mirror of
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch.git
synced 2025-11-18 09:34:57 +08:00
Initial prototype for dynamic int inputs, allows users to run with `torch.compile(f)(DynamicInt(4))`, compiling dynamically and using the underlying hint at runtime.
Current behavior:
- Also works in eager (mostly by subclassing int), as scalar input to torch functions, or numpy/math/etc. For example, `x = DynamicInt(3); torch.randn(x); torch.add(y, z, alpha=x); np.arange(x)` all act as if x = 3.
- Behavior for arithmetic ops is to return new DynamicInts rather than static ints; `DynamicInt(3) * 2 = DynamicInt(6)`. This is via SymNode magic methods, but coverage might not be 100% - for example, I had to explicitly override floordiv to avoid int casting. This is not necessarily the case for non-magic method ops (e.g. `math.cos(x)`). The alternative here is to int cast on all operations, but I opted for this for dynamism propagation in non-compiled regions.
- Doesn't ban fullgraph=False; DynamicInt objects might be leaked back to the user, but I guess this is fine, because they can be casted to ints when needed?
- Dynamo only allocates one symbol per DynamicInt; specifying the same DynamicInt for multiple inputs leads to input deduplication, and a guard installed.
- We don't raise on int specialization (in allowlist/maybe_mark_dynamic style) - but an easy change if needed.
- DynamicInts as nn.Module attributes are handled.
- We don't guard on the DynamicInt id, e.g. users can do the following without recompiling (maybe we should guard?)
```python
x = DynamicInt(4)
f(x)
f(1)
f(DynamicInt(3)) # same as f(3)
```
Follow-up work:
- Specifying shape constraints, either at the int-level, e.g.
```python
DynamicInt(64, name="s0", constraints=["s0 % 32 == 0", "s0 <= 1024"]
```
or at the compilation level, e.g. something like
```python
s0 = DynamicInt(64, name="s0")
s1 = DynamicInt(128, name="s1")
with some_compiler_config.dynamic_int_constraints(["s1 == 2*s0", "s0 % 32 == 0"]):
f(s0, s1)
```
This should subsume the need for specifying derived SymInts?
- SymFloat support - currently it seems backed floats are specialized by the tensorify float pass, and there's no handling in inductor.
- Propagating dynamism in tensor constructors, e.g. `x = DynamicInt(4); torch.randn(x)` could annotate `_dynamo_dynamic_indices`.
Differential Revision: D81698719
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162194
Approved by: https://github.com/bobrenjc93
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
.. currentmodule:: torch.fx.experimental
torch.fx.experimental
:::{warning} These APIs are experimental and subject to change without notice. :::
.. autoclass:: torch.fx.experimental.sym_node.DynamicInt
torch.fx.experimental.symbolic_shapes
.. currentmodule:: torch.fx.experimental.symbolic_shapes
.. automodule:: torch.fx.experimental.symbolic_shapes
.. autosummary::
:toctree: generated
:nosignatures:
ShapeEnv
DimDynamic
StrictMinMaxConstraint
RelaxedUnspecConstraint
EqualityConstraint
SymbolicContext
StatelessSymbolicContext
StatefulSymbolicContext
SubclassSymbolicContext
DimConstraints
ShapeEnvSettings
ConvertIntKey
CallMethodKey
PropagateUnbackedSymInts
DivideByKey
InnerTensorKey
Specialization
hint_int
is_concrete_int
is_concrete_bool
is_concrete_float
has_free_symbols
has_free_unbacked_symbols
guard_or_true
guard_or_false
guard_size_oblivious
sym_and
sym_eq
sym_or
constrain_range
constrain_unify
canonicalize_bool_expr
statically_known_true
statically_known_false
has_static_value
lru_cache
check_consistent
compute_unbacked_bindings
rebind_unbacked
resolve_unbacked_bindings
is_accessor_node
torch.fx.experimental.proxy_tensor
.. currentmodule:: torch.fx.experimental.proxy_tensor
.. automodule:: torch.fx.experimental.proxy_tensor
.. autosummary::
:toctree: generated
:nosignatures:
make_fx
handle_sym_dispatch
get_proxy_mode
maybe_enable_thunkify
maybe_disable_thunkify