Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
The problem:
- The new CustomOp API depends on torchgen.model
- torchgen.model imports `yaml`
- `yaml` is not a PyTorch runtime dependency
To unblock myself, because I'm not sure how long it'll take to
convince people yaml should be a PyTorch runtime dependency
(unless one of you wants to approve #100166), this PR removes the
yaml dependency from torchgen.model.
It does so by splitting torchgen.utils (the offender) into
torchgen.utils (no yaml) and torchgen.yaml (which uses yaml).
Test Plan:
- CI
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100203
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/Skylion007
I applied some flake8 fixes and enabled checking for them in the linter. I also enabled some checks for my previous comprehensions PR.
This is a follow up to #94323 where I enable the flake8 checkers for the fixes I made and fix a few more of them.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/94601
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Preferring dash over underscore in command-line options. Add `--command-arg-name` to the argument parser. The old arguments with underscores `--command_arg_name` are kept for backward compatibility.
Both dashes and underscores are used in the PyTorch codebase. Some argument parsers only have dashes or only have underscores in arguments. For example, the `torchrun` utility for distributed training only accepts underscore arguments (e.g., `--master_port`). The dashes are more common in other command-line tools. And it looks to be the default choice in the Python standard library:
`argparse.BooleanOptionalAction`: 4a9dff0e5a/Lib/argparse.py (L893-L895)
```python
class BooleanOptionalAction(Action):
def __init__(...):
if option_string.startswith('--'):
option_string = '--no-' + option_string[2:]
_option_strings.append(option_string)
```
It adds `--no-argname`, not `--no_argname`. Also typing `_` need to press the shift or the caps-lock key than `-`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/94505
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/seemethere
Something people found confusing was that whether or not a native::
signature would get SymInt or not in its type was based on the dispatch
key. This changes it so that SymInt or not in type is based on whether
or not you have _symint in the name of the kernel or not. This means
that even when we make operators support SymInt, you no longer have to
go and update all the preexisting definitions; instead, you now
selectively write _symint to opt individual kernels into SymInt support.
I then go and update a bunch of kernels that don't have proper SymInt
support to make use of this convention. There is some hacking around
for view generation code.
I also add support for external backends to specify 'symint' operators, for which we generate SymInt signatures instead of regular signatures.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Differential Revision: [D39310060](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39310060)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84579
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Also Back out "Revert D39075159: [acc_tensor] Use SymIntArrayRef for overloaded empty.memory_format's signature"
Original commit changeset: dab4a9dba4fa
Original commit changeset: dcaf16c037a9
Original Phabricator Diff: D38984222
Original Phabricator Diff: D39075159
Also update Metal registrations for C++ registration changes.
Also update NNPI registration to account for tightened schema checking
Differential Revision: [D39084762](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)
**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Facebook specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)!
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84173
Approved by: https://github.com/Krovatkin
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Summary:
A follow up of #81581. Before these 2 PRs, if an operator with custom kernel namespace is added to `native_functions.yaml` (or any other yaml consumed by `torchgen`), although we are able to recognize the custom kernel in files such as `NativeFunctions.h` and `RegisterCPU.cpp`, we still generate backend specific wrappers under the hardcoded `at` namespace. This changes the behavior, by generating wrapper functions under custom namespaces.
For example, if the entries in yaml file looks like:
```
- func: op_1(Tensor(a) self) -> Tensor(a)
dispatch:
CPU: at::op_1_kernel # ATen kernel
- func: op_2(Tensor(a) self) -> Tensor(a)
dispatch:
CPU: custom::op_2_kernel # custom kernel
```
We generate the following code for `CPUFunctions_inl.h` and `RegisterCPU.cpp`:
`CPUFunctions_inl.h`:
```
namespace at {
namespace cpu {
TORCH_API at::Tensor & op_1(const at::Tensor & self);
} // namespace cpu
} // namespace at
namespace custom {
namespace cpu {
TORCH_API at::Tensor & op_2(const at::Tensor & self);
} // namespace cpu
} // namespace custom
```
Notice the difference between `at::cpu` and `custom::cpu`.
Then the definition for these can be found in `RegisterCPU.cpp`.
`RegisterCPU.cpp`:
```
#include "CPUFunctions.h"
namespace at {
namespace {
at::Tensor & wrapper_op_1(const at::Tensor & self) {
// No device check
// DeviceGuard omitted
return at::native::op_1_kernel(self);
}
} // anonymous namespace
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(aten, CPU, m) {
m.impl("op_1", TORCH_FN(wrapper_op_1));
}
namespace cpu {
at::Tensor & op_1(at::Tensor & self) {
return wrapper_op_1(self);
}
} // namespace cpu
} // namespace at
namespace custom {
namespace {
at::Tensor & wrapper_op_2(const at::Tensor & self) {
// No device check
// DeviceGuard omitted
return at::native::op_2_kernel(self);
}
} // anonymous namespace
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(aten, CPU, m) {
m.impl("op_2", TORCH_FN(wrapper_op_2));
}
namespace cpu {
at::Tensor & op_2(at::Tensor & self) {
return wrapper_op_2(self);
}
} // namespace cpu
} // namespace custom
```
The benefit for this change is that it unifies all the namespaces derived from custom ops. In the example above, there are:
1. `custom::native` for kernels
2. `custom::<dispatch_key>` e.g., `custom::cpu` for wrappers
This customized operator will have nothing to do with `at::native`, `at::cpu` etc.
Test Plan: This is very hard to test. I will refactor this logic, abstract out some layers so it's testable. Will do it in coming PRs
Differential Revision: D37972772
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81744
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
This is to get a conversation started.
* @JackCaoG we could add attributes to items in `ir_codegen` section to customize IR generation logic (e.g. not generating `::Lower`). Though it could be a bit tricky to thread it through.
* Adding an extra argument to `map_codegen` to filter native functions out seems like a step in the right direction. Otherwise, it's a bit confusing how do we go from a full list to a codegen list.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81847
Approved by: https://github.com/JackCaoG, https://github.com/wconstab, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Summary:
Adding a feature to allow user to specify namespaces for operator and kernels.
# Feature
There's a feature request to allow DSL to:
1. take in an operator namespace other than `aten`.
2. take in a kernel that is in a different namespace than `at::native`.
For both features, we only allow user to have a single layer of namespace for the sake of simplicity. If user specify `custom::function` as kernel, the codegen will depend on `custom::native::function` where `native` is hardcoded.
# Proposal
For feature 1, add a `namespace` attribute to data class `NativeFunction`. The namespace will be extract out by matching pattern "::" on the `func` variable. For `NativeFunctionsGroup` there's an assumption that all variants (function, inplace, out) will have the same namespace. By default (if not specified) the namespace will be "aten".
For feature 2, add a `namespace` attribute to `BackendMetadata` class, similarly match pattern "::" on the kernel field. Remove the `cpp_namespace` field from `register_dispatch_key` data class. By default (if not specified) the namespace for a kernel would be "at::native".
Test Plan:
Example yaml entries:
```
- func: custom::gelu.out(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none', Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)
structured: True
structured_inherits: TensorIteratorBase
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
CPU: custom::gelu_out_cpu
CUDA: custom::gelu_out_cuda
MPS: custom::gelu_out_mps
- func: custom::gelu_(Tensor(a!) self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor(a!)
structured_delegate: gelu.out
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
NestedTensorCPU, NestedTensorCUDA: custom::NestedTensor_gelu_
- func: custom::gelu(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor
structured_delegate: gelu.out
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
MkldnnCPU: custom::mkldnn_gelu
QuantizedCPU: custom::gelu_quantized_cpu
NestedTensorCPU, NestedTensorCUDA: custom::NestedTensor_gelu
```
see generated code:
`RegisterCPU.cpp`:
```
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(aten, CPU, m) {
...
}
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(custom, CPU, m) {
m.impl("gelu", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu));
m.impl("gelu.out", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu_out_out));
m.impl("gelu_", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu_));
};
```
```
struct structured_gelu_out_cpu_inplace final : public custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu {
structured_gelu_out_cpu_inplace(Tensor& self) : outputs_{std::ref(self)} {}
void set_output_strided(
int64_t output_idx, IntArrayRef sizes, IntArrayRef strides,
TensorOptions options, DimnameList names
) override {
const auto& out = outputs_[output_idx].get();
check_inplace(out, sizes, options);
auto maybe_proxy = maybe_create_proxy(out, sizes, strides, options);
if (C10_UNLIKELY(maybe_proxy.has_value())) {
proxy_outputs_[output_idx] = c10::ExclusivelyOwned<Tensor>(std::move(maybe_proxy).value());
}
if (!names.empty()) {
namedinference::propagate_names(outputs_[output_idx], names);
}
// super must happen after, so that downstream can use maybe_get_output
// to retrieve the output
custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu::set_output_raw_strided(output_idx, sizes, strides, options, names);
}
void set_output_raw_strided(
int64_t output_idx, IntArrayRef sizes, IntArrayRef strides,
TensorOptions options, DimnameList names
) override {
const auto& out = outputs_[output_idx].get();
check_inplace(out, sizes, options);
if (!names.empty()) {
namedinference::propagate_names(outputs_[output_idx], names);
}
// super must happen after, so that downstream can use maybe_get_output
// to retrieve the output
custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu::set_output_raw_strided(output_idx, sizes, strides, options, names);
}
const Tensor& maybe_get_output(int64_t output_idx) override {
return proxy_outputs_[output_idx].has_value() ? **proxy_outputs_[output_idx] : outputs_[output_idx].get();
}
std::array<std::reference_wrapper<Tensor>, 1> outputs_;
std::array<c10::optional<c10::ExclusivelyOwned<Tensor>>, 1> proxy_outputs_;
};
```
`RegisterSchema.cpp`
```
TORCH_LIBRARY(aten, m) {
...
}
TORCH_LIBRARY(custom, m) {
m.def("gelu.out(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none', Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)");
m.def("gelu_(Tensor(a!) self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor(a!)");
m.def("gelu(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor");
};
```
Differential Revision: D36558459
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78015
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Add codegen infrastructure to generate IR nodes for non-native ops.
The proposed change is to add a `non_native` key to the `{backend}_native_functions.yaml` file that contains schema definitions similar to what is found in `native_functions.yaml`. e.g.
```
non_native:
...
- func: expand(Tensor input, int[] size, bool is_scalar_expand) -> Tensor
...
```
these definitions are parsed into a `LazyIrSchema` that can be used for generating IR nodes using `GenLazyIR`.
Fixes#74628
CC: @wconstab @desertfire @henrytwo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76535
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
