Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33722
In order to improve CPU performance on floating-point models on mobile, this PR introduces a new CPU backend for mobile that implements the most common mobile operators with NHWC memory layout support through integration with XNNPACK.
XNNPACK itself, and this codepath, are currently only included in the build, but the actual integration is gated with USE_XNNPACK preprocessor guards. This preprocessor symbol is intentionally not passed on to the compiler, so as to enable this rollout in multiple stages in follow up PRs. This changeset will build XNNPACK as part of the build if the identically named USE_XNNPACK CMAKE variable, defaulted to ON, is enabled, but will not actually expose or enable this code path in any other way.
Furthermore, it is worth pointing out that in order to efficiently map models to these operators, some front-end method of exposing this backend to the user is needed. The less efficient implementation would be to hook these operators into their corresponding native implementations, granted that a series of XNNPACK-specific conditions are met, much like how NNPACK is integrated with PyTorch today for instance.
Having said that, while the above implementation is still expected to outperform NNPACK based on the benchmarks I ran, the above integration would be leave a considerable gap between the performance achieved and the maximum performance potential XNNPACK enables, as it does not provide a way to compute and factor out one-time operations out of the inner most forward() loop.
The more optimal solution, and one we will decide on soon, would involve either providing a JIT pass that maps nn operators onto these newly introduced operators, while allowing one-time calculations to be factored out, much like quantized mobile models. Alternatively, new eager-mode modules can also be introduced that would directly call into these implementations either through c10 or some other mechanism, also allowing for decoupling of op creation from op execution.
This PR does not include any of the front end changes mentioned above. Neither does it include the mobile threadpool unification present in the original https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30644. Furthermore, this codepath seems to be faster than NNPACK in a good number of use cases, which can potentially allow us to remove NNPACK from aten to make the codebase a little simpler, granted that there is widespread support for such a move.
Regardless, these changes will be introduced gradually and in a more controlled way in subsequent PRs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32509
Test Plan:
Build: CI
Functionality: Not exposed
Reviewed By: dreiss
Differential Revision: D20069796
Pulled By: AshkanAliabadi
fbshipit-source-id: d46c1c91d4bea91979ea5bd46971ced5417d309c
Summary:
In order to improve CPU performance on floating-point models on mobile, this PR introduces a new CPU backend for mobile that implements the most common mobile operators with NHWC memory layout support through integration with XNNPACK.
XNNPACK itself, and this codepath, are currently only included in the build, but the actual integration is gated with USE_XNNPACK preprocessor guards. This preprocessor symbol is intentionally not passed on to the compiler, so as to enable this rollout in multiple stages in follow up PRs. This changeset will build XNNPACK as part of the build if the identically named USE_XNNPACK CMAKE variable, defaulted to ON, is enabled, but will not actually expose or enable this code path in any other way.
Furthermore, it is worth pointing out that in order to efficiently map models to these operators, some front-end method of exposing this backend to the user is needed. The less efficient implementation would be to hook these operators into their corresponding **native** implementations, granted that a series of XNNPACK-specific conditions are met, much like how NNPACK is integrated with PyTorch today for instance.
Having said that, while the above implementation is still expected to outperform NNPACK based on the benchmarks I ran, the above integration would be leave a considerable gap between the performance achieved and the maximum performance potential XNNPACK enables, as it does not provide a way to compute and factor out one-time operations out of the inner most forward() loop.
The more optimal solution, and one we will decide on soon, would involve either providing a JIT pass that maps nn operators onto these newly introduced operators, while allowing one-time calculations to be factored out, much like quantized mobile models. Alternatively, new eager-mode modules can also be introduced that would directly call into these implementations either through c10 or some other mechanism, also allowing for decoupling of op creation from op execution.
This PR does not include any of the front end changes mentioned above. Neither does it include the mobile threadpool unification present in the original https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30644. Furthermore, this codepath seems to be faster than NNPACK in a good number of use cases, which can potentially allow us to remove NNPACK from aten to make the codebase a little simpler, granted that there is widespread support for such a move.
Regardless, these changes will be introduced gradually and in a more controlled way in subsequent PRs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32509
Reviewed By: dreiss
Differential Revision: D19521853
Pulled By: AshkanAliabadi
fbshipit-source-id: 99a1fab31d0ece64961df074003bb852c36acaaa
Summary:
Stacked PRs
* #32958 - Make zip serialization the default
* **#32244 - Fix some bugs with zipfile serialization**
It includes the following changes:
* Split up tests so that we can test both serialization methods
* Loading something within a buffer doesn't work anymore, so those tests are only on the old serialization method (it's possible but introduces a big slowdown since it requires a linear scan of the entire zipfile to find the magic number at the end)
* Call `readinto` on a buffer if possible instead of `read` + a copy
* Disable CRC-32 checks on read (there was some issue where miniz said the CRC was wrong but `zipinfo` and `unzip` said the zip file was fine)
](https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/diff/19418935/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32244
Pulled By: driazati
Reviewed By: eellison
Differential Revision: D19418935
fbshipit-source-id: df140854f52ecd04236225417d625374fd99f573
