Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
This updates ruff to 0.285 which is faster, better, and have fixes a bunch of false negatives with regards to fstrings.
I also enabled RUF017 which looks for accidental quadratic list summation. Luckily, seems like there are no instances of it in our codebase, so enabling it so that it stays like that. :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107519
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This updates ruff to 0.285 which is faster, better, and have fixes a bunch of false negatives with regards to fstrings.
I also enabled RUF017 which looks for accidental quadratic list summation. Luckily, seems like there are no instances of it in our codebase, so enabling it so that it stays like that. :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107519
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary: per https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/79135 the code
snippets in the docs don't run. This is a recurring problem since
previously there was no unit test to check that these code snippets
actually ran. This PR adds support for such a test, importing the
snippet as a string and evaluating it to make sure that it actually runs
if the code snippet has user defined code, you can pass in dummy
versions using global_inputs. Sometimes the imports of the code snippets
behave oddly but you can pass them in as in test_quantization_doc_custom
where nnq is passed in.
Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizationDocs
also see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/79994 to see what shows up in CI when the docs get broken
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/79923
Approved by: https://github.com/z-a-f, https://github.com/vspenubarthi
