Fixes#101777
- [x] Duplicated the tests from `test/jit/test_union.py` into [`test/jit/test_union_pep604.py`](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109293/files#diff-b981f6493093482b43b0e62057b0c01b004b3e932d4e63a1166c3808c0172b83), using PEP604 style Unions
- [x] Exchanged custom `get_args` and `get_origin` with `typing.get_args` and `typing.get_origin` which have the same functionality and became part of the standard library in 3.8
- [x] Added utility function `pep604union_to_union` in `tree_views.h` which converts a `BinOP("|")` node into the corresponding `Union`. This function intercepts `ScriptTypeParser::parseTypeFromExpr` and `ScriptTypeParser::parseTypeFromExprImpl` and patches the expression.
- [ ] There is a single failing test, I commented it out for the moment to see if CI complains about anything else. I tried several hours to figure out how to patch it, but I am not experienced with C++ development and debugging.
From what I could gather, the following fails:
```python
def test_union_optional_of_union_return(self):
@torch.jit.script
def fn() -> None | str | int:
y: Optional[int | str] = "foo"
return y
```
In the section:
75b954b715/torch/csrc/jit/frontend/script_type_parser.cpp (L232-L243)
When using regular `Union`, the `resolver` path is taken, whereas with the patch pep604 union, `resolveType` doesn't work.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109293
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
In Python-3.11+ typed enums (such as `enum.IntEnum`) retain `__new__`,`__str__` and so on method of the base class via `__init__subclass__()` method (see https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.11.html#enum ), i.e. following code
```python
import sys
import inspect
from enum import Enum
class IntColor(int, Enum):
RED = 1
GREEN = 2
class Color(Enum):
RED = 1
GREEN = 2
def get_methods(cls):
def predicate(m):
if not inspect.isfunction(m) and not inspect.ismethod(m):
return False
return m.__name__ in cls.__dict__
return inspect.getmembers(cls, predicate=predicate)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(sys.version)
print(f"IntColor methods {get_methods(IntColor)}")
print(f"Color methods {get_methods(Color)}")
```
Returns empty list for both cases for older Python, but on Python-3.11+ it returns list contains of enum constructors and others:
```shell
% conda run -n py310 python bar.py
3.10.12 | packaged by conda-forge | (main, Jun 23 2023, 22:41:52) [Clang 15.0.7 ]
IntColor methods []
Color methods []
% conda run -n py311 python bar.py
3.11.0 | packaged by conda-forge | (main, Oct 25 2022, 06:21:25) [Clang 14.0.4 ]
IntColor methods [('__format__', <function Enum.__format__ at 0x105006ac0>), ('__new__', <function Enum.__new__ at 0x105006660>), ('__repr__', <function Enum.__repr__ at 0x1050068e0>)]
Color methods []
```
This change allows typed enums to be scriptable on 3.11, by explicitly marking several `enum.Enum` method to be dropped by jit script and adds test that typed enums are jit-scriptable.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/108933
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109717
Approved by: https://github.com/atalman, https://github.com/davidberard98
As in Python-3.9+ `Dict`, `List`, and `Tuple` from `typing` module are deprecated in favor of their `builtins` counterparts, see [PEP 585](https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/)
Test plan: Run:
```
import torch
from typing import Union
@torch.jit.script
def to_tuple(v: Union[int, tuple[int, int]]) -> tuple[int, int]:
"""Converts int or tuple to tuple of ints."""
if torch.jit.isinstance(v, int):
return v, v
else:
return v
print(to_tuple(1), to_tuple((3, 4)))
```
It's almost impossible to add test to an existing CI, as test script will not be parseable by Python-3.8, which is a oldest supported Python version
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/98521
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98703
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
**Summary** NamedTuple attributes can be annotated to declare their type:
```python
class MyNamedTuple(NamedTuple):
x: int
y: torch.Tensor
z: MyOtherType
```
Normally in python you can also declare your types as strings, `x: 'int'`. But NamedTuples previously didn't support this, because their annotation evaluation process was slightly different. This PR updates the NamedTuple attribute type annotation evaluation method to support ForwardRef declarations (i.e. declaring as strings).
**Details**
Below I repeat the comment I left in _jit_internal.py:
NamedTuple types are slightly different from normal types.
Normally, annotations are evaluted like this (during jit.script):
1. Load strings of python code into c++ and parse.
2. Get annotations as strings
3. Use the PythonResolver's resolution callback (rcb) to convert the string into a python object
4. We call into annotations.py:ann_to_type to convert python obj from step 3 into a type that torchscript understands.
NamedTuples are more complicated, because they have sub-types. Normally, once we have the NamedTuple type object from #3, we can just look at the annotation literal values and use ann_to_type directly on them.
But sometimes, users will annotate with string literals, e.g.
```
x: 'int'
```
This also happens with PEP563 (from __forward__ import annotations)
These annotations appear in the annotation dict as ForwardRef('int').
Then, we need to convert the string into a python object. This requires having local context for custom objects or imported types. rcb() is what gives us this. So, we plumb rcb through the stack so it can be used in this context for the if block below.
FAQ:
- Why do we need this special handling for NamedTuple but string annotations work fine for normal types? Normally, we parse the string directly and then call rcb() directly from C++.
- Why not use ForwardRef._evaluate? For that, we need globals() and locals() for the local context where the NamedTuple was defined. rcb is what lets us look up into these. So, basically rcb does the hard work for us.
- What is rcb? rcb is a ResolutionCallback - python callable that takes a string and returns a type. It's generated by `createResolutionCallback.*` in _jit_internal.py.
**Why is this only partial support**:
This only plumbs the rcb through some paths. In particular, the `toSugaredValue` path uses a fake rcb.
**Alternatives**:
We could also treat this the way we treat non-nn.Module classes: we evaluate them separately, ahead of time. That solution is probably better, but probably requires a more risky refactor for the way NamedTuples are handled.
Fixes#95858
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/96933
Approved by: https://github.com/qihqi
`@torch.jit.unused` and `@torch.jit.ignore` do not allow to keep in torch scripted class member function, that has non scriptable declaration (e.g. return type)
Adding FunctionModifier _DROP to allow fully skip those functions from scripting and keep them in the code of the scripted class.
E.g. it can be used for:
```
@torch.jit._drop
def __fx_create_arg__(self, tracer: torch.fx.Tracer) -> torch.fx.node.Argument:
# torch.fx classes are not scriptable
return tracer.create_node(
"call_function",
CFX,
args=(tracer.create_arg(self.features),),
kwargs={},
)
def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[torch.Tensor]:
return iter(self.a)
```
Testing:
Added test case in `test/jit/test_types.py` with non-scriptable type annotations (fx.* classes) that fails before fix and passes after.
```
python test/test_jit.py
```
Differential Revision: [D42774830](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42774830)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/93012
Approved by: https://github.com/davidberard98
We want to make TorchRec sharded models TorchScriptable.
TorchRec sharded models uses generic types Awaitable[W] and LazyAwaitable[W] (https://github.com/pytorch/torchrec/blob/main/torchrec/distributed/types.py#L212).
In sharded model those types are used instead of contained type W, having the initialization function that produces object of type W.
At the moment when the first attribute of W is requested - `LazyAwaitable[W]` will call its initialization function (on the same stack), cache the result inside and work transparently as an object of W. So we can think about it as a delayed object initialization.
To support this behavior in TorchScript - we propose a new type to TorchScript - `Await`.
In eager mode it works the same as `LazyAwaitable[W]` in TorchRec, being dynamically typed - acting as a type `W` while it is `Await[W]`.
Within torchscript it is `Await[W]` and can be only explicitly converted to W, using special function `torch.jit.awaitable_wait(aw)`.
Creation of this `Await[W]` is done via another special function `torch.jit.awaitable(func, *args)`.
The semantic is close to `torch.jit.Future`, fork, wait and uses the same jit mechanics (inline fork Closures) with the difference that it does not start this function in parallel on fork. It only stores as a lambda inside IValue that will be called on the same thread when `torch.jit.awaitable_wait` is called.
For example (more examples in this PR `test/jit/test_await.py`)
```
def delayed(z: Tensor) -> Tensor:
return Tensor * 3
@torch.jit.script
def fn(x: Tensor):
aw: Await[int] = torch.jit._awaitable(delayed, 99)
a = torch.eye(2)
b = torch.jit._awaitable_wait(aw)
return a + b + x
```
Functions semantics:
`_awaitable(func -> Callable[Tuple[...], W], *args, **kwargs) -> Await[W]`
Creates Await object, owns args and kwargs. Once _awaitable_wait calls, executes function func and owns the result of the function. Following _awaitable_wait calls will return this result from the first function call.
`_awaitable_wait(Await[W]) -> W`
Returns either cached result of W if it is not the first _awaitable_wait call to this Await object or calls specified function if the first.
`_awaitable_nowait(W) -> Await[W]`
Creates trivial Await[W] wrapper on specified object To be type complaint for the corner cases.
Differential Revision: [D42502706](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42502706)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90863
Approved by: https://github.com/davidberard98
This is needed to support `enum.Enum` derived classes in Python-3.11
that adds `_new_member_` to classdict, see:
15c44789bb/Lib/enum.py (L529)
Following snippet illustrates the problem with the previous iteration of
the code on 3.11:
```python
from enum import Enum
import inspect
class Color(Enum):
RED = 1
GREEN = 2
def print_routines(cls):
print(cls.__name__)
for name in cls.__dict__:
fn = getattr(cls, name)
if inspect.isroutine(fn):
print(name, fn, f"has_globals: {hasattr(fn, '__globals__')}")
print_routines(Color)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/91805
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/suo
Followup similar to https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81334
In Python-3.10 type annotations from base class are not inherited to the
child class which leads to the following error:
```
% python -c "import torch;torch.jit.script(torch.nn.utils.rnn.pack_padded_sequence)"
...
PackedSequence(Tensor data, Tensor batch_sizes, Tensor sorted_indices, Tensor unsorted_indices) -> ():
Expected a value of type 'Tensor (inferred)' for argument 'sorted_indices' but instead found type 'Optional[Tensor]'.
Inferred 'sorted_indices' to be of type 'Tensor' because it was not annotated with an explicit type.
:
File "/Users/nshulga/git/pytorch-worktree/torch/nn/utils/rnn.py", line 197
data, batch_sizes, sorted_indices, unsorted_indices = _packed_sequence_init_args(
data, batch_sizes, sorted_indices, unsorted_indices)
return PackedSequence(data, batch_sizes, sorted_indices, unsorted_indices)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <--- HERE
```
Which stems from the fact that `torch.nn.utils.rnn.PackedSequence.__annotations__` returns empty list for python-3.10 as seen below:
```
% conda run -n py_39 python3 -c "import sys;import torch;print(torch.nn.utils.rnn.PackedSequence.__annotations__, sys.version_info[:2])"
{'data': <class 'torch.Tensor'>, 'batch_sizes': <class 'torch.Tensor'>, 'sorted_indices': typing.Optional[torch.Tensor], 'unsorted_indices': typing.Optional[torch.Tensor]} (3, 9)
% conda run -n py_310 python3 -c "import sys;import torch;print(torch.nn.utils.rnn.PackedSequence.__annotations__, sys.version_info[:2])"
{} (3, 10)
```
Fix by checking annotations of parent class if base one does not have any.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81506
Approved by: https://github.com/suo
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74353
Repatched `d00de0d43598522b8f6ab2de553b6aaf6768faa5` by Nora Belrose (norabelrose). With following changes:
* Register fake source of generated methods in linecache so that inspect.get_source will succeed.
* this patching is only triggered if the given dataclass passed to torch.jit.script previously. Effectively we make this feature opt-in.
## Original Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/72901.
Since we can't get access to the source code for synthesized magic methods on dataclasses, we have to synthesize our own versions. torch/jit/_dataclass_impls.py has the code that does this.
What's supported
Synthesized __init__, __eq__, and the comparison magic methods when order=True is set on the dataclass decorator
Default values for fields
__post_init__, including using InitVar fields inside of __post_init__, on Python 3.8+
Overriding __eq__ or any of the comparison magic methods to provide your own implementation
What's not supported
Default factory initializers for fields
Frozen dataclasses
InitVar on Python 3.7
__repr__ and __hash__ (these are actually implemented, but the TorchScript interpreter won't call them)
Using the != operator on dataclasses inside TorchScript; this is because TorchScript requires that you implement __ne__ to use this operator, whereas in regular Python the != operator will resolve to the negation of whatever is returned by __eq__ if there's no __ne__. Dataclasses don't actually synthesize an __ne__ method for this reason. I've been toying with different ways to fix this but != is not working in this PR at the moment.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74889
Test Plan:
unittest
Also run previously failed test:
```
buck test mode/dev-nosan //fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests -- --exact 'fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests - test_mixmatch_multiclass (fblearner.flow.projects.fluent2.definition.transformers.contrib.faim.test.faim_mixmatch_test.TestFaimTransformerMixMatch)'
```
passes
Reviewed By: zhxchen17
Differential Revision: D35206262
Pulled By: qihqi
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76771
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74353
Repatched `d00de0d43598522b8f6ab2de553b6aaf6768faa5` by Nora Belrose (norabelrose). With following changes:
* Register fake source of generated methods in linecache so that inspect.get_source will succeed.
* this patching is only triggered if the given dataclass passed to torch.jit.script previously. Effectively we make this feature opt-in.
## Original Summary:
Fixes#72901.
Since we can't get access to the source code for synthesized magic methods on dataclasses, we have to synthesize our own versions. torch/jit/_dataclass_impls.py has the code that does this.
What's supported
Synthesized __init__, __eq__, and the comparison magic methods when order=True is set on the dataclass decorator
Default values for fields
__post_init__, including using InitVar fields inside of __post_init__, on Python 3.8+
Overriding __eq__ or any of the comparison magic methods to provide your own implementation
What's not supported
Default factory initializers for fields
Frozen dataclasses
InitVar on Python 3.7
__repr__ and __hash__ (these are actually implemented, but the TorchScript interpreter won't call them)
Using the != operator on dataclasses inside TorchScript; this is because TorchScript requires that you implement __ne__ to use this operator, whereas in regular Python the != operator will resolve to the negation of whatever is returned by __eq__ if there's no __ne__. Dataclasses don't actually synthesize an __ne__ method for this reason. I've been toying with different ways to fix this but != is not working in this PR at the moment.
Test Plan:
unittest
Also run previously failed test:
```
buck test mode/dev-nosan //fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests -- --exact 'fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests - test_mixmatch_multiclass (fblearner.flow.projects.fluent2.definition.transformers.contrib.faim.test.faim_mixmatch_test.TestFaimTransformerMixMatch)'
```
passes
Differential Revision: D35206262
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74889
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74353
Repatched `d00de0d43598522b8f6ab2de553b6aaf6768faa5` by Nora Belrose (norabelrose). With following changes:
* Register fake source of generated methods in linecache so that inspect.get_source will succeed.
* this patching is only triggered if the given dataclass passed to torch.jit.script previously. Effectively we make this feature opt-in.
## Original Summary:
Fixes#72901.
Since we can't get access to the source code for synthesized magic methods on dataclasses, we have to synthesize our own versions. torch/jit/_dataclass_impls.py has the code that does this.
What's supported
Synthesized __init__, __eq__, and the comparison magic methods when order=True is set on the dataclass decorator
Default values for fields
__post_init__, including using InitVar fields inside of __post_init__, on Python 3.8+
Overriding __eq__ or any of the comparison magic methods to provide your own implementation
What's not supported
Default factory initializers for fields
Frozen dataclasses
InitVar on Python 3.7
__repr__ and __hash__ (these are actually implemented, but the TorchScript interpreter won't call them)
Using the != operator on dataclasses inside TorchScript; this is because TorchScript requires that you implement __ne__ to use this operator, whereas in regular Python the != operator will resolve to the negation of whatever is returned by __eq__ if there's no __ne__. Dataclasses don't actually synthesize an __ne__ method for this reason. I've been toying with different ways to fix this but != is not working in this PR at the moment.
Test Plan:
unittest
Also run previously failed test:
```
buck test mode/dev-nosan //fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests -- --exact 'fblearner/flow/projects/fluent2/definition/transformers/contrib/faim/test:tests - test_mixmatch_multiclass (fblearner.flow.projects.fluent2.definition.transformers.contrib.faim.test.faim_mixmatch_test.TestFaimTransformerMixMatch)'
```
passes
Reviewed By: zhxchen17
Differential Revision: D34808842
fbshipit-source-id: 02f807cff1ea99e606333960225c71a239743a4b
(cherry picked from commit ec885a2bc04f9e5f65838fa5704d9a05815ebd37)
Summary:
Original commit changeset: f5a792555c88
Original Phabricator Diff: D34398107 (d00de0d435)
Backing out as this broke fluent2 tests
Test Plan: sandcastle
Reviewed By: qihqi
Differential Revision: D34597363
fbshipit-source-id: 26bbe64b981aeb53b901cda61557614d9f28700e
(cherry picked from commit f17adfed8125ef84efaf2c8923c11a751eb7fb98)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/72901.
Since we can't get access to the source code for synthesized magic methods on dataclasses, we have to synthesize our own versions. `torch/jit/_dataclass_impls.py` has the code that does this.
What's supported
- Synthesized `__init__`, `__eq__`, and the comparison magic methods when `order=True` is set on the dataclass decorator
- Default values for fields
- `__post_init__`, including using `InitVar` fields inside of `__post_init__`, on Python 3.8+
- Overriding `__eq__` or any of the comparison magic methods to provide your own implementation
What's not supported
- Default factory initializers for fields
- Frozen dataclasses
- `InitVar` on Python 3.7
- `__repr__` and `__hash__` (these are actually implemented, but the TorchScript interpreter won't call them)
- Using the `!=` operator on dataclasses inside TorchScript; this is because TorchScript requires that you implement `__ne__` to use this operator, whereas in regular Python the `!=` operator will resolve to the negation of whatever is returned by `__eq__` if there's no `__ne__`. Dataclasses don't actually synthesize an `__ne__` method for this reason. I've been toying with different ways to fix this but `!=` is not working in this PR at the moment.
qihqi
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73066
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D34398107
Pulled By: qihqi
fbshipit-source-id: f5a792555c88f3631f97837a96687e4890660a32
(cherry picked from commit ea7f077dc49a4ee75ca0d1409aedd85228952881)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72899
Reland D33282878 (911d527b87). This is the frontend change.
ghstack-source-id: 149204031
Test Plan: Refer to D33282878 (911d527b87). Also check CI
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D34252127
fbshipit-source-id: 27b17ddd4d05d904eb91fd9ee094d9121f00e388
(cherry picked from commit 1d276baca308110ac40111ccd622400b3bbdc864)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70471
Reland D33282878 (911d527b87). This is the frontend change.
ghstack-source-id: 149114933
Test Plan: Refer to D33282878 (911d527b87). Also check CI
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D33342569
fbshipit-source-id: 57984ac67ae2c56c38f72d3b1fb69105901fb472
(cherry picked from commit b47cc935ee1fd7aa63aa453a323a637bc2c22f3c)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/71946
This commit removes some bits of code that were hard coded for Python 3.6 support from the `.circleci` and `torch` folders. It should only be merged if https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/66462 is complete.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72211
Reviewed By: dagitses, seemethere
Differential Revision: D33982604
Pulled By: musebc
fbshipit-source-id: 8f453bf9909df615addd59538adb369c65484044
(cherry picked from commit 944a9970fe68a40999b5c8af731e632c28fd15c5)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70339
When a python program is translated to TorchScript, the python exception type is dropped. This makes users's life hard when they need to categorize errors based more than only exception message.
Here we make the change so when we raise a python exception, we record the fully qualified class name for the exception. Later on when the TorchScript is interpreted, a special exception CustomJITException is thrown. User can get the python class name from CustomJITException::getPythonClassName .
Note that, this diff does not customize the mapping from C++ exception to Python exception. It's left to the users to do whatever mapping they want.
Code under scripts/shunting are just my own experimental code. I can split them out if requested.
ghstack-source-id: 146221879
Test Plan: buck test mode/opt //caffe2/test:jit
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D33282878
fbshipit-source-id: 910f67a764519f1053a48589d1a34df69001525d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/68028
Today, we demangle a typename before passing it to the TorchScript
compiler. This breaks compilation of torch classes in cases where we are
attempting to script the same class name from inside a package and out,
since we will return the same qualified name for both.
Differential Revision:
D32261907
D32261907
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: saketh-are
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: 921bc03ad385d94b9279fbc6f3b7dcd0ddbe5bc7
Summary:
This PR is created to replace https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53180 PR stack, which has all the review discussions. Reason for needing a replacement is due to a messy Sandcastle issue.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64234
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D30656444
Pulled By: ansley
fbshipit-source-id: 77536c8bcc88162e2c72636026ca3c16891d669a
Summary:
Under certain conditions (particularly if a module is frozen, like with
PyInstaller or torch::deploy), we will not have source code available for
functions. `import torch` should still work in this case, but this check is
currently causing it to raise an exception.
Since this is an initial check (if an overload is actually exercised there will
be hard failure), raise a warning and move on.
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewed By: eellison
Differential Revision: D30214271
fbshipit-source-id: eb021503e416268e8585e0708d6271c1e7b91e95
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59956
Issue #50175. Basically two things need to be checked and are lacking currently:
1. Overload declarations should always have a single `pass` statement as the body.
2. There should be always an implementation provided for decls which doesn't
have the torch.jit._overload decorator. So in this case we need to check
whether we are actually compiling a function body with decorator ahead.
Test Plan:
python test/test_jit.py TestScript.test_function_overloads
Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D29106555
fbshipit-source-id: 2d9d7df2fb51ab6db0e1b726f9644e4cfbf733d6
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57943
This is a common scenario (our own tutorials propose it), hence we should ensure it works.
A more generic solution is desirable, but this should fix the immediate concern.
ghstack-source-id: 132289683
Test Plan: Added a test
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D28316076
fbshipit-source-id: 64e9766189f40474298876227ea247ce5b699d97
Summary:
-----------
For FX traced models, types from typing modules are not available during the lookup for the function to be traced. Because of which the resolving the type results to a None type object. By enabling lookup for `typing` module in `_jit_internal.py`, we can mitigate this issue with FX_Tracing and scripting.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60413
Test Plan:
--------
with-proxy python test/test_jit.py -k TestPDT.test_fx_tracing_with_typing
Reviewed By: bhosmer
Differential Revision: D29314531
Pulled By: nikithamalgifb
fbshipit-source-id: 1aa651430b1074c7e6fa74ba02bbcc4e1b00b01b
Summary:
This adds a comment above `should_drop` to prevent someone from inadvertently breaking JIT coverage by renaming the function without updating the correct references.
The current JIT plug-in uses `should_drop` to figure out which code is going to be JIT'd. If the function is named differently, the plug-in would also need to be updated.
Question: I understand this may not be the cleanest solution. Would a cleaner solution be to create a dummy function that would simply exist for the JIT plug-in? I did not immediately do that as that may be adding unnecessary code complexity in torch.jit.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57961
Reviewed By: samestep
Differential Revision: D28933587
Pulled By: janeyx99
fbshipit-source-id: 260aaf7b11f07de84a81d6c3554c4a5ce479d623
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/55172
Description:
This is part 1 of series of PRs for supporting torch.jit.ignore as context manager. Following features are implemented in this PR:
- Unique name for the registered function under torch.jit.frontend module. The unique name is generated based on the file name and line number of context manager
- Forcing user to explicitly annotate the input and outputs.
- No side effects are considered.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D27895283
Pulled By: tugsbayasgalan
fbshipit-source-id: 5d36d9aa5d457055a6bb1676f264647a745ec36a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56516
One problem with CUDAFuture's extraction of DataPtrs from IValues is that it only supported Python objects that could be converted to "regular" IValues (e.g., lists/dicts/tuples of ints/strings/tensors/...). One notable exception are custom Python classes, which are in fact a very common data type transferred over RPC. The only solution we found for those is to use the Python pickler to extract the tensors contained in them.
We can't insert a Python dependency directly into CUDAFuture, so instead I'm proposing to use the same indirection technique used to support `getSubValues` on Python objects: define some methods on the abstract class `PyObjectHolder` (which can be used by CUDAFuture) but only implement them in the concrete subclass `ConcretePyObjectHolder` (which is only built when Python support is enabled).
I am a bit worried about the performance toll of this (pickling isn't exactly known to be cheap) but I think we should start by providing a functionally complete API. We already have ideas on how to make this faster if needed, for example by having users provide a custom DataPtr extractor tailored to their class via a decorator. (Or just use TorchScript).
ghstack-source-id: 127295014
Test Plan: Added a test later in the stack
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D27887189
fbshipit-source-id: 9d27e4e62390b836e5bb4f06f401cc002f0cf95b
