Commit Graph

295 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7c6c5d04fe Add scaled_grouped_mm_v2 and python API (#165154)
Summary:

* Add `torch._scaled_grouped_mm_v2` with more functionality and
  extensibility for future formats
* Add `torch.nn.functional.scaled_grouped_mm` as public entrypoint
* Test both original and v2 functionality

Test Plan:

```
pytest -svv -k grouped test/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py
```

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:
Signed-off-by: Simon Layton <simonlayton@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165154
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg, https://github.com/danielvegamyhre
2025-10-15 17:47:23 +00:00
512b6b59f0 Add _scaled_mm_v2 API (#164141)
Summary:

* Add new scaled-MM API to future-proof / clean-up existing code.
* Scaling is explicitly described rather than infer
* Swizzling of scaled must now be defined (vs. inferred)
* Adds API support for multi-level scaling
* Refactor dispatch logic to make it easier to add new implementations

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:
Signed-off-by: Simon Layton <simonlaytonmeta.com>

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164141
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg
2025-10-09 12:43:18 +00:00
1128f4c2a8 [cuDNN][SDPA] cuDNN SDPA refactor/cleanup, nested tensor backward, test priority bump for sm90, sm100 (#149282)
cleanup tuple/tensor boilerplate in cuDNN SDPA, preparation for nested/ragged tensor backward

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg

Co-authored-by: Aaron Gokaslan <aaronGokaslan@gmail.com>
2025-08-08 22:22:48 +00:00
7f649ed4f8 Add basic torch.hash_tensor op (#154149)
Added `torch.hash_tensor` reduction function with a `mode` argument that defaults to reduction with xor.

- The hash is always uint64.
- Integers will be casted to uint64 before performing the xor_sum reduction
- Floats will be upcasted to double and then bitcasted to uint64 before performing the xor_sum reduction

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154149
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
2025-07-23 22:28:03 +00:00
04a393507b Fused RMSNorm implementation (#153666)
Relevant #72643

Benchmarked versus unfused torch implementation and torch.compile implementation. Around 9x speedup vs unfused implementation on cuda and slightly faster vs inductor compile on 5090.

```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class RMSNorm(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, dim, eps=1e-5):
        super().__init__()
        self.eps = eps
        self.scale = nn.Parameter(torch.ones(dim))

    def forward(self, x):
        norm_x = x.norm(2, dim=-1, keepdim=True)
        rms_x = norm_x * torch.rsqrt(torch.tensor(x.shape[-1], dtype=x.dtype))
        x_normed = x / (rms_x + self.eps)
        return self.scale * x_normed

def benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape, normalized_dim, num_iterations=100, warmup_iterations=10, dtype=torch.float16):
    rms_norm_layer = torch.nn.RMSNorm(normalized_dim, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)
    input_data = torch.randn(input_shape, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)

    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)

    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- RMSNorm CUDA Benchmark ---")
    print(f"Input Shape: {input_shape}")
    print(f"Normalized Dimension: {normalized_dim}")
    print(f"Benchmark Iterations: {num_iterations}")
    print(f"--- Fused Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    compiled_rms_norm = torch.compile(RMSNorm(dim=normalized_dim)).cuda()
    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- TorchCompile Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    print("-" * 50)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    parameter_sets = [
        {'batch_size': 16, 'sequence_length': 256, 'hidden_features': 512, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 64, 'sequence_length': 1024, 'hidden_features': 1024, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float32},
        {'batch_size': 8, 'sequence_length': 2048, 'hidden_features': 2048, 'dtype': torch.float16},
    ]

    num_benchmark_iterations = 200
    num_warmup_iterations = 20

    for params in parameter_sets:
        batch_size = params['batch_size']
        sequence_length = params['sequence_length']
        hidden_features = params['hidden_features']
        data_type = params.get('dtype', torch.float16)

        shape = (batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_features)
        norm_dim_to_normalize = hidden_features

        print(f"Benchmarking with: BS={batch_size}, SeqLen={sequence_length}, Hidden={hidden_features}, DType={data_type}")
        benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape=shape,
                               normalized_dim=norm_dim_to_normalize,
                               num_iterations=num_benchmark_iterations,
                               warmup_iterations=num_warmup_iterations,
                               dtype=data_type)
```

Here are the triton compile tests ran on a 5090 (comparing this branch vs main)
```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch._inductor.utils import run_and_get_code, run_fw_bw_and_get_code

torch.manual_seed(0)

device = torch.device("cuda")

for batch in range(0, 9):
    for i in range(9, 16):
        normalized_shape_arg = (2**batch, 2**i)
        input_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i, device=device, requires_grad=True)
        weight_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i,device=device, requires_grad=True)

        model = torch.nn.functional.rms_norm
        compiled_model = torch.compile(model)
        loss = torch.randn_like(input_tensor)

        num_iter = 5
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        start_event.record()
        num_iter = 10
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        end_event.record()
        torch.cuda.synchronize()

        elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
        avg_time_ms = round(elapsed_time_ms / num_iter, 5)
        print(2**batch, 2**i, avg_time_ms)
```
main
```
32 512 0.1812
32 1024 0.19021
32 2048 0.18871
32 4096 0.17019
32 8192 0.21944
32 16384 0.38871
32 32768 0.83282
64 512 0.14705
64 1024 0.13987
64 2048 0.14111
64 4096 0.21699
64 8192 0.43141
64 16384 0.90652
64 32768 2.18573
128 512 0.19361
128 1024 0.1963
128 2048 0.20122
128 4096 0.38888
128 8192 0.93795
128 16384 2.23437
128 32768 5.50079
256 512 0.16722
256 1024 0.22856
256 2048 0.39421
256 4096 0.96621
256 8192 2.48746
256 16384 5.53571
256 32768 11.97932
```
current branch
```
32 512 0.16328
32 1024 0.18104
32 2048 0.15508
32 4096 0.14356
32 8192 0.20111
32 16384 0.45974
32 32768 0.94799
64 512 0.16874
64 1024 0.18701
64 2048 0.16107
64 4096 0.20152
64 8192 0.46568
64 16384 0.96599
64 32768 2.21661
128 512 0.14982
128 1024 0.15565
128 2048 0.22241
128 4096 0.46128
128 8192 0.88883
128 16384 2.3097
128 32768 5.84448
256 512 0.14346
256 1024 0.2007
256 2048 0.45927
256 4096 0.87876
256 8192 2.10571
256 16384 5.73948
256 32768 12.98581
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/albanD
2025-07-22 22:25:44 +00:00
35f1b4ad9e Revert "Fused RMSNorm implementation (#153666)"
This reverts commit 15ef4f28df0a14e9f0d55a57a4e2db415a303be7.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666 on behalf of https://github.com/ZainRizvi due to Sorry but this is breaking tests internally. @albanD can you please help land this change?You can follow the instructions here: https://fburl.com/fixing-ghfirst-reverts.  See D78599667 for more info ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666#issuecomment-3097690935))
2025-07-21 17:31:42 +00:00
15ef4f28df Fused RMSNorm implementation (#153666)
Relevant #72643

Benchmarked versus unfused torch implementation and torch.compile implementation. Around 9x speedup vs unfused implementation on cuda and slightly faster vs inductor compile on 5090.

```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class RMSNorm(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, dim, eps=1e-5):
        super().__init__()
        self.eps = eps
        self.scale = nn.Parameter(torch.ones(dim))

    def forward(self, x):
        norm_x = x.norm(2, dim=-1, keepdim=True)
        rms_x = norm_x * torch.rsqrt(torch.tensor(x.shape[-1], dtype=x.dtype))
        x_normed = x / (rms_x + self.eps)
        return self.scale * x_normed

def benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape, normalized_dim, num_iterations=100, warmup_iterations=10, dtype=torch.float16):
    rms_norm_layer = torch.nn.RMSNorm(normalized_dim, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)
    input_data = torch.randn(input_shape, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)

    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)

    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- RMSNorm CUDA Benchmark ---")
    print(f"Input Shape: {input_shape}")
    print(f"Normalized Dimension: {normalized_dim}")
    print(f"Benchmark Iterations: {num_iterations}")
    print(f"--- Fused Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    compiled_rms_norm = torch.compile(RMSNorm(dim=normalized_dim)).cuda()
    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- TorchCompile Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    print("-" * 50)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    parameter_sets = [
        {'batch_size': 16, 'sequence_length': 256, 'hidden_features': 512, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 64, 'sequence_length': 1024, 'hidden_features': 1024, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float32},
        {'batch_size': 8, 'sequence_length': 2048, 'hidden_features': 2048, 'dtype': torch.float16},
    ]

    num_benchmark_iterations = 200
    num_warmup_iterations = 20

    for params in parameter_sets:
        batch_size = params['batch_size']
        sequence_length = params['sequence_length']
        hidden_features = params['hidden_features']
        data_type = params.get('dtype', torch.float16)

        shape = (batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_features)
        norm_dim_to_normalize = hidden_features

        print(f"Benchmarking with: BS={batch_size}, SeqLen={sequence_length}, Hidden={hidden_features}, DType={data_type}")
        benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape=shape,
                               normalized_dim=norm_dim_to_normalize,
                               num_iterations=num_benchmark_iterations,
                               warmup_iterations=num_warmup_iterations,
                               dtype=data_type)
```

Here are the triton compile tests ran on a 5090 (comparing this branch vs main)
```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch._inductor.utils import run_and_get_code, run_fw_bw_and_get_code

torch.manual_seed(0)

device = torch.device("cuda")

for batch in range(0, 9):
    for i in range(9, 16):
        normalized_shape_arg = (2**batch, 2**i)
        input_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i, device=device, requires_grad=True)
        weight_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i,device=device, requires_grad=True)

        model = torch.nn.functional.rms_norm
        compiled_model = torch.compile(model)
        loss = torch.randn_like(input_tensor)

        num_iter = 5
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        start_event.record()
        num_iter = 10
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        end_event.record()
        torch.cuda.synchronize()

        elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
        avg_time_ms = round(elapsed_time_ms / num_iter, 5)
        print(2**batch, 2**i, avg_time_ms)
```
main
```
32 512 0.1812
32 1024 0.19021
32 2048 0.18871
32 4096 0.17019
32 8192 0.21944
32 16384 0.38871
32 32768 0.83282
64 512 0.14705
64 1024 0.13987
64 2048 0.14111
64 4096 0.21699
64 8192 0.43141
64 16384 0.90652
64 32768 2.18573
128 512 0.19361
128 1024 0.1963
128 2048 0.20122
128 4096 0.38888
128 8192 0.93795
128 16384 2.23437
128 32768 5.50079
256 512 0.16722
256 1024 0.22856
256 2048 0.39421
256 4096 0.96621
256 8192 2.48746
256 16384 5.53571
256 32768 11.97932
```
current branch
```
32 512 0.16328
32 1024 0.18104
32 2048 0.15508
32 4096 0.14356
32 8192 0.20111
32 16384 0.45974
32 32768 0.94799
64 512 0.16874
64 1024 0.18701
64 2048 0.16107
64 4096 0.20152
64 8192 0.46568
64 16384 0.96599
64 32768 2.21661
128 512 0.14982
128 1024 0.15565
128 2048 0.22241
128 4096 0.46128
128 8192 0.88883
128 16384 2.3097
128 32768 5.84448
256 512 0.14346
256 1024 0.2007
256 2048 0.45927
256 4096 0.87876
256 8192 2.10571
256 16384 5.73948
256 32768 12.98581
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/albanD
2025-07-18 23:24:21 +00:00
bfe5674e22 Revert "[cuDNN][SDPA] cuDNN SDPA refactor/cleanup, nested tensor backward, test priority bump for sm90, sm100 (#149282)"
This reverts commit 0797b2b6a80cf70a7accc3d5413186e7693d4451.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282 on behalf of https://github.com/wdvr due to reverting as discussed with @drisspg - @eqy please reach out to @drisspg for more info  ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282#issuecomment-3084759671))
2025-07-17 16:55:55 +00:00
0797b2b6a8 [cuDNN][SDPA] cuDNN SDPA refactor/cleanup, nested tensor backward, test priority bump for sm90, sm100 (#149282)
cleanup tuple/tensor boilerplate in cuDNN SDPA, preparation for nested/ragged tensor backward

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg

Co-authored-by: Aaron Gokaslan <aaronGokaslan@gmail.com>
2025-07-11 16:07:54 +00:00
c553c55be7 Revert "Fix full_like decomposition to preserve strides (#144765)"
This reverts commit 01b0f09931d47bd2716398a0c335b2807dc3074d.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144765 on behalf of https://github.com/jeanschmidt due to Seems to be breaking internal tests see [D77652778](https://www.internalfb.com/diff/D77652778), @jansel may you help get this PR merged? ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144765#issuecomment-3027975098))
2025-07-02 13:56:03 +00:00
01b0f09931 Fix full_like decomposition to preserve strides (#144765)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144765
Approved by: https://github.com/amjames, https://github.com/jansel
2025-07-01 19:13:22 +00:00
6401d1d53d Revert "Fused RMSNorm implementation (#153666)"
This reverts commit e1aee86646aa6d1b9cb9d34351e43936401c5efc.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666 on behalf of https://github.com/davidberard98 due to causing build failures on main branch [GH job link](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/16007148842/job/45156382001) [HUD commit link](e1aee86646) ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666#issuecomment-3025146176))
2025-07-01 18:46:45 +00:00
e1aee86646 Fused RMSNorm implementation (#153666)
Relevant #72643

Benchmarked versus unfused torch implementation and torch.compile implementation. Around 9x speedup vs unfused implementation on cuda and slightly faster vs inductor compile on 5090.

```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class RMSNorm(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, dim, eps=1e-5):
        super().__init__()
        self.eps = eps
        self.scale = nn.Parameter(torch.ones(dim))

    def forward(self, x):
        norm_x = x.norm(2, dim=-1, keepdim=True)
        rms_x = norm_x * torch.rsqrt(torch.tensor(x.shape[-1], dtype=x.dtype))
        x_normed = x / (rms_x + self.eps)
        return self.scale * x_normed

def benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape, normalized_dim, num_iterations=100, warmup_iterations=10, dtype=torch.float16):
    rms_norm_layer = torch.nn.RMSNorm(normalized_dim, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)
    input_data = torch.randn(input_shape, device='cuda', dtype=dtype)

    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = rms_norm_layer(input_data)

    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- RMSNorm CUDA Benchmark ---")
    print(f"Input Shape: {input_shape}")
    print(f"Normalized Dimension: {normalized_dim}")
    print(f"Benchmark Iterations: {num_iterations}")
    print(f"--- Fused Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    compiled_rms_norm = torch.compile(RMSNorm(dim=normalized_dim)).cuda()
    for _ in range(warmup_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    torch.cuda.synchronize()

    start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
    start_event.record()
    for _ in range(num_iterations):
        _ = compiled_rms_norm(input_data)
    end_event.record()
    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
    avg_time_ms = elapsed_time_ms / num_iterations

    print(f"--- TorchCompile Implementation ---")
    print(f"Average Time per Iteration: {avg_time_ms:.4f} ms")
    print(f"Total Time for {num_iterations} Iterations: {elapsed_time_ms:.3f} ms")

    print("-" * 50)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    parameter_sets = [
        {'batch_size': 16, 'sequence_length': 256, 'hidden_features': 512, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 64, 'sequence_length': 1024, 'hidden_features': 1024, 'dtype': torch.float16},
        {'batch_size': 32, 'sequence_length': 512, 'hidden_features': 768, 'dtype': torch.float32},
        {'batch_size': 8, 'sequence_length': 2048, 'hidden_features': 2048, 'dtype': torch.float16},
    ]

    num_benchmark_iterations = 200
    num_warmup_iterations = 20

    for params in parameter_sets:
        batch_size = params['batch_size']
        sequence_length = params['sequence_length']
        hidden_features = params['hidden_features']
        data_type = params.get('dtype', torch.float16)

        shape = (batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_features)
        norm_dim_to_normalize = hidden_features

        print(f"Benchmarking with: BS={batch_size}, SeqLen={sequence_length}, Hidden={hidden_features}, DType={data_type}")
        benchmark_rmsnorm_cuda(input_shape=shape,
                               normalized_dim=norm_dim_to_normalize,
                               num_iterations=num_benchmark_iterations,
                               warmup_iterations=num_warmup_iterations,
                               dtype=data_type)
```

Here are the triton compile tests ran on a 5090 (comparing this branch vs main)
```py
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch._inductor.utils import run_and_get_code, run_fw_bw_and_get_code

torch.manual_seed(0)

device = torch.device("cuda")

for batch in range(0, 9):
    for i in range(9, 16):
        normalized_shape_arg = (2**batch, 2**i)
        input_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i, device=device, requires_grad=True)
        weight_tensor = torch.randn(2**batch, 2**i,device=device, requires_grad=True)

        model = torch.nn.functional.rms_norm
        compiled_model = torch.compile(model)
        loss = torch.randn_like(input_tensor)

        num_iter = 5
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        start_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        end_event = torch.cuda.Event(enable_timing=True)
        start_event.record()
        num_iter = 10
        for j in range(num_iter):
            output = compiled_model(input_tensor, normalized_shape_arg, weight_tensor)
            output.backward(loss)

        end_event.record()
        torch.cuda.synchronize()

        elapsed_time_ms = start_event.elapsed_time(end_event)
        avg_time_ms = round(elapsed_time_ms / num_iter, 5)
        print(2**batch, 2**i, avg_time_ms)
```
main
```
32 512 0.1812
32 1024 0.19021
32 2048 0.18871
32 4096 0.17019
32 8192 0.21944
32 16384 0.38871
32 32768 0.83282
64 512 0.14705
64 1024 0.13987
64 2048 0.14111
64 4096 0.21699
64 8192 0.43141
64 16384 0.90652
64 32768 2.18573
128 512 0.19361
128 1024 0.1963
128 2048 0.20122
128 4096 0.38888
128 8192 0.93795
128 16384 2.23437
128 32768 5.50079
256 512 0.16722
256 1024 0.22856
256 2048 0.39421
256 4096 0.96621
256 8192 2.48746
256 16384 5.53571
256 32768 11.97932
```
current branch
```
32 512 0.16328
32 1024 0.18104
32 2048 0.15508
32 4096 0.14356
32 8192 0.20111
32 16384 0.45974
32 32768 0.94799
64 512 0.16874
64 1024 0.18701
64 2048 0.16107
64 4096 0.20152
64 8192 0.46568
64 16384 0.96599
64 32768 2.21661
128 512 0.14982
128 1024 0.15565
128 2048 0.22241
128 4096 0.46128
128 8192 0.88883
128 16384 2.3097
128 32768 5.84448
256 512 0.14346
256 1024 0.2007
256 2048 0.45927
256 4096 0.87876
256 8192 2.10571
256 16384 5.73948
256 32768 12.98581
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153666
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
2025-07-01 18:22:24 +00:00
fc77269262 Add randint_like tensor overload for high (#154899)
Fixes #135664

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154899
Approved by: https://github.com/StrongerXi
2025-06-06 15:48:00 +00:00
5130ac64f4 Revert "Add randint_like tensor overload for high (#154899)"
This reverts commit 72fe1d5f42aa9bffa876932a3b4fcae052b99168.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154899 on behalf of https://github.com/seemethere due to Failing internal tests see https://fburl.com/diff/bai044ob ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154899#issuecomment-2942740661))
2025-06-05 04:54:05 +00:00
72fe1d5f42 Add randint_like tensor overload for high (#154899)
Fixes #135664

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154899
Approved by: https://github.com/StrongerXi
ghstack dependencies: #154863
2025-06-04 03:37:09 +00:00
f363a3f51a Revert "[cuDNN][SDPA] cuDNN SDPA refactor/cleanup, nested tensor backward, test priority bump for sm90, sm100 (#149282)"
This reverts commit 9386701b51aadce951bf38daf497b0257a3f2211.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282 on behalf of https://github.com/jeanschmidt due to Breaking internal builds, see [D74729259](https://www.internalfb.com/diff/D74729259). @drisspg may you help out the author have their PR merged? ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282#issuecomment-2881546951))
2025-05-14 20:53:49 +00:00
9ad9a04ca7 Add TensorLR variant for fused Adagrad on CPU (#153078)
This PR adds a tensor LR variant for the CPU Adagrad(fused=True).

I copied the behavior from the tensor LR variant of CPU Adam(fused=True), where the `lr.item()` is cast to a double and passed in the default function.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/153078
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
2025-05-14 02:23:33 +00:00
eqy
9386701b51 [cuDNN][SDPA] cuDNN SDPA refactor/cleanup, nested tensor backward, test priority bump for sm90, sm100 (#149282)
cleanup tuple/tensor boilerplate in cuDNN SDPA, preparation for nested/ragged tensor backward
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149282
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg
2025-05-14 01:39:24 +00:00
3ed5f1fb77 [CUDA][cuBLAS] Aten GEMM overload for FP32 output from FP16/BF16 inputs (#150812)
Enable FP32 output from FP16/BF16 GEMMs in aten with cuBLAS. Accumulation for these GEMMs are generally already done in FP32. Adds the functionality to the following aten operators:
* mm
* bmm
* addmm
* baddmm

Follow up of customer issue: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/146241#issuecomment-2781889390

Differential Revision: [D73126191](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73126191)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150812
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/eqy
2025-04-18 01:53:26 +00:00
fa6e842527 [MPS] Make fused rms_norm traceable (#150661)
Which is a regression, introduced by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/150629#issue-2970312779 which I should have reviewed more thoroughly.

- Defined `_fused_rms_norm`, added MPS-only implementation for it and dispatch from `rms_norm_symint`,  which is registered as `CompositeImplicitAutograd`, i.e. it is not supposed to do any computations over Tensor, only dispatch to other ops
-
- Register `_fused_rms_norm` as a fallback in `torch/_inductor/lowering.py`
- Added unit test to avoid those regressions in the future

TODO:
- Get rid of this op, change `rms_norm_symint` definition to `CompositeExplicitAutograd` and implement backward function in `tools/autograd/derivatives.yaml`
- Benchmark compiler and re-enable decomp as follows when compiled code is faster
```python
@register_decomposition(aten._rms_norm_fused)
def rms_norm_fused(
    self: torch.Tensor, ndim: int, weight: torch.Tensor, eps: float
) -> torch.Tensor:
    dtr = [self.dim() - i - 1 for i in range(ndim)]
    return self * weight * (self.pow(2).mean(dtr, keepdim=True).add(eps).rsqrt())
```

Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/150629

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150661
Approved by: https://github.com/manuelcandales, https://github.com/jansel
2025-04-17 11:32:00 +00:00
52d172eafd Facilitate at::_weight_int4pack_mm_with_scale_and_zeros related registration (#147962)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147962
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168, https://github.com/guangyey, https://github.com/EikanWang
ghstack dependencies: #137566

Co-authored-by: xiaolil1 <xiaoli.liu@intel.com>
2025-04-08 15:36:07 +00:00
55e62ff74a bf16 grouped gemm (#150374)
Enabled bf16 grouped gemm with an API similar to _scaled_group_gemm, except without scale and fast accum arguments. All transpose variants are enabled, unlike scaled gemm. Ideally we'd factor out a lot more code from scaled gemm, currently there's a lot of repetition between scaled and non-scaled versions. I factored out only a helper kernel that prepares arguments.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150374
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg
2025-04-06 04:53:24 +00:00
53a1a022a9 [WIP] Initial implementation of Grouped Gemm API (#148531)
This PR provides initial cutlass implementation of grouped gemm api as described in this [document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1985La6wUUVH1AGBkNhaGKUXzx-9ybtbUp567-vYVOM4/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.g8lzbjnyzzx9). Any combination of 2d and 3d inputs is supported, with 2d input being jagged, and the offsets of the jagged input being given by device tensor `offs`. Only H100 is supported, and only fp8_e4m3 with bf16 output and rowwise scaling. All the dimensions of each individual gemm have to be multiple of 16, that's cutlass limitation.
I'll need to add those checks, for dynamic dimensions unfortunately the checks will have to be a device assert.
I had to copy-paste cutlass's `Sm90RowBroadcast` and `Sm90ColBroadcast` structs with minor changes to enable scales given as pointer arrays, ideally those should be part of cutlass itself.
I copied the schedules from the similar grouped gemm in FBGEMM, but there's a lot of room to improve perf, especially for `fast_accum=False`.
Next steps would be perf tuning and increasing coverage to B100, I don't know how cutlass grouped gemm example handles blockwise scaling on B100.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148531
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg
2025-03-11 21:49:46 +00:00
c983e1124c Revert "[WIP] Initial implementation of Grouped Gemm API (#148531)"
This reverts commit ff29791ed8f815bdbca1a5606de046380baca69d.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148531 on behalf of https://github.com/janeyx99 due to Sorry but this broke ROCm jobs on trunk ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148531#issuecomment-2714577498))
2025-03-11 14:40:58 +00:00
ff29791ed8 [WIP] Initial implementation of Grouped Gemm API (#148531)
This PR provides initial cutlass implementation of grouped gemm api as described in this [document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1985La6wUUVH1AGBkNhaGKUXzx-9ybtbUp567-vYVOM4/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.g8lzbjnyzzx9). Any combination of 2d and 3d inputs is supported, with 2d input being jagged, and the offsets of the jagged input being given by device tensor `offs`. Only H100 is supported, and only fp8_e4m3 with bf16 output and rowwise scaling. All the dimensions of each individual gemm have to be multiple of 16, that's cutlass limitation.
I'll need to add those checks, for dynamic dimensions unfortunately the checks will have to be a device assert.
I had to copy-paste cutlass's `Sm90RowBroadcast` and `Sm90ColBroadcast` structs with minor changes to enable scales given as pointer arrays, ideally those should be part of cutlass itself.
I copied the schedules from the similar grouped gemm in FBGEMM, but there's a lot of room to improve perf, especially for `fast_accum=False`.
Next steps would be perf tuning and increasing coverage to B100, I don't know how cutlass grouped gemm example handles blockwise scaling on B100.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148531
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg
2025-03-11 02:41:09 +00:00
841451af9f Revert "[Inductor] Avoid tensor slice overflow for large step (#147433)"
This reverts commit 1d7397a2d04a4d636559f41511a20f7dadbe5777.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147433 on behalf of https://github.com/jovianjaison due to breaking internal builds ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147433#issuecomment-2704506627))
2025-03-06 17:33:08 +00:00
93e9daed54 [cuDNN][SDPA][Nested Tensor] Experimental cuDNN Nested Tensor SDPA Support (forward only) (#141178)
Disabled by default for now behind `TORCH_CUDNN_SDPA_NESTED_TENSOR_ENABLED=1`

Just wanted to get this out before starting a series of SDPA cleanup PRs---the biggest thing is we don't need the boilerplate around all of the `build_graph_and_tensors*` functions anymore as we can now use the `UID`-style referencing of tensor nodes as was done for the Conv-V8 API backend.

CC @drisspg

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141178
Approved by: https://github.com/jbschlosser
2025-03-04 23:09:09 +00:00
1d7397a2d0 [Inductor] Avoid tensor slice overflow for large step (#147433)
Fixes #147071

Currently, if step is a value very close to INT64_MAX, the calculation of slice output length will overflow. This PR tries to fix this problem and thus fix #147071.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147433
Approved by: https://github.com/leslie-fang-intel, https://github.com/jansel
2025-03-02 16:07:15 +00:00
fa8e3a28a7 Revert "[cuDNN][SDPA][Nested Tensor] Experimental cuDNN Nested Tensor SDPA Support (forward only) (#141178)"
This reverts commit 533b884870acd951e684e0bf551eb76904dec047.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141178 on behalf of https://github.com/jeanschmidt due to Broke internal arvr signals, see D69971019. @jbschlosser please help the author get this PR merged ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141178#issuecomment-2676317470))
2025-02-22 17:28:12 +00:00
533b884870 [cuDNN][SDPA][Nested Tensor] Experimental cuDNN Nested Tensor SDPA Support (forward only) (#141178)
Disabled by default for now behind `TORCH_CUDNN_SDPA_NESTED_TENSOR_ENABLED=1`

Just wanted to get this out before starting a series of SDPA cleanup PRs---the biggest thing is we don't need the boilerplate around all of the `build_graph_and_tensors*` functions anymore as we can now use the `UID`-style referencing of tensor nodes as was done for the Conv-V8 API backend.

CC @drisspg

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141178
Approved by: https://github.com/jbschlosser
2025-02-21 05:22:19 +00:00
ad36f4f42c Revert "Add generator parameter to rand*_like functions (#136780)"
This reverts commit c7b2f7dd142fc97c8ce4ad7ad591687cf295fcda.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136780 on behalf of https://github.com/izaitsevfb due to internal regression ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136780#issuecomment-2613191933))
2025-01-24 19:00:21 +00:00
41b38f755c Revert "Reverting the PR adding Kleidiai-based int4 kernels (#145392)" (#145505)
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124 was reverted by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145392 due to KleidiAI clone issue.

1. This reverts commit 0940eb6d44f3cf69dd840db990245cbe1f78e770 (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145392 )and Fixes KleidiAI mirror issue.
2. KleidiAI is now cloned from github mirror instead of arm gitlab

Change-Id: I7d6eee7214cd117d3057d615936fcc3ee6052fa2

Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/145273

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145505
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
2025-01-23 18:50:59 +00:00
0940eb6d44 Reverting the PR adding Kleidiai-based int4 kernels (#145392)
Mitigation for https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/145273
Reverting https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124 and https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144074

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145392
Approved by: https://github.com/ZainRizvi, https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/atalman, https://github.com/digantdesai
2025-01-22 20:11:49 +00:00
46fbd63405 Fix unbind_copy and add its decomposition (#134319)
* Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/130829

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134319
Approved by: https://github.com/amjames, https://github.com/eellison
2025-01-17 18:21:22 +00:00
Sam
c7b2f7dd14 Add generator parameter to rand*_like functions (#136780)
Fixes #128786
Fixes #101974
Fixes #27072

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136780
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee, https://github.com/ezyang
2025-01-15 21:16:52 +00:00
94737e8a2a [ARM][feat]: Add 4 bit dynamic quantization matmuls & KleidiAI Backend (#134124)
Description:
1. Quantize Linear Layer Weights to 4-bits:
Quantize the weights of the Linear layer to 4 bits, using symmetric quantization.
Pack two 4-bit weights into one uint8 container.
Choose a quantization scheme (channel-wise or group-wise), with the group size being a multiple of 32.

2. Prepare Quantized Weights, Scales, and Optional Bias:
After quantizing, obtain the quantized_weights, scales, and groupsize.
If the original Linear layer has a bias, prepare it as well.

3. Pack the Weights Efficiently:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight to optimally pack the weights, scales, and optional bias.
```python
packed_weights = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight(weight, scales_and_zeros, bias, groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Input parameters should include:
in_features and out_features (the same as the Linear layer’s corresponding parameters).

4. Perform Dynamic Quantized Matrix Multiplication:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit to perform matrix multiplication with quantized weights.
```python
output = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit(input, packed_weights,  groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Inputs required include:
The input tensor, packed_weights , groupsize, and the in_features and out_features.

API Usage: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/143289

Model Perf :
7B Transformer model:
Prefill : 340 t/s
Decode  : 40  t/s
2B Transformer model
Prefill : 747 t/s
Decode  : 80  t/s

Tests:
python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight
Ran 1 test in 0.016s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 0.077s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test_compile_dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 11.454s

Change-Id: Ia1672bad5e6ec94e64d8bb1971395d60f4b3a452

Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124
Approved by: https://github.com/digantdesai, https://github.com/malfet
2024-12-20 19:32:03 +00:00
8136daff5a Revert "[ARM][feat]: Add 4 bit dynamic quantization matmuls & KleidiAI Backend (#134124)"
This reverts commit 4b82251011f85f9d1395b451d61e976af844d9b1.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124 on behalf of https://github.com/huydhn due to Sorry for reverting your change but it breaks lots of internal build ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124#issuecomment-2555953189))
2024-12-19 23:33:17 +00:00
4b82251011 [ARM][feat]: Add 4 bit dynamic quantization matmuls & KleidiAI Backend (#134124)
Description:
1. Quantize Linear Layer Weights to 4-bits:
Quantize the weights of the Linear layer to 4 bits, using symmetric quantization.
Pack two 4-bit weights into one uint8 container.
Choose a quantization scheme (channel-wise or group-wise), with the group size being a multiple of 32.

2. Prepare Quantized Weights, Scales, and Optional Bias:
After quantizing, obtain the quantized_weights, scales, and groupsize.
If the original Linear layer has a bias, prepare it as well.

3. Pack the Weights Efficiently:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight to optimally pack the weights, scales, and optional bias.
```python
packed_weights = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight(weight, scales_and_zeros, bias, groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Input parameters should include:
in_features and out_features (the same as the Linear layer’s corresponding parameters).

4. Perform Dynamic Quantized Matrix Multiplication:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit to perform matrix multiplication with quantized weights.
```python
output = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit(input, packed_weights,  groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Inputs required include:
The input tensor, packed_weights , groupsize, and the in_features and out_features.

API Usage: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/143289

Model Perf :
7B Transformer model:
Prefill : 340 t/s
Decode  : 40  t/s
2B Transformer model
Prefill : 747 t/s
Decode  : 80  t/s

Tests:
python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight
Ran 1 test in 0.016s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 0.077s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test_compile_dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 11.454s

Change-Id: Ia1672bad5e6ec94e64d8bb1971395d60f4b3a452

Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124
Approved by: https://github.com/digantdesai, https://github.com/malfet
2024-12-19 18:51:26 +00:00
288aa87383 [Inductor][CPU] disable bernoulli_p decomposition (#143460)
Fix https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/142853
`fallback_random=True` should cause RNG to match between compile/eager (by having compile fall back to eager for RNG ops), but the `bernoulli_p` decompose function is not fully consistent with the eager CPU implementation.
We remove the decomp and keep the version for` fallback_random=False`.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143460
Approved by: https://github.com/leslie-fang-intel, https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/jansel
2024-12-19 11:21:35 +00:00
14fe1f7190 Revert "[ARM][feat]: Add 4 bit dynamic quantization matmuls & KleidiAI Backend (#134124)"
This reverts commit d3ff2d42c28a2c187cbedfd8f60b84a4dfa2d6bf.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124 on behalf of https://github.com/malfet due to This broke S390 builds, includes cpuinfo unconditionally ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124#issuecomment-2552560208))
2024-12-19 01:05:11 +00:00
d3ff2d42c2 [ARM][feat]: Add 4 bit dynamic quantization matmuls & KleidiAI Backend (#134124)
Description:
1. Quantize Linear Layer Weights to 4-bits:
Quantize the weights of the Linear layer to 4 bits, using symmetric quantization.
Pack two 4-bit weights into one uint8 container.
Choose a quantization scheme (channel-wise or group-wise), with the group size being a multiple of 32.

2. Prepare Quantized Weights, Scales, and Optional Bias:
After quantizing, obtain the quantized_weights, scales, and groupsize.
If the original Linear layer has a bias, prepare it as well.

3. Pack the Weights Efficiently:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight to optimally pack the weights, scales, and optional bias.
```python
packed_weights = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight(weight, scales_and_zeros, bias, groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Input parameters should include:
in_features and out_features (the same as the Linear layer’s corresponding parameters).

4. Perform Dynamic Quantized Matrix Multiplication:
Use torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit to perform matrix multiplication with quantized weights.
```python
output = torch.ops.aten._dyn_quant_matmul_4bit(input, packed_weights,  groupsize, in_features, out_features)
```
Inputs required include:
The input tensor, packed_weights , groupsize, and the in_features and out_features.

API Usage: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/143289

Model Perf :
7B Transformer model:
Prefill : 340 t/s
Decode  : 40  t/s
2B Transformer model
Prefill : 747 t/s
Decode  : 80  t/s

Tests:
python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight
Ran 1 test in 0.016s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test__dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 0.077s

OK

python test/test_linalg.py -k test_compile_dyn_quant_matmul_4bit
Ran 8 tests in 11.454s

Change-Id: Ia1672bad5e6ec94e64d8bb1971395d60f4b3a452

Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134124
Approved by: https://github.com/digantdesai, https://github.com/malfet
2024-12-18 22:30:07 +00:00
f85e238186 [aotd] capture rrelu_with_noise noise mutation in compile (#141867)
Rebase-copy of long standing already approved PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138503 that was blocked on landing by xla build issues.

Got a new  PR with the same content (ghstack checkout was failing due to changed submodules)

Corresponding xla PR:
https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/8363

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141867
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
2024-12-04 12:18:58 +00:00
da5b281f23 Generate op variants for core CIA ops (#141797)
There are four core ATen ops with Composite Implicit Autograd (CIA) dispatch: upsample_bilinear2d.vec, upsample_nearest2d.vec, avg_pool1d, and adaptive_avg_pool1d. Op variant auto-generation is currently skipped for CIA ops. In preparation to disable the decompositions for upsample ops by default in export, we need to generate out variants for these ops.

This change enables autogen for core-tagged CIA ops, which enables generation of upsample_bilinear2d.vec_out and upsample_nearest2d.vec_out.

Test Plan:
Added a new test test_functional_variant_autogen_out_variant_core to cover this case in test_codegen.py.
Confirmed that upsample_bilinear2d.vec_out and upsample_nearest2d.vec_out op overloads are registered (they were previously not available).

Differential Revision: D66590257

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141797
Approved by: https://github.com/larryliu0820
2024-12-03 22:57:46 +00:00
0fbc0830ba [export] Add device and dtype fields to assert_tensor_metadata (#141071)
Differential Revision: [D66321128](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66321128)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/141071
Approved by: https://github.com/yushangdi, https://github.com/zou3519
2024-11-22 20:54:55 +00:00
161425ff9f Added aten.bernoulli.p and aten.bernoulli.default decompositions (#139141)
Fixes #105519

Added aten.bernoulli.p decomposition and moved/rewrote aten.bernoulli.deafult to make them included in core aten decomposition.

Tested the sample code in [105519](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/105519), torch.bernoulli could be decomposed by the code snippet.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139141
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
2024-11-20 19:52:57 +00:00
6a368b3fc5 Add ScalarList overload to _foreach_lerp (#134482)
Related:
- https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/133367

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134482
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
2024-11-12 19:03:41 +00:00
71d8bb7ede implement torch._foreach_rsqrt (#134574)
Related:
- #133367 c

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134574
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/janeyx99
2024-11-12 15:34:35 +00:00
f77eb07662 Split int4wo weight packing (#139611)
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/ao/issues/1117.

This PR is to seperate int4wo weight packing between CPU and other devices, to help implement `INT4CPULayout` in torchao based on https://github.com/pytorch/ao/issues/1117#issuecomment-2451252756.

Now, for CPU, the input `weight` of `_convert_weight_to_int4pack_for_cpu` is [n, k] int32, output is [n, k / 2] uint8. The input packed weight of `_weight_int4pack_mm_for_cpu` is [n, k / 2] uint8.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139611
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
2024-11-12 10:12:50 +00:00
38645e8a3e Revert "Fix unbind_copy and add its decomposition (#134319)"
This reverts commit 8aedc649bdd0789b0ea9b9348d552fb1b0e437ff.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134319 on behalf of https://github.com/huydhn due to Sorry for reverting your PR, but this is still failing the same test on ExecuTorch ([comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134319#issuecomment-2443209139))
2024-10-29 04:54:37 +00:00