Support of effectful operations in backward:
1/ AOTD collects metadata from forward fn only, so we can have usage of effectful ops in backward, that were not used in forward => Allowing tokens discovery during joint function .
FunctionalTensorMode holds _tokens, in Joint function after tracing forward we memoize _tokens as `_tokens_forward_output`.
2/ Tokens are added as primals inputs (forward) in EffectTokensWrapper.
Tokens that will be used in backward are in partitioner saved values. We do not have control on which positions they are saved in forward outputs.
2/ If new tokens discovered in backward after tracing joint_fn, the result graph will be manually added in the end of primals.
_aot_autograd/utils.py
3/ All effectful ops during backward are marked with 'must_be_in_backward' partitioner_tag, to prevent partiitoner to place them in forward.
For that functional_tensor_mode got new optional state `self._effects_partitioner_tag` for effectful ops, to set after tracing forward.
There are additional changes in partitioner to improve functionality of 'must_be_in_backward'
4/ Unlift tokens now should run for both forward and backward.
- As saved for backward tokens are placed on non static places - we identify input and output tokens to erase, by input and output of `with_effects` operation
- In forward we can have input tokens, discovered in backward, that are not used in with_effects ops in forward, but saved for backward. We identify them by position in forward inputs.
5/ Adding aot debug logging for graphs before unlifting and before adding additional primal for backward tokens.
Tests:
```
python test/higher_order_ops/test_with_effects.py
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132638
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Part of #134054.
This corresponds to the pytorch mypy changes from D61493706. Updating takes so
long and touches so many files that it's impossible to land as a whole without conflicting with some other intermediate change.
So landing these 'type: ignore' for pytorch in advance of them actually being needed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134202
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
move benchmarking out of `torch._inductor.runtime.runtime_utils` and into `torch._inductor.runtime.benchmarking`, and prefer this path over directly accessing Triton's benchmarking
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132827
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Summary:
When using activation_memory_budget for float8 training, two issues were noticed:
- When `aggressive_options` (https://fburl.com/code/m1yoskxw) is called , all fp8 gemms (the scaled_mm op) are saved for recomputation.
- After adding "scaled_mm" in the `compute_intensive_ops`, we got the next error from `estimate_runtime`: `mat2 must be col_major` from `meta_scaled_mm`.
To fix it, modified `materialize_arg` to also include the stride of the original tensor.
Test Plan: Run float8 training with `activation_memory_budget`.
Differential Revision: D60777297
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132687
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
Internally there's a model that's using memory_budget with the partitioner, and using custom triton kernels. The partitioner fails when encountering the triton ops because they don't have `meta["val"]`. This PR adds `meta["val"]` to these fx graph nodes and then adds handling for `meta["val"]` being a dict in the partitioner.
Differential Revision: [D60627813](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D60627813)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132466
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #132356
Brian debugged the difference of the output type for inference and train graph.
Partitioner sometimes return list output type.
After this PR it will always return tuple.
Potentially there can be some new graphs inside tests that will be landed between this PR ci jobs finish and landing.
This could be easily fixed with fast-forward fix on:
```
EXPECTTEST_ACCEPT=1 python test/test.py
```
Adding ciflows/periodic to minimize this probability
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/131759
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/bdhirsh
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/127561
Mutations of inputs in backward are emitted manually, after joint_fn tracing.
With default partitioner logic they will be moved to "forward" graph, as this is operation on forward inputs.
To keep those mutations in backward:
- Introduce "subgraph" node key, that can be specified with contextmanager. When we do manual `copy_` in backward on forward input - we know that his is for backward - set subgraph="backward"
In partitioner:
Introducing optional argument subgraph, to filter out nodes with specified subgraph (node_subgraph) and not to add them to subgraph if node_subgraph is different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129130
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
Reland of: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128016
Summary from previous PR:
We assume only two possible mutually exclusive scenarios:
Running compiled region for training (Any of inputs has requires_grad)
Produced differentiable outputs should have requires_grad.
Running compiled region for inference (None of inputs has requires_grad)
All outputs do not have requires_grad.
Even if user runs the region under no_grad(), but has an input Tensor with requires_grad - we go Training scenario (1).
With current state that means:
1/ needs_autograd should not check torch.is_grad_enabled(), only that any of inputs requires_grad
2/ if needs_autograd => trace_joint (We are in training scenario 1.) => always run compiled region under with.enable_grad()
Changes in partitioner?
Inference and Training graphs had difference in return container, list/tuple.
The changes in partitioner are done to unify and return always tuple.
As a result - some changes in test_aotdispatch.py for graph contents list -> tuple.
Why was revert?
There was a regression of hf_Reformer model on inference.
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_FX_GRAPH_CACHE=0 python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --performance --inference --bfloat16 --backend inductor --device cuda --only hf_Reformer --cold-start-latency --use-eval-mode
```
Because one of the compiled graphs contained outputs, which are aliases to the inputs that are nn.Parameter(requires_grad=True).
Even if inference bencharmsk torchbench runs inside with` torch.no_grad()` - alias (specifically for hf_Reformer - expand) ops preserve requires_grad.
As a result we started compiling training graph instead of inference.
Fix for view ops:
If we have outputs, that are aliases to inputs that requires_grad, those outputs requires grad is not a reason to generate training graph.
This is handled in aot_autograd.py, where output_and_mutation_safe are calculated.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128890
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Reland of: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128016
Summary from previous PR:
We assume only two possible mutually exclusive scenarios:
Running compiled region for training (Any of inputs has requires_grad)
Produced differentiable outputs should have requires_grad.
Running compiled region for inference (None of inputs has requires_grad)
All outputs do not have requires_grad.
Even if user runs the region under no_grad(), but has an input Tensor with requires_grad - we go Training scenario (1).
With current state that means:
1/ needs_autograd should not check torch.is_grad_enabled(), only that any of inputs requires_grad
2/ if needs_autograd => trace_joint (We are in training scenario 1.) => always run compiled region under with.enable_grad()
Changes in partitioner?
Inference and Training graphs had difference in return container, list/tuple.
The changes in partitioner are done to unify and return always tuple.
As a result - some changes in test_aotdispatch.py for graph contents list -> tuple.
Why was revert?
There was a regression of hf_Reformer model on inference.
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_FX_GRAPH_CACHE=0 python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --performance --inference --bfloat16 --backend inductor --device cuda --only hf_Reformer --cold-start-latency --use-eval-mode
```
Because one of the compiled graphs contained outputs, which are aliases to the inputs that are nn.Parameter(requires_grad=True).
Even if inference bencharmsk torchbench runs inside with` torch.no_grad()` - alias (specifically for hf_Reformer - expand) ops preserve requires_grad.
As a result we started compiling training graph instead of inference.
Fix for view ops:
If we have outputs, that are aliases to inputs that requires_grad, those outputs requires grad is not a reason to generate training graph.
This is handled in aot_autograd.py, where output_and_mutation_safe are calculated.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128890
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
_extract_graph_with_inputs_outputs() does membership testing on the input nodes but often that collection is a list so the test is O(n). Ensure it's a set before looping over all the nodes.
This change speeds up the internal repro (D57090987) by about 18%:
before:
```
708.88user 15.86system 12:16.19elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 12898628maxresident)k
0inputs+91968outputs (3major+3532970minor)pagefaults 0swaps
```
after:
```
583.39user 15.98system 10:10.11elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 12895108maxresident)k
0inputs+87488outputs (4major+3374582minor)pagefaults 0swaps
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125937
Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen, https://github.com/anijain2305
**Summary:**
This commit simplifies the existing decomposition hierarchy
of batch norm ops by adding a single, backend agnostic op:
`batch_norm_with_update`. The existing hierarchy looks like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten._batch_norm_impl_index ->
[
aten.native_batch_norm ->
aten._native_batch_norm_legit (export only) ->
_batch_norm_legit_cpu/cuda (kernels, export only) ->
_batch_norm_cpu/cuda (kernels)
] OR
[ aten.cudnn_batch_norm ] OR
[ aten.miopen_batch_norm ]
```
Aside from complexity, an important problem with the
above decomposition hierarchy is cuda numerics in
export flows. We observed significantly worse convergence
when training a mobilenetv2-like model when using the
`_batch_norm_cuda` kernel instead of the `cudnn_batch_norm`
kernel. This means users who export their models on CPU
first then move the models to cuda later may silently
see worse accuracies even when cudnn is installed,
because they are using the worse kernel. This issue is
summarized in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384.
Instead, the new hierarchy proposed by consolidating
existing batch norm ops will look like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten.batch_norm_with_update ->
[ _batch_norm_cpu (kernel) ] OR
[ _batch_norm_cuda (kernel) ] OR
[ cudnn_batch_norm (kernel) ] OR
[ miopen_batch_norm (kernel) ]
```
The new op `batch_norm_with_update` hides backend
implementation details and automatically picks the right
kernel based on what is installed. This commit also adds
the following variants to this op:
```
batch_norm_with_update_functional
batch_norm_with_update.out
batch_norm_no_update
batch_norm_no_update.out
batch_norm_backward
```
Note that this commit only adds this op and its variants,
but does not actually change the decomps to produce these
ops in the graph. This will be done after the 2 week FC
window, and the ops used in the old stack is planned to
be removed after the 6 month BC window.
Test Plan: `OpInfo` tests for `batch_norm_with_update`.
Reviewers: albanD, bdhirsh
Subscribers: albanD, bdhirsh, supriyar
Tasks: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384
Differential Revision: [D54805279](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54805279)
Co-authored-by: Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar <tmanlaibaatar@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116092
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh, https://github.com/albanD
**Summary:**
This commit simplifies the existing decomposition hierarchy
of batch norm ops by adding a single, backend agnostic op:
`batch_norm_with_update`. The existing hierarchy looks like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten._batch_norm_impl_index ->
[
aten.native_batch_norm ->
aten._native_batch_norm_legit (export only) ->
_batch_norm_legit_cpu/cuda (kernels, export only) ->
_batch_norm_cpu/cuda (kernels)
] OR
[ aten.cudnn_batch_norm ] OR
[ aten.miopen_batch_norm ]
```
Aside from complexity, an important problem with the
above decomposition hierarchy is cuda numerics in
export flows. We observed significantly worse convergence
when training a mobilenetv2-like model when using the
`_batch_norm_cuda` kernel instead of the `cudnn_batch_norm`
kernel. This means users who export their models on CPU
first then move the models to cuda later may silently
see worse accuracies even when cudnn is installed,
because they are using the worse kernel. This issue is
summarized in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384.
Instead, the new hierarchy proposed by consolidating
existing batch norm ops will look like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten.batch_norm_with_update ->
[ _batch_norm_cpu (kernel) ] OR
[ _batch_norm_cuda (kernel) ] OR
[ cudnn_batch_norm (kernel) ] OR
[ miopen_batch_norm (kernel) ]
```
The new op `batch_norm_with_update` hides backend
implementation details and automatically picks the right
kernel based on what is installed. This commit also adds
the following variants to this op:
```
batch_norm_with_update_functional
batch_norm_with_update.out
batch_norm_no_update
batch_norm_no_update.out
batch_norm_backward
```
Note that this commit only adds this op and its variants,
but does not actually change the decomps to produce these
ops in the graph. This will be done after the 2 week FC
window, and the ops used in the old stack is planned to
be removed after the 6 month BC window.
Test Plan: `OpInfo` tests for `batch_norm_with_update`.
Reviewers: albanD, bdhirsh
Subscribers: albanD, bdhirsh, supriyar
Tasks: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384
Co-authored-by: Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar <tmanlaibaatar@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116092
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh, https://github.com/albanD
**Summary:**
This commit simplifies the existing decomposition hierarchy
of batch norm ops by adding a single, backend agnostic op:
`batch_norm_with_update`. The existing hierarchy looks like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten._batch_norm_impl_index ->
[
aten.native_batch_norm ->
aten._native_batch_norm_legit (export only) ->
_batch_norm_legit_cpu/cuda (kernels, export only) ->
_batch_norm_cpu/cuda (kernels)
] OR
[ aten.cudnn_batch_norm ] OR
[ aten.miopen_batch_norm ]
```
Aside from complexity, an important problem with the
above decomposition hierarchy is cuda numerics in
export flows. We observed significantly worse convergence
when training a mobilenetv2-like model when using the
`_batch_norm_cuda` kernel instead of the `cudnn_batch_norm`
kernel. This means users who export their models on CPU
first then move the models to cuda later may silently
see worse accuracies even when cudnn is installed,
because they are using the worse kernel. This issue is
summarized in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384.
Instead, the new hierarchy proposed by consolidating
existing batch norm ops will look like:
```
aten.batch_norm ->
aten.batch_norm_with_update ->
[ _batch_norm_cpu (kernel) ] OR
[ _batch_norm_cuda (kernel) ] OR
[ cudnn_batch_norm (kernel) ] OR
[ miopen_batch_norm (kernel) ]
```
The new op `batch_norm_with_update` hides backend
implementation details and automatically picks the right
kernel based on what is installed. This commit also adds
the following variants to this op:
```
batch_norm_with_update_functional
batch_norm_with_update.out
batch_norm_no_update
batch_norm_no_update.out
batch_norm_backward
```
Note that this commit only adds this op and its variants,
but does not actually change the decomps to produce these
ops in the graph. This will be done after the 2 week FC
window, and the ops used in the old stack is planned to
be removed after the 6 month BC window.
Test Plan: `OpInfo` tests for `batch_norm_with_update`.
Reviewers: albanD, bdhirsh
Subscribers: albanD, bdhirsh, supriyar
Tasks: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/111384
Co-authored-by: Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar <tmanlaibaatar@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116092
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh, https://github.com/albanD
