# Motivation
Before this PR, device construction was `cuda` type when only a device index was given. It also returns the `PrivateUser1` type if a `PrivateUser1` type is registered.
```bash
>>> import torch
>>> device = torch.device(0)
>>> device.type
'cuda'
>>> a = torch.tensor([1, 2])
>>> b = a.to(0)
>>> b
tensor([1, 2], device='cuda:0')
```
It works well on CUDA GPU. But it will raise unexpected information and error running on XPU.
```bash
>>> import torch
>>> device = torch.device(0)
>>> device.type
'cuda'
>>> a = torch.tensor([1, 2])
>>> b = a.to(0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/xxx/pytorch/torch/cuda/__init__.py", line 302, in _lazy_init
raise AssertionError("Torch not compiled with CUDA enabled")
AssertionError: Torch not compiled with CUDA enabled
```
With this PR, refine the logic to use the currently available device type instead.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129119
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/EikanWang
ghstack dependencies: #129463, #129205, #129363
Summary:
`-Wunused-exception-parameter` has identified an unused exception parameter. This diff removes it.
This:
```
try {
...
} catch (exception& e) {
// no use of e
}
```
should instead be written as
```
} catch (exception&) {
```
If the code compiles, this is safe to land.
Test Plan: Sandcastle
Reviewed By: palmje
Differential Revision: D55548497
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123056
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Fixes#115331.
This PR increases the number of valid GPU devices to 512 (from 64) in order to future-proof PyTorch for providers that offer [single nodes with a large device count](https://www.tensorwave.com/). Until now, `DeviceIndex` was an `int8_t`, thus multiple changes were necessary:
- `DeviceIndex` changed to `int16_t`. Updated consumers that assume it to be an `int8_t`.
- Updated bounds checking for `torch.device()` in the Python frontend. Right now, we allow funny things like `torch.device('cpu', 200).index == -56`, which is undefined behavior. I inserted some checks to only allow values between 0 and `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES - 1`.
- Updated the `ArgumentInfo` struct as it hardcodes the device index as 8 bit field [^1]. Might be a breaking change, not sure if users rely on this.
- Introduced `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES` as a replacement for the old `C10_COMPILE_TIME_MAX_GPUS`
[^1]: This field was unsigned, so I guess this has also been undef behavior the whole time? Our default device index is -1, so this always wrapped around to 255 when written to the `ArgumentInfo` struct. When I switched the `DeviceIndex` to `int16_t`, it actually stayed 255 after unpacking from `ArgumentInfo` again, as the `DeviceIndex` was now wide enough that it didn't wrap back to -1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119639
Approved by: https://github.com/cyyever, https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/huydhn
Fixes#115331.
This PR increases the number of valid GPU devices to 512 (from 64) in order to future-proof PyTorch for providers that offer [single nodes with a large device count](https://www.tensorwave.com/). Until now, `DeviceIndex` was an `int8_t`, thus multiple changes were necessary:
- `DeviceIndex` changed to `int16_t`. Updated consumers that assume it to be an `int8_t`.
- Updated bounds checking for `torch.device()` in the Python frontend. Right now, we allow funny things like `torch.device('cpu', 200).index == -56`, which is undefined behavior. I inserted some checks to only allow values between 0 and `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES - 1`.
- Updated the `ArgumentInfo` struct as it hardcodes the device index as 8 bit field [^1]. Might be a breaking change, not sure if users rely on this.
- Introduced `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES` as a replacement for the old `C10_COMPILE_TIME_MAX_GPUS`
[^1]: This field was unsigned, so I guess this has also been undef behavior the whole time? Our default device index is -1, so this always wrapped around to 255 when written to the `ArgumentInfo` struct. When I switched the `DeviceIndex` to `int16_t`, it actually stayed 255 after unpacking from `ArgumentInfo` again, as the `DeviceIndex` was now wide enough that it didn't wrap back to -1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119639
Approved by: https://github.com/cyyever, https://github.com/albanD
We can use `__index__` to do this conversion because that will trigger a
guard on data dependent SymInt if the tensor is a fake tensor, but if
we fetch item directly and put it in the Scalar, we may still be able to
make it work out.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117454
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
ghstack dependencies: #117451, #117452
This fastpath is unnecessary because in the logic below we
do the same thing:
```
auto& var = THPVariable_Unpack(obj);
if (var.numel() != 1 ||
!at::isIntegralType(
var.dtype().toScalarType(), /*include_bool*/ true)) {
throw_intlist_exception(this, i, obj, idx);
}
auto scalar = var.item();
TORCH_CHECK(scalar.isIntegral(/*include bool*/ false));
res.push_back(scalar.toSymInt())
```
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117452
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
ghstack dependencies: #117451
This PR stops `SymNode` from mutating (i.e. simplifying) its expression. Instead, the
simplification (without mutation) is deferred to the `SymNode.maybe_as_int` method.
```python
- FakeTensor(size=(s0,), ...)
- FakeTensor(size=(s1, s2, s3), ...)
- Eq(s0, s1 + s2 + s3)
- FakeTensor(size=(s0,), ...)
- FakeTensor(size=(s1, s2, s3), ...)
```
In summary, this PR:
- Replaces `SymNode._expr` by `SymNode.expr`, removing the old property function
- This makes it so `SymNode` instances never update their expression
- Creates `SymNode.simplified_expr()` method for actually calling `ShapeEnv.replace` on
its expression. Note that this doesn't updates `SymNode.expr`
- Changes how `tensor.size()` gets converted to its Python `torch.Size` type
- Instead of calling `SymInt::maybe_as_int()` method, we create a new
`SymInt::is_symbolic()` method for checking whether it is actually a symbolic value
- This is needed so that when we call `tensor.size()` in the Python side, the returned
sequence is faithful to the actual data, instead of possibly simplifying it and
returning an integer
- 2 files needs this modification:
- _torch/csrc/Size.cpp_: for handling `torch.Tensor.size` Python calls
- _torch/csrc/utils/pybind.cpp_: for handling `symint.cast()` C++ calls
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107492
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
ghstack dependencies: #107523
This moves the `overloaded_args` field from FunctionSignature to PythonArgs. FunctionSignature is shared by all calls and should be immutable. PythonArgs contains the parsing results for an single call to the PyTorch API.
I did not measure a difference in performance in the "overrides_benchmark", although I expect there to be a bit more work in the common case. Note that the noise factor for the benchmark is much larger than the differences reported below:
Before:
```
Type tensor had a minimum time of 2.3615360260009766 us and a standard deviation of 0.7833134150132537 us.
Type SubTensor had a minimum time of 10.473251342773438 us and a standard deviation of 0.1973132457351312 us.
Type WithTorchFunction had a minimum time of 5.484819412231445 us and a standard deviation of 0.13305981701705605 us.
Type SubWithTorchFunction had a minimum time of 11.098146438598633 us and a standard deviation of 0.15598918253090233 us.
```
After:
```
Type tensor had a minimum time of 2.2134780883789062 us and a standard deviation of 0.802064489107579 us.
Type SubTensor had a minimum time of 10.625839233398438 us and a standard deviation of 0.15155907021835446 us.
Type WithTorchFunction had a minimum time of 5.520820617675781 us and a standard deviation of 0.23115111980587244 us.
Type SubWithTorchFunction had a minimum time of 11.227846145629883 us and a standard deviation of 0.23032321769278497 us.
```
Fixes#106974
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106983
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519, https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#91338
Follow up from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/91342
> 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch
> We have an existing DeviceType class all over the place in our code base, and it conflicts with the one that is used in torch. > Thankfully the pytorch DeciceType enum class is under the c10 namespace.
```
In file included from /xxx/build/_deps/torch-src/../../aten/src/ATen/ops/view.h:5:
/xxx/_deps/torch-src/aten/src/ATen/Context.h:265:14: error: reference to 'DeviceType' is ambiguous
if (p == DeviceType::HIP) {
^
/xxx/include/Common_types.h:178:8: note: candidate found by name lookup is 'DeviceType'
struct DeviceType {
^
/xxx/build/_deps/torch-src/c10/../c10/core/DeviceType.h:32:12: note: candidate found by name lookup is 'c10::DeviceType'
enum class DeviceType : int8_t {
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/104364
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
before the PR, when compiling a function with signature symint/symintlist/intlist, we have runtime error like ```argument 'shifts' must be tuple of ints, not FakeTensor```. see newly added unit test in test/dynamo/test_misc.py for repro
after the PR, for FakeTensor with empty size and numel()=1, we will try
to convert it into symint/symintlist. we will likely see expected
exception
```torch._subclasses.fake_tensor.DataDependentOutputException / aten._local_scalar_dense.default``` during conversion
reference PR:
* we handle FakeTensor for symintlist as 1st varags: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97508
* we handle FakeTensor for intlist in a similar way:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/85759/files
* call local_scalar_dense on a FakeTensor:
f7365eca90
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103448
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
Failing mechanism on #95424 :
In dynamo mode, when passing numpy.int_ to 'shape' like param (Sequence[Union[int, symint]]) is wrapped as list with FakeTensor. However, in python_arg_parser, parser expect int in symint_list but got FakeTensor.
Following #85759, this PR allow tensor element in symint_list when in dynamo mode
This PR also fix below test with similar failing mechanism
pytest ./generated/test_huggingface_diffusers.py -k test_016
pytest ./generated/test_ustcml_RecStudio.py -k test_036
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97508
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
This fixes compiling on systems where `size_t` is an `unsigned int` instead of an `unsigned long int` (32 bit Raspberry Pi OS is one example).
`%ld` expects an `unsigned long int`, while `%zu` specifies that it's an unsigned size_t.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/101412
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
The strategy is that we will heap allocate a LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl whenever we have a large negative int, so that we can keep the old `is_symbolic` test (now called `is_heap_allocated`) on SymInt. Whenever we need to do something with these ints, though, we convert them back into a plain `int64_t` (and then, e.g., wrap it in whatever user specificed SymNodeImpl they need.) We cannot wrap directly in the user specified SymNodeImpl as we generally do not know what the "tracing context" is from C++. We expect large negative ints to be rare, so we don't apply optimizations like singleton-ifying INT_MIN. Here's the order to review:
* c10/core/SymInt.h and cpp
* `is_symbolic` renamed to `is_heap_allocated` as I needed to audit all use sites: the old `is_symbolic` test would return true for large negative int, but it would be wrong to then try to dispatch on the LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl which supports very few operations. In this file, I had to update expect_int,
* If you pass in a large negative integer, we instead heap allocate it in `promote_to_negative`. The function is written in a funny way to keep compact constructor code for SymInt (the heap allocation happens out of line)
* clone is now moved out-of-line
* New method maybe_as_int which will give you a constant int if it is possible, either because it's stored inline or in LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl. This is the preferred replacement for previous use of is_symbolic() and then as_int_unchecked().
* Rename toSymNodeImpl to toSymNode, which is more correct (since it returns a SymNode)
* Complete rewrite of `normalize_symints.cpp` to use new `maybe_as_int`. Cannot easily use the old code structure, so it's now done doing a macro and typing out each case manually (it's actually not that bad.)
* Reimplementations of all the unary operators by hand to use `maybe_as_int`, relatively simple.
* c10/core/LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl.h - Just stores a int64_t value, but it has to be big and negative. Most methods are not implemented, since we will rewrap the large negative int in the real SymNodeImpl subclass before doing operations with it
* The rest of the files are just rewriting code to use `maybe_as_int`. There is a nontrivial comment in c10/core/SymIntArrayRef.h
Very minor test adjustment in c10/test/core/SymInt_test.cpp . Plan to exercise this properly in next PR.
Companion XLA PR: https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/4882
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99157
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
