This pr expose torch._higher_order_ops.cond as torch.cond.
1. Need to add #noqa: F811 to the _check calls in torch/__init__.py to address some confusing linter error "Redefinition of unused 'cond'" but only one cond is imported and for these lines that have this error, they don't define the cond but just use it as an argument.
2. Also add cond to the list that allows it to be traced through so as dynamo could trigger the CondHigherOrder logic instead of creating a TorchVariable.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/110293
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Fixes#109842.
This disables the implicit `UserWarning`s that were raised for deprecated `torch` attributes. The filtering was designed to be as specific as possible, in order to not filter any other warnings that may be raised.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109890
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary:
FBGEMM uses `self.iter.is_cuda` to check if the tensor is for CUDA. This diff enables similar feature `self.iter.is_mtia` for tensors with MTIA device key.
Test Plan: See diff D48693225
Reviewed By: jackm321
Differential Revision: D48809191
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/108310
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
This is a stride based attribute for a tensor available in Python.
This can help inspect tensors generated using `torch.empty_permuted(.., physical_layout, ...)`, where physical_layout should match the dim_order returned here. `empty_permuted` will be renamed to use dim_order as the param name in the future. And also help Executorch export pipeline with implementing dim_order based tensors.
Differential Revision: D48134476
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106835
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This updates ruff to 0.285 which is faster, better, and have fixes a bunch of false negatives with regards to fstrings.
I also enabled RUF017 which looks for accidental quadratic list summation. Luckily, seems like there are no instances of it in our codebase, so enabling it so that it stays like that. :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107519
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This updates ruff to 0.285 which is faster, better, and have fixes a bunch of false negatives with regards to fstrings.
I also enabled RUF017 which looks for accidental quadratic list summation. Luckily, seems like there are no instances of it in our codebase, so enabling it so that it stays like that. :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107519
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Some notable changes:
1. `constrain_as_size` allows min value to be less than 2 as it will unconditionally assume min >= 2 for compiler purposes. Instead, we add additional check to make sure max value is always greater than 2.
2. Previously, we used to runtime assert on the unbacked symint's val range which would be always between [2, max]. I modified this logic to assert on [0, max] unless user explicitly specifies the min range.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106591
Approved by: https://github.com/gmagogsfm, https://github.com/ezyang
Some notable changes:
1. `constrain_as_size` allows min value to be less than 2 as it will unconditionally assume min >= 2 for compiler purposes. Instead, we add additional check to make sure max value is always greater than 2.
2. Previously, we used to runtime assert on the unbacked symint's val range which would be always between [2, max]. I modified this logic to assert on [0, max] unless user explicitly specifies the min range.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106591
Approved by: https://github.com/gmagogsfm, https://github.com/ezyang
As part of this, a new `AutocastIPU` dispatch key has been added.
There's an existing PR, #85043, to make `Autocast` a proper per-backend functionality key, but it ran into issues with layering with other functionality keys and went stale.
This has been tested in the out-of-tree IPU PyTorch backend.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103890
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
At high current implementation of constrains functions (constrain_as_**) will raise exception for the following code snippets:
```
def f(x):
a = x.item()
constrain_as_size(a, 4, 7)
return torch.empty((a, 4))
inp = torch.tensor([5])
ep = torch._export.export(f, (inp,))
```
The reason is because current constrain logic is:
1) Purely python so it won't survive AOT export (the full node is gone after AOT export since AOT export only maintains aten level op).
2) Utilize side effect to add range constraints for traced symbol's shape env ([code](9591e52880/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (L370-L372))).
3) If runtime assertion is turned on (by default). [`_AddRuntimeAssertionsForConstraintsPass`](9591e52880/torch/_export/passes/add_runtime_assertions_for_constraints_pass.py (L98-L100)) will try to append assertion node based on range constrains extracted from shape env of symbol during another interpretation round.
4). However, since 1), in the round of AOT export, range constraints logic won't run for symbols generated during this round. And later there is no range constrains information available for assertion round and caused issue.
5) As a result of above, it will failure at `torch.empty((a, 4))` (there is no constrains for `a` that it must be positive).
The fix here is just to implement range constrain logic as a native aten op (CPU implementation as no-op) to make it be able to survive AOT export.
**NOTE:**
[Logic](2d745b95d7/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (L350-L365C15)) within [`constrain_range`](2d745b95d7/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (LL313C74-L313C74)) is split out as `constrain_range_int` to capture case when non `SymInt` is passed in and reused in the new `_constrain_range`. The reason is when non `SymInt` is provided:
* If it directly calls `sym_constrain_range`, the C++ version will be called which will be no-op.
* So in this case it calls `constrain_range_int` instead to be able to capture issue like user provides a input whose tensor's shape could be out of range during exporting, like the following for above code example:
```
...
inp = torch.tensor([10])
ep = torch._export.export(f, (inp,)) # immediately raise error
```
Differential Revision: [D46734204](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46734204)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103346
Approved by: https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan
There are some I can't easily switch due to reasons like:
- Dynamo modelling the guard
- BC concerns (for torch.autograd.set_multithreading_enabled)
Test Plan:
- existing tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102642
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR introduces a new operator called aten._assert_async.msg, which allows passing a tensor value and assertion message as inputs. As part of TorchDynamo, we're replacing the use of torch._assert with this new operator so that make_fx also knows how to handle assertions. This is subset of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98878, refer there for historic reviews.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100101
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Summary: Add new experimental python op (`torch.nonzero_static`) for export. There is NO cuda impl included in this PR
Example:
Say input tensor is `x = torch.tensor([[1, 0], [3, 2]])`
call regular `nonzero()` on x will give you a tensor `tensor([[0, 0], [1, 0], [1, 1])`
call `nonzero_static(x, size=4)` on x will give you a tensor `tensor([[0, 0], [1, 0], [1, 1], [fill_value, fill_value])` (padded)
call `nonzero_static(x, size=2)` on x will give you a tensor `tensor([[0, 0], [1, 0])` (truncated)
Test Plan:
**Unit Tests**
```
buck test @mode/dev-nosan //caffe2/test:test_dynamo -- 'caffe2/test:test_dynamo - test_export.py::ExportTests::test_export_with_nonzero_static' -- 'caffe2/test:test_dynamo - test_misc.py::MiscTests::test_nonzero_static'
```
**PT2 Export with `nonzero_static()`**
Example of `GraphModule` in the exported graph
```
def forward(self, x):
arg0, = fx_pytree.tree_flatten_spec(([x], {}), self._in_spec)
nonzero_static_default = torch.ops.aten.nonzero_static.default(arg0, size = 4); arg0 = None
return pytree.tree_unflatten([nonzero_static_default], self._out_spec)
```
Differential Revision: D44324808
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97417
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
As in the title.
The `masked_grad` kw argument is required for `to_dense` backward to distinguish the expected semantics of sparse tensors. `masked_grad=True` means that the `to_dense` backward will apply a mask to the returned gradient where the mask is defined by the input indices. The default semantics implies `masked_grad==True` for BC but see the [comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/96095/files#diff-d4df180433a09071e891d552426911c227b30ae9b8a8e56da31046e7ecb1afbeR501-R513) in `to_dense_backward`.
As a consequence, existing code that is run through autograd engine must replace `.to_dense()` calls with `.to_dense(masked_grad=False)`. For example,
```python
torch.autograd.gradcheck(lambda x: torch.sum(x, [0]).to_dense())
torch.autograd.gradcheck(lambda x: torch.sparse.sum(x, [0]).to_dense())
```
(recall, gradcheck has `masked=False` as default) must be updated to
```python
torch.autograd.gradcheck(lambda x: torch.sum(x, [0]).to_dense(masked_grad=False))
torch.autograd.gradcheck(lambda x: torch.sparse.sum(x, [0]).to_dense(masked_grad=True), masked=True)
```
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/95550
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/96095
Approved by: https://github.com/cpuhrsch
torch.empty_permuted is a generalized version of torch.empty(memory_format=...), where you can pass an arbitrary physical layout as a tuple of dims to allow you to setup dense, non-overlapping tensors with non-standard memory format. Check the docblock for a full description of semantics.
The initial motivation for this PR is with guard-less unbacked SymInts. Traditionally, the way we allocate dense tensors with arbitrary layout is with `empty_strided`. However, `empty_strided` does not know that the given strides are actually contiguous, and must test this manually to find out if it is the case. With `empty_permuted`, this is known statically to be the case and helps us skip some 0/1 guards.
However, I also think torch.empty_permuted is a useful API in its own right. It is technically possible to simulate this with an empty and a permute; however, there are some downsides:
* The manual incant is tricky to work out. To allocate an NHWC tensor, the invocation is `torch.empty(N, H, W, C).permute(0, 3, 1, 2)`; the permute call has to take NHWC to NCHW, and is the *inverse* of the permutation people are typically thinking of when they talk about NHWC (0, 2, 3, 1). Instead, torch.empty_permuted lets you say `torch.empty_permuted((N, C, H, W), (0, 2, 3, 1))`, letting you provide the intuitive permutation. It can be literally be read off as NHWC if you assign N=0, C=1, H=2, W=3.
* An empty(requires_grad=True).permute() is no longer a leaf tensor. You can force it to be a leaf with a detach(), but it is more straightforward and less error prone to allow directly allocating a tensor with the correct permutation.
It is also technically possible to simulate this with empty_strided. However, this requires the user to manually compute the contiguous output strides and is bad from a reduction of guards perspective. For what it's worth, this is one of the more common uses of as_strided in the wild, and it would be nice to get rid of it.
A nice enhancement of this feature would be to accept `physical_layout` anywhere `memory_format` is accepted. However, this would be a pretty involved change, so I'm doing the easy thing instead.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/95069
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/dagitses
Summary:
Regularize mask handling for attn_mask and key_padding_mask
* Update documentation to remove reference to byte masks (which were deprecated long ago)
* Introduce check and warn about deprecation if attn_mask and key_padding_mask types mismatch
* Convert all masks to float before combining
* Combine by adding
Test Plan: sandcastle & github CI
Differential Revision: D42653215
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/92733
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/drisspg
