`grad_dtype` is a new attribute on Tensor to control gradient dtype:
- Access/setting is leaf-only.
- grad_dtype is respected when (1) when assigning to .grad, and (2) in the engine after the previous node produces incoming gradients for AccumulateGrad. (See table below for details)
- Not setting grad_dtype preserves the current behavior. Accessing it returns `t.dtype`
- `grad_dtype` cannot be set when there is already a `.grad` present and the dtypes conflict.
| `grad_dtype` setting | Setting `.grad` manually | Incoming gradient from autograd engine |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| **Default (tensor’s dtype)** | `.grad` must match tensor’s dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to tensor’s dtype |
| **Set to specific dtype** | `.grad` must match that dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to the specified dtype |
| **Set to `None`** | `.grad` may be any dtype | Engine does not cast; accepts incoming grad dtype as-is |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162815
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
The big semantic change (and the reason for this port) is that we no longer monkeypatch Tensor with torchdim's special methods. The new algorithm for handling dispatch is that we first land in `__torch_function__` and we see if a special FCD implementation needs to be dispatch to first, and if there is nothing we fallback to the standard level strategy.
Because there is no longer C binding equivalent of classes, we've condensed _C.Dim and Dim together, and similar for Tensor. This resulted in some bugs as the Python API is sometimes different from the C API. I've attempted to disambiguate these but there may still be mistakes (many early bugs were due to this problem). Dim and DimEntry are especially painful as Dim must abide by Tensor equality semantics, but is pointer equality in C (DimEntry doesn't have this problem). Another difference between C/Python that is subtle is we no longer get implicit conversions from Dim to DimEntry, this also caused some bugs.
Much of the mechanical porting work was done by claude code. I have a separate PR that deletes functorch._C, but it was useful having dim.cpp to point claude at it so I haven't done it in this PR. From a reviewing perspective, I need to re-review that I didn't forget to port anything, some noticeably missing "small" things are patched_dim_method. I am still in progress of carefully doing a side-by-side review of ports; "simplifications" from claude code were also a major source of bugs.
There are two major feature gaps in the implementation:
- DelayedTensor and dot handling are not implemented yet. This should be reasonably easy, just need to do it. However, for the purposes of sharded propagation it is actually better not to reconstruct matmuls.
- Splitting dimensions with an index like `[x, y]` doesn't work. The problem is that `__getitem__` interprets this as advanced indexing and sends the list to torch.tensor to turn into a tensor, instead of being eligible for `__torch_function__`. I think I might need to hard code a special case for this or something?
Signed-off-by: Edward Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160236
Approved by: https://github.com/zdevito, https://github.com/albanD
Added `torch.hash_tensor` reduction function with a `mode` argument that defaults to reduction with xor.
- The hash is always uint64.
- Integers will be casted to uint64 before performing the xor_sum reduction
- Floats will be upcasted to double and then bitcasted to uint64 before performing the xor_sum reduction
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154149
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR introduces the rest of the keyword-arguments added in DLPack
version 2023.12: `dl_device` and `copy`.
In summary, we handle these arguments in the C++ implementation of
`to_dlpack(...)` at _torch/csrc/Module.cpp_, by calling the
`maybeCopyTensor` function at _aten/src/ATen/DLConvertor.cpp_. It also
introduces the following changes:
- Add a new Python API `torchDeviceToDLDevice()`, which is simply a
refactoring of the `getDLDevice()` function at
_aten/src/ATen/DLConvertor.cpp_.
- Add both keyword-arguments to the `from_dlpack()` function at
_torch/utils/dlpack.py_ and to the `Tensor.__dlpack__()` dunder
method.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150218
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
ghstack dependencies: #150216, #150217
This PR makes the necessary changes in order to upgrade PyTorch DLPack
support to version 1.0. In summary, we add support for the following:
- Support both `DLManagedTensor` and `DLManagedTensorVersioned` when
producing and consuming DLPack capsules
- New parameter for `__dlpack__` method: `max_version`
- Version checks:
- Fallback to old implementation if no `max_version` or if version
lower than 1.0
- Check that the to-be-consumed capsule is of version up to 1.X
In order to accommodate these new specifications, this PR adds the
following main changes:
- `torch._C._to_dlpack_versioned` Python API (Module.cpp): new Python
API for creating a versioned DLPack capsule (called by `__dlpack__`
method)
- `DLPackTraits<T>` class (DLConvertor.h): select the correct
traits (e.g. capsule name, conversion functions) depending on which
DLPack tensor class is being used
- `toDLPackImpl<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): populates the
common fields of both classes
- `fromDLPackImpl<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): constructs a tensor
from a DLPAck capsule
- `fillVersion<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): populates the version
field for `DLManagedTensorVersioned` (no-op for `DLManagedTensor`)
- `tensor_fromDLPackImpl<T>` function (tensor_new.cpp): outer function
for constructing a tensor out of a DLPack capsule that also marks the
capsule as used
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145000
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR makes the necessary changes in order to upgrade PyTorch DLPack
support to version 1.0. In summary, we add support for the following:
- Support both `DLManagedTensor` and `DLManagedTensorVersioned` when
producing and consuming DLPack capsules
- New parameter for `__dlpack__` method: `max_version`
- Version checks:
- Fallback to old implementation if no `max_version` or if version
lower than 1.0
- Check that the to-be-consumed capsule is of version up to 1.X
In order to accommodate these new specifications, this PR adds the
following main changes:
- `torch._C._to_dlpack_versioned` Python API (Module.cpp): new Python
API for creating a versioned DLPack capsule (called by `__dlpack__`
method)
- `DLPackTraits<T>` class (DLConvertor.h): select the correct
traits (e.g. capsule name, conversion functions) depending on which
DLPack tensor class is being used
- `toDLPackImpl<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): populates the
common fields of both classes
- `fromDLPackImpl<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): constructs a tensor
from a DLPAck capsule
- `fillVersion<T>` function (DLConvertor.cpp): populates the version
field for `DLManagedTensorVersioned` (no-op for `DLManagedTensor`)
- `tensor_fromDLPackImpl<T>` function (tensor_new.cpp): outer function
for constructing a tensor out of a DLPack capsule that also marks the
capsule as used
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145000
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This word appears often in class descriptions and is not consistently spelled. Update comments and some function names to use the correct spelling consistently. Facilitates searching the codebase.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/155944
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Reference: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/#assert-statements
> Unlike Black, Ruff prefers breaking the message over breaking the assertion, similar to how both Ruff and Black prefer breaking the assignment value over breaking the assignment target:
>
> ```python
> # Input
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
>
> # Black
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
> # Ruff
> assert len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates, (
> f"This tests needs at least {priority + num_duplicates} many types."
> )
> ```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144546
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
#### Summary
This pull request introduces new weighted loss functions to the PyTorch library: `weighted_huber_loss`, `wmse_loss`, and `wmae_loss`. These functions allow for precise control over the influence of each sample during training, important for imbalanced data or when certain samples are more significant than others.
#### Changes
- **`weighted_huber_loss`**: Huber loss modified to incorporate weights, providing a balance between L1 and L2 loss based on the `delta` parameter.
- **`wmse_loss`** (Weighted Mean Squared Error): Applies weights to the standard MSE loss, useful for emphasizing certain samples in regression tasks.
- **`wmae_loss`** (Weighted Mean Absolute Error): Adjusts MAE loss calculation by including weights, ideal for datasets with outliers.
#### Code Details
- **Input Validation**: Ensures `input`, `target`, and `weights` tensors match in size to prevent broadcasting errors.
- **Reduction Options**: Supports `none`, `mean`, and `sum` reductions to suit various computational needs.
- **Backward Compatibility**: Maintains support for deprecated arguments `size_average` and `reduce`, while encouraging use of the `reduction` argument.
#### Usage Example
```python
import torch
input = torch.tensor([0.5, 2.5, 2.0], dtype=torch.float32)
target = torch.tensor([0.0, 2.0, 1.5], dtype=torch.float32)
weights = torch.tensor([1.0, 0.5, 1.5], dtype=torch.float32)
loss = weighted_huber_loss(input, target, weights, delta=1.0)
print(loss)
```
---
Feedback on these implementations is welcome; please let me know if further modifications are required.
Resolves#132465
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132049
Approved by: https://github.com/mikaylagawarecki
Co-authored-by: mikaylagawarecki <mikaylagawarecki@gmail.com>
Partially addresses https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/128150
When you have big sums of values, we end up computing long chains of
binary addition in our FX graph representation. Not only is this ugly,
it also is quadratic, as the sympy.Add constructor is O(N) in number
of arguments. Instead, ensure that we maintain the summation as a
single FX node so we can do the entire addition all in one go.
update_hint_regression benchmark, before and after:
```
update_hint_regression,compile_time_instruction_count,2648328980
update_hint_regression,compile_time_instruction_count,2563748678
```
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136429
Approved by: https://github.com/isuruf
Fixes#130154
This PR takes the strategy outlined in the above issue and clears out any cached sizes / strides PyCapsules before serialization. This affects the default subclass serialization logic.
The PyCapsule issue also affects `deepcopy`, so that's fixed here as well.
Note: I originally tried utilizing a context manager to remove / restore cached PyCapsules after serialization, but in practice the state returned from `_reduce_ex_internal()` references the actual `tensor.__dict__()`, so the problem persists once the cached values are restored. Instead, we have to be careful to remove the cached values in the right place so they're not re-cached when pulling out size / stride information for serialization.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137030
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
This diff adds two new operators torch.ops._quantized.wrapped_linear_prepack and torch.ops._quantized.wrapped_quantized_linear_prepacked. It is a decomposition of the op torch.ops._quantized.wrapped_quantized_linear added in the previous diff.
We decomposed in this way as packed weight could be computed early so we don;t need to do it in every forward in AOTI
Reviewed By: jerryzh168
Differential Revision: D61395887
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134232
Approved by: https://github.com/houseroad
