Bug:
Previously, `initOutputLayouts()` was called after creating a graph and before merging other nodes. It is a vector with one element. So when a graph contains multiple outputs, e.g. using AOTAutograd compile in my case, layout_propagation pass try to access out of range elements in the vector. Then it comes to the second bug in `useOpaqueLayout()`, the out of range checks the index with the updated output size instead of the size of the vector. Then used `[]` to access the element, which is out of range.
Fixes the above two issues:
1. check the offset is within range with the size of `attr::output_layouts` vector instead of another variable. This check catches the error now.
2. change the place to initial `attr::output_layouts` after node merging. The graph may change with node merging. Thus we moved the initialization in layout_propagation with the complete graph.
Added test time:
`Ran 1 test in 0.383s`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/88496
Approved by: https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/sanchitintel
Re-landing #68111/#74596
## Description
v0.5 PR of this [RFC](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49444).
On the basis of #50256, the below improvements are included:
* The [v0.5 release branch](https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/releases/tag/graph-v0.5) of the oneDNN Graph API is used
* The fuser now works with the profiling graph executor. We have inserted type check nodes to guard the profiled tensor properties.
### User API:
The optimization pass is disabled by default. Users could enable it by:
```
torch.jit.enable_onednn_fusion(True)
```
`torch.jit.freeze` should be used after tracing (recommended) or scripting a model.
### Performance:
[pytorch/benchmark](https://github.com/pytorch/benchmark) tool is used to compare the performance:
* SkyLake 8180 (1 socket of 28 cores):
* SkyLake 8180 (single thread):
* By mapping hardswish to oneDNN Graph, it’s 8% faster than PyTorch JIT (NNC + OFI)
** We expect performance gain after mapping transpose, contiguous & view to oneDNN graph ops
### Directory structure of the integration code
Fuser-related code is placed under:
```
torch/csrc/jit/codegen/onednn/
```
Optimization pass registration is done in:
```
torch/csrc/jit/passes/onednn_graph_fuser.h
```
CMake for the integration code is in:
```
caffe2/CMakeLists.txt
cmake/public/mkldnn.cmake
cmake/Modules/FindMKLDNN.cmake
```
## Limitations
* In this PR, we only support Pytorch-oneDNN-Graph integration on Linux platform. Support on Windows and MacOS will be enabled as a next step.
* We have only optimized the inference use-case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76622
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Summary:
## Description
Preview4 PR of this [RFC](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49444).
On the basis of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50256, the below improvements are included:
- The [preview4 release branch](https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/releases/tag/graph-v0.4.1) of the oneDNN Graph API is used
- The fuser now works with the profiling graph executor. We have inserted type check nodes to guard the profiled tensor properties.
### User API:
The optimization pass is disabled by default. Users could enable it by:
```
torch.jit.enable_onednn_fusion(True)
```
### Performance:
[pytorch/benchmark](https://github.com/pytorch/benchmark) tool is used to compare the performance:
- SkyLake 8180 (1 socket of 28 cores):
- SkyLake 8180 (single thread):
\* By mapping hardswish to oneDNN Graph, it’s 8% faster than PyTorch JIT (NNC + OFI)
\** We expect performance gain after mapping transpose, contiguous & view to oneDNN graph ops
### Directory structure of the integration code
Fuser-related code are placed under:
```
torch/csrc/jit/codegen/onednn/
```
Optimization pass registration is done in:
```
torch/csrc/jit/passes/onednn_graph_fuser.h
```
CMake for the integration code is:
```
caffe2/CMakeLists.txt
```
## Limitations
- In this PR, we have only supported the optimization on Linux platform. The support on Windows and MacOS will be enabled as the next step.
- We have only optimized the inference use case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/68111
Reviewed By: eellison
Differential Revision: D34584878
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: ce817aa8cc9052ee9ed930c9cf66be83449e61a4
(cherry picked from commit cd17683aa7d9c0947df45a1ab53627feff795587)
