This PR corrects a small spelling error in `test/jit/test_alias_analysis.py`.
- "initalized" → "initialized"
This is a minor comment correction and does not affect functionality or logic.
Thank you for maintaining this amazing codebase.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/157628
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This PR is part of a series attempting to re-submit https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134592 as smaller PRs.
In jit tests:
- Add and use a common raise_on_run_directly method for when a user runs a test file directly which should not be run this way. Print the file which the user should have run.
- Raise a RuntimeError on tests which have been disabled (not run)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/154725
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73329
There is a quantization use case for having better alias analysis with function calls remaining. This does the relatively dumb approach of getting the inlined graph of each function call, and then analyzing that subgraph. Since we need a unique single analysis of every `Value*`, for every function call make a copy of the graph for every analysis past the first. This is relatively slow, but given the limited use case here should work well enough (and is no slower than calling the inlining pass).
cc vkuzo
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: davidberard98
Differential Revision: D34451424
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: b7c7e54679d723f5ded1e11ffb32eb6d2176431d
(cherry picked from commit 81a42b31522b890311a3f512448b372c4ebbefd1)
Summary:
I noticed after creating https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/71553 that the test ownership lint was not working properly.
This fixes my egregious mistake and fixes the broken lints.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71554
Reviewed By: malfet
Differential Revision: D33690732
Pulled By: janeyx99
fbshipit-source-id: ba4dfbcd98038e4afd63e326832ae40935d2501e
(cherry picked from commit 1bbc3d343ac143f10b3d4052496812fccfd9e853)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71170
As with an output in a tuple return, an output in a list return will not have any further uses that would make adding it directly to the list's contained elements give incorrect behavior. This unblocks a use case in op authoring.
cc Chillee
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: d1jang
Differential Revision: D33535608
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 2066d28e98c2f5d1b3d7e0206c7e39a27b3884b1
