This PR enables all PIE rules on ruff, there are already some enabled rules from this family, the new added rules are
```
PIE796 Enum contains duplicate value: {value}
PIE808 Unnecessary start argument in range
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165814
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR enables all PIE rules on ruff, there are already some enabled rules from this family, the new added rules are
```
PIE796 Enum contains duplicate value: {value}
PIE808 Unnecessary start argument in range
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165814
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
In practice `bool(...)` is either constant folded by Dynamo or used for
branching (so most of its emulation logic lived in
`InstructionTranslator.generic_jump`.
This patch adds a dedicated `bool` hanlder (only for symbolic
bool/int/float for now), and fixes#136075.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/155863
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
Previously specialization error messages would render sources that were pretty far from source-code names. E.g., given args named `x, y, zs`, the source for `y.size()[0]` would be rendered as `args[0][1].size()[0]`.
This is because we created artificial local names following `(args, kwargs)` structure instead of reusing signatures. This PR fixes that situation.
Basically we map prefixes of key paths that correspond to original arg names to root sources corresponding to those names; the rest of the key paths hang from these root sources.
Differential Revision: [D76461391](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76461391/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/155738
Approved by: https://github.com/bobrenjc93
Basically adds native _IntWrapper support to dynamo. Here's my process of trying to make symint input support work on dynamo, and how I ended up with this approach [(doc)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GvNRQd8BnxlMay_hrEVgEta6VUeUW_hcFeRuB7q1nDY/edit?tab=t.0).
What I did was, before passing inputs to dynamo.export, I first wrap them with a class, `_IntWrapper`. When processing dynamic shapes, I will then add the corresponding dynamic shape specification to the `dynamism` field stored on the `_IntWrapper`. If there is no dynamism specified, then this will get unwrapped back to an integer. When dynamo tracing, when we encounter an `_IntWrapper`, we will convert this to a symint if the dynamism was specified as `Dim.DYNAMIC/AUTO`. Dynamo will then trace a graph that contains symint inputs, which will get passed to AOTAutograd and so on.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152677
Approved by: https://github.com/pianpwk
This PR was inspired by internal models that were cache missing due to PGO. At a high level the problem looks as follows
Run 1, Invocation 1: We do static compile, save some example values in PGO/automatic dynamic
Run 1, Invocation 2: We detect varying inputs, do dynamic compile, get a dynamic graph and save to PGO. Crucially what we save to PGO is actually a superset of what is actually dynamic. If we notice an input was varying, we mark it as dynamic in PGO even if later on that value gets specialized. When a value gets specialized, we actually remove the symbol from the graph. This results in an interesting conundrum where although we are producing the same isomorphic graph, PGO makes the second run cache miss. Let's see how....
Run 2, Invocation 1: We fetch the PGO, over-mark things as dynamic, get a fx graph, look it up in the cache and... whoops! cache miss! This is because of the aforementioned behavior where the PGO profile will cause us to over-allocate symbols. In practice this means we end up saving a graph in cache with symbols x:s1, y:s3 and on second attempt we cache miss with x:s1, y:s6 where symbols s3,s4,s5 were all optimistically marked dynamic by PGO and subsequently specialized.
We solve this problem by hashing the source names. This ensures somewhat stable assignment. To prevent catastrophic symbol collisions, we use linear probing to ensure no collisions.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149665
Approved by: https://github.com/Mingming-Ding, https://github.com/laithsakka
This PR was inspired by internal models that were cache missing due to PGO. At a high level the problem looks as follows
Run 1, Invocation 1: We do static compile, save some example values in PGO/automatic dynamic
Run 1, Invocation 2: We detect varying inputs, do dynamic compile, get a dynamic graph and save to PGO. Crucially what we save to PGO is actually a superset of what is actually dynamic. If we notice an input was varying, we mark it as dynamic in PGO even if later on that value gets specialized. When a value gets specialized, we actually remove the symbol from the graph. This results in an interesting conundrum where although we are producing the same isomorphic graph, PGO makes the second run cache miss. Let's see how....
Run 2, Invocation 1: We fetch the PGO, over-mark things as dynamic, get a fx graph, look it up in the cache and... whoops! cache miss! This is because of the aforementioned behavior where the PGO profile will cause us to over-allocate symbols. In practice this means we end up saving a graph in cache with symbols x:s1, y:s3 and on second attempt we cache miss with x:s1, y:s6 where symbols s3,s4,s5 were all optimistically marked dynamic by PGO and subsequently specialized.
We solve this problem by hashing the source names. This ensures somewhat stable assignment. To prevent catastrophic symbol collisions, we use linear probing to ensure no collisions.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149665
Approved by: https://github.com/Mingming-Ding, https://github.com/laithsakka
