The problem:
- The new CustomOp API depends on torchgen.model
- torchgen.model imports `yaml`
- `yaml` is not a PyTorch runtime dependency
To unblock myself, because I'm not sure how long it'll take to
convince people yaml should be a PyTorch runtime dependency
(unless one of you wants to approve #100166), this PR removes the
yaml dependency from torchgen.model.
It does so by splitting torchgen.utils (the offender) into
torchgen.utils (no yaml) and torchgen.yaml (which uses yaml).
Test Plan:
- CI
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100203
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/Skylion007
simplify method_def generation
Summary:
This removes some duplication. This was originally done to streamline
a subsequent change, but that change turned out to be
misguided. Nevertheless, this is a nice simplification.
Test Plan:
This should change the code gen by removing some redundant
parentheses. Rely on CI.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100059
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary: Handwritten out ops should have feature parity with the codegend ones. This means they should resize out to the appropriate size. Q. Why are these handwritten instead of codegend anyway? Q2. Wheres a good spot to put the resize and copy helpers since they are reused in the codegend out kernels
Test Plan: ci.
Differential Revision: D42177051
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/91194
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary:
Like it says in the title. Currently, this will return output like this:
In Buck1, that's OK because Buck1's caching doesn't really care too much about
However, in Buck2, this is a disaster, because caching is based exclusively
on inputs and outputs and
The diff here proposes making the path relative to the codegen script itself,
which should carry about as much info, but avoid cache misses.
Concretely, this:
```
// generated from /dev/shm/uid-34135/cfbc5712-seed-nspid4026533424_cgpid2794673-ns-4026533443/tools/autograd/templates/python_functions.h
```
Becomes, this:
```
// generated from ../tools/autograd/templates/python_functions.h
```
So, we keep the useful part, and we get caching. This matters because those
headers are used in actions like:
```
fbcode//deeplearning/fbgemm/fbgemm_gpu/codegen:embedding_ops -- action (cxx_compile gen_embedding_backward_adam_split_unweighted_cuda.cu (pic))
```
Those actions take upwards of 5 minutes to finish, so by allowing a cache hit,
we are a) saving our users a lot of time and b) saving some RE capacity as
well.
This actually matters a lot because right now those targets are produced by
`//caffe2:generate-code`, which itself doesn't get cache hits from RE because
`generate_code.par` is non-deterministic (this is, unfortunately, true of PARs
in general), so that rule introduces non-determinism that the codegen
propagates and we get zero caching.
This diff doesn't fix `//caffe2:generate-code`'s inputs being
non-deterministic, but it does fix its *outputs* being non-deterministic, which
means the non-determinism stops there, and we get back to cache hits.
Test Plan:
- CI
```
buck2 build fbcode//caffe2:generate-code
buck2 build fbcode//deeplearning/fbgemm/fbgemm_gpu/codegen:embedding_ops
```
Reviewed By: ndmitchell
Differential Revision: D39348565
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84695
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
Also Back out "Revert D39075159: [acc_tensor] Use SymIntArrayRef for overloaded empty.memory_format's signature"
Original commit changeset: dab4a9dba4fa
Original commit changeset: dcaf16c037a9
Original Phabricator Diff: D38984222
Original Phabricator Diff: D39075159
Also update Metal registrations for C++ registration changes.
Also update NNPI registration to account for tightened schema checking
Differential Revision: [D39084762](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)
**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Facebook specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)!
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84173
Approved by: https://github.com/Krovatkin
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
The functional variant of one of the `arange` overloads has a schema mismatch with the out variant. The functional one has `Scalar step`, but the corresponding out variant has `Scalar step=1`. This isn't allowed, so it had to be special-cased in the python codegen and manually bound. This adds the default `step` value to the functional overload and removes the special-casing.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81380
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
These functions are bound manually because their default dtype isn't
always the same as `torch.get_default_dtype()`. This was necessary
because the python binding codegen effectively translated
`ScalarType? dtype=None` to `ScalarType dtype=torch.get_default_dtype()`.
I've fixed the python bindings generator to correctly pass through
`None`, and thus we can safely remove the manual bindings.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81378
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Deprecated signatures are currently "parsed" manually to find the
relative order of the argument names and all other information is
inferred from the aten schema for the non-deprecated overload.
However, this leads to problems if the argument names don't match or
if there are multiple candidates that match the ATen function call.
Instead, this makes the deprecated function a full FunctionSchema and
so the entire python signature comes solely from the deprecated
schema, with the `aten:` clause only used for the dispatch lambda call.
I have confirmed locally that there is no change to
`python_torch_functionsEverything.cpp`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82179
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Currently any function with a default dtype other than None has to be
manually entered into this function. Instead, this reads the default
directly from `native_functions.yaml`. In order to do this, I also
change `PythonSignatureGroup` to take `tensor_options_args` from the
functional variant since the out variant doesn't actually have tensor
options arguments to take the default values from.
Also note that we need to use `default_init` instead of `default`
because the out argument version doesn't have a `tensor_options`
argument to extract the default value from and so the PythonSignature
objects wouldn't match.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81479
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR is doing a few interrelated things, all of which are necessary to get correctness. Read the comment in torch/fx/experimental/proxy_tensor.py for the high level overview.
Let's break down the parts of this PR:
* Bug fix where `enable_torch_dispatch_mode` with `None` doesn't work. This make `enable_torch_dispatch_mode(current_mode.inner)` work which is the basis for how we temporarily disable fake tensor mode.
* Bug fix for when fake tensor mode is combined with a non-mode tensor subclass. This actually could be ablated from this PR but it affects where the logic for allowing non fake tensor inputs with lift goes, so it's all in here in one go. There are some relevant tests for the fix in fake tensor, but it turns out I didn't need this because I'm always using proxy tensors as a mode (which ensures the ordering is right.)
* New `lift_fresh` view operator. Note that like lift, we have to manually write the functionalize kernel for these functions.
* The actual change, which is to save constants when we see them in the proxy tensor mode, and then propagate them as we go (because otherwise you'll handle mutations on constants incorrectly--see test.)
This is mildly BC-breaking if anyone was previously interposing on
at::lift, but this operator was relatively new and I checked
functorch which has no explicit reference to lift. So I think it
should not be too disruptive.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81192
Approved by: https://github.com/samdow, https://github.com/bdhirsh
With ufmt in place https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81157, we can now use it to gradually format all files. I'm breaking this down into multiple smaller batches to avoid too many merge conflicts later on.
This batch (as copied from the current BLACK linter config):
* `tools/**/*.py`
Upcoming batchs:
* `torchgen/**/*.py`
* `torch/package/**/*.py`
* `torch/onnx/**/*.py`
* `torch/_refs/**/*.py`
* `torch/_prims/**/*.py`
* `torch/_meta_registrations.py`
* `torch/_decomp/**/*.py`
* `test/onnx/**/*.py`
Once they are all formatted, BLACK linter will be removed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81285
Approved by: https://github.com/suo
This should fix the last issue that @anijain2305 hit when running ResNet with TorchDynamo <> functionalization.
Today if you try to call an `OpOverloadPacket` from python with some arguments, we will use the types of those arguments to perform overload resolution. With some functional variants of ops, this can be ambiguous.
Today this affects just one op: `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper`, although it would potentially affect e.g. `native_batch_norm` in the future.
Example:
```
# There are technically two overloads:
# torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.default (returns 2 argument, mutates 4 of its inputs inplace)
# torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.functional (returns 6 argument, mutates none of its inputs)
# We pick the wrong one - no way to know that we should pick the functional one, just from the call site.
outs = torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper(a, a, a, a, a, a, a, 1.0, 0, 1, 0)
# raises an error - tries to call the overload with only 2 returns
return _fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper_functional[5]
```
Specifically, functionalization will bake `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.functional` into the graph, but when AOTAutograd tries to compile with TorchScript, it needs to remove the overload name (TS doesn't know how to parse overload names directly, so we need to remove the overload name and let it infer the right overload at runtime later- so it picks the wrong one).
The situation is pretty similar to inplace; `ops.aten.add` and `ops.aten.add_` represent two different `OverloadPacket` objects; they can't be overloads of the same op, because their schemas would be ambiguous - the alias annotations are different, but that isn't enough to disambiguate).
In this PR, I try to fix the situation in a pretty similar way to how we handle `inplace` in the data model: `inplace` ops get their own base operator name, but they are represented as a flag inside of `BaseOperatorName` in the data model.
Two other important changes that I made as part of this PR:
(1) Originally, there were ~100 different `*_functional` operators: e.g. we had operators named `resize.functional` and `zero.functional`. The `_functional` bit isn't actually necessary in most cases: it's only necessary for operators that **also** have a `SchemaKind.mutable` variant, where `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper` is the only op that fits that description today. So I removed the unnecessary notion of "functional" from those other ops. I also added a bunch of assertions to force this restriction.
I think that makes more sense in the long run, because it eliminates an unnecessary difference in the model. E.g. we don't have `add_.Tensor` and `add.Tensor_functional`. We just have `add_.Tensor` and `add.Tensor`.
(2) I noticed that we actually still weren't pairing up a bunch of `_foreach` operators correctly, because their input arguments were different (`self` vs. `tensors`). Since they're private API's, I went ahead and changed the argument names directly so they get matched up. Before this PR, we were generating a separate `_foreach_add` and `_foreach_add.functional` variant in a bunch of cases, that really did the same thing (but happened to have a different name for the first argument).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80556
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/albanD
