Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74226
Update signature of `scatter_reduce_` to match `scatter_/scatter_add_`
`Tensor.scatter_reduce_(int64 dim, Tensor index, Tensor src, str reduce)`
- Add new reduction options in ScatterGatherKernel.cpp and update `scatter_reduce` to call into the cpu kernel for `scatter.reduce`
- `scatter_reduce` now has the same shape constraints as `scatter_` and `scatter_add_`
- Migrate `test/test_torch.py:test_scatter_reduce` to `test/test_scatter_gather_ops.py`
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D35222842
Pulled By: mikaylagawarecki
fbshipit-source-id: 84930add2ad30baf872c495251373313cb7428bd
(cherry picked from commit 1b45139482e22eb0dc8b6aec2a7b25a4b58e31df)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/65908
Added a new overload instead of updating the current signature. (Had issues with JIT and **maybe** it would have been FC breaking)
TODO:
* [x] Don't compute `std::pow(10, decimals)` for each element.
* [x] Update docs (https://docs-preview.pytorch.org/66195/generated/torch.round.html?highlight=round#torch.round)
* [x] Add tests
* ~~Should we try to make it composite?~~
* ~~Should we add specialized test with more values of `decimals` outside of OpInfo with larger range of values in input tensor?~~
cc mruberry rgommers
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66195
Reviewed By: anjali411
Differential Revision: D31821385
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 9a03fcb809440f0c83530108284e69c345e1850f
(cherry picked from commit 50b67c696880b8dcfc42796956b4780b83bf7a7e)
Summary:
Hi, PyTorch Team!
I am very much interested in starting up my contribution to PyTorch. I made several contributions in NumPy and CuPy, but this is my first PR towards PyTorch. I aim to contribute more in the upcoming future.
The PR fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/70972https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/70975.
#### Aim of PR
The functions like `Tensor.ravel`, `Tensor.tril`, `Tensor.tril_`, `Tensor.triu`, and `Tensor.triu_` had a couple of typos in docs. The PR aims to resolve that.
I'm looking forward to your viewpoints. Thanks!
cc: kshitij12345 vadimkantorov Lezcano TestSomething22
cc brianjo mruberry
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71057
Reviewed By: preeti1205
Differential Revision: D33502911
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 8ce0b68a29658a5a0be79bc807dfa7d71653532d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/65993
This PR attempts to port `index_add` to structured kernels, but does more than that:
* Adds an `out=` variant to `index_add`
* Revises `native_functions.yaml` registrations, to not have multiple entries and instead pass default value to `alpha`.
* Changes in `derivatives.yaml` file for autograd functioning
* Revises error messages, please see: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/65993#issuecomment-945441615
Follow-up PRs in near future will attempt to refactor the OpInfo test, and will give another look at tests in `test/test_torch.py` for this function. (hence the use of ghstack for this)
~This is WIP because there are tests failing for `Dimname` variant on mobile/android builds, and I'm working on fixing them.~
Issue tracker: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/55070
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D32646426
fbshipit-source-id: b035ecf843a9a27d4d1e18b202b035adc2a49ab5
Summary:
### Create `linalg.cross`
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/62810
As discussed in the corresponding issue, this PR adds `cross` to the `linalg` namespace (**Note**: There is no method variant) which is slightly different in behaviour compared to `torch.cross`.
**Note**: this is NOT an alias as suggested in mruberry's [https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/62810 comment](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/62810#issuecomment-897504372) below
> linalg.cross being consistent with the Python Array API (over NumPy) makes sense because NumPy has no linalg.cross. I also think we can implement linalg.cross without immediately deprecating torch.cross, although we should definitely refer users to linalg.cross. Deprecating torch.cross will require additional review. While it's not used often it is used, and it's unclear if users are relying on its unique behavior or not.
The current default implementation of `torch.cross` is extremely weird and confusing. This has also been reported multiple times previously. (See https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/17229, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/39310, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/41850, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/50273)
- [x] Add `torch.linalg.cross` with default `dim=-1`
- [x] Add OpInfo and other tests for `torch.linalg.cross`
- [x] Add broadcasting support to `torch.cross` and `torch.linalg.cross`
- [x] Remove out skip from `torch.cross` OpInfo
- [x] Add docs for `torch.linalg.cross`. Improve docs for `torch.cross` mentioning `linalg.cross` and the difference between the two. Also adds a warning to `torch.cross`, that it may change in the future (we might want to deprecate it later)
---
### Additional Fixes to `torch.cross`
- [x] Fix Doc for Tensor.cross
- [x] Fix torch.cross in `torch/overridres.py`
While working on `linalg.cross` I noticed these small issues with `torch.cross` itself.
[Tensor.cross docs](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.Tensor.cross.html) still mentions `dim=-1` default which is actually wrong. It should be `dim=None` after the behaviour was updated in PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/17582 but the documentation for the `method` or `function` variant wasn’t updated. Later PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/41850 updated the documentation for the `function` variant i.e `torch.cross` and also added the following warning about the weird behaviour.
> If `dim` is not given, it defaults to the first dimension found with the size 3. Note that this might be unexpected.
But still, the `Tensor.cross` docs were missed and remained outdated. I’m finally fixing that here. Also fixing `torch/overrides.py` for `torch.cross` as well now, with `dim=None`.
To verify according to the docs the default behaviour of `dim=-1` should raise, you can try the following.
```python
a = torch.randn(3, 4)
b = torch.randn(3, 4)
b.cross(a) # this works because the implementation finds 3 in the first dimension and the default behaviour as shown in documentation is actually not true.
>>> tensor([[ 0.7171, -1.1059, 0.4162, 1.3026],
[ 0.4320, -2.1591, -1.1423, 1.2314],
[-0.6034, -1.6592, -0.8016, 1.6467]])
b.cross(a, dim=-1) # this raises as expected since the last dimension doesn't have a 3
>>> RuntimeError: dimension -1 does not have size 3
```
Please take a closer look (particularly the autograd part, this is the first time I'm dealing with `derivatives.yaml`). If there is something missing, wrong or needs more explanation, please let me know. Looking forward to the feedback.
cc mruberry Lezcano IvanYashchuk rgommers
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63285
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D32313346
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: e68c2687c57367274e8ddb7ef28ee92dcd4c9f2c
Summary:
Adds `torch.argwhere` as an alias to `torch.nonzero`
Currently, `torch.nonzero` is actually provides equivalent functionality to `np.argwhere`.
From NumPy docs,
> np.argwhere(a) is almost the same as np.transpose(np.nonzero(a)), but produces a result of the correct shape for a 0D array.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64257
Reviewed By: qihqi
Differential Revision: D32049884
Pulled By: saketh-are
fbshipit-source-id: 016e49884698daa53b83e384435c3f8f6b5bf6bb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64430
The functionalization pass needs `{view}_scatter` versions of the slice/select/diagonal ops in order to correctly propagate mutations from a view to its base. On top of that, the implementations need to be primitive w.r.t. autograd, because they look something like `...slice().copy_()`, and the functionalization pass can't use views + mutations inside of it's own alias-removal machinery!
I added some basic tests that I tried to base off of existing tests for views (particularly around testing the derivative formulas), but I'm wondering if I should add something more comprehensive.
Also, as_strided fits into this category - the functionalization pass will need an `as_strided_scatter` op that's primitive w.r.t. autograd. I didn't add it for now, because it'll involve duplicating a bunch of logic from the current `as_strided_backward()` function, and also writing a derivative formula that I wasn't sure how to write :)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D31942092
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: c702a57c2748a7c771c14e4bcc3e996b48fcc4c8
Summary:
Adds `torch.argwhere` as an alias to `torch.nonzero`
Currently, `torch.nonzero` is actually provides equivalent functionality to `np.argwhere`.
From NumPy docs,
> np.argwhere(a) is almost the same as np.transpose(np.nonzero(a)), but produces a result of the correct shape for a 0D array.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64257
Reviewed By: dagitses
Differential Revision: D31474901
Pulled By: saketh-are
fbshipit-source-id: 335327a4986fa327da74e1fb8624cc1e56959c70
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64180
**BC-breaking note:**
This PR deprecates the `Tensor.T` are not matrices. An upgrade guide is added to the
documentation for `Tensor.T`.
This PR DOES NOT make this attribute to throw an error when called on a tensor of `dim != 2`,
but this will be its behavior in a future PyTorch release.
cc mruberry rgommers pmeier asmeurer leofang AnirudhDagar asi1024 emcastillo kmaehashi heitorschueroff
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D31610611
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: af8ff7e862790dda9f06921de005b3f6fd0803c3
Summary:
Hi, I'm looking forward to contributing to PyTorch, so starting with a minor fix in the documentation for `index_add`.
Currently, in the documentation for `index_add_` (please see https://pytorch.org/docs/master/generated/torch.Tensor.index_add_.html#torch.Tensor.index_add_):
1. `tensor` attribute was pointing to `torch.tensor` class, which IMO - is (thought may not be a big deal) unintentional.
2. `dim` attribute is pointing to `torch.Tensor.dim`, which again IMO - is unintentional.
This PR suggests a correction for the first point above, to rename `tensor` attribute to `input` so that it doesn't point to `torch.tensor` class. (I've verified that others ops like `scatter` use `input`, so this should not break the consistency in the documentation). I couldn't find an appropriate fix for the second point above, since renaming `dim` to something else will break the consistency (as almost all others op in PyTorch use `dim` as the attribute name).
I may be wrong here, so please let me know if there is any feedback or an alternate fix for this.
_Note:_ I plan to fix this behavior for `index_copy_` (https://pytorch.org/docs/master/generated/torch.Tensor.index_copy_.html#torch.Tensor.index_copy_) once and if this PR is approved.
To the reviewers, please help me tag the correct person who could help review this PR.
cc: krshrimali mruberry zou3519
cc brianjo mruberry
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/65806
Reviewed By: dagitses, mruberry
Differential Revision: D31431182
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 66ced9677ac3bc71d672d13366f9f567ecea0a2d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/62030
Remove dtype tracking from Python Storage interface, remove all the different `<type>Storage` classes except for `ByteStorage`, and update serialization accordingly, while maintaining as much FC/BC as possible
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/47442
* **THE SERIALIZATION FORMAT IS FULLY FC/BC.** We worked very hard to make sure this is the case. We will probably want to break FC at some point to make the serialization structure of tensors make more sense, but not today.
* There is now only a single torch.ByteStorage class. Methods like `Tensor.set_` no longer check that the dtype of storage is appropriate.
* As we no longer know what dtype of a storage is, we've **removed** the size method from Storage, replacing it with nbytes. This is to help catch otherwise silent errors where you confuse number of elements with number of bytes.
* `Storage._new_shared` takes a `nbytes` kwarg and will reject previous positional only calls. `Storage._new_with_file` and `_set_from_file` require explicit element size arguments.
* It's no longer possible to convert storages to different types using the float/double/etc methods. Instead, do the conversion using a tensor.
* It's no longer possible to allocate a typed storage directly using FloatStorage/DoubleStorage/etc constructors. Instead, construct a tensor and extract its storage. The classes still exist but they are used purely for unpickling.
* The preexisting serialization format stores dtype with storage, and in fact this dtype is used to determine the dtype of the tensor overall.
To accommodate this case, we introduce a new TypedStorage concept that exists only during unpickling time which is used to temporarily store the dtype so we can construct a tensor. **If you overrode the handling of pickling/unpickling, you MUST add handling for TypedStorage** or your serialization code will degrade to standard file-based serialization.
Original pull request: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59671
Reviewed By: soulitzer, ngimel
Differential Revision: D29466819
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 4a14e5d3c2b08e06e558683d97f7378a3180b00e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/62671
Very crude first implementation of `torch.nanmean`. The current reduction kernels do not have good support for implementing nan* variants. Rather than implementing new kernels for each nan* operator, I will work on new reduction kernels with support for a `nan_policy` flag and then I will port `nanmean` to use that.
**TODO**
- [x] Fix autograd issue
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: malfet
Differential Revision: D30515181
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: 303004ebd7ac9cf963dc4f8e2553eaded5f013f0
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63180
**Summary**
This commit removes the `input` parameter from the signature for
`Tensor.flatten` shown in its documentation. This parameter is accepted
by `torch.flatten` but not `Tensor.flatten` (since the input is the
`Tensor` on which `flatten` is invoked).
**Test Plan**
Continuous integration.
**Fixes**
This commit fixes#57478.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D30293156
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 4ad70d638af009fb6bdeb703433b306904d39a76
Summary:
Sphinx 4.x is out, but it seems that requires many more changes to
adopt. So instead use the latest version of 3.x, which includes
several nice features.
* Add some noindex directives to deal with warnings that would otherwise
be triggered by this change due to conflicts between the docstrings
declaring a function and the autodoc extension declaring the
same function.
* Update distributions.utils.lazy_property to make it look like a
regular property when sphinx autodoc inspects classes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61601
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D29801876
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 544d2434a15ceb77bff236e934dbd8e4dbd9d160
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56058
User facing changes:
1. Adds a negative bit and corresponding new API (`is_neg()`,`resolve_neg()`)
2. `tensor.conj().imag` now returns a floating point tensor with neg bit set to 1 instead of a tensor with no notion of negative bit. Note that imag is still a view and all the view properties still hold for imag.
Non user facing changes:
1. Added a new Negative dispatch key and a backend fallback to handle it
2. Updated copy kernel to handle negative bit
3. Merged conjugate and negative bit fallback kernel
4. fixed https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/60478 (caused due to https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54987)
Testing:
1. Added a new OpInfo based test `test_neg_view` (verifies that out-of-place and in-place operations work correctly for all operations when the input is a neg view tensor by checking the result against an actually negated tensor, verifies that autograd returns the same output for both neg view and actually negated tensors as well as it works fine when grad_out is a neg view).
2. Added a new test class containing `test_conj_view`, `test_neg_view`.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: soulitzer
Differential Revision: D29636403
fbshipit-source-id: 12214c9dc4806c51850f4a72a109db9527c0ca63
Summary:
Based from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50466
Adds the initial implementation of `torch.cov` similar to `numpy.cov`. For simplicity, we removed support for many parameters in `numpy.cov` that are either redundant such as `bias`, or have simple workarounds such as `y` and `rowvar`.
cc PandaBoi
closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/19037
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58311
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D29431651
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: 167dea880f534934b145ba94291a9d634c25b01b
Summary:
There is a very common error when writing docs: One forgets to write a matching `` ` ``, and something like ``:attr:`x`` is rendered in the docs. This PR fixes most (all?) of these errors (and a few others).
I found these running ``grep -r ">[^#<][^<]*\`"`` on the `docs/build/html/generated` folder. The regex finds an HTML tag that does not start with `#` (as python comments in example code may contain backticks) and that contains a backtick in the rendered HTML.
This regex has not given any false positive in the current codebase, so I am inclined to suggest that we should add this check to the CI. Would this be possible / reasonable / easy to do malfet ?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60474
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D29309633
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 9621e0e9f87590cea060dd084fa367442b6bd046
Summary:
Based from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50466
Adds the initial implementation of `torch.cov` similar to `numpy.cov`. For simplicity, we removed support for many parameters in `numpy.cov` that are either redundant such as `bias`, or have simple workarounds such as `y` and `rowvar`.
cc PandaBoi
TODO
- [x] Improve documentation
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58311
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D28994140
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: 1890166c0a9c01e0a536acd91571cd704d632f44
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/35379
- Adds `retains_grad` attribute backed by cpp as a native function. The python bindings for the function are skipped to be consistent with `is_leaf`.
- Tried writing it without native function, but the jit test `test_tensor_properties` seems to require that it be a native function (or alternatively maybe it could also work if we manually add a prim implementation?).
- Python API now uses `retain_grad` implementation from cpp
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59362
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D28969298
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 335f2be50b9fb870cd35dc72f7dadd6c8666cc02
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54987
Based off of ezyang (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44799) and bdhirsh (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43702) 's prototype:
Here's a summary of the changes in this PR:
This PR adds a new dispatch key called Conjugate. This enables us to make conjugate operation a view and leverage the specialized library functions that fast path with the hermitian operation (conj + transpose).
1. Conjugate operation will now return a view with conj bit (1) for complex tensors and returns self for non-complex tensors as before. This also means `torch.view_as_real` will no longer be a view on conjugated complex tensors and is hence disabled. To fill the gap, we have added `torch.view_as_real_physical` which would return the real tensor agnostic of the conjugate bit on the input complex tensor. The information about conjugation on the old tensor can be obtained by calling `.is_conj()` on the new tensor.
2. NEW API:
a) `.conj()` -- now returning a view.
b) `.conj_physical()` -- does the physical conjugate operation. If the conj bit for input was set, you'd get `self.clone()`, else you'll get a new tensor with conjugated value in its memory.
c) `.conj_physical_()`, and `out=` variant
d) `.resolve_conj()` -- materializes the conjugation. returns self if the conj bit is unset, else returns a new tensor with conjugated values and conj bit set to 0.
e) `.resolve_conj_()` in-place version of (d)
f) `view_as_real_physical` -- as described in (1), it's functionally same as `view_as_real`, just that it doesn't error out on conjugated tensors.
g) `view_as_real` -- existing function, but now errors out on conjugated tensors.
3. Conjugate Fallback
a) Vast majority of PyTorch functions would currently use this fallback when they are called on a conjugated tensor.
b) This fallback is well equipped to handle the following cases:
- functional operation e.g., `torch.sin(input)`
- Mutable inputs and in-place operations e.g., `tensor.add_(2)`
- out-of-place operation e.g., `torch.sin(input, out=out)`
- Tensorlist input args
- NOTE: Meta tensors don't work with conjugate fallback.
4. Autograd
a) `resolve_conj()` is an identity function w.r.t. autograd
b) Everything else works as expected.
5. Testing:
a) All method_tests run with conjugate view tensors.
b) OpInfo tests that run with conjugate views
- test_variant_consistency_eager/jit
- gradcheck, gradgradcheck
- test_conj_views (that only run for `torch.cfloat` dtype)
NOTE: functions like `empty_like`, `zero_like`, `randn_like`, `clone` don't propagate the conjugate bit.
Follow up work:
1. conjugate view RFC
2. Add neg bit to re-enable view operation on conjugated tensors
3. Update linalg functions to call into specialized functions that fast path with the hermitian operation.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D28227315
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: acab9402b9d6a970c6d512809b627a290c8def5f
Summary:
Adds `is_inference` as a native function w/ manual cpp bindings.
Also changes instances of `is_inference_tensor` to `is_inference` to be consistent with other properties such as `is_complex`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58729
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D28874507
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 0fa6bcdc72a4ae444705e2e0f3c416c1b28dadc7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58881
recently added new parameter to the function with PR: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58417
However, this introduced ambiguity when making call below:
some_tensor.repeat_interleave(some_integer_value)
Making it optional to avoid the issue.
Reviewed By: ezyang, ngimel
Differential Revision: D28653820
fbshipit-source-id: 5bc0b1f326f069ff505554b51e3b24d60e69c843
Summary:
This adds the methods `Tensor.cfloat()` and `Tensor.cdouble()`.
I was not able to find the tests for `.float()` functions. I'd be happy to add similar tests for these functions once someone points me to them.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/56014
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58137
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D28412288
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: ff3653cb3516bcb3d26a97b9ec3d314f1f42f83d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50903
First part of #50010. Also fixes#51127.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D27911345
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 7138fddc935802918ab9ff19f4bc1b9f4d745d41
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/54555
It has been discussed in the issue https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/54555 that {h,v,d}split methods unexpectedly matches argument of single int[] when it is expected to match single argument of int. The same unexpected behavior can happen in other functions/methods which can take both int[] and int? as single argument signatures.
In this PR we solve this problem by giving higher priority to int/int? arguments over int[] while sorting signatures.
We also add methods of {h,v,d}split methods here, which helped us to discover this unexpected behavior.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57346
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D28121234
Pulled By: iramazanli
fbshipit-source-id: 851cf40b370707be89298177b51ceb4527f4b2d6
