Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34515
Once upon a time we thought this was necessary. In reality it is not, so
removing it.
For backcompat, our public interface (defined in `api/`) still has
typedefs to the old `script::` names.
There was only one collision: `Pass` as a `Stmt` and `Pass` as a graph
transform. I renamed one of them.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20353503
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: 48bb911ce75120a8c9e0c6fb65262ef775dfba93
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33732
move and forward instead of copy
Benchmarks:
A microbenchmark calling the add operation on two tensors in a tight loop shows a 5% improvement in performance.
No visible change for a model like resnet that does more work in its kernels.
ghstack-source-id: 99161486
Test Plan: benchmarks
Differential Revision: D20082642
fbshipit-source-id: eeac59686f8621dd5eaa85d61e6d219bba48c847
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30915
Since we now have C++14, we don't need these c10::guts helpers anymore
ghstack-source-id: 95777609
Test Plan: waitforsandcastle
Differential Revision: D18869639
fbshipit-source-id: 97716f932297c64c6e814410ac47b444c33d4e2e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28800
Fix up namespaces and make friendly error message when registered class doesn't inherit from the right base
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D18175067
Pulled By: jamesr66a
fbshipit-source-id: 5c7cf3a49fb45db502d84eb3f9a69be126ee59fb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/23689
We store methods, no reason to try to lock the CU to find a method on a
class type
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D16610045
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: d84ad81faa42c4e2da20b666fa3645e22f11dac3
Summary:
I have some test code in there as well, along with a script "test_libtorch" to run it. You'll need to modify `test_libtorch` to point to where you have `pytorch` built. I currently require that `pybind11` is included as a subdirectory of the test, but added it to the `.gitignore` to make this reviewable.
Currently, something like this works:
```cpp
struct Foo {
int x, y;
Foo(): x(2), y(5){}
Foo(int x_, int y_) : x(x_), y(y_) {}
void display() {
cout<<"x: "<<x<<' '<<"y: "<<y<<endl;
}
int64_t add(int64_t z) {
return (x+y)*z;
}
};
static auto test = torch::jit::class_<Foo>("Foo")
.def(torch::jit::init<int64_t, int64_t>())
.def("display", &Foo::display)
.def("add", &Foo::add)
.def("combine", &Foo::combine);
```
with
```py
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
val.display()
print(val.add(3))
```
results in
```
x: 5 y: 3
24
```
Current issues:
- [x] The python class created by torchscript doesn't interactly properly with the surrounding code.
```
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
return val
```
- [x] Doesn't properly take in non-pointer classes. Can't define this function signature in cpp (We don't want to support this I believe).
```cpp
void combine(Foo x) {
```
- [x] Has some issues with memory for blobs when constructing multiple objects (fix constant propagation pass to not treat capsules as the same object).
```py
torch.jit.script
def f(x):
val = torch._C.Foo(5, 3)
val2 = torch._C.Foo(100, 0)
val.display()
print(val.add(3))
```
- [ ] Can't define multiple constructors (need to define overload string. Currently not possible since we don't support overloaded methods).
- [x] `init` is a little bit different syntax than `pybind`. `.init<...>()` instead of `.def(py::init<>())`
- [x] I couldn't figure out how to add some files into the build so they'd be copied to the `include/` directories, so I symlinked them manually.
- [ ] Currently, the conversion from Python into Torchscript doesn't work.
- [ ] Torchbind also currently requires Python/Pybind dependency. Fixing this would probably involve some kind of macro to bind into Python when possible.
- [ ] We pass back into Python by value, currently. There's no way of passing by reference.
- [x] Currently can only register one method with the same type signature. This is because we create a `static auto opRegistry`, and the function is templated on the type signature.
Somewhat blocked on https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/21177. We currently use some structures that will be refactored by his PR (namely `return_type_to_ivalue` and `ivalue_to_arg_type`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/21098
Differential Revision: D16634872
Pulled By: Chillee
fbshipit-source-id: 1408bb89ea649c27d560df59e2cf9920467fe1de
