Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
This has been bugging me for a while as I'm working on these Python scripts and they are not tracked by ufmt linter. So I add these script into that linter.
```
[[linter]]
code = 'UFMT'
include_patterns = [
'.github/**/*.py',
'test/run_test.py',
```
This change should just work and not break anything as ufmt (black + usort) linter is very safe to use for standalone util scripts.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97588
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
Summary:
During development it is common practice to put `type: ignore` comments on lines that are correct, but `mypy` doesn't recognize this. This often stems from the fact, that the used `mypy` version wasn't able to handle the used pattern.
With every new release `mypy` gets better at handling complex code. In addition to fix all the previously accepted but now failing patterns, we should also revisit all `type: ignore` comments to see if they are still needed or not. Fortunately, we don't need to do it manually: by adding `warn_unused_ignores = True` to the configuration, `mypy` will error out in case it encounters an `type: ignore` that is no longer needed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60006
Reviewed By: jbschlosser, malfet
Differential Revision: D29133237
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 41e82edc5cd5affa7ccedad044b59b94dad4425a
Summary:
This PR greatly simplifies `mypy-strict.ini` by strictly typing everything in `.github` and `tools`, rather than picking and choosing only specific files in those two dirs. It also removes `warn_unused_ignores` from `mypy-strict.ini`, for reasons described in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56402#issuecomment-822743795: basically, that setting makes life more difficult depending on what libraries you have installed locally vs in CI (e.g. `ruamel`).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59117
Test Plan:
```
flake8
mypy --config mypy-strict.ini
```
Reviewed By: malfet
Differential Revision: D28765386
Pulled By: samestep
fbshipit-source-id: 3e744e301c7a464f8a2a2428fcdbad534e231f2e
Summary:
Some machines don't have a versionless `python` on their PATH, which breaks these existing shebangs.
I'm assuming that all the existing versionless `python` shebangs are meant to be `python3` and not `python2`; please let me know if my assumption was incorrect for any of these.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58275
Test Plan: CI.
Reviewed By: zhouzhuojie
Differential Revision: D28428143
Pulled By: samestep
fbshipit-source-id: 6562be3d12924db72a92a0207b060ef740f61ebf
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56059
The lint doesn't do very much, mostly it enforces that indentation
is consistent. The real point of the lint is to just make sure
that we can still do surgery on codemod with tools like ruamel,
by reusing the configuration in this script.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: walterddr
Differential Revision: D27774590
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: c26bc6c95a478bd9b86387b18de7e906e7d13193
