This PR applies clang-tidy readability checks to jit sources and all headers in the code base.
`readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is suppressed because it incurs too many changes. `readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is used to detect redundant inline specifiers on function and variable declarations. There are many in-class method definitions that are marked inline.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164652
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This PR applies clang-tidy readability checks to jit sources and all headers in the code base.
`readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is suppressed because it incurs too many changes. `readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is used to detect redundant inline specifiers on function and variable declarations. There are many in-class method definitions that are marked inline.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164652
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Today we can initialize a mixed-backend process group (e.g. "cpu:gloo,cuda:nccl") but we can only pass one set of process group options.
However, when we call `split_group`, we retrieve that set of options from the parent PG and pass it to the ProcessGroup::groupSplit C++ API, which then attempts to propagate that set of options to all backends.
This leads to an assert on some user code, where ProcessGroupGloo::split is expecting gloo options but receives nccl options instead.
Arguably the APIs as currently designed are just broken; we should not ever expect a single set of backend options to apply across multiple backends. However, fixing this would require changing quite a few public APIs.
As a quick fix, since user-provided options really only exist for NCCL, just warn and fall-back to defaulted options for Gloo if non-gloo options are detected.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162424
Approved by: https://github.com/d4l3k, https://github.com/fduwjj, https://github.com/H-Huang
Today we can initialize a mixed-backend process group (e.g. "cpu:gloo,cuda:nccl") but we can only pass one set of process group options.
However, when we call `split_group`, we retrieve that set of options from the parent PG and pass it to the ProcessGroup::groupSplit C++ API, which then attempts to propagate that set of options to all backends.
This leads to an assert on some user code, where ProcessGroupGloo::split is expecting gloo options but receives nccl options instead.
Arguably the APIs as currently designed are just broken; we should not ever expect a single set of backend options to apply across multiple backends. However, fixing this would require changing quite a few public APIs.
As a quick fix, since user-provided options really only exist for NCCL, just warn and fall-back to defaulted options for Gloo if non-gloo options are detected.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162424
Approved by: https://github.com/d4l3k, https://github.com/fduwjj, https://github.com/H-Huang
This updates ProcessGroupGloo to support per operation timeouts. Previously the timeouts were ignored even if they were set.
* This checks if the timeout is `kUnsetTimeout` and conditionally uses the provided timeout or the default timeout from the context.
* This exposes `set_timeout` as a standard method on ProcessGroup/Backend so we can test the global timeout.
Test plan:
```
pytest test/distributed/test_c10d_gloo.py -v -k allreduce_timeout
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/158128
Approved by: https://github.com/H-Huang, https://github.com/fduwjj
This adds new context manager based PG management to dist2. This allows for managing the active process group much in the same way as a stream
```py
with dist2.process_group(pg):
dist2.current_process_group().allreduce(...).wait()
```
matches
```py
with torch.cuda.stream(stream):
torch.cuda.current_stream().synchronize()
```
Test plan:
```
pytest test/distributed/test_dist2.py -k context
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/157988
Approved by: https://github.com/fduwjj
Relanding #148590 due to merge conflict.
This PR has multiple changes to `ProcessGroupNCCL` (which unfortunately are related):
1. When async_op=False, we directly launch the collective on "current" stream, instead of a trampoline stream and join back.
- Resolves#147729
- Resolves#146881
- Also saves two event syncs (which have overhead in case of HIP) and one pybind when we call `work.wait()` in distributed_c10d.py on behalf of user.
2. Entirely remove `record_stream` and use CPU-side stashing for managing tensor lifetime against recycling.
- Resolves#147168
3. Remove tensor life management when async_op=False; only use it when async_op=True.
4. To guard against user not calling `work.wait()`, we ask watchdog to unstash tensors after detecting completion of collectives, to prevent us from holding reference to tensors forever. This is a safety net, rather than a service guarantee, see discussion [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/147168#issuecomment-2660142460).
5. Profile in async_op=False mode would look different -- collective kernels would show up in the same line and compute kernels.
Joint work with @cenzhaometa who wants to remove the event sync overhead.
Squashed contents:
* [ptd][nccl] use current-stream as nccl-stream under async=False mode (#147820)
PTD current workflow:
- PTD creates its own dedicated `ncclStream` for comm operation
- it will first add a dependency on current-stream (typically the compute stream) to ensure tensors are ready before invoking collective
such stream synchronization become expensive in Inference world (cpu overhead: 70us vs GPU kernel time: 160us).
This diff:
- async=False [default], will use current-stream as nccl-stream and avoid the stream-sync overhead
- async=True, will retain existing logic: create new nccl-stream, let it wait on current-stream to ensure tensors are ready
- pass down async from c10d down to NCCL-PG
this helps shave off 50% CPU overhead **(70us -> 35us)**, which reduce total CPU/GPU from **230us to 195us by 15%**
* [PGNCCL] Make avoid-record-stream default
* [c10d] Add asyncOp argument to Ops
* Change python side wait
* Pass asyncOp at ProcessGroup level
* Watchdog unstashing tensors as a safety net
* Stash tensors for reduce_scatter_v and all_gather_v
Pull Request approved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149753
* [c10d] Move unstashing from watchdog to main thread
Pull Request approved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150079
* [PGNCCL][BE] Merge mutex into TensorShelf for encapsulation
Pull Request approved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150130
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150398
Approved by: https://github.com/atalman
Summary: no-except builds are terminating when this exception is thrown. We should proactively check if a backend is available before calling has_hooks, instead of trying and failing.
Test Plan: CI
Differential Revision: D71144456
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149152
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
This PR has multiple changes to `ProcessGroupNCCL` (which unfortunately are related):
1. When async_op=False, we directly launch the collective on "current" stream, instead of a trampoline stream and join back.
- Resolves#147729
- Resolves#146881
- Also saves two event syncs (which have overhead in case of HIP) and one pybind when we call `work.wait()` in distributed_c10d.py on behalf of user.
2. Entirely remove `record_stream` and use CPU-side stashing for managing tensor lifetime against recycling.
- Resolves#147168
3. Remove tensor life management when async_op=False; only use it when async_op=True.
4. To guard against user not calling `work.wait()`, we ask watchdog to unstash tensors after detecting completion of collectives, to prevent us from holding reference to tensors forever. This is a safety net, rather than a service guarantee, see discussion [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/147168#issuecomment-2660142460).
5. Profile in async_op=False mode would look different -- collective kernels would show up in the same line and compute kernels.
Joint work with @cenzhaometa who wants to remove the event sync overhead.
Cc: @ngimel @awgu @Aidyn-A @skyw @wconstab @leonardo0lyj
Differential Revision: [D70937982](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70937982)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148590
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/Aidyn-A, https://github.com/fduwjj
This PR has multiple changes to `ProcessGroupNCCL` (which unfortunately are related):
1. When async_op=False, we directly launch the collective on "current" stream, instead of a trampoline stream and join back.
- Resolves#147729
- Resolves#146881
- Also saves two event syncs (which have overhead in case of HIP) and one pybind when we call `work.wait()` in distributed_c10d.py on behalf of user.
2. Entirely remove `record_stream` and use CPU-side stashing for managing tensor lifetime against recycling.
- Resolves#147168
3. Remove tensor life management when async_op=False; only use it when async_op=True.
4. To guard against user not calling `work.wait()`, we ask watchdog to unstash tensors after detecting completion of collectives, to prevent us from holding reference to tensors forever. This is a safety net, rather than a service guarantee, see discussion [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/147168#issuecomment-2660142460).
5. Profile in async_op=False mode would look different -- collective kernels would show up in the same line and compute kernels.
Joint work with @cenzhaometa who wants to remove the event sync overhead.
Cc: @ngimel @awgu @Aidyn-A @skyw @wconstab @leonardo0lyj
Differential Revision: [D70835197](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70835197)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148590
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/Aidyn-A, https://github.com/fduwjj
This PR has multiple changes to `ProcessGroupNCCL` (which unfortunately are related):
1. When async_op=False, we directly launch the collective on "current" stream, instead of a trampoline stream and join back.
- Resolves#147729
- Resolves#146881
- Also saves two event syncs (which have overhead in case of HIP) and one pybind when we call `work.wait()` in distributed_c10d.py on behalf of user.
2. Entirely remove `record_stream` and use CPU-side stashing for managing tensor lifetime against recycling.
- Resolves#147168
3. Remove tensor life management when async_op=False; only use it when async_op=True.
4. To guard against user not calling `work.wait()`, we ask watchdog to unstash tensors after detecting completion of collectives, to prevent us from holding reference to tensors forever. This is a safety net, rather than a service guarantee, see discussion [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/147168#issuecomment-2660142460).
5. Profile in async_op=False mode would look different -- collective kernels would show up in the same line and compute kernels.
Joint work with @cenzhaometa who wants to remove the event sync overhead.
Cc: @ngimel @awgu @Aidyn-A @skyw @wconstab @leonardo0lyj
Differential Revision: [D70835197](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D70835197)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148590
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/Aidyn-A, https://github.com/fduwjj
This adds `abort` and `shutdown` to `Backend` and `ProcessGroup` objects. This simplifies the logic in `distributed_c10d.py` by having a default noop implementation for all PGs.
This will be useful for torchft and upcoming versions of NCCL which will handle abort correctly. Currently `torchft` would have to call internal methods `_abort` on the PGNCCL object directly but with this change we can now just call `.abort()` and have it work for any PG implementation.
Test plan:
```
pytest distributed/test_backends.py distributed/test_c10d_common.py distributed/test_c10d_pypg.py
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148798
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
This is a forward fix for #135338.
It hits error like this:
```
"distributed_c10d.py", line 2156, in destroy_process_group
if type(pg) == ProcessGroup and pg._has_hooks():
RuntimeError: Could not find the default backend type 0 for Process Group with name undefined.
```
When users call `init_process_group(nothing)`, default backend is not set, or set to `undefined`. Thus the above signature. Triggered by the `_has_hooks()` call.
The fix wraps `getDefaultBackend` with a try-catch.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148596
Approved by: https://github.com/LucasLLC, https://github.com/fduwjj
1. My company is using privateuseone to connect new hardware device and requires the use of `batch_isend_irecv` function. However, `batch_isend_irecv` is currently only open to CUDA, so I add `supports_coalescing` property in `c10d::Backend` to determine whether backend supports coalescing.
2. If `pg._has_hooks` return True, We don't need to determine if the current device is CUDA. So privateuseone can also support `pg._wait_for_pending_works`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135338
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501, https://github.com/albanD
### Motivation:
As design illustrated in Intel distributed support RFC https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/141741, two sections are needed to enable intel distributed backend (`XCCL`) support in PyTorch.
1. Intel GPU distributed Backend integration in PyTorch `torch-xpu-ops`.
2. **Intel distributed Backend register in PyTorch distributed package**. This PR is to contribute section 2 change.
### Example:
Here is a simple example of using spawn to launch XCCL backend and perform allreduce on XPU tensors.
```
import os
import torch
import torch.distributed as dist
import torch.multiprocessing as mp
def setup(rank, world_size):
os.environ['MASTER_ADDR'] = 'localhost'
os.environ['MASTER_PORT'] = '29500'
dist.init_process_group(rank=rank, world_size=world_size)
def cleanup():
dist.destroy_process_group()
def run_allreduce(rank, world_size):
setup(rank, world_size)
device = torch.device('xpu:{}'.format(rank))
x = torch.randn([2, 2], device=device)
dist.all_reduce(x)
cleanup()
if __name__ == '__main__':
world_size = 2
mp.spawn(run_allreduce, args=(world_size,), nprocs=world_size, join=True)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141856
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501, https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/albanD
This improves `PyProcessGroup` so you can override rank, world size and group name/desc methods from Python. These will be needed to support resizable process groups in torchft.
This also has some small fixes in test_c10d_pypg.py to use threads instead of processes which speeds up the test execution by ~10x.
Test plan:
```
pytest test/distributed/test_c10d_pypg.py
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141529
Approved by: https://github.com/fegin
1. My company is using privateuseone to connect new hardware device and requires the use of `batch_isend_irecv` function. However, `batch_isend_irecv` is currently only open to CUDA, so I add `supports_coalescing` property in `c10d::Backend` to determine whether backend supports coalescing.
2. If `pg._has_hooks` return True, We don't need to determine if the current device is CUDA. So privateuseone can also support `pg._wait_for_pending_works`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135338
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
This PR aims to support the following use case:
```python
def all_reduce_eager(x):
y = x * x
req = dist.all_reduce(y, op=dist.ReduceOp.SUM, async_op=True)
assert isinstance(req, torch.distributed.Work)
return y
@torch.compile(fullgraph=True)
def all_reduce_wait_compiled(y):
torch.ops.c10d_functional.wait_tensor(y)
return y * y
x = torch.ones(1280, 1280, device="cuda") + self.rank
with allow_inflight_collective_as_graph_input_ctx():
y = all_reduce_eager(x)
z = all_reduce_wait_compiled(y)
```
where the collective is issued in eager (with `async_op=True`) but waited in compiled region.
This is important for internal use cases such as TorchRec, where we issue collectives in eager for SparseArch all_to_all but want to wait for them in compiled region at beginning of OverArch, so that the all_to_all can be overlapped with the DenseArch compute that runs in parallel.
----
**Update**: Did two items to prevent regression to existing use cases:
1. Added memory-stressed test case to test_c10d_nccl.py `test_unwaited` to cover existing user's "not calling work.wait() for non-functional collective" use case
2. Gated all new `register_work()` / `unregister_work()` calls with `c10d::allow_inflight_collective_as_graph_input()` check, which is a new context manager that requires explicit user enablement (i.e. not on by default, so should not affect existing users).
The risk of this new version of PR causing regression should be very low.
------
Test commands:
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_inductor_collectives.py::TestCollectivesMultiProc::test_eager_async_allreduce_inductor_wait`
- `pytest -rA test/test_fx.py::TestDCE::test_keep_collectives`
- `pytest -rA test/test_fx.py::TestDCE::test_keep_collectives_no_overload`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_c10d_functional_native.py::TestWithNCCL::test_wait_tensor`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_c10d_functional_native.py::TestWithNCCL::test_unwaited`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_c10d_nccl.py::CommTest::test_wait_tensor`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_c10d_nccl.py::CommTest::test_unwaited`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/_tensor/test_tensor_ops.py::DistTensorOpsTest::test_equal`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/_tensor/test_random_ops.py::DistTensorRandomOpTest::test_manual_seed`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_ddp_baseline_aot_eager_multiprocess`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_aot_eager`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_setattr`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_unspecialized_forced_getattr_inline`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_unspecialized_forced_getattr_no_inline`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_asymmetric_compilation`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_automatic_dynamic_scalar`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_automatic_dynamic_speculation_divergence`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_automatic_dynamic_tensor`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_dim_mismatch`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_graph_break_empty_graph_still_collective`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_missing_source`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_scalar_missing_source`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_compiler_collectives_type_mismatch`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_ddp_activation_checkpointing`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_ddp_baseline_aot_eager_multiprocess`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_activation_checkpointing`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_aot_eager`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_inductor`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_setattr`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_unspecialized_forced_getattr_inline`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_fsdp_unspecialized_forced_getattr_no_inline`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_hf_bert_ddp_aot_eager`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_hf_bert_ddp_aot_eager_static_graph`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_hf_bert_ddp_inductor`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_hf_bert_ddp_inductor_static_graph`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_dynamo_distributed.py::TestMultiProc::test_hf_bert_fsdp_activation_checkpointing`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/_tensor/test_experimental_ops.py::DistOtherOpsTest::test_bernoulli`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/_tensor/test_dtensor_compile.py::TestDTensorCompileE2E::test_tp_compile_fullgraph_is_seq_parallel_True`
- `pytest -rA test/distributed/test_inductor_collectives.py::TestCollectivesMultiProc::test_allreduce_inductor_cudagraph_trees`
- `python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --ci --accuracy --timing --explain --inductor --device cuda --inference --bfloat16 --total-partitions 2 --partition-id 1 --output inference_torchbench.csv --only moco`
------
Differential Revision: [D65023311](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D65023311)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137763
Approved by: https://github.com/yifuwang
We introduced the dispatchable backend for a ProcessGroup and collective in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/86225. This PR is a follow-up cleanup to clean up the option of a ProcessGroup and ask users to either set timeout or backend later on or directly create backend after creating a PG.
Also PGNCCL is using option class from ProcessGroup but we actually should use Option from backend class. So this PR is to make the type or name to be aligned with what we are doing in cpp side. I don't change the signature for the public API, so they still use args named "pg_options"
We need to make changes to the test to make it aligned with the change.
This is try to reland D62008954 by fixing internal errors.
Differential Revision: [D62483294](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D62483294/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135653
Approved by: https://github.com/wz337, https://github.com/H-Huang
We introduced the dispatchable backend for a ProcessGroup and collective in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/86225. This PR is a follow-up cleanup to clean up the option of a ProcessGroup and ask users to either set timeout or backend later on or directly create backend after creating a PG.
Also PGNCCL is using option class from ProcessGroup but we actually should use Option from backend class. So this PR is to make the type or name to be aligned with what we are doing in cpp side. I don't change the signature for the public API, so they still use args named "pg_options"
We need to make changes to the test to make it aligned with the change.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132931
Approved by: https://github.com/H-Huang
This PR continues to clean clang-tidy warnings in torch/csrc/distributed/c10d, following #124701. In addition, libfmt dependency is added in CMake code to enable using it in the headers. The libfmt has to be added as private dependency to torch_cuda and torch_hip because they include torch/csrc/distributed/c10d/Utils.hpp which uses libfmt.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124987
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Summary:
We need a way to allow user set a customized description for a process group, e.g. FSDP, PP.
Here are several use cases of user specified group_desc:
- Logging: we can easily match a log line and understand what's this collective/pg is used to.
- Pytorch traces (e.g. Kineto, Execution Trace) can benefit from the PG desc since trace analysis, benchmarks will be able to easily differentiate PG purpose like FSDP, PP.
- Lower layer collectives(e.g. NCCL) debug: we will be able to expose PG desc to NCCL communicator so NCCL layer operations can be easily correlated to a PG.
Solution: Add a group_desc field to c10d
Differential Revision: D55781850
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123472
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
Previously we could only use `ncclCommSplit` when we knew all backends were connected on all shards (due to the need to perform a NOCOLOR split), which in practice meant we could only use it for subgroups that were copies of the entire world.
This change allows for specifying a bound device id to `init_process_group` which tells the pg and its backends that the specified device, and the specified device only, will be associated with this rank.
This guarantee lets us do an early connect (which we could not previously do due to how ProcessGroupNCCL infers devices based on tensors and not the rank number). And by doing the early connect, we have the guarantee ranks are connected and can perform nocolor splits when needed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114916
Approved by: https://github.com/kwen2501
This PR introduces a native version of c10d_functional ops. The main goal is to add collective support in AOTInductor and allow collective ops to work in multi-threaded native runtimes.
The native version also incorporated API improvements we wished to implement in Python c10d_functional:
- Removed `ranks` and `group_size` from collective op signatures which were proven to be redundant.
- Use tensor storage as opposed to `void*` to resolve in-flight work.
The native process group registration/resolution mechansim is only used for native c10d_functional in the PR. It will become the single source of truth in upcoming PRs.
The upcoming PRs will implement Inductor/AOTInductor support for c10d_functional, after which native c10d_functional will replace Python c10d_functional.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/110570
Approved by: https://github.com/wanchaol
For synchronous ops (i.e. `asyncOp = False`), we don't want to record streams because we know that the NCCL stream will join back to the "current" stream right after this op. So we might just as well keep the stream ownership of the input/output tensors unchanged. The benefit would be that the allocation/free of the tensors would look deterministic to the "current" stream so that the caching allocator can reuse memory pool for this stream in a clever way.
To prevent the input/output tensors from being recycled by python, we rely on the stashing mechanism in ProcessGroupNCCL (which can be also turned on by setting `TORCH_NCCL_AVOID_RECORD_STREAMS=1`).
This mechanism change is for libraries like FSDP which uses `all_gather_into_tensor` and `reduce_scatter_tensor` in a synchronous way and which cannot set `TORCH_NCCL_AVOID_RECORD_STREAMS=1` for their users. And therefore, this change is limited to these two collectives for now.
Cc: @awgu @janeyx99 @albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/111431
Approved by: https://github.com/H-Huang
Sequence numbers must be associated with a Work object
if we want to use it as a way to report collective progress.
The API surface change is introducing Work::getSequenceNumber, which
should eventually be exposed to python.
The bulk of this change is changing gloo to make the sequence number
be always in use and weave it to the dozens subclasses of Work.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109136
Approved by: https://github.com/fduwjj
