Initial prototype for dynamic int inputs, allows users to run with `torch.compile(f)(DynamicInt(4))`, compiling dynamically and using the underlying hint at runtime.
Current behavior:
- Also works in eager (mostly by subclassing int), as scalar input to torch functions, or numpy/math/etc. For example, `x = DynamicInt(3); torch.randn(x); torch.add(y, z, alpha=x); np.arange(x)` all act as if x = 3.
- Behavior for arithmetic ops is to return new DynamicInts rather than static ints; `DynamicInt(3) * 2 = DynamicInt(6)`. This is via SymNode magic methods, but coverage might not be 100% - for example, I had to explicitly override floordiv to avoid int casting. This is not necessarily the case for non-magic method ops (e.g. `math.cos(x)`). The alternative here is to int cast on all operations, but I opted for this for dynamism propagation in non-compiled regions.
- Doesn't ban fullgraph=False; DynamicInt objects might be leaked back to the user, but I guess this is fine, because they can be casted to ints when needed?
- Dynamo only allocates one symbol per DynamicInt; specifying the same DynamicInt for multiple inputs leads to input deduplication, and a guard installed.
- We don't raise on int specialization (in allowlist/maybe_mark_dynamic style) - but an easy change if needed.
- DynamicInts as nn.Module attributes are handled.
- We don't guard on the DynamicInt id, e.g. users can do the following without recompiling (maybe we should guard?)
```python
x = DynamicInt(4)
f(x)
f(1)
f(DynamicInt(3)) # same as f(3)
```
Follow-up work:
- Specifying shape constraints, either at the int-level, e.g.
```python
DynamicInt(64, name="s0", constraints=["s0 % 32 == 0", "s0 <= 1024"]
```
or at the compilation level, e.g. something like
```python
s0 = DynamicInt(64, name="s0")
s1 = DynamicInt(128, name="s1")
with some_compiler_config.dynamic_int_constraints(["s1 == 2*s0", "s0 % 32 == 0"]):
f(s0, s1)
```
This should subsume the need for specifying derived SymInts?
- SymFloat support - currently it seems backed floats are specialized by the tensorify float pass, and there's no handling in inductor.
- Propagating dynamism in tensor constructors, e.g. `x = DynamicInt(4); torch.randn(x)` could annotate `_dynamo_dynamic_indices`.
Differential Revision: D81698719
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162194
Approved by: https://github.com/bobrenjc93
As part of better engineering week, we would like to improve out type support to improve dev experience in dynamo
This PR adds strict typing support to a critical set of files for dynamo, `source.py` and the base `_guards.py`
Running
```
mypy torch/_dynamo/source.py torch/_guards.py --linecount-report /tmp/coverage_log
```
| -------- | Lines Unannotated | Lines Total | % lines covered | Funcs Unannotated | Funcs Total | % funcs covered |
| -------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- |
| Main | 1227 | 2208 | 55.57% | 207 | 362 | 57.18% |
| This PR | 2217 | 2217 | 100.00% | 362 | 362 | 100.00% |
| Delta | +990 | +9 | +44.43% | +155 | 0 | +42.82% |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/158397
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
vLLM profiler sets with_stack=True that shows the dict_getitem on the profiler, both inflating the numbers and confusing compile users. This PR keeps BINARY_SUBSCR for regular dicts, while using `dict.__getitem__` only for dict subclasses.
Using binary_subscr is little bit faster, but not enough to make any major latency improvements.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/155727
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519, https://github.com/StrongerXi, https://github.com/jansel
Summary: Prune unused local objects from serialized local scope if they are not used in guard reconstruction. This is helpful when a user program takes things like local callable functions or the function call is recursive.
Test Plan:
test/dynamo/test_guard_serialization.py -k test_function_locals
Before pruning locals:
```
state = GuardsState(output_graph=OutputGraphGuardsState(local_scope={'x': tensor([ 0.0461, 0.4024, -1.0115]), 'g': <function ...aints=None, _guards=<torch._guards.GuardsSet object at 0x7fbccc7e9fc0>, _aotautograd_guards=[]), shape_code_parts=None)
def pickle_guards_state(state: GuardsState) -> bytes:
buf = io.BytesIO()
pickler = GuardsStatePickler(buf)
try:
pickler.dump(state)
except AttributeError as e:
> raise torch._dynamo.exc.PackageError(str(e)) from e
E torch._dynamo.exc.PackageError: Can't pickle local object 'TestGuardSerialization.test_function_locals.<locals>.foo'
```
After the diff
```
Tests finished: Pass 1. Fail 0. Fatal 0. Skip 0. Build failure 0
```
Differential Revision: D75452123
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154431
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This is a proof-of-concept of how we could serialize a guard and deserialize it back from the bytes.
The main behavioral change introduced in this diff is on CheckFunctionManager:
```
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph, guards_serialization_mode="save")
guards_state: bytes = check_fn_manager.guards_state
```
Once `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `save`, CheckFunctionManager will return an addtional `bytes` object called `guards_state` which should contain all the information needed for deserializing guards later.
When we load back guards state, we will set `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `load`:
```
output_graph_state = pickle.loads(guards_state)
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph_state, guards_serialization_mode="load")
```
# TENSOR_MATCH
Since we have many types of guards to support, we will break the work into small diffs instead of a single diff to support every guards.
We kick off the work from TENSOR_MATCH from this diff.
# Testing
For each type of guard we will test it like the following:
1. Use guard_filter_fn to select 1 type of guard each time.
2. Call InstructionTranslator directly on an example function to get OutputGraph and CheckFunctionManager (reference guard manager)
3. Serialize->deserialize the output graph state and re-build the guards with a new CheckFunctionManager (loaded guard manager)
4. Throw a set of example inputs to both reference and loaded guard manager to see if their behavior match.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151318
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/anijain2305
This is a proof-of-concept of how we could serialize a guard and deserialize it back from the bytes.
The main behavioral change introduced in this diff is on CheckFunctionManager:
```
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph, guards_serialization_mode="save")
guards_state: bytes = check_fn_manager.guards_state
```
Once `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `save`, CheckFunctionManager will return an addtional `bytes` object called `guards_state` which should contain all the information needed for deserializing guards later.
When we load back guards state, we will set `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `load`:
```
output_graph_state = pickle.loads(guards_state)
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph_state, guards_serialization_mode="load")
```
# TENSOR_MATCH
Since we have many types of guards to support, we will break the work into small diffs instead of a single diff to support every guards.
We kick off the work from TENSOR_MATCH from this diff.
# Testing
For each type of guard we will test it like the following:
1. Use guard_filter_fn to select 1 type of guard each time.
2. Call InstructionTranslator directly on an example function to get OutputGraph and CheckFunctionManager (reference guard manager)
3. Serialize->deserialize the output graph state and re-build the guards with a new CheckFunctionManager (loaded guard manager)
4. Throw a set of example inputs to both reference and loaded guard manager to see if their behavior match.
Differential Revision: [D72987485](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72987485/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151318
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/anijain2305
This patch effectively ignores traceable_tensor_subclasses, allowing
Dynamo to always try tracing into the `__torch_function__` of tensor
subclass. This helps us with 2 things:
1. allowing users to directly benefit from better compilation of tensor
subclass, by just upgrading pytorch, without having to change legacy
library code (see earlier patches in the stack for examples).
2. potentially exposing more issues in compiling tensor subclass, so we
can get signals and improve them.
As a consequence, it exposed and fixes 2 subtle bugs:
1. In `build_torch_function_fn`, we could get
`torch._C._disabled_torch_function_impl` because we have a
`Parameter` subclass without `__torch_function__` override or if we
have a tensor subclass with `__torch_dispatch__` override. We graph
break on this for now, and plan to add support -- the logic for
simulating `torch._C._disabled_torch_function_impl` is already in
`SuperVariable`, we just need to reuse it.
2. Sometimes we create `SyntheticLocalSource` and need to remove all the
guards installed on it, but we only removed the ones whose source
_is_ the created synthetic source `s`, but forgot about chained
source like `s.foo`, this showed up as
`SYNTHETIC_LOCAL['tmp_0'].__torch_function__.__func__`.
Differential Revision: [D71906141](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71906141)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149792
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/mlazos
ghstack dependencies: #149482, #149483, #149484
This patch effectively ignores traceable_tensor_subclasses, allowing
Dynamo to always try tracing into the `__torch_function__` of tensor
subclass. This helps us with 2 things:
1. allowing users to directly benefit from better compilation of tensor
subclass, by just upgrading pytorch, without having to change legacy
library code (see earlier patches in the stack for examples).
2. potentially exposing more issues in compiling tensor subclass, so we
can get signals and improve them.
As a consequence, it exposed and fixes 2 subtle bugs:
1. In `build_torch_function_fn`, we could get
`torch._C._disabled_torch_function_impl` because we have a
`Parameter` subclass without `__torch_function__` override or if we
have a tensor subclass with `__torch_dispatch__` override. We graph
break on this for now, and plan to add support -- the logic for
simulating `torch._C._disabled_torch_function_impl` is already in
`SuperVariable`, we just need to reuse it.
2. Sometimes we create `SyntheticLocalSource` and need to remove all the
guards installed on it, but we only removed the ones whose source
_is_ the created synthetic source `s`, but forgot about chained
source like `s.foo`, this showed up as
`SYNTHETIC_LOCAL['tmp_0'].__torch_function__.__func__`.
Differential Revision: [D71906141](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71906141)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149792
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/mlazos
ghstack dependencies: #149482, #149483, #149484
Recently I've been experimenting with introducing new APIs to delay compile as a way to reduce compile times while improving the ergonomics of using dynamic shapes. The high level idea is to run the first invocation of compile in eager, save the example inputs, and on the second invocation we can derive the dynamism in the inputs so that we don't need to waste our time doing a compile with static shapes (which is the status quo today with automatic dynamic).
Another benefit of this is most users no longer need to annotate their inputs with mark_dynamic and mark_unbaked calls since we can derive the dynamism on the very first call. Additionally we get dynamic ints out of the box in this new regime.
This PR implements this idea through the set_stance APIs. In particular it introduces a new `eager_then_compile` stance.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147983
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
This PR adds support for list subclasses. Among other things are
1) Tracking the mutations on internal vts like `_dict_vt` and `_list_vt` using sources. This helps identify if there was a mutation in the underlying data structures, and we need to reconstruct it.
2) `UserDefinedObjectVariable` now has a new method - `is_modified` which `side_effect` infra relies upon to check mutations in the underlying vts (like `_dict_vt`).
3) `reconstruction` logic ensures that we use `dict.__getitem__` and `list.__getitem__` methods. This is super important because we don't want to call the overridden `__getitem__` methods.
If this PR is hard to review, please let me know. I can break it into several small PRs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146819
Approved by: https://github.com/StrongerXi, https://github.com/jansel
In hinsight, we never needed a DICT_SUBCLASS_GUARD_MANAGER, because Dynamo would inline through the overridden keys method. In this PR, we ensure that while creating guards and constructing variable trackers, we get the `d.keys()` value by using `dict.keys(d)`. This ensures that we do not call overridden keys method. Therefore, the C++ guard can use `PyDict_Next` directly to check the guards.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143722
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
In hinsight, we never needed a DICT_SUBCLASS_GUARD_MANAGER, because Dynamo would inline through the overridden keys method. In this PR, we ensure that while creating guards and constructing variable trackers, we get the `d.keys()` value by using `dict.keys(d)`. This ensures that we do not call overridden keys method. Therefore, the C++ guard can use `PyDict_Next` directly to check the guards.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143722
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This patch
1. removes `AutoDerefLocalSource` in favor of `LocalSource`, thereby
removing its special handling in guards.
2. introduces a `LocalCellSource` for cells from the root frame, with
only `reconstruct` implemented, to programmatically enforce that thse
cells should never be used by other components like guards.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141629
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #141628
Prior to this patch, we are using `ConstantVariable.create` to create VT
for frozenset objects, and intended yet failed to predicate that on all
itmes being literals (see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140984#discussion_r1847393736).
The code was from https://github.com/pytorch/torchdynamo/commit/7c03434 and
the original goal was to help DBR quantization, but as the new test in
this patch shows, it could lead to silent incorrectness.
Upon a closer look, this exposes some subtleties in how Dynamo handles
`ConstantVariable` and `LOAD_CONST`, so this patch both fixes the
aforementioned issue and documents, enforces, and makes explicit the
invariants around `ConstantVariable` and `LOAD_CONST` -- only immutable
objects are supported.
Specifically, this patch:
1. refine the checks for wrapping a `frozenset` object, document why we
can't just wrap its items directly due to lack of `Sourcec` for set
items, and use a safe workaround (`SourcelessBuilder`) to ensure
soundness while keeping the DBR quantization support.
2. Adds more types to `common_constant_types`, thereby making
`ConstantVariable.is_base_literal` more lenient, and strictly checks
this property in the constructor of `ConstantVariable`.
3. Change relevant uses of `create_instruction("LOAD_CONST", ...)` to
`create_load_const` which checks `is_safe_constant`, and makes
developer overrides explicit by using `create_load_const_unchecked`
when needed.
4. In a few places, use more specific `VariableTracker`, e.g.,
`TypingVariable` rather than `ConstantVariable`, and
`FrozensetVariable` rather than `SetVariable`.
(2) and (3) are mainly to future-proof Dynamo against bugs like (1).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141504
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
In addition to `NewCellVariable`, Dynamo has 3 ways of modeling cell objects:
1. For cells captured and created by the root frame, represent them as
their contents in `root_tx.symbolic_locals`, which `LOAD_DEREF` and
`STORE_DEREF` update directly, without going through `SideEffects`.
2. `ClosureVariable`: this is created when cells from (1) are captured
by a newly created function Dynamo is about to inline. It's a handle
with a name that redirects `LOAD_DEREF` and `STORE_DEREF` back (1),
to make `root_tx.symbolic_locals` up-to-date.
3. For cells that are captured by both the root frame and some
pre-existing function Dynamo is about to inline, represent those
cells as contents, and do not allow writes to them.
Note that (2) and (3) are mainly to conform with (1) -- to make sure
Dynamo has a consistent modeling of cells for the same cell objects.
In this patch, we represent all of these cells as `NewCellVariable`. The
main new code paths introduced are:
- using `NewCellVariable` to model cell objects created by the root
frame (the cells are passed in as input to `InstructionTranslator`),
this is what allows us to get rid of all 3 legacy paths above.
- adding a new `AutoDerefLocalSource` to deal with the python-code
level (guards) and bytecode level (codegen) auto-dereferencing
behavior, when accessing pre-existing python cells. This also
involves a tiny update to guard manager generation.
- plumbing some extra info into `LocalSource` and `CellVariable` so that
we can still emit `LOAD_DEREF`, `STORE_DEREF`, `LOAD_CLOSURE` (instead
of `make_cell`, `cell_contents` attribute access, and `LOAD_FAST`),
which is important for readability, performance, and some
assumptions `bytecode_transformation.py` makes.
As a result, this patch removes a lot of the now-dead code paths and
TODOs. Notably, it significantly simplified the `prune_dead_locals`
function, which was duplicating a lot of the logic from
`prune_dead_object_new`; this conveniently closes#137123.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140153
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #140330, #140152, #140436, #140435
The `cell_or_freevar` was added in #106403 to help us ensure
Dynamo-export only allows graph input that depends on the frame input
(rather than a captured cell, for instance).
However, when taken literally, the `cell_or_freevar` condition is
actually not accurate, because for frame inputs that are also cells
(i.e., captured by some inner function), we actually set the
`cell_or_freevar` flag to false. This makes sense, because otherwise the
existing implementation would prevent Dynamo-export to add any of these
inputs to the graph.
To help with reasoning, this patch refines the `cell_or_freevar` flag to
what we really want to check -- `is_input`, and updates the relevant use
sites.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140151
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #140035, #140036, #140149, #140150
