Summary:
Resolves https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/55810 by closing some possible security holes due to using [GitHub Actions `${{ <expressions> }}`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/context-and-expression-syntax-for-github-actions#about-contexts-and-expressions) in `.github/workflows/add_annotations.yml` and also patching a few other possible scenarios that could cause the workflow to fail by a PR passing a malformed artifact.
- [x] flag and remove GitHub Actions expressions in JS scripts
- [x] don't fail the workflow if the artifact doesn't look as expected
- [x] write unit tests for `tools/extract_scripts.py`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56071
Test Plan:
I tested the end-to-end "Lint" and "Add annotations" system in a separate sandbox repo, including the following cases:
- well-formed artifact
- missing artifact
- artifact containing a file named `linter-output.zip` (name clash)
- artifact whose `commit-sha.txt` doesn't contain a 40-digit hex string
- artifact whose `commit-sha.txt` contains a 40-digit hex string that isn't a valid Git hash for the current repo
- in this last case, the workflow does fail, but handling that is the responsibility of [pytorch/add-annotations-github-action](https://github.com/pytorch/add-annotations-github-action), not pytorch/pytorch
To run the new unit tests added in this PR:
```
python tools/test/test_extract_scripts.py
```
Reviewed By: seemethere
Differential Revision: D27807074
Pulled By: samestep
fbshipit-source-id: e2d3cc5437fe80ff03d46237ebba289901bc567c
