Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70326
See D24145988 for context: it allows loops such as for(int i=0;i<10;i++) to be expressed as for(const auto i : c10::irange(10)). This is nice because it auto-types the loops and adds const-safety to the iteration variable.
Test Plan: buck run //caffe2/torch/fb/sparsenn:test
Reviewed By: r-barnes
Differential Revision: D33243400
fbshipit-source-id: b1f1b4163f4bf662031baea9e5268459b40c69a3
Summary:
This is an automatic change generated by the following script:
```
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from subprocess import check_output, check_call
import os
def get_compiled_files_list():
import json
with open("build/compile_commands.json") as f:
data = json.load(f)
files = [os.path.relpath(node['file']) for node in data]
for idx, fname in enumerate(files):
if fname.startswith('build/') and fname.endswith('.DEFAULT.cpp'):
files[idx] = fname[len('build/'):-len('.DEFAULT.cpp')]
return files
def run_clang_tidy(fname):
check_call(["python3", "tools/clang_tidy.py", "-c", "build", "-x", fname,"-s"])
changes = check_output(["git", "ls-files", "-m"])
if len(changes) == 0:
return
check_call(["git", "commit","--all", "-m", f"NOLINT stubs for {fname}"])
def main():
git_files = check_output(["git", "ls-files"]).decode("ascii").split("\n")
compiled_files = get_compiled_files_list()
for idx, fname in enumerate(git_files):
if fname not in compiled_files:
continue
if fname.startswith("caffe2/contrib/aten/"):
continue
print(f"[{idx}/{len(git_files)}] Processing {fname}")
run_clang_tidy(fname)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56892
Reviewed By: H-Huang
Differential Revision: D27991944
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 5415e1eb2c1b34319a4f03024bfaa087007d7179
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/26339
Serializes per-channel tensor in both torch.serialization and jit. Since we didn't bind Quantizer properly yet, I chose to save a tuple representing quantizer settings. To avoid recursive tensor serialization calls, I'm using tuple instead of tensor to store scales and zero points.
driazati - please check the serialization logic. Is there a good test that compares that JIT serialization and python serialization are equivalent? (I haven't tested it yet)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D17443222
Pulled By: dzhulgakov
fbshipit-source-id: a34758de1ffd2ec1cdc5355f5baf95284a4ccf4b
