Previously, the doc's suggested `from torch._library.triton import wrap_triton, triton_op` doesn't work because wrap_triton is not imported in torch/_library/__init__.py but `from torch.library import wrap_triton` works. This PR imports wrap_triton and fix the doc.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144882
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
This is the initial version of an API to create custom operators whose
implementations are backed by triton kernels. While user-defined triton
kernels work out-of-the-box with triton kernels, you may wish to
construct a custom operator if you need to compose with other PyTorch
subsystems, like Tensor subclasses or vmap.
I'm hoping to get design feedback on this and ship it so that we can
begin experimenting with customers.
Test Plan:
- new tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130637
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR renames the implementation details of register_fake to align
more with the new name. It is in its own PR because this is risky
(torch.package sometimes depends on private library functions and
implementation details).
Test Plan:
- tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123938
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
The user provides a `setup_context` and a `backward_function`. These
get put into a torch.autograd.Function that gets registered as the
custom op's autograd implementation.
Test Plan:
- we update custom ops in the custom_op_db to use the new
register_autograd API.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123110
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
ghstack dependencies: #123108, #123109
This PR only adds abstract class registration logic without touching existing tests so they still trace with real script object. The added tests are only for registration APIs and test error messages.
Our design is that the abstract implementation should be in Python. This is much better in terms of usability. But this also has implications for custom op that takes script object as input, which is detailed later in this stack.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/122622
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #122619, #122620, #122621
Changelog:
- torch.library.impl_abstract optionally accepts a torch.library.Library
object. If passed in, then the lifetime of the registration is tied to
the Library object.
- we've also changed torch.library.impl_abstract to work on all
operators, including overloads.
- we refactored the `torch._custom_ops.*` and `torch._custom_op.*`
impl_abstract APIs and put them under torch._library. This is the
final resting place for them. I will follow-up with deleting
all the `torch._custom_ops.*` stuff later.
- There is a new "SimpleOperatorRegistry" where we actually collect the
abstract_impl. We will expand this to also hold the other
torch._custom_ops.* APIs when we move those to torch.library
NB: Previously we had designed
`impl_abstract` assuming a very high-level Python-only custom op API.
We've revisited that since; now, impl_abstract works for all custom ops,
no matter python or C++, no matter the schema. The new refactored design
reflects this better.
Test Plan:
- existing and new tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109912
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
