This ref does more things than `torch.norm`, and it fixes a few bugs
that `torch.norm` has. This implementation and the `torch.norm`
implementation come to terms in the next PR of this stack
We put this PR before, as otherwise `test_decomp.py` was failing.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81765
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Context: For a while slow gradcheck CI was skipping nearly all tests and this hid the fact that it should've been failing and timing out (10+h runtime for TestGradients). The CI configuration has since been fixed to correct this, revealing the test failures. This PR reenables slow gradcheck CI and makes it pass again.
This PR:
- makes slow and failing tests run in fast gradcheck mode only
- reduce the input size for slow gradcheck only for unary/binary ufuncs (alternatively, skip the test entirely)
- skip entire test files on slow gradcheck runner if they don't use gradcheck (test_ops, test_meta, test_decomp, test_ops_jit)
- reduces the input size for some ops
Follow ups:
1. Investigate slow mode failures https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/80411
2. See if we can re-enable slow gradcheck tests for some of the slow tests by reducing the sizes of their inputs
The following are failing in slow mode, they are now running in fast mode only.
```
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad___rmod___cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_householder_product_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad__masked_prod_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad__masked_prod_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_matrix_power_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_cat_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lu_factor_ex_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_copysign_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_cholesky_inverse_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_float_power_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_fmod_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_float_power_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lu_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_remainder_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_repeat_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_prod_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_slice_scatter_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_tile_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_pow_cuda_float64
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_pow_cuda_complex128
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_fft_*
test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_zero__cuda_complex128
test_fn_gradgrad_linalg_lu_factor_cuda_float64
test_fn_grad_div_trunc_rounding_cuda_float64
test_fn_grad_div_floor_rounding_cuda_float64
```
Marks the OpInfos for the following ops that run slowly in slow gradcheck as `fast_gradcheck` only (the left column represents runtime in seconds):
```
0 918.722 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_conv_transpose3d_cuda_float64
1 795.042 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_unfold_cuda_complex128
2 583.63 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_pool3d_cuda_float64
3 516.946 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_svd_cuda_complex128
4 503.179 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_svd_cuda_complex128
5 460.985 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lu_cuda_complex128
6 401.04 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lstsq_grad_oriented_cuda_complex128
7 353.671 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_pool2d_cuda_float64
8 321.903 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_gaussian_nll_loss_cuda_float64
9 307.951 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_stft_cuda_complex128
10 266.104 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_svd_lowrank_cuda_float64
11 221.032 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_istft_cuda_complex128
12 183.741 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_lu_unpack_cuda_complex128
13 132.019 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_unfold_cuda_float64
14 125.343 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_pad_constant_cuda_complex128
15 124.2 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_kron_cuda_complex128
16 123.721 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_pca_lowrank_cuda_float64
17 121.074 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_unpool3d_cuda_float64
18 119.387 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_rot90_cuda_complex128
19 112.889 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad__masked_normalize_cuda_complex128
20 107.541 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_dist_cuda_complex128
21 106.727 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_diff_cuda_complex128
22 104.588 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad__masked_cumprod_cuda_complex128
23 100.135 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_feature_alpha_dropout_with_train_cuda_float64
24 88.359 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_mH_cuda_complex128
25 86.214 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_unpool2d_cuda_float64
26 83.037 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_bilinear_cuda_float64
27 79.987 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad__masked_cumsum_cuda_complex128
28 77.822 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_diag_embed_cuda_complex128
29 76.256 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_mT_cuda_complex128
30 74.039 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lu_solve_cuda_complex128
```
```
0 334.142 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_unfold_cuda_complex128
1 312.791 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_lu_factor_cuda_complex128
2 121.963 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_unpool3d_cuda_float64
3 108.085 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_diff_cuda_complex128
4 89.418 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_max_unpool2d_cuda_float64
5 72.231 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad___rdiv___cuda_complex128
6 69.433 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad___getitem___cuda_complex128
7 68.582 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_ldexp_cuda_complex128
8 68.572 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_linalg_pinv_cuda_complex128
9 67.585 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_nn_functional_glu_cuda_float64
10 66.567 test_fn_fwgrad_bwgrad_lu_cuda_float64
```
```
0 630.13 test_fn_gradgrad_nn_functional_conv2d_cuda_complex128
1 81.086 test_fn_gradgrad_linalg_solve_triangular_cuda_complex128
2 71.332 test_fn_gradgrad_norm_cuda_complex128
3 64.308 test_fn_gradgrad__masked_std_cuda_complex128
4 59.519 test_fn_gradgrad_div_no_rounding_mode_cuda_complex128
5 58.836 test_fn_gradgrad_nn_functional_adaptive_avg_pool3
```
Reduces the sizes of the inputs for:
- diff
- diag_embed
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80514
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Originally, when these were written, they simply used the naive strategy of "upcast all inputs to floats, and downcast all inputs back". In addition to being... not quite what the kernels did, they also didn't capture some additional semantics. Namely, that the norms (except for layer norm on CPU! cc: @ngimel) return fp32 for the mean and rstd values.
Also, folks didn't like that I wrote `native_layer_norm` in terms of `native_batch_norm`. Which is fair - so I refactored the common logic into a `normalize` function.
cc: @jansel / @bertmaher , who've been looking at lowering layer norm/batch norm.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77407
Approved by: https://github.com/bertmaher
This makes prims look as if they were defined in native_functions.yaml
but they're still all written in Python. You now need to give a full
schema string for your prims. The returned prim object is now
torch.ops.prim overload (prims are not allowed to be overloaded,
so we return the overload, not the overload packet, for speed.)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77117
Approved by: https://github.com/mruberry, https://github.com/albanD
For the most part, PrimTorch refs have the same signature as their
ATen equivalents. I modify most PrimTorch refs to register themselves
as decompositions, using the prim name they wrap to find the aten name
(except for a few cases where the prim/aten names mismatch). There are
some exclusions, falling into one of two categories:
- The torch equivalent was already implemented as a CompositeImplicitAutograd
decomposition in C++
- The ref doesn't support enough features (e.g., the real deal has more
kwargs / overloads than are currently implemented)
PrimTorch refs are written as a single function that supports all
overloads, and this style is convenient for cases where we have a bundle
of overloads for what morally is a single overload with a Union type
on an argument (which we ought to have supported in
native_functions.yaml but blah); to support registering a single decomp
for all the overloads, we modify register_decomposition to register
to ALL overloads if you pass it an overload packet. This is technically
BC breaking but no tests started failing because of it.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76835
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee, https://github.com/mruberry
