Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/68028
Today, we demangle a typename before passing it to the TorchScript
compiler. This breaks compilation of torch classes in cases where we are
attempting to script the same class name from inside a package and out,
since we will return the same qualified name for both.
Differential Revision:
D32261907
D32261907
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: saketh-are
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: 921bc03ad385d94b9279fbc6f3b7dcd0ddbe5bc7
Summary:
As this diff shows, currently there are a couple hundred instances of raw `noqa` in the codebase, which just ignore all errors on a given line. That isn't great, so this PR changes all existing instances of that antipattern to qualify the `noqa` with respect to a specific error code, and adds a lint to prevent more of this from happening in the future.
Interestingly, some of the examples the `noqa` lint catches are genuine attempts to qualify the `noqa` with a specific error code, such as these two:
```
test/jit/test_misc.py:27: print(f"{hello + ' ' + test}, I'm a {test}") # noqa E999
test/jit/test_misc.py:28: print(f"format blank") # noqa F541
```
However, those are still wrong because they are [missing a colon](https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/3.9.1/user/violations.html#in-line-ignoring-errors), which actually causes the error code to be completely ignored:
- If you change them to anything else, the warnings will still be suppressed.
- If you add the necessary colons then it is revealed that `E261` was also being suppressed, unintentionally:
```
test/jit/test_misc.py:27:57: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
test/jit/test_misc.py:28:35: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
```
I did try using [flake8-noqa](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-noqa/) instead of a custom `git grep` lint, but it didn't seem to work. This PR is definitely missing some of the functionality that flake8-noqa is supposed to provide, though, so if someone can figure out how to use it, we should do that instead.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56272
Test Plan:
CI should pass on the tip of this PR, and we know that the lint works because the following CI run (before this PR was finished) failed:
- https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/2365189927
Reviewed By: janeyx99
Differential Revision: D27830127
Pulled By: samestep
fbshipit-source-id: d6dcf4f945ebd18cd76c46a07f3b408296864fcb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54915
TorchScript and torch.package have different mangling schemes. To avoid
them interfering with each other, we should undo the torch.package
mangling before processing anything with TorchScript (since TS
independently makes sure that no names collide).
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: SplitInfinity
Differential Revision: D27410472
Pulled By: suo
fbshipit-source-id: d1cc013c532d9abb7fb9615122bc465ded4785bb
