Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Type checking Python is a pain. Here are my learnings:
* The types for heavily polymorphic code is going to be verbose, no way around it. I originally was hoping I could lean on polymorphism with a bounded TypeVar to compactly write signatures for many of the ValueRanges methods, but I ran into some unworkaroundable mypy bugs. Writing out all the types explicitly and using `@overload` liberally works pretty well, so I think I recommend people do that instead of trying to do fancy things.
* Sympy is missing annotations for assumptions, because they are all metaprogrammed. I don't really relish maintaining a typeshed for sympy, so I wrote a small mypy plugin to add them in.
* GADT style refinement is... just not a good idea in practice. Mypy easily gets confused whether or not a return value from a refined section is allowed for the outer return type. So many of these have been replaced with less informative implementation types and more informative external types via overloads. Hopefully this is good for use sites.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118870
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/albanD
`test_typing.py` was written to use `pytest` in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54234 which unfortunately rendered it incompatible with run_test.py, and therefore it was not running in CI all this time.
In this PR, same functionality is re-written using unittest framework, and `parametrize` from `torch.testing._internal._common_utils`.
Valid `test_typing.py` with ufmt
Disable `fail/bitwise_ops.py` and `pass/jit.py` as it regressed at some point as well as one of examples in `namedtuple.py` as `torch.linalg.qr` type is no longer revealed correctly.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/111428
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
Part of my effort to move everything to pytest and decrease the number of testrunner frameworks in ci
Gives xmls but they might look a weird b/c module level tests vs tests in classes.
Doesn't give skip/disable test infra because those are tied to classes. (for future ref, could either put tests in classes or move the check_if_enable stuff into a pytest hook)
Tested in CI and checked that the same number of tests are run
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/95659
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
Summary:
This is a follow-up PR of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/52408 and move/convert all files under `test/type_hint_tests/*.py` to use the new test style.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53167
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D27081041
Pulled By: walterddr
fbshipit-source-id: 56508083800a5e12a7af88d095ca26229f0df358
