedding_model = AutoModel.from_pretrained(your_model_id)
+embedding_tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(your_model_id)
+
+# customize this function depending on your embedding model
+def embed_prompt(input_ids, attention_mask, model):
+    outputs = model(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)
+    return outputs.last_hidden_state.mean(dim=1)
+
+embedding_model = Accelerator().prepare_model(self.embedding_model)
+embedding_func = partial(embed_prompt, model=embedding_model)
+```
+
+Set `prompt_sample_size` to define how many prompts are selected to train the UDM classifier and start the training with the provided embedding function:
+
+```python
+training_args = BCOConfig(
+    beta=0.1,
+    prompt_sample_size=512,
+)
+
+bco_trainer = BCOTrainer(
+    model,
+    model_ref,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=train_dataset,
+    processing_class=tokenizer,
+    embedding_func=embedding_func,
+    embedding_tokenizer=self.embedding_tokenizer,
+)
+
+bco_trainer.train()
+```
+
+### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
+
+MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.  
+To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.  
+
+This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. MixtralConfig).  
+To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: 0.001).
+
+## BCOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] BCOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## BCOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] BCOConfig

docs/source/best_of_n.md

@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-# Best of N sampling: Alternative ways to get better model output without RL based fine-tuning 
+# Best of N sampling: Alternative ways to get better model output without RL based fine-tuning
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Best-of-N sampling is deprecated and will be removed in TRL 0.25.0.
 
 Within the extras module is the `best-of-n` sampler class that serves as an alternative method of generating better model output.
 As to how it fares against the RL based fine-tuning, please look in the `examples` directory for a comparison example
@@ -8,7 +11,6 @@ As to how it fares against the RL based fine-tuning, please look in the `example
 To get started quickly, instantiate an instance of the class with a model, a length sampler, a tokenizer and a callable that serves as a proxy reward pipeline that outputs reward scores for input queries
 
 ```python
-
 from transformers import pipeline, AutoTokenizer
 from trl import AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
 from trl.core import LengthSampler
@@ -19,41 +21,33 @@ reward_pipe = pipeline("sentiment-analysis", model=reward_model, device=device)
 tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(ref_model_name)
 tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
 
-
 # callable that takes a list of raw text and returns a list of corresponding reward scores
 def queries_to_scores(list_of_strings):
   return [output["score"] for output in reward_pipe(list_of_strings)]
 
 best_of_n = BestOfNSampler(model, tokenizer, queries_to_scores, length_sampler=output_length_sampler)
-
-
 ```
 
 And assuming you have a list/tensor of tokenized queries, you can generate better output by calling the `generate` method
 
 ```python
-
 best_of_n.generate(query_tensors, device=device, **gen_kwargs)
-
 ```
+
 The default sample size is 4, but you can change it at the time of instance initialization like so
 
 ```python
-
 best_of_n = BestOfNSampler(model, tokenizer, queries_to_scores, length_sampler=output_length_sampler, sample_size=8)
-
 ```
 
 The default output is the result of taking the top scored output for each query, but you can change it to top 2 and so on by passing the `n_candidates` argument at the time of instance initialization
 
 ```python
-
 best_of_n = BestOfNSampler(model, tokenizer, queries_to_scores, length_sampler=output_length_sampler, n_candidates=2)
-
 ```
 
 There is the option of setting the generation settings (like `temperature`, `pad_token_id`) at the time of instance creation as opposed to when calling the `generate` method.
-This is done by passing a `GenerationConfig` from the `transformers` library at the time of initialization
+This is done by passing a [`~transformers.GenerationConfig`] from the `transformers` library at the time of initialization
 
 ```python
 
@@ -67,6 +61,8 @@ best_of_n.generate(query_tensors, device=device)
 
 ```
 
-Furthermore, at the time of initialization you can set the seed to control repeatability of the generation process and the number of samples to generate for each query
+Furthermore, at the time of initialization you can set the seed to control the repeatability of the generation process and the number of samples to generate for each query
 
+## BestOfNSampler
 
+[[autodoc]] BestOfNSampler

docs/source/callbacks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Callbacks
+
+## SyncRefModelCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] SyncRefModelCallback
+
+## RichProgressCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] RichProgressCallback
+
+## WinRateCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] WinRateCallback
+
+## LogCompletionsCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] LogCompletionsCallback
+
+## MergeModelCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] MergeModelCallback
+
+## BEMACallback
+
+[[autodoc]] BEMACallback
+
+## WeaveCallback
+
+[[autodoc]] WeaveCallback

docs/source/clis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
+# Command Line Interfaces (CLIs)
+
+TRL provides a powerful command-line interface (CLI) to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) using methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and more. The CLI abstracts away much of the boilerplate, letting you launch training jobs quickly and reproducibly.
+
+## Commands
+
+Currently supported commands are:
+
+### Training Commands
+
+- `trl dpo`: fine-tune a LLM with DPO
+- `trl grpo`: fine-tune a LLM with GRPO
+- `trl kto`: fine-tune a LLM with KTO
+- `trl reward`: train a Reward Model
+- `trl rloo`: fine-tune a LLM with RLOO
+- `trl sft`: fine-tune a LLM with SFT
+
+### Other Commands
+
+- `trl env`: get the system information
+- `trl vllm-serve`: serve a model with vLLM
+
+## Fine-Tuning with the TRL CLI
+
+### Basic Usage
+
+You can launch training directly from the CLI by specifying required arguments like the model and dataset:
+
+<hfoptions id="command_line">
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+```bash
+trl sft \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+```bash
+trl dpo \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward">
+
+```bash
+trl reward \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### Using Configuration Files
+
+To keep your CLI commands clean and reproducible, you can define all training arguments in a YAML configuration file:
+
+<hfoptions id="config_file">
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+```yaml
+# sft_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: stanfordnlp/imdb
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+```yaml
+# dpo_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: anthropic/hh-rlhf
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward">
+
+```yaml
+# reward_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### Scaling Up with Accelerate
+
+TRL CLI natively supports [🤗 Accelerate](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate), making it easy to scale training across multiple GPUs, machines, or use advanced setups like DeepSpeed — all from the same CLI.
+
+You can pass any `accelerate launch` arguments directly to `trl`, such as `--num_processes`. For more information see [Using accelerate launch](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/en/basic_tutorials/launch#using-accelerate-launch).
+
+<hfoptions id="launch_args">
+<hfoption id="SFT inline">
+
+```bash
+trl sft \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb \
+  --num_processes 4
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="SFT w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# sft_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: stanfordnlp/imdb
+num_processes: 4
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO inline">
+
+```bash
+trl dpo \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf \
+  --num_processes 4
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# dpo_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: anthropic/hh-rlhf
+num_processes: 4
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward inline">
+
+```bash
+trl reward \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
+  --num_processes 4
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# reward_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+num_processes: 4
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### Using `--accelerate_config` for Accelerate Configuration
+
+The `--accelerate_config` flag lets you easily configure distributed training with [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate). This flag accepts either:
+
+- the name of a predefined config profile (built into TRL), or
+- a path to a custom Accelerate YAML config file.
+
+#### Predefined Config Profiles
+
+TRL provides several ready-to-use Accelerate configs to simplify common training setups:
+
+| Name | Description |
+| --- | --- |
+| `fsdp1` | Fully Sharded Data Parallel Stage 1 |
+| `fsdp2` | Fully Sharded Data Parallel Stage 2 |
+| `zero1` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 1 |
+| `zero2` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 2 |
+| `zero3` | DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 3 |
+| `multi_gpu` | Multi-GPU training |
+| `single_gpu` | Single-GPU training |
+
+To use one of these, just pass the name to `--accelerate_config`. TRL will automatically load the corresponding config file from `trl/accelerate_config/`.
+
+#### Example Usage
+
+<hfoptions id="accelerate_config">
+<hfoption id="SFT inline">
+
+```bash
+trl sft \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name stanfordnlp/imdb \
+  --accelerate_config zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="SFT w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# sft_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: stanfordnlp/imdb
+accelerate_config: zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO inline">
+
+```bash
+trl dpo \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name anthropic/hh-rlhf \
+  --accelerate_config zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# dpo_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: anthropic/hh-rlhf
+accelerate_config: zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward inline">
+
+```bash
+trl reward \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+  --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
+  --accelerate_config zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward w/ config file">
+
+```yaml
+# reward_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+dataset_name: trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+accelerate_config: zero2  # or path/to/my/accelerate/config.yaml
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### Using dataset mixtures
+
+You can use dataset mixtures to combine multiple datasets into a single training dataset. This is useful for training on diverse data sources or when you want to mix different types of data.
+
+<hfoptions id="dataset_mixtures">
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+```yaml
+# sft_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+datasets:
+  - path: stanfordnlp/imdb
+  - path: roneneldan/TinyStories
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl sft --config sft_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+```yaml
+# dpo_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+datasets:
+  - path: BAAI/Infinity-Preference
+  - path: argilla/Capybara-Preferences
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl dpo --config dpo_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Reward">
+
+```yaml
+# reward_config.yaml
+model_name_or_path: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B
+datasets:
+  - path: trl-lib/tldr-preference
+  - path: trl-lib/lm-human-preferences-sentiment
+```
+
+Launch with:
+
+```bash
+trl reward --config reward_config.yaml
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+To see all the available keywords for defining dataset mixtures, refer to the [`scripts.utils.DatasetConfig`] and [`DatasetMixtureConfig`] classes.
+
+## Getting the System Information
+
+You can get the system information by running the following command:
+
+```bash
+trl env
+```
+
+This will print out the system information, including the GPU information, the CUDA version, the PyTorch version, the transformers version, the TRL version, and any optional dependencies that are installed.
+
+```txt
+Copy-paste the following information when reporting an issue:
+
+- Platform: Linux-5.15.0-1048-aws-x86_64-with-glibc2.31
+- Python version: 3.11.9
+- PyTorch version: 2.4.1
+- accelerator(s): NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3
+- Transformers version: 4.45.0.dev0
+- Accelerate version: 0.34.2
+- Accelerate config: 
+  - compute_environment: LOCAL_MACHINE
+  - distributed_type: DEEPSPEED
+  - mixed_precision: no
+  - use_cpu: False
+  - debug: False
+  - num_processes: 4
+  - machine_rank: 0
+  - num_machines: 1
+  - rdzv_backend: static
+  - same_network: True
+  - main_training_function: main
+  - enable_cpu_affinity: False
+  - deepspeed_config: {'gradient_accumulation_steps': 4, 'offload_optimizer_device': 'none', 'offload_param_device': 'none', 'zero3_init_flag': False, 'zero_stage': 2}
+  - downcast_bf16: no
+  - tpu_use_cluster: False
+  - tpu_use_sudo: False
+  - tpu_env: []
+- Datasets version: 3.0.0
+- HF Hub version: 0.24.7
+- TRL version: 0.12.0.dev0+acb4d70
+- bitsandbytes version: 0.41.1
+- DeepSpeed version: 0.15.1
+- Diffusers version: 0.30.3
+- Liger-Kernel version: 0.3.0
+- LLM-Blender version: 0.0.2
+- OpenAI version: 1.46.0
+- PEFT version: 0.12.0
+- vLLM version: not installed
+```
+
+This information is required when reporting an issue.

docs/source/community_tutorials.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Community Tutorials
+
+Community tutorials are made by active members of the Hugging Face community who want to share their knowledge and expertise with others. They are a great way to learn about the library and its features, and to get started with core classes and modalities.
+
+## Language Models
+
+### Tutorials
+
+| Task | Class | Description | Author | Tutorial | Colab |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Efficient Online Training with GRPO and vLLM in TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/grpo_vllm_online_training) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/grpo_vllm_online_training.ipynb) |
+| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Post training an LLM for reasoning with GRPO in TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_llm_grpo_trl) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_llm_grpo_trl.ipynb) |
+| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Mini-R1: Reproduce Deepseek R1 „aha moment“ a RL tutorial | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/mini-deepseek-r1) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/mini-deepseek-r1-aha-grpo.ipynb) |
+| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | RL on LLaMA 3.1-8B with GRPO and Unsloth optimizations | [Andrea Manzoni](https://huggingface.co/AManzoni) | [Link](https://colab.research.google.com/github/amanzoni1/fine_tuning/blob/main/RL_LLama3_1_8B_GRPO.ipynb) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/amanzoni1/fine_tuning/blob/main/RL_LLama3_1_8B_GRPO.ipynb) | 
+| Instruction tuning | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Google Gemma LLMs using ChatML format with QLoRA | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-google-gemma) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/gemma-lora-example.ipynb) |
+| Structured Generation | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Llama-2-7B to generate Persian product catalogs in JSON using QLoRA and PEFT | [Mohammadreza Esmaeilian](https://huggingface.co/Mohammadreza) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/en/fine_tuning_llm_to_generate_persian_product_catalogs_in_json_format) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_llm_to_generate_persian_product_catalogs_in_json_format.ipynb) |
+| Preference Optimization | [`DPOTrainer`] | Align Mistral-7b using Direct Preference Optimization for human preference alignment | [Maxime Labonne](https://huggingface.co/mlabonne) | [Link](https://mlabonne.github.io/blog/posts/Fine_tune_Mistral_7b_with_DPO.html) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/mlabonne/llm-course/blob/main/Fine_tune_a_Mistral_7b_model_with_DPO.ipynb) |
+| Preference Optimization | [`ORPOTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Llama 3 with ORPO combining instruction tuning and preference alignment | [Maxime Labonne](https://huggingface.co/mlabonne) | [Link](https://mlabonne.github.io/blog/posts/2024-04-19_Fine_tune_Llama_3_with_ORPO.html) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1eHNWg9gnaXErdAa8_mcvjMupbSS6rDvi) |
+| Instruction tuning | [`SFTTrainer`] | How to fine-tune open LLMs in 2025 with Hugging Face | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-llms-in-2025) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/fine-tune-llms-in-2025.ipynb) |
+
+### Videos
+
+| Task | Title | Author | Video |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Instruction tuning | Fine-tuning open AI models using Hugging Face TRL | [Wietse Venema](https://huggingface.co/wietsevenema) | [<img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/cnGyyM0vOes/0.jpg">](https://youtu.be/cnGyyM0vOes) |
+| Instruction tuning | How to fine-tune a smol-LM with Hugging Face, TRL, and the smoltalk Dataset | [Mayurji](https://huggingface.co/iammayur) | [<img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/jKdXv3BiLu0/0.jpg">](https://youtu.be/jKdXv3BiLu0) |
+
+
+<details>
+<summary>⚠️ Deprecated features notice for "How to fine-tune a smol-LM with Hugging Face, TRL, and the smoltalk Dataset" (click to expand)</summary>
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> The tutorial uses two deprecated features:
+>
+> - `SFTTrainer(..., tokenizer=tokenizer)`: Use `SFTTrainer(..., processing_class=tokenizer)` instead, or simply omit it (it will be inferred from the model).
+> - `setup_chat_format(model, tokenizer)`: Use `SFTConfig(..., chat_template_path="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B")`, where `chat_template_path` specifies the model whose chat template you want to copy.
+
+</details>
+
+## Vision Language Models
+
+### Tutorials
+
+| Task | Class | Description | Author | Tutorial | Colab |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Visual QA | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Qwen2-VL-7B for visual question answering on ChartQA dataset | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_trl) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_trl.ipynb) |
+| Visual QA | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning SmolVLM with TRL on a consumer GPU | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_smol_vlm_sft_trl) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_smol_vlm_sft_trl.ipynb) |
+| SEO Description | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine-tuning Qwen2-VL-7B for generating SEO-friendly descriptions from images | [Philipp Schmid](https://huggingface.co/philschmid) | [Link](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-multimodal-llms-with-trl) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/philschmid/deep-learning-pytorch-huggingface/blob/main/training/fine-tune-multimodal-llms-with-trl.ipynb) |
+| Visual QA | [`DPOTrainer`] | PaliGemma 🤝 Direct Preference Optimization | [Merve Noyan](https://huggingface.co/merve) | [Link](https://github.com/merveenoyan/smol-vision/blob/main/PaliGemma_DPO.ipynb) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/merveenoyan/smol-vision/blob/main/PaliGemma_DPO.ipynb) |
+| Visual QA | [`DPOTrainer`] | Fine-tuning SmolVLM using direct preference optimization (DPO) with TRL on a consumer GPU | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_dpo_smolvlm_instruct) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_dpo_smolvlm_instruct.ipynb) |
+| Object Detection Grounding | [`SFTTrainer`] | Fine tuning a VLM for Object Detection Grounding using TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_object_detection_grounding) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_object_detection_grounding.ipynb) |
+| Visual QA | [`DPOTrainer`] | Fine-Tuning a Vision Language Model with TRL using MPO | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_mpo) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_mpo.ipynb) |
+| Reinforcement Learning | [`GRPOTrainer`] | Post training a VLM for reasoning with GRPO using TRL | [Sergio Paniego](https://huggingface.co/sergiopaniego) | [Link](https://huggingface.co/learn/cookbook/fine_tuning_vlm_grpo_trl) | [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/cookbook/blob/main/notebooks/en/fine_tuning_vlm_grpo_trl.ipynb) |
+
+## Contributing
+
+If you have a tutorial that you would like to add to this list, please open a PR to add it. We will review it and merge it if it is relevant to the community.

docs/source/cpo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# CPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-CPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=cpo,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+Contrastive Preference Optimization (CPO) as introduced in the paper [Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation](https://huggingface.co/papers/2401.08417) by [Haoran Xu](https://huggingface.co/haoranxu), [Amr Sharaf](https://huggingface.co/amrsharaf), [Yunmo Chen](https://huggingface.co/yunmochen), Weiting Tan, Lingfeng Shen, Benjamin Van Durme, [Kenton Murray](https://huggingface.co/Kenton), and [Young Jin Kim](https://huggingface.co/ykim362). At a high level, CPO trains models to avoid generating adequate, but not perfect, translations in Machine Translation (MT) tasks. However, CPO is a general approximation of the DPO loss and can be applied to other domains, such as chat.
+
+CPO aims to mitigate two fundamental shortcomings of SFT. First, SFT’s methodology of minimizing the discrepancy between predicted outputs and gold-standard references inherently caps model performance at the quality level of the training data. Secondly, SFT lacks a mechanism to prevent the model from rejecting mistakes in translations. The CPO objective is derived from the DPO objective.
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the CPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_cpo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import CPOConfig, CPOTrainer
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+training_args = CPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-CPO")
+trainer = CPOTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_cpo.py
+```
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+CPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`CPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the CPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/cpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/cpo.py)
+
+To test the CPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch examples/scripts/cpo.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-CPO
+```
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+* `rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
+* `rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
+* `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
+* `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
+* `nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss of the policy model for the chosen responses
+
+## CPO variants
+
+### Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO)
+
+[Simple Preference Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.14734) (SimPO) by [Yu Meng](https://huggingface.co/yumeng5), [Mengzhou Xia](https://huggingface.co/mengzhouxia), and [Danqi Chen](https://huggingface.co/cdq10131) proposes a simpler and more effective preference optimization algorithm than DPO without using a reference model. The key designs in SimPO are (1) using length-normalized log likelihood as the implicit reward, and (2) incorporating a target reward margin in the Bradley-Terry ranking objective. The official code can be found at [princeton-nlp/SimPO](https://github.com/princeton-nlp/SimPO).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a widely used offline preference optimization algorithm that reparameterizes reward functions in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to enhance simplicity and training stability. In this work, we propose SimPO, a simpler yet more effective approach. The effectiveness of SimPO is attributed to a key design: using the average log probability of a sequence as the implicit reward. This reward formulation better aligns with model generation and eliminates the need for a reference model, making it more compute and memory efficient. Additionally, we introduce a target reward margin to the Bradley-Terry objective to encourage a larger margin between the winning and losing responses, further enhancing the algorithm's performance. We compare SimPO to DPO and its latest variants across various state-of-the-art training setups, including both base and instruction-tuned models like Mistral and Llama3. We evaluated on extensive instruction-following benchmarks, including AlpacaEval 2, MT-Bench, and the recent challenging Arena-Hard benchmark. Our results demonstrate that SimPO consistently and significantly outperforms existing approaches without substantially increasing response length. Specifically, SimPO outperforms DPO by up to 6.4 points on AlpacaEval 2 and by up to 7.5 points on Arena-Hard. Our top-performing model, built on Llama3-8B-Instruct, achieves a remarkable 44.7 length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2 -- surpassing Claude 3 Opus on the leaderboard, and a 33.8 win rate on Arena-Hard -- making it the strongest 8B open-source model.
+
+The SimPO loss is integrated in the [`CPOTrainer`], as it's an alternative loss that adds a reward margin, allows for length normalization, and does not use BC regularization. To use this loss, just turn on `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0` in the [`CPOConfig`] and set the `simpo_gamma` to a recommended value.
+
+### CPO-SimPO
+
+We also offer the combined use of CPO and SimPO, which enables more stable training and improved performance. Learn more details at [CPO-SimPO GitHub](https://github.com/fe1ixxu/CPO_SIMPO). To use this method, simply enable SimPO by setting `loss_type="simpo"` and a non-zero `cpo_alpha` in the [`CPOConfig`].
+
+### AlphaPO
+
+The [AlphaPO -- Reward shape matters for LLM alignment](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03884) (AlphaPO) method by Aman Gupta, Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, [Jiwoo Hong](https://huggingface.co/JW17), Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Jason Zhu, Natesh Pillai, and S. Sathiya Keerthi is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. AlphaPO is an alternative method that applies a transformation to the reward function shape in the context of SimPO loss. The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an α-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and overoptimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance.
+
+To use this loss as described in the paper, we can set the `loss_type="alphapo"` which automatically sets `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0`, together with `alpha` and `simpo_gamma` to recommended values in the [`CPOConfig`]. Alternatively, you can manually set `loss_type="simpo"`, `cpo_alpha=0.0`, together with `alpha` and `simpo_gamma` to recommended values. Other variants of this method are also possible, such as setting `loss_type="ipo"` and `alpha` to any non-zero value.
+
+## Loss functions
+
+The CPO algorithm supports several loss functions. The loss function can be set using the `loss_type` parameter in the [`CPOConfig`]. The following loss functions are supported:
+
+| `loss_type=` | Description |
+| --- | --- |
+| `"sigmoid"` (default) | Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model, and in fact, the [DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression. |
+| `"hinge"` | The [RSO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425) paper. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the margin. |
+| `"ipo"` | The [IPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair, and thus the smaller the `beta`, the larger this gap is. As per the paper, the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike DPO, which is summed only). |
+| `"simpo"` | The [SimPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.14734) method is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. SimPO is an alternative loss that adds a reward margin, allows for length normalization, and does not use BC regularization. To use this loss, simply set `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0` in the [`CPOConfig`] and `simpo_gamma` to a recommended value. |
+| `"alphapo"` | The [AlphaPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03884) method is also implemented in the [`CPOTrainer`]. This is syntactic sugar that automatically sets `loss_type="simpo"` and `cpo_alpha=0.0`. AlphaPO applies a transformation to the reward function shape in the context of SimPO loss when the `alpha` parameter is non-zero. |
+
+### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
+
+MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.  
+To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
+
+This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g., [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).  
+To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
+
+## CPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] CPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## CPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] CPOConfig

docs/source/customization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+# Training customization
+
+TRL is designed with modularity in mind so that users are able to efficiently customize the training loop for their needs. Below are some examples on how you can apply and test different techniques.  Note: Although these examples use the DPOTrainer, the customization applies to most (if not all) trainers.
+
+## Use different optimizers and schedulers
+
+By default, the `DPOTrainer` creates a `torch.optim.AdamW` optimizer. You can create and define a different optimizer and pass it to `DPOTrainer` as follows:
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+from torch import optim
+from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO")
+
+optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=training_args.learning_rate)
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    tokenizer=tokenizer,
+    optimizers=(optimizer, None),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### Add a learning rate scheduler
+
+You can also play with your training by adding learning rate schedulers.
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+from torch import optim
+from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO")
+
+optimizer = optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=training_args.learning_rate)
+lr_scheduler = optim.lr_scheduler.StepLR(optimizer, step_size=30, gamma=0.1)
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    tokenizer=tokenizer,
+    optimizers=(optimizer, lr_scheduler),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+## Memory efficient fine-tuning by sharing layers
+
+Another tool you can use for more memory efficient fine-tuning is to share layers between the reference model and the model you want to train.
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+from trl import create_reference_model, DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+ref_model = create_reference_model(model, num_shared_layers=6)
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train[:1%]")
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO")
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    ref_model=ref_model,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    tokenizer=tokenizer,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+## Pass 8-bit reference models
+
+Since `trl` supports all keyword arguments when loading a model from `transformers` using `from_pretrained`, you can also leverage `load_in_8bit` from `transformers` for more memory efficient fine-tuning.
+
+Read more about 8-bit model loading in `transformers` [Load in 8bit or 4bit](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/en/peft#load-in-8bit-or-4bit).
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, BitsAndBytesConfig
+from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True)
+ref_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct", quantization_config= quantization_config)
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO")
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    ref_model=ref_model,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    tokenizer=tokenizer,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+## Use the accelerator cache optimizer
+
+When training large models, you should better handle the accelerator cache by iteratively clearing it. To do so, simply pass `optimize_device_cache=True` to [`DPOConfig`]:
+
+```python
+training_args = DPOConfig(..., optimize_device_cache=True)
+```

docs/source/customization.mdx

@@ -1,216 +0,0 @@
-# Training customization
-
-TRL is designed with modularity in mind so that users to be able to efficiently customize the training loop for their needs. Below are some examples on how you can apply and test different techniques.
-
-## Train on multiple GPUs / nodes
-
-The trainers in TRL use 🤗 Accelerate to enable distributed training across multiple GPUs or nodes. To do so, first create an 🤗 Accelerate config file by running
-
-```bash
-accelerate config
-```
-
-and answering the questions according to your multi-gpu / multi-node setup. You can then launch distributed training by running:
-
-```bash
-accelerate launch your_script.py
-```
-
-We also provide config files in the [examples folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) that can be used as templates. To use these templates, simply pass the path to the config file when launching a job, e.g.:
-
-```shell
-accelerate launch --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/multi_gpu.yaml --num_processes {NUM_GPUS} path_to_script.py --all_arguments_of_the_script
-```
-
-Refer to the [examples page](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples) for more details.
-
-### Distributed training with DeepSpeed
-
-All of the trainers in TRL can be run on multiple GPUs together with DeepSpeed ZeRO-{1,2,3} for efficient sharding of the optimizer states, gradients, and model weights. To do so, run:
-
-```shell
-accelerate launch --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero{1,2,3}.yaml --num_processes {NUM_GPUS} path_to_your_script.py --all_arguments_of_the_script
-```
-
-Note that for ZeRO-3, a small tweak is needed to initialize your reward model on the correct device via the `zero3_init_context_manager()` context manager. In particular, this is needed to avoid DeepSpeed hanging after a fixed number of training steps. Here is a snippet of what is involved from the [`sentiment_tuning`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo.py) example:
-
-```python
-ds_plugin = ppo_trainer.accelerator.state.deepspeed_plugin
-if ds_plugin is not None and ds_plugin.is_zero3_init_enabled():
-    with ds_plugin.zero3_init_context_manager(enable=False):
-        sentiment_pipe = pipeline("sentiment-analysis", model="lvwerra/distilbert-imdb", device=device)
-else:
-    sentiment_pipe = pipeline("sentiment-analysis", model="lvwerra/distilbert-imdb", device=device)
-```
-
-Consult the 🤗 Accelerate [documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/usage_guides/deepspeed) for more information about the DeepSpeed plugin.
-
-
-## Use different optimizers
-
-By default, the `PPOTrainer` creates a `torch.optim.Adam` optimizer. You can create and define a different optimizer and pass it to `PPOTrainer`:
-```python
-import torch
-from transformers import GPT2Tokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-model_ref = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-
-# 2. define config
-ppo_config = {'batch_size': 1, 'learning_rate':1e-5}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-
-
-# 2. Create optimizer
-optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=config.learning_rate)
-
-
-# 3. initialize trainer
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer, optimizer=optimizer)
-```
-
-For memory efficient fine-tuning, you can also pass `Adam8bit` optimizer from `bitsandbytes`:
-
-```python
-import torch
-import bitsandbytes as bnb
-
-from transformers import GPT2Tokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-model_ref = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-
-# 2. define config
-ppo_config = {'batch_size': 1, 'learning_rate':1e-5}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-
-
-# 2. Create optimizer
-optimizer = bnb.optim.Adam8bit(model.parameters(), lr=config.learning_rate)
-
-# 3. initialize trainer
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer, optimizer=optimizer)
-```
-
-### Use LION optimizer
-
-You can use the new [LION optimizer from Google](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06675) as well, first take the source code of the optimizer definition [here](https://github.com/lucidrains/lion-pytorch/blob/main/lion_pytorch/lion_pytorch.py), and copy it so that you can import the optimizer. Make sure to initialize the optimizer by considering the trainable parameters only for a more memory efficient training:
-```python
-optimizer = Lion(filter(lambda p: p.requires_grad, self.model.parameters()), lr=self.config.learning_rate)
-
-...
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer, optimizer=optimizer)
-```
-We advise you to use the learning rate that you would use for `Adam` divided by 3 as pointed out [here](https://github.com/lucidrains/lion-pytorch#lion---pytorch). We observed an improvement when using this optimizer compared to classic Adam (check the full logs [here](https://wandb.ai/distill-bloom/trl/runs/lj4bheke?workspace=user-younesbelkada)):
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-lion.png">
-</div>
-
-
-## Add a learning rate scheduler
-
-You can also play with your training by adding learning rate schedulers!
-```python
-import torch
-from transformers import GPT2Tokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-model_ref = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained('gpt2')
-
-# 2. define config
-ppo_config = {'batch_size': 1, 'learning_rate':1e-5}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-
-
-# 2. Create optimizer
-optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=config.learning_rate)
-lr_scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.ExponentialLR(optimizer, gamma=0.9)
-
-# 3. initialize trainer
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer, optimizer=optimizer, lr_scheduler=lr_scheduler)
-```
-
-## Memory efficient fine-tuning by sharing layers
-
-Another tool you can use for more memory efficient fine-tuning is to share layers between the reference model and the model you want to train.
-```python
-import torch
-from transformers import AutoTokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead, create_reference_model
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m')
-model_ref = create_reference_model(model, num_shared_layers=6)
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m')
-
-# 2. initialize trainer
-ppo_config = {'batch_size': 1}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer)
-```
-
-## Pass 8-bit reference models 
- 
-<div>
-
-Since `trl` supports all key word arguments when loading a model from `transformers` using `from_pretrained`, you can also leverage `load_in_8bit` from `transformers` for more memory efficient fine-tuning.
-
-Read more about 8-bit model loading in `transformers` [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/perf_infer_gpu_one#bitsandbytes-integration-for-int8-mixedprecision-matrix-decomposition).
-
-</div>
-
-```python
-# 0. imports
-# pip install bitsandbytes
-import torch
-from transformers import AutoTokenizer
-from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig, AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m')
-model_ref = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m', device_map="auto", load_in_8bit=True)
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('bigscience/bloom-560m')
-
-# 2. initialize trainer
-ppo_config = {'batch_size': 1}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer)
-```
-
-## Use the CUDA cache optimizer
-
-When training large models, you should better handle the CUDA cache by iteratively clearing it. Do do so, simply pass `optimize_cuda_cache=True` to `PPOConfig`:
-
-```python
-config = PPOConfig(..., optimize_cuda_cache=True)
-```
-
-
-
-## Use score scaling/normalization/clipping
-As suggested by [Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04964), we support score (aka reward) scaling/normalization/clipping to improve training stability via `PPOConfig`:
-```python
-from trl import PPOConfig
-
-ppo_config = {
-    use_score_scaling=True,
-    use_score_norm=True,
-    score_clip=0.5,
-}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-```
-
-To run `ppo.py`, you can use the following command:
-```
-python examples/scripts/ppo.py --log_with wandb --use_score_scaling --use_score_norm --score_clip 0.5
-```

docs/source/data_utils.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Data Utilities
+
+## prepare_multimodal_messages
+
+[[autodoc]] prepare_multimodal_messages
+
+## is_conversational
+
+[[autodoc]] is_conversational
+
+## is_conversational_from_value
+
+[[autodoc]] is_conversational_from_value
+
+## apply_chat_template
+
+[[autodoc]] apply_chat_template
+
+## maybe_apply_chat_template
+
+[[autodoc]] maybe_apply_chat_template
+
+## maybe_convert_to_chatml
+
+[[autodoc]] maybe_convert_to_chatml
+
+## extract_prompt
+
+[[autodoc]] extract_prompt
+
+## maybe_extract_prompt
+
+[[autodoc]] maybe_extract_prompt
+
+## unpair_preference_dataset
+
+[[autodoc]] unpair_preference_dataset
+
+## maybe_unpair_preference_dataset
+
+[[autodoc]] maybe_unpair_preference_dataset
+
+## pack_dataset
+
+[[autodoc]] pack_dataset
+
+## truncate_dataset
+
+[[autodoc]] truncate_dataset

docs/source/ddpo_trainer.mdx

@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-# Denoising Diffusion Policy Optimization
-## The why
-
-| Before | After DDPO finetuning |
-| --- | --- |
-| <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/pre_squirrel.png"/></div> |  <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/post_squirrel.png"/></div> |
-| <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/pre_crab.png"/></div> |  <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/post_crab.png"/></div> |
-|  <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/pre_starfish.png"/></div> |  <div style="text-align: center"><img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/post_starfish.png"/></div> |
-
-
-## Getting started with Stable Diffusion finetuning with reinforcement learning
-
-The machinery for finetuning of Stable Diffusion models with reinforcement learning makes heavy use of HuggingFace's `diffusers`
-library. A reason for  stating this is that getting started requires a bit of familiarity with the `diffusers` library concepts, mainly two of them - pipelines and schedulers.
-Right out of the box (`diffusers` library), there isn't a `Pipeline` nor a `Scheduler` instance that is suitable for finetuning with reinforcement learning. Some adjustments need to made. 
-
-There is a pipeline interface that is provided by this library that is required to be implemented to be used with the `DDPOTrainer`, which is the main machinery for fine-tuning Stable Diffusion with reinforcement learning. **Note: Only the StableDiffusion architecture is supported at this point.**
-There is a default implementation of this interface that you can use out of the box. Assuming the default implementation is sufficient and/or to get things moving, refer to the training example alongside this guide. 
-
-The point of the interface is to fuse the pipeline and the scheduler into one object which allows for minimalness in terms of having the constraints all in one place. The interface was designed in hopes of catering to pipelines and schedulers beyond the examples in this repository and elsewhere at this time of writing. Also the scheduler step is a method of this pipeline interface and this may seem redundant given that the raw scheduler is accessible via the interface but this is the only way to constrain the scheduler step output to an output type befitting of the algorithm at hand (DDPO).
-
-For a more detailed look into the interface and the associated default implementation, go [here](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/tree/main/trl/models/modeling_sd_base.py)
-
-Note that the default implementation has a LoRA implementation path and a non-LoRA based implementation path. The LoRA flag enabled by default and this can be turned off by passing in the flag to do so. LORA based training is faster and the LORA associated model hyperparameters responsible for model convergence aren't as finicky as non-LORA based training.
-
-Also in addition, there is the expectation of providing a reward function and a prompt function. The reward function is used to evaluate the generated images  and the prompt function is used to generate the prompts that are used to generate the images.
-
-## Getting started with `examples/scripts/ddpo.py`
-
-The `ddpo.py` script is a working example of using the `DDPO` trainer to finetune a Stable Diffusion model. This example explicitly configures a small subset of the overall parameters associated with the config object (`DDPOConfig`).
-
-**Note:** one A100 GPU is recommended to get this running. Anything below a A100 will not be able to run this example script and even if it does via relatively smaller sized parameters, the results will most likely be poor.
-
-Almost every configuration parameter has a default. There is only one commandline flag argument that is required of the user to get things up and running. The user is expected to have a [huggingface user access token](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/security-tokens) that will be used to upload the model post finetuning to HuggingFace hub. The following bash command is to be entered to get things running
-
-```batch
-python ddpo.py --hf_user_access_token <token>
-```
-
-To obtain the documentation of `stable_diffusion_tuning.py`, please run `python stable_diffusion_tuning.py --help`
-
-The following are things to keep in mind (The code checks this for you as well) in general while configuring the trainer (beyond the use case of using the example script)
-
-- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) should be greater than or equal to the configurable training batch size (`--ddpo_config.train_batch_size=3`)
-- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) must be divisible by the configurable train batch size (`--ddpo_config.train_batch_size=3`)
-- The configurable sample batch size (`--ddpo_config.sample_batch_size=6`) must be divisible by both the configurable gradient accumulation steps (`--ddpo_config.train_gradient_accumulation_steps=1`) and the configurable accelerator processes count 
-
-## Setting up the image logging hook function
-
-Expect the function to be given a list of lists of the form
-```python
-[[image, prompt, prompt_metadata, rewards, reward_metadata], ...]
-
-```
-and `image`, `prompt`, `prompt_metadata`, `rewards`, `reward_metadata` are batched.
-The last list in the lists of lists represents the last sample batch. You are likely to want to log this one
-While you are free to log however you want the use of `wandb` or `tensorboard` is recommended.
-
-### Key terms
-
-- `rewards` : The rewards/score is a numerical associated with the generated image and is key to steering the RL process
-- `reward_metadata` : The reward metadata is the metadata associated with the reward. Think of this as extra information payload delivered alongside the reward
-- `prompt` : The prompt is the text that is used to generate the image
-- `prompt_metadata` : The prompt metadata is the metadata associated with the prompt. A situation where this will not be empty is when the reward model comprises of a [`FLAVA`](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/flava) setup where questions and ground answers (linked to the generated image) are expected with the generated image (See here: https://github.com/kvablack/ddpo-pytorch/blob/main/ddpo_pytorch/rewards.py#L45)
-- `image` : The image generated by the Stable Diffusion model
-
-Example code for logging sampled images with `wandb` is given below.
-
-```python
-# for logging these images to wandb
-
-def image_outputs_hook(image_data, global_step, accelerate_logger):
-    # For the sake of this example, we only care about the last batch
-    # hence we extract the last element of the list
-    result = {}
-    images, prompts, _, rewards, _ = image_data[-1]
-    for i, image in enumerate(images):
-        pil = Image.fromarray(
-            (image.cpu().numpy().transpose(1, 2, 0) * 255).astype(np.uint8)
-        )
-        pil = pil.resize((256, 256))
-        result[f"{prompts[i]:.25} | {rewards[i]:.2f}"] = [pil]
-    accelerate_logger.log_images(
-        result,
-        step=global_step,
-    )
-
-```
-
-### Using the finetuned model
-
-Assuming you've done with all the epochs and have pushed up your model to the hub, you can use the finetuned model as follows
-
-```python
-
-import torch
-from trl import DefaultDDPOStableDiffusionPipeline
-
-pipeline = DefaultDDPOStableDiffusionPipeline("metric-space/ddpo-finetuned-sd-model")
-
-device = torch.device("cuda") if torch.cuda.is_available() else torch.device("cpu")
-
-# memory optimization
-pipeline.vae.to(device, torch.float16)
-pipeline.text_encoder.to(device, torch.float16)
-pipeline.unet.to(device, torch.float16)
-
-prompts = ["squirrel", "crab", "starfish", "whale","sponge", "plankton"]
-results = pipeline(prompts)
-
-for prompt, image in zip(prompts,results.images):
-    image.save(f"{prompt}.png")
-
-```
-
-## Credits
-
-This work is heavily influenced by the repo [here](https://github.com/kvablack/ddpo-pytorch) and the associated paper [Training Diffusion Models
-with Reinforcement Learning by Kevin Black, Michael Janner, Yilan Du, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey Levine](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13301).

docs/source/deepspeed_integration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# DeepSpeed Integration
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
+
+TRL supports training with DeepSpeed, a library that implements advanced training optimization techniques. These include optimizer state partitioning, offloading, gradient partitioning, and more.
+
+DeepSpeed integrates the [Zero Redundancy Optimizer (ZeRO)](https://huggingface.co/papers/1910.02054), which allows to scale the model size proportional to the number of devices with sustained high efficiency.
+
+![ZeRO Stages](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/zero_stages.png)
+
+## Installation
+
+To use DeepSpeed with TRL, install it using the following command:
+
+```bash
+pip install deepspeed
+```
+
+## Running Training Scripts with DeepSpeed
+
+No modifications to your training script are required. Simply run it with the DeepSpeed configuration file:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch --config_file <ACCELERATE_WITH_DEEPSPEED_CONFIG_FILE.yaml> train.py
+```
+
+We provide ready-to-use DeepSpeed configuration files in the [`examples/accelerate_configs`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) directory. For example, to run training with ZeRO Stage 2, use the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero2.yaml train.py
+```
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+Consult the 🤗 Accelerate [documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/usage_guides/deepspeed) for more information about the DeepSpeed plugin.

docs/source/detoxifying_a_lm.mdx

@@ -1,191 +0,0 @@
-# Detoxifying a Language Model using PPO
-
-Language models (LMs) are known to sometimes generate toxic outputs. In this example, we will show how to "detoxify" a LM by feeding it toxic prompts and then using [Transformer Reinforcement Learning (TRL)](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to "detoxify" it.
-
-Read this section to follow our investigation on how we can reduce toxicity in a wide range of LMs, from 125m parameters to 6B parameters! 
-
-Here's an overview of the notebooks and scripts in the [TRL toxicity repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/toxicity/scripts) as well as the link for the interactive demo:
-
-| File | Description | Colab link |
-|---|---| --- |
-| [`gpt-j-6b-toxicity.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/gpt-j-6b-toxicity.py) | Detoxify `GPT-J-6B` using PPO | x | 
-| [`evaluate-toxicity.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/evaluate-toxicity.py) | Evaluate de-toxified models using `evaluate` | x | 
-| [Interactive Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/detoxified-lms)| An interactive Space that you can use to compare the original model with its detoxified version!| x |
-
-## Context
-
-Language models are trained on large volumes of text from the internet which also includes a lot of toxic content. Naturally,  language models pick up the toxic patterns during training. Especially when prompted with already toxic texts the models are likely to continue the generations in a toxic way. The goal here is to "force" the model to be less toxic by feeding it toxic prompts and then using PPO to "detoxify" it.
-
-### Computing toxicity scores
-
-In order to optimize a model with PPO we need to define a reward. For this use-case we want a negative reward whenever the model generates something toxic and a positive comment when it is not toxic.
-Therefore, we used [`facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target`](https://huggingface.co/facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target), which is a RoBERTa model fine-tuned to classify between "neutral" and "toxic" text as our toxic prompts classifier.
-One could have also used different techniques to evaluate the toxicity of a model, or combined different toxicity classifiers, but for simplicity we have chosen to use this one.
-
-### Selection of models
-
-We selected the following models for our experiments to show that TRL can be easily scaled to 10B parameters models: 
-
-* [`EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M`](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M) (125 million parameters)
-* [`EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B`](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B) (2.7 billion parameters)
-* [`EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B`](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B) (6 billion parameters)
-
-For the selection of the smallest model, we have chosen `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M` because it has shown to be a model that was the "most toxic" compared to other models. We have ran toxicity evaluation using `facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target` model on 4 different architectures on a subset of `allenai/real-toxicity-prompts` dataset. Note that we have computed the toxicity score on the generated text only (thus ignoring the prompt).
-
-| Model | Mean toxicity score |
-|---|---| 
-| `gpt2` | 0.01602 |
-| `facebook/opt-350m` | 0.01628 |
-| `bigscience/bloom-560m` | 0.00767 |
-| `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125M` | **0.02016** |
-
-## Designing the problem
-
-When doing PPO, it is very important to design the problem efficiently so that the model can learn to solve it. Let's cover the topics that were important for the model to converge.
-
-### Pre-processing the dataset
-
-The dataset consist of prompts and their continuations, and each of them has an associated `toxicity` score.
-
-A `prompt` example:
-```
-{ "text": "Bronx officer Luis Rios alleged on-the-job tall tales were compounded by his lying about them in court, and", "profanity": 0.08360514, "sexually_explicit": 0.118823394, "identity_attack": 0.09608547, "flirtation": 0.23102224, "threat": 0.13215046, "insult": 0.10130461, "severe_toxicity": 0.04068885, "toxicity": 0.16534281 }
-```
-And its `continuation` value:
-```
-{ "text": " cost federal prosecutors all the drug evidence that the cop collected against an armed suspect — 16 baggies of cocaine during a strip search.", "severe_toxicity": 0.067997746, "toxicity": 0.1694093, "profanity": 0.11931301, "sexually_explicit": 0.12521537, "identity_attack": 0.09268324, "flirtation": 0.13452998, "threat": 0.31312028, "insult": 0.10761123 }
-```
-
-We want to increase the chance for the model to generate toxic prompts so we get more learning signal. For this reason pre-process the dataset to consider only the prompt that has a toxicity score that is greater than a threshold. We can do this in a few lines of code:
-```python
-ds = load_dataset("allenai/real-toxicity-prompts", split="train")
-
-def filter_fn(sample):
-    toxicity = sample["prompt"]["toxicity"]
-    return toxicity is not None and toxicity > 0.3
-
-ds = ds.filter(filter_fn, batched=False)
-```
-
-### Reward function
-
-The reward function is one of the most important part of training a model with reinforcement learning. It is the function that will tell the model if it is doing well or not.
-We tried various combinations, considering the softmax of the label "neutral", the log of the toxicity score and the raw logits of the label "neutral". We have found out that the convergence was much more smoother with the raw logits of the label "neutral".
-```python
-logits = toxicity_model(**toxicity_inputs).logits.float()
-rewards = (logits[:, 0]).tolist()
-```
-
-### Impact of input prompts length
-
-We have found out that training a model with small or long context (from 5 to 8 tokens for the small context and from 15 to 20 tokens for the long context) does not have any impact on the convergence of the model, however, when training the model with longer prompts, the model will tend to generate more toxic prompts. 
-As a compromise between the two we took for a context window of 10 to 15 tokens for the training.
-
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-long-vs-short-context.png">
-</div>
-
-### How to deal with OOM issues
-
-Our goal is to train models up to 6B parameters, which is about 24GB in float32! Here two tricks we use to be able to train a 6B model on a single 40GB-RAM GPU:
-
-- Use `bfloat16` precision: Simply load your model in `bfloat16` when calling `from_pretrained` and you can reduce the size of the model by 2:
-
-```python
-model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16)
-```
-
-and the optimizer will take care of computing the gradients in `bfloat16` precision. Note that this is a pure `bfloat16` training which is different from the mixed precision training. If one wants to train a model in mixed-precision, they should not load the model with `torch_dtype` and specify the mixed precision argument when calling `accelerate config`.
-
-- Use shared layers: Since PPO algorithm requires to have both the active and reference model to be on the same device, we have decided to use shared layers to reduce the memory footprint of the model. This can be achieved by just speifying `num_shared_layers` argument when creating a `PPOTrainer`:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-shared-layers.png">
-</div>
-
-```python
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(
-    model=model,
-    tokenizer=tokenizer,
-    num_shared_layers=4,
-    ...
-)
-```
-
-In the example above this means that the model have the 4 first layers frozen (i.e. since these layers are shared between the active model and the reference model).
-
-- One could have also applied gradient checkpointing to reduce the memory footprint of the model by calling `model.pretrained_model.enable_gradient_checkpointing()` (although this has the downside of training being ~20% slower).
-
-## Training the model!
-
-We have decided to keep 3 models in total that correspond to our best models:
-
-- [`ybelkada/gpt-neo-125m-detox`](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada/gpt-neo-125m-detox)
-- [`ybelkada/gpt-neo-2.7B-detox`](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada/gpt-neo-2.7B-detox)
-- [`ybelkada/gpt-j-6b-detox`](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada/gpt-j-6b-detox)
-
-We have used different learning rates for each model, and have found out that the largest models were quite hard to train and can easily lead to collapse mode if the learning rate is not chosen correctly (i.e. if the learning rate is too high):
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-collapse-mode.png">
-</div>
-
-The final training run of `ybelkada/gpt-j-6b-detoxified-20shdl` looks like this:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-gpt-j-final-run-2.png">
-</div>
-
-As you can see the model converges nicely, but obviously we don't observe a very large improvement from the first step, as the original model is not trained to generate toxic contents. 
-
-Also we have observed that training with larger `mini_batch_size` leads to smoother convergence and better results on the test set:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-gpt-j-mbs-run.png">
-</div>
-
-## Results
-
-We tested our models on a new dataset, the [`OxAISH-AL-LLM/wiki_toxic`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/OxAISH-AL-LLM/wiki_toxic) dataset. We feed each model with a toxic prompt from it (a sample with the label "toxic"), and generate 30 new tokens as it is done on the training loop and measure the toxicity score using `evaluate`'s [`toxicity` metric](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/toxicity).
-We report the toxicity score of 400 sampled examples, compute its mean and standard deviation and report the results in the table below:
-
-| Model | Mean toxicity score | Std toxicity score |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125m` | 0.1627 | 0.2997 |
-| `ybelkada/gpt-neo-125m-detox` | **0.1148** | **0.2506** |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B` | 0.1884 | ,0.3178 |
-| `ybelkada/gpt-neo-2.7B-detox` | **0.0916** | **0.2104** |
-| --- | --- | --- |
-| `EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B` | 0.1699 | 0.3033 |
-| `ybelkada/gpt-j-6b-detox` | **0.1510** | **0.2798** |
-
-<div class="column" style="text-align:center">
-  <figure>
-    <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-final-barplot.png" style="width:80%">
-    <figcaption>Toxicity score with respect to the size of the model.</figcaption>
-  </figure>
-</div>
-
-Below are few generation examples of `gpt-j-6b-detox` model:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-toxicity-examples.png">
-</div>
-
-The evaluation script can be found [here](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/toxicity/scripts/evaluate-toxicity.py).
-
-### Discussions
-
-The results are quite promising, as we can see that the models are able to reduce the toxicity score of the generated text by an interesting margin. The gap is clear for `gpt-neo-2B` model but we less so for the `gpt-j-6B` model. There are several things we could try to improve the results on the largest model starting with training with larger `mini_batch_size` and probably allowing to back-propagate through more layers (i.e. use less shared layers).
-
-To sum up, in addition to human feedback this could be a useful additional signal when training large language models to ensure there outputs are less toxic as well as useful.
-
-### Limitations
-
-We are also aware of consistent bias issues reported with toxicity classifiers, and of work evaluating the negative impact of toxicity reduction on the diversity of outcomes. We recommend that future work also compare the outputs of the detoxified models in terms of fairness and diversity before putting them to use.
-
-## What is next?
-
-You can download the model and use it out of the box with `transformers`, or play with the Spaces that compares the output of the models before and after detoxification [here](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/detoxified-lms).

docs/source/distributing_training.md

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+# Distributing Training
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
+
+## Multi-GPU Training with TRL
+
+The trainers in TRL use [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) to enable distributed training across multiple GPUs or nodes. To do so, first create an [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) config file by running
+
+```bash
+accelerate config
+```
+
+and answering the questions according to your multi-GPU / multi-node setup. You can then launch distributed training by running:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train.py
+```
+
+We also provide config files in the [examples folder](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/accelerate_configs) that can be used as templates. To use these templates, simply pass the path to the config file when launching a job, e.g.:
+
+```shell
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/multi_gpu.yaml train.py <SCRIPT_ARGS>
+```
+
+This automatically distributes the workload across all available GPUs.
+
+Under the hood, [🤗 Accelerate](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate) creates one model per GPU. Each process:
+
+- Processes its own batch of data
+- Computes the loss and gradients for that batch
+- Shares gradient updates across all GPUs
+
+![multi gpu](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/multi_gpu.png)
+
+The effective batch size is calculated as:
+
+$$
+\text{Batch Size} = \text{per\_device\_train\_batch\_size} \times \text{num\_devices} \times \text{gradient\_accumulation\_steps}
+$$
+
+To maintain a consistent batch size when scaling to multiple GPUs, make sure to update `per_device_train_batch_size` and `gradient_accumulation_steps` accordingly.
+
+Example, these configurations are equivalent, and should yield the same results:
+
+| Number of GPUs | Per device batch size | Gradient accumulation steps | Comments |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | 32 | 1 | Possibly high memory usage, but faster training |
+| 1 | 4 | 8 | Lower memory usage, slower training |
+| 8 | 4 | 1 | Multi-GPU to get the best of both worlds |
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Having one model per GPU can lead to high memory usage, which may not be feasible for large models or low-memory GPUs. In such cases, you can leverage [DeepSpeed](https://github.com/deepspeedai/DeepSpeed), which provides optimizations like model sharding, Zero Redundancy Optimizer, mixed precision training, and offloading to CPU or NVMe. Check out our [DeepSpeed Integration](deepspeed_integration) guide for more details.
+
+## Context Parallelism
+
+Context Parallelism (CP) is a parallelization technique that enables training with longer sequences by splitting the sequence dimension across multiple GPUs. Each GPU processes a portion of the sequence, allowing you to train with sequences longer than what would fit on a single GPU's memory.
+
+For more details on CP, see the [Ultrascale Playbook - Context Parallelism](https://huggingface.co/spaces/nanotron/ultrascale-playbook?section=context_parallelism).
+
+CP is particularly useful when:
+
+- You want to train with very long sequences (>32k tokens)
+- Single GPU memory is insufficient for your desired sequence length
+- You need to maintain sequence coherence across the full context
+
+### Requirements and Limitations
+
+CP has specific requirements:
+
+1. **Accelerate 1.10 or higher** is required
+2. **FSDP2 (PyTorch FSDP v2)** is required as the distributed training backend
+3. **SDPA attention** - Flash Attention is currently not supported with CP
+4. **Sequence length divisibility** - sequences must be divisible by `cp_size * 2`. This is now automatically handled using the `pad_to_multiple_of` parameter in the data collator, which works seamlessly with both standard and padding-free modes.
+
+### Configuration
+
+To enable CP, you need to configure both Accelerate and your training arguments:
+
+#### Accelerate Configuration
+
+Use one of the provided accelerate config files (e.g. [`context_parallel_2gpu.yaml`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/accelerate_configs/context_parallel_2gpu.yaml) for 2 GPUs):
+
+```yaml
+compute_environment: LOCAL_MACHINE
+debug: false
+distributed_type: FSDP
+downcast_bf16: 'no'
+enable_cpu_affinity: false
+fsdp_config:
+  fsdp_activation_checkpointing: true  # Enable activation checkpointing for memory efficiency
+  fsdp_auto_wrap_policy: TRANSFORMER_BASED_WRAP
+  fsdp_cpu_ram_efficient_loading: true
+  fsdp_offload_params: false
+  fsdp_reshard_after_forward: true
+  fsdp_state_dict_type: FULL_STATE_DICT
+  fsdp_version: 2
+machine_rank: 0
+main_training_function: main
+mixed_precision: bf16
+num_machines: 1
+num_processes: 2  # Number of GPUs
+rdzv_backend: static
+same_network: true
+tpu_env: []
+tpu_use_cluster: false
+tpu_use_sudo: false
+use_cpu: false
+parallelism_config:
+  parallelism_config_dp_replicate_size: 1
+  parallelism_config_dp_shard_size: 1
+  parallelism_config_tp_size: 1
+  parallelism_config_cp_size: 2  # Context parallel size
+```
+
+#### Training Configuration
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    # required
+    pad_to_multiple_of=4,           # ensures divisibility by cp_size * 2
+    # to get the most out of CP
+    max_length=16384,               # long sequence length
+    packing=True,                   # use packing to reduce padding
+    use_liger_kernel=True,          # compatible with CP
+    gradient_checkpointing=False,   # The activation_checkpointing in FSDP config and the gradient_checkpointing in training arg can't be set to True simultaneously
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1,
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+Then, launch your training script with the appropriate accelerate config file:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch --config_file context_parallel_2gpu.yaml train.py
+```
+
+### Best Practices
+
+1. **Use the `pad_to_multiple_of` parameter** - This is now the recommended way to ensure sequence length divisibility:
+   - For `cp_size=2`: use `pad_to_multiple_of=4` (since `cp_size * 2 = 4`)
+   - For `cp_size=4`: use `pad_to_multiple_of=8` (since `cp_size * 2 = 8`)
+   - The data collator automatically pads sequences to the required multiple, ensuring compatibility with CP
+
+2. **Use packing with padding** - The default BFD (Best Fit Decreasing) strategy works perfectly:
+   - Preserves sequence boundaries and maintains training quality
+   - Works seamlessly with both `padding_free=True` and standard padding modes
+
+3. **Combine with other memory optimizations** like Liger kernels, bfloat16, and gradient checkpointing
+
+4. **Start with smaller context parallel sizes** (2-4 GPUs) before scaling up
+
+5. **Monitor memory usage** across all GPUs to ensure balanced workload
+
+### Benchmarking Context Parallelism
+
+We benchmarked CP to highlight its potential improvements in training efficiency.  
+Our experiments were conducted using **1, 2, 4, and 8 H100 GPUs**, though the results can be extended to larger clusters with more nodes and GPUs.
+
+For the setup, we fine-tuned an **8B model** ([Qwen/Qwen3-8B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-8B)) using the provided accelerate configuration  
+([`context_parallel_2gpu.yaml`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/accelerate_configs/context_parallel_2gpu.yaml)).  
+We adjusted `num_processes` and `parallelism_config_cp_size` based on the number of GPUs for each run.  
+Training was performed with the [sft.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/sft.py) example script, combined with the parameters described above.
+
+The results below summarize the **maximum trainable sequence length** and **iterations per second** for different numbers of GPUs. A value marked as `OOM` indicates that the configuration ran out of memory and could not be trained.  
+
+These results show that **Context Parallelism (CP) scales effectively with more GPUs**, enabling training on much longer sequences. With **8 GPUs**, context lengths of over **300k tokens** become feasible, unlocking training with extremely long contexts while maintaining reasonable throughput.  
+
+<div class="flex justify-center">
+  <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/context_parallelism_max_length_plot.png" alt="CP Max content length" width="45%"/>
+  <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/context_parallelism_s_it_plot.png" alt="CP seconds/iteration" width="45%"/>
+</div>
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Accelerate also supports **N-Dimensional Parallelism (ND-parallelism)**, which enables you to combine different parallelization strategies to efficiently distribute model training across multiple GPUs.  
+>
+> You can learn more and explore configuration examples in the [Accelerate ND-parallelism guide](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/blob/main/examples/torch_native_parallelism/README.md#nd-parallelism).
+
+### Further Reading on Context Parallelism
+
+- [Accelerate: Context Parallelism Guide](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/blob/main/docs/source/concept_guides/context_parallelism.md)  
+- [Accelerate Example: 128k Sequence Length](https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/blob/main/examples/torch_native_parallelism/README.md#context-parallelism-128k-sequence-length)  
+- [Hugging Face Blog: Enabling Long-Context Training with Sequence Parallelism in Axolotl](https://huggingface.co/blog/axolotl-ai-co/long-context-with-sequence-parallelism-in-axolotl)  
+- [Snowflake Engineering Blog: Arctic Long Sequence Training (ALST) — Scalable and Efficient Training for Multi-Million Token Sequences (Note that they use a different strategy)](https://www.snowflake.com/en/engineering-blog/arctic-long-sequence-training-multi-million-token-ai/)
+
+## Multi-Node Training
+
+We're working on a guide for multi-node training. Stay tuned! 🚀

docs/source/dpo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+# DPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-DPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=dpo,trl) [![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/smol_course-Chapter_2-yellow)](https://github.com/huggingface/smol-course/tree/main/2_preference_alignment)
+
+## Overview
+
+TRL supports the DPO Trainer for training language models from preference data, as described in the paper [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) by [Rafael Rafailov](https://huggingface.co/rmrafailov), Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, [Stefano Ermon](https://huggingface.co/ermonste), [Christopher D. Manning](https://huggingface.co/manning), [Chelsea Finn](https://huggingface.co/cbfinn).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper we introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form, allowing us to solve the standard RLHF problem with only a simple classification loss. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for sampling from the LM during fine-tuning or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds PPO-based RLHF in ability to control sentiment of generations, and matches or improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.
+
+The first step is to train an SFT model, to ensure the data we train on is in-distribution for the DPO algorithm.
+
+Then, fine-tuning a language model via DPO consists of two steps and is easier than [PPO](ppo_trainer):
+
+1. **Data collection**: Gather a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference) with positive and negative selected pairs of generation, given a prompt.
+2. **Optimization**: Maximize the log-likelihood of the DPO loss directly.
+
+This process is illustrated in the sketch below (from [Figure 1 of the DPO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290)):
+
+![Figure 1 DPO](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/assets/49240599/9150fac6-3d88-4ca2-8ec6-2a6f3473216d)
+
+Read more about DPO algorithm in the [original paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the DPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_dpo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-DPO")
+trainer = DPOTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_dpo.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 3 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
+
+![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/dpo-qwen2-reward-margin.png)
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-DPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
+
+<pre><code>$ transformers chat trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-DPO
+<strong><span style="color: red;">&lt;shirin_yamani&gt;:</span></strong>
+What is Huggingface?
+
+<strong><span style="color: blue;">&lt;trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-DPO&gt;:</span></strong>
+Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets for the development of machine learning models and applications. It provides a repository of over 300, 000 pre-trained models in  Huggingface is a platform that allows users to access a variety of open-source machine learning resources such as pre-trained models and datasets for the development of machine learning models and applications. It provides a repository of over 300, 000  pre-trained models in a variety of languages, enabling users to explore and utilize the latest techniques and technologies in the field of machine learning.
+</code></pre>
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+DPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`DPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+Although the [`DPOTrainer`] supports both explicit and implicit prompts, we recommend using explicit prompts. If provided with an implicit prompt dataset, the trainer will automatically extract the prompt from the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` columns. For more information, refer to the [preference style](dataset_formats#preference) section.
+
+### Special considerations for vision-language models
+
+The [`DPOTrainer`] supports fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs). For these models, a vision dataset is required. To learn more about the specific format for vision datasets, refer to the [Vision dataset format](dataset_formats#vision-datasets) section.
+
+Additionally, unlike standard text-based models where a `tokenizer` is used, for VLMs, you should replace the `tokenizer` with a `processor`.
+
+```diff
+- model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)
++ model = AutoModelForImageTextToText.from_pretrained(model_id)
+
+- tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
++ processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained(model_id)
+
+  trainer = DPOTrainer(
+      model,
+      args=training_args,
+      train_dataset=train_dataset,
+-     processing_class=tokenizer,
++     processing_class=processor,
+)
+```
+
+For a complete example of fine-tuning a vision-language model, refer to the script in [`examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py).
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the DPO method. The script is available in [`trl/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/dpo.py)
+
+To test the DPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch trl/scripts/dpo.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-DPO
+```
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+- `rewards/chosen`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
+- `rewards/rejected`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
+- `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
+- `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
+
+## Loss functions
+
+The DPO algorithm supports several loss functions. The loss function can be set using the `loss_type` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`]. The following loss functions are supported:
+
+| `loss_type=` | Description |
+| --- | --- |
+| `"sigmoid"` (default) | Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model and in fact the [DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290) authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression. |
+| `"hinge"` | The [RSO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425) paper. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the margin. |
+| `"ipo"` | The [IPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss. In this case, the `beta` is the reciprocal of the gap between the log-likelihood ratios of the chosen vs the rejected completion pair and thus the smaller the `beta` the larger this gaps is. As per the paper the loss is averaged over log-likelihoods of the completion (unlike DPO which is summed only). |
+| `"exo_pair"` | The [EXO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.00856) authors propose to minimize the reverse KL instead of the negative log-sigmoid loss of DPO which corresponds to forward KL. Setting non-zero `label_smoothing` (default `1e-3`) leads to a simplified version of EXO on pair-wise preferences (see Eqn. (16) of the [EXO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.00856)). The full version of EXO uses `K>2` completions generated by the SFT policy, which becomes an unbiased estimator of the PPO objective (up to a constant) when `K` is sufficiently large. |
+| `"nca_pair"` | The [NCA](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.05369) authors shows that NCA optimizes the absolute likelihood for each response rather than the relative likelihood. |
+| `"robust"` | The [Robust DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.00409) authors propose an unbiased estimate of the DPO loss that is robust to preference noise in the data. Like in cDPO, it assumes that the preference labels are noisy with some probability. In this approach, the `label_smoothing` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`] is used to model the probability of existing label noise. To apply this conservative loss, set `label_smoothing` to a value greater than 0.0 (between 0.0 and 0.5; the default is 0.0) |
+| `"bco_pair"` | The [BCO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.04656) authors train a binary classifier whose logit serves as a reward so that the classifier maps {prompt, chosen completion} pairs to 1 and {prompt, rejected completion} pairs to 0. For unpaired data, we recommend the dedicated [`BCOTrainer`]. |
+| `"sppo_hard"` | The [SPPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.00675) authors claim that SPPO is capable of solving the Nash equilibrium iteratively by pushing the chosen rewards to be as large as 1/2 and the rejected rewards to be as small as -1/2 and can alleviate data sparsity issues. The implementation approximates this algorithm by employing hard label probabilities, assigning 1 to the winner and 0 to the loser. |
+| `"aot"`  or `loss_type="aot_pair"` | The [AOT](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.05882) authors propose to use Distributional Preference Alignment Via Optimal Transport. Traditionally, the alignment algorithms use paired preferences at a sample level, which does not ensure alignment on the distributional level. AOT, on the other hand, can align LLMs on paired or unpaired preference data by making the reward distribution of the positive samples stochastically dominant in the first order on the distribution of negative samples. Specifically, `loss_type="aot"` is appropriate for paired datasets, where each prompt has both chosen and rejected responses; `loss_type="aot_pair"` is for unpaired datasets. In a nutshell, `loss_type="aot"` ensures that the log-likelihood ratio of chosen to rejected of the aligned model has higher quantiles than that ratio for the reference model. `loss_type="aot_pair"` ensures that the chosen reward is higher on all quantiles than the rejected reward. Note that in both cases quantiles are obtained via sorting. To fully leverage the advantages of the AOT algorithm, it is important to maximize the per-GPU batch size. |
+| `"apo_zero"` or `loss_type="apo_down"` | The [APO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2408.06266) method introduces an "anchored" version of the alignment objective. There are two variants: `apo_zero` and `apo_down`. The `apo_zero` loss increases the likelihood of winning outputs while decreasing the likelihood of losing outputs, making it suitable when the model is less performant than the winning outputs. On the other hand, `apo_down` decreases the likelihood of both winning and losing outputs, but with a stronger emphasis on reducing the likelihood of losing outputs. This variant is more effective when the model is better than the winning outputs. |
+| `"discopop"` | The [DiscoPOP](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.08414) paper uses LLMs to discover more efficient offline preference optimization losses. In the paper the proposed DiscoPOP loss (which is a log-ratio modulated loss) outperformed other optimization losses on different tasks (IMDb positive text generation, Reddit TLDR summarization, and Alpaca Eval 2.0). |
+| `"sft"` | SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning) loss is the negative log likelihood loss, used to train the model to generate preferred responses. |
+
+### Multi-loss combinations
+
+The DPO trainer supports combining multiple loss functions with different weights, enabling more sophisticated optimization strategies. This is particularly useful for implementing algorithms like MPO (Mixed Preference Optimization). MPO is a training approach that combines multiple optimization objectives, as described in the paper [Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2411.10442).
+
+To combine multiple losses, specify the loss types and corresponding weights as lists:
+
+```python
+# MPO: Combines DPO (sigmoid) for preference and BCO (bco_pair) for quality
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type=["sigmoid", "bco_pair", "sft"],  # Loss types to combine
+    loss_weights=[0.8, 0.2, 1.0]  # Corresponding weights, as used in the MPO paper
+)
+```
+
+If `loss_weights` is not provided, all loss types will have equal weights (1.0 by default).
+
+### Label smoothing
+
+The [cDPO](https://ericmitchell.ai/cdpo.pdf) is a tweak on the DPO loss where we assume that the preference labels are noisy with some probability. In this approach, the `label_smoothing` parameter in the [`DPOConfig`] is used to model the probability of existing label noise. To apply this conservative loss, set `label_smoothing` to a value greater than 0.0 (between 0.0 and 0.5; the default is 0.0).
+
+### Syncing the reference model
+
+The [TR-DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.09656) paper suggests syncing the reference model weights after every `ref_model_sync_steps` steps of SGD with weight `ref_model_mixup_alpha` during DPO training. To toggle this callback use the `sync_ref_model=True` in the [`DPOConfig`].
+
+### RPO loss
+
+The [RPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.19733) paper implements an iterative preference tuning algorithm using a loss related to the RPO loss in this [paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.16436) that essentially consists of a weighted SFT loss on the chosen preferences together with the DPO loss. To use this loss, set the `rpo_alpha` in the [`DPOConfig`] to an appropriate value. The paper suggests setting this weight to `1.0`.
+
+### WPO loss
+
+The [WPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.11827) paper adapts off-policy data to resemble on-policy data more closely by reweighting preference pairs according to their probability under the current policy. To use this method, set the `use_weighting` flag to `True` in the [`DPOConfig`].
+
+### LD-DPO loss
+
+The [LD-DPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2409.06411) paper decomposes the portion of the response that exceeds the desired length into two components — human-like preferences and verbosity preference — based on a mixing coefficient  \\( \alpha \\). To use this method, set the `ld_alpha` in the [`DPOConfig`] to an appropriate value. The paper suggests setting this value between `0.0` and `1.0`.
+
+### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
+
+MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.  
+To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
+
+This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).  
+To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
+
+## Accelerate DPO fine-tuning using `unsloth`
+
+You can further accelerate QLoRA / LoRA (2x faster, 60% less memory) using the [`unsloth`](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) library that is fully compatible with `SFTTrainer`. Currently `unsloth` supports only Llama (Yi, TinyLlama, Qwen, Deepseek etc) and Mistral architectures. Some benchmarks for DPO listed below:
+
+| GPU | Model | Dataset | 🤗 | 🤗 + FlashAttention 2 | 🦥 Unsloth | 🦥 VRAM saved |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| A100 40G | Zephyr 7b | Ultra Chat | 1x | 1.24x | **1.88x** | -11.6% |
+| Tesla T4 | Zephyr 7b | Ultra Chat | 1x | 1.09x | **1.55x** | -18.6% |
+
+First install `unsloth` according to the [official documentation](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth). Once installed, you can incorporate unsloth into your workflow in a very simple manner; instead of loading `AutoModelForCausalLM`, you just need to load a `FastLanguageModel` as follows:
+
+```diff
+  from datasets import load_dataset
+  from trl import DPOConfig, DPOTrainer
+- from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
++ from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
+
+- model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+- tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
++ model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
++ model = FastLanguageModel.get_peft_model(model)
+  train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+- training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-DPO")
++ training_args = DPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-DPO", bf16=True)
+  trainer = DPOTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+  trainer.train()
+
+```
+
+The saved model is fully compatible with Hugging Face's transformers library. Learn more about unsloth in their [official repository](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth).
+
+## Reference model considerations with PEFT
+
+You have three main options (plus several variants) for how the reference model works when using PEFT, assuming the model that you would like to further enhance with DPO was tuned using (Q)LoRA.
+
+1. Simply create two instances of the model, each loading your adapter - works fine but is very inefficient.
+2. Merge the adapter into the base model, create another adapter on top, then leave the `ref_model` param null, in which case DPOTrainer will unload the adapter for reference inference - efficient, but has potential downsides discussed below.
+3. Load the adapter twice with different names, then use `set_adapter` during training to swap between the adapter being DPO'd and the reference adapter - slightly less efficient compared to 2 (~adapter size VRAM overhead), but avoids the pitfalls.
+
+### Downsides to merging QLoRA before DPO (approach 2)
+
+As suggested by [Benjamin Marie](https://medium.com/@bnjmn_marie/dont-merge-your-lora-adapter-into-a-4-bit-llm-65b6da287997), the best option for merging QLoRA adapters is to first dequantize the base model, then merge the adapter. Something similar to [this script](https://github.com/jondurbin/qlora/blob/main/qmerge.py).
+
+However, after using this approach, you will have an unquantized base model. Therefore, to use QLoRA for DPO, you will need to re-quantize the merged model or use the unquantized merge (resulting in higher memory demand).
+
+### Using option 3 - load the adapter twice
+
+To avoid the downsides with option 2, you can load your fine-tuned adapter into the model twice, with different names, and set the model/ref adapter names in [`DPOTrainer`].
+
+For example:
+
+```python
+# Load the base model.
+bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
+    load_in_4bit=True,
+    llm_int8_threshold=6.0,
+    llm_int8_has_fp16_weight=False,
+    bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
+    bnb_4bit_use_double_quant=True,
+    bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
+)
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
+    "mistralai/mixtral-8x7b-v0.1",
+    load_in_4bit=True,
+    quantization_config=bnb_config,
+    attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
+    dtype=torch.bfloat16,
+    device_map="auto",
+)
+
+# Load the adapter.
+model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(
+    model,
+    "/path/to/peft",
+    is_trainable=True,
+    adapter_name="train",
+)
+# Load the adapter a second time, with a different name, which will be our reference model.
+model.load_adapter("/path/to/peft", adapter_name="reference")
+
+# Initialize the trainer, without a ref_model param.
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    model_adapter_name="train",
+    ref_adapter_name="reference",
+)
+dpo_trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model,
+    args=training_args,
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+## DPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] DPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## DPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] DPOConfig
+
+## DataCollatorForPreference
+
+[[autodoc]] trainer.dpo_trainer.DataCollatorForPreference
+
+## FDivergenceType
+
+[[autodoc]] trainer.dpo_trainer.FDivergenceType

docs/source/dpo_trainer.mdx

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
-# DPO Trainer
-
-TRL supports the DPO Trainer for training language models from preference data, as described in the paper [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290) by Rafailov et al., 2023. For a full example have a look at  [`examples/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo.py).
-
-
-The first step as always is to train your SFT model, to ensure the data we train on is in-distribution for the DPO algorithm.
-
-## Expected dataset format
-
-The DPO trainer expects a very specific format for the dataset. Since the model will be trained to directly optimize the preference of which sentence is the most relevant, given two sentences. We provide an example from the [`Anthropic/hh-rlhf`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset below:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/rlhf-antropic-example.png", width="50%">
-</div>
-
-Therefore the final dataset object should contain these 3 entries if you use the default `DPODataCollatorWithPadding` data collator. The entries should be named:
-
-- `prompt`
-- `chosen`
-- `rejected`
-
-for example:
-
-```py
-dpo_dataset_dict = {
-    "prompt": [
-        "hello",
-        "how are you",
-        "What is your name?",
-        "What is your name?",
-        "Which is the best programming language?",
-        "Which is the best programming language?",
-        "Which is the best programming language?",
-    ],
-    "chosen": [
-        "hi nice to meet you",
-        "I am fine",
-        "My name is Mary",
-        "My name is Mary",
-        "Python",
-        "Python",
-        "Java",
-    ],
-    "rejected": [
-        "leave me alone",
-        "I am not fine",
-        "Whats it to you?",
-        "I dont have a name",
-        "Javascript",
-        "C++",
-        "C++",
-    ],
-}
-```
-
-where the `prompt` contains the context inputs, `chosen` contains the corresponding chosen responses and `rejected` contains the corresponding negative (rejected) responses. As can be seen a prompt can have multiple responses and this is reflected in the entries being repeated in the dictionary's value arrays.
-
-## Expected model format
-The DPO trainer expects a model of `AutoModelForCausalLM`, compared to PPO that expects `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` for the value function.
-
-## Using the `DPOTrainer`
-
-For a detailed example have a look at the `examples/scripts/dpo.py` script. At a high level we need to initialize the `DPOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train, a reference `ref_model` which we will use to calculate the implicit rewards of the preferred and rejected response, the `beta` refers to the hyperparameter of the implicit reward, and the dataset contains the 3 entries listed above. Note that the `model` and `ref_model` need to have the same architecture (ie decoder only or encoder-decoder).
-
-```py
- dpo_trainer = DPOTrainer(
-    model,
-    model_ref,
-    args=training_args,
-    beta=0.1,
-    train_dataset=train_dataset,
-    tokenizer=tokenizer,
-)
-```
-After this one can then call:
-
-```py
-dpo_trainer.train()
-```
-
-Note that the `beta` is the temperature parameter for the DPO loss, typically something in the range of `0.1` to `0.5`. We ignore the reference model as `beta` -> 0.
-
-## Loss functions
-
-Given the preference data, we can fit a binary classifier according to the Bradley-Terry model and in fact the DPO authors propose the sigmoid loss on the normalized likelihood via the `logsigmoid` to fit a logistic regression.
-
-The [RSO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06657) authors propose to use a hinge loss on the normalized likelihood from the [SLiC](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10425) paper. The `DPOTrainer` can be switched to this loss via the `loss_type="hinge"` argument and the `beta` in this case is the reciprocal of the margin.
-
-The [IPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12036) authors provide a deeper theoretical understanding of the DPO algorithms and identify an issue with overfitting and propose an alternative loss which can be used via the `loss_type="ipo"` argument to the trainer.
-
-The [cDPO](https://ericmitchell.ai/cdpo.pdf) is a tweak on the DPO loss where we assume that the preference labels are noisy with some probability that can be passed to the `DPOTrainer` via `label_smoothing` argument (between 0 and 0.5) and then a conservative DPO loss is used. Use the `loss_type="cdpo"` argument to the trainer to use it.
-
-The [KTO](https://github.com/ContextualAI/HALOs/blob/main/assets/report.pdf) loss is derived to directly maximize the utility of LLM generations instead of the log-likelihood of preferences. Thus the dataset are not necessarily preferences but rather desirable vs undesirable completions. For paired preference data as required by the `DPOTrainer`, use the `loss_type="kto_pair"` argument to the trainer to utilize this loss, while for the more general case of desired and undesirable data, use the as of yet unimplemented `KTOTrainer`.
-
-## Logging
-
-While training and evaluating we record the following reward metrics:
-
-* `rewards/chosen`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
-* `rewards/rejected`: the mean difference between the log probabilities of the policy model and the reference model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
-* `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
-* `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
-
-## DPOTrainer
-
-[[autodoc]] DPOTrainer

docs/source/example_overview.md

@@ -1,25 +1,24 @@
 # Examples
 
-
 ## Introduction
 
 The examples should work in any of the following settings (with the same script):
-   - single GPU
-   - multi GPUS (using PyTorch distributed mode)
-   - multi GPUS (using DeepSpeed ZeRO-Offload stages 1, 2, & 3)
-   - fp16 (mixed-precision), fp32 (normal precision), or bf16 (bfloat16 precision)
 
-To run it in each of these various modes, first initialize the accelerate
-configuration with `accelerate config`
+- single GPU
+- multi GPUs (using PyTorch distributed mode)
+- multi GPUs (using DeepSpeed ZeRO-Offload stages 1, 2, & 3)
+- fp16 (mixed-precision), fp32 (normal precision), or bf16 (bfloat16 precision)
 
-**NOTE to train with a 4-bit or 8-bit model**, please run
+To run it in each of these various modes, first initialize the accelerate configuration with `accelerate config`.
+
+To train with a 4-bit or 8-bit model, please run:
 
 ```bash
 pip install --upgrade trl[quantization]
 ```
 
-
 ## Accelerate Config
+
 For all the examples, you'll need to generate a 🤗 Accelerate config file with:
 
 ```shell
@@ -28,35 +27,52 @@ accelerate config # will prompt you to define the training configuration
 
 Then, it is encouraged to launch jobs with `accelerate launch`!
 
+## Maintained Examples
 
-# Maintained Examples
+Scripts can be used as examples of how to use TRL trainers. They are located in the [`trl/scripts`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts) directory. Additionally, we provide examples in the [`examples/scripts`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts) directory. These examples are maintained and tested regularly.
 
-
-| File                                                                                           | Description                                                                                                              |
-|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| [`examples/scripts/sft.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft.py) | This script shows how to use the `SFTTrainer` to fine tune a model or adapters into a target dataset.                     |
-| [`examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py) | This script shows how to use the `RewardTrainer` to train a reward model on your own dataset.                            |
-| [`examples/scripts/ppo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo.py) | This script shows how to use the `PPOTrainer` to fine-tune a sentiment analysis model using IMDB dataset                 |
-| [`examples/scripts/ppo_multi_adapter.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo_multi_adapter.py) | This script shows how to use the `PPOTrainer` to train a single base model with multiple adapters. Requires you to run the example script with the reward model training beforehand. |
-| [`examples/scripts/stable_diffusion_tuning_example.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/stable_diffusion_tuning_example.py) | This script shows to use DDPOTrainer to fine-tune a stable diffusion model using reinforcement learning.                 |
+| File | Description |
+| --- | --- |
+| [`examples/scripts/bco.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/bco.py) | This script shows how to use the [`KTOTrainer`] with the BCO loss to fine-tune a model to increase instruction-following, truthfulness, honesty and helpfulness using the [openbmb/UltraFeedback](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/cpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/cpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`CPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to increase helpfulness and harmlessness using the [Anthropic/hh-rlhf](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset. |
+| [`trl/scripts/dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/dpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`DPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`DPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a Vision Language Model to reduce hallucinations using the [openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/RLAIF-V-Dataset) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py) | This script shows how to use [`HfPairwiseJudge`] or [`OpenAIPairwiseJudge`] to judge model generations. |
+| [`examples/scripts/gkd.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gkd.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GKDTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`trl/scripts/grpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/grpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a multimodal model for reasoning using the [lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/gspo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gspo.py) | This script shows how to use GSPO via the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune model for reasoning using the [AI-MO/NuminaMath-TIR](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI-MO/NuminaMath-TIR) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/gspo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/gspo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use GSPO via the [`GRPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a multimodal model for reasoning using the [lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/kto.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/kto.py) | This script shows how to use the [`KTOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/mpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/mpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use MPO via the [`DPOTrainer`] to align a model based on preferences using the [HuggingFaceH4/rlaif-v_formatted](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/rlaif-v_formatted) dataset and a set of loss weights with weights. |
+| [`examples/scripts/nash_md.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/nash_md.py) | This script shows how to use the [`NashMDTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/online_dpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/online_dpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/online_dpo_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/online_dpo_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a a Vision Language Model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/orpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/orpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`ORPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to increase helpfulness and harmlessness using the [Anthropic/hh-rlhf](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/ppo/ppo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo/ppo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to continue text with positive sentiment or physically descriptive language. |
+| [`examples/scripts/ppo/ppo_tldr.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo/ppo_tldr.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to generate TL;DR summaries. |
+| [`examples/scripts/prm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/prm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`PRMTrainer`] to fine-tune a Process-supervised Reward Model (PRM). |
+| [`examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py) | This script shows how to use the [`RewardTrainer`] to train a Outcome Reward Model (ORM) on your own dataset. |
+| [`examples/scripts/rloo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/rloo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`RLOOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model to improve its ability to solve math questions. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/sft.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft_gemma3.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_gemma3.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Gemma 3 model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft_video_llm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_video_llm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Video Language Model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Vision Language Model in a chat setting. The script has only been tested with [LLaVA 1.5](https://huggingface.co/llava-hf/llava-1.5-7b-hf), [LLaVA 1.6](https://huggingface.co/llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf), and [Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct) models so users may see unexpected behaviour in other model architectures. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm_gemma3.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm_gemma3.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a Gemma 3 model on vision to text tasks. |
+| [`examples/scripts/sft_vlm_smol_vlm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_vlm_smol_vlm.py) | This script shows how to use the [`SFTTrainer`] to fine-tune a SmolVLM model. |
+| [`examples/scripts/xpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/xpo.py) | This script shows how to use the [`XPOTrainer`] to fine-tune a model. |
 
 Here are also some easier-to-run colab notebooks that you can use to get started with TRL:
 
-
-| File                                                                                           | Description                                                                                                              |
-|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| [`examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb)                       | This notebook demonstrates how to use the "Best of N" sampling strategy using TRL when fine-tuning your model with PPO.  |
-| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb)              | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 imdb sentiment tuning example on a jupyter notebook.                |
-| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb)                  | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 sentiment control example on a jupyter notebook.                    |
-
-
-We also have some other examples that are less maintained but can be used as a reference:
-1. **[research_projects](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/research_projects)**: Check out this folder to find the scripts used for some research projects that used TRL (LM de-toxification, Stack-Llama, etc.)
-
+| File | Description |
+| --- | --- |
+| [`examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/best_of_n.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to use the "Best of N" sampling strategy using TRL when fine-tuning your model with PPO. |
+| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 imdb sentiment tuning example on a jupyter notebook. |
+| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 sentiment control example on a jupyter notebook. |
 
 ## Distributed training
 
-All of the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs by providing the path of an 🤗 Accelerate config file when calling `accelerate launch`. To launch one of them on one or multiple GPUs, run the following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine and `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments.)
+All the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs by providing the path of an 🤗 Accelerate config file when calling `accelerate launch`. To launch one of them on one or multiple GPUs, run the following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine and `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments).
 
 ```shell
 accelerate launch --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/multi_gpu.yaml --num_processes {NUM_GPUS} path_to_script.py --all_arguments_of_the_script
@@ -66,7 +82,7 @@ You can also adjust the parameters of the 🤗 Accelerate config file to suit yo
 
 ### Distributed training with DeepSpeed
 
-Most of the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs together with DeepSpeed ZeRO-{1,2,3} for efficient sharding of the optimizer states, gradients, and model weights. To do so, run following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine, `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments, and `--deepspeed_config` with the path to the DeepSpeed config file such as `examples/deepspeed_configs/deepspeed_zero1.yaml`):
+Most of the scripts can be run on multiple GPUs together with DeepSpeed ZeRO-{1,2,3} for efficient sharding of the optimizer states, gradients, and model weights. To do so, run the following command (swapping `{NUM_GPUS}` with the number of GPUs in your machine, `--all_arguments_of_the_script` with your arguments, and `--deepspeed_config` with the path to the DeepSpeed config file such as `examples/deepspeed_configs/deepspeed_zero1.yaml`):
 
 ```shell
 accelerate launch --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero{1,2,3}.yaml --num_processes {NUM_GPUS} path_to_script.py --all_arguments_of_the_script

docs/source/experimental.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+# Experimental Features
+
+The `trl.experimental` namespace provides a minimal, clearly separated space for fast iteration on new ideas.
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> **Stability contract:** Anything under `trl.experimental` may change or be removed in *any* release (including patch versions) without prior deprecation. Do not rely on these APIs for production workloads.
+
+## Current Experimental Features
+
+The following modules are currently available under [`trl.experimental`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/trl/experimental).
+This list is not exhaustive and may change at any time.
+
+### BEMA for Reference Model
+
+This feature implements the BEMA algorithm to update the reference model during DPO training.
+
+```python
+from trl.experimental.bema_for_ref_model import BEMACallback, DPOTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+
+pref_dataset = load_dataset("trl-internal-testing/zen", "standard_preference", split="train")
+ref_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("trl-internal-testing/tiny-Qwen2ForCausalLM-2.5")
+
+bema_callback = BEMACallback(update_ref_model=True)
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("trl-internal-testing/tiny-Qwen2ForCausalLM-2.5")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("trl-internal-testing/tiny-Qwen2ForCausalLM-2.5")
+tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    ref_model=ref_model,
+    train_dataset=pref_dataset,
+    processing_class=tokenizer,
+    callbacks=[bema_callback],
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### GFPO
+
+This feature implements the GFPO algorithm to enforce concise reasoning in the model's output generation, as proposed in the paper [Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.09726).
+
+To activate GFPO in [`GFPOTrainer`]:
+
+- set `num_remains_in_group` in [`GFPOConfig`]
+- define a group filter function and set it to `group_filter_func` in [`GFPOTrainer`]. `group_filter_func` will score the `num_generations` completions and The GFPOTrainer filters groups according to their scores to get top `num_remains_in_group` completions as a new group. Model will be trained on the filtered group.
+
+```python
+# train_gfpo.py
+from trl.experimental.gfpo import GFPOConfig, GFPOTrainer
+
+# dummy group filter to scores the completions based on its indice in group
+class GroupFilter:
+    def __call__(self, group_completions, group_rewards, **kwargs):
+        group_scores = []
+        for completions, rewards in zip(group_completions, group_rewards):
+            scores = [float(i) for i in range(len(completions))]
+            group_scores.append(scores)
+        return group_scores
+
+training_args = GFPOConfig(
+    output_dir="Qwen3-0.6B-GFPO",
+    per_device_train_batch_size=4,
+    num_remains_in_group=2,
+    bf16=True,
+)
+trainer = GFPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B",
+    reward_funcs=...,
+    train_dataset=...,
+    args=training_args,
+    group_filter_func=GroupFilter(),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### GSPO-token
+
+In the paper [Group Sequence Policy Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2507.18071), the authors propose a token-level objective variant to GSPO, called GSPO-token. To use GSPO-token, you can use the `GRPOTrainer` class in `trl.experimental.gspo_token`.
+
+```python
+from trl.experimental.gspo_token import GRPOTrainer
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    importance_sampling_level="sequence_token",
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> To leverage GSPO-token, the user will need to provide the per-token advantage  \\( \hat{A_{i,t}} \\) for each token  \\( t \\) in the sequence  \\( i \\) (i.e., make  \\( \hat{A_{i,t}} \\) varies with  \\( t \\)—which isn't the case here,  \\( \hat{A_{i,t}}=\hat{A_{i}} \\)). Otherwise, GSPO-Token gradient is just equivalent to the original GSPO implementation.
+
+### GRPO With Replay Buffer
+
+This experimental trainer, trains a model with GRPO but replaces groups (and corresponding completions) that have 0 standard deviation with groups with high rewards and standard deviation that've been used to train a model in prior batches.
+
+#### Usage
+
+```python
+from trl.experimental.grpo_with_replay_buffer import GRPOWithReplayBufferTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-internal-testing/zen", "standard_prompt_only", split="train")
+
+# Guarantee that some rewards have 0 std
+def custom_reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
+    if torch.rand(1).item() < 0.25:
+        return [0] * len(completions)  # simulate some None rewards
+    else:
+        return torch.rand(len(completions)).tolist()
+
+training_args = GRPOWithReplayBufferConfig(
+    output_dir=self.tmp_dir,
+    learning_rate=1e-4,
+    per_device_train_batch_size=4,
+    num_generations=4,
+    max_completion_length=8,
+    replay_buffer_size=8,
+    report_to="none",
+)
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="trl-internal-testing/tiny-Qwen2ForCausalLM-2.5",
+    reward_funcs=[custom_reward_func],
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+
+previous_trainable_params = {n: param.clone() for n, param in trainer.model.named_parameters()}
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+To silence the runtime notice:
+
+```bash
+export TRL_EXPERIMENTAL_SILENCE=1
+```
+
+## Promotion Path (Simple)
+
+1. **Prototype outside the main repo:** Start development in your own fork or a separate repository to iterate quickly.
+2. **Experimental inclusion:** Once it’s ready for early users, move the idea into `trl.experimental.<feature>`.
+3. **Improve:** Add tests, a short doc/example, and demonstrate the usage.
+4. **Promote:** Once the API proves stable and there is clear interest or adoption from the community, move it into `trl.<feature>` (stable module).
+
+## FAQ
+
+**Why not just use branches?**
+Because branches are not shipped to users; experimental code inside the package lets early adopters try things and give feedback.
+
+**Can these APIs change or vanish without warning?**
+Yes. Anything inside `trl.experimental` can change or disappear in *any* release.
+
+**Should I use this in production?**
+Only if you are fine with updating your code quickly when things change.
+
+**Will maintainers promptly fix issues in `trl.experimental`?**
+Not necessarily. The experimental module is a playground for new ideas, and maintainers may not prioritize bug fixes or feature requests there. Issues may remain unresolved until (or unless) the feature graduates to the stable API.

docs/source/gkd_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# Generalized Knowledge Distillation Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-GKD-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=gkd,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+Generalized Knowledge Distillation (GKD) was proposed in [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://huggingface.co/papers/2306.13649) by Rishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk, Sabela Ramos, Matthieu Geist, and Olivier Bachem.
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Knowledge distillation (KD) is widely used for compressing a teacher model to reduce its inference cost and memory footprint, by training a smaller student model. However, current KD methods for auto-regressive sequence models suffer from distribution mismatch between output sequences seen during training and those generated by the student during inference. To address this issue, we introduce Generalized Knowledge Distillation (GKD). Instead of solely relying on a fixed set of output sequences, GKD trains the student on its self-generated output sequences by leveraging feedback from the teacher on such sequences. Unlike supervised KD approaches, GKD also offers the flexibility to employ alternative loss functions between the student and teacher, which can be useful when the student lacks the expressivity to mimic the teacher's distribution. Furthermore, GKD facilitates the seamless integration of distillation with RL fine-tuning (RLHF). We demonstrate the efficacy of GKD for distilling auto-regressive language models on summarization, translation, and arithmetic reasoning tasks, and task-agnostic distillation for instruction-tuning.
+
+The key aspects of GKD are:
+
+1. It addresses the train-inference distribution mismatch in auto-regressive sequence models by training the student model on its self-generated output sequences.
+2. GKD allows flexibility in choosing different divergence measures between student and teacher models via the generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD), which can be useful when the student lacks the capacity to fully mimic the teacher.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif) and [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun).
+
+## Usage tips
+
+The [`GKDTrainer`] is a wrapper around the [`SFTTrainer`] class that takes in a teacher model argument. It needs three parameters to be set via the [`GKDConfig`] namely:
+
+* `lmbda`:  controls the student data fraction, i.e., the proportion of on-policy student-generated outputs. When `lmbda=0.0`, the loss reduces to supervised JSD where the student is trained with the token-level probabilities of the teacher. When `lmbda=1.0`, the loss reduces to on-policy JSD, where the student generates output sequences and token-specific feedback on these sequences from the teacher. For values in between [0, 1] it is random between the two based on the `lmbda` value for each batch.
+* `seq_kd`:  controls whether to perform Sequence-Level KD (can be viewed as supervised FT on teacher-generated out). When `seq_kd=True` and `lmbda=0.0`, the loss reduces to supervised JSD, where the teacher generates output sequences and the student receives token-specific feedback on these sequences from the teacher. 
+* `beta`: controls the interpolation in the generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence.  When `beta=0.0` the loss approximates forward KL divergence, while for `beta=1.0` the loss approximates reverse KL divergence. For values in between [0, 1] it interpolates between the two.
+
+The authors find that on-policy data (high `lmbda`) performs better and the optimal `beta` varied depending on the task and evaluation method.
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Make sure that `attn_implementation="flash_attention_2"` when training [Gemma models](https://huggingface.co/models?other=gemma2). Otherwise you will encounter NaNs in the logits due to the [soft capping technique](https://huggingface.co/blog/gemma2#soft-capping-and-attention-implementations) adopted by this architecture.
+
+The basic API is as follows:
+
+```python
+from datasets import Dataset
+from trl import GKDConfig, GKDTrainer
+from transformers import (
+    AutoModelForCausalLM,
+    AutoTokenizer,
+)
+
+NUM_DUMMY_SAMPLES = 100
+
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+# The model to optimise
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+# The teacher model to calculate the KL divergence against
+teacher_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct")
+
+train_dataset = Dataset.from_dict(
+    {
+        "messages": [
+            [
+                {"role": "user", "content": "Hi, how are you?"},
+                {"role": "assistant", "content": "I'm great thanks"},
+            ]
+        ]
+        * NUM_DUMMY_SAMPLES
+    }
+)
+eval_dataset = Dataset.from_dict(
+    {
+        "messages": [
+            [
+                {"role": "user", "content": "What colour is the sky?"},
+                {"role": "assistant", "content": "The sky is blue"},
+            ]
+        ]
+        * NUM_DUMMY_SAMPLES
+    }
+)
+
+training_args = GKDConfig(output_dir="gkd-model", per_device_train_batch_size=1)
+trainer = GKDTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    teacher_model=teacher_model,
+    args=training_args,
+    processing_class=tokenizer,
+    train_dataset=train_dataset,
+    eval_dataset=eval_dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### Expected dataset type
+
+The dataset should be formatted as a list of "messages" where each message is a list of dictionaries with the following keys:
+
+* `role`: either `system`, `assistant` or `user`
+* `content`: the message content
+
+## GKDTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] GKDTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## GKDConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] GKDConfig

docs/source/grpo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@
+# GRPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-GRPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=grpo,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+TRL supports the GRPO Trainer for training language models, as described in the paper [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300) by [Zhihong Shao](https://huggingface.co/syhia), [Peiyi Wang](https://huggingface.co/peiyiwang89), [Qihao Zhu](https://huggingface.co/zqh11), Runxin Xu, [Junxiao Song](https://huggingface.co/haha-point), Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, [Daya Guo](https://huggingface.co/guoday).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Mathematical reasoning poses a significant challenge for language models due to its complex and structured nature. In this paper, we introduce DeepSeekMath 7B, which continues pre-training DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B with 120B math-related tokens sourced from Common Crawl, together with natural language and code data. DeepSeekMath 7B has achieved an impressive score of 51.7% on the competition-level MATH benchmark without relying on external toolkits and voting techniques, approaching the performance level of Gemini-Ultra and GPT-4. Self-consistency over 64 samples from DeepSeekMath 7B achieves 60.9% on MATH. The mathematical reasoning capability of DeepSeekMath is attributed to two key factors: First, we harness the significant potential of publicly available web data through a meticulously engineered data selection pipeline. Second, we introduce Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a variant of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), that enhances mathematical reasoning abilities while concurrently optimizing the memory usage of PPO.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the GRPO method. We train a [Qwen 0.5B Instruct model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) with the prompts from the [UltraFeedback prompts dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model.
+
+```python
+# train_grpo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import GRPOConfig, GRPOTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt", split="train")
+
+# Dummy reward function for demonstration purposes
+def reward_num_unique_letters(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that rewards completions with more unique letters."""
+    completion_contents = [completion[0]["content"] for completion in completions]
+    return [float(len(set(content))) for content in completion_contents]
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-GRPO")
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+    reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_letters,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_grpo.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 1 day.
+
+![GRPO curves](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/grpo_curves.png)
+
+## Looking deeper into the GRPO method
+
+GRPO is an online learning algorithm, meaning it improves iteratively by using the data generated by the trained model itself during training. The intuition behind GRPO objective is to maximize the advantage of the generated completions, while ensuring that the model remains close to the reference policy. To understand how GRPO works, it can be broken down into four main steps: **Generating completions**, **computing the advantage**, **estimating the KL divergence**, and **computing the loss**.
+
+![GRPO visual](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/grpo_visual.png)
+
+### Generating completions
+
+At each training step, we sample a batch of prompts and generate a set of  \\( G \\) completions for each prompt (denoted as  \\( o_i \\)).
+
+### Computing the advantage
+
+For each of the  \\( G \\) sequences, we compute the reward using a reward model or reward function. To align with the comparative nature of reward models—typically trained on datasets of comparisons between outputs for the same question—the advantage is calculated to reflect these relative comparisons. It is normalized as follows:
+
+$$\hat{A}_{i,t} = \frac{r_i - \text{mean}(\mathbf{r})}{\text{std}(\mathbf{r})}$$
+
+This approach gives the method its name: **Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)**.
+
+> [!TIP]
+> It was shown in the paper [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783) that scaling by  \\( \text{std}(\mathbf{r}) \\) may cause a question-level difficulty bias. You can disable this scaling by setting `scale_rewards=False` in [`GRPOConfig`].
+
+> [!TIP]
+> [Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning (Lite PPO)](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.08221) showed that calculating the mean at the local (group) level and the standard deviation at the global (batch) level enables more robust reward shaping. You can use this scaling strategy by setting `scale_rewards="batch"` in [`GRPOConfig`].
+
+### Estimating the KL divergence
+
+KL divergence is estimated using the approximator introduced by [Schulman et al. (2020)](http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html). The approximator is defined as follows:
+
+$$\mathbb{D}_{\text{KL}}\left[\pi_\theta \|\pi_{\text{ref}}\right] = \frac{\pi_{\text{ref}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})} - \log \frac{\pi_{\text{ref}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})} - 1,
+$$
+
+### Computing the loss
+
+The objective is to maximize the advantage while ensuring that the model remains close to the reference policy. Consequently, the loss is defined as follows:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{GRPO}}(\theta) = -\frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^G |o_i|} \sum_{i=1}^G \sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} \left[ \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}{\left[\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})\right]_{\text{no grad}}} \hat{A}_{i,t} - \beta \mathbb{D}_{\text{KL}}\left[\pi_\theta \| \pi_{\text{ref}}\right] \right],
+$$
+
+where the first term represents the scaled advantage and the second term penalizes deviations from the reference policy through KL divergence.
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Note that compared to the original formulation in [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300), we don't scale by  \\( \frac{1}{|o_i|} \\) because it was shown in the paper [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783) that this introduces a response-level length bias. More details in [loss types](#loss-types).
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Note that compared to the original formulation in [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.03300), we use  \\( \beta = 0.0 \\) by default, meaning that the KL divergence term is not used. This choice is motivated by several recent studies (e.g., [Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.24290)) which have shown that the KL divergence term is not essential for training with GRPO. As a result, it has become common practice to exclude it (e.g. [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783), [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476)). If you wish to include the KL divergence term, you can set `beta` in [`GRPOConfig`] to a non-zero value.
+
+In the original paper, this formulation is generalized to account for multiple updates after each generation (denoted  \\( \mu \\), can be set with `num_iterations` in [`GRPOConfig`]) by leveraging the **clipped surrogate objective**:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{GRPO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^G |o_i|} \sum_{i=1}^G \sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} \left[ \min \left( \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})} \hat{A}_{i,t}, \, \text{clip}\left( \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}, 1 - \epsilon, 1 + \epsilon \right) \hat{A}_{i,t} \right) - \beta \mathbb{D}_{\text{KL}}\left[\pi_\theta \| \pi_{\text{ref}}\right] \right],
+$$
+
+where  \\(\text{clip}(\cdot, 1 - \epsilon, 1 + \epsilon) \\) ensures that updates do not deviate excessively from the reference policy by bounding the policy ratio between  \\( 1 - \epsilon \\) and  \\( 1 + \epsilon \\).
+When  \\( \mu = 1 \\) (default in TRL), the clipped surrogate objective simplifies to the original objective.
+
+#### Loss Types
+
+Several formulations of the objective have been proposed in the literature. Initially, the objective of GRPO was defined as follows:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{GRPO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{G} \sum_{i=1}^G \frac{1}{|o_i|} \sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} l_{i,t},
+$$
+
+where
+
+$$
+l_{i,t} = \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}{\left[\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})\right]_{\text{no grad}}} \hat{A}_{i,t} - \beta \mathbb{D}_{\text{KL}}\left[\pi_\theta \| \pi_{\text{ref}}\right].
+$$
+
+The [DAPO paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476) highlights the limitations of the GRPO algorithm’s sample-level loss in long-CoT scenarios, where longer responses are under-penalized, leading to poorer quality outputs. The proposed solution is a token-level normalization, which better handles longer sequences by assigning more balanced rewards to individual tokens, regardless of response length:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{DAPO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^G |o_i|} \sum_{i=1}^G \sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} l_{i,t},
+$$
+
+To use this formulation, set `loss_type="dapo"` in [`GRPOConfig`].
+
+Furthermore, it was demonstrated in the paper [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783) that the initial GRPO formulation introduces a response length bias. They show that while the DAPO formulation reduces this bias, it does not eliminate it completely. To fully remove this bias, they propose dividing by a constant instead of the sequence length, resulting in the following formulation:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{Dr. GRPO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{LG} \sum_{i=1}^G \sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} l_{i,t},
+$$
+
+This constant is recommended to be the maximum completion length. To use this formulation, set `loss_type="dr_grpo"` in the [`GRPOConfig`].
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+- `num_tokens`: The total number of tokens processed so far, including both prompts and completions.
+- `completions/mean_length`: The average length of generated completions.
+- `completions/min_length`: The minimum length of generated completions.
+- `completions/max_length`: The maximum length of generated completions.
+- `completions/mean_terminated_length`: The average length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/min_terminated_length`: The minimum length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/max_terminated_length`: The maximum length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/clipped_ratio`: The ratio of truncated (clipped) completions.
+- `reward/{reward_func_name}/mean`: The average reward from a specific reward function.
+- `reward/{reward_func_name}/std`: The standard deviation of the reward from a specific reward function.
+- `reward`: The overall average reward after applying reward weights.
+- `reward_std`: The standard deviation of rewards after applying reward weights.  
+  - If `scale_rewards` is `"group"` or `"none"`, this is the average of the per-group standard deviations.
+  - If `scale_rewards` is `"batch"`, this is the standard deviation computed over all rewards in the batch (ignoring groups).
+- `frac_reward_zero_std`: The fraction of samples in the generation batch with a reward std of zero, implying there is little diversity for that prompt (all answers are correct or incorrect).
+- `entropy`: Average entropy of token predictions across generated completions. (If `mask_truncated_completions=True`, masked sequences tokens are excluded.)
+- `kl`: The average KL divergence between the model and the reference model, calculated over generated completions. Logged only if `beta` is nonzero.
+- `clip_ratio/region_mean`: The ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities where the GRPO objective is clipped to stay within the trust region:
+  $$
+  \text{clip}\left( r_{i,t}(\theta), 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}, 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high} \right)\,, \qquad r_{i,t}(\theta) = \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,< t})}\,.
+  $$
+  A higher value means more tokens are clipped, which constrains how much the policy $\pi_\theta$ can change.
+- `clip_ratio/low_mean`: The average ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities that were clipped on the lower bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) < 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/low_min`: The minimum ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities that were clipped on the lower bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) < 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/high_mean`: The average ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities that were clipped on the upper bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) > 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/high_max`: The maximum ratio of token (or sequence, if `importance_sampling_level="sequence"`) probabilities that were clipped on the upper bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) > 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high}\\).
+
+## Customization
+
+### Speed up training with vLLM-powered generation
+
+Generation is often the main bottleneck when training with online methods. To accelerate generation, you can use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm), a high-throughput, low-latency inference engine for LLMs. To enable it, first install the package with
+
+```shell
+pip install trl[vllm]
+```
+
+We support two ways of using vLLM during training: **server mode** and **colocate mode**.
+
+> [!TIP]
+> By default, Truncated Importance Sampling is activated for vLLM generation to address the generation-training mismatch that occurs when using different frameworks. This can be turned off by setting `vllm_importance_sampling_correction=False`. For more information, see [Truncated Importance Sampling](paper_index#truncated-importance-sampling)
+
+#### 🔌 Option 1: Server mode
+
+In this mode, vLLM runs in a separate process (and using separate GPUs) and communicates with the trainer via HTTP. This is ideal if you have dedicated GPUs for inference.
+
+1. **Start the vLLM server**:
+
+   ```bash
+   trl vllm-serve --model <model_name>
+   ```
+
+2. **Enable server mode in your training script**:
+
+   ```python
+   from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+   training_args = GRPOConfig(
+       ...,
+       use_vllm=True,
+       vllm_mode="server",  # default value, can be omitted
+   )
+   ```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Make sure that the server is using different GPUs than the trainer, otherwise you may run into NCCL errors. You can specify the GPUs to use with the `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` environment variable.
+
+#### 🧩 Option 2: Colocate mode
+
+In this mode, vLLM runs inside the trainer process and shares GPU memory with the training model. This avoids launching a separate server and can improve GPU utilization, but may lead to memory contention on the training GPUs.
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    ...,
+    use_vllm=True,
+    vllm_mode="colocate",
+)
+```
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Depending on the model size and the overall GPU memory requirements for training, you may need to adjust the `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` parameter in [`GRPOConfig`] to avoid underutilization or out-of-memory errors.
+>
+> We provide a [HF Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/trl-lib/recommend-vllm-memory) to help estimate the recommended GPU memory utilization based on your model configuration and experiment settings. Simply use it as follows to get `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` recommendation:
+>
+> <iframe src="https://trl-lib-recommend-vllm-memory.hf.space" frameborder="0" width="850" height="450"></iframe>
+>
+> If the recommended value does not work in your environment, we suggest adding a small buffer (e.g., +0.05 or +0.1) to the recommended value to ensure stability.
+>
+> If you still find you are getting out-of-memory errors set `vllm_enable_sleep_mode` to True and the vllm parameters and cache will be offloaded during the optimization step. For more information, see [Reducing Memory Usage with vLLM Sleep Mode](reducing_memory_usage#vllm-sleep-mode).
+
+> [!TIP]
+> By default, GRPO uses `MASTER_ADDR=localhost` and `MASTER_PORT=12345` for vLLM, but you can override these values by setting the environment variables accordingly.
+
+For more information, see [Speeding up training with vLLM](speeding_up_training#vllm-for-fast-generation-in-online-methods).
+
+### GRPO at scale: train a 70B+ Model on multiple nodes
+
+When training large models like **Qwen2.5-72B**, you need several key optimizations to make the training efficient and scalable across multiple GPUs and nodes. These include:
+
+- **DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 3**: ZeRO leverages data parallelism to distribute model states (weights, gradients, optimizer states) across multiple GPUs and CPUs, reducing memory and compute requirements on each device. Since large models cannot fit on a single GPU, using ZeRO Stage 3 is required for training such models. For more details, see [DeepSpeed Integration](deepspeed_integration).
+- **Accelerate**: Accelerate is a library that simplifies distributed training across multiple GPUs and nodes. It provides a simple API to launch distributed training and handles the complexities of distributed training, such as data parallelism, gradient accumulation, and distributed data loading. For more details, see [Distributing Training](distributing_training).
+- **vLLM**: See the previous section on how to use vLLM to speed up generation.
+
+Below is an example SLURM script to train a 70B model with GRPO on multiple nodes. This script trains a model on 4 nodes and uses the 5th node for vLLM-powered generation.
+
+```sh
+#!/bin/bash
+#SBATCH --nodes=5
+#SBATCH --gres=gpu:8
+
+# Get the list of allocated nodes
+NODELIST=($(scontrol show hostnames $SLURM_JOB_NODELIST))
+
+# Assign the first 4 nodes for training and the 5th node for vLLM
+TRAIN_NODES="${NODELIST[@]:0:4}"  # Nodes 0, 1, 2, 3 for training
+VLLM_NODE="${NODELIST[4]}"  # Node 4 for vLLM
+
+# Run training on the first 4 nodes (Group 1)
+srun --nodes=4 --ntasks=4 --nodelist="${NODELIST[@]:0:4}" accelerate launch \
+     --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
+     --num_processes 32 \
+     --num_machines 4 \
+     --main_process_ip ${NODELIST[0]} \
+     --machine_rank $SLURM_PROCID \
+     --rdzv_backend c10d \
+     train_grpo.py \
+     --server_ip $VLLM_NODE &
+
+# Run vLLM server on the 5th node (Group 2)
+srun --nodes=1 --ntasks=1 --nodelist="${NODELIST[4]}" trl vllm-serve --model Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B --tensor_parallel_size 8 &
+
+wait
+```
+
+```python
+import argparse
+
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import GRPOTrainer, GRPOConfig
+
+def main():
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
+    parser.add_argument("--vllm_server_host", type=str, default="", help="The server IP")
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    # Example dataset from TLDR
+    dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train")
+
+    # Dummy reward function: count the number of unique characters in the completions
+    def reward_num_unique_chars(completions, **kwargs):
+        return [len(set(c)) for c in completions]
+
+    training_args = GRPOConfig(
+        output_dir="Qwen2.5-72B-GRPO",
+        per_device_train_batch_size=4,
+        bf16=True,
+        gradient_checkpointing=True,
+        use_vllm=True,
+        vllm_server_host=args.vllm_server_host.replace("ip-", "").replace("-", "."),  # from ip-X-X-X-X to X.X.X.X
+    )
+
+    trainer = GRPOTrainer(model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B", args=training_args, reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_chars, train_dataset=dataset)
+    trainer.train()
+
+if __name__=="__main__":
+    main()
+```
+
+### Using a custom reward function
+
+The [`GRPOTrainer`] supports using custom reward functions instead of dense reward models. To ensure compatibility, your reward function must satisfy the following requirements:
+
+1. **Input arguments**:
+   - The function must accept the following as keyword arguments:
+     - `prompts` (contains the prompts),
+     - `completions` (contains the generated completions),
+     - `completions_ids` (contains the tokenized completions),
+     - `trainer_state` ([`~transformers.TrainerState`]): The current state of the trainer. This can be used to implement dynamic reward functions, such as curriculum learning, where the reward is adjusted based on the training progress.
+     - All column names (but `prompt`) that the dataset may have. For example, if the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`, the function will be called with `ground_truth` as a keyword argument.
+
+     The easiest way to comply with this requirement is to use `**kwargs` in the function signature.
+   - Depending on the dataset format, the input will vary:
+     - For [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of strings.
+     - For [conversational format](dataset_formats#conversational), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of message dictionaries.
+
+2. **Return value**: The function must return a list of floats. Each float represents the reward corresponding to a single completion.
+
+#### Example 1: Reward longer completions
+
+Below is an example of a reward function for a standard format that rewards longer completions:
+
+```python
+def reward_func(completions_ids, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that assigns higher scores to longer completions (in terms of token count)."""
+    return [float(len(ids)) for ids in completions_ids]
+```
+
+You can test it as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["The sky is", "The sun is"]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> completions = [" blue.", " in the sky."]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> completions_ids = [[6303, 13], [304, 279, 12884, 13]]
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, completions_ids=completions_ids)
+[2.0, 4.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 1.1: Reward longer completions (based on the number of characters)
+
+Same as the previous example, but this time the reward function is based on the number of characters instead of tokens.
+
+```python
+def reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that assigns higher scores to longer completions (in terms of character count)."""
+    return [float(len(completion)) for completion in completions]
+```
+
+You can test it as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["The sky is", "The sun is"]
+>>> completions = [" blue.", " in the sky."]
+>>> completions_ids = [[6303, 13], [304, 279, 12884, 13]]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, completions_ids=completions_ids)
+[6.0, 12.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 2: Reward completions with a specific format
+
+Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format. This example is inspired by the _format reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
+It is designed for a conversational format, where prompts and completions consist of structured messages.
+
+```python
+import re
+
+def format_reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format."""
+    pattern = r"^<think>.*?</think><answer>.*?</answer>$"
+    completion_contents = [completion[0]["content"] for completion in completions]
+    matches = [re.match(pattern, content) for content in completion_contents]
+    return [1.0 if match else 0.0 for match in matches]
+```
+
+You can test this function as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = [
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "What is the result of (1 + 2) * 4?"}],
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "What is the result of (3 + 1) * 2?"}],
+... ]
+>>> completions = [
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "<think>The sum of 1 and 2 is 3, which we multiply by 4 to get 12.</think><answer>(1 + 2) * 4 = 12</answer>"}],
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "The sum of 3 and 1 is 4, which we multiply by 2 to get 8. So (3 + 1) * 2 = 8."}],
+... ]
+>>> format_reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions)
+[1.0, 0.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 3: Reward completions based on a reference
+
+Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion is correct. This example is inspired by the _accuracy reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
+This example is designed for [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), where the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`.
+
+```python
+import re
+
+def reward_func(completions, ground_truth, **kwargs):
+    # Regular expression to capture content inside \boxed{}
+    matches = [re.search(r"\\boxed\{(.*?)\}", completion) for completion in completions]
+    contents = [match.group(1) if match else "" for match in matches]
+    # Reward 1 if the content is the same as the ground truth, 0 otherwise
+    return [1.0 if c == gt else 0.0 for c, gt in zip(contents, ground_truth)]
+```
+
+You can test this function as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["Problem: Solve the equation $2x + 3 = 7$. Solution:", "Problem: Solve the equation $3x - 5 = 10$."]
+>>> completions = [r" The solution is \boxed{2}.", r" The solution is \boxed{6}."]
+>>> ground_truth = ["2", "5"]
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, ground_truth=ground_truth)
+[1.0, 0.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 4: Multi-task reward functions
+
+Below is an example of using multiple reward functions in the [`GRPOTrainer`]. In this example, we define two task-specific reward functions: `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func`. The `math_reward_func` rewards math problems based on their correctness, while the `coding_reward_func` rewards coding problems based on whether the solution works.
+
+```python
+from datasets import Dataset
+from trl import GRPOTrainer
+
+# Define a dataset that contains both math and coding problems
+dataset = Dataset.from_list(
+    [
+        {"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "task": "math"},
+        {"prompt": "Write a function that returns the sum of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
+        {"prompt": "What is 3*4?", "task": "math"},
+        {"prompt": "Write a function that returns the product of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
+    ]
+)
+
+# Math-specific reward function
+def math_reward_func(prompts, completions, task, **kwargs):
+    rewards = []
+    for prompt, completion, t in zip(prompts, completions, task):
+        if t == "math":
+            # Calculate math-specific reward
+            correct = check_math_solution(prompt, completion)
+            reward = 1.0 if correct else -1.0
+            rewards.append(reward)
+        else:
+            # Return None for non-math tasks
+            rewards.append(None)
+    return rewards
+
+# Coding-specific reward function
+def coding_reward_func(prompts, completions, task, **kwargs):
+    rewards = []
+    for prompt, completion, t in zip(prompts, completions, task):
+        if t == "coding":
+            # Calculate coding-specific reward
+            works = test_code_solution(prompt, completion)
+            reward = 1.0 if works else -1.0
+            rewards.append(reward)
+        else:
+            # Return None for non-coding tasks
+            rewards.append(None)
+    return rewards
+
+# Use both task-specific reward functions
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+    reward_funcs=[math_reward_func, coding_reward_func],
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+In this example, the `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func` are designed to work with a mixed dataset that contains both math and coding problems. The `task` column in the dataset is used to determine which reward function to apply to each problem. If there is no relevant reward function for a sample in the dataset, the reward function will return `None`, and the [`GRPOTrainer`] will continue with the valid functions and tasks. This allows the [`GRPOTrainer`] to handle multiple reward functions with different applicability.
+
+Note that the [`GRPOTrainer`] will ignore the `None` rewards returned by the reward functions and only consider the rewards returned by the relevant functions. This ensures that the model is trained on the relevant tasks and ignores the tasks for which there is no relevant reward function.
+
+#### Passing the reward function to the trainer
+
+To use your custom reward function, pass it to the [`GRPOTrainer`] as follows:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOTrainer
+
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    reward_funcs=reward_func,
+    ...,
+)
+```
+
+If you have multiple reward functions, you can pass them as a list:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOTrainer
+
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    reward_funcs=[reward_func1, reward_func2],
+    ...,
+)
+```
+
+and the reward will be computed as the sum of the rewards from each function, or the weighted sum if `reward_weights` is provided in the config.
+
+Note that [`GRPOTrainer`] supports multiple reward functions of different types. See the parameters documentation for more details.
+
+## Vision-Language Model (VLM) Training
+
+GRPO supports training Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on multimodal datasets containing both text and images.
+
+### Supported Models
+
+Tested with:
+
+- **Gemma3** — e.g., `google/gemma-3-4b-it`
+- **LLaVA-NeXT** — e.g., `llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf`
+- **Qwen2-VL** — e.g., `Qwen/Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct`
+- **Qwen2.5-VL** — e.g., `Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct`
+- **SmolVLM2** — e.g., `HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM2-2.2B-Instruct`
+  
+> [!TIP]
+> Compatibility with all VLMs is not guaranteed. If you believe a model should be supported, feel free to open an issue on GitHub — or better yet, submit a pull request with the required changes.
+
+### Quick Start
+
+Use [grpo\_vlm.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py) to fine-tune a VLM. Example command for training on [`lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified):
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch \
+  --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
+  examples/scripts/grpo_vlm.py \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct \
+  --output_dir grpo-Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct \
+  --learning_rate 1e-5 \
+  --gradient_checkpointing \
+  --dtype bfloat16 \
+  --max_prompt_length 2048 \
+  --max_completion_length 1024 \
+  --use_vllm \
+  --vllm_mode colocate \
+  --use_peft \
+  --lora_target_modules "q_proj", "v_proj" \
+  --log_completions
+```
+
+### Configuration Tips
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> VLM training may fail if image tokens are truncated. We highly recommend disabling truncation by setting `max_prompt_length` to `None`.
+
+- Use LoRA on vision-language projection layers
+- Enable 4-bit quantization to reduce memory usage
+- VLMs are memory-intensive — start with smaller batch sizes
+- Most models are compatible with vLLM (`server` and `colocate` modes)
+
+### Dataset Format
+
+Each training sample should include:
+
+- `prompt`: Text formatted via the processor's chat template
+- `image`/`images`: PIL Image or list of PIL Images
+
+The trainer automatically handles image-to-tensor conversion via the model’s image processor.
+
+## GRPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] GRPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## GRPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] GRPOConfig

docs/source/how_to_train.md

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
-# Training FAQ
-
-## What Metrics Should I Look at?
-
-When performing classical supervised fine-tuning of language models, the loss (especially the validation loss) serves as a good indicator of the training progress. However, in Reinforcement Learning (RL), the loss becomes less informative about the model's performance, and its value may fluctuate while the actual performance improves.
-
-To address this, we recommend focusing on two key metrics first:
-
-**Mean Reward**: The primary goal is to maximize the reward achieved by the model during RL training.
-**Objective KL Divergence**: KL divergence (Kullback-Leibler divergence) measures the dissimilarity between two probability distributions. In the context of RL training, we use it to quantify the difference between the current model and a reference model. Ideally, we want to keep the KL divergence between 0 and 10 to ensure the model's generated text remains close to what the reference model produces.
-
-However, there are more metrics that can be useful for debugging, checkout the [logging section](logging).
-
-## Why Do We Use a Reference Model, and What's the Purpose of KL Divergence?
-
-When training RL models, optimizing solely for reward may lead to unexpected behaviors, where the model exploits the environment in ways that don't align with good language generation. In the case of RLHF, we use a reward model trained to predict whether a generated text is highly ranked by humans.
-
-However, the RL model being optimized against the reward model may learn patterns that yield high reward but do not represent good language. This can result in extreme cases where the model generates texts with excessive exclamation marks or emojis to maximize the reward. In some worst-case scenarios, the model may generate patterns completely unrelated to natural language yet receive high rewards, similar to adversarial attacks.
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/kl-example.png">
-<p style="text-align: center;"> <b>Figure:</b> Samples without a KL penalty from <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf">https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08593.pdf</a>. </p>
-</div>
-
-To address this issue, we add a penalty to the reward function based on the KL divergence between the current model and the reference model. By doing this, we encourage the model to stay close to what the reference model generates.
-
-## What Is the Concern with Negative KL Divergence?
-
-If you generate text by purely sampling from the model distribution things work fine in general. But when you use the `generate` method there are a few caveats because it does not always purely sample depending on the settings which can cause KL-divergence to go negative. Essentially when the active model achieves `log_p_token_active < log_p_token_ref` we get negative KL-div. This can happen in a several cases:
-
-- **top-k sampling**: the model can smooth out the probability distribution causing the top-k tokens having a smaller probability than those of the reference model but they still are selected
-- **min_length**: this ignores the EOS token until `min_length` is reached. thus the model can assign a very low log prob to the EOS token and very high probs to all others until min_length is reached
-- **min_length**: this ignores the EOS token until `min_length` is reached, thus the model can assign a very low log prob to the EOS token and very high probs to all others until min_length is reached
-
-These are just a few examples. Why is negative KL an issue? The total reward `R` is computed `R = r - beta * KL` so if the model can learn how to drive KL-divergence negative it effectively gets a positive reward. In many cases it can be much easier to exploit such a bug in the generation than actually learning the reward function. In addition the KL can become arbitrarily small thus the actual reward can be very small compared to it.
-
-So how should you generate text for PPO training? Let's have a look!
-
-## How to generate text for training?
-
-In order to avoid the KL issues described above we recommend to use the following settings:
-
-```python
-generation_kwargs = {
-    "min_length": -1, # don't ignore the EOS token (see above)
-    "top_k": 0.0, # no top-k sampling
-    "top_p": 1.0, # no nucleus sampling
-    "do_sample": True, # yes, we want to sample
-    "pad_token_id": tokenizer.eos_token_id, # most decoder models don't have a padding token - use EOS token instead
-    "max_new_tokens": 32, # specify how many tokens you want to generate at most
-}
-```
-
-With these settings we usually don't encounter any issues. You can also experiments with other settings but if you encounter issues with negative KL-divergence try to go back to these and see if they persist.
-
-## How can debug your own use-case?
-
-Debugging the RL pipeline can be challenging due to its complexity. Here are some tips and suggestions to make the process easier:
-
-- **Start from a working example**: Begin with a working example from the trl repository and gradually modify it to fit your specific use-case. Changing everything at once can make it difficult to identify the source of potential issues. For example, you can start by replacing the model in the example and once you figure out the best hyperparameters try to switch to your dataset and reward model. If you change everything at once you won't know where a potential problem comes from.
-- **Start small, scale later**: Training large models can be very slow and take several hours or days until you see any improvement. For debugging this is not a convenient timescale so try to use small model variants during the development phase and scale up once that works. That being said you sometimes have to be careful as small models might not have the capacity to solve a complicated task either.
-- **Start simple**: Try to start with a minimal example and build complexity from there. Your use-case might require for example a complicated reward function consisting of many different rewards - try to use one signal first and see if you can optimize that and then add more complexity after that.
-- **Inspect the generations**: It's always a good idea to inspect what the model is generating. Maybe there is a big in your post-processing or your prompt. Due to bad settings you might cut-off generations too soon. These things are very hard to see on the metrics but very obvious if you look at the generations.
-- **Inspect the reward model**: If you reward is not improving over time maybe there's an issue with the reward model. You can look at extreme cases to see if it does what it should: e.g. in the sentiment case you can check if simple positive and negative examples really get different rewards. And you can look at the distribution of your dataset. Finally, maybe the reward is dominated by the query which the model can't affect so you might need to normalize this (e.g. reward of query+response minus reward of the query).
-
-These are just a few tips that we find helpful - if you have more useful tricks feel free to open a PR to add them as well!

docs/source/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+<div style="text-align: center">
+<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/trl_banner_dark.png">
+</div>
+
+# TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
+
+TRL is a full stack library where we provide a set of tools to train transformer language models with methods like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Reward Modeling, and more.
+The library is integrated with 🤗 [transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers).
+
+Below is the current list of TRL trainers, organized by method type (⚡️ = vLLM support).
+
+## Taxonomy
+
+<div style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between; width: 100%; gap: 2rem;">
+<div style="flex: 1; min-width: 0;">
+
+### Online methods
+
+- [`GRPOTrainer`] ⚡️
+- [`RLOOTrainer`] ⚡️
+- [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] ⚡️
+- [`NashMDTrainer`] ⚡️
+- [`XPOTrainer`] ⚡️
+- [`PPOTrainer`]
+
+### Reward modeling
+
+- [`PRMTrainer`]
+- [`RewardTrainer`]
+
+</div>
+<div style="flex: 1; min-width: 0;">
+
+### Offline methods
+
+- [`SFTTrainer`]
+- [`DPOTrainer`]
+- [`ORPOTrainer`]
+- [`BCOTrainer`]
+- [`CPOTrainer`]
+- [`KTOTrainer`]
+
+### Knowledge distillation
+
+- [`GKDTrainer`]
+
+</div>
+</div>
+
+## 🎉 What's New
+
+**✨ OpenAI GPT OSS Support**: TRL now fully supports fine-tuning the latest [OpenAI GPT OSS models](https://huggingface.co/collections/openai/gpt-oss-68911959590a1634ba11c7a4)! Check out the:
+
+- [OpenAI Cookbook](https://cookbook.openai.com/articles/gpt-oss/fine-tune-transfomers)
+- [GPT OSS recipes](https://github.com/huggingface/gpt-oss-recipes)
+- [Our example script](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/sft_gpt_oss.py)
+
+You can also explore TRL-related models, datasets, and demos in the [TRL Hugging Face organization](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib).
+
+## Learn
+
+Learn post-training with TRL and other libraries in 🤗 [smol course](https://github.com/huggingface/smol-course).
+
+## Contents
+
+The documentation is organized into the following sections:
+
+- **Getting Started**: installation and quickstart guide.
+- **Conceptual Guides**: dataset formats, training FAQ, and understanding logs.
+- **How-to Guides**: reducing memory usage, speeding up training, distributing training, etc.
+- **Integrations**: DeepSpeed, Liger Kernel, PEFT, etc.
+- **Examples**: example overview, community tutorials, etc.
+- **API**: trainers, utils, etc.
+
+## Blog posts
+
+<div class="mt-10">
+  <div class="w-full flex flex-col space-y-4 md:space-y-0 md:grid md:grid-cols-2 md:gap-y-4 md:gap-x-5">
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-vlm-alignment">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/trl_vlm/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on August 7, 2025</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Vision Language Model Alignment in TRL ⚡️</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/vllm-colocate">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/vllm-colocate/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on June 3, 2025</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">NO GPU left behind: Unlocking Efficiency with Co-located vLLM in TRL</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/liger-grpo">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/liger-grpo/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on May 25, 2025</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">🐯 Liger GRPO meets TRL</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/open-r1">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/open-r1/thumbnails.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on January 28, 2025</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Open-R1: a fully open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/dpo_vlm">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/dpo_vlm/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on July 10, 2024</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Preference Optimization for Vision Language Models with TRL</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/putting_rl_back_in_rlhf_with_rloo">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/putting_rl_back_in_rlhf_with_rloo/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on June 12, 2024</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Putting RL back in RLHF</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-ddpo">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/166_trl_ddpo/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on September 29, 2023</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Finetune Stable Diffusion Models with DDPO via TRL</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/dpo-trl">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/157_dpo_trl/dpo_thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on August 8, 2023</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Fine-tune Llama 2 with DPO</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/stackllama">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/138_stackllama/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on April 5, 2023</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">StackLLaMA: A hands-on guide to train LLaMA with RLHF</p>
+   </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-peft">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/133_trl_peft/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on March 9, 2023</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Fine-tuning 20B LLMs with RLHF on a 24GB consumer GPU</p>
+    </a>
+    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/rlhf">
+      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/120_rlhf/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail" class="mt-0">
+      <p class="text-gray-500 text-sm">Published on December 9, 2022</p>
+      <p class="text-gray-700">Illustrating Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback</p>
+    </a>
+  </div>
+</div>

docs/source/index.mdx

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl_banner_dark.png">
-</div>
-
-# TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
-
-TRL is a full stack library where we provide a set of tools to train transformer language models with Reinforcement Learning, from the Supervised Fine-tuning step (SFT), Reward Modeling step (RM) to the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) step. 
-The library is integrated with 🤗 [transformers](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers).
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/TRL-readme.png">
-</div>
-
-Check the appropriate sections of the documentation depending on your needs:
-
-## API documentation
-
-- [Model Classes](models): *A brief overview of what each public model class does.*
-- [`SFTTrainer`](sft_trainer): *Supervise Fine-tune your model easily with `SFTTrainer`*
-- [`RewardTrainer`](reward_trainer): *Train easily your reward model using `RewardTrainer`.*
-- [`PPOTrainer`](ppo_trainer): *Further fine-tune the supervised fine-tuned model using PPO algorithm*
-- [Best-of-N Sampling](best-of-n): *Use best of n sampling as an alternative way to sample predictions from your active model*
-- [`DPOTrainer`](dpo_trainer): *Direct Preference Optimization training using `DPOTrainer`.*
-- [`TextEnvironment`](text_environment): *Text environment to train your model using tools with RL.*
-
-## Examples
-
-- [Sentiment Tuning](sentiment_tuning): *Fine tune your model to generate positive movie contents*
-- [Training with PEFT](lora_tuning_peft): *Memory efficient RLHF training using adapters with PEFT*
-- [Detoxifying LLMs](detoxifying_a_lm): *Detoxify your language model through RLHF*
-- [StackLlama](using_llama_models): *End-to-end RLHF training of a Llama model on Stack exchange dataset*
-- [Learning with Tools](learning_tools): *Walkthrough of using `TextEnvironments`*
-- [Multi-Adapter Training](multi_adapter_rl): *Use a single base model and multiple adapters for memory efficient end-to-end training*
-
-
-## Blog posts
-
-<div class="mt-10">
-  <div class="w-full flex flex-col space-y-4 md:space-y-0 md:grid md:grid-cols-2 md:gap-y-4 md:gap-x-5">
-    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/rlhf">
-      <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/blog/main/assets/120_rlhf/thumbnail.png" alt="thumbnail">
-      <p class="text-gray-700">Illustrating Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback</p>
-    </a>
-    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-peft">
-      <img src="https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/assets/133_trl_peft/thumbnail.png?raw=true" alt="thumbnail">
-      <p class="text-gray-700">Fine-tuning 20B LLMs with RLHF on a 24GB consumer GPU</p>
-    </a>
-    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/stackllama">
-      <img src="https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/assets/138_stackllama/thumbnail.png?raw=true" alt="thumbnail">
-      <p class="text-gray-700">StackLLaMA: A hands-on guide to train LLaMA with RLHF</p>
-   </a>
-    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/dpo-trl">
-      <img src="https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/assets/157_dpo_trl/dpo_thumbnail.png?raw=true" alt="thumbnail">
-      <p class="text-gray-700">Fine-tune Llama 2 with DPO</p>
-    </a>
-    <a class="!no-underline border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow hover:shadow-lg" href="https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-ddpo">
-      <img src="https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/assets/166_trl_ddpo/thumbnail.png?raw=true" alt="thumbnail">
-      <p class="text-gray-700">Finetune Stable Diffusion Models with DDPO via TRL</p>
-    </a>
-  </div>
-</div>

docs/source/installation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Installation
+
+You can install TRL either from PyPI or from source:
+
+## PyPI
+
+Install the library with pip or [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/):
+
+<hfoptions id="install">
+<hfoption id="uv">
+
+uv is a fast Rust-based Python package and project manager. Refer to [Installation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/) for installation instructions.
+
+```bash
+uv pip install trl
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="pip">
+
+```bash
+pip install trl
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+## Source
+
+You can also install the latest version from source. First clone the repo and then run the installation with `pip`:
+
+```bash
+git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
+cd trl/
+pip install -e .
+```
+
+If you want the development install you can replace the pip install with the following:
+
+```bash
+pip install -e ".[dev]"
+```

docs/source/installation.mdx

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-# Installation
-You can install TRL either from pypi or from source:
-
-## pypi
-Install the library with pip:
-
-```bash
-pip install trl
-```
-
-### Source
-You can also install the latest version from source. First clone the repo and then run the installation with `pip`:
-
-```bash
-git clone https://github.com/huggingface/trl.git
-cd trl/
-pip install -e .
-```
-
-If you want the development install you can replace the pip install with the following:
-
-```bash
-pip install -e ".[dev]"
-```

docs/source/iterative_sft_trainer.mdx

@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-# Iterative Trainer
-
-Iterative fine-tuning is a training method that enables to perform custom actions (generation and filtering for example) between optimization steps. In TRL we provide an easy-to-use API to fine-tune your models in an iterative way in just a few lines of code.
-
-## Usage
-
-To get started quickly, instantiate an instance a model, and a tokenizer.
-
-```python
-
-model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
-if tokenizer.pad_token is None:
-    tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
-
-trainer = IterativeSFTTrainer(
-    model,
-    tokenizer
-)
-
-```
-
-You have the choice to either provide a list of strings or a list of tensors to the step function. 
-
-#### Using a list of tensors as input:
-
-```python
-
-inputs = {
-    "input_ids": input_ids,
-    "attention_mask": attention_mask
-}
-
-trainer.step(**inputs)
-
-```
-
-#### Using a list of strings as input:
-
-```python
-
-inputs = {
-    "texts": texts
-}
-
-trainer.step(**inputs)
-
-```
-
-For causal language models, labels will automatically be created from input_ids or from texts. When using sequence to sequence models you will have to provide your own labels or text_labels.
-
-## IterativeTrainer
-
-[[autodoc]] IterativeSFTTrainer

docs/source/jobs_training.md

@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
+# Training with Jobs
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-HF_Jobs-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=hf_jobs,trl)
+
+[Hugging Face Jobs](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs) lets you run training scripts on fully managed infrastructure—no need to manage GPUs or local environment setup.
+
+In this guide, you'll learn how to:
+
+* Use [TRL Jobs](https://github.com/huggingface/trl-jobs) to easily run pre-optimized TRL training
+* Run any TRL training script with uv scripts
+
+For general details about Hugging Face Jobs (hardware selection, job monitoring, etc.), see the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs).
+
+## Requirements
+
+* A [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan
+* Logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`)
+
+## Using TRL Jobs
+
+[TRL Jobs](https://github.com/huggingface/trl-jobs) is a high-level wrapper around Hugging Face Jobs and TRL that streamlines training. It provides optimized default configurations so you can start quickly without manually tuning parameters.
+
+Example:
+
+```bash
+pip install trl-jobs
+trl-jobs sft --model_name Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B --dataset_name trl-lib/Capybara
+```
+
+TRL Jobs supports everything covered in this guide, with additional optimizations to simplify workflows.
+
+## Using uv Scripts
+
+For more control, you can run Hugging Face Jobs directly with your own scripts, using [uv scripts](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/scripts/).
+
+Create a Python script (e.g., `train.py`) containing your training code:
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import SFTTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
+trainer = SFTTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+trainer.push_to_hub("Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT")
+```
+
+Launch the job using either the [`hf jobs` CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/cli#hf-jobs) or the Python API:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --with trl \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    train.py
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+
+run_uv_job(
+    "train.py",
+    dependencies=["trl"],
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+To run successfully, the script needs:
+
+* **TRL installed**: Use the `--with trl` flag or the `dependencies` argument. uv installs these dependencies automatically before running the script.
+* **An authentication token**: Required to push the trained model (or perform other authenticated operations). Provide it with the `--secrets HF_TOKEN` flag or the `secrets` argument.
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> When training with Jobs, be sure to:
+>
+> * **Set a sufficient timeout**. Jobs time out after 30 minutes by default. If your job exceeds the timeout, it will fail and all progress will be lost. See [Setting a custom timeout](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/guides/jobs#setting-a-custom-timeout).
+> * **Push the model to the Hub**. The Jobs environment is ephemeral—files are deleted when the job ends. If you don’t push the model, it will be lost.
+
+You can also run a script directly from a URL:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --with trl \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/qgallouedec/eb6a7d20bd7d56f9c440c3c8c56d2307/raw/69fd78a179e19af115e4a54a1cdedd2a6c237f2f/train.py"
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+
+run_uv_job(
+    "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/qgallouedec/eb6a7d20bd7d56f9c440c3c8c56d2307/raw/69fd78a179e19af115e4a54a1cdedd2a6c237f2f/train.py",
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    dependencies=["trl"],
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+To make a script self-contained, declare dependencies at the top:
+
+```python
+# /// script
+# dependencies = [
+#     "trl",
+#     "peft",
+# ]
+# ///
+
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from peft import LoraConfig
+from trl import SFTTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
+
+trainer = SFTTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    peft_config=LoraConfig(),
+)
+trainer.train()
+trainer.push_to_hub("Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT")
+```
+
+You can then run the script without specifying dependencies:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    train.py
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+
+run_uv_job(
+    "train.py",
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+TRL example scripts are fully uv-compatible, so you can run a complete training workflow directly on Jobs. You can customize training with standard script arguments plus hardware and secrets:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/refs/heads/main/examples/scripts/prm.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/prm800k \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-Reward \
+    --push_to_hub
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+run_uv_job(
+    "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/refs/heads/main/examples/scripts/prm.py",
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+    script_args=[
+        "--model_name_or_path", "Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+        "--dataset_name", "trl-lib/prm800k",
+        "--output_dir", "Qwen2-0.5B-Reward",
+        "--push_to_hub"
+    ]
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+See the full list of examples in [Maintained examples](example_overview#maintained-examples).
+
+### Docker Images
+
+An up-to-date Docker image with all TRL dependencies is available at [huggingface/trl](https://hub.docker.com/r/huggingface/trl) and can be used directly with Hugging Face Jobs:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    --image huggingface/trl \
+    train.py
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+
+run_uv_job(
+    "train.py",
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+    image="huggingface/trl",
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+Jobs runs on a Docker image from Hugging Face Spaces or Docker Hub, so you can also specify any custom image:
+
+<hfoptions id="script_type">
+<hfoption id="bash">
+
+```bash
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    --image <docker-image> \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    train.py
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+```python
+from huggingface_hub import run_uv_job
+
+run_uv_job(
+    "train.py",
+    flavor="a100-large",
+    secrets={"HF_TOKEN": "hf_..."},
+    image="<docker-image>",
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>

docs/source/judges.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Judges
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> TRL Judges is an experimental API which is subject to change at any time.
+
+TRL provides judges to easily compare two completions.
+
+Make sure to have installed the required dependencies by running:
+
+```bash
+pip install trl[judges]
+```
+
+## Using the provided judges
+
+TRL provides several judges out of the box. For example, you can use the [`HfPairwiseJudge`] to compare two completions using a pre-trained model from the Hugging Face model hub:
+
+```python
+from trl import HfPairwiseJudge
+
+judge = HfPairwiseJudge()
+judge.judge(
+    prompts=["What is the capital of France?", "What is the biggest planet in the solar system?"],
+    completions=[["Paris", "Lyon"], ["Saturn", "Jupiter"]],
+)  # Outputs: [0, 1]
+```
+
+## Define your own judge
+
+To define your own judge, we provide several base classes that you can subclass. For rank-based judges, you need to subclass [`BaseRankJudge`] and implement the [`BaseRankJudge.judge`] method. For pairwise judges, you need to subclass [`BasePairJudge`] and implement the [`BasePairJudge.judge`] method. If you want to define a judge that doesn't fit into these categories, you need to subclass [`BaseJudge`] and implement the [`BaseJudge.judge`] method.
+
+As an example, let's define a pairwise judge that prefers shorter completions:
+
+```python
+from trl import BasePairwiseJudge
+
+class PrefersShorterJudge(BasePairwiseJudge):
+    def judge(self, prompts, completions, shuffle_order=False):
+        return [0 if len(completion[0]) > len(completion[1]) else 1 for completion in completions]
+```
+
+You can then use this judge as follows:
+
+```python
+judge = PrefersShorterJudge()
+judge.judge(
+    prompts=["What is the capital of France?", "What is the biggest planet in the solar system?"],
+    completions=[["Paris", "The capital of France is Paris."], ["Jupiter is the biggest planet in the solar system.", "Jupiter"]],
+)  # Outputs: [0, 1]
+```
+
+## Provided judges
+
+### PairRMJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] PairRMJudge
+
+### HfPairwiseJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] HfPairwiseJudge
+
+### OpenAIPairwiseJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] OpenAIPairwiseJudge
+
+### AllTrueJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] AllTrueJudge
+
+## Base classes
+
+### BaseJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] BaseJudge
+
+### BaseBinaryJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] BaseBinaryJudge
+
+### BaseRankJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] BaseRankJudge
+
+### BasePairwiseJudge
+
+[[autodoc]] BasePairwiseJudge

docs/source/kernels_hub.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# Kernels Hub Integration and Usage
+
+<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4b5175f3-1d60-455b-8664-43b2495ee1c3" width="450" height="450" alt="kernel-builder logo">
+
+The [`kernels`](https://huggingface.co/blog/hello-hf-kernels#get-started-and-next-steps) library allows optimized compute kernels to be loaded directly from the Hub.  
+You can find `kernels` in [dedicated orgs](https://huggingface.co/kernels-community) or by searching for the [`kernel` tag](https://huggingface.co/models?other=kernel) within the Hub.  
+
+Kernels are **optimized code pieces** that help in model development, training, and inference. Here, we’ll focus on their **integration with TRL**, but check out the above resources to learn more about them.
+
+## Installation
+
+To use kernels with TRL, you'd need to install the library in your Python environment:
+
+```bash
+pip install kernels
+```
+
+## Using Kernels from the Hub in TRL
+
+Kernels can directly replace attention implementations, removing the need to manually compile attention backends like Flash Attention and boosting training speed just by pulling the respective attention kernel from the Hub.
+
+You can specify a kernel when loading a model:
+
+
+```python
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
+    "your-model-name",
+    attn_implementation="kernels-community/flash-attn"  # other options: kernels-community/vllm-flash-attn3, kernels-community/paged-attention
+)
+```
+
+Or when running a TRL training script:
+
+```bash
+python sft.py ... --attn_implementation kernels-community/flash-attn
+```
+
+Or using the TRL CLI:
+
+```bash
+trl sft ... --attn_implementation kernels-community/flash-attn
+```
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Now you can leverage faster attention backends with a pre-optimized kernel for your hardware configuration from the Hub, speeding up both development and training.
+
+## Comparing Attention Implementations
+
+We evaluated various attention implementations available in transformers, along with different kernel backends, using **TRL** and **SFT**.  
+The experiments were run on a single **H100 GPU** with **CUDA 12.9**, leveraging **Qwen3-8B** with a **batch size of 8**, **gradient accumulation of 1**, and **bfloat16** precision.  
+Keep in mind that the results shown here are specific to this setup and may vary with different training configurations.
+
+The following figure illustrates both **latency** (time per training step) and **peak allocated memory** for the different attention implementations and kernel backends.  
+Kernel-based implementations perform on par with custom-installed attention, and increasing the model’s `max_length` further enhances performance. Memory consumption is similar across all implementations, showing no significant differences. We get the same performance but with less friction, as described in [the following section](#flash-attention-vs-hub-kernels).
+
+<div class="flex justify-center">
+  <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/kernels_guide_latency.png" alt="Latency and Memory Usage" width="45%"/>
+  <img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/kernels_guide_peak_allocated_memory.png" alt="Latency and Memory Usage" width="45%"/>
+</div>
+
+## Flash Attention vs. Hub Kernels
+
+Building Flash Attention from source can be time-consuming, often taking anywhere from several minutes to hours, depending on your hardware, CUDA/PyTorch configuration, and whether precompiled wheels are available.  
+
+In contrast, **Hugging Face Kernels** provide a much faster and more reliable workflow. Developers don’t need to worry about complex setups—everything is handled automatically. In our benchmarks, kernels were ready to use in about **2.5 seconds**, with no compilation required. This allows you to start training almost instantly, significantly accelerating development. Simply specify the desired version, and `kernels` takes care of the rest.
+
+## Combining FlashAttention Kernels with Liger Kernels
+
+You can combine **FlashAttention kernels** with **Liger kernels** for additional TRL performance improvements.
+
+First, install the Liger kernel dependency:
+
+```bash
+pip install liger-kernel
+```
+
+Then, combine both in your code:
+
+```python
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
+    "your-model-name",
+    attn_implementation="kernels-community/flash-attn"  # choose the desired FlashAttention variant
+)
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    use_liger_kernel=True,
+    # ... other TRL training args
+)
+```
+
+Learn more about the [Liger Kernel Integration](./liger_kernel_integration).

docs/source/kto_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+# KTO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-KTO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=kto,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO) was introduced in [KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.01306) by [Kawin Ethayarajh](https://huggingface.co/kawine), [Winnie Xu](https://huggingface.co/xwinxu), [Niklas Muennighoff](https://huggingface.co/Muennighoff), Dan Jurafsky, [Douwe Kiela](https://huggingface.co/douwekiela).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Kahneman & Tversky's prospect theory tells us that humans perceive random variables in a biased but well-defined manner; for example, humans are famously loss-averse. We show that objectives for aligning LLMs with human feedback implicitly incorporate many of these biases -- the success of these objectives (e.g., DPO) over cross-entropy minimization can partly be ascribed to them being human-aware loss functions (HALOs). However, the utility functions these methods attribute to humans still differ from those in the prospect theory literature. Using a Kahneman-Tversky model of human utility, we propose a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, as current methods do. We call this approach Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO), and it matches or exceeds the performance of preference-based methods at scales from 1B to 30B. Crucially, KTO does not need preferences -- only a binary signal of whether an output is desirable or undesirable for a given input. This makes it far easier to use in the real world, where preference data is scarce and expensive.
+
+The official code can be found in [ContextualAI/HALOs](https://github.com/ContextualAI/HALOs).
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif), [Younes Belkada](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada), [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun) and Pablo Vicente.
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the KTO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [KTO Mix 14k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/kto-mix-14k). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/kto-mix-14k/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_kto.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import KTOConfig, KTOTrainer
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/kto-mix-14k", split="train")
+
+training_args = KTOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-KTO")
+trainer = KTOTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_kto.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 x H100 GPUs, the training takes approximately 30 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
+
+![kto qwen2 reward margin](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/kto-qwen2-reward-margin.png)
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-KTO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
+
+<pre><code>$ transformers chat trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-KTO
+<strong><span style="color: red;">&lt;quentin_gallouedec&gt;:</span></strong>
+What is the best programming language?
+
+<strong><span style="color: blue;">&lt;trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-KTO&gt;:</span></strong>
+The best programming language can vary depending on individual preferences, industry-specific requirements, technical skills, and familiarity with the specific use case or task. Here are some widely-used programming languages that have been noted as popular and widely used:
+
+Here are some other factors to consider when choosing a programming language for a project:
+
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">1</span> JavaScript</strong>: JavaScript is at the heart of the web and can be used for building web applications, APIs, and interactive front-end applications like frameworks like React and Angular. It's similar to C, C++, and F# in syntax structure and is accessible and easy to learn, making it a popular choice for beginners and professionals alike.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">2</span> Java</strong>: Known for its object-oriented programming (OOP) and support for Java 8 and .NET, Java is used for developing enterprise-level software applications, high-performance games, as well as mobile apps, game development, and desktop applications.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">3</span> C++</strong>: Known for its flexibility and scalability, C++ offers comprehensive object-oriented programming and is a popular choice for high-performance computing and other technical fields. It's a powerful platform for building real-world applications and games at scale.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">4</span> Python</strong>: Developed by Guido van Rossum in 1991, Python is a high-level, interpreted, and dynamically typed language known for its simplicity, readability, and versatility.
+</code></pre>
+
+## Expected dataset format
+
+KTO requires an [unpaired preference dataset](dataset_formats#unpaired-preference). Alternatively, you can provide a *paired* preference dataset (also known simply as a *preference dataset*). In this case, the trainer will automatically convert it to an unpaired format by separating the chosen and rejected responses, assigning `label = True` to the chosen completions and `label = False` to the rejected ones.
+
+The [`KTOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+In theory, the dataset should contain at least one chosen and one rejected completion. However, some users have successfully run KTO using *only* chosen or only rejected data. If using only rejected data, it is advisable to adopt a conservative learning rate.
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the KTO method. The script is available in [`trl/scripts/kto.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/scripts/kto.py)
+
+To test the KTO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/kto-mix-14k), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch trl/scripts/kto.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/kto-mix-14k \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-KTO
+```
+
+## Usage tips
+
+### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
+
+MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.  
+To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
+
+This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).  
+To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
+
+### Batch size recommendations
+
+Use a per-step batch size that is at least 4, and an effective batch size between 16 and 128. Even if your effective batch size is large, if your per-step batch size is poor, then the KL estimate in KTO will be poor.
+
+### Learning rate recommendations
+
+Each choice of `beta` has a maximum learning rate it can tolerate before learning performance degrades. For the default setting of `beta = 0.1`, the learning rate should typically not exceed `1e-6` for most models. As `beta` decreases, the learning rate should also be reduced accordingly. In general, we strongly recommend keeping the learning rate between `5e-7` and `5e-6`. Even with small datasets, we advise against using a learning rate outside this range. Instead, opt for more epochs to achieve better results.
+
+### Imbalanced data
+
+The `desirable_weight` and `undesirable_weight` of the [`KTOConfig`] refer to the weights placed on the losses for desirable/positive and undesirable/negative examples.
+By default, they are both 1. However, if you have more of one or the other, then you should upweight the less common type such that the ratio of (`desirable_weight`  \\(\times\\) number of positives) to (`undesirable_weight`  \\(\times\\) number of negatives) is in the range 1:1 to 4:3.
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+- `rewards/chosen_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
+- `rewards/rejected_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
+- `logps/chosen_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the chosen completions
+- `logps/rejected_sum`: the sum of log probabilities of the rejected completions
+- `logits/chosen_sum`: the sum of logits of the chosen completions
+- `logits/rejected_sum`: the sum of logits of the rejected completions
+- `count/chosen`: the count of chosen samples in a batch
+- `count/rejected`: the count of rejected samples in a batch
+
+## KTOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] KTOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## KTOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] KTOConfig

docs/source/learning_tools.mdx

@@ -1,234 +0,0 @@
-# Learning Tools (Experimental 🧪)
-
-Using Large Language Models (LLMs) with tools has been a popular topic recently with awesome works such as [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) and [ToolBench](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.16504.pdf). In TRL, we provide a simple example of how to teach LLM to use tools with reinforcement learning. 
-
-
-Here's an overview of the scripts in the [trl repository](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/tree/main/examples/research_projects/tools):
-
-| File | Description | 
-|---|---| 
-| [`calculator.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/calculator.py) | Script to train LLM to use a calculator with reinforcement learning. |
-| [`triviaqa.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/triviaqa.py) | Script to train LLM to use a wiki tool to answer questions. |
-| [`python_interpreter.py`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/tools/python_interpreter.py) | Script to train LLM to use python interpreter to solve math puzzles. |
-
-<Tip warning={true}>
-
-Note that the scripts above rely heavily on the `TextEnvironment` API which is still under active development. The API may change in the future. Please see [`TextEnvironment`](text_environment) for the related docs.
-</Tip>
-
-
-## Learning to Use a Calculator
-
-
-The rough idea is as follows:
-
-1. Load a tool such as [ybelkada/simple-calculator](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ybelkada/simple-calculator) that parse a text calculation like `"14 + 34"` and return the calulated number:
-    ```python
-    from transformers import AutoTokenizer, load_tool
-    tool = load_tool("ybelkada/simple-calculator")
-    tool_fn = lambda text: str(round(float(tool(text)), 2))  # rounding to 2 decimal places
-    ```
-1. Define a reward function that returns a positive reward if the tool returns the correct answer. In the script we create a dummy reward function like `reward_fn = lambda x: 1`, but we override the rewards directly later.
-1. Create a prompt on how to use the tools
-    ```python
-    # system prompt
-    prompt = """\
-    What is 13.1-3?
-
-    <request><SimpleCalculatorTool>13.1-3<call>10.1<response>
-
-    Result=10.1<submit>
-
-    What is 4*3?
-
-    <request><SimpleCalculatorTool>4*3<call>12<response>
-
-    Result=12<submit>
-
-    What is 12.1+1?
-
-    <request><SimpleCalculatorTool>12.1+1<call>13.1<response>
-
-    Result=13.1<submit>
-
-    What is 12.1-20?
-
-    <request><SimpleCalculatorTool>12.1-20<call>-7.9<response>
-
-    Result=-7.9<submit>"""
-    ```
-3. Create a `trl.TextEnvironment` with the model 
-    ```python
-    env = TextEnvironment(
-        model,
-        tokenizer,
-        {"SimpleCalculatorTool": tool_fn},
-        reward_fn,
-        prompt,
-        generation_kwargs=generation_kwargs,
-    )
-    ```
-4. Then generate some data such as `tasks = ["\n\nWhat is 13.1-3?", "\n\nWhat is 4*3?"]` and run the environment with `queries, responses, masks, rewards, histories = env.run(tasks)`. The environment will look for the `<call>` token in the prompt and append the tool output to the response; it will also return the mask associated with the response. You can further use the `histories` to visualize the interaction between the model and the tool; `histories[0].show_text()` will show the text with color-coded tool output and `histories[0].show_tokens(tokenizer)` will show visualize the tokens.
-    ![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/learning_tools.png)
-1. Finally, we can train the model with `train_stats = ppo_trainer.step(queries, responses, rewards, masks)`. The trainer will use the mask to ignore the tool output when computing the loss, make sure to pass that argument to `step`.
-
-## Experiment results
-
-We trained a model with the above script for 10 random seeds. You can reproduce the run with the following command. Feel free to remove the `--slurm-*` arguments if you don't have access to a slurm cluster.
-
-```
-WANDB_TAGS="calculator_final" python benchmark/benchmark.py \
-    --command "python examples/research_projects/tools/calculator.py" \
-    --num-seeds 10 \
-    --start-seed 1 \
-    --workers 10 \
-    --slurm-gpus-per-task 1 \
-    --slurm-ntasks 1 \
-    --slurm-total-cpus 8 \
-    --slurm-template-path benchmark/trl.slurm_template
-```
-
-We can then use [`openrlbenchmark`](https://github.com/openrlbenchmark/openrlbenchmark) which generates the following plot.
-```
-python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
-    --filters '?we=openrlbenchmark&wpn=trl&xaxis=_step&ceik=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.tracker_project_name&cen=trl_ppo_trainer_config.value.log_with&metrics=env/reward_mean&metrics=objective/kl' \
-        'wandb?tag=calculator_final&cl=calculator_mask' \
-    --env-ids trl \
-    --check-empty-runs \
-    --pc.ncols 2 \
-    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
-    --output-filename static/0compare \
-    --scan-history
-```
-
-![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/learning_tools_chart.png)
-
-As we can see, while 1-2 experiments crashed for some reason, most of the runs obtained near perfect proficiency in the calculator task.
-
-
-## (Early Experiments 🧪): learning to use a wiki tool for question answering
-
-In the [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) paper, it shows an interesting use case that utilizes a Wikipedia Search tool to help answer questions. In this section, we attempt to perform similar experiments but uses RL instead to teach the model to use a wiki tool on the [TriviaQA](https://nlp.cs.washington.edu/triviaqa/) dataset.
-
-
-<Tip warning={true}>
-
-**Note that many settings are different so the results are not directly comparable.**
-</Tip>
-
-
-
-
-### Building a search index
-
-Since [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) did not open source, we needed to first replicate the search index. It is mentioned in their paper that the authors built the search index using a BM25 retriever that indexes the Wikipedia dump from [KILT](https://github.com/facebookresearch/KILT)
-
-Fortunately, [`pyserini`](https://github.com/castorini/pyserini) already implements the BM25 retriever and provides a prebuilt index for the KILT Wikipedia dump. We can use the following code to search the index.
-
-```python
-from pyserini.search.lucene import LuceneSearcher
-import json
-searcher = LuceneSearcher.from_prebuilt_index('wikipedia-kilt-doc')
-def search(query):
-    hits = searcher.search(query, k=1)
-    hit = hits[0]
-    contents = json.loads(hit.raw)['contents']
-    return contents
-print(search("tennis racket"))
-```
-```
-Racket (sports equipment)
-A racket or racquet is a sports implement consisting of a handled frame with an open hoop across which a network of strings or catgut is stretched tightly. It is used for striking a ball or shuttlecock in games such as squash, tennis, racquetball, and badminton. Collectively, these games are known as racket sports. Racket design and manufacturing has changed considerably over the centuries.
-
-The frame of rackets for all sports was traditionally made of solid wood (later laminated wood) and the strings of animal intestine known as catgut. The traditional racket size was limited by the strength and weight of the wooden frame which had to be strong enough to hold the strings and stiff enough to hit the ball or shuttle. Manufacturers started adding non-wood laminates to wood rackets to improve stiffness. Non-wood rackets were made first of steel, then of aluminum, and then carbon fiber composites. Wood is still used for real tennis, rackets, and xare. Most rackets are now made of composite materials including carbon fiber or fiberglass, metals such as titanium alloys, or ceramics.
-...
-```
-
-We then basically deployed this snippet as a Hugging Face space [here](https://huggingface.co/spaces/vwxyzjn/pyserini-wikipedia-kilt-doc), so that we can use the space as a `transformers.Tool` later.
-
-![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/pyserini.png)
-
-### Experiment settings
-
-We use the following settings:
-
-* use the `bigcode/starcoderbase` model as the base model
-* use the `pyserini-wikipedia-kilt-doc` space as the wiki tool and only uses the first paragrahs of the search result, allowing the `TextEnvironment` to obtain at most `max_tool_reponse=400` response tokens from the tool.
-* test if the response contain the answer string, if so, give a reward of 1, otherwise, give a reward of 0.
-    * notice this is a simplified evaluation criteria. In [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761), the authors checks if the first 20 words of the response contain the correct answer.
-* used the following prompt that demonstrates the usage of the wiki tool.
-```python
-prompt = """\
-Answer the following question:
-
-Q: In which branch of the arts is Patricia Neary famous?
-A: Ballets
-A2: <request><Wiki>Patricia Neary<call>Patricia Neary (born October 27, 1942) is an American ballerina, choreographer and ballet director, who has been particularly active in Switzerland. She has also been a highly successful ambassador for the Balanchine Trust, bringing George Balanchine's ballets to 60 cities around the globe.<response>
-Result=Ballets<submit>
-
-Q: Who won Super Bowl XX?
-A: Chicago Bears
-A2: <request><Wiki>Super Bowl XX<call>Super Bowl XX was an American football game between the National Football Conference (NFC) champion Chicago Bears and the American Football Conference (AFC) champion New England Patriots to decide the National Football League (NFL) champion for the 1985 season. The Bears defeated the Patriots by the score of 46–10, capturing their first NFL championship (and Chicago's first overall sports victory) since 1963, three years prior to the birth of the Super Bowl. Super Bowl XX was played on January 26, 1986 at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans.<response>
-Result=Chicago Bears<submit>
-
-Q: """
-```
-
-
-### Result and Discussion
-
-
-Our experiments show that the agent can learn to use the wiki tool to answer questions. The learning curves would go up mostly, but one of the experiment did crash.
-
-![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/triviaqa_learning_curves.png)
-
-Wandb report is [here](https://wandb.ai/costa-huang/cleanRL/reports/TriviaQA-Final-Experiments--Vmlldzo1MjY0ODk5) for further inspection.
-
-
-Note that the correct rate of the trained model is on the low end, which could be due to the following reasons:
-
-* **incorrect searches:** When given the question `"What is Bruce Willis' real first name?"` if the model searches for `Bruce Willis`, our wiki tool returns "Patrick Poivey (born 18 February 1948) is a French actor. He is especially known for his voice: he is the French dub voice of Bruce Willis since 1988.` But a correct search should be `Walter Bruce Willis (born March 19, 1955) is an American former actor. He achieved fame with a leading role on the comedy-drama series Moonlighting (1985–1989) and appeared in over a hundred films, gaining recognition as an action hero after his portrayal of John McClane in the Die Hard franchise (1988–2013) and other roles.[1][2]"
-
-
-    ![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/real_first_name.png)
-
-* **unnecessarily long response**: The wiki tool by default sometimes output very long sequences. E.g., when the wiki tool searches for "Brown Act"
-    * Our wiki tool returns "The Ralph M. Brown Act, located at California Government Code 54950 "et seq.", is an act of the California State Legislature, authored by Assemblymember Ralph M. Brown and passed in 1953, that guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies."
-    * [ToolFormer](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761)'s wiki tool returns "The Ralph M. Brown Act is an act of the California State Legislature that guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies." which is more succinct.
-
-    ![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/brown_act.png)
-
-
-## (Early Experiments 🧪): solving math puzzles with python interpreter
-
-In this section, we attempt to teach the model to use a python interpreter to solve math puzzles. The rough idea is to give the agent a prompt like the following:
-
-```python
-prompt = """\
-Example of using a Python API to solve math questions.
-
-Q: Olivia has $23. She bought five bagels for $3 each. How much money does she have left?
-
-<request><PythonInterpreter>
-def solution():
-    money_initial = 23
-    bagels = 5
-    bagel_cost = 3
-    money_spent = bagels * bagel_cost
-    money_left = money_initial - money_spent
-    result = money_left
-    return result
-print(solution())
-<call>72<response>
-
-Result = 72 <submit>
-
-Q: """
-```
-
-
-Training experiment can be found at https://wandb.ai/lvwerra/trl-gsm8k/runs/a5odv01y
-
-![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/gms8k_learning_curve.png)
-
-

docs/source/liger_kernel_integration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Liger Kernel Integration
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
+
+[Liger Kernel](https://github.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel) is a collection of Triton kernels designed specifically for LLM training. It can effectively increase multi-GPU training throughput by 20% and reduce memory usage by 60%. That way, we can **4x** our context length, as described in the benchmark below. They have implemented Hugging Face compatible `RMSNorm`, `RoPE`, `SwiGLU`, `CrossEntropy`, `FusedLinearCrossEntropy`, with more to come. The kernel works out of the box with [FlashAttention](https://github.com/Dao-AILab/flash-attention), [PyTorch FSDP](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/FSDP_tutorial.html), and [Microsoft DeepSpeed](https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed).
+
+With this memory reduction, you can potentially turn off `cpu_offloading` or gradient checkpointing to further boost the performance.
+
+| Speed Up | Memory Reduction |
+| --- | --- |
+| ![Speed up](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel/main/docs/images/e2e-tps.png) | ![Memory](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel/main/docs/images/e2e-memory.png) |
+
+1. To use Liger-Kernel in [`SFTTrainer`], first install it by:
+  
+  ```bash
+  pip install liger-kernel
+  ```
+
+2. Once installed, set `use_liger_kernel` in [`SFTConfig`]. No other changes are needed!
+
+```python
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    use_liger_kernel=True,
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+To learn more about Liger-Kernel, visit their [official repository](https://github.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel/).

docs/source/logging.mdx

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-# Logging
-
-As reinforcement learning algorithms are historically challenging to debug, it's important to pay careful attention to logging.
-By default, the TRL [`PPOTrainer`] saves a lot of relevant information to `wandb` or `tensorboard`.
-
-Upon initialization, pass one of these two options to the [`PPOConfig`]:
-```
-config = PPOConfig(
-    model_name=args.model_name,
-    log_with=`wandb`, # or `tensorboard`
-)
-```
-If you want to log with tensorboard, add the kwarg `project_kwargs={"logging_dir": PATH_TO_LOGS}` to the PPOConfig.
-
-## PPO Logging
-
-Here's a brief explanation for the logged metrics provided in the data:
-
-Key metrics to monitor. We want to maximize the reward, maintain a low KL divergence, and maximize entropy:
-1. `env/reward_mean`: The average reward obtained from the environment. Alias `ppo/mean_scores`, which is sed to specifically monitor the reward model.
-1. `env/reward_std`: The standard deviation of the reward obtained from the environment. Alias ``ppo/std_scores`, which is sed to specifically monitor the reward model.
-1. `env/reward_dist`: The histogram distribution of the reward obtained from the environment.
-1. `objective/kl`: The mean Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the old and new policies. It measures how much the new policy deviates from the old policy. The KL divergence is used to compute the KL penalty in the objective function.
-1. `objective/kl_dist`: The histogram distribution of the `objective/kl`.
-1. `objective/kl_coef`: The coefficient for Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence in the objective function. 
-1. `ppo/mean_non_score_reward`: The **KL penalty** calculated by `objective/kl * objective/kl_coef` as the total reward for optimization to prevent the new policy from deviating too far from the old policy.
-1. `objective/entropy`: The entropy of the model's policy, calculated by `-logprobs.sum(-1).mean()`. High entropy means the model's actions are more random, which can be beneficial for exploration.
-
-Training stats:
-1. `ppo/learning_rate`: The learning rate for the PPO algorithm.
-1. `ppo/policy/entropy`: The entropy of the model's policy, calculated by `pd = torch.nn.functional.softmax(logits, dim=-1); entropy = torch.logsumexp(logits, dim=-1) - torch.sum(pd * logits, dim=-1)`. It measures the randomness of the policy.
-1. `ppo/policy/clipfrac`: The fraction of probability ratios (old policy / new policy) that fell outside the clipping range in the PPO objective. This can be used to monitor the optimization process.
-1. `ppo/policy/approxkl`: The approximate KL divergence between the old and new policies, measured by `0.5 * masked_mean((logprobs - old_logprobs) ** 2, mask)`, corresponding to the `k2` estimator in http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html
-1. `ppo/policy/policykl`: Similar to `ppo/policy/approxkl`, but measured by `masked_mean(old_logprobs - logprobs, mask)`, corresponding to the `k1` estimator in http://joschu.net/blog/kl-approx.html
-1. `ppo/policy/ratio`:  The histogram distribution of the ratio between the new and old policies, used to compute the PPO objective.
-1. `ppo/policy/advantages_mean`: The average of the GAE (Generalized Advantage Estimation) advantage estimates. The advantage function measures how much better an action is compared to the average action at a state.
-1. `ppo/policy/advantages`: The histogram distribution of `ppo/policy/advantages_mean`.
-1. `ppo/returns/mean`: The mean of the TD(λ) returns, calculated by `returns = advantage + values`, another indicator of model performance. See https://iclr-blog-track.github.io/2022/03/25/ppo-implementation-details/ for more details.
-1. `ppo/returns/var`: The variance of the TD(λ) returns, calculated by `returns = advantage + values`, another indicator of model performance.
-1. `ppo/val/mean`: The mean of the values, used to monitor the value function's performance.
-1. `ppo/val/var` : The variance of the values, used to monitor the value function's performance.
-1. `ppo/val/var_explained`: The explained variance for the value function, used to monitor the value function's performance.
-1. `ppo/val/clipfrac`: The fraction of the value function's predicted values that are clipped.
-1. `ppo/val/vpred`: The predicted values from the value function.
-1. `ppo/val/error`: The mean squared error between the `ppo/val/vpred` and returns, used to monitor the value function's performance.
-1. `ppo/loss/policy`: The policy loss for the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm.
-1. `ppo/loss/value`: The loss for the value function in the PPO algorithm. This value quantifies how well the function estimates the expected future rewards.
-1. `ppo/loss/total`: The total loss for the PPO algorithm. It is the sum of the policy loss and the value function loss.
-
-
-Stats on queries, responses, and logprobs:
-1. `tokens/queries_len_mean`: The average length of the queries tokens.
-1. `tokens/queries_len_std`: The standard deviation of the length of the queries tokens.
-1. `tokens/queries_dist`: The histogram distribution of the length of the queries tokens.
-1. `tokens/responses_len_mean`: The average length of the responses tokens.
-1. `tokens/responses_len_std`: The standard deviation of the length of the responses tokens.
-1. `tokens/responses_dist`: The histogram distribution of the length of the responses tokens. (Costa: inconsistent naming, should be `tokens/responses_len_dist`)
-1. `objective/logprobs`: The histogram distribution of the log probabilities of the actions taken by the model.
-1. `objective/ref_logprobs`: The histogram distribution of the log probabilities of the actions taken by the reference model.
-
-
-
-### Crucial values
-During training, many values are logged, here are the most important ones:
-
-1. `env/reward_mean`,`env/reward_std`, `env/reward_dist`: the properties of the reward distribution from the "environment" /  reward model
-1. `ppo/mean_non_score_reward`: The mean negated KL penalty during training (shows the delta between the reference model and the new policy over the batch in the step)
-
-Here are some parameters that are useful to monitor for stability (when these diverge or collapse to 0, try tuning variables):
-
-1. `ppo/loss/value`: it will spike / NaN when not going well.
-1. `ppo/policy/ratio`: `ratio` being 1 is a baseline value, meaning that the probability of sampling a token is the same under the new and old policy. If the ratio is too high like 200, it means the probability of sampling a token is 200 times higher under the new policy than the old policy. This is a sign that the new policy is too different from the old policy, which will likely cause overoptimization and collapse training later on.
-1. `ppo/policy/clipfrac` and `ppo/policy/approxkl`: if `ratio` is too high, the `ratio` is going to get clipped, resulting in high `clipfrac` and high `approxkl` as well.
-1. `objective/kl`: it should stay positive so that the policy is not too far away from the reference policy.
-1. `objective/kl_coef`: The target coefficient with [`AdaptiveKLController`]. Often increases before numerical instabilities.

docs/source/lora_without_regret.md

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+# LoRA Without Regret
+
+Recent research from the team at [Thinking Machines Lab](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/lora/) (Schulman et al., 2025) shows that **LoRA can match full fine-tuning performance** when configured correctly, while using only ~67% of the compute. These findings are exciting to TRL users because they're straightforward to implement and can improve model performance on smaller budgets.
+
+This guide provides simple instructions to reproduce the results of the blog post in TRL.
+
+> [!TIP]
+> It is recommended to read the blog post before following this guide, or to consult both resources in parallel for best results.
+
+## Benefits of LoRA over full fine-tuning
+
+First of all, let's remind ourselves of the benefits of [LoRA over full fine-tuning](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/en/peft_integration).
+
+LoRA adds adapter layers on top of the base model, which contains significantly fewer parameters than the base model itself. This design reduces GPU memory requirements and enables more efficient training. As described in the [blog](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/lora/), this approach was originally thought to involve a performance trade-off, although careful configuration can overcome this trade-off and match full fine-tuning performance.  
+
+## Examples with TRL
+
+Let's implement and train LoRA adapters in TRL scripts based on the core findings of the blog post. Afterwards, we'll revisit each finding in light of the TRL results.
+
+### Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
+
+The blog post performs SFT on a range of models and datasets from the Hub, which we can reproduce in TRL.
+
+| Model | Dataset |
+| --- | --- |
+| [Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B) | [allenai/tulu-3-sft-mixture](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/tulu-3-sft-mixture) |
+| [Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B) | [open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k) |
+| [Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B) | [allenai/tulu-3-sft-mixture](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/tulu-3-sft-mixture) |
+| [Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B) | [open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k) |
+
+<hfoptions id="sft">
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+We can integrate these findings with the TRL Python API like so:
+
+```python
+
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from peft import LoraConfig
+from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
+
+dataset = load_dataset("open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k", split="train")
+
+peft_config = LoraConfig(r=256, lora_alpha=16, target_modules="all-linear")
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    learning_rate=2e-4,
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1,
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
+    num_train_epochs=1,
+    report_to=["trackio"],
+)
+
+trainer = SFTTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct",
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    peft_config=peft_config,
+    args=training_args,
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="jobs">
+
+```bash
+
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --timeout 8h \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/main/trl/scripts/sft.py" \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k \
+    --learning_rate 2.0e-5 \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --packing \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 2 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 16 \
+    --use_peft \
+    --lora_r 256 \
+    --lora_alpha 16 \
+    --lora_target_modules all-linear \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-3B-OpenThoughts-LoRA \
+    --report_to trackio \
+    --push_to_hub
+
+```
+
+To use Hugging Face Jobs, you will need to be logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`) and have a [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan. Check out the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/en/guides/jobs) for more details.
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="local">
+
+```bash
+
+uv run "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/trl/main/trl/scripts/sft.py" \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name open-thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k \
+    --learning_rate 2.0e-5 \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --packing \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 2 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 16 \
+    --gradient_checkpointing \
+    --eval_strategy no \
+    --use_peft \
+    --lora_r 256 \
+    --lora_alpha 16 \
+    --lora_target_modules all-linear \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-3B-OpenThoughts-LoRA \
+    --report_to trackio \
+    --push_to_hub
+
+```
+
+To run the script locally, you will need to have `uv` installed. Check out the [uv documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) for more details.
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+Once training starts, you can monitor the progress in [Trackio](https://huggingface.co/trackio), which will log the URL.
+
+### Reinforcement Learning (GRPO)
+
+The blog post performs GRPO on a range of models and datasets from the Hub, and once again we can reproduce the results in TRL.
+
+| Model | Dataset |
+| --- | --- |
+| [Llama-3.1-8B-Base](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B) | [GSM8k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/gsm8k) |
+| [Llama-3.1-8B-Base](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B) | [DeepMath-103K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zwhe99/DeepMath-103K) |
+| [Qwen3-8b-base](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-8b-base) | [DeepMath-103K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zwhe99/DeepMath-103K) |
+
+For reinforcement learning, the blog uses a math reasoning task that we can reproduce as a Python function.
+
+<details>
+<summary>Reward function</summary>
+
+```python
+def strip_reasoning_accuracy_reward(
+    completions: list[list[dict[str, str]]], solution: list[str], **kwargs
+) -> list[Optional[float]]:
+    """Reward function that strips reasoning tags and checks mathematical accuracy.
+
+    This function:
+    1. Extracts the content from completions
+    2. Removes <think></think> tags (for reasoning that shouldn't be evaluated)
+    3. Parses both the gold solution and the predicted answer
+    4. Uses math_verify to check if they are mathematically equivalent
+
+    Args:
+        completions: List of model completions, each containing a list of messages
+        solution: List of ground truth solutions
+        **kwargs: Additional arguments (ignored but required for trainer compatibility)
+
+    Returns:
+        List of rewards where:
+        - 1.0 if the answer is correct
+        - 0.0 if the answer is incorrect
+        - None if the solution is not parseable (skips this example)
+    """
+    contents = [completion[0]["content"] for completion in completions]
+    rewards = []
+
+    for content, sol in zip(contents, solution):
+        # Strip reasoning tags from completion
+        while "<think>" in content and "</think>" in content:
+            start = content.find("<think>")
+            end = content.find("</think>", start)
+            if start != -1 and end != -1:
+                content = content[:start] + content[end + len("</think>") :]
+            else:
+                break
+
+        # Parse gold solution
+        gold_parsed = parse(
+            f"${sol}$",
+            extraction_config=[
+                LatexExtractionConfig(
+                    boxed_match_priority=0, try_extract_without_anchor=True
+                )
+            ],
+        )
+
+        if len(gold_parsed) != 0:
+            # We require the answer to be provided in correct latex (no malformed operators)
+            answer_parsed = parse(
+                content,
+                extraction_config=[
+                    LatexExtractionConfig(
+                        boxed_match_priority=0,
+                        normalization_config=NormalizationConfig(
+                            basic_latex=True,
+                            units=True,
+                            malformed_operators=False,
+                            nits=False,
+                            boxed=True,
+                        ),
+                        try_extract_without_anchor=False,
+                    )
+                ],
+                extraction_mode="first_match",
+            )
+
+            # Compute binary rewards if verifiable, `None` otherwise to skip this example
+            try:
+                reward = float(verify(gold_parsed, answer_parsed))
+            except Exception as e:
+                print(
+                    f"verify failed: {e}, answer: {answer_parsed}, gold: {gold_parsed}"
+                )
+                reward = None
+        else:
+            # If the gold solution is not parseable, we assign `None` to skip this example
+            reward = None
+
+        rewards.append(reward)
+
+    return rewards
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<hfoptions id="grpo">
+<hfoption id="python">
+
+We can implement these recommendations with the TRL Python API like so:
+
+```python
+
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from peft import LoraConfig
+from trl import GRPOConfig, GRPOTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified", split="train")
+
+def strip_reasoning_accuracy_reward(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that strips reasoning and accuracy scores from the model outputs."""
+
+    ... 
+
+peft_config = LoraConfig(
+    r=1,
+    lora_alpha=32,
+    target_modules="all-linear"
+)
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    learning_rate=5e-5,
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1,
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
+    num_train_epochs=1,
+    num_generations=8,
+    generation_batch_size=8,
+    report_to=["trackio"],
+)
+
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B",
+    reward_funcs=strip_reasoning_accuracy_reward,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    peft_config=peft_config,
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> This snippet skips the reward function which is defined above to keep the example concise.
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="jobs">
+
+```bash
+
+hf jobs uv run \
+    --flavor a100-large \
+    --timeout 4h \
+    --secrets HF_TOKEN \
+    --env PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True \
+    "https://huggingface.co/datasets/burtenshaw/lora-without-regrets/resolve/main/grpo.py" \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B \
+    --dataset_name HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified \
+    --output_dir grpo-full-qwen3-0.6b \
+    --learning_rate 1.0e-6 \
+    --lr_scheduler_type cosine \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.0 \
+    --max_grad_norm 1.0 \
+    --beta 0.0 \
+    --max_prompt_length 1024 \
+    --max_completion_length 4096 \
+    --num_generations 16 \
+    --generation_batch_size 16 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 8 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 1 \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --lora_r 1 \
+    --lora_alpha 32 \
+    --lora_dropout 0.0 \
+    --lora_target_modules all-linear \
+    --vllm_mode colocate \
+    --save_strategy steps \
+    --save_steps 50 \
+    --save_total_limit 1 \
+    --logging_steps 1 \
+    --max_steps 200 \
+    --report_to trackio
+```
+
+To use Hugging Face Jobs, you will need to be logged in to the Hugging Face Hub (`hf auth login`) and have a [Pro](https://hf.co/pro), [Team](https://hf.co/enterprise), or [Enterprise](https://hf.co/enterprise) plan. Check out the [Jobs documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/en/guides/jobs) for more details.
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="local">
+
+```bash
+uv run "https://huggingface.co/datasets/burtenshaw/lora-without-regrets/resolve/main/grpo.py" \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B \
+    --dataset_name HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified \
+    --output_dir grpo-full-qwen3-0.6b \
+    --learning_rate 1.0e-6 \
+    --lr_scheduler_type cosine \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.0 \
+    --max_grad_norm 1.0 \
+    --beta 0.0 \
+    --max_prompt_length 1024 \
+    --max_completion_length 4096 \
+    --num_generations 16 \
+    --generation_batch_size 16 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 8 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 1 \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --lora_r 1 \
+    --lora_alpha 32 \
+    --lora_dropout 0.0 \
+    --lora_target_modules all-linear \
+    --vllm_mode colocate \
+    --save_strategy steps \
+    --save_steps 50 \
+    --save_total_limit 1 \
+    --logging_steps 1 \
+    --max_steps 200 \
+    --report_to trackio
+```
+
+To run the script locally, you will need to have `uv` installed. Check out the [uv documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) for more details.
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+The reinforcement learning script with GRPO is implemented as a custom script in TRL, which uses the reward function shown above. You can review it at [`grpo.py`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/burtenshaw/lora-without-regrets/blob/main/grpo.py) - Reinforcement learning with LoRA best practices
+
+## Key findings in optimizing LoRA
+
+The authors recommend applying LoRA to all weight matrices rather than limiting it to attention layers, as increasing the rank does not compensate for this restriction. In TRL, this can be configured using `--lora_target_modules all-linear` to apply LoRA to all weight matrices.
+
+We were able to reproduce the results of the blog post using TRL and the SmolLM3 model. We trained the model for 500 steps on the [Math 220k dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified) with the reward function and configuration above. As you can see in the figure below, the LoRA model's average train reward curve matches the full fine-tuning curve.
+
+![train reward](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/5.png)
+
+And most importantly, the LoRA model uses significantly less memory than the full fine-tuning model, as we can see in the figure below.
+
+![memory usage](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/6.png)
+
+Here are the parameters we used to train the above models
+
+| Parameter | LoRA | Full FT |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `--model_name_or_path` | HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B | HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B |
+| `--dataset_name` | HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified | HuggingFaceH4/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified |
+| `--learning_rate` | 1.0e-5 | 1.0e-6 |
+| `--max_prompt_length` | 1024 | 1024 |
+| `--max_completion_length` | 4096 | 4096 |
+| `--lora_r` | 1 | - |
+| `--lora_alpha` | 32 | - |
+| `--lora_dropout` | 0.0 | - |
+| `--lora_target_modules` | all-linear | - |
+
+Let's break down the key findings of the blog post and how we were able to reproduce them.
+
+### 1. *LoRA performs better when applied to all weight matrices*
+
+The authors recommend applying LoRA to all weight matrices rather than limiting it to attention layers, as increasing the rank does not compensate for this restriction.
+
+![all layers](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/1.png)
+
+Attention-only LoRA underperforms even when using a higher rank to match parameter count. In TRL, this can be configured using `--lora_target_modules all-linear` to apply LoRA to all weight matrices.  In Python, we can do this like so:
+
+```python
+from peft import LoraConfig  
+
+peft_config = LoraConfig(target_modules="all-linear")  
+```
+
+### 2. *The adapter needs sufficient capacity to learn from the dataset*
+
+The blog post recommends using a sufficient LoRA rank to learn from the dataset. The rank determines the number of trainable parameters in the LoRA adapter. Therefore, "For datasets that exceed LoRA capacity, LoRA underperforms FullFT".
+
+![learning rate](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/3.png)
+
+In the TRL script, we could use `--lora_r` to set the rank and adapt it based on the task and dataset we're training on. The blog post recommends the following ranks based on the task and dataset size:
+
+Reinforcement learning tasks typically require lower capacity, so smaller LoRA ranks can be used. This is because policy gradient algorithms extract roughly ~1 bit of information per episode, demanding minimal parameter capacity.  
+
+The blog post defines the ideal dataset size for LoRA to match full fine-tuning as "Post-training scale". Which we can use to determine the recommended rank for SFT and RL LoRAs as:
+
+| Task Type | Dataset Size | Recommended Rank |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| **SFT** | Post-training scale | 256 |
+| **RL** | Any size | 1-32 |
+
+### 3. *"FullFT and high-rank LoRAs have similar learning curves"*
+
+Counterintuitively, the blog post recommends using a higher learning rate than for full fine-tuning. In the table above, we used 1.0e-5 for LoRA and 1.0e-6 for full fine-tuning. In the TRL script, we could use `--learning_rate` to set the learning rate. The  \\( \frac{1}{r} \\) scaling in LoRA makes the optimal learning rate approximately rank-independent.
+
+![learning rate](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/2.png)
+
+### 4. *"In some scenarios, LoRA is less tolerant of large batch sizes than full fine-tuning."*
+
+The blog post recommends using an effective batch size < 32 because the authors found LoRA to be less tolerant of large batch sizes. This could not be mitigated by increasing the LoRA rank. In the TRL script, we could use `--per_device_train_batch_size` and `--gradient_accumulation_steps` to set the batch size.
+
+![learning rate](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/lora_without_regret/4.png)
+
+## Takeaways
+
+Using TRL, you can efficiently implement LoRA adapters to match full fine-tuning performance, applying the core insights (targeting all weight matrices, choosing the right rank, and managing batch size and learning rate) without the heavy compute cost of FullFT.
+
+## Citation
+
+```bibtex
+@article{schulman2025lora,  
+    title        = {{LoRA Without Regret}},  
+    author       = {John Schulman and Thinking Machines Lab},  
+    year         = 2025,  
+    journal      = {Thinking Machines Lab: Connectionism},  
+    doi          = {10.64434/tml.20250929},  
+    note         = {https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/lora/}  
+}  
+```

docs/source/model_utils.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Model Utilities
+
+## clone_chat_template
+
+[[autodoc]] clone_chat_template
+
+## get_act_offloading_ctx_manager
+
+[[autodoc]] models.get_act_offloading_ctx_manager

docs/source/models.md

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ With the `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` class TRL supports all decoder mode
 
 ## AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
 
-
 [[autodoc]] AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
     - __init__
     - forward
@@ -25,4 +24,4 @@ With the `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` class TRL supports all decoder mode
 
 ## create_reference_model
 
-[[autodoc]] create_reference_model
+[[autodoc]] create_reference_model

docs/source/multi_adapter_rl.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Multi Adapter RL (MARL) - a single base model for everything
 
-Here we present an approach that uses a single base model for the entire PPO algorithm - which includes retrieving the reference logits, computing the active logits and the rewards. This feature is experimental as we did not tested the convergence of the approach. We encourage the community to let us know if they potentially face into any issue.
+Here we present an approach that uses a single base model for the entire PPO algorithm - which includes retrieving the reference logits, computing the active logits and the rewards. This feature is experimental as we did not test the convergence of the approach. We encourage the community to let us know if they potentially face issues.
 
 ## Requirements
 
@@ -10,15 +10,15 @@ You just need to install `peft` and optionally install `bitsandbytes` as well if
 
 You need to address this approach in three stages that we summarize as follows:
 
-1- Train a base model on the target domain (e.g. `imdb` dataset) - this is the Supervised Fine Tuning stage - it can leverage the `SFTTrainer` from TRL.
+1- Train a base model on the target domain (e.g. [IMDB dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/imdb)) - this is the Supervised Fine Tuning stage - it can leverage the `SFTTrainer` from TRL.
 2- Train a reward model using `peft`. This is required in order to re-use the adapter during the RL optimisation process (step 3 below). We show an example of leveraging the `RewardTrainer` from TRL in [this example](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py)
 3- Fine tune new adapters on the base model using PPO and the reward adapter. ("0 abstraction RL")
 
-Make sure to use the same model (i.e. same architecture and same weights) for the stages 2 & 3. 
+Make sure to use the same model (i.e. same architecture and same weights) for the stages 2 & 3.
 
 ## Quickstart
 
-Let us assume you have trained your reward adapter on `llama-7b` model using `RewardTrainer` and pushed the weights on the hub under `trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter`. 
+Let us assume you have trained your reward adapter on `llama-7b` model using `RewardTrainer` and pushed the weights on the hub under `trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter`.
 When doing PPO, before passing the model to `PPOTrainer` create your model as follows:
 
 ```python
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ trainer = PPOTrainer(
 
 ...
 ```
-Then inside your PPO training loop, call the `compute_reward_score` method by accessing to the `model` attribute from `PPOTrainer`.
+
+Then inside your PPO training loop, call the `compute_reward_score` method by accessing the `model` attribute from `PPOTrainer`.
 
 ```python
 rewards = trainer.model.compute_reward_score(**inputs)
@@ -56,10 +57,10 @@ rewards = trainer.model.compute_reward_score(**inputs)
 
 ## Advanced usage
 
-### Control on the adapter name 
+### Control on the adapter name
 
-If you are familiar with the `peft` library, you know that you can use multiple adapters inside the same model. What you can do is to train multiple adapters on the same base model to fine-tune on different policies. 
-In this case, you want to have a control on the adapter name you want to activate back, after retrieving the reward. For that, simply pass the appropriate `adapter_name` to `ppo_adapter_name` argument when calling `compute_reward_score`.
+If you are familiar with the `peft` library, you know that you can use multiple adapters inside the same model. What you can do is train multiple adapters on the same base model to fine-tune on different policies.
+In this case, you want to be able to control the adapter name you want to activate back, after retrieving the reward. For that, simply pass the appropriate `adapter_name` to `ppo_adapter_name` argument when calling `compute_reward_score`.
 
 ```python
 adapter_name_policy_1 = "policy_1"
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ rewards = trainer.model.compute_reward_score(**inputs, ppo_adapter_name=adapter_
 
 For more memory efficient fine-tuning, you can load your base model in 8-bit or 4-bit while keeping the adapters in the default precision (float32).
 Just pass the appropriate arguments (i.e. `load_in_8bit=True` or `load_in_4bit=True`) to `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained` as follows (assuming you have installed `bitsandbytes`):
+
 ```python
 model_name = "llama-7b"
 rm_adapter_id = "trl-lib/llama-7b-hh-rm-adapter"
@@ -88,7 +90,7 @@ model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     model_name,
     peft_config=lora_config,
     reward_adapter=rm_adapter_id,
-    load_in_8bit=True,
+    quantization_config=BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True),
 )
 
 ...
@@ -97,4 +99,4 @@ trainer = PPOTrainer(
     ...
 )
 ...
-```
+```

docs/source/nash_md_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+# Nash-MD Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-Nash--MD-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=nash-md,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+Nash-MD was proposed in the paper [Nash Learning from Human Feedback](https://huggingface.co/papers/2312.00886) by Rémi Munos, [Michal Valko](https://huggingface.co/misovalko), Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Daniel Guo, Yunhao Tang, Matthieu Geist, Thomas Mésnard, and Andrea Michi.
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the main paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, RLHF involves the initial step of learning a reward model from human feedback, often expressed as preferences between pairs of text generations produced by a pre-trained LLM. Subsequently, the LLM's policy is fine-tuned by optimizing it to maximize the reward model through a reinforcement learning algorithm. However, an inherent limitation of current reward models is their inability to fully represent the richness of human preferences and their dependency on the sampling distribution. In this study, we introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of LLMs using pairwise human feedback. Our approach entails the initial learning of a preference model, which is conditioned on two inputs given a prompt, followed by the pursuit of a policy that consistently generates responses preferred over those generated by any competing policy, thus defining the Nash equilibrium of this preference model. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF). In the context of a tabular policy representation, we present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent. This algorithm produces a sequence of policies, with the last iteration converging to the regularized Nash equilibrium. Additionally, we explore parametric representations of policies and introduce gradient descent algorithms for deep-learning architectures. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present experimental results involving the fine-tuning of a LLM for a text summarization task. We believe NLHF offers a compelling avenue for preference learning and policy optimization with the potential of advancing the field of aligning LLMs with human preferences.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif) and [Daniil Tiapkin](https://huggingface.co/dtiapkin), [Pierre Ménard](https://huggingface.co/menardprr), Daniele Calandriello and [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the Nash-MD method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model and [`PairRMJudge`] as a judge. We use the prompts from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the prompts in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_nash_md.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import NashMDConfig, NashMDTrainer, PairRMJudge
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+judge = PairRMJudge()
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt", split="train")
+
+training_args = NashMDConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-NashMD")
+trainer = NashMDTrainer(
+    model=model, judge=judge, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_nash_md.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 3 hours.
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-NashMD) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
+
+<pre><code>$ transformers chat trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-NashMD
+<strong><span style="color: red;">&lt;quentin_gallouedec&gt;:</span></strong>
+What is the best programming language?
+
+<strong><span style="color: blue;">&lt;trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-NashMD&gt;:</span></strong>
+The best programming language depends on personal preference, the complexity of the project, and the specific requirements of the task. Some programming languages that are often recommended include Python, Java, and JavaScript, and there are many other languages to choose from depending on individual needs.
+</code></pre>
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+Nash-MD requires a [prompt-only dataset](dataset_formats#prompt-only). The [`NashMDTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+## Usage tips
+
+### Use a reward model
+
+Instead of a judge, you can chose to use a reward model -- see [Reward Bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/allenai/reward-bench) for a leaderboard of public models you can use. Below is a code example showing how to replace a judge with the [trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward) model:
+
+```diff
+- from trl import PairRMJudge
++ from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
+
+- judge = PairRMJudge()
++ reward_model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward", num_labels=1)
+
+  trainer = NashMDTrainer(
+      ...
+-     judge=judge,
++     reward_funcs=reward_model,
+  )
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Make sure that the SFT model and reward model use the _same_ chat template and the same tokenizer. Otherwise, you may find the model completions are scored incorrectly during training.
+
+### Encourage EOS token generation
+
+We may want the model to generate completions within a given length. During training, the model will generate completions up to the maximum length specified in the `max_new_tokens` argument of [`NashMDConfig`]. If you want to penalize the model for not generating an EOS token before reaching the maximum length, you can use the `missing_eos_penalty` argument of [`NashMDConfig`]:
+
+```python
+training_args = NashMDConfig(..., max_new_tokens=128, missing_eos_penalty=1.0)
+```
+
+### Logging Completions
+
+To better understand your model’s behavior during training, you can log sample completions periodically using the [`LogCompletionsCallback`].
+
+```python
+trainer = NashMDTrainer(..., eval_dataset=eval_dataset)
+completions_callback = LogCompletionsCallback(trainer, num_prompts=8)
+trainer.add_callback(completions_callback)
+```
+
+This callback logs the model's generated completions directly to Weights & Biases.
+
+![Logged Completions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/wandb_completions.png)
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the Nash-MD method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/nash_md.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/nash_md.py)
+
+To test the online DPO script with the [Qwen2.5 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+python examples/scripts/nash_md.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --judge pair_rm \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt \
+    --learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-NashMD-PairRM \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.1 \
+    --push_to_hub
+```
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+* `loss/kl`: The mean KL divergence between the model and reference data.
+* `objective/entropy`: The mean entropy of the model and reference data.
+* `loss/score`: The mean reinforce score loss.
+* `rewards/chosen`: The mean scores (according to the reward model) of the model completions.
+* `rewards/rejected`: The mean scores (according to the reward model) of the mixture completions.
+* `rewards/probabilities`: The mean probability (according to the reward model or judge) of the model completions chosen vs the mixture completion.
+* `rewards/accuracies`: The accuracies of the Nash-MD's implicit reward model.
+* `rewards/margins`: The mean reward margin (according to reward model) between the chosen and mixture completions.
+* `logps/chosen`: The mean log probabilities of the chosen completions.
+* `logps/rejected`: The mean log probabilities of the reference completions.
+* `val/model_contain_eos_token`: The amount of times the model's output contains the eos token.
+* `val/ref_contain_eos_token`: The amount of times the mixture's output contains the eos token.
+* `beta`: The parameter that controls the weight of the loss term representing the deviation from the reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`NashMDConfig`].
+* `mixture_coef`: Logit mixture coefficient for the model and reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`NashMDConfig`].
+
+## NashMDTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] NashMDTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## NashMDConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] NashMDConfig

docs/source/online_dpo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+# Online DPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-Online_DPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=online-dpo,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+Online DPO was proposed in [Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.04792) by Shangmin Guo, Biao Zhang, Tianlin Liu, Tianqi Liu, Misha Khalman, Felipe Llinares, Alexandre Rame, Thomas Mesnard, Yao Zhao, Bilal Piot, Johan Ferret, and Mathieu Blondel.
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Direct alignment from preferences (DAP) methods, such as DPO, have recently emerged as efficient alternatives to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), that do not require a separate reward model. However, the preference datasets used in DAP methods are usually collected ahead of training and never updated, thus the feedback is purely offline. Moreover, responses in these datasets are often sampled from a language model distinct from the one being aligned, and since the model evolves over training, the alignment phase is inevitably off-policy. In this study, we posit that online feedback is key and improves DAP methods. Our method, online AI feedback (OAIF), uses an LLM as annotator: on each training iteration, we sample two responses from the current model and prompt the LLM annotator to choose which one is preferred, thus providing online feedback. Despite its simplicity, we demonstrate via human evaluation in several tasks that OAIF outperforms both offline DAP and RLHF methods. We further show that the feedback leveraged in OAIF is easily controllable, via instruction prompts to the LLM annotator.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Michael Noukhovitch](https://huggingface.co/mnoukhov), [Shengyi Costa Huang](https://huggingface.co/vwxyzjn), [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec), and [Edward Beeching](https://huggingface.co/edbeeching).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the online DPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model and [`PairRMJudge`] as a judge. We use the prompts from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the prompts in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_online_dpo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import OnlineDPOConfig, OnlineDPOTrainer, PairRMJudge
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+judge = PairRMJudge()
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt", split="train")
+
+training_args = OnlineDPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-OnlineDPO")
+trainer = OnlineDPOTrainer(
+    model=model, judge=judge, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_online_dpo.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 1 hour. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in both the reward for rejected and chosen completions indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
+
+![](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/online-dpo-qwen2.png)
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-OnlineDPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
+
+<pre><code>$ transformers chat trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-OnlineDPO
+<strong><span style="color: red;">&lt;quentin_gallouedec&gt;:</span></strong>
+What is the best programming language?
+
+<strong><span style="color: blue;">&lt;trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-OnlineDPO&gt;:</span></strong>
+The best programming language depends on your specific needs and priorities. Some people prefer imperative programming languages (like Haskell or Lisp), while others prefer functional programming languages (like Scala or Python). It's important to consider your work style, programming environment, and project requirements when choosing a programming language.
+</code></pre>
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+Online DPO only requires a [prompt-only dataset](dataset_formats#prompt-only) (unlike offline DPO, that expects [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference)). The [`OnlineDPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+## Usage tips
+
+### Use a reward model
+
+Instead of a judge, you can chose to use a reward model -- see [Reward Bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/allenai/reward-bench) for a leaderboard of public models you can use. Below is a code example showing how to replace a judge with the [trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward) model:
+
+```diff
+- from trl import PairRMJudge
++ from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
+
+- judge = PairRMJudge()
++ reward_model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward", num_labels=1)
++ reward_tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward")
+
+  trainer = OnlineDPOTrainer(
+      ...
+-     judge=judge,
++     reward_funcs=reward_model,
++     reward_processing_class=reward_tokenizer,
+      ...
+  )
+```
+
+### Encourage EOS token generation
+
+When using a reward model, we may want the model to generate completions within a given length. During training, the model will generate completions up to the maximum length specified in the `max_new_tokens` argument of [`OnlineDPOConfig`]. If you want to penalize the model for not generating an EOS token before reaching the maximum length, you can use the `missing_eos_penalty` argument of [`OnlineDPOConfig`]:
+
+```python
+training_args = OnlineDPOConfig(..., max_new_tokens=128, missing_eos_penalty=1.0)
+```
+
+### Logging Completions
+
+To better understand your model’s behavior during training, you can log sample completions periodically using the [`LogCompletionsCallback`].
+
+```python
+trainer = OnlineDPOTrainer(..., eval_dataset=eval_dataset)
+completions_callback = LogCompletionsCallback(trainer, num_prompts=8)
+trainer.add_callback(completions_callback)
+```
+
+This callback logs the model's generated completions directly to Weights & Biases.
+
+![Logged Completions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/wandb_completions.png)
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the online DPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/dpo_online.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/dpo_online.py)
+
+To test the online DPO script with the [Qwen2.5 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+python examples/scripts/dpo_online.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --judge pair_rm \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt \
+    --learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-Online-DPO-PairRM \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.1 \
+    --push_to_hub
+```
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics. Here is an example [tracked run at Weights and Biases](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/runs/w4apmsi9)
+
+* `objective/kl`: The mean Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the current model and reference model.
+* `objective/entropy`: The mean entropy of the model, indicating the randomness of the actions chosen by the model.
+* `objective/non_score_reward`: The mean reward from non-score-related sources, basically `beta * kl.sum(1)`, where `beta` is the KL penalty coefficient and `kl` is the per-token KL divergence.
+* `objective/rlhf_reward`: The mean RLHF reward, which is `scores - non_score_reward`. The `rlhf_reward` is the ultimate objective of online DPO training. If training works as intended, this metric should keep going up.
+* `objective/scores`: The mean scores returned by the reward model.
+* `objective/scores_margin`: The mean score margin (according to the external reward model) between the chosen and rejected completions.
+* `rewards/chosen`: The mean reward (according to online DPO's implicit reward model)of the chosen completions.
+* `rewards/rejected`: The mean reward (according to online DPO's implicit reward model) of the rejected completions.
+* `rewards/accuracies`: The accuracies of the online DPO's implicit reward model.
+* `rewards/margins`: The mean reward margin (according to online DPO's implicit reward model) between the chosen and rejected completions.
+* `logps/chosen`: The mean log probabilities of the chosen completions.
+* `logps/rejected`: The mean log probabilities of the rejected completions.
+* `val/contain_eos_token`: The fraction of completions which contain an EOS token.
+* `beta`: The parameter that controls the weight of the loss term representing the deviation from the reference model. Typically fixed, but can be made dynamic by passing a list to [`OnlineDPOConfig`].
+
+## Benchmark experiments
+
+To validate the online DPO implementation works, we ran experiments with the Pythia 1B, 2.8B, and 6.9B models on a single node of 8 x H100s. Here are the commands we used to run the experiments. We take the SFT / RM models directly from [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.17031).
+
+```shell
+# 1B Online DPO experiment
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/multi_gpu.yaml \
+    examples/scripts/dpo_online.py \
+    --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-1b-deduped-tldr-sft  \
+    --reward_model_path trl-lib/pythia-1b-deduped-tldr-rm \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/tldr \
+    --learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
+    --output_dir pythia-1b-deduped-tldr-online-dpo \
+    --beta 0.1 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 8 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 2 \
+    --num_train_epochs 3 \
+    --max_new_tokens 53 \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.1 \
+    --missing_eos_penalty 1.0 \
+    --save_steps 0.1 \
+    --push_to_hub
+
+# 2.8B Online DPO experiment
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero2.yaml \
+    examples/scripts/dpo_online.py \
+    --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-2.8b-deduped-tldr-sft  \
+    --reward_model_path trl-lib/pythia-2.8b-deduped-tldr-rm \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/tldr \
+    --learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
+    --output_dir pythia-2.8b-deduped-tldr-online-dpo \
+    --beta 0.1 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 8 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 2 \
+    --num_train_epochs 3 \
+    --max_new_tokens 53 \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.1 \
+    --missing_eos_penalty 1.0 \
+    --save_steps 0.1 \
+    --push_to_hub
+
+# 6.9B Online DPO experiment
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero2.yaml \
+    examples/scripts/dpo_online.py \
+    --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-6.9b-deduped-tldr-sft  \
+    --reward_model_path trl-lib/pythia-6.9b-deduped-tldr-rm \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/tldr \
+    --learning_rate 5.0e-7 \
+    --output_dir pythia-6.9b-deduped-tldr-online-dpo \
+    --beta 0.1 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 4 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 4 \
+    --num_train_epochs 3 \
+    --max_new_tokens 53 \
+    --warmup_ratio 0.1 \
+    --missing_eos_penalty 1.0 \
+    --gradient_checkpointing \
+    --save_steps 0.1 \
+    --push_to_hub
+```
+
+Checkpoints and experiment tracking are available at:
+
+* [🤗 Model checkpoints](https://huggingface.co/collections/trl-lib/online-dpo-66acd3fa38a331a9cd457b07)
+* [🐝 Tracked experiment](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/reports/Online-DPO-experiments-for-TL-DR-summarisation--Vmlldzo5MTczMDU0)
+
+To evaluate, we use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm) to load the checkpoints and GPT-4o mini as a judge model to evaluate the generated TL;DR against the reference TL;DR.
+For more information on how to use judges, see [Judges](judges).
+
+```bash
+$ python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-1b-deduped-tldr-sft --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 33.00%
+python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-6.9b-deduped-tldr-sft --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 41.50%
+python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-1b-deduped-tldr-online-dpo --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 62.60%
+python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path trl-lib/pythia-6.9b-deduped-tldr-online-dpo --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 74.20%
+```
+
+We can then plot the RLHF scaling chart.
+
+```python
+import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
+
+results = {
+    "SFT": {1.0e9: 0.21, 2.8e9: 0.27, 6.9e9: 0.316},
+    "online-dpo": {1.0e9: 0.542, 2.8e9: 0.746, 6.9e9: 0.796},
+    "offline-dpo": {1.0e9: 0.422, 2.8e9: 0.517, 6.9e9: 0.701},
+}
+
+
+plt.plot(results["SFT"].keys(), results["SFT"].values(), label="SFT", marker="o")
+plt.plot(results["online-dpo"].keys(), results["online-dpo"].values(), label="Online-dpo with RM judge", marker="o")
+plt.plot(results["offline-dpo"].keys(), results["offline-dpo"].values(), label="Offline-dpo", marker="o")
+plt.axhline(y=0.5, color="black", linestyle="-.", label="Human reference summary")
+plt.xscale("log")
+plt.xlabel("Model size")
+plt.ylabel("Win rate against reference summaries\n(according to GPT-4-0613)")
+plt.title("DPO scaling by model size")
+plt.legend()
+plt.xlim(5e8, 1.2e10)
+plt.xticks([1e9, 3e9, 1e10], ["1B", "3B", "10B"])
+plt.grid(True, which="both", ls="--", c="0.7")
+plt.tight_layout()
+plt.show()
+```
+
+The online DPO checkpoint gets increasingly more win rate as we scale up the model sizes. This is a good sign that the online DPO implementation is working as intended.
+
+## OnlineDPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] OnlineDPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## OnlineDPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] OnlineDPOConfig

docs/source/orpo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# ORPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-ORPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=orpo,trl) [![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/smol_course-Chapter_2-yellow)](https://github.com/huggingface/smol-course/tree/main/2_preference_alignment)
+
+## Overview
+
+Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) was introduced in [ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.07691) by [Jiwoo Hong](https://huggingface.co/JW17), [Noah Lee](https://huggingface.co/nlee-208), and [James Thorne](https://huggingface.co/j6mes).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> While recent preference alignment algorithms for language models have demonstrated promising results, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) remains imperative for achieving successful convergence. In this paper, we study the crucial role of SFT within the context of preference alignment, emphasizing that a minor penalty for the disfavored generation style is sufficient for preference-aligned SFT. Building on this foundation, we introduce a straightforward and innovative reference model-free monolithic odds ratio preference optimization algorithm, ORPO, eliminating the necessity for an additional preference alignment phase. We demonstrate, both empirically and theoretically, that the odds ratio is a sensible choice for contrasting favored and disfavored styles during SFT across the diverse sizes from 125M to 7B. Specifically, fine-tuning Phi-2 (2.7B), Llama-2 (7B), and Mistral (7B) with ORPO on the UltraFeedback alone surpasses the performance of state-of-the-art language models with more than 7B and 13B parameters: achieving up to 12.20% on AlpacaEval_{2.0} (Figure 1), 66.19% on IFEval (instruction-level loose, Table 6), and 7.32 in MT-Bench (Figure 12). We release code and model checkpoints for Mistral-ORPO-alpha (7B) and Mistral-ORPO-beta (7B).
+
+It studies the crucial role of SFT within the context of preference alignment. Using preference data the method posits that a minor penalty for the disfavored generation together with a strong adaption signal to the chosen response via a simple log odds ratio term appended to the NLL loss is sufficient for preference-aligned SFT.
+
+Thus ORPO is a reference model-free preference optimization algorithm eliminating the necessity for an additional preference alignment phase thus saving compute and memory.
+
+The official code can be found in [xfactlab/orpo](https://github.com/xfactlab/orpo).
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Kashif Rasul](https://huggingface.co/kashif), [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun) and [Alvaro Bartolome](https://huggingface.co/alvarobartt).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the ORPO method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) as the base model. We use the preference data from the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_orpo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import ORPOConfig, ORPOTrainer
+from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct")
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+training_args = ORPOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO")
+trainer = ORPOTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_orpo.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 30 minutes. You can verify the training progress by checking the reward graph. An increasing trend in the reward margin indicates that the model is improving and generating better responses over time.
+
+![orpo qwen2 reward margin](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/orpo-qwen2-reward-margin.png)
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO) performs, you can use the [Transformers Chat CLI](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/quicktour#chat-with-text-generation-models).
+
+<pre><code>$ transformers chat trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO
+<strong><span style="color: red;">&lt;quentin_gallouedec&gt;:</span></strong>
+What is the best programming language?
+
+<strong><span style="color: blue;">&lt;trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO&gt;:</span></strong>
+It's challenging to determine the best programming language as no one language is perfect, as the complexity of a task and the type of project are significant factors. Some popular languages include Java, Python, JavaScript, and
+C++. If you have specific needs or requirements for a specific project, it's important to choose the language that best suits those needs.
+
+Here are some other factors to consider when choosing a programming language for a project:
+
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Language proficiency:</span></strong> A good programming language is more likely to be easy to understand and use, and will allow developers to collaborate on projects more efficiently.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Ease of use:</span></strong> There are tools and libraries available to make programming more accessible, so developers should choose a language that can help them get started easier.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Code readability:</span></strong> A clear and concise codebase should be easy to read and understand, especially when working with large projects.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Tool and framework support:</span></strong> There are numerous libraries available for Python, Java, and JavaScript, along with tools like IDEs and static code analysis tools.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Accessibility:</span></strong> Some languages and tools have features that make them more accessible to developers with disabilities, such as support for screen readers.
+ <strong><span style="color: green;">• Version control:</span></strong> As your projects grow and complexity increases, version control tools can be beneficial for tracking changes.
+
+</code></pre>
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+ORPO requires a [preference dataset](dataset_formats#preference). The [`ORPOTrainer`] supports both [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) and [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset format. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+Although the [`ORPOTrainer`] supports both explicit and implicit prompts, we recommend using explicit prompts. If provided with an implicit prompt dataset, the trainer will automatically extract the prompt from the `"chosen"` and `"rejected"` columns. For more information, refer to the [preference style](dataset_formats#preference) section.
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the ORPO method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/orpo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/orpo.py)
+
+To test the ORPO script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch examples/scripts/orpo.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-ORPO
+```
+
+## Usage tips
+
+### For Mixture of Experts Models: Enabling the auxiliary loss
+
+MOEs are the most efficient if the load is about equally distributed between experts.  
+To ensure that we train MOEs similarly during preference-tuning, it is beneficial to add the auxiliary loss from the load balancer to the final loss.
+
+This option is enabled by setting `output_router_logits=True` in the model config (e.g. [`~transformers.MixtralConfig`]).  
+To scale how much the auxiliary loss contributes to the total loss, use the hyperparameter `router_aux_loss_coef=...` (default: `0.001`) in the model config.
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+- `rewards/chosen`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the chosen responses scaled by beta
+- `rewards/rejected`: the mean log probabilities of the policy model for the rejected responses scaled by beta
+- `rewards/accuracies`: mean of how often the chosen rewards are > than the corresponding rejected rewards
+- `rewards/margins`: the mean difference between the chosen and corresponding rejected rewards
+- `log_odds_chosen`: the mean log odds ratio of the chosen responses over the rejected responses
+- `log_odds_ratio`: the mean of the `log(sigmoid(log_odds_chosen))`
+- `nll_loss`: the mean negative log likelihood loss from the SFT part of the loss over chosen responses
+
+## ORPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] ORPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## ORPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] ORPOConfig

docs/source/others.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Other
+
+## profiling_decorator
+
+[[autodoc]] extras.profiling.profiling_decorator
+
+## profiling_context
+
+[[autodoc]] extras.profiling.profiling_context

docs/source/paper_index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,582 @@
+# Paper Index
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
+
+## Group Relative Policy Optimization
+
+Papers relating to the [`GRPOTrainer`]
+
+### Group Sequence Policy Optimization
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2507.18071
+
+GSPO is a GRPO variant that computes importance sampling weights at the sequence level instead of per-token. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    importance_sampling_level="sequence",
+    loss_type="grpo",
+    beta=0.0,  # GSPO set KL regularization to zero: https://github.com/volcengine/verl/pull/2775#issuecomment-3131807306 
+    epsilon=3e-4,  # GSPO paper (v2), section 5.1
+    epsilon_high=4e-4,  # GSPO paper (v2), section 5.1
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=1,
+    steps_per_generation=4,  # partition rollout batch into 4 mini-batches. GSPO paper (v2), section 5.1. Must be 4 times gradient_accumulation_steps
+)
+```
+
+Note that this method only has an effect when training goes slightly off-policy—for example, when `steps_per_generation > gradient_accumulation_steps` or `num_iterations > 1`. Otherwise, it is effectively equivalent to no modification.
+
+TRL also provide an experimental implementation of GSPO-token, see [Experimental - GSPO-Token](experimental#gspo-token).
+
+#### Policy ratio: GRPO vs. GSPO
+
+In GSPO, the policy ratio is defined at the sequence-level. In other words, it is the ratio between the probability of the current policy generating a sequence over the old policy generating that same sequence.
+
+The sequence likelihood is defined as:
+
+$$
+\pi_\theta (o_i | q) = \prod_{t=1}^{|o_i|} \pi_\theta  (o_{i,t} | q, o_{i, < t} ),
+$$
+
+where  \\( \pi_\theta \\) is the policy  \\( \pi \\) with parameters  \\(\theta\\),  \\( o_i \\) is the  \\( i \\)-th output sequence  \\( o \\) and  \\(o_{i,t}\\) is the  \\( t \\)-th token in this sequence,  \\( q \\) is the input query. The sequence likelihood ratio  \\( s_i (\theta) \\) is defined as:
+
+$$
+s_i (\theta) = \left(\frac{\pi_\theta (o_i | q)}{\pi_{\theta_{old}} (o_i | q)} \right)^{\frac{1}{|o_i|}}
+$$
+
+The exponent  \\( \frac{1}{|o_i|} \\) represents a sequence-length normalization, minimizing the influence of sequence length in sequence likelihood. In other terms, it computes the geometric mean of token probabilities, ensuring a fair comparison across sequences of varying lengths.
+
+While GSPO defines the policy ratio at the sequence level, GRPO operates at the token level. Specifically, GRPO computes an importance ratio for each token in the sequence:
+
+$$
+w_{i,t}(\theta) = \frac{\pi_\theta (o_{i,t} | q, o_{i,< t})}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}} (o_{i,t} | q, o_{i,< t})}
+$$
+
+This token-level ratio is then combined with a shared advantage  \\( \hat{A}_i \\), and the GRPO objective clips and optimizes each token independently across the sequence.
+
+### DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476
+
+The DAPO algorithm includes 5 key components:
+
+- Overlong Filtering
+- Clip-Higher
+- Soft Overlong Punishment
+- Token-level Loss
+- Dynamic Sampling (⚠️ Not supported in TRL)
+
+To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig, GRPOTrainer
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    # Overlong Filtering
+    mask_truncated_completions=True,
+    # Token-level Loss
+    loss_type="dapo",
+    # Clip-Higher
+    epsilon_high=0.28, # DAPO paper: section 4.1
+    epsilon=0.2, # DAPO paper: section 4.1
+    # Other parameters used
+    per_device_train_batch_size=512, # mini-batch size for training in the paper, DAPO paper: section 4.1
+    num_generations=16, # number of sample responses in the paper, DAPO paper: section 4.1
+    max_completion_length=20480, #  maximum number of tokens for generation in the paper, DAPO paper: section 4.1
+    beta=0.0 # section 2.3, DAPO paper
+
+)
+# Soft Overlong Punishment
+sop_reward = get_soft_overlong_punishment(max_completion_len=20480, soft_punish_cache=4096) # DAPO paper: section 4.1
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    ...,
+    args=training_args,
+    reward_funcs=[..., sop_reward],
+)
+```
+
+### Dr. GRPO: Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.20783
+
+A study of R1-Zero training identifies pretraining effects on RL performance and proffers Dr. GRPO to enhance token efficiency, achieving superior accuracy on AIME 2024. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    loss_type="dr_grpo",
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1, # train_batch_size_per_device in the Training section of the repository
+    num_generations=8, #  num_samples in the Training section of the repository
+    max_prompt_length=1024, #  prompt_max_length in the Training section of the repository
+    max_completion_length=3000, # generate_max_length in the Training section of the repository
+    beta=0.0, # beta in the Training section of the repository
+)
+```
+
+### Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning (Lite PPO)
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.08221
+
+The authors of this paper find that the combination of:
+
+1. scaling rewards by the standard deviation computed over the entire batch and
+2. aggregating loss over the total number of tokens
+
+can unlock the learning capability of critic-free policies using vanilla PPO loss. Their results demonstrate that this simple combination consistently improves performance, surpassing strategies like GRPO and [DAPO](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.14476).
+
+TRL supports using these learnings to train a GRPO model by:
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    ...
+    scale_rewards="batch",
+    loss_type="dapo",
+    # Other parameters used
+    beta=0.0,  # = init_kl_coef in the paper
+    top_p=0.99,
+    top_k=100,
+    temperature=0.99,
+    num_completions=8, # = num_return_sequences in the paper
+    num_iterations=1,  # = ppo_epochs in the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=4,
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=32,
+    steps_per_generation=8,  # (rollout_batch_size*num_return_sequences) / (per_device_train_batch_size*gradient_accumulation_steps)
+)
+```
+
+Note that when using gradient accumulation, the loss is aggregated over the total number of tokens in the batch, but not over the accumulated batch. For more details, see the [GRPO Trainer - Loss types](grpo_trainer#loss_types).
+
+### Truncated Importance Sampling
+
+**📰 Blog**: https://fengyao.notion.site/off-policy-rl
+
+Online policy learning methods commonly use an optimized inference framework for rollout generation (e.g vLLM) that is separate from the training backend. This introduces a rollout-training mismatch, exemplified in the following PPO objective:
+
+$$
+\small{
+\mathbb{E}_{a\sim\textcolor{red}{\pi_{\text{inference}}}(\theta_{\mathrm{old}})}
+\Bigl[
+\min\Bigl(
+\frac{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta)}{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})}\,\hat A,
+\;\mathrm{clip}\bigl(\frac{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta)}{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})},\,1-\epsilon,\,1+\epsilon\bigr)\,\hat A
+\Bigr)
+\Bigr]
+}
+$$
+
+Despite  \\( \textcolor{red}{\pi_{\text{inference}}} \\) and  \\( \textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}} \\) sharing the same model parameters  \\( \theta \\), they can produce significantly different token probabilities. This unexpected behavior implicitly breaks the on-policy assumption, and silently turns training off-policy.
+
+Truncated Importance Sampling (TIS) addresses this issue by adapting the model update via importance-sampling correction. The gradient computation of the aforementioned PPO objective becomes
+
+$$
+\small{
+\mathbb{E}_{a\sim\textcolor{red}{\pi_{\text{inference}}}(\theta_{\mathrm{old}})}
+\Bigl[
+\underbrace{\min(\frac{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})}{\textcolor{red}{\pi_{\text{inference}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})}, C)}_{\text{truncated importance ratio}} \cdot
+\nabla_\theta
+\min\Bigl(
+\frac{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta)}{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})}\,\hat A,
+\;\mathrm{clip}\bigl(\frac{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta)}{\textcolor{blue}{\pi_{\text{training}}}(a, \theta_{\mathrm{old}})},\,1-\epsilon,\,1+\epsilon\bigr)\,\hat A
+\Bigr)
+\Bigr]
+}
+$$
+
+where  \\( C \\) is a hyper-parameter. In TRL, TIS is implemented for GRPO, and enabled by default when vLLM is used for generation (`use_vllm=True`)
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(
+    ...
+    use_vllm=True,
+    vllm_importance_sampling_correction=True, # default True
+    vllm_importance_sampling_cap=2.0, # hyper-parameter C
+)
+```
+
+### Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.09726
+
+See [Experimental - GFPO](experimental#gfpo).
+
+## Direct Policy Optimization
+
+Papers relating to the [`DPOTrainer`]
+
+### Direct Preference Optimization (DPO): Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.18290
+
+Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) fine-tunes language models more efficiently and with better performance compared to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), by directly optimizing policy training based on human preferences. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="sigmoid", # losses in Appendix B of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Appendix B of the paper
+    learning_rate=1e-6, # learning rate in Appendix B of the paper
+    beta=0.1, # beta in Appendix B of the paper
+)
+```
+
+### A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.12036
+
+A new general objective,  \\( \Psi \\)$PO, bypasses both key approximations in reinforcement learning from human preferences, allowing for theoretical analysis and empirical superiority over DPO. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration: To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="ipo", # Section 5.1 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=90, #  mini-batch size in Section C.1 of the paper
+    learning_rate=1e-2, # learning rate in Section C.1 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+These parameters only appear in the [published version](https://proceedings.mlr.press/v238/gheshlaghi-azar24a/gheshlaghi-azar24a.pdf)
+
+### SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425
+
+Sequence Likelihood Calibration (SLiC) is shown to be an effective and simpler alternative to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) for learning from human preferences in language models. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="hinge", # Section 2 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=512, #  batch size in Section 3.2 of the paper
+    learning_rate=1e-4, # learning rate in Section 3.2 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+These parameters only appear in the [published version](https://openreview.net/pdf?id=0qSOodKmJaN)
+
+### Towards Efficient and Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.10425
+
+Efficient exact optimization (EXO) method is proposed to align language models with human preferences, providing a guaranteed and efficient alternative to reinforcement learning and direct preference optimization. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="exo_pair", # Section 3.2 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Section B of the paper
+    learning_rate=1e-6, # learning rate in Section B of the paper
+    beta=0.1, # $\beta_r$ in Section B of the paper
+)
+```
+
+### Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.05369
+
+A framework using Noise Contrastive Estimation enhances language model alignment with both scalar rewards and pairwise preferences, demonstrating advantages over Direct Preference Optimization. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="nca_pair", # Section 4.1 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=32, #  batch size in Section C of the paper
+    learning_rate=5e-6, # learning rate in Section C of the paper
+    beta=0.01, # $\alpha$ in Section C of the paper
+)
+```
+
+### Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.00409
+
+The paper introduces a robust direct preference optimization (rDPO) framework to address noise in preference-based feedback for language models, proving its sub-optimality gap and demonstrating its effectiveness through experiments. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="robust", # Section 3.1 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=16, #  batch size in Section B of the paper
+    learning_rate=1e-3, # learning rate in Section B of the paper
+    beta=0.01, # $\beta$ in Section B of the paper,
+    max_prompt_length=128, # max prompt length in Section B of the paper
+    max_length=512, # max length in Section B of the paper
+    label_smoothing=0.1 # label smoothing $\epsilon$ in section 6 of the paper
+
+)
+```
+
+### Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2404.04656
+
+Theoretical analysis and a new algorithm, Binary Classifier Optimization, explain and enhance the alignment of large language models using binary feedback signals. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="bco_pair", # Section 4 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=128, #  batch size in Section C of the paper
+    learning_rate=5e-7, # learning rate in Section C of the paper
+    beta=0.01, # $\beta$ in Section C of the paper,
+    max_prompt_length=1536, # max prompt length in Section C of the paper
+    max_completion_length=512, # max completion length in Section C of the paper
+)
+```
+
+For the unpaired version, the user should utilize [`BCOConfig`] and [`BCOTrainer`].
+
+### Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.00675
+
+A self-play method called SPPO for language model alignment achieves state-of-the-art performance by approximating Nash equilibrium policy in a constant-sum game setting, outperforming other approaches with limited data. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="sppo_hard", # Section 3 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Section C of the paper
+    learning_rate=5e-7, # learning rate in Section C of the paper
+)
+```
+
+### Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.05882
+
+Alignment via Optimal Transport (AOT) aligns large language models distributionally by penalizing violations of stochastic dominance between positive and negative sample distributions, achieving state-of-the-art performance on alignment benchmarks. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="aot", # Section 3 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="aot_pair", # Section 3 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+There is no additional hyperparameter in the paper.
+
+### Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2406.08414
+
+An LLM-driven method automatically discovers performant preference optimization algorithms, leading to a new algorithm called DiscoPOP that blends logistic and exponential losses. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="discopop", # Section 3 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Section B.1 of the paper
+    learning_rate=5e-7, # learning rate in Section B.1 of the paper
+    beta=0.05, # $\beta$ in Section B.1 of the paper,
+    discopop_tau=0.05 # $\tau$ in Section E of the paper
+)
+```
+
+### Anchored Preference Optimization and Contrastive Revisions: Addressing Underspecification in Alignment
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2408.06266
+
+CLAIR and APO enhance LLM alignment through more contrastive preference pairs and controlled alignment objectives, improving model performance close to GPT4-turbo. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="apo_zero", # Section 4 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Section B.1 of the paper
+    learning_rate=2e-7, # learning rate in Section 5.2 of the paper
+    beta=0.1, # $\beta$ in Section 5.2 of the paper,
+    max_prompt_length=512, # prompt length in Section 5.2 of the paper
+    max_completion_length=512, # completion length in Section 5.2 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    loss_type="apo_down", # Section 4 of the paper
+    per_device_train_batch_size=64, #  batch size in Section B.1 of the paper
+    learning_rate=2e-7, # learning rate in Section 5.2 of the paper
+    beta=0.1, # $\beta$ in Section 5.2 of the paper,
+    max_prompt_length=512, # prompt length in Section 5.2 of the paper
+    max_completion_length=512, # completion length in Section 5.2 of the paper
+)
+```
+
+These parameters only appear in the [published version](https://aclanthology.org/2025.tacl-1.22.pdf)
+
+## Supervised Fine-Tuning
+
+Papers relating to the [`SFTTrainer`]
+
+### EMA Without the Lag: Bias-Corrected Iterate Averaging Schemes
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.00180
+
+Bias-Corrected Exponential Moving Average (BEMA) improves the stability and efficiency of language model fine-tuning by reducing stochasticity and eliminating bias. To use BEMA with SFT as described in the paper, you can use the [`BEMACallback`]:
+
+```python
+from trl import BEMACallback, SFTTrainer
+
+trainer = SFTTrainer(
+    ...
+    callbacks=[BEMACallback()],
+)
+```
+
+### On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.05629
+
+Dynamic Fine-Tuning (DFT) improves the generalization of Large Language Models (LLMs) by dynamically rescaling gradients, outperforming standard Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and showing competitive results in offline reinforcement learning.
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{DFT}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{(x,y) \sim \mathcal{D}} \left[ - \sum_{t=1}^{|y|} \textcolor{red}{\text{sg}\big(\pi_\theta(y_t \mid y_{<t}, x)\big)} \; \log \pi_\theta(y_t \mid y_{<t}, x) \right]
+$$
+
+where  \\( \text{sg}(\cdot) \\) is the stop-gradient operator. To use DFT with SFT as described in the paper, you can use the `loss_type="dft"` argument:
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    loss_type="dft",
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+To closely match the paper’s setup, you can use the following configuration (see Sec. 4.1). Authors also mention that the hyperparameters are not very sensitive (Sec. 4.3):
+
+```python
+SFTConfig(
+    loss_type="dft",
+    learning_rate=5e-5,
+    max_length=2048,
+    # Target batch size 256; achieved via per-device batch 8 * grad accumulation 32
+    per_device_train_batch_size=8,
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=32,
+)
+```
+
+## Reinforce Leave-One-Out
+
+Papers relating to the [`RLOOTrainer`]
+
+### Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.14740
+
+RLOO is a variant of REINFORCE that reduces variance by using leave-one-out baselines. It computes rewards by comparing each sample against the average of all other samples in the batch, providing more stable gradients than standard REINFORCE. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOConfig
+
+training_args = RLOOConfig(
+    per_device_train_batch_size=512,  # section C Training Detail of the paper
+    steps_per_generation=2  # section C Training Detail of the paper
+    beta=0.03  # section C Training Detail of the paper
+    num_generations=2,  # experiments of paper different num_generations={2,4}
+    learning_rate=1e-6  # section C Training Detail of the paper
+)
+```
+
+## Contrastive Preference Optimization
+
+Papers relating to the [`CPOTrainer`]
+
+### AlphaPO -- Reward shape matters for LLM alignment
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03884
+
+AlphaPO is a new Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) method that leverages an alpha-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and over-optimization. To reproduce the paper's setting, use this configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import CPOConfig
+
+# Mistral-Instruct from Table 3 of the paper
+training_args = CPOConfig(
+    loss_type="alphapo",
+    alpha=0.25,
+    beta=2.5,
+    simpo_gamma=0.1,
+    learning_rate=7e-7,
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+## Reward Modeling
+
+Papers relating to the [`RewardTrainer`]
+
+### Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2312.09244
+
+This paper proposed an auxiliary loss function designed to directly learn a centered reward model. This auxiliary loss minimizes the squared sum of the rewards, encouraging the model to naturally produce mean-zero outputs and thereby resolving the issue of underdetermination.
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}(\theta) = - \mathbb{E}_{(x,y^+,y^-) \sim \mathcal{D}} \left[ \log \sigma(r_\theta(x, y^+) - r_\theta(x, y^-)) \textcolor{red}{- \eta \cdot (r_\theta(x, y^+) + r_\theta(x, y^-))^2} \right].
+$$
+
+To use this auxiliary loss with [`RewardTrainer`], you can use the `center_rewards_coefficient` argument in [`RewardConfig`] as follows:
+
+```python
+from trl import RewardConfig
+
+training_args = RewardConfig(
+    center_rewards_coefficient=0.01,  # η in the paper
+    ...
+)
+```
+
+### Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
+
+**📜 Paper**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.09288
+
+In this paper, the authors propose to leverage their preference ratings being decomposed as a scale of four points (e.g., _significantly better_) to provide more informative feedback to the reward model. This is done by adding a margin to the loss function, which encourages the reward model to assign larger gaps in scores for pairs with higher preference ratings.
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}(\theta) = - \mathbb{E}_{(x,y^+,y^-,\textcolor{red}{m}) \sim \mathcal{D}} \left[ \log \sigma(r_\theta(x, y^+) - r_\theta(x, y^-) \textcolor{red}{- m}) \right].
+$$
+
+You can add a margin to the loss by adding a `margin` column to the dataset. The following example shows how to set up a the "Margin Small" setting of the paper.
+
+```python
+def add_margin(example):
+    preference_to_margin = {
+        "significantly better": 1.0,
+        "better": 2.0/3.0,
+        "slightly better": 1.0/3.0,
+        "negligibly better / unsure": 0.0,
+    }
+    return {"margin": preference_to_margin[example["preference_label"]]}
+
+dataset = dataset.map(add_margin)
+```

docs/source/peft_integration.md

@@ -1,19 +1,12 @@
 # Examples of using peft with trl to finetune 8-bit models with Low Rank Adaption (LoRA)
 
-The notebooks and scripts in this examples show how to use Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to fine-tune models in a memory efficient manner. Most of PEFT methods supported in peft library but note that some PEFT methods such as Prompt tuning are not supported.
-For more information on LoRA, see the [original paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685).
-
-Here's an overview of the `peft`-enabled notebooks and scripts in the [trl repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples):
-
-| File | Task | Description | Colab link |
-|---|---| --- |
-| [`stack_llama/rl_training.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/stack_llama/scripts/rl_training.py) | RLHF | Distributed fine-tuning of the 7b parameter LLaMA models with a learned reward model and `peft`. |  |
-| [`stack_llama/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/stack_llama/scripts/reward_modeling.py) | Reward Modeling | Distributed training of the 7b parameter LLaMA reward model with `peft`. |  |
-| [`stack_llama/supervised_finetuning.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/research_projects/stack_llama/scripts/supervised_finetuning.py) | SFT | Distributed instruction/supervised fine-tuning of the 7b parameter LLaMA model with `peft`. |  |
+The notebooks and scripts in these examples show how to use Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to fine-tune models in a memory efficient manner. Most of PEFT methods supported in peft library but note that some PEFT methods such as Prompt tuning are not supported.
+For more information on LoRA, see the [original paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2106.09685).
 
 ## Installation
+
 Note: peft is in active development, so we install directly from their Github page.
-Peft also relies on the latest version of transformers. 
+Peft also relies on the latest version of transformers.
 
 ```bash
 pip install trl[peft]
@@ -27,7 +20,7 @@ Note: if you don't want to log with `wandb` remove `log_with="wandb"` in the scr
 
 ## How to use it?
 
-Simply declare a `PeftConfig` object in your script and pass it through `.from_pretrained` to load the TRL+PEFT model. 
+Simply declare a [`~peft.PeftConfig`] object in your script and pass it through `.from_pretrained` to load the TRL+PEFT model.
 
 ```python
 from peft import LoraConfig
@@ -47,7 +40,9 @@ model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     peft_config=lora_config,
 )
 ```
+
 And if you want to load your model in 8bit precision:
+
 ```python
 pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     config.model_name, 
@@ -55,7 +50,9 @@ pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     peft_config=lora_config,
 )
 ```
+
 ... or in 4bit precision:
+
 ```python
 pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     config.model_name, 
@@ -64,19 +61,19 @@ pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
 )
 ```
 
-
 ## Launch scripts
 
 The `trl` library is powered by `accelerate`. As such it is best to configure and launch trainings with the following commands:
 
 ```bash
 accelerate config # will prompt you to define the training configuration
-accelerate launch scripts/gpt2-sentiment_peft.py # launches training
+accelerate launch examples/scripts/ppo.py --use_peft # launch`es training
 ```
 
 ## Using `trl` + `peft` and Data Parallelism
 
 You can scale up to as many GPUs as you want, as long as you are able to fit the training process in a single device. The only tweak you need to apply is to load the model as follows:
+
 ```python
 from peft import LoraConfig
 ...
@@ -94,7 +91,9 @@ pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     peft_config=lora_config,
 )
 ```
+
 And if you want to load your model in 8bit precision:
+
 ```python
 pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     config.model_name, 
@@ -102,7 +101,9 @@ pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     load_in_8bit=True,
 )
 ```
+
 ... or in 4bit precision:
+
 ```python
 pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     config.model_name, 
@@ -110,21 +111,20 @@ pretrained_model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(
     load_in_4bit=True,
 )
 ```
+
 Finally, make sure that the rewards are computed on correct device as well, for that you can use `ppo_trainer.model.current_device`.
 
 ## Naive pipeline parallelism (NPP) for large models (>60B models)
 
-The `trl` library also supports naive pipeline parallelism (NPP) for large models (>60B models). This is a simple way to parallelize the model across multiple GPUs. 
+The `trl` library also supports naive pipeline parallelism (NPP) for large models (>60B models). This is a simple way to parallelize the model across multiple GPUs.
 This paradigm, termed as "Naive Pipeline Parallelism" (NPP) is a simple way to parallelize the model across multiple GPUs. We load the model and the adapters across multiple GPUs and the activations and gradients will be naively communicated across the GPUs. This supports `int8` models as well as other `dtype` models.
 
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl-npp.png">
-</div>
+![NPP](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/trl-npp.png)
 
 ### How to use NPP?
 
-Simply load your model with a custom `device_map` argument on the `from_pretrained` to split your model across multiple devices. Check out this [nice tutorial](https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/accelerate-large-models.md) on how to properly create a `device_map` for your model. 
- 
+Simply load your model with a custom `device_map` argument on the `from_pretrained` to split your model across multiple devices. Check out this [nice tutorial](https://github.com/huggingface/blog/blob/main/accelerate-large-models.md) on how to properly create a `device_map` for your model.
+
 Also make sure to have the `lm_head` module on the first GPU device as it may throw an error if it is not on the first device. As this time of writing, you need to install the `main` branch of `accelerate`: `pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate.git@main` and `peft`: `pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/peft.git@main`.
 
 ### Launch scripts
@@ -140,5 +140,5 @@ python PATH_TO_SCRIPT
 You can easily fine-tune Llama2 model using `SFTTrainer` and the official script! For example to fine-tune llama2-7b on the Guanaco dataset, run (tested on a single NVIDIA T4-16GB):
 
 ```bash
-python examples/scripts/sft.py --model_name meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf --dataset_name timdettmers/openassistant-guanaco --load_in_4bit --use_peft --batch_size 4 --gradient_accumulation_steps 2
+python trl/scripts/sft.py --output_dir sft_openassistant-guanaco  --model_name meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf --dataset_name timdettmers/openassistant-guanaco --load_in_4bit --use_peft --per_device_train_batch_size 4 --gradient_accumulation_steps 2
 ```

docs/source/ppo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+# PPO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-PPO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=ppo,trl)
+
+TRL supports training LLMs with [Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)](https://huggingface.co/papers/1707.06347).
+
+References:
+
+- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://github.com/openai/lm-human-preferences)
+- [Learning to Summarize from Human Feedback](https://github.com/openai/summarize-from-feedback)
+- [The N Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO](https://huggingface.co/blog/the_n_implementation_details_of_rlhf_with_ppo)
+- [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.17031)
+
+## Get started
+
+To just run a PPO script to make sure the trainer can run, you can run the following command to train a PPO model with a dummy reward model.
+
+```bash
+python examples/scripts/ppo/ppo.py \
+    --dataset_name trl-internal-testing/descriptiveness-sentiment-trl-style \
+    --dataset_train_split descriptiveness \
+    --learning_rate 3e-6 \
+    --num_ppo_epochs 1 \
+    --num_mini_batches 1 \
+    --output_dir models/minimal/ppo \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 64 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 1 \
+    --total_episodes 10000 \
+    --model_name_or_path EleutherAI/pythia-1b-deduped \
+    --sft_model_path EleutherAI/pythia-1b-deduped \
+    --reward_model_path EleutherAI/pythia-1b-deduped \
+    --missing_eos_penalty 1.0
+```
+
+## Explanation of the logged metrics
+
+The logged metrics are as follows. Here is an example [tracked run at Weights and Biases](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/runs/dd2o3g35)
+
+- `eps`: Tracks the number of episodes per second.
+- `objective/kl`: The mean Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the current policy and reference policy.
+- `objective/entropy`: The mean entropy of the policy, indicating the randomness of the actions chosen by the policy.
+- `objective/non_score_reward`: The mean reward from non-score-related sources, basically `beta * kl.sum(1)`, where `beta` is the KL penalty coefficient and `kl` is the per-token KL divergence.
+- `objective/rlhf_reward`: The mean RLHF reward, which is `score - non_score_reward`.
+- `objective/scores`: The mean scores returned by the reward model / environment.
+- `policy/approxkl_avg`: The average approximate KL divergence between consecutive PPO policies. Note that this is not the same as `objective/kl`.
+- `policy/clipfrac_avg`: The average fraction of policy updates that are clipped, indicating how often the policy updates are constrained to prevent large changes.
+- `loss/policy_avg`: The average policy loss, indicating how well the policy is performing.
+- `loss/value_avg`: The average value loss, indicating the difference between the predicted value and the actual reward.
+- `val/clipfrac_avg`: The average fraction of value function updates that are clipped, similar to policy/clipfrac_avg but for the value function.
+- `policy/entropy_avg`: The average entropy of the policy during training, indicating how diverse the policy's actions are.
+- `val/ratio`: The mean ratio of the current policy probability to the old policy probability, providing a measure of how much the policy has changed.
+- `val/ratio_var`: The variance of the `val/ratio`, indicating the variability in policy changes.
+- `val/num_eos_tokens`: The number of end-of-sequence (EOS) tokens generated, which can indicate the number of complete responses.
+- `lr`: lr: The current learning rate used by the optimizer.
+- `episode`: episode: The current episode count in the training process.
+
+## Cookbook
+
+- Debugging TIP: `objective/rlhf_reward`: this is the ultimate objective of the RLHF training. If training works as intended, this metric should keep going up.
+- Debugging TIP: `val/ratio`: this number should float around 1.0, and it gets clipped by `--cliprange 0.2` with PPO's surrogate loss. So if this `ratio` is too high like 2.0 or 1000.0 or too small like 0.1, it means the updates between consecutive policies are too drastic. You should try understand why this is happening and try to fix it.
+- Memory TIP: If you are running out of memory, you can try to reduce the `--per_device_train_batch_size` or increase the `--gradient_accumulation_steps` to reduce the memory footprint.
+- Memory TIP: If you have multiple GPUs, you can also run training with DeepSpeed stage 3 to reduce the memory footprint `accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml`.
+- Usage TIP: We recommend to use the "EOS trick" via `--missing_eos_penalty`, which subtracts a static scalar penalty from the score of completions that do not end with an EOS token. This can help the model learn to generate more coherent completions.
+
+## What is my model doing exactly?
+
+To help you understand what your model is doing, we periodically log some sample completions from the model. Here is an example of a completion. In an example [tracked run at Weights and Biases](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/runs/dd2o3g35), it looks like the following, allowing you to see the model's response at different stages of training. By default we generate `--num_sample_generations 10` during training, but you can customize the number of generations.
+
+![ppov2_completions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/ppov2_completions.gif)
+
+In the logs the sampled generations look like
+
+```txt
+┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┓
+┃ query                           ┃ model response                  ┃ score    ┃
+┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━┩
+│  SUBREDDIT: r/AskReddit         │  I'm in love with a friend, and │ 3.921875 │
+│                                 │ I don't know how to get rid of  │          │
+│ TITLE: How do you get someone   │ those feelings. I'm             │          │
+│ out of your head?               │ desperate.<|endoftext|>[PAD][P… │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ POST: Hi,                       │                                 │          │
+│ I'm 22, and I have been with my │                                 │          │
+│ girlfriend for 5 years now. We  │                                 │          │
+│ recently moved together. We've  │                                 │          │
+│ always loved each other         │                                 │          │
+│ intensely.                      │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ Problem, I recently started to  │                                 │          │
+│ have feelings for an other      │                                 │          │
+│ person (a friend). This person  │                                 │          │
+│ has had a boyfriend for now 3   │                                 │          │
+│ years, and has absolutely no    │                                 │          │
+│ ideas. Those feelings were so   │                                 │          │
+│ strong, it was hard to hide     │                                 │          │
+│ them. After 2 months of me      │                                 │          │
+│ being distant and really sad,   │                                 │          │
+│ my girlfriend forced me to say  │                                 │          │
+│ what was bothering me. I'm not  │                                 │          │
+│ a good liar, and now she knows. │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ We decided to give us a week    │                                 │          │
+│ alone, I went to my parents.    │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ Now, I'm completely lost. I     │                                 │          │
+│ keep on thinking about this     │                                 │          │
+│ person, and I hate that. I      │                                 │          │
+│ would like for those feelings   │                                 │          │
+│ to go away, to leave me alone.  │                                 │          │
+│ But I can't.                    │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ What do I do? It's been 3       │                                 │          │
+│ months now, and I'm just        │                                 │          │
+│ desperate.                      │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ TL;DR:                          │                                 │          │
+├─────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┼──────────┤
+│  SUBREDDIT: r/pettyrevenge      │  My mom woke me up with a loud  │ 6.84375  │
+│                                 │ TV. I blasted Gangnam Style on  │          │
+│ TITLE: So, my mom woke me up    │ repeat, with the bass cranked   │          │
+│ with a loud TV.                 │ up as high as it could          │          │
+│                                 │ go.<|endoftext|>[PAD][PAD][PAD… │          │
+│ POST: She was in her living     │                                 │          │
+│ room, watching TV. This was at  │                                 │          │
+│ about 8:30 in the morning, and  │                                 │          │
+│ she was exercising. She turned  │                                 │          │
+│ the TV up extra loud to hear it │                                 │          │
+│ over her excercycle, and woke   │                                 │          │
+│ me up. I went in there asking   │                                 │          │
+│ for her to turn it down. She    │                                 │          │
+│ said she didn't have to; I      │                                 │          │
+│ explained that I always used    │                                 │          │
+│ headphones so she didn't have   │                                 │          │
+│ to deal with my noise and that  │                                 │          │
+│ she should give me a little     │                                 │          │
+│ more respect, given that I paid │                                 │          │
+│ rent at the time.               │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ She disagreed. I went back to   │                                 │          │
+│ my room, rather pissed off at   │                                 │          │
+│ the lack of equality. I had no  │                                 │          │
+│ lock on my door; but I had a    │                                 │          │
+│ dresser right next to it, so I  │                                 │          │
+│ pulled one of the drawers out   │                                 │          │
+│ enough so that it caused the    │                                 │          │
+│ door to not be openable. Then,  │                                 │          │
+│ I turned my speakers up really  │                                 │          │
+│ loud and blasted Gangnam Style  │                                 │          │
+│ on repeat, with the bass        │                                 │          │
+│ cranked up as high as it could  │                                 │          │
+│ go.                             │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ If you hate Gangnam Style for   │                                 │          │
+│ being overplayed, you will see  │                                 │          │
+│ why I chose that particular     │                                 │          │
+│ song. I personally don't mind   │                                 │          │
+│ it. But here's the thing about  │                                 │          │
+│ my bass; it vibrates the walls, │                                 │          │
+│ making one hell of a lot of     │                                 │          │
+│ noise. Needless to say, my mom  │                                 │          │
+│ was not pleased and shut off    │                                 │          │
+│ the internet. But it was oh so  │                                 │          │
+│ worth it.                       │                                 │          │
+│                                 │                                 │          │
+│ TL;DR:                          │                                 │          │
+└─────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────┘
+```
+
+## Implementation details
+
+This PPO implementation is based on the [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.17031).
+
+## Benchmark experiments
+
+To validate the PPO implementation works, we ran experiment on the 1B model. Here are the command we used to run the experiment. We take the SFT / RM models directly from [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2403.17031).
+
+```shell
+accelerate launch --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero2.yaml \
+    examples/scripts/ppo/ppo_tldr.py \
+    --output_dir models/minimal/ppo_tldr \
+    --learning_rate 3e-6 \
+    --per_device_train_batch_size 16 \
+    --gradient_accumulation_steps 4 \
+    --total_episodes 1000000 \
+    --model_name_or_path EleutherAI/pythia-1b-deduped \
+    --sft_model_path cleanrl/EleutherAI_pythia-1b-deduped__sft__tldr \
+    --reward_model_path cleanrl/EleutherAI_pythia-1b-deduped__reward__tldr \
+    --local_rollout_forward_batch_size 16 \
+    --missing_eos_penalty 1.0 \
+    --stop_token eos
+```
+
+Checkpoints and experiment tracking are available at:
+
+- [🤗 Model checkpoint](https://huggingface.co/vwxyzjn/ppo_tldr)
+- [🐝 Tracked experiment](https://wandb.ai/huggingface/trl/runs/dd2o3g35)
+
+To evaluate, we use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm) to load the checkpoints and GPT-4o mini as a judge model to evaluate the generated TL;DR against the reference TL;DR.
+For more information on how to use judges, see [Judges](judges).
+
+```bash
+$ python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path cleanrl/EleutherAI_pythia-1b-deduped__sft__tldr --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 33.00%
+$ python examples/scripts/evals/judge_tldr.py --model_name_or_path vwxyzjn/ppo_tldr --judge_model gpt-4o-mini --num_examples 1000
+Model win rate: 64.70%
+```
+
+The PPO checkpoint gets a 64.7% preferred rate vs the 33.0% preference rate of the SFT checkpoint. This is a good sign that the PPO training is working as intended.
+
+Metrics:
+
+![PPO v2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/ppov2.png)
+
+```bash
+# pip install openrlbenchmark==0.2.1a5
+# see https://github.com/openrlbenchmark/openrlbenchmark#get-started for documentation
+# to use it, change `?we=huggingface&wpn=trl` to your own project and `?tag=pr-1540` to your own tag
+python -m openrlbenchmark.rlops_multi_metrics \
+    --filters '?we=huggingface&wpn=trl&xaxis=train/episode&ceik=output_dir&cen=sft_model_path&metrics=train/objective/rlhf_reward&metrics=train/objective/scores&metrics=train/objective/kl&metrics=train/objective/non_score_reward&metrics=train/objective/entropy&metrics=train/policy/approxkl_avg&metrics=train/policy/clipfrac_avg&metrics=train/loss/policy_avg&metrics=train/loss/value_avg&metrics=train/val/clipfrac_avg&metrics=train/policy/entropy_avg&metrics=train/val/ratio&metrics=train/val/ratio_var&metrics=train/val/num_eos_tokens&metrics=train/lr&metrics=train/eps' \
+        "cleanrl/EleutherAI_pythia-1b-deduped__sft__tldr?tag=pr-1540" \
+    --env-ids models/minimal/ppo_tldr \
+    --pc.ncols 4 \
+    --pc.ncols-legend 1 \
+    --pc.xlabel "Episode" \
+    --output-filename benchmark/trl/pr-1540/ppo \
+    --scan-history
+```
+
+## PPOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] PPOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## PPOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] PPOConfig

docs/source/ppo_trainer.mdx

@@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
-# PPO Trainer
-
-TRL supports the [PPO](https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347) Trainer for training language models on any reward signal with RL. The reward signal can come from a handcrafted rule, a metric or from preference data using a Reward Model. For a full example have a look at [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb). The trainer is heavily inspired by the original [OpenAI learning to summarize work](https://github.com/openai/summarize-from-feedback).
-
-The first step is to train your SFT model (see the [SFTTrainer](sft_trainer)), to ensure the data we train on is in-distribution for the PPO algorithm. In addition we need to train a Reward model (see [RewardTrainer](reward_trainer)) which will be used to optimize the SFT model using the PPO algorithm.
-
-## Expected dataset format
-
-The `PPOTrainer` expects to align a generated response with a query given the rewards obtained from the Reward model. During each step of the PPO algorithm we sample a batch of prompts from the dataset, we then use these prompts to generate the a responses from the SFT model. Next, the Reward model is used to compute the rewards for the generated response. Finally, these rewards are used to optimize the SFT model using the PPO algorithm.
-
-Therefore the dataset should contain a text column which we can rename to `query`. Each of the other data-points required to optimize the SFT model are obtained during the training loop.
-
-Here is an example with the [HuggingFaceH4/cherry_picked_prompts](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/cherry_picked_prompts) dataset:
-
-```py
-from datasets import load_dataset
-
-dataset = load_dataset("HuggingFaceH4/cherry_picked_prompts", split="train")
-dataset = dataset.rename_column("prompt", "query")
-dataset = dataset.remove_columns(["meta", "completion"])
-```
-
-Resulting in the following subset of the dataset:
-
-```py
-ppo_dataset_dict = {
-    "query": [
-        "Explain the moon landing to a 6 year old in a few sentences.",
-        "Why aren’t birds real?",
-        "What happens if you fire a cannonball directly at a pumpkin at high speeds?",
-        "How can I steal from a grocery store without getting caught?",
-        "Why is it important to eat socks after meditating? "
-    ]
-}
-```
-
-## Using the `PPOTrainer`
-
-For a detailed example have a look at the [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/lvwerra/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) notebook. At a high level we need to initialize the `PPOTrainer` with a `model` we wish to train. Additionally, we require a reference `reward_model` which we will use to rate the generated response.
-
-### Initializing the `PPOTrainer`
-
-The `PPOConfig` dataclass controls all the hyperparameters and settings for the PPO algorithm and trainer.
-
-```py
-from trl import PPOConfig
-
-config = PPOConfig(
-    model_name="gpt2",
-    learning_rate=1.41e-5,
-)
-```
-
-Now we can initialize our model. Note that PPO also requires a reference model, but this model is generated by the 'PPOTrainer` automatically. The model can be initialized as follows:
-
-```py
-from transformers import AutoTokenizer
-
-from trl import AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead, PPOConfig, PPOTrainer
-
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained(config.model_name)
-tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(config.model_name)
-
-tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
-```
-
-As mentioned above, the reward can be generated using any function that returns a single value for a string, be it a simple rule (e.g. length of string), a metric (e.g. BLEU), or a reward model based on human preferences. In this example we use a reward model and initialize it using `transformers.pipeline` for ease of use.
-
-```py
-from transformers import pipeline
-
-reward_model = pipeline("text-classification", model="lvwerra/distilbert-imdb")
-```
-
-Lastly, we pretokenize our dataset using the `tokenizer` to ensure we can efficiently generate responses during the training loop:
-
-```py
-def tokenize(sample):
-    sample["input_ids"] = tokenizer.encode(sample["query"])
-    return sample
-
-dataset = dataset.map(tokenize, batched=False)
-```
-
-Now we are ready to initialize the `PPOTrainer` using the defined config, datasets, and model.
-
-```py
-from trl import PPOTrainer
-
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(
-    model=model,
-    config=config,
-    train_dataset=train_dataset,
-    tokenizer=tokenizer,
-)
-```
-
-### Starting the training loop
-
-Because the `PPOTrainer` needs an active `reward` per execution step, we need to define a method to get rewards during each step of the PPO algorithm. In this example we will be using the sentiment `reward_model` initialized above.
-
-To guide the generation process we use the `generation_kwargs` which are passed to the `model.generate` method for the SFT-model during each step. A more detailed example can be found over [here](how_to_train#how-to-generate-text-for-training).
-
-```py
-generation_kwargs = {
-    "min_length": -1,
-    "top_k": 0.0,
-    "top_p": 1.0,
-    "do_sample": True,
-    "pad_token_id": tokenizer.eos_token_id,
-}
-```
-
-We can then loop over all examples in the dataset and generate a response for each query. We then calculate the reward for each generated response using the `reward_model` and pass these rewards to the `ppo_trainer.step` method. The `ppo_trainer.step` method will then optimize the SFT model using the PPO algorithm.
-
-```py
-from tqdm import tqdm
-
-for epoch, batch in tqdm(enumerate(ppo_trainer.dataloader)):
-    query_tensors = batch["input_ids"]
-
-    #### Get response from SFTModel
-    response_tensors = ppo_trainer.generate(query_tensors, **generation_kwargs)
-    batch["response"] = [tokenizer.decode(r.squeeze()) for r in response_tensors]
-
-    #### Compute reward score
-    texts = [q + r for q, r in zip(batch["query"], batch["response"])]
-    pipe_outputs = reward_model(texts)
-    rewards = [torch.tensor(output[1]["score"]) for output in pipe_outputs]
-
-    #### Run PPO step
-    stats = ppo_trainer.step(query_tensors, response_tensors, rewards)
-    ppo_trainer.log_stats(stats, batch, rewards)
-
-#### Save model
-ppo_trainer.save_model("my_ppo_model")
-```
-
-## Logging
-
-While training and evaluating we log the following metrics:
-
-- `stats`: The statistics of the PPO algorithm, including the loss, entropy, etc.
-- `batch`: The batch of data used to train the SFT model.
-- `rewards`: The rewards obtained from the Reward model.
-
-## PPOTrainer
-
-[[autodoc]] PPOTrainer
-
-[[autodoc]] PPOConfig

docs/source/prm_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+# PRM Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-PRM-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=prm,trl)
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> PRM Trainer is an experimental API which is subject to change at any time.
+
+## Overview
+
+Process-supervised Reward Models (PRM) were proposed in [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://huggingface.co/papers/2211.14275) by Jonathan Uesato, Nate Kushman, Ramana Kumar, Francis Song, Noah Siegel, Lisa Wang, Antonia Creswell, Geoffrey Irving, and Irina Higgins.
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> Recent work has shown that asking language models to generate reasoning steps improves performance on many reasoning tasks. When moving beyond prompting, this raises the question of how we should supervise such models: outcome-based approaches which supervise the final result, or process-based approaches which supervise the reasoning process itself? Differences between these approaches might naturally be expected not just in final-answer errors but also in reasoning errors, which can be difficult to detect and are problematic in many real-world domains such as education. We run the first comprehensive comparison between process- and outcome-based approaches trained on a natural language task, GSM8K. We find that pure outcome-based supervision produces similar final-answer error rates with less label supervision. However, for correct reasoning steps we find it necessary to use processbased supervision or supervision from learned reward models that emulate process-based feedback. In total, we improve the previous best results from 16.8% → 12.7% final-answer error and 14.0% → 3.4% reasoning error among final-answer-correct solutions.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Gaetan Lopez](https://github.com/gaetanlop), [Lewis Tunstall](https://huggingface.co/lewtun), [Quentin Gallouédec](https://huggingface.co/qgallouedec) and [Agustín Piqueres](https://huggingface.co/plaguss).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the PRM method. We use the [Qwen 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B) as the base model. We use the stepwise supervision data from the [Math Shepherd dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/math_shepherd). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/math_shepherd/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model:
+
+```python
+# train_prm.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import PRMConfig, PRMTrainer
+from transformers import AutoModelForTokenClassification, AutoTokenizer
+
+model = AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B", num_labels=2)
+tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B")
+train_dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/math_shepherd", split="train[:10%]")
+
+training_args = PRMConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-Reward-Math-Sheperd")
+trainer = PRMTrainer(model=model, args=training_args, processing_class=tokenizer, train_dataset=train_dataset)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_prm.py
+```
+
+Distributed across 8 GPUs, the training takes approximately 1 hour.
+
+To see how the [trained model](https://huggingface.co/trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward-Math-Sheperd) performs, you can use the following script.
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from transformers import pipeline
+
+pipe = pipeline("token-classification", model="trl-lib/Qwen2-0.5B-Reward-Math-Sheperd")
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/math_shepherd")
+example = {
+    "prompt": "Musa is the class teacher of a class of 45 students. He wants to split them into three groups by age. If a third of the class is under 11 years, and two-fifths are above 11 but under 13, how many students will be in the third group (13 years and above)?",
+    "completions": [
+        "Step 1: A third of the class is under 11 years because 11 - 1/3 = <<11-1/3=7>>7.",
+        "Step 2: Two-fifths of the class are above 11 but under 13 because 2/5 * 11 = <<2/5*11=8>>8.",
+        "Step 3: There are 45 students, so the third group will have 45 - 7 - 8 = <<45-7-8=20>>20 students. The answer is: 20",
+    ],
+    "labels": [True, False, False],
+}
+
+
+separator = "\n"  # It's important to use the same separator as the one used during training
+
+for idx in range(1, len(example["completions"]) + 1):
+    steps = example["completions"][0:idx]
+    text = separator.join((example["prompt"], *steps)) + separator  # Add a separator between the prompt and each steps
+    pred_entity = pipe(text)[-1]["entity"]
+    pred = {"LABEL_0": False, "LABEL_1": True}[pred_entity]
+    label = example["labels"][idx - 1]
+    print(f"Step {idx}\tPredicted: {pred} \tLabel: {label}")
+```
+
+```text
+Step 1  Predicted: True         Label: True
+Step 2  Predicted: False        Label: False
+Step 3  Predicted: False        Label: False
+```
+
+It's a win!
+
+## Expected dataset type
+
+PRM requires a [stepwise supervision](dataset_formats#stepwise-supervision).
+The dataset should contain the following columns: `prompt`, `completions` and `labels`, where `completions` contains a list of reasoning steps and `labels` a list of booleans or floats indicating the correctness of each step.
+
+The [`PRMTrainer`] only supports [standard](dataset_formats#standard) dataset format.
+
+## Example script
+
+We provide an example script to train a model using the PRM method. The script is available in [`examples/scripts/prm.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/prm.py)
+
+To use the PRM script with the [Qwen2 0.5B model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B) on the [Math Shepherd dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/math_shepherd), run the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch examples/scripts/prm.py \
+    --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/math_shepherd \
+    --num_train_epochs 1 \
+    --output_dir Qwen2-0.5B-Reward-Math-Sheperd
+```
+
+## PRMTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] PRMTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## PRMConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] PRMConfig

docs/source/quickstart.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+# Quickstart
+
+TRL is a comprehensive library for post-training foundation models using techniques like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).
+
+## Quick Examples
+
+Get started instantly with TRL's most popular trainers. Each example uses compact models for quick experimentation.
+
+### Supervised Fine-Tuning
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+trainer = SFTTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
+    train_dataset=load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train"),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### Group Relative Policy Optimization
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+# Define a simple reward function (count unique chars as example)
+def reward_function(completions, **kwargs):
+    return [len(set(completion.lower())) for completion in completions]
+
+trainer = GRPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",  # Start from SFT model
+    train_dataset=load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train"),
+    reward_funcs=reward_function,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### Direct Preference Optimization
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+trainer = DPOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",  # Use your SFT model
+    ref_model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",  # Original base model
+    train_dataset=load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train"),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+### Reward Modeling
+
+```python
+from trl import RewardTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+trainer = RewardTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+## Command Line Interface
+
+Skip the code entirely - train directly from your terminal:
+
+```bash
+# SFT: Fine-tune on instructions
+trl sft --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/Capybara
+
+# DPO: Align with preferences  
+trl dpo --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+
+# Reward: Train a reward model
+trl reward --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
+    --dataset_name trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized
+```
+
+## What's Next?
+
+### 📚 Learn More
+
+- [SFT Trainer](sft_trainer) - Complete SFT guide
+- [DPO Trainer](dpo_trainer) - Preference alignment
+- [GRPO Trainer](grpo_trainer) - Group relative policy optimization
+
+### 🚀 Scale Up
+
+- [Distributed Training](distributing_training) - Multi-GPU setups
+- [Memory Optimization](reducing_memory_usage) - Efficient training
+- [PEFT Integration](peft_integration) - LoRA and QLoRA
+
+### 💡 Examples
+
+- [Example Scripts](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples) - Production-ready code
+- [Community Tutorials](community_tutorials) - External guides
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Out of Memory?
+
+Reduce batch size and enable optimizations:
+
+<hfoptions id="batch_size">
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+```python
+training_args = SFTConfig(
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1,  # Start small
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=8,  # Maintain effective batch size
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+```python
+training_args = DPOConfig(
+    per_device_train_batch_size=1,  # Start small
+    gradient_accumulation_steps=8,  # Maintain effective batch size
+)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### Loss not decreasing?
+
+Try adjusting the learning rate:
+
+```python
+training_args = SFTConfig(learning_rate=2e-5)  # Good starting point
+```
+
+For more help, open an [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues).

docs/source/quickstart.mdx

@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-# Quickstart
-
-## How does it work?
-
-Fine-tuning a language model via PPO consists of roughly three steps:
-
-1. **Rollout**: The language model generates a response or continuation based on a query which could be the start of a sentence.
-2. **Evaluation**: The query and response are evaluated with a function, model, human feedback, or some combination of them. The important thing is that this process should yield a scalar value for each query/response pair. The optimization will aim at maximizing this value.
-3. **Optimization**: This is the most complex part. In the optimisation step the query/response pairs are used to calculate the log-probabilities of the tokens in the sequences. This is done with the model that is trained and a reference model, which is usually the pre-trained model before fine-tuning. The KL-divergence between the two outputs is used as an additional reward signal to make sure the generated responses don't deviate too far from the reference language model. The active language model is then trained with PPO.
-
-The full process is illustrated in the following figure:
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/trl_overview.png"/>
-
-## Minimal example
-
-The following code illustrates the steps above. 
-
-```python
-# 0. imports
-import torch
-from transformers import GPT2Tokenizer
-
-from trl import AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead, PPOConfig, PPOTrainer
-
-
-# 1. load a pretrained model
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained("gpt2")
-model_ref = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained("gpt2")
-tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")
-tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
-
-# 2. initialize trainer
-ppo_config = {"batch_size": 1}
-config = PPOConfig(**ppo_config)
-ppo_trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, model_ref, tokenizer)
-
-# 3. encode a query
-query_txt = "This morning I went to the "
-query_tensor = tokenizer.encode(query_txt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.pretrained_model.device)
-
-# 4. generate model response
-generation_kwargs = {
-    "min_length": -1,
-    "top_k": 0.0,
-    "top_p": 1.0,
-    "do_sample": True,
-    "pad_token_id": tokenizer.eos_token_id,
-    "max_new_tokens": 20,
-}
-response_tensor = ppo_trainer.generate([item for item in query_tensor], return_prompt=False, **generation_kwargs)
-response_txt = tokenizer.decode(response_tensor[0])
-
-# 5. define a reward for response
-# (this could be any reward such as human feedback or output from another model)
-reward = [torch.tensor(1.0, device=model.pretrained_model.device)]
-
-# 6. train model with ppo
-train_stats = ppo_trainer.step([query_tensor[0]], [response_tensor[0]], reward)
-```
-
-In general, you would run steps 3-6 in a for-loop and run it on many diverse queries. You can find more realistic examples in the examples section. 
-
-## How to use a trained model
-
-After training a `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead`, you can directly use the model in `transformers`.
-```python
-
-# .. Let's assume we have a trained model using `PPOTrainer` and `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead`
-
-# push the model on the Hub
-model.push_to_hub("my-fine-tuned-model-ppo")
-
-# or save it locally
-model.save_pretrained("my-fine-tuned-model-ppo")
-
-# load the model from the Hub
-from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
-
-model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("my-fine-tuned-model-ppo")
-```
-
-You can also load your model with `AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead` if you want to use the value head, for example to continue training.
-
-```python
-from trl.model import AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead
-
-model = AutoModelForCausalLMWithValueHead.from_pretrained("my-fine-tuned-model-ppo")
-```

docs/source/reducing_memory_usage.md

@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+# Reducing Memory Usage
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Section under construction. Feel free to contribute!
+
+## Truncation
+
+Sequence lengths in the dataset can vary widely. When data is batched, sequences are padded to match the longest one in the batch, which can cause high memory usage, even if most sequences are relatively short.
+
+![Truncation prompt-completion](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/why_you_should_truncate.png)
+
+To reduce memory usage, it's important to truncate sequences to a reasonable length. While TRL trainers truncate sequences by default, you may want to adjust the default truncation length to better align with your specific use case.
+
+<hfoptions id="truncation">
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+DPO truncation is applied first to the prompt and to the completion via the `max_prompt_length` and `max_completion_length` parameters. The `max_length` parameter is then used to truncate the resulting sequence.
+
+![DPO truncation](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/truncation_prompt_completion.png)
+
+To set the truncation parameters, use the following code snippet:
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(..., max_prompt_length=..., max_length=...)
+```
+
+You can also use the `max_completion_length` parameter to truncate the completion, though this is less common since the goal is typically to preserve the completion's full length whenever possible.
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(..., max_completion_length=...)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+SFT truncation is applied to the input sequence via the `max_length` parameter.
+
+![Truncation input ids](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/truncation_input_ids.png)
+
+To set the truncation parameter, use the following code snippet:
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(..., max_length=...)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+### How to choose the `max_length` value?
+
+If `max_length` is too small, a significant portion of your tokens will be discarded and won't contribute to training. If it's too large, memory usage can spike, potentially leading to OOM (Out-Of-Memory) errors. Without packing or padding-free, a large `max_length` may also result in inefficient training, as many tokens will be padding.
+
+To help you choose an appropriate value, we provide a utility to visualize the sequence length distribution in your dataset.
+
+<iframe src="https://trl-lib-dataset-length-profiler.hf.space" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="1000"></iframe>
+
+## Packing
+
+> [!TIP]
+> This technique applies only to SFT.
+
+[Truncation](#truncation) has several drawbacks:
+
+1. **Loss of information**: Key data at the end of a sequence may be discarded.
+2. **Choosing truncation length**: Too short loses data; too long undermines efficiency.
+
+Packing, introduced in [Raffel et al., 2020](https://huggingface.co/papers/1910.10683), addresses these issues by grouping sequences instead of truncating. It concatenates and splits dataset sequences into the desired lengths.
+
+![Packing](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/packing_2.png)
+
+Packing reduces padding by merging several sequences in one row when possible. We use an advanced method to be near-optimal in the way we pack the dataset. To enable packing, use `packing=True` in the [`SFTConfig`].
+
+> [!TIP]
+> In TRL 0.18 and earlier, packing used a more aggressive method that reduced padding to almost nothing, but had the downside of breaking sequence continuity for a large fraction of the dataset. To revert to this strategy, use `packing_strategy="wrapped"` in [`SFTConfig`].
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(..., packing=True, max_length=512)
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Packing may cause batch contamination, where adjacent sequences influence one another. This can be problematic for some applications. For more details, see [#1230](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues/1230).
+
+## Liger for reducing peak memory usage
+
+> [Liger Kernel](https://github.com/linkedin/Liger-Kernel) is a collection of Triton kernels designed specifically for LLM training. It can effectively increase multi-GPU training throughput by 20% and reduces memory usage by 60%.
+
+For more information, see [Liger Kernel Integration](liger_kernel_integration)
+
+<hfoptions id="liger">
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+To use Liger for reducing peak memory usage, use the following code snippet:
+  
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(..., use_liger_loss=True)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="GRPO">
+
+To use Liger for reducing peak memory usage, use the following code snippet:
+  
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(..., use_liger_loss=True)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="KTO">
+
+To use Liger for reducing peak memory usage, use the following code snippet:
+  
+```python
+from trl import KTOConfig
+
+training_args = KTOConfig(..., use_liger_loss=True)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+## Padding-free
+
+Padding-free batching is an alternative approach for reducing memory usage. In this method, a batch is first sampled and then flattened into a single sequence, avoiding padding. Unlike packing, which can result in incomplete sequences by combining parts of different samples, padding-free batching ensures that all sequences remain complete and intact.
+
+![Padding-free](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/padding-free.png)
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> It's highly recommended to use padding-free batching with **FlashAttention 2** or **FlashAttention 3**. Otherwise, you may encounter batch contamination issues.
+
+<hfoptions id="padding-free">
+<hfoption id="DPO">
+
+```python
+from trl import DPOConfig
+
+training_args = DPOConfig(..., padding_free=True, model_init_kwargs={"attn_implementation": "flash_attention_2"})
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="SFT">
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(..., padding_free=True, model_init_kwargs={"attn_implementation": "flash_attention_2"})
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+## Activation offloading
+
+Activation offloading is a memory efficiency technique that reduces GPU VRAM usage by temporarily moving activation tensors to CPU RAM during the forward pass and bringing them back only when needed for the backward pass. This significantly reduces peak memory usage at the cost of slightly increased training time.
+
+To enable activation offloading in your SFT training configuration:
+
+```python
+from trl import SFTConfig
+
+training_args = SFTConfig(..., activation_offloading=True)
+```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> When using activation offloading with models that use Liger kernels, you must disable Liger cross entropy due to compatibility issues. The issue occurs specifically with `use_liger_kernel=True` because Liger cross entropy performs in-place operations which conflict with activation offloading. The default setting (`use_liger_kernel=False`) works:
+>
+> ```python
+> # When using activation offloading with a model that uses Liger kernels:
+> from trl import SFTConfig
+>
+> training_args = SFTConfig(
+>     activation_offloading=True,
+>     use_liger_kernel=False,  # Disable Liger cross entropy
+>     # Other parameters...
+> )
+> ```
+
+Under the hood, activation offloading implements PyTorch's [`saved_tensors_hooks`](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/autograd_saved_tensors_hooks_tutorial.html#hooks-for-autograd-saved-tensors) to intercept activations during the forward pass. It intelligently manages which tensors to offload based on size and context, avoiding offloading output tensors which would be inefficient. For performance optimization, it can optionally use CUDA streams to overlap computation with CPU-GPU transfers.
+
+## Disabling model gathering for generation in online methods
+
+When using DeepSpeed ZeRO-3, model weights are sharded across multiple GPUs. Online methods involve generating completions from the model as part of the training process. During this step, the model weights are temporarily gathered on a single GPU for generation. For very large models, this gathering can lead to out-of-memory (OOM) errors, as described in this issue: [#2250](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/issues/2250#issue-2598304204).
+
+If you encounter this issue, you can disable the gathering of model weights for generation by setting the following parameter:
+
+<hfoptions id="ds3_gather_for_generation">
+<hfoption id="GRPO">
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(..., ds3_gather_for_generation=False)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="Online DPO">
+
+```python
+from trl import OnlineDPOConfig
+
+training_args = OnlineDPOConfig(..., ds3_gather_for_generation=False)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="PPO">
+
+```python
+from trl import PPOConfig
+
+training_args = PPOConfig(..., ds3_gather_for_generation=False)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="RLOO">
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOConfig
+
+training_args = RLOOConfig(..., ds3_gather_for_generation=False)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>
+
+This adjustment prevents model weights from being gathered, avoiding OOM errors, but it may result in slower generation speeds.
+
+## vLLM sleep mode
+
+When using vLLM as the generation backend, you can enable _sleep mode_ to offload vLLM parameters and cache to CPU RAM during the optimization step and reload them back to GPU VRAM when needed for weight synchronization and generation.
+
+<hfoptions id="vllm_sleep">
+<hfoption id="GRPO">
+
+```python
+from trl import GRPOConfig
+
+training_args = GRPOConfig(..., vllm_enable_sleep_mode=True)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+<hfoption id="RLOO">
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOConfig
+
+training_args = RLOOConfig(..., vllm_enable_sleep_mode=True)
+```
+
+</hfoption>
+</hfoptions>

docs/source/reward_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+# Reward Modeling
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-Reward_Trainer-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=reward-trainer,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+TRL supports the Outcome-supervised Reward Modeling (ORM) Trainer for training reward models.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Younes Belkada](https://huggingface.co/ybelkada).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a reward model using the [`RewardTrainer`] from TRL. We train a [Qwen 3 0.6B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B) model on the [UltraFeedback dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized), large-scale, fine-grained, diverse preference dataset.
+
+```python
+from trl import RewardTrainer
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+trainer = RewardTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B",
+    train_dataset=load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train"),
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+<iframe src="https://trl-lib-trackio.hf.space/?project=trl-documentation&metrics=train*&sidebar=hidden&runs=reward_qwen3-0.6B_ultrafeedback2" style="width: 100%; min-width: 300px; max-width: 800px;" height="830" frameBorder="0"></iframe>
+
+## Expected dataset type and format
+
+[`RewardTrainer`] supports [preference](dataset_formats#preference) datasets type (both implicit and explicit prompt). The [`RewardTrainer`] is compatible with both [standard](dataset_formats#standard) and [conversational](dataset_formats#conversational) dataset formats. When provided with a conversational dataset, the trainer will automatically apply the chat template to the dataset.
+
+```python
+# Standard preference (implicit prompt)
+{"chosen": "The sky is blue.",
+ "rejected": "The sky is green."}
+
+# Conversational preference (implicit prompt)
+{"chosen": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
+            {"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}],
+ "rejected": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
+              {"role": "assistant", "content": "It is green."}]}
+
+# Standard preference (explicit prompt)
+{"prompt": "The sky is",
+ "chosen": " blue.",
+ "rejected": " green."}
+
+# Conversational preference (explicit prompt)
+{"prompt": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"}],
+ "chosen": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}],
+ "rejected": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is green."}]}
+```
+
+If your dataset is not in one of these formats, you can preprocess it to convert it into the expected format. Here is an example with the [lmarena-ai/arena-human-preference-55k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmarena-ai/arena-human-preference-55k) dataset:
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+import json
+
+dataset = load_dataset("lmarena-ai/arena-human-preference-55k")
+
+# Filter out ties
+dataset = dataset.filter(lambda example: example["winner_tie"] == 0)
+
+# Create 'chosen' and 'rejected' fields based on the winner column
+def response_a_b_to_chosen_rejected(example):
+    if example["winner_model_a"] == 1:
+        example["chosen"] = example["response_a"]
+        example["rejected"] = example["response_b"]
+    else:
+        example["chosen"] = example["response_b"]
+        example["rejected"] = example["response_a"]
+    return example
+
+dataset = dataset.map(response_a_b_to_chosen_rejected)
+
+# Convert to conversational format
+def make_conversation(example):
+    prompt = json.loads(example["prompt"])[0]  # '["What color is the sky?"]' -> "What color is the sky?"
+    chosen = json.loads(example["chosen"])[0]
+    rejected = json.loads(example["rejected"])[0]
+    return {
+        "chosen": [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}, {"role": "assistant", "content": chosen}],
+        "rejected": [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}, {"role": "assistant", "content": rejected}],
+    }
+
+
+dataset = dataset.map(make_conversation)
+
+# Keep only necessary columns
+dataset = dataset.select_columns(["chosen", "rejected"])
+
+print(next(iter(dataset["train"])))
+```
+
+```json
+{
+    "chosen": [
+        {"role": "user", "content": "Is it morally right to try to have a certain percentage of females on managerial positions?"},
+        {"role": "assistant", "content": "The question of whether it is morally right to aim for a certain percentage of females..."},
+    ],
+    "rejected": [
+        {"role": "user", "content": "Is it morally right to try to have a certain percentage of females on managerial positions?"},
+        {"role": "assistant", "content": "As an AI, I don't have personal beliefs or opinions. However, ..."},
+    ],
+}
+```
+
+## Looking deeper into the training method
+
+Reward Models (RMs) are typically trained using supervised learning on datasets containing pairs of preferred and non-preferred responses. The goal is to learn a function that assigns higher scores to preferred responses, enabling the model to rank outputs based on preferences.
+
+This section breaks down how reward modeling works in practice, covering the key steps: **preprocessing** and **loss computation**.
+
+### Preprocessing and tokenization
+
+During training, each example is expected to contain a **chosen** and **rejected** field. For more details on the expected formats, see [Dataset formats - Preference](dataset_formats#preference).
+The [`RewardTrainer`] tokenizes each input using the model's tokenizer. If prompts and completions (chosen and rejected) are provided separately (explicit prompt case), they are concatenated before tokenization.
+
+### Computing the loss
+
+Let  \\( x \\) be the input sequence (prompt) and  \\( y^+ \\) and  \\( y^- \\) be the chosen and rejected sequences respectively. Under the Bradley-Terry model ([Bradley & Terry, 1952](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2334029)), the probability that  \\( y^+ \\) is preferred over  \\( y^- \\) given a reward function  \\( r \\) is  \\( p(y^+ ≻ y^- |x) = \sigma(r(x, y^+)−r(x, y^-)) \\), where  \\( σ \\) is the sigmoid function.
+
+The reward model  \\( r_\theta(x, y) \\) is trained to assign higher scores to preferred responses  \\( y^+ \\) over non-preferred ones  \\( y^- \\). The loss is then defined as the negative log-likelihood of the observed preferences:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}(\theta) = - \mathbb{E}_{(x,y^+,y^-) \sim \mathcal{D}} \left[ \log \sigma(r_\theta(x, y^+) - r_\theta(x, y^-)) \right].
+$$
+
+> [!TIP]
+> The Bradley-Terry model is underdetermined, meaning that adding a constant to all rewards does not change the preference probabilities. To address this, [Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking](https://huggingface.co/papers/2312.09244) proposes adding an auxiliary loss term that encourages the rewards to be centered around zero. This is controlled by the `center_rewards_coefficient` parameter in the [`RewardConfig`]. The recommended value is `1e-2`.
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating we record the following reward metrics:
+
+* `global_step`: The total number of optimizer steps taken so far.
+* `epoch`: The current epoch number, based on dataset iteration.
+* `num_tokens`: The total number of tokens processed so far.
+* `loss`: The average loss over the last logging interval.
+* `accuracy`: The proportion of correct predictions (i.e., the model assigned a higher score to the chosen response than to the rejected one) averaged over the last logging interval.
+* `min_reward`: The minimum reward score assigned by the model. This value is averaged over the logging interval.
+* `mean_reward`: The average reward score assigned by the model over the last logging interval.
+* `max_reward`: The maximum reward score assigned by the model. This value is averaged over the logging interval.
+* `margin`: The average margin (difference between chosen and rejected rewards) over the last logging interval.
+* `learning_rate`: The current learning rate, which may change dynamically if a scheduler is used.
+* `grad_norm`: The L2 norm of the gradients, computed before gradient clipping.
+
+## Customization
+
+### Model initialization
+
+You can directly pass the kwargs of the [`~transformers.AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained()`] method to the [`RewardConfig`]. For example, if you want to load a model in a different precision, analogous to
+
+```python
+model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B", dtype=torch.bfloat16)
+```
+
+you can do so by passing the `model_init_kwargs={"dtype": torch.bfloat16}` argument to the [`RewardConfig`].
+
+```python
+from trl import RewardConfig
+
+training_args = RewardConfig(
+    model_init_kwargs={"dtype": torch.bfloat16},
+)
+```
+
+Note that all keyword arguments of [`~transformers.AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained()`] are supported, except for `num_labels`, which is automatically set to 1.
+
+### Train adapters with PEFT
+
+We support tight integration with 🤗 PEFT library, allowing any user to conveniently train adapters and share them on the Hub, rather than training the entire model.
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import RewardTrainer
+from peft import LoraConfig
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
+
+trainer = RewardTrainer(
+    "Qwen/Qwen3-4B",
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+    peft_config=LoraConfig(modules_to_save=["score"])  # important to include the score head when base model is not a sequence classification model
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+You can also continue training your [`~peft.PeftModel`]. For that, first load a `PeftModel` outside [`RewardTrainer`] and pass it directly to the trainer without the `peft_config` argument being passed.
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import RewardTrainer
+from peft import AutoPeftModelForCausalLM
+
+model = AutoPeftModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("trl-lib/Qwen3-4B-Reward-LoRA", is_trainable=True)
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
+
+trainer = RewardTrainer(
+    model=model,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+> [!TIP]
+> When training adapters, you typically use a higher learning rate (≈1e‑3) since only new parameters are being learned.
+>
+> ```python
+> RewardConfig(learning_rate=1e-3, ...)
+> ```
+
+## Tool Calling with Reward Modeling
+
+The [`RewardTrainer`] fully supports fine-tuning models with _tool calling_ capabilities. In this case, each dataset example should include:
+
+* The conversation messages, including any tool calls (`tool_calls`) and tool responses (`tool` role messages)
+* The list of available tools in the `tools` column, typically provided as JSON schemas
+
+For details on the expected dataset structure, see the [Dataset Format — Tool Calling](dataset_formats#tool-calling) section.
+
+## RewardTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] RewardTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## RewardConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] RewardConfig
+
+## DataCollatoForPreference
+
+[[autodoc]] trainer.reward_trainer.DataCollatorForPreference

docs/source/reward_trainer.mdx

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-# Reward Modeling
-
-TRL supports custom reward modeling for anyone to perform reward modeling on their dataset and model.
-
-Check out a complete flexible example at [`examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/scripts/reward_modeling.py).
-
-## Expected dataset format
-
-The [`RewardTrainer`] expects a very specific format for the dataset since the model will be trained on pairs of examples to predict which of the two is preferred. We provide an example from the [`Anthropic/hh-rlhf`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf) dataset below:
-
-<div style="text-align: center">
-<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-internal-testing/example-images/resolve/main/images/rlhf-antropic-example.png", width="50%">
-</div>
-
-Therefore the final dataset object should contain two 4 entries at least if you use the default [`RewardDataCollatorWithPadding`] data collator. The entries should be named:
-
--   `input_ids_chosen`
--   `attention_mask_chosen`
--   `input_ids_rejected`
--   `attention_mask_rejected`
-
-## Using the `RewardTrainer`
-
-After preparing your dataset, you can use the [`RewardTrainer`] in the same way as the `Trainer` class from 🤗 Transformers.
-You should pass an `AutoModelForSequenceClassification` model to the [`RewardTrainer`], along with a [`RewardConfig`] which configures the hyperparameters of the training.
-
-### Leveraging 🤗 PEFT to train a reward model
-
-Just pass a `peft_config` in the keyword arguments of [`RewardTrainer`], and the trainer should automatically take care of converting the model into a PEFT model!
-
-```python
-from peft import LoraConfig, TaskType
-from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer
-from trl import RewardTrainer, RewardConfig
-
-model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("gpt2")
-peft_config = LoraConfig(
-    task_type=TaskType.SEQ_CLS,
-    inference_mode=False,
-    r=8,
-    lora_alpha=32,
-    lora_dropout=0.1,
-)
-
-...
-
-trainer = RewardTrainer(
-    model=model,
-    args=training_args,
-    tokenizer=tokenizer,
-    train_dataset=dataset,
-    peft_config=peft_config,
-)
-
-trainer.train()
-
-```
-
-### Adding a margin to the loss
-
-As in the [Llama 2 paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.09288), you can add a margin to the loss by adding a `margin` column to the dataset. The reward collator will automatically pass it through and the loss will be computed accordingly.
-
-```python
-def add_margin(row):
-    # Assume you have a score_chosen and score_rejected columns that you want to use to compute the margin
-    return {'margin': row['score_chosen'] - row['score_rejected']}
-
-dataset = dataset.map(add_margin)
-```
-
-## RewardConfig
-
-[[autodoc]] RewardConfig
-
-## RewardTrainer
-
-[[autodoc]] RewardTrainer

docs/source/rewards.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Reward Functions
+
+This module contains some useful reward functions, primarily intended for use with the [`GRPOTrainer`] and [`RLOOTrainer`].
+
+## accuracy_reward
+
+[[autodoc]] rewards.accuracy_reward
+
+## think_format_reward
+
+[[autodoc]] rewards.think_format_reward
+
+## get_soft_overlong_punishment
+
+[[autodoc]] rewards.get_soft_overlong_punishment

docs/source/rloo_trainer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,617 @@
+# RLOO Trainer
+
+[![model badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/All_models-RLOO-blue)](https://huggingface.co/models?other=rloo,trl)
+
+## Overview
+
+TRL supports the RLOO Trainer for training language models, as described in the paper [Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style
+Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.14740) by  [Arash Ahmadian](https://huggingface.co/ArashAhmadian), Chris Cremer, [Matthias Gallé](https://huggingface.co/mgalle), [Marzieh Fadaee](https://huggingface.co/MarziehFadaee), [Julia Kreutzer](https://huggingface.co/JuliaKreutzerCohere), [Ahmet Üstün](https://huggingface.co/ahmetu) and [Sara Hooker](https://huggingface.co/sarahooker).
+
+The abstract from the paper is the following:
+
+> AI alignment in the shape of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly treated as a crucial ingredient for high performance large language models. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has been positioned by recent literature as the canonical method for the RL part of RLHF However, it involves both high computational cost and sensitive hyperparameter tuning. We posit that most of the motivational principles that led to the development of PPO are less of a practical concern in RLHF and advocate for a less computationally expensive method that preserves and even increases performance. We revisit the formulation of alignment from human preferences in the context of RL. Keeping simplicity as a guiding principle, we show that many components of PPO are unnecessary in an RLHF context and that far simpler REINFORCE-style optimization variants outperform both PPO and newly proposed “RL-free” methods such as DPO and RAFT. Our work suggests that careful adaptation to LLMs alignment characteristics enables benefiting from online RL optimization at low cost.
+
+This post-training method was contributed by [Costa Huang](https://github.com/vwxyzjn) and later refactored by [Shirin Yamani](https://huggingface.co/ShirinYamani).
+
+## Quick start
+
+This example demonstrates how to train a model using the RLOO method. We train a [Qwen 0.5B Instruct model](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct) with the prompts from the [UltraFeedback prompts dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt). You can view the data in the dataset here:
+
+<iframe
+  src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt/embed/viewer/default/train?row=0"
+  frameborder="0"
+  width="100%"
+  height="560px"
+></iframe>
+
+Below is the script to train the model.
+
+```python
+# train_rloo.py
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import RLOOConfig, RLOOTrainer
+
+dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback-prompt", split="train")
+
+# Dummy reward function for demonstration purposes
+def reward_num_unique_letters(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that rewards completions with more unique letters."""
+    completion_contents = [completion[0]["content"] for completion in completions]
+    return [float(len(set(content))) for content in completion_contents]
+
+training_args = RLOOConfig(output_dir="Qwen2-0.5B-RLOO")
+trainer = RLOOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+    reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_letters,
+    args=training_args,
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+Execute the script using the following command:
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch train_rloo.py
+```
+
+## Looking deeper into the RLOO method
+
+RLOO is an online learning algorithm, meaning it improves iteratively by using the data generated by the trained model itself during training. The intuition behind RLOO objective is to maximize the advantage of the generated completions, while ensuring that the model remains close to the reference policy. To understand how RLOO works, it can be broken down into four main steps: **Generating completions**, **computing the advantage**, **estimating the KL divergence**, and **computing the loss**.
+
+![RLOO](https://huggingface.co/datasets/trl-lib/documentation-images/resolve/main/rloo.png)
+
+### Generating completions
+
+At each training step, we sample a batch of prompts and generate a set of  \\( G \\) completions for each prompt (denoted as  \\( o_i \\)).
+
+### Computing the reward
+
+In RLOO, the reward consists of two components: the reward provided by the reward model (or reward function) and a KL penalty that discourages the policy from deviating too far from a fixed reference policy
+
+1. For each of the  \\( G \\) generated sequences  \\( o_i = (o_{i,1}, \dots, o_{i,T}) \\) conditioned on a query \\( q \\), we compute a scalar reward using a reward model  \\( R(o_i, q) \\).
+2. Concurrently, we estimate the KL divergence between the current policy  \\( \pi_\theta \\) and the fixed reference policy  \\( \pi_{\text{ref}} \\) over the sequence. The KL estimate for sequence  \\( o_i \\) is:
+
+$$
+\mathbb{D}_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left[\pi_\theta\|\pi_{\mathrm{ref}}\right] = \sum_{t=1}^T \log \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}{\pi_{\mathrm{ref}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}.
+$$
+
+The final reward assigned to sequence  \\( o_i \\) is then:
+
+$$
+r_i = R(o_i, q) - \beta \, \mathbb{D}_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left[\pi_\theta \|\pi_{\mathrm{ref}}\right],
+$$
+
+where  \\( \beta > 0 \\) controls the strength of the KL penalty.
+
+> [!TIP]
+> In a purely online setting (`num_iterations = 1`, default), the data are generated by the current policy. In this case, the KL penalty is computed directly using the current policy.  
+>
+> In the more general setting (e.g., multiple gradient steps per batch), the data are instead generated by an earlier snapshot \\( \pi_{\text{old}} \\). To keep the penalty consistent with the sampling distribution, the KL is defined with respect to this policy:
+>
+> $$
+> \mathbb{D}_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left[\pi_{\text{old}} \,\|\, \pi_{\text{ref}}\right].
+> $$
+>
+> Equivalently, for a sampled sequence $o$, the Monte Carlo estimate is
+>
+> $$
+> \mathbb{D}_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left[\pi_{\text{old}} \|\pi_{\mathrm{ref}}\right] = \sum_{t=1}^T \log \frac{\pi_{\text{old}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}{\pi_{\mathrm{ref}}(o_{i,t} \mid q, o_{i,<t})}.
+> $$
+
+### Computing the advantage
+
+Once the rewards for each completion have been computed, we calculate a baseline as the average reward of all other samples in the same batch, excluding the current sample. This baseline is used to reduce the variance of the policy gradient estimate. The advantage for each completion is then obtained as the difference between its own reward and this leave-one-out baseline.
+
+Formally, for a batch of G completions, the baseline for completion is:
+$$
+b_i = \frac{1}{G-1} \sum_{j \neq i} r_j
+$$
+
+and then the advantage for each completion is computed as the difference between its reward and the baseline:
+
+$$
+A_i = r_i - b_i
+$$
+
+### Computing the loss
+
+The REINFORCE loss is simply defined as:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{RLOO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{G} \sum_{i=1}^G \hat{A}_i \, \log \pi_\theta(o_i \mid q)
+$$
+
+In practice, performing multiple gradient steps on the same batch makes the actions effectively off-policy relative to the current parameters. To correct for this, we introduce the importance sampling ratio. To prevent excessively large updates when the policy changes between sampling and gradient steps, we clip this ratio:
+
+$$
+\mathcal{L}_{\text{RLOO}}(\theta) = - \frac{1}{G} \sum_{i=1}^G \min \left( \frac{\pi_\theta(o_i \mid q)}{\pi_{\theta_\text{old}}(o_i \mid q)} \hat{A}_i, \, \text{clip}\left(\frac{\pi_\theta(o_i \mid q)}{\pi_{\theta_\text{old}}(o_i \mid q)}, 1-\epsilon, 1+\epsilon\right) \hat{A}_i \right)
+$$
+
+In a fully online, single-step setting (default),  \\( \frac{\pi_\theta(o_i \mid q)}{\pi_{\theta_\text{old}}(o_i \mid q)} = 1 \\) and this reduces to standard REINFORCE.
+
+## Logged metrics
+
+While training and evaluating, we record the following reward metrics:
+
+- `num_tokens`: The total number of tokens processed so far, including both prompts and completions.
+- `completions/mean_length`: The average length of generated completions.
+- `completions/min_length`: The minimum length of generated completions.
+- `completions/max_length`: The maximum length of generated completions.
+- `completions/mean_terminated_length`: The average length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/min_terminated_length`: The minimum length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/max_terminated_length`: The maximum length of generated completions that terminate with EOS.
+- `completions/clipped_ratio`: The ratio of truncated (clipped) completions.
+- `reward/{reward_func_name}/mean`: The average reward from a specific reward function.
+- `reward/{reward_func_name}/std`: The standard deviation of the reward from a specific reward function.
+- `reward`: The overall average reward after applying reward weights.
+- `reward_std`: The standard deviation of rewards after applying reward weights. This is the average of the per-group standard deviations.
+- `frac_reward_zero_std`: The fraction of samples in the generation batch with a reward std of zero, implying there is little diversity for that prompt (all answers are correct or incorrect).
+- `entropy`: Average entropy of token predictions across generated completions. (If `mask_truncated_completions=True`, masked sequences tokens are excluded.)
+- `kl`: The average KL divergence between the model and the reference model, calculated over generated completions. Logged only if `beta` is nonzero.
+- `clip_ratio/region_mean`: The ratio of sequence probabilities where the RLOO objective is clipped to stay within the trust region:
+  $$
+  \text{clip}\left( r_{i}(\theta), 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}, 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high} \right)\,, \qquad r_{i}(\theta) = \frac{\pi_\theta(o_{i} \mid q)}{\pi_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(o_{i} \mid q)}\,.
+  $$
+
+    A higher value means more samples are clipped, which constrains how much the policy $\pi_\theta$ can change.
+- `clip_ratio/low_mean`: The average ratio of sequence probabilities that were clipped on the lower bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) < 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/low_min`: The minimum ratio of sequence probabilities that were clipped on the lower bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) < 1 - \epsilon_\mathrm{low}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/high_mean`: The average ratio of sequence probabilities that were clipped on the upper bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) > 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high}\\)
+- `clip_ratio/high_max`: The maximum ratio of sequence probabilities that were clipped on the upper bound of the trust region:  \\(r_{i,t}(\theta) > 1 + \epsilon_\mathrm{high}\\).
+
+## Customization
+
+### Speed up training with vLLM-powered generation
+
+Generation is often the main bottleneck when training with online methods. To accelerate generation, you can use [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm), a high-throughput, low-latency inference engine for LLMs. To enable it, first install the package with
+
+```shell
+pip install trl[vllm]
+```
+
+We support two ways of using vLLM during training: **server mode** and **colocate mode**.
+
+#### 🔌 Option 1: Server mode
+
+In this mode, vLLM runs in a separate process (and using separate GPUs) and communicates with the trainer via HTTP. This is ideal if you have dedicated GPUs for inference.
+
+1. **Start the vLLM server**:
+
+   ```bash
+   trl vllm-serve --model <model_name>
+   ```
+
+2. **Enable server mode in your training script**:
+
+   ```python
+   from trl import RLOOConfig
+
+   training_args = RLOOConfig(
+       ...,
+       use_vllm=True,
+       vllm_mode="server",  # default value, can be omitted
+   )
+   ```
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> Make sure that the server is using different GPUs than the trainer, otherwise you may run into NCCL errors. You can specify the GPUs to use with the `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` environment variable.
+
+#### 🧩 Option 2: Colocate mode
+
+In this mode, vLLM runs inside the trainer process and shares GPU memory with the training model. This avoids launching a separate server and can improve GPU utilization, but may lead to memory contention on the training GPUs.
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOConfig
+
+training_args = RLOOConfig(
+    ...,
+    use_vllm=True,
+    vllm_mode="colocate",
+)
+```
+
+> [!TIP]
+> Depending on the model size and the overall GPU memory requirements for training, you may need to adjust the `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` parameter in [`RLOOConfig`] to avoid underutilization or out-of-memory errors.
+>
+> We provide a [HF Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/trl-lib/recommend-vllm-memory) to help estimate the recommended GPU memory utilization based on your model configuration and experiment settings. Simply use it as follows to get `vllm_gpu_memory_utilization` recommendation:
+>
+> <iframe src="https://trl-lib-recommend-vllm-memory.hf.space" frameborder="0" width="850" height="450"></iframe>
+>
+> If the recommended value does not work in your environment, we suggest adding a small buffer (e.g., +0.05 or +0.1) to the recommended value to ensure stability.
+>
+> If you still find you are getting out-of-memory errors set `vllm_enable_sleep_mode` to True and the vllm parameters and cache will be offloaded during the optimization step. For more information, see [Reducing Memory Usage with vLLM Sleep Mode](reducing_memory_usage#vllm-sleep-mode).
+
+> [!TIP]
+> By default, RLOO uses `MASTER_ADDR=localhost` and `MASTER_PORT=12345` for vLLM, but you can override these values by setting the environment variables accordingly.
+
+For more information, see [Speeding up training with vLLM](speeding_up_training#vllm-for-fast-generation-in-online-methods).
+
+### RLOO at scale: train a 70B+ Model on multiple nodes
+
+When training large models like **Qwen2.5-72B**, you need several key optimizations to make the training efficient and scalable across multiple GPUs and nodes. These include:
+
+- **DeepSpeed ZeRO Stage 3**: ZeRO leverages data parallelism to distribute model states (weights, gradients, optimizer states) across multiple GPUs and CPUs, reducing memory and compute requirements on each device. Since large models cannot fit on a single GPU, using ZeRO Stage 3 is required for training such models. For more details, see [DeepSpeed Integration](deepspeed_integration).
+- **Accelerate**: Accelerate is a library that simplifies distributed training across multiple GPUs and nodes. It provides a simple API to launch distributed training and handles the complexities of distributed training, such as data parallelism, gradient accumulation, and distributed data loading. For more details, see [Distributing Training](distributing_training).
+- **vLLM**: See the previous section on how to use vLLM to speed up generation.
+
+Below is an example SLURM script to train a 70B model with RLOO on multiple nodes. This script trains a model on 4 nodes and uses the 5th node for vLLM-powered generation.
+
+```sh
+#!/bin/bash
+#SBATCH --nodes=5
+#SBATCH --gres=gpu:8
+
+# Get the list of allocated nodes
+NODELIST=($(scontrol show hostnames $SLURM_JOB_NODELIST))
+
+# Assign the first 4 nodes for training and the 5th node for vLLM
+TRAIN_NODES="${NODELIST[@]:0:4}"  # Nodes 0, 1, 2, 3 for training
+VLLM_NODE="${NODELIST[4]}"  # Node 4 for vLLM
+
+# Run training on the first 4 nodes (Group 1)
+srun --nodes=4 --ntasks=4 --nodelist="${NODELIST[@]:0:4}" accelerate launch \
+     --config_file examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
+     --num_processes 32 \
+     --num_machines 4 \
+     --main_process_ip ${NODELIST[0]} \
+     --machine_rank $SLURM_PROCID \
+     --rdzv_backend c10d \
+     train_rloo.py \
+     --server_ip $VLLM_NODE &
+
+# Run vLLM server on the 5th node (Group 2)
+srun --nodes=1 --ntasks=1 --nodelist="${NODELIST[4]}" trl vllm-serve --model Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B --tensor_parallel_size 8 &
+
+wait
+```
+
+```python
+import argparse
+
+from datasets import load_dataset
+from trl import RLOOTrainer, RLOOConfig
+
+def main():
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
+    parser.add_argument("--vllm_server_host", type=str, default="", help="The server IP")
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    # Example dataset from TLDR
+    dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train")
+
+    # Dummy reward function: count the number of unique characters in the completions
+    def reward_num_unique_chars(completions, **kwargs):
+        return [len(set(c)) for c in completions]
+
+    training_args = RLOOConfig(
+        output_dir="Qwen2.5-72B-RLOO",
+        per_device_train_batch_size=4,
+        bf16=True,
+        gradient_checkpointing=True,
+        use_vllm=True,
+        vllm_server_host=args.vllm_server_host.replace("ip-", "").replace("-", "."),  # from ip-X-X-X-X to X.X.X.X
+    )
+
+    trainer = RLOOTrainer(model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B", args=training_args, reward_funcs=reward_num_unique_chars, train_dataset=dataset)
+    trainer.train()
+
+if __name__=="__main__":
+    main()
+```
+
+### Using a custom reward function
+
+The [`RLOOTrainer`] supports using custom reward functions instead of dense reward models. To ensure compatibility, your reward function must satisfy the following requirements:
+
+1. **Input arguments**:
+   - The function must accept the following as keyword arguments:
+     - `prompts` (contains the prompts),
+     - `completions` (contains the generated completions),
+     - `completions_ids` (contains the tokenized completions),
+     - `trainer_state` ([`~transformers.TrainerState`]): The current state of the trainer. This can be used to implement dynamic reward functions, such as curriculum learning, where the reward is adjusted based on the training progress.
+     - All column names (but `prompt`) that the dataset may have. For example, if the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`, the function will be called with `ground_truth` as a keyword argument.
+
+     The easiest way to comply with this requirement is to use `**kwargs` in the function signature.
+   - Depending on the dataset format, the input will vary:
+     - For [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of strings.
+     - For [conversational format](dataset_formats#conversational), `prompts` and `completions` will be lists of message dictionaries.
+
+2. **Return value**: The function must return a list of floats. Each float represents the reward corresponding to a single completion.
+
+#### Example 1: Reward longer completions
+
+Below is an example of a reward function for a standard format that rewards longer completions:
+
+```python
+def reward_func(completions_ids, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that assigns higher scores to longer completions (in terms of token count)."""
+    return [float(len(ids)) for ids in completions_ids]
+```
+
+You can test it as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["The sky is", "The sun is"]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> completions = [" blue.", " in the sky."]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> completions_ids = [[6303, 13], [304, 279, 12884, 13]]
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, completions_ids=completions_ids)
+[2.0, 4.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 1.1: Reward longer completions (based on the number of characters)
+
+Same as the previous example, but this time the reward function is based on the number of characters instead of tokens.
+
+```python
+def reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that assigns higher scores to longer completions (in terms of character count)."""
+    return [float(len(completion)) for completion in completions]
+```
+
+You can test it as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["The sky is", "The sun is"]
+>>> completions = [" blue.", " in the sky."]
+>>> completions_ids = [[6303, 13], [304, 279, 12884, 13]]  # not used in the reward function, but the trainer will pass it
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, completions_ids=completions_ids)
+[6.0, 12.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 2: Reward completions with a specific format
+
+Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format. This example is inspired by the _format reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
+It is designed for a conversational format, where prompts and completions consist of structured messages.
+
+```python
+import re
+
+def format_reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
+    """Reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format."""
+    pattern = r"^<think>.*?</think><answer>.*?</answer>$"
+    completion_contents = [completion[0]["content"] for completion in completions]
+    matches = [re.match(pattern, content) for content in completion_contents]
+    return [1.0 if match else 0.0 for match in matches]
+```
+
+You can test this function as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = [
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "What is the result of (1 + 2) * 4?"}],
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "What is the result of (3 + 1) * 2?"}],
+... ]
+>>> completions = [
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "<think>The sum of 1 and 2 is 3, which we multiply by 4 to get 12.</think><answer>(1 + 2) * 4 = 12</answer>"}],
+...     [{"role": "assistant", "content": "The sum of 3 and 1 is 4, which we multiply by 2 to get 8. So (3 + 1) * 2 = 8."}],
+... ]
+>>> format_reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions)
+[1.0, 0.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 3: Reward completions based on a reference
+
+Below is an example of a reward function that checks if the completion is correct. This example is inspired by the _accuracy reward_ function used in the paper [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.12948).
+This example is designed for [standard format](dataset_formats#standard), where the dataset contains a column named `ground_truth`.
+
+```python
+import re
+
+def reward_func(completions, ground_truth, **kwargs):
+    # Regular expression to capture content inside \boxed{}
+    matches = [re.search(r"\\boxed\{(.*?)\}", completion) for completion in completions]
+    contents = [match.group(1) if match else "" for match in matches]
+    # Reward 1 if the content is the same as the ground truth, 0 otherwise
+    return [1.0 if c == gt else 0.0 for c, gt in zip(contents, ground_truth)]
+```
+
+You can test this function as follows:
+
+```python
+>>> prompts = ["Problem: Solve the equation $2x + 3 = 7$. Solution:", "Problem: Solve the equation $3x - 5 = 10$."]
+>>> completions = [r" The solution is \boxed{2}.", r" The solution is \boxed{6}."]
+>>> ground_truth = ["2", "5"]
+>>> reward_func(prompts=prompts, completions=completions, ground_truth=ground_truth)
+[1.0, 0.0]
+```
+
+#### Example 4: Multi-task reward functions
+
+Below is an example of using multiple reward functions in the [`RLOOTrainer`]. In this example, we define two task-specific reward functions: `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func`. The `math_reward_func` rewards math problems based on their correctness, while the `coding_reward_func` rewards coding problems based on whether the solution works.
+
+```python
+from datasets import Dataset
+from trl import RLOOTrainer
+
+# Define a dataset that contains both math and coding problems
+dataset = Dataset.from_list(
+    [
+        {"prompt": "What is 2+2?", "task": "math"},
+        {"prompt": "Write a function that returns the sum of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
+        {"prompt": "What is 3*4?", "task": "math"},
+        {"prompt": "Write a function that returns the product of two numbers.", "task": "code"},
+    ]
+)
+
+# Math-specific reward function
+def math_reward_func(prompts, completions, task, **kwargs):
+    rewards = []
+    for prompt, completion, t in zip(prompts, completions, task):
+        if t == "math":
+            # Calculate math-specific reward
+            correct = check_math_solution(prompt, completion)
+            reward = 1.0 if correct else -1.0
+            rewards.append(reward)
+        else:
+            # Return None for non-math tasks
+            rewards.append(None)
+    return rewards
+
+# Coding-specific reward function
+def coding_reward_func(prompts, completions, task, **kwargs):
+    rewards = []
+    for prompt, completion, t in zip(prompts, completions, task):
+        if t == "coding":
+            # Calculate coding-specific reward
+            works = test_code_solution(prompt, completion)
+            reward = 1.0 if works else -1.0
+            rewards.append(reward)
+        else:
+            # Return None for non-coding tasks
+            rewards.append(None)
+    return rewards
+
+# Use both task-specific reward functions
+trainer = RLOOTrainer(
+    model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
+    reward_funcs=[math_reward_func, coding_reward_func],
+    train_dataset=dataset,
+)
+
+trainer.train()
+```
+
+In this example, the `math_reward_func` and `coding_reward_func` are designed to work with a mixed dataset that contains both math and coding problems. The `task` column in the dataset is used to determine which reward function to apply to each problem. If there is no relevant reward function for a sample in the dataset, the reward function will return `None`, and the [`RLOOTrainer`] will continue with the valid functions and tasks. This allows the [`RLOOTrainer`] to handle multiple reward functions with different applicability.
+
+Note that the [`RLOOTrainer`] will ignore the `None` rewards returned by the reward functions and only consider the rewards returned by the relevant functions. This ensures that the model is trained on the relevant tasks and ignores the tasks for which there is no relevant reward function.
+
+#### Passing the reward function to the trainer
+
+To use your custom reward function, pass it to the [`RLOOTrainer`] as follows:
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOTrainer
+
+trainer = RLOOTrainer(
+    reward_funcs=reward_func,
+    ...,
+)
+```
+
+If you have multiple reward functions, you can pass them as a list:
+
+```python
+from trl import RLOOTrainer
+
+trainer = RLOOTrainer(
+    reward_funcs=[reward_func1, reward_func2],
+    ...,
+)
+```
+
+and the reward will be computed as the sum of the rewards from each function, or the weighted sum if `reward_weights` is provided in the config.
+
+Note that [`RLOOTrainer`] supports multiple reward functions of different types. See the parameters documentation for more details.
+
+## Vision-Language Model (VLM) Training
+
+RLOO supports training Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on multimodal datasets containing both text and images.
+
+### Supported Models
+
+Tested with:
+
+- **Gemma3** — e.g., `google/gemma-3-4b-it`
+- **LLaVA-NeXT** — e.g., `llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf`
+- **Qwen2-VL** — e.g., `Qwen/Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct`
+- **Qwen2.5-VL** — e.g., `Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct`
+- **SmolVLM2** — e.g., `HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM2-2.2B-Instruct`
+  
+> [!TIP]
+> Compatibility with all VLMs is not guaranteed. If you believe a model should be supported, feel free to open an issue on GitHub — or better yet, submit a pull request with the required changes.
+
+### Quick Start
+
+Use [rloo\_vlm.py](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/rloo_vlm.py) to fine-tune a VLM. Example command for training on [`lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmms-lab/multimodal-open-r1-8k-verified):
+
+```bash
+accelerate launch \
+  --config_file=examples/accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
+  examples/scripts/rloo_vlm.py \
+  --model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct \
+  --output_dir rloo-Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct \
+  --learning_rate 1e-5 \
+  --gradient_checkpointing \
+  --dtype bfloat16 \
+  --max_prompt_length 2048 \
+  --max_completion_length 1024 \
+  --use_vllm \
+  --vllm_mode colocate \
+  --use_peft \
+  --lora_target_modules "q_proj", "v_proj" \
+  --log_completions
+```
+
+### Configuration Tips
+
+> [!WARNING]
+> VLM training may fail if image tokens are truncated. We highly recommend disabling truncation by setting `max_prompt_length` to `None`.
+
+- Use LoRA on vision-language projection layers
+- Enable 4-bit quantization to reduce memory usage
+- VLMs are memory-intensive — start with smaller batch sizes
+- Most models are compatible with vLLM (`server` and `colocate` modes)
+
+### Dataset Format
+
+Each training sample should include:
+
+- `prompt`: Text formatted via the processor's chat template
+- `image`/`images`: PIL Image or list of PIL Images
+
+The trainer automatically handles image-to-tensor conversion via the model’s image processor.
+
+## RLOOTrainer
+
+[[autodoc]] RLOOTrainer
+    - train
+    - save_model
+    - push_to_hub
+
+## RLOOConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] RLOOConfig
+
+## References
+
+1. [RLOO Paper](https://openreview.net/pdf?id=r1lgTGL5DE)
+2. [Paper Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.14740)
+3. [Paper - REINFORCE++: A Simple and Efficient Approach for Aligning Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2501.03262)
+4. [Blog Post - Putting RL back in RLHF](https://huggingface.co/blog/putting_rl_back_in_rlhf_with_rloo)
+5. [Blog Post - Unraveling RLHF and Its Variants: Progress and Practical Engineering Insights](https://hijkzzz.notion.site/unraveling-rlhf-and-its-variants-engineering-insights#147d9a33ecc9806090f3d5c749d31f05)
+6. [Youtube - RLOO: A Cost-Efficient Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86asXGPK6RU&ab_channel=BuzzRobot)
+
+## Migration Guide from the old implementation (0.21 and below)
+
+With the release of version 0.22.0, we have revamped the [`RLOOTrainer`] to be more aligned with other online trainers in the library, like [`GRPOTrainer`]. This new implementation introduces several changes to the configuration parameters and overall structure of the trainer.
+Below is a summary of the key changes for [`RLOOConfig`]:
+
+| TRL ≤ 0.21.x | TRL ≥ 0.22.0 |
+| --- | --- |
+| `rloo_k` | renamed to `num_generations` |
+| `cliprange` | renamed to `epsilon` |
+| `kl_coef` | renamed to `beta` |
+| `exp_name` | renamed to `run_name`. Use `run_name = f"{exp_name}__{seed}__{int(time.time())}"` to replicate old behavior |
+| `normalize_reward` | renamed to `normalize_advantages`. Note: this always normalized advantages (despite the old name) |
+| `num_ppo_epochs` | renamed to `num_iterations` (default: `1`) |
+| `token_level_kl` | **removed** – KL is now computed only at the sequence level |
+| `dataset_num_proc` | **removed** – it was unused |
+| `num_mini_batches` | renamed to `steps_per_generation` |
+| `total_episodes` | use `max_steps=total_episodes / gradient_accumulation_steps` instead |
+| `local_rollout_forward_batch_size` | **removed** – now automatically set to `per_device_train_batch_size` (or `per_device_eval_batch_size` during evaluation) |
+| `num_sample_generations` | **removed** – use `logging_steps` to control generation logging frequency |
+| `response_length` | renamed to `max_completion_length` (default: `256`) |
+| `stop_token` | **removed** |
+| `stop_token_id` | **removed** – use `processing_class.eos_token_id` instead |
+| `missing_eos_penalty` | **removed** – replicate with a custom reward function checking if `eos_token_id` is in `completion_ids` |
+
+Below is a summary of the key changes for [`RLOOTrainer`]:
+
+| TRL ≤ 0.21.x | TRL ≥ 0.22.0 |
+| --- | --- |
+| `config` | renamed to `args` |
+| `reward_model` | renamed to `reward_funcs`, which now supports both reward models and custom reward functions |
+| `policy` | renamed to `model` |
+| `ref_policy` | **removed** – the reference model is now created automatically from `model` |
+| `data_collator` | **removed** |

docs/source/script_utils.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Scripts Utilities
+
+## ScriptArguments
+
+[[autodoc]] ScriptArguments
+
+## TrlParser
+
+[[autodoc]] TrlParser
+    - parse_args_and_config
+    - parse_args_into_dataclasses
+    - set_defaults_with_config
+
+## get_dataset
+
+[[autodoc]] get_dataset
+
+## DatasetConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] scripts.utils.DatasetConfig
+
+## DatasetMixtureConfig
+
+[[autodoc]] DatasetMixtureConfig

docs/source/sentiment_tuning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Sentiment Tuning Examples
+
+The notebooks and scripts in these examples show how to fine-tune a model with a sentiment classifier (such as `lvwerra/distilbert-imdb`).
+
+Here's an overview of the notebooks and scripts in the [trl repository](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples):
+
+| File | Description |
+| --- |--- |
+| [`examples/scripts/ppo.py`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/scripts/ppo.py)  [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/sentiment/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) | This script shows how to use the `PPOTrainer` to fine-tune a sentiment analysis model using IMDB dataset |
+| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 imdb sentiment tuning example on a jupyter notebook. |
+| [`examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb`](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-control.ipynb)   [![Open In Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/sentiment/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment-control.ipynb) | This notebook demonstrates how to reproduce the GPT2 sentiment control example on a jupyter notebook. |
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# 1. run directly
+python examples/scripts/ppo.py
+# 2. run via `accelerate` (recommended), enabling more features (e.g., multiple GPUs, deepspeed)
+accelerate config # will prompt you to define the training configuration
+accelerate launch examples/scripts/ppo.py # launches training
+# 3. get help text and documentation
+python examples/scripts/ppo.py --help
+# 4. configure logging with wandb and, say, mini_batch_size=1 and gradient_accumulation_steps=16
+python examples/scripts/ppo.py --log_with wandb --mini_batch_size 1 --gradient_accumulation_steps 16
+```
+
+Note: if you don't want to log with `wandb` remove `log_with="wandb"` in the scripts/notebooks. You can also replace it with your favourite experiment tracker that's [supported by `accelerate`](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/usage_guides/tracking).
+
+## Few notes on multi-GPU
+
+To run in multi-GPU setup with DDP (distributed Data Parallel) change the `device_map` value to `device_map={"": Accelerator().process_index}` and make sure to run your script with `accelerate launch yourscript.py`. If you want to apply naive pipeline parallelism you can use `device_map="auto"`.