Currently, every time we construct a GLOBAL_STATE guard, we always create a fresh guard based on the current global state. For precompile, we want to create a GLOBAL_STATE guard always based on some external sources, e.g. serialized global states. This can also be applied with the normal case where we just pass in the global state guard from Python.
Differential Revision: [D77400988](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D77400988/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/157285
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Implements https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/93753 - move frame local guard accessors to C++.
Before, we used dict accessors on a Python dict representing the frame's fastlocals that we manually build. We move this accessor to C++ and additionally use the fastlocal index whenever possible.
Some implementation notes:
- `FrameLocalsMapping` is now initialized as a C++ vector of `PyObject`s. We do not just use the frame's localsplus/fastlocals buffer because we also unbox cells.
- `FrameLocalsMapping` can still be converted into a Python dict representing the frame's fastlocals, but it is done lazily.
- We update `LeafGuard`, `GuardAccessor`, and `GuardManager`'s `check_nopybind` methods to accept `FrameLocalsMapping`. By default, we convert the `FrameLocalsMapping` to a Python dict and run the original `check_nopybind` on it, but in some cases, conversion is not needed.
- We add a new guard accessor `FrameLocalsGuardAccessor`, which is similar to `DictGetItemGuardAccessor` but has special handling for `FrameLocalsMapping`. We create a separate class to emphasize different use cases, but we could probably combine these two (can do in a follow up)
dynamo_guard_eval.py microbenchmark update:
- 713.2us -> 630.0us (3.10)
- 598.8us -> 530.7us (3.12)
Other followups:
- Add `FrameLocalsMapping` version for `check_verbose_nopybind` in order to match behavior between `check_nopybind` and `check_verbose_nopybind`. This can prevent difficult debugging situations where guards fail (`check_nopybind` returns false) but no guard error message is generated (`check_verbose_nopybind` succeeds).
- Rewrite the `SHAPE_ENV` guard into C++ - it is a fairly common guard that results in `FrameLocalsMapping` needing to convert to a dict
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140063
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #142117, #142430
This PR moves the logic for computing the overlapping relations between input tensors that
share a storage instance to C++.
In summary, this PR:
- Moves both `tensors_definitely_do_not_overlap` and part of `compute_overlapping_tensors`
to C++
- Introduces a `check_overlapping` function that re-runs `compute_overlapping_tensors`,
checking that the result is consistent with what is expected
- Introduces the `StorageOverlapChecker` class
- Keeps track of overlapping and non-overlapping tensors
- Actually checks the overlapping relation (call `check_overlapping`) when all tensors
are collected
- Introduces the `STORAGE_OVERLAPPING` relational guard
- Has a reference to a `StorageOverlapChecker`
- Stores the to-be-checked tensors in the checker, and triggers its check
- Introduces `install_storage_overlapping_guard` python function
- Creates an instance of `StorageOverlapChecker`
- Creates 2 instances of the `STORAGE_OVERLAPPING` guard (for overlapping and
non-overlapping tensors), referencing the same `StorageOverlapChecker` instance
**Why is `StorageOverlapChecker` needed?**
The way `GuardManager` is implemented, we have no control over the order in which the
check methods are called, i.e. no control over the order the tensors are collected. So, we
can't easily split them in "overlapping" and non-overlapping kinds.
Instead, we create 2 instances of `STORAGE_OVERLAPPING` guard, each of which helps
collecting the tensors for one of the kinds mentioned above. They are then used in a
single `StorageOverlapChecker` instance.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140013
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
ghstack dependencies: #139554, #139555
This reverts commit 7743149b2be4a9eba7e0997ccdc6abe552bec266.
Reverts
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135503
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135502
* https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135422
This passes this test. Earlier, the getitem would stay like a getitem in the Fx graph. But now the fake tensor propagations fails saying that .item is called. It seems that torch function is not getting triggered while fake tensor propagation.
```
import torch
from torch.nn.attention.flex_attention import BlockMask, _mask_mod_signature, _score_mod_signature, flex_attention
from torch._inductor.lowering import make_pointwise, register_lowering
from torch._inductor.virtualized import ops
from torch.nn.attention.flex_attention import create_block_mask
torch.set_default_device('cuda')
flex_attention = torch.compile(flex_attention, dynamic=False)
prefix_lengths = torch.arange(8)
def prefix_lm(b, h, q, kv):
return prefix_lengths[b] >= kv
mask = create_block_mask(prefix_lm, 8, None, 512, 512, _compile=True)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136590
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
This PR adds a guard on the torch function mode stack state at the beginning of tracing. The way this is implemented is via a new leaf guard which is passed the initial stack state at construction and compares it to the stack state at the time the guard is run.
Details:
The stack state is extracted via popping all modes, appending them to a list, and pushing all modes back. This list is stored on the output graph and read during guard construction to pass to the stack mode guard. There the length and types of the modes are recorded. Next time the guard is run it compares this recorded state to the current mode stack state.
To implement this in python a helper function was added to utils.py and this is used if cpp guards are not enabled.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133130
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
We guard on key order
1) When a key is a non-constant object
2) When we actually need key order - like .values, .items etc
For dicts/OrderedDicts that do not require key order guarding, we just rely on usual `GuardManger + DictGetItemGuardAccessor`. This is faster than going through the `list(d.keys())` based design for OrderedDicts.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124779
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
