Summary:
Clearly expressing a type is inferred by PyTorch instead of explicitly annotated by user makes many error messages more user-friendly
Currently Type has two string conversion methods. str() for IR printing and python_str() for serialization and error message generation. If we want to include more information in type printing while maintaining serialization/deserialization correctness, we need to split python_str() into annotation_str() and repr_str().
annotation_str is solely responsible for serialization, it strictly matches format of python type annotation. repr_str() is responsible for generating a human-readable error message that includes information like "this type is inferred, not explicitly annotated"
Closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/39449
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39544
Differential Revision: D21978759
Pulled By: gmagogsfm
fbshipit-source-id: 733566f5a62e748b5ca4bb3c5943ebb6d5b664d0
Summary:
**Summary**
This commit adds `torch::jit::RegisterBackend`, an API that allows
external backends to be registered for the execution of JIT subgraphs
outside the JIT interpreter. In order to register an external backend,
one must extend the provided abstract class `PyTorchBackendInterface` and provide
two additional functions: one that creates an instance of the aforementioned subclass
of `PyTorchBackendInterface`, and another that preprocesses a `ScriptModule` so that
it can run on the backend. Then, a `ScriptModule` that can compile and execute a given
JIT subgraph using the functions provided at registration time is generated
for each registered backend.
**Testing**
This commit adds a unit test that uses a minimal test backend
to make sure that the registration endpoint and generated
`ScriptModule` work.
```
$ python test/test_jit.py TestBackends
Fail to import hypothesis in common_utils, tests are not derandomized
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.183s
OK
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35833
Differential Revision: D21231955
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 452db1123d0e5d83f97fe5da8a00fdfdb50dbef9
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37472
Our convention is for `findX` to return an optional version and `getX`
to assert that the X is there. Fix up `getMethod` to be consistent with
this convention.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21297543
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: b40f56231cc8183e61bbb01fe5c0c113bcb6464d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36742
Now, you can define a custom class inside a TORCH_LIBRARY block.
It looks very similar to what you did before. Instead of
```
static auto m = torch::class_<Class>("Namespace", "Class").def("foo", foo);
```
you write
```
TORCH_LIBRARY(Namespace, m) {
m.class_<Class>("Class")
.def("foo", foo);
}
```
All the old usages still work, but at some point we should start
updating the tutorials when we're ready to go 100% live with the
new pybind11 style API.
custom class API previously lived in torch/ folder and in torch
namespace, so for consistency, the new TORCH_LIBRARY also got
moved to torch/library.h The definition of Library::class_ is in the
bottom of that header because I need all of the class_ constructors
available, but there is a circular dependency between the two headers.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Differential Revision: D21089648
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 8d54329c125242605336c22fa1642aae6940b507
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35218
We should express the ownership semantics directly here. Using
`shared_ptr` makes it too easy to leak ownership by inadvertently
storing a copy.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20682673
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: 32002ee515eb8bb7b37e6d0aac3c0695df4eec79
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34515
Once upon a time we thought this was necessary. In reality it is not, so
removing it.
For backcompat, our public interface (defined in `api/`) still has
typedefs to the old `script::` names.
There was only one collision: `Pass` as a `Stmt` and `Pass` as a graph
transform. I renamed one of them.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20353503
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: 48bb911ce75120a8c9e0c6fb65262ef775dfba93
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33732
move and forward instead of copy
Benchmarks:
A microbenchmark calling the add operation on two tensors in a tight loop shows a 5% improvement in performance.
No visible change for a model like resnet that does more work in its kernels.
ghstack-source-id: 99161486
Test Plan: benchmarks
Differential Revision: D20082642
fbshipit-source-id: eeac59686f8621dd5eaa85d61e6d219bba48c847
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30915
Since we now have C++14, we don't need these c10::guts helpers anymore
ghstack-source-id: 95777609
Test Plan: waitforsandcastle
Differential Revision: D18869639
fbshipit-source-id: 97716f932297c64c6e814410ac47b444c33d4e2e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28800
Fix up namespaces and make friendly error message when registered class doesn't inherit from the right base
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D18175067
Pulled By: jamesr66a
fbshipit-source-id: 5c7cf3a49fb45db502d84eb3f9a69be126ee59fb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/23689
We store methods, no reason to try to lock the CU to find a method on a
class type
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D16610045
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: d84ad81faa42c4e2da20b666fa3645e22f11dac3
Summary:
I have some test code in there as well, along with a script "test_libtorch" to run it. You'll need to modify `test_libtorch` to point to where you have `pytorch` built. I currently require that `pybind11` is included as a subdirectory of the test, but added it to the `.gitignore` to make this reviewable.
Currently, something like this works:
```cpp
struct Foo {
int x, y;
Foo(): x(2), y(5){}
Foo(int x_, int y_) : x(x_), y(y_) {}
void display() {
cout<<"x: "<<x<<' '<<"y: "<<y<<endl;
}
int64_t add(int64_t z) {
return (x+y)*z;
}
};
static auto test = torch::jit::class_<Foo>("Foo")
.def(torch::jit::init<int64_t, int64_t>())
.def("display", &Foo::display)
.def("add", &Foo::add)
.def("combine", &Foo::combine);
```
with
```py
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
val.display()
print(val.add(3))
```
results in
```
x: 5 y: 3
24
```
Current issues:
- [x] The python class created by torchscript doesn't interactly properly with the surrounding code.
```
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
return val
```
- [x] Doesn't properly take in non-pointer classes. Can't define this function signature in cpp (We don't want to support this I believe).
```cpp
void combine(Foo x) {
```
- [x] Has some issues with memory for blobs when constructing multiple objects (fix constant propagation pass to not treat capsules as the same object).
```py
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
val2 = torch._C.Foo(100, 0)
val.display()
print(val.add(3))
```
- [ ] Can't define multiple constructors (need to define overload string. Currently not possible since we don't support overloaded methods).
- [x] `init` is a little bit different syntax than `pybind`. `.init<...>()` instead of `.def(py::init<>())`
- [x] I couldn't figure out how to add some files into the build so they'd be copied to the `include/` directories, so I symlinked them manually.
- [ ] Currently, the conversion from Python into Torchscript doesn't work.
- [ ] Torchbind also currently requires Python/Pybind dependency. Fixing this would probably involve some kind of macro to bind into Python when possible.
- [ ] We pass back into Python by value, currently. There's no way of passing by reference.
- [x] Currently can only register one method with the same type signature. This is because we create a `static auto opRegistry`, and the function is templated on the type signature.
Somewhat blocked on https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/21177. We currently use some structures that will be refactored by his PR (namely `return_type_to_ivalue` and `ivalue_to_arg_type`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/21098
Differential Revision: D16634872
Pulled By: Chillee
fbshipit-source-id: 1408bb89ea649c27d560df59e2cf9920467fe1de
